It is about my final research

1. Research Method
Task Scheduling Algorithms for Large-Scale
Distributed Systems

2. Introduction
• Task scheduling in distributed systems optimizes resource allocation,
balances workloads, and reduces execution time to enhance
performance. As large-scale systems like cloud computing, big data,
and IoT grow, efficient scheduling is crucial for scalability and
reliability. However, existing methods struggle with scalability,
adaptability, and fault tolerance, leading to inefficiencies and reduced
system performance.

3. Statement of the Problem
Current scheduling algorithms struggle with
• Handling dynamic workloads in real-time.
• Scalability issues as the system grows.
• Load balancing and fault tolerance limitations in distributed systems.

4. Scope
Large-scale distributed systems (Cloud, IoT, Edge Computing, HPC).
Task scheduling optimization using hybrid algorithms (GA + PSO +
Priority-based).

5. Objectives
General Objective
• To design and implement an optimized hybrid task scheduling
algorithm that improves efficiency, scalability, and adaptability in
distributed systems.

6. Specific Objectives
• To analyze existing scheduling techniques (Heuristic, Meta-Heuristic,
ML-based).
• To develop a hybrid scheduling model (GA + PSO + Priority-based).
• To simulate and evaluate the proposed model using CloudSim.
• To compare the proposed approach with traditional scheduling
techniques.

7. Literature Review
• Refer to the notes section below for
explained part of the literature review

8. Literature Review
• Traditional Scheduling Approaches:
• Heuristic Methods: Round Robin, Shortest Job First.
• Meta-Heuristic: Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO).
• Machine Learning-Based Approaches: Reinforcement Learning, Deep
Learning.
• Challenges in Scheduling: Scalability, dynamic adaptability, and fault
tolerance.

9. Existing Scheduling Approaches
Heuristic Methods:
• Examples: Round-Robin, Shortest Job First.
• Pros: Simple, low computational cost.
• Cons: Lack adaptability, limited scalability.
Meta-Heuristic Techniques:
• Examples: Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle
Swarm Optimization (PSO), Simulated
Annealing (SA).
• Pros: Flexible, handle complex scheduling
scenarios.
• Cons: High computational demand, may
converge slowly.
• Machine Learning (ML)
Approaches:
• Techniques: Reinforcement
Learning (RL), Deep
Learning (DL).
• Pros: Adaptive, predict
workload patterns.
• Cons: Require large
datasets, resource-
intensive.

10. Key Challenges & Research Gaps
• Scalability: Many algorithms struggle with performance in large
systems.
• Adaptability: Static methods fail under dynamic workloads.
• Fault Tolerance: Lack of robust recovery mechanisms for node
failures.
• Computational Efficiency: Need for high performance with minimal
overhead.

11. Methodology
• Refer to the notes section below for
explained part of the methodology.

12. Methodology
• Research Approach: Theoretical analysis (literature review, algorithm
selection).
• Experimental testing using simulation tools (CloudSim).
• Steps:
1. Develop hybrid task scheduling algorithms.
2. Implement algorithms in CloudSim for testing.
3. Evaluate performance (execution time, load balancing, resource
utilization, fault tolerance).

13. Theoretical Analysis
• Literature Review: Conduct an in-depth review of existing scheduling
algorithms, including heuristic, meta-heuristic, machine learning.
• Algorithm Selection: Identify the strengths and weaknesses of
different methods to inform the design of a new hybrid algorithm that
combines Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO),
and Priority-Based Scheduling.

14. Experimental Testing
• Simulation Tool: Utilize CloudSim, a robust simulation platform for
modeling distributed systems, to test the performance of the
proposed algorithm.
• Setup: Create a virtual environment with data centers, virtual
machines (VMs), and network configurations to replicate real-world
scenarios.

15. Experimental Setup
• Simulation Tool: CloudSim
• Dataset:
• Task datasets: Varying execution times, priorities, and dependencies.
• Resource datasets: Different CPU, memory, and bandwidth capabilities.
• Evaluation Metrics:
• Task Completion Time, Resource Utilization, Scalability, Energy Efficiency, Fault
Tolerance.

16. Key Steps in Methodology
A. Algorithm Development:
• Design and Develop a hybrid task scheduling algorithm that integrates GA, PSO, and priority-
based strategies for efficient resource management.
B. Implementation in CloudSim:
• Integrate the algorithm into the CloudSim environment.
• Simulate various scenarios, including dynamic workloads and resource availability changes, to
assess algorithm adaptability.
C. Performance Evaluation:
• Metrics Evaluated:
• Execution Time: Measure how quickly tasks are completed.
• Load Balancing: Assess task distribution across resources.
• Resource Utilization: Evaluate efficiency in CPU, memory, and network usage.
• Fault Tolerance: Test the algorithm’s ability to recover from node failures and maintain stability.

17. System Development
• Hybrid Task Scheduling Framework: Task Classification: Categorizes
tasks based on priority and resources.
• Scheduling Algorithm: Integrates GA for global search and PSO for
fine-tuning.
• Resource Management: Optimizes CPU, memory, and network
utilization.
• Implementation: Developed using Python, CloudSim, and AI-based
optimization libraries.

18. Simulation

19. Results
• Performance Improvement: Hybrid scheduling reduced task execution
time by 20% compared to traditional methods.
• Scalability: Successfully handled up to 10,000 tasks with minimal
performance drop.
• Load Balancing: Dynamic task distribution improved resource usage
by 30%.
• Fault Tolerance: Reduced failures and improved system recovery time.

20. Limitations
• Computational Overhead: Hybrid models require more processing power.
• Data Dependency for Machine Learning: ML components (e.g., Reinforcement
Learning) need large datasets, which may not always be available or could lead
to biased results.
• Complexity in Algorithm Design: Combining multiple techniques (heuristic,
meta-heuristic, ML) increases complexity, making parameter tuning challenging.
• Adaptability to Dynamic Environments: The algorithm may require further
optimization for highly dynamic conditions, such as frequent workload changes.
• Real-World Testing: The study relies on simulations, not real-world cloud
deployment.

21. Conclusion & Future Work
• Conclusion
Hybrid scheduling (GA + PSO + Priority-based) improves task
allocation, scalability, and system efficiency.
Simulation results confirm superior performance over traditional
methods.
• Future Work
Implement in real-world cloud environments (AWS, Google Cloud).
Explore deep learning integration for adaptive scheduling.
Optimize energy efficiency for green computing solutions.

22. End Of Research Method Presentation
Thank You