The plaintiff filed a motion to compel the production of documents and electronically stored information from the defendants. The defendants had failed to produce any documents in response to the plaintiff's requests. The plaintiff argued that the defendants' claim that the documents are prohibited from disclosure by the Federal Bureau of Prisons is an exaggeration and that the documents requested are relevant to the case. The motion discusses the broad scope of permissible discovery under the rules and argues that the defendants must demonstrate specifically which documents are prohibited from disclosure.
The plaintiff filed a motion to compel the defendants to fully respond to the plaintiff's second request for production of documents and first and second set of interrogatories. The defendants' responses were incomplete, vague, evasive, and improperly limited. The plaintiff seeks discovery of direct and indirect contacts between the defendants and government officials, as well as documents and information related to the issues in the lawsuit. The plaintiff argues that full discovery is necessary and allowed under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
1) The document is a certificate of death for Maria Buduveanu, who passed away on March 4, 2022 in Broward County, Florida.
2) The immediate cause of death was listed as heart failure due to hypertension.
3) Traian Buduveanu is listed as the informant on the certificate.
This document is the plaintiff's response to the defendant's statement of disputed facts in a civil case. It provides 3 key points:
1. The defendants' motions contain statements intended to mislead the court about the plaintiff's lack of legal experience and understanding.
2. The court needs to carefully examine all documents in the case to see how the defendants have structured false statements.
3. The defendant continues to make false statements and has not addressed issues raised by the plaintiff, showing intent to undermine the court.
This document is the plaintiff's response to the defendant's motion to dismiss the action for failure to appear at a deposition. The plaintiff argues that the motion should be denied for several reasons: (1) the defendant has previously rescheduled the deposition multiple times; (2) the plaintiff has several serious medical conditions that have affected his health and ability to participate; and (3) under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court has authority to order a deposition be conducted by remote means or grant other accommodations due to a party's physical inability to attend. The plaintiff requests the court consider alternative arrangements to allow the deposition to proceed while also considering the plaintiff's pending motion for summary judgment.
This order considers the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent further construction of an expanded runway at an airport. The plaintiffs argue that the Corps of Engineers violated the National Environmental Policy Act and the Clean Water Act by authorizing the permit for the runway expansion without properly considering environmental impacts. To obtain a preliminary injunction, the plaintiffs must establish: (1) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; (2) irreparable harm; (3) the balance of equities tips in their favor; and (4) an injunction would not disserve the public interest. The court discusses the legal standards for preliminary injunctions under relevant laws before considering the plaintiffs' arguments.
1. The plaintiff, Traian Bujduveanu, filed a motion for summary judgment in a civil case against Dimas Charteris House and employees Derek Thomas, Lashanda Adams, and Ana Gipert.
2. The plaintiff alleges that while residing at Dimas Charteris House halfway house, a residential reentry center, he was constantly harassed, intimidated, and humiliated without regard to his medical conditions or religious beliefs in violation of his civil rights.
3. Specifically, the plaintiff argues that he was denied religious accommodations, discriminated against due to his religion and national origin, and that his requests for medical documentation were ignored constituting mistreatment.
This document is a motion filed in a federal district court case. The plaintiff argues that the defendants have failed to adequately respond to requests for documents and interrogatories. Specifically, the plaintiff argues that the defendants' responses lack details and documentation to support their claims that the plaintiff violated his halfway house rules. The plaintiff requests that the court strike portions of the defendants' response brief for failing to provide evidence or documentation to back up their statements.
Movant was incarcerated at FDC Miami with various medical conditions including Hepatitis C, diabetes, and chronic fatigue syndrome. While imprisoned, Movant's conditions limited his ability to engage in physical activity and work duties. Movant provided over 1,000 pages of medical records from various healthcare providers to prison officials documenting his conditions. Defendant was aware of Movant's medical conditions but denied him reasonable accommodations.
The plaintiff filed a motion to compel the defendants to fully respond to the plaintiff's second request for production of documents and first and second set of interrogatories. The defendants' responses were incomplete, vague, evasive, and improperly limited. The plaintiff seeks discovery of direct and indirect contacts between the defendants and government officials, as well as documents and information related to the issues in the lawsuit. The plaintiff argues that full discovery is necessary and allowed under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
1) The document is a certificate of death for Maria Buduveanu, who passed away on March 4, 2022 in Broward County, Florida.
2) The immediate cause of death was listed as heart failure due to hypertension.
3) Traian Buduveanu is listed as the informant on the certificate.
This document is the plaintiff's response to the defendant's statement of disputed facts in a civil case. It provides 3 key points:
1. The defendants' motions contain statements intended to mislead the court about the plaintiff's lack of legal experience and understanding.
2. The court needs to carefully examine all documents in the case to see how the defendants have structured false statements.
3. The defendant continues to make false statements and has not addressed issues raised by the plaintiff, showing intent to undermine the court.
This document is the plaintiff's response to the defendant's motion to dismiss the action for failure to appear at a deposition. The plaintiff argues that the motion should be denied for several reasons: (1) the defendant has previously rescheduled the deposition multiple times; (2) the plaintiff has several serious medical conditions that have affected his health and ability to participate; and (3) under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court has authority to order a deposition be conducted by remote means or grant other accommodations due to a party's physical inability to attend. The plaintiff requests the court consider alternative arrangements to allow the deposition to proceed while also considering the plaintiff's pending motion for summary judgment.
This order considers the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent further construction of an expanded runway at an airport. The plaintiffs argue that the Corps of Engineers violated the National Environmental Policy Act and the Clean Water Act by authorizing the permit for the runway expansion without properly considering environmental impacts. To obtain a preliminary injunction, the plaintiffs must establish: (1) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; (2) irreparable harm; (3) the balance of equities tips in their favor; and (4) an injunction would not disserve the public interest. The court discusses the legal standards for preliminary injunctions under relevant laws before considering the plaintiffs' arguments.
1. The plaintiff, Traian Bujduveanu, filed a motion for summary judgment in a civil case against Dimas Charteris House and employees Derek Thomas, Lashanda Adams, and Ana Gipert.
2. The plaintiff alleges that while residing at Dimas Charteris House halfway house, a residential reentry center, he was constantly harassed, intimidated, and humiliated without regard to his medical conditions or religious beliefs in violation of his civil rights.
3. Specifically, the plaintiff argues that he was denied religious accommodations, discriminated against due to his religion and national origin, and that his requests for medical documentation were ignored constituting mistreatment.
This document is a motion filed in a federal district court case. The plaintiff argues that the defendants have failed to adequately respond to requests for documents and interrogatories. Specifically, the plaintiff argues that the defendants' responses lack details and documentation to support their claims that the plaintiff violated his halfway house rules. The plaintiff requests that the court strike portions of the defendants' response brief for failing to provide evidence or documentation to back up their statements.
Movant was incarcerated at FDC Miami with various medical conditions including Hepatitis C, diabetes, and chronic fatigue syndrome. While imprisoned, Movant's conditions limited his ability to engage in physical activity and work duties. Movant provided over 1,000 pages of medical records from various healthcare providers to prison officials documenting his conditions. Defendant was aware of Movant's medical conditions but denied him reasonable accommodations.
United States District Court,Southern District of Florida,Case No: 11-20120-civ,Traian Bujduveanu v. Dismas Charities,Ana Gispert,Derek Thomas,Lasanda Adams
This affidavit was submitted in support of a motion for summary judgment. It was signed by Ana Gispert, the director of the Dismas Charities facility in Hollywood, Florida. The affidavit describes the plaintiff's guilty plea and sentence for conspiring to illegally export military parts to Iran. It details the rules and regulations plaintiff agreed to follow as part of his placement at Dismas Charities halfway house, including prohibitions on unauthorized cell phone use and driving. The affidavit alleges plaintiff violated these rules in October 2010 by driving himself to Dismas Charities and being found in possession of an unauthorized cell phone, leading to his termination from the program and transfer back to prison to serve the remainder of his sentence.
This document is a court docket summary from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. It details a civil case between plaintiff Traian Bujduveanu and defendants Ana Ginspert, Dismas Charities Inc., Derek Thomas, and Adams Leshota. The docket shows that Bujduveanu filed an amended complaint and various motions, including motions to appoint counsel and strike filings. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss. The docket also records the referral of pre-trial matters to a magistrate judge and the denial of Bujduveanu's motion to appoint counsel.
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Cocoselul Inaripat
1) The defendants filed a brief in response to the plaintiff's motion to compel production of documents.
2) The defendants agreed to produce documents but want inspection to occur at their attorney's office rather than at the defendant organization's office, due to the plaintiff's legal restrictions being near felons.
3) The defendants request that the court deny the plaintiff's motion to compel since they have agreed to produce documents according to the requested conditions.
This document is a declaration by Traian Bujduveanu, the plaintiff in this case. It summarizes that Mr. Bujduveanu was incarcerated at Dismas Charities halfway house and later on home confinement. While there, he claims he was humiliated, abused, discriminated against, and denied his constitutional rights and medical treatment by the defendants. He states he was denied access to religious services at Orthodox churches within 16 miles of the halfway house. Mr. Bujduveanu declares under penalty of perjury that the information in this document is true and correct to the best of his knowledge.
Memorandum of points and authorities in support of plaintiff's motion for sum...Cocoselul Inaripat
Movant was incarcerated at FDC Miami and diagnosed with several medical conditions including Hepatitis C. Despite his medical issues limiting physical activity, he was required to perform difficult work duties. Movant provided over 1,000 pages of medical records from various hospitals and medical facilities to prison officials documenting his conditions, but defendant disregarded his medical needs.
This document is a court docket listing filings and orders in a civil case. It indicates that the plaintiff filed a motion for return of property and for appointment of counsel. The plaintiff later filed an amended complaint. The court issued orders referring the case to a magistrate judge for pretrial matters, requiring a joint scheduling report, and denying the plaintiff's motions to appoint counsel. The docket also records the issuance of summons to defendants, the plaintiff filing an affidavit of service, and an order requiring payment of filing fees.
The document appears to be a court case filing with multiple pages. It includes a case number, document number, and is filed with the Florida Southern District court. The filing likely contains legal arguments or information related to an ongoing legal case.
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Mtion to compel production of documents and electronically stored informationsCocoselul Inaripat
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to compel the defendant to produce documents and electronically stored information in response to discovery requests.
2. The defendant refused to produce any documents, claiming that their release would be prohibited by the Federal Bureau of Prisons.
3. The plaintiff argues that the defendant's refusal to produce documents in response to lawful discovery requests is an attempt to cover up criminal acts and liability for abuse at the detention center.
Motion to compel second request for production of documents,first and second ...Cocoselul Inaripat
The plaintiff filed a motion to compel the defendants to fully respond to the plaintiff's second request for production of documents and first and second set of interrogatories. The defendants' responses were incomplete, vague, evasive, and improperly limited. The plaintiff seeks discovery of communications and records relevant to the claims in this case through proper discovery tools under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The plaintiff filed a motion to compel the defendant to fully respond to the plaintiff's second request for production of documents and first and second set of interrogatories. The defendant's responses were incomplete, vague, evasive, and failed to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and court orders regarding discovery. The plaintiff seeks discovery of relevant information and documents from the defendant pertaining to issues in the litigation.
Motion to compel second request for production of documents,first and second ...Cocoselul Inaripat
The plaintiff filed a motion to compel the defendants to fully respond to the plaintiff's second request for production of documents and first and second set of interrogatories. The defendants' responses were incomplete, vague, evasive, and improperly limited. The plaintiff seeks discovery of communications and records relevant to the claims in this case through proper discovery tools under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to supplement their previous motion to compel document production from the defendants.
2. The plaintiff argues that the defendants have withheld important documents and provided vague responses to interrogatories.
3. The plaintiff seeks to compel the defendants to fully respond to discovery requests regarding restrictions on the plaintiff's religious activities while incarcerated at Dania Charters.
Plaintiff's m otio n to supplem en t m otion to com pel second reouest for pr...Cocoselul Inaripat
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to supplement their previous motion to compel production of documents from the defendants.
2. The plaintiff argues that key documents provided by the defendants were incomplete or altered.
3. The plaintiff seeks to compel full disclosure of documents and names of individuals related to the case from the defendants.
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to supplement their previous motion to compel production of documents from the defendants.
2. The plaintiff argues that key documents provided by the defendants were incomplete or altered.
3. The plaintiff seeks to compel full disclosure of documents and names of individuals related to the case from the defendants.
Plaintiff's m otio n to supplem en t m otion to com pel second reouest for pr...Cocoselul Inaripat
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to supplement their previous motion to compel document production from the defendants.
2. The plaintiff argues that the defendants have withheld important documents and provided vague responses to interrogatories.
3. The plaintiff seeks to compel the defendants to fully respond to discovery requests regarding restrictions on the plaintiff's religious activities while incarcerated at Dania Charters facility.
Pl aintiff's m otion to strike defendants' dism as charities,inc., ana gispe...Cocoselul Inaripat
This document is a motion by the plaintiff to strike parts of the defendants' response brief. Specifically, the plaintiff argues that the defendants' brief contains irrelevant statements and fails to provide evidence or details to support their defenses. The motion asserts that the defendants have violated regulations related to halfway house operations and failed to properly investigate and document the alleged violations by the plaintiff. The plaintiff seeks to have parts of the defendants' brief stricken from the record.
Pl aintiff's m otion to strike defendants' dism as charities,inc., ana gispe...Cocoselul Inaripat
This document is a motion by the plaintiff to strike parts of the defendants' response brief. Specifically, the plaintiff argues that the defendants' brief contains irrelevant statements and fails to provide evidence or details to support their defenses. The motion asserts that the defendants have violated regulations related to halfway house operations and failed to properly investigate and document the alleged violations by the plaintiff. The plaintiff seeks to have parts of the defendants' brief stricken from the record.
This document is a motion filed in federal district court arguing that the defendants' response brief should be stricken. Specifically, the plaintiff argues that the defendants have failed to provide key details and documentation to support their claims, including dates, names of individuals involved, and records of investigations. The plaintiff also argues that the defendants have violated his civil rights and engaged in harassment. The motion aims to compel full disclosure of records related to the plaintiff's time at a halfway house and his transfer to a detention center.
Plaintiff's statement of material facts in support of the motion for summary ...Cocoselul Inaripat
1. The plaintiff, Traian Bujoreanu, filed a motion for summary judgment in his case against Dimas Charteris Houseway alleging violations of his civil rights.
2. Bujoreanu claims he was constantly harassed, intimidated, and humiliated during his residency at Dimas Charteris without regard for his medical conditions.
3. He also alleges his requests for religious accommodation were denied and he was discriminated against for his ethnicity and religion.
Plaintiff's statement of material facts in support of the motion for summary ...Cocoselul Inaripat
1. The plaintiff, Traian Bujoreanu, filed a motion for summary judgment in a case against Dimas Charteris Houseway alleging violations of his civil rights during his residency at their halfway house.
2. Bujoreanu claims he was constantly harassed, humiliated, and denied religious freedom without regard for his medical conditions.
3. He provided documentation to support claims of illegal search and seizure of his vehicle, unfair disciplinary actions, and false arrest without due process.
United States District Court,Southern District of Florida,Case No: 11-20120-civ,Traian Bujduveanu v. Dismas Charities,Ana Gispert,Derek Thomas,Lasanda Adams
This affidavit was submitted in support of a motion for summary judgment. It was signed by Ana Gispert, the director of the Dismas Charities facility in Hollywood, Florida. The affidavit describes the plaintiff's guilty plea and sentence for conspiring to illegally export military parts to Iran. It details the rules and regulations plaintiff agreed to follow as part of his placement at Dismas Charities halfway house, including prohibitions on unauthorized cell phone use and driving. The affidavit alleges plaintiff violated these rules in October 2010 by driving himself to Dismas Charities and being found in possession of an unauthorized cell phone, leading to his termination from the program and transfer back to prison to serve the remainder of his sentence.
This document is a court docket summary from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. It details a civil case between plaintiff Traian Bujduveanu and defendants Ana Ginspert, Dismas Charities Inc., Derek Thomas, and Adams Leshota. The docket shows that Bujduveanu filed an amended complaint and various motions, including motions to appoint counsel and strike filings. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss. The docket also records the referral of pre-trial matters to a magistrate judge and the denial of Bujduveanu's motion to appoint counsel.
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Cocoselul Inaripat
1) The defendants filed a brief in response to the plaintiff's motion to compel production of documents.
2) The defendants agreed to produce documents but want inspection to occur at their attorney's office rather than at the defendant organization's office, due to the plaintiff's legal restrictions being near felons.
3) The defendants request that the court deny the plaintiff's motion to compel since they have agreed to produce documents according to the requested conditions.
This document is a declaration by Traian Bujduveanu, the plaintiff in this case. It summarizes that Mr. Bujduveanu was incarcerated at Dismas Charities halfway house and later on home confinement. While there, he claims he was humiliated, abused, discriminated against, and denied his constitutional rights and medical treatment by the defendants. He states he was denied access to religious services at Orthodox churches within 16 miles of the halfway house. Mr. Bujduveanu declares under penalty of perjury that the information in this document is true and correct to the best of his knowledge.
Memorandum of points and authorities in support of plaintiff's motion for sum...Cocoselul Inaripat
Movant was incarcerated at FDC Miami and diagnosed with several medical conditions including Hepatitis C. Despite his medical issues limiting physical activity, he was required to perform difficult work duties. Movant provided over 1,000 pages of medical records from various hospitals and medical facilities to prison officials documenting his conditions, but defendant disregarded his medical needs.
This document is a court docket listing filings and orders in a civil case. It indicates that the plaintiff filed a motion for return of property and for appointment of counsel. The plaintiff later filed an amended complaint. The court issued orders referring the case to a magistrate judge for pretrial matters, requiring a joint scheduling report, and denying the plaintiff's motions to appoint counsel. The docket also records the issuance of summons to defendants, the plaintiff filing an affidavit of service, and an order requiring payment of filing fees.
The document appears to be a court case filing with multiple pages. It includes a case number, document number, and is filed with the Florida Southern District court. The filing likely contains legal arguments or information related to an ongoing legal case.
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Mtion to compel production of documents and electronically stored informationsCocoselul Inaripat
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to compel the defendant to produce documents and electronically stored information in response to discovery requests.
2. The defendant refused to produce any documents, claiming that their release would be prohibited by the Federal Bureau of Prisons.
3. The plaintiff argues that the defendant's refusal to produce documents in response to lawful discovery requests is an attempt to cover up criminal acts and liability for abuse at the detention center.
Motion to compel second request for production of documents,first and second ...Cocoselul Inaripat
The plaintiff filed a motion to compel the defendants to fully respond to the plaintiff's second request for production of documents and first and second set of interrogatories. The defendants' responses were incomplete, vague, evasive, and improperly limited. The plaintiff seeks discovery of communications and records relevant to the claims in this case through proper discovery tools under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The plaintiff filed a motion to compel the defendant to fully respond to the plaintiff's second request for production of documents and first and second set of interrogatories. The defendant's responses were incomplete, vague, evasive, and failed to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and court orders regarding discovery. The plaintiff seeks discovery of relevant information and documents from the defendant pertaining to issues in the litigation.
Motion to compel second request for production of documents,first and second ...Cocoselul Inaripat
The plaintiff filed a motion to compel the defendants to fully respond to the plaintiff's second request for production of documents and first and second set of interrogatories. The defendants' responses were incomplete, vague, evasive, and improperly limited. The plaintiff seeks discovery of communications and records relevant to the claims in this case through proper discovery tools under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to supplement their previous motion to compel document production from the defendants.
2. The plaintiff argues that the defendants have withheld important documents and provided vague responses to interrogatories.
3. The plaintiff seeks to compel the defendants to fully respond to discovery requests regarding restrictions on the plaintiff's religious activities while incarcerated at Dania Charters.
Plaintiff's m otio n to supplem en t m otion to com pel second reouest for pr...Cocoselul Inaripat
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to supplement their previous motion to compel production of documents from the defendants.
2. The plaintiff argues that key documents provided by the defendants were incomplete or altered.
3. The plaintiff seeks to compel full disclosure of documents and names of individuals related to the case from the defendants.
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to supplement their previous motion to compel production of documents from the defendants.
2. The plaintiff argues that key documents provided by the defendants were incomplete or altered.
3. The plaintiff seeks to compel full disclosure of documents and names of individuals related to the case from the defendants.
Plaintiff's m otio n to supplem en t m otion to com pel second reouest for pr...Cocoselul Inaripat
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to supplement their previous motion to compel document production from the defendants.
2. The plaintiff argues that the defendants have withheld important documents and provided vague responses to interrogatories.
3. The plaintiff seeks to compel the defendants to fully respond to discovery requests regarding restrictions on the plaintiff's religious activities while incarcerated at Dania Charters facility.
Pl aintiff's m otion to strike defendants' dism as charities,inc., ana gispe...Cocoselul Inaripat
This document is a motion by the plaintiff to strike parts of the defendants' response brief. Specifically, the plaintiff argues that the defendants' brief contains irrelevant statements and fails to provide evidence or details to support their defenses. The motion asserts that the defendants have violated regulations related to halfway house operations and failed to properly investigate and document the alleged violations by the plaintiff. The plaintiff seeks to have parts of the defendants' brief stricken from the record.
Pl aintiff's m otion to strike defendants' dism as charities,inc., ana gispe...Cocoselul Inaripat
This document is a motion by the plaintiff to strike parts of the defendants' response brief. Specifically, the plaintiff argues that the defendants' brief contains irrelevant statements and fails to provide evidence or details to support their defenses. The motion asserts that the defendants have violated regulations related to halfway house operations and failed to properly investigate and document the alleged violations by the plaintiff. The plaintiff seeks to have parts of the defendants' brief stricken from the record.
This document is a motion filed in federal district court arguing that the defendants' response brief should be stricken. Specifically, the plaintiff argues that the defendants have failed to provide key details and documentation to support their claims, including dates, names of individuals involved, and records of investigations. The plaintiff also argues that the defendants have violated his civil rights and engaged in harassment. The motion aims to compel full disclosure of records related to the plaintiff's time at a halfway house and his transfer to a detention center.
Plaintiff's statement of material facts in support of the motion for summary ...Cocoselul Inaripat
1. The plaintiff, Traian Bujoreanu, filed a motion for summary judgment in his case against Dimas Charteris Houseway alleging violations of his civil rights.
2. Bujoreanu claims he was constantly harassed, intimidated, and humiliated during his residency at Dimas Charteris without regard for his medical conditions.
3. He also alleges his requests for religious accommodation were denied and he was discriminated against for his ethnicity and religion.
Plaintiff's statement of material facts in support of the motion for summary ...Cocoselul Inaripat
1. The plaintiff, Traian Bujoreanu, filed a motion for summary judgment in a case against Dimas Charteris Houseway alleging violations of his civil rights during his residency at their halfway house.
2. Bujoreanu claims he was constantly harassed, humiliated, and denied religious freedom without regard for his medical conditions.
3. He provided documentation to support claims of illegal search and seizure of his vehicle, unfair disciplinary actions, and false arrest without due process.
1. The plaintiff, Traian Bujduveanu, filed a motion for summary judgment in a civil case against Dimas Charteris House and employees Derek Thomas, Lashanda Adams, and Ana Gipert.
2. The plaintiff alleges that while residing at Dimas Charteris House halfway house, a residential reentry center, he was constantly harassed, intimidated, and humiliated without regard to his medical conditions or religious beliefs in violation of his civil rights.
3. Specifically, the plaintiff argues that he was denied religious accommodations, discriminated against due to his religion and national origin, and that his requests for medical documentation were ignored constituting mistreatment.
This document is the plaintiff's response to the defendant's statement of disputed facts in a civil case. It provides 3 key points:
1. The defendants' motions contain statements intended to mislead the court about the plaintiff's lack of legal experience and understanding.
2. The court needs to carefully examine all documents in the case to see how the defendants have structured false statements.
3. The defendant continues to make false statements and has not addressed issues raised by the plaintiff, showing intent to undermine the court.
This document is a motion requesting an extension of the deadline to respond to a supplemental motion for summary judgment. It summarizes that the plaintiff is currently traveling in Europe receiving medical treatment. It requests the court grant an extension until October 31, 2012 to respond to the motion for summary judgment to allow adequate time for the plaintiff's response upon his return.
This document is a motion requesting permission to travel outside the United States to seek medical treatment. It summarizes the plaintiff's various medical conditions including Hepatitis C, liver cirrhosis, and diabetes. It details recent medical treatment received in Europe and describes a new treatment program in Ukraine. The motion requests the court's permission to travel abroad for this medical care, as the proposed treatment has not been approved by the FDA and is therefore not available in the US.
Traian Buduvanu, the plaintiff, filed a motion requesting additional time to respond to the defendants' supplemental motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff recently passed away and had undergone surgery, making a timely response difficult. Due to the plaintiff's poor health, an extension until June 30, 2012 was requested to allow time to find a new representative.
Traian Buduvanu, the plaintiff, filed a motion requesting additional time to respond to the defendants' supplemental motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff recently passed away and had undergone surgery, making a timely response difficult. Due to the plaintiff's poor health, an extension until June 30, 2012 was requested to allow time to find a new representative.
Traian Buduvanu, the plaintiff, filed a motion requesting additional time to respond to the defendants' supplemental motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff recently passed away and had undergone surgery, making a timely response difficult. Due to the plaintiff's poor health, an extension until June 30, 2012 was requested to allow time to find a new representative.
Plaintiff's response to defendant's motion to dismeiss action for failure to ...Cocoselul Inaripat
This document is the plaintiff's response to the defendant's motion to dismiss the action for failure to appear at a deposition. The plaintiff argues that the motion should be denied for several reasons. First, the plaintiff has been battling serious medical conditions that have caused his health to deteriorate and made it difficult for him to prepare for and attend the deposition. The plaintiff believes allowing remote testimony would address both the defendant's need for information and the plaintiff's physical ability to comply. The plaintiff also argues it is unclear why the defendant questions the plaintiff's health given his medical conditions. Finally, the plaintiff asserts the court has discretion to deny the motion and allow additional time to manage the case and address the important issues of public interest, discovery, and
Similar to Mtion to compel production of documents and electronically stored informations (20)
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
The document discusses the results of a study on the effects of exercise on memory and thinking abilities in older adults. The study found that regular exercise can help reduce the decline in thinking abilities that often occurs with age. Older adults who exercised regularly performed better on cognitive tests and brain scans showed they had greater activity in important areas for memory and learning compared to less active peers.
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Just...Cocoselul Inaripat
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Crominals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World
The United States government conducted a large raid involving over 30 agents from numerous agencies on Traian Bujduveanu's residence to seize assets. The lead prosecutors claimed in court that the assets were worth over $100,000, but they ended up being less than $10,000 in value, consisting of antique aircraft parts. The massive raid was unnecessary and terrorized Bujduveanu's 84-year-old blind mother, who was sent to the hospital. Witnesses state that Bujduveanu had been under surveillance for over a year before the raid. The government's actions seem aimed at justifying the expenses of the investigation rather than appropriately addressing the matter.
This document lists the names of various government agencies and individuals, including Jeb Bush, the Department of Justice, ICE agents, US Attorneys, Assistant Attorney Generals, FBI agents, and others. It also references concepts like government conspiracies, revolutions in Romania and Iran, corruption in government, and crimes against humanity.
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdfMalak Abu Hammad
Discover how MongoDB Atlas and vector search technology can revolutionize your application's search capabilities. This comprehensive presentation covers:
* What is Vector Search?
* Importance and benefits of vector search
* Practical use cases across various industries
* Step-by-step implementation guide
* Live demos with code snippets
* Enhancing LLM capabilities with vector search
* Best practices and optimization strategies
Perfect for developers, AI enthusiasts, and tech leaders. Learn how to leverage MongoDB Atlas to deliver highly relevant, context-aware search results, transforming your data retrieval process. Stay ahead in tech innovation and maximize the potential of your applications.
#MongoDB #VectorSearch #AI #SemanticSearch #TechInnovation #DataScience #LLM #MachineLearning #SearchTechnology
Fueling AI with Great Data with Airbyte WebinarZilliz
This talk will focus on how to collect data from a variety of sources, leveraging this data for RAG and other GenAI use cases, and finally charting your course to productionalization.
Driving Business Innovation: Latest Generative AI Advancements & Success StorySafe Software
Are you ready to revolutionize how you handle data? Join us for a webinar where we’ll bring you up to speed with the latest advancements in Generative AI technology and discover how leveraging FME with tools from giants like Google Gemini, Amazon, and Microsoft OpenAI can supercharge your workflow efficiency.
During the hour, we’ll take you through:
Guest Speaker Segment with Hannah Barrington: Dive into the world of dynamic real estate marketing with Hannah, the Marketing Manager at Workspace Group. Hear firsthand how their team generates engaging descriptions for thousands of office units by integrating diverse data sources—from PDF floorplans to web pages—using FME transformers, like OpenAIVisionConnector and AnthropicVisionConnector. This use case will show you how GenAI can streamline content creation for marketing across the board.
Ollama Use Case: Learn how Scenario Specialist Dmitri Bagh has utilized Ollama within FME to input data, create custom models, and enhance security protocols. This segment will include demos to illustrate the full capabilities of FME in AI-driven processes.
Custom AI Models: Discover how to leverage FME to build personalized AI models using your data. Whether it’s populating a model with local data for added security or integrating public AI tools, find out how FME facilitates a versatile and secure approach to AI.
We’ll wrap up with a live Q&A session where you can engage with our experts on your specific use cases, and learn more about optimizing your data workflows with AI.
This webinar is ideal for professionals seeking to harness the power of AI within their data management systems while ensuring high levels of customization and security. Whether you're a novice or an expert, gain actionable insights and strategies to elevate your data processes. Join us to see how FME and AI can revolutionize how you work with data!
For the full video of this presentation, please visit: https://www.edge-ai-vision.com/2024/06/building-and-scaling-ai-applications-with-the-nx-ai-manager-a-presentation-from-network-optix/
Robin van Emden, Senior Director of Data Science at Network Optix, presents the “Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” tutorial at the May 2024 Embedded Vision Summit.
In this presentation, van Emden covers the basics of scaling edge AI solutions using the Nx tool kit. He emphasizes the process of developing AI models and deploying them globally. He also showcases the conversion of AI models and the creation of effective edge AI pipelines, with a focus on pre-processing, model conversion, selecting the appropriate inference engine for the target hardware and post-processing.
van Emden shows how Nx can simplify the developer’s life and facilitate a rapid transition from concept to production-ready applications.He provides valuable insights into developing scalable and efficient edge AI solutions, with a strong focus on practical implementation.
Have you ever been confused by the myriad of choices offered by AWS for hosting a website or an API?
Lambda, Elastic Beanstalk, Lightsail, Amplify, S3 (and more!) can each host websites + APIs. But which one should we choose?
Which one is cheapest? Which one is fastest? Which one will scale to meet our needs?
Join me in this session as we dive into each AWS hosting service to determine which one is best for your scenario and explain why!
Building Production Ready Search Pipelines with Spark and MilvusZilliz
Spark is the widely used ETL tool for processing, indexing and ingesting data to serving stack for search. Milvus is the production-ready open-source vector database. In this talk we will show how to use Spark to process unstructured data to extract vector representations, and push the vectors to Milvus vector database for search serving.
Threats to mobile devices are more prevalent and increasing in scope and complexity. Users of mobile devices desire to take full advantage of the features
available on those devices, but many of the features provide convenience and capability but sacrifice security. This best practices guide outlines steps the users can take to better protect personal devices and information.
Your One-Stop Shop for Python Success: Top 10 US Python Development Providersakankshawande
Simplify your search for a reliable Python development partner! This list presents the top 10 trusted US providers offering comprehensive Python development services, ensuring your project's success from conception to completion.
TrustArc Webinar - 2024 Global Privacy SurveyTrustArc
How does your privacy program stack up against your peers? What challenges are privacy teams tackling and prioritizing in 2024?
In the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey, we asked over 1,800 global privacy professionals and business executives to share their perspectives on the current state of privacy inside and outside of their organizations. This year’s report focused on emerging areas of importance for privacy and compliance professionals, including considerations and implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, building brand trust, and different approaches for achieving higher privacy competence scores.
See how organizational priorities and strategic approaches to data security and privacy are evolving around the globe.
This webinar will review:
- The top 10 privacy insights from the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey
- The top challenges for privacy leaders, practitioners, and organizations in 2024
- Key themes to consider in developing and maintaining your privacy program
GraphRAG for Life Science to increase LLM accuracyTomaz Bratanic
GraphRAG for life science domain, where you retriever information from biomedical knowledge graphs using LLMs to increase the accuracy and performance of generated answers
GraphRAG for Life Science to increase LLM accuracy
Mtion to compel production of documents and electronically stored informations
1. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2011 Page 1 of 44
#
i
'
FI by t , o. .
c
.
LED
/j
I TH E UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO URT FO R
N /'
p
THE SO UTH ERN DISTRICT O F FLORIDA A6t2':
U y z1
'
:
STEVEN M . MORE
LARI F
CASE NO . 1I ZOIZO- V- TZ/ M ONTON
: - CI SEI SI CLERK U s Dl c'
sT, r
SD.fL -MIMI 1
. oFA A
TRAI BUJDUVEAN U,
AN
Pl ntf ,
ai if
VS.
DISM A S CHARI ES,l C.AN A G I
TI N , SPERT,
DEREK THOM A S and ADAM S LA SHAN DA
Def nt .
enda s
M OTJ TO COM PEL PRODUCTI OF DOCUM ENTS AND
-ON ON
ELECTRO NICALLY STORED INFO RM ATION S
Purua t Rul Rul 3.84)oft Commiso sRul ofPr cie 1 C. R.
s nt o e e 3 a he s in' e a tc , 6 F.
3. ( )M o n r s cf l mo f ra or rc
38 a , va t e pe tuly ve o n de ompelngDee da t Dimas
li fn ns s
Chartesl ,Ana Gipet Der Thom asa Las
ii ,nc. s r ek nd handaA dam st pr
o oduce
d c me t a dee to ial soe ifr to , s e u se b Mo a tsd c me t
o u ns n lcr nc l trd n omain a rq e td y v n ' o u n
y
reques s The gr
t. oundsf t smoton ar s f t bel :
or hl i e et orh ow
1 BA CK G RO UN D
.
1 On J y 25,2011,M ova pr
. ul nt opounded , t Def
on he endant hi Fis Reques For
s, s r t t
Pr uci OfDoc nt AndElcr nial Str dl or tons (Exhbi A) On
od ton ume s e to c ly o e nf ma i . i t .
Augus 24,2011 M ovantpr
t , opounde isFis Setofl erogat i To Def
d t rt nt r ores endant
s
( i tB) OnAugus 2 2 1 M ova tha rc i dar s ns fom t
Exhbi . t 6, 01 , n s e eve e po e r he
De e n s( i tC)
fnda t Exhbi .
2.Defendant ha f l t pr
s ve aied o oduce a docum ent i r pons t M ova ' r
ny s n es e o nts equest
f t Pr
or he oducton OfDocum ent .Ref t pr de any r pons t t
i s usal o ovi es es o he
docum e ar r
nt y equesswasbas upon an as rton t i woul be pr bied by t
t ed se i hat t d ohi t he
Fe r lBt ea OfPrs ns( hi tC) ( e3701Fo t pur e oft sl ea
de a t u
r io Ex bi . Rul . r he pos s hi ' n ul
e sveo i o eea we i t bete tda af itr t a we .
va i r nc mplt ns r s o r ae s alle o ns r)
3.D ef nt ' epr ent ton r di t r l e oft document i agr
enda s r es a i egar ng he e eas he s s oss
exagger i oft f t ,and r es sa atemptt hi Def
aton he ac s epr ent n t o de endant f l et
s' aiur o
di cl et r ponsve i or i I or i r
s os he es i nf maton. nf maton equest by t Pl ntfar not
ed he ai i e
deem ed t be Confde i ,Secr orCl sfed Doc ent ,a t Def
o i ntal et as ii um s nd he endant s
r pr entaPrvat NotForPr i Cor aton.
e es i e oft por i
2. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2011 Page 2 of 44
4. TheM ova ceriiest on Augus 5t' l4: PM ,M r. Davi S.Chai ,
nt tt hat t 1 201 , 00
' d et
Ator f t Def
t ney or he endant t ephoned t M ovanta sat t a1 Di ove y
s, el he nd t ed hat 1 sc r
reques w ilnotbem eet due t t f t reeas ofs docum ent and
t l , o he act hat l e uch s
i ormaton ar pr bied by t Depa m entO fJ tc Feder Bur ofPrs
nf i e ohi t he rt us ie. al eau ions.
5.Def endant havea hit y ofsi lri dent,and t wilcoverup a1
s sol mia nci s hey l l
i i i i f s a any prce.Res
ncrm natng act t i pondi t t Reques ForPr
ng o he t oducton O f
i
Docum ent and El r caly St ed l or atons,woul m e acce ance ofguit
s ectoni l or nf m i d an pt l
on t par oft Def
he t he endant,a w ilre
s nd l veala l hit y ofabuseata1 Di m as
ong sor l s
ChartesHous .
ii es
6.To excus t s vesf t f l e t pr
e hem el or he aiur o oduce t edoc ent ,D ef
hes um s endant have
s
e u rtdi terObe to s h rsme tp e a me t f o t n a ante
n meae n h i jcin , aa s n, rp y n o c s a d j i h
r ii oft pre ous sat ent gi on t t ephone conver aton,t t
epetton he vi t em , ven he el s l ha
r l i oft e docum e si pr bied by t Feder Bur u OfPrs
e easng hes nt s ohi t he al ea ions.
l t scas Def
n hi e, endant wilhave t dem onsr e t t Court whi h sat m ent and
s l o tat o he , c te s
reques pe an t t Feder Bur OfPrsons and pr entavald doc entfom
t rti o he al eau i , es i um r
t Feder Bur u OfPrs t t Def
he al ea ions o he endant,t f bi s h r eas
s hat or ds uc el es.
7.M ovantwillke t r i t sCourt t att tme t e act have t n pl
l i o em nd hi , hat he i hes s ake ace,
hewasi Com muniy Cusody a noti t Cusody oft Feder Bur Of
n t t nd n he t he al eau
Prsons.Dim asChartesi aprvat notf pr i cor aton t ca
i s ii s i e or oft por i hat nnotspeak i
n
t nam e ofUnied St esFede alBur Ofprsons.
he t at r eau i
8.Thi Cour hasnotced t Atom e f t t ef
s t i hat t y or he r endant hasa re i t
s ppea d n he
pit e l e'.The r on f whih t A tor y hasa
c ur at ' eas or c he t ne ppear d l e i be us
e at s ca e
Def endat w e tyi t clan up afe t Pl tf wast ken t FDC M i ,t
s re r ng o e t r he aiif a o ami hus
desr ng m os oft evi
toyi t he denceand i i i i doc ent ,and t needed tm e.
ncrm natng um s hey i
9.l s d benot t a1 oft Pl ntf pr t wasconfscat by t
t houl ed hat 1 he ai ifs opery i ed he
Defendat and t Pl i ifw ass t FD C M im iwihoutany document or
s he antf ent o a t s
per onalbel ngs.Thi woul alo e ur t Pl ntf doesnothave a
s ongi s d s ns e hat ai if ny
i i i tng docum e s,agai tD ef nt i hi pos esson.
ncrm na i nt ns enda s, n s s i
l0.Curousl enough,whie t U SPO hasr ved a c oft M oton ForThe
i y l he ecei opy he i
Re tn OfPr o ,i J nuay 2011 a d t Clr o Cou t sr eve a 1
tr
z ope n a r , n he ek f r ha ec i d 1
doc ent on t Docket durng t sperod oftm e,Def
um s he , i hi i i endant cl m t t y have
s ai hat he
neverr ved any doc ent .Thi r es sa gr sunder tm aton oft Unied
ecei um s s epr ent os esi i he t
St esPost Ofi and TheA i M ai actsgned i 1925.
at al tce r l i n
lI LEGAL STANDA RD
.
The f aldi
eder scover r esar lber i or rt as iti t pr par i f ti
y ul e i al n de o ss n he e aton or ral
a d s tlme ofltgae d s e . eBon v. r r , F.d 1 ,1 ( t
n ete nt ii td iputs Se d Uteas 585 3 061 075 7h
Ci. 09 .s ea s Kodihv.Oa o Ter c FiePr t Dit,23 F. D. 45
r 20 ) e lo
, s kbr ok ra e r o . s. 5 R. 447, 0
( D. 1. 006 Cth s opeofd s o r s ul beb o i or e t ad i t s a c
N. 11 2 ) te c ic vey ho d r ad n d r o i n he e r h
f rtuh' .
o rt ' l
2
3. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2011 Page 3 of 44
'Pr ti dicover t caly i '
' e-ral s y ypi l s 'accor a br and lber team ent ...Thi
ded oad i al r t . s
br rghtofdicover i bas on t gene alprnci e t ltgant ha a rghtt
oad i s y s ed he r i pl hat ii s ve i o
e y m an' evi
ver s denceand t wi acces t r eva f ss
hat de s o el nt act ervest i egriy and
he nt t
finesoft j ca pr esb pr tngt sac frt tth.
ar s he udiil oc s y omoi he e rh o he rl '
t'
Sho nv.hoe 5F. 28 1 2( nCi.1 3)i e n 1q ai a ct to
e S n, 3d1 9,29 9t r 99 (ntr a uottons nd iains
o te .
mitd)
A cont nton i er ogat y alow sapl ntf t l ' t f ualbas oft
e i nt r ol l ai if o eal he act
n es he
o i p o ' dee e s ePr t v. m 46 F. 73 733( t Ci. 006 ,a i
pposng a s fns , e a' Ta 4 3d 0, 7h r 2 ) nd s
t
no ob e to bl i i a ksf a opii nt tr ltst af c o t a lc to ofa
t j cina e f t s or n n o ha eae o a t r he ppi ain
lw t fc .S Fe R. V. 33 a ( .
a o a t ee d. Ci P. ( )2)
CommisonRue3. l()( )pr vi sf ' s ov r t tee e tt ti ma be
si l 3 c 1 o de or ' c e y o h xtn ha t y
di
r onabl e
eas y xpect t yi d i or i r eva t t alegatonsoft com pl nt
ed o el nf maton el nt o he l i he ai ,
t t pr
o he oposed r i ,ort t def esofany r pondent ...I or aton m ay not
elef o he ens es . nf m i
be wihhel fom di cove on gr
t dr s ry oundst t i onnaton wilbe i
hat he nf i l nadmi sbl at
si e
t hea i i t i or aton s
he rng f he nf m i oughtappear re onabl cal at t l t t
s as y cul ed o ead o he
dic r o a misbl e de c '1 C. R. 3 1( ( )
s ovey f d si e vi n e. 6 F. 3. c) 1
'
Pl ntf i entted t dicover r r ng any non- i l m atert t
ai if s il o s y ega di prvieged t ha
i r evantt any pa y' cl m ordef e,i udi i or aton t a
s el o rt s ai ens ncl ng nf m i hat ppears
r a ona y c lultdt la t dic vea ee i nc . d. Ci P. ( )
e s bl ac ae o e d o s o rbl vde e Fe R. v. 26 b .
Thi Cour hast a hort t or rs tonsi apary orisa t ney çf l t obey
s t he ut iy o de anc i f t t tor çais o
as h dulngo ote p era o d r'Fe R. v. 1 ( C)
c e i r h r r til r e . d. Ci P. 6 9( .
'
A .Cos - f i or Shari i I pr
t shitng nz s m oper.
The Feder Rul ofCi lPr
al es vi ocedur and applcabl cas l hol t unde
e, i e e aw, d hat r
or nar cicum sances apary s d beart expens ofcom pl ng wih dicove y
di y r t , t houl he e yi t s r
r que t. eOp nheme Fun l . Sa de s 437U. 3 ( 9 ) The
e ss Se pe i r d, nc v. n r, S. 40 1 78 .
r pondi par.ym ay r
es ng t equestt Courtt e erapr ectve or r at t undue
he o nt ot i der el ed o
bur orexpens i udi a r
den e, ncl ng eques t tdicover be condii
t ha s y toned upon tcos
< t
s fi 'l a 35 Ne rh l s 6a c ur s oul c nsde co ts it onl whe
hitng. d. t 8. ve tees,ç l o t h d o i r s h fi
' g ng y n
el r c daa i r atvel i
ectoni t s el i y nacces i e,s asi bac up t .'Zubul v.
sbl uch n k apes' ake
U. S. a bu gLLC, 7F. D. 9, 4 ( D. Y. 03 .
B. W r r 21 R. 30 32 S. N. 20 )
Asnoe by o DititCo ti t Si h Cic t Eshitn tec t o
td ne src ur n he xt r ui,f l fig h oss f
g
extaor nar el toni l s or i or aton dicover eforss d notbeus as
r di y ecr caly t ed nf m i s y f t houl ed
a atr tvet s ti ngars ndigp ry'o jcint und ra n s hefrs
n lenai o usani epo n at s be to o etkig uc fo t
i t fr tpl '
n he is ace.'
The reques f M ova t pay t entr pr
t or nt o he ie oducton cos i i pr rand
i t s m ope
fnda ntlyunfi. a s ul no berquie t pa frt fula ( os)
u me al arMov nt ho d t e rd o y o he a t nd gr s
neglgence oft D ef
i he endant Di masChartes,nc,Ana Giper,Der Thom asand
s. s ii l s t ek
Lashanda Adam swer notc
e oncer enough wih Pl ntfs'advance m edi
ned t ai if d cal
3
4. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2011 Page 4 of 44
!
condii when t havecom mit t e act,and t ty t hum ii e a t t e
tons hey ted hes s hey r o lat nd or ur
teM o ntj tb c us hei afr i r h s keEn ih wih a a c nthewa a
h va , us e a e s o egne , e po gls t n c e , s
Gr k- acedoni of Gr Or
ee M an eek hodox r i on,and hew oul r us t s
elgi d ef e o ubdue t t
o he
Defendant t t e.
s orur
W hie M ovantacknowl
l edge t r wilbe s e cos t Def
he e l om t o endantt pr
o oduce t e
hes
document Def
s, endant have no one t bl ebutt s ff t cos st be
s o am hem el or he t o
i r Had Def nda st ken r onabl s e t f l pr
ncur ed. e nt a eas e t ps o olow operpr dur ,i m ay
oce es t
notbe neces ar t pr
s y o oduce t e doc ent .A sa f hers
hes um s urt howi on why i w oul
ng t d
be fm dam ent l unf rf M ovantt s
t aly ai or o upportcoss,t scas i cosl enough f t
t hi e s ty or he
M ovant I woul be f m or bur ome on t M ova t i urt cos st t
.t d ar e dens he nd o nc he t han he
Def endant,whih t sr
s c out evenuesofM ilonsofDolar peryear m one t n f om
li l s , y ake r
t t
he axpaye .
rs
M ovantr pectuly r
es f l eques t Cour de any r
t he t ny eques by Def
t endant t r r
s o equie
M ova t pay t pr
nt o he oducton cos s.
i t
1 .CON CLUSION
11
Fort r
he easonsse f h above,M ovantr pect uly r
t ort es f l eques st sCourtt is t
t hi o s ue he
atache or compeli t pr
t d der lng he oducton ofdocum ent a t ngsasr quesed i
i s nd hi e t n
Pl ntf Fis Reques ForPr
ai if r t t oducton OfDocum ent And El r caly St ed
i s ectoni l or
l onnaton,and/ t sa i t Def
nf i or o ncton he endant f t rf l e t com pl wih t
s or hei aiur o y t he
di cover r
s y equest.Furt ,bas upon t above a gum ent i woul be i pr
s her ed he r ,t d m operf or
t Pl ntfst bea any oft cos si r i t pr
he ai if o r he t ncured n he oducton oft e fl .A s
i hes ies
such,Def ndant s d be r r t pay f t pr
e s houl equied o or he oducton oft r ponsve
i he es i
docum ents.
W HEREFORE,Pl ntfs woul r pectuly r
ai if , d es f l eques t t sCourtor D ef
t hat hi der endant s
Dim asChaltesl ,A na Giper
s i i ,nc. s tDer k Thomasa Las
e nd handa Adam s w ihi t
, t n en
( 0)da t pr duc t flst taer s nsvet dic ve yr q sss mitd i
1 ys o o e he ie ha r e po i o s o r e ue t ub te n
t scaus a t Def
hi e, nd hat endant s d be r quied t i
s houl e r o ncurt cos ofs d
he t ai
producton.
i
Dat Augus 29, l
e: t 201
Res f l s it d,
pectuly ubm te
...'''*
.
/
z z /
z pz
TRAI BUJ UVEA
AN D
A se
onv
,PRO SE
5. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2011 Page 5 of 44
CER TIFICA TE O F SERVICE
Iher ceriy t on oraboutJULY 25,2011 at and cor ec copy oft
eby tf hat rue r t he
f egoi docum entwasse
or ng rved upon t f l ng vi t Unied St esPosal
he olowi a he t at t
Servi Fis Cl sM ai:
ce, r t as l
D im asChartes,l ,
s ii nc.
1 N . .l St Avenue
4l W .
D a a,FL 33004-
ni 2835
Ana Giper
s t
D im asChartes,nc.
s ii l
1 N . .1 St Avenue
41 W .
D a a,FL 33004-
ni 2835
D e ek Thom as
r
D im asChartes,nc.
s ii l
1 N . .l St Avenue
4l W .
D a a,FL 33004-
ni 2835
Lashanda Adam s
D im asChartes,nc.
s ii l
14lN . .1 St Avenue
W .
D a a , 33004-
ni FL 2835
Davi S.Cha e , quie
d i tEs r
Ator y f Def
t ne or endant s
4000 Holywood Boul d
l evar
Suie 265- h
t Sout
Holywood, a33021
l Fl
EXECUTED ON THI 29t DAY OF AUGUST,201l
S h
<
. w /
/ // /
T / J utea êz
z r ô
TRAI BUJDU VE U ,PRO SE
AN
5601W .BROW A RD BLVD .
,
PLAN TATI ,FL 3331
ON 7
5
7. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2011 Page 7 of 44
!
I NI
J TED STATES DISTRICT CO I RT
J
SO UTHERN DISTRI OF FLO RI A
CT D
CASE NO . l 20120- W SEl S1 ON rON
l- C1 TZ/ M
TRM AN BUD U VEAN U
Pl ntf,
ai if
VS.
DI AS CI ARI ES,NC .,ANA GI
SM I TI I SPERT,
DEREK THOM ASAASHANDA ADAM S
D ef
endant
s.
PLM NTIFF' H R ST REO UEST FO R PROD UCTION
S
O F DO CUM ENTS A ND ELECTR OM CALLY STORED INFOR M ATI NS
O
TO DEFENDANTS DISM AS CH ARI ESJNC .A NA G I
- TI SPERT.
DER K
TH O M A S AND LASH AN DA ADAM S.
Pli if , a a Bu du a u, slntt Rul 3 ofteFe r l e ofCi l
antfs Trin j ve n purla o e 4 h de a Ruls vi
Procedur her r
e, eby eques t Def
t hat endnnt Dim asChartes, I ,AnaG ipe Der
s s ii nc. s rq ek
n om asand Las nda Adam spr
ha oduce t orgi s ofdocum ent des i bel
he i nal s crbed ow
wihi t 0 ( 0)d ysofs r ieoft sn iet bea t a r s a s tf rh i t
t n h1 3 a e vc hi otc o t he dd e s s e o t n he
Fis Am ended Compl ntorats ot tm e a l i ast partesm ay
rt ai uch her i nd ocaton he i
m ut l ap ee.
ualy
DEFG I O NS
TI
Forpt esoft sReques f Pr
upos hi t or oducton ofDoc l ent , t f l i def ii
i lm s he olow ng m tons
s la y unl sot wie s t aly i c e
hal ppl es her s pecik l ndiat d:
A. ''e wor '
Ih d' docum e 's lm ea any wrten orp a cm a t orot rm eans
nt' hal n it pbi ter he
ofpr ervi t
es ng houghtorexpr si , a a1 t bl t ngs fom whi i or aton
es on nd langi e hi r ch nf m i
can be process ortans i i udi , butnotlm ied t cor es
ed crbed, ncl ng i t o, r pondence,
m em oranda,not ,m ess ,l ter , t e am s t l t
es ages e t s el gr , e eyped m es ages,bule i di i
s ltns, ares,
chr ogi dat m i es,books r
onol cal a, nut , eport cha s l
s, rt, edge ,i ces,wor heet ,
rs nvoi ks s
r pt,com put prnt s s
ecei s er i out , chedul , afi vis conta s t crpt,s veys
es fda t , ct , oms i s ur ,
gr c r
aphi epres nt tonsofany ki phot a , r aphs,m i oll ,vi t
e ai nd, or phs cr m deo apes,t ape
r cor ngs,m oton pi t esorot fl .
e di i cur her im
B. A l doml ent pr
l m s oduced s lbe i bot ha copy f m atand el r c m edi ,
hal n h rd or ectoni a
t t ext t doc ent exi ti el r c m edi . l t docum ent once exit i
o he ent he um s s n ectoni a f he s sed n
8. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2011 Page 8 of 44
ee tolcme i bu weedeee De e da ss lpr uc mir ri gec pi o
lcr ri d a t r ltG f n nt hal od e ro ma o es f
t el toni m e a âom whi t doc ent w e e de et ors lpr
he ec r c di ch he um s r l ed hal oduce t he
el r cm e a.
ectoni di
C . ' ir ri a c pi s' e n tu a e c c pi soft e e to c med a
' r o m ge o e 'm a s r e nd xa t o e
M he l c r ni i
i udi t pori oft el r c m e a 9om wli m at ralhasbee del ed.
ncl ng he ton he ectoni di lch ei n et
D .' l doml ent and el
' 1
A m s ecloni m edi r atng t 'm eansa a a1 doml ent or
c a el i o' ny nd 1 m s
com nul catonst tconsim e,com pr s , cont i embody, efect i iy, t t
ni i ha tt ie an, r l , dentf s a e,
r frdie ty o i ie ty t o aei a wa r lva t t pa tc a s b e tma tr
ee rc l r ndr cl o r r n ny y ee nt o he riulr u j c te
i i i t r
dentled n he eques.
t
E. l any Reques i deem ed by Def
f ts endant t cal f t pr
s o l or he oducton ofdocnm e s
i nt
cover by t atom e clentorwor pr
ed he t y/ i k oductprviege, and Def ndsnt wihhol
il e s t d
sai docum e son t bassofone orbot oft prvieges pr vi a d s rpton of
d nt he i h he i l , o de e c i i
t doc entand t r ol dsf wihhol ng t docum e .
he um he m or t di he nt
F. I any document r ponsve t t r
f s es i o hese eques shavebeen des r a descrbe sai
t toyed i d
docl ent and t r onsf t rdesnz ton a sat t dat on whih s d
lm s he eas or hei t c i nd t e he e c ai
doclm ent wer des
l s e toyed. I any s des
f uch koyed docum ent exit i el
s sed n ectoni c
m e a pr vi e t e e to c m e i 9o whi h t do lm e sw e e de lo d.
di , o d he l c r ni d a m c he c l nt r s ye
G. ' s 'm eansa nat alper on;publc orprvat cor atona whet r
' on'
Per ny ur s i i e por i he
ogr ze frpr k ;g rme a e tt ; rn rhi asocain;c pa évej nt
r mi d o of oven ntl niy pates p; s ito oo ;oi
vent e;s e pr e or hi ;orot rl galentt . W ih res t abusnesse iy,
ur ol oprit s p he e iy t pect o i ntt
tl t m ' s 'i udesany nat alper on actng f m aly ori or aly asan
ie er ' on' ncl
per ur s i or l nf m l
em ployee,ofk er agent ator orot rr ese atve oft busnes entt
f , , t ney, he epr nt i he i s iy.
H .' i 'm eanseach rul , pr
' cy'
Pol e ocedur ordiectve,f m alori or al a each
e, r i or nf m , nd
com m on l sandi orcour e ofconductt wasr cogni ed ass h by Yotr
mder t ng s hat e z uc l
pr ntorf
ese onnerofi s diect s em pl
fcer , r or , oyees,age s,orot Per onsac i or
nt her s tng
pur tn t a tonYou be al ta wa i e f ta a y tmedli t pe id
porig o c r h t h t s n fec t n i lrng he ro
l
cove ed by t e r quess a i udesany changesofpolcy.
r hes e t nd ncl i
1 Thetr 'nd'a d' r'halbec nsru det rdij ci l o c nt tv l a
. ems' ' n ' 's l o t e ihe sun tvey r o jmciey s
a o
neces al t brng wihi t s
sy o i t n he cope oft di c y r
he s over eques a1 r pons t m i
t 1 es es hat ght
ot l iebe const out i ofiss .
hew s rued sde t cope
J. n eus oft sngul f m ofany w or i udest pl aland vi ve sa. I
e he i ar or d ncl he m' ce r n
addii t us ofany t e ofany ver i udesa1 ot t esoft ve b.
ton, he e ens b ncl 1 her ens he r
K. ' d'a ' r' hal c nsr e dijmci l o c jmc iel m ne e s r i
' ' nd ' 's lbe o tu d st tvey r ont tv y s c sa y n
An o
or rt brng wihi t sc ofeac r ques al doclment whi m i ot rwie
de o i t n he ope h e t l l s ch ght he s
be consrued t be out i iss
t o sde t cope.
9. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2011 Page 9 of 44
L. n e2n)'nd/r'st bera i b ht c nun uvea ddij tv a s l
1' o 'i o e d n ot he o j c n suncie nd hal
a
sr easarquetfri ornn nwhihwoul bers i un rac j nci
ev e s o nf r uo c d eponsve de onu tve
ra ngi n diint ali omai whihwoul ber ponsveund radsu tve
e di n d to o l nfr ton c d es i e ijnci
ra n
e di g.
M ' h'i udesb0t1'e ' ' r .''
'Eac 'ncl 1 'ach'and ' y
eve
N . n esi arand m nm i ge
ngul culne nders l r pe i y,Zcl t plz lO d
hal, es ctvel ude âe 4m
f i ne gender and vi ver a.
em ni , ce s
0. ' ' 'a '
You' nd 'your's lm e your fand a1 otzrpe onsactng orpur ng
' hsl >n sel 1 le rs i poei
t ac1on yo beha f
o ur l.
P* ' adng t 'and ' el est 'm ean;w ihoutlmiatonyr ae g t , conc- i
'
Rel o' ' at o'
r t i t i el o ng,
cons iutng,m endoni r er i t , des i ng,s msri ng,evi
tt i ng, ef rng o crbi nm zi dench g, lei
i np
relvantt dem ons i t ng t pr ordipr , orexpl n.
e o, matng, endi o ove s ove ni
R . ' muni i 'or ' m uni i 'lcl , wihoutlm iatonai per on
'Com caton' ' com catons' udes t i t i n- s
ort ephone conver atons f m ies lter ,el toni m xi,t egr m s t e
el s i , acsi l , e t s ec c l el a , elxes,
tpesorot s md r di oroierm ea oftans itng i ormndon *om one
a her ot ecor ngs, ns r m li nf
s ce t anot
our o her.
S. ' ai i ' n etr ' antFs'eest TrinBud z a d srbe i
' ntFs'
Pl - e m ' i i 'rfr o aa j uvemw s eci d n
Pl
t Compl nt
he ai .
T. 'Def ndant ' -n et r ' ef
' e s' e m ' endant 'i t cont oft scas r c t Di ms
D s' n he ext hi e ef o sm
Chsrtesl c Gipc Der k n om as,l handa Adxm q
ii ,nc.Ana s e as .
SCH EDULE O F D O CU M ENTS
1 One copy ofea ofD im a.Chartesl ,m os curentempl
ch s q ii , nc. t r oyeelssand
it
or mimionalchnrt.
gl z q
2.n e com pl e cont sofPl nt sper onalfl .
et ent ai e s e
3.n e com pl e cont sofany ot ll m ni ni i Pl ne snam e by any of
et ent her es nt ned n ai
t D ef nt
he enda s.
4. pi ofany a ali o ma i n i c tng whe he an oft
Co es nd l nf r to ndi a i t r y he
Def nds shasbe n c c e ofa c i e.
e mt e onvi t d rm
3
10. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2011 Page 10 of 44
5. y a a l ume s i Pli ifsnn , whi ar i t poss i
M nd 1 doc nt, n antf me ch e n he esson,
cusody orc r ofD ef nt , t ra t e i s i t s age s,
t ontol enda s hei tom ys, nve tga or , nt
em ployeesand ot rr ese aives.
he epr nt
6.Any a a1 m edi , psychi rc orot healh- at d r port orwrtngswhi
nd 1 cal ati her t rel e e s ii ch
des i oreval e Pl ntf sphyscalorm e alcondii orany teat entr ved
crbe uat ai if i nt ton r m ecei
by pl ntf atany tm e Pl ntf
ai if i ai ifwasatD im as Cha tesl ,ori Home
s rii , nc. n
Conf em e .
m nt
7.Any and al peror anceappm i al, eval i and r e sofPl ntf by any
l f m s s uatons, eviw ai i
D e endant
f .
8.Any a a1 wrii cont ni any r e nce t Pl ntf per or ancewhie at
nd l tngs ai ng ef re o ai ifs f m l
Dim asChartesl .
s ii ,nc
9. Any and al r cor ,coaes
l e ds ponde not , mc i i ,and ot doclm ent
nce, escom catons her l s
c e i orr l tng t Pl i ifsfl o a n d by Dim a Cha i sl Ann
onc m ng e a i o a ntf ies bt i e s s dte , nc,
Gi pert Der n om as,Las
s , ek handa Adam s, t cont nt oft e fl ,t
he e s hos es he
ciclm sancesunde whi t obt ned poss son oft e fl , orany
h rl t r ch hey ai es i hos es
w estga i oft
i ton hoseciclm sances
rl t .
1 Any and a1 r ds cores
0. l ecor , r ponde , not com m uni i ,a ot r
nce es, catons nd he
docdm e sconcerni orr atng t a cores
z nt ng el i o ny r pondenceorcom mzni i w ih
z catons t
CCM Diect Rodrguez, r di t Pl ntf sfl t rcont s t
r or i egar ng he ai if ies, hei ent , he
cicum sancest de whih Di m asCha ii ,l AnaGi perqDer Thom asand
r t m r c s rtes nc, s ek ,
Lashanda Ada sobt ned poss i oft
m ai esson hosefl , orany i s i ton oft e
ies nve tga i hos
ciclm s ances.
r l t
11. Any and a1 r ds cor es
l ecor , r ponde , not com mzni i ,a ot
nce es, l çatons nd her
doc ent concem i orr atng t any cores
um s ng el i o r pondence orcom m uni tonswih
ca i t
U . M ar halr di t Pl ntf fl , t rcont s t cictm s x
S. s egar ng he ai irs ies hei ent , he r l t ncesunder
whi Dim asChartesl yAna Gi perqDer k Thom asand Las
ch s ii ,nc s e , handaA dxm q
obt ned pos son oft e sl , orany i tgaton oft e ciclm s nnces.
ai ses i hos es nvesi i hos r l t
12. Any a al r or cor s
nd 1 ec ds, re pondence, not ,com m Aniatons,and ot
es lc i her
doc l ent concer ng orr atng t a cores
zm s ni el i o ny r pondenceorcom mt i i wih any
m catons t
of i ,em pl
fcer oyee orage oft Feder orSt eGove e , r gar ng t
nt he al at rnm nt e di he
Pl ntf ' fl t rcont s t cic l s a
ai ifs ies, hei ent , he r lm t ncestmderwli D im %
lch s
Cha ii ,nc.AnaG ipetDer n om asand Las
r tesl , s r ek , handa Adnm sobt ned pos s on
ai ses i
oft e fl ,orany i tgaton oft
hos ies nvesi i hosecicum sances.
r t
13. Any and a1 r ds c r pondence, not ,com ml i i ,and ot
1 ecor , or es es m catons her
doclm e sconc ni orr atng t a cor es
l nt er ng el i o ny r pondenceorcom muni i wih
catons t
US Stve Aa tr d, e r n Pli iforc ti ngt na o t Plitf
PO e n se u rga dig antf onani he me f he an i s
a t cicums ancest derwhi Dim asChartesrl , Giper,D e ek
nd he r t m ch s ii nc.Ana s t r
n om as a LashandaAdam sobt ned pos esson oft
, nd ai s i hosetl , orany hw esi i
ies tgaton
oft e cicum s ances
hos r t .
4
11. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2011 Page 11 of 44
1 Any and a1 r ds cores
4. l ecor , r pondence,not ,com ml c i and ot rdocum e s
es mi atons he nt
concem i orr atng t any cores
ng el i o r pondence orcomm uni atonswih any per or
c i t son
pe s ns o a nt ofUS r gadi Pl i i o c nti ngtena oft Pli if
r o , r ge s PO e r ng antz r o ani h me he antf,
and t cicum sancest
he r t mderwhi D im asChartesl ,M a Gipert Der k
ch s ii , nc. s , e
n om as a Las nda Ada sobt ned pos son oft e fl , orany i tgaton
, nd ha m ai ses i hos ies nves i i
oft e clcum sances.
hos t
1 Any and al r ds cores
5. l ecor , ponde not ,com m uni i ,and ot
nce, es catons her
docum e sconcem i orr atng t any com m uni i w ih any om ce , agentor
nt ng el i o catons t r
empl oyee oft Feder Cor i Cent i M im i r r ng t Pl ntY sfl
he al ecton er n a , ega di he ai i ies,
t rcont nt t cic s a
hei e s, he r um t ncesunderwli Dim asChartesyl ,Ana G ipert
tch s ii nc. s ,
Der k n om as and Las
i e , handaA dnm sobt ned pos es i oft e fl , orany
ai s son hos ies
nves i i oft e cicumstnces
tgaton hos r a .
16. Any and a1 r ds cor es
l ecor , r pondence, not ,com mt i i and ot r
es m catons, he
doclm ent concer ng orr a i t any cores
l s ni el tng o r pondence orcomnnm i tonswih any
ca i t
ofi ,e pl
fcer m oyee oragentoft Unied St esDe t entOfJ tce, Feder
he t at parm usi al
Bur O fPrs ,r r ng t Pl ntf sl , t rcontnt t ciclm sxnces
eau ions ega di he ai iFs es hei e s, he r l t
t rwhi Di m asChartes, I ,AnaGiper De ek n om as and La handa
mde ch s ii nc. s q r , s
A dam sobt i pos s on oft e fl , orany i tgaton oft e cicum sances
aned ses i hos ies nves i i hos r t .
1 Copi ofa a a1 s ve la e r por s vi apes,audi apes,
7. es ny nd 1 ur il nc e t , deot ot
phot a aofa oft pa te i t slws t
ogr phs ny he ri s n hi a ui.
1 Copi sofa a a1 i or i n fom a c
8. e ny nd l nf mato 'r ny omputri or a i
e nf m ton
c nt r a o c put r c m uni a i ce e , c n e ngt eplitft)
e e , nd/ r om e om c ton nt r o c mi h anifs
nam ed.
1 Any a a ldoc nt , i udi a wrte r pors whi sa et
9. nd l ume s ncl ng ny itn e t, ch tt he
s t nc off c sa opi onst whi h a e r i e c e t t tf a
ubsa e a t nd ni o c ny xpe t s xpe t d o esiy t
ti l orwhih cont i a s m a y oft gr
r a, c an um r he oundsf a s h opi on hel .
or ny uc ni d
20.Any a al e bispr pos t be ofe ed i o e de e a t tm e
nd 1 xhi t o ed o r nt vi nc t he i
ofti .
r al
21 A ny a a1 de ons r tve orvi uala dspr pos d f us a t i
. nd 1 m ta i s i o e or e t r al
i udi a pr
ncl ng ny opos d orpl ne f us t c a iy, lus r t oras, ti
e t d or e o l r f il t a e,
m ss n
i
e ani t t si ony ofa wines es
xpl i ng he e tm ny t s .
22.A c ofa 1sa e e s9om wi e s t t i i ntme i d i t
opy 1 tt m nt m s es o he nc de ntone n he
com pl i .
a nt
23.A copy ofeach phot aph, di gr m ,m a c r ordr w i whi h
or a a p, ha t a ng c
w ilbe i r
l ntoduc d a t i .
e t r al
5
12. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2011 Page 12 of 44
24. c oft de a a i pagef a i umnc agr e e
A opy he clr tons or ny ns e e m nt
be we def nt ora t r pa t a a pe s c
t en enda s ny hid ry nd ny r on anyi o a i ur nc
ng n n ns a e
b sne swh c ma b la l t stsyp r o al faj d e t c ma be
u i s ih y e ibe o aif a t r 1 o u n n whih y
e e e i t sac i ort i
nt r d n hi ton o ndemniy orr i
f embur edef nda sf pa e s
s e nt or m nt
ma et s tsys i ud me t s o n poiy l t, ihwa a ia l t
d o aif adj g n, h wig l i s wh c s valb e o
c mi
t de e nt on t da eoft i i des rbe i pl i irsco pl i ,
he f nda s he t he ncdent c i d n antf m ant
i udi pr m a y polc , sc n g p l y ba k t oiy,l rl poiy
ncl ng i r
h i y e o da oi , ln e p l z el l ,
c c mb a c
om eowne ' polc pr e sonalla lt polc , ora o he t of
rs iy, of s i l biiy iy ny t r ype
i ur ncepolc
ns a iy.
M , ,
/f& / # t /= kn ot,uy,x 11
f' z a ,l2
e ,
TRAI BUJDUVEAN U,PRO SE
AN
6
13. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2011 Page 13 of 44
CERTY ICATE OF SERW CE
lher ceriy t on oraboutJ LY 25, 2011a t and cor ectcopy oft
eby tf hat U rue r he
f egoi doclm entwasse
or ng l rved upon t f l ng vi t Unied St esPos
he olowi a he t at Gl
Servi Fi tCl M ai:
ce, rs ass l
Dim asChartes l ,
s ii , nc.
1 N . .1 St Avenue
41 W .
Dani FL 33004-
a, 2835
Ana Giper
s t
Dim asChartesl .
s ii ,nc
1 N . .1St Avenue
41 W .
Dani FL 33004-
a, 2835
De k Thom as
re
D im asChartes,nc.
s ii l
141N . .1 St A venue
W .
Dani FL 33004-
a, 2835
Lashanda Ada s
m
Dim asChartesl
s ii ,nc.
1 N . .1St Ave
41 W . nue
Dani , 33004-
a FL 2835
D a d S.Chai y quie
vi etEs r
Ator f Def ndant
t ney or e s
4000 Holm ood Boulvar
l e d
Suie 265- h
t Sout
Holywoody 33021
l FL
EXECU TED ON THIS 25: DA Y OF J
d ULY 201l
- < ' t
z AN / z VEA ,xwv ze
z/z
TRAI BUJDIT
z e
PRO SE
5601W .BROW ARD BLVD .
,
PLAN TATI ,FL 33317
ON
7
15. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2011 Page 15 of 44
IN TI E I N I
I J TED STATES DISTRICT CO URT FO R
TH E SOUTHERN DISTRI OF FLOD A
CT
CASE NO . 11-
: 20120- W SEl S> ONTON
C1 TZ/
TRA I BUJDUVEAN U,
AN
Pli it
antfl
VS.
Dlsm s cM Rrrl s,m c.AN A GI
s , SPERT,
DEREK THO M AS andA ow s LASHANDA
Defendant
s.
/
PLAI FF TR M AN BUJDW EAN U' FI ST SET O F
NTI S R
INTERR OG ATORIES TO DEFENDANTS ANA GISPERT DEREK THO M AS
AND LASH ANDA ADAM S
Pl ntfs Tr a Bu du a u, oSe p s n t t eFe r l e ofCi l
ai if, ain j ve n Pr , urua t o h de a Ruls vi
Procedur pr m d t f l ng l er ogat i st be ans ed unde oat by
e, opot he olowi nt r or e o wer r h
Defendant ,Dim asChartes,nc. AnaG ipet Der k n om asand Las
s s ii l , s l e handaA dnm s,
wihi t 1.y( )d ysofsr ieh r of
t n h14 30 a e vc e e .
G STRUCTION S
1.n eseI el gat i ar contnui i char ers ast r quieyou t fl
nt w ores e i ng n act o o e r o ie
s em ent r ans er i you obt n f t rordil enti or aton bef eti .
uppl ay w s f ai urhe fkr nf m i or ral
2. Pur uantt ,you ar unde a dut s ona y t am e a ans t t e
s o e r y eas bl o nd ny wer o hes
i er ogat i f whi you l m t t ans e i i s
nt r ores or ch ea hat he w r s n ome m at i res
eral pect
incompl e ori r and i t addii orc r i i or aton hasnot
et ncor ect f he tonal orectve nf m i
ot z i e been m ade know n t usdurng t di cover pr sori wrtng.
hew s o i he s y oces n ii
3. Forany i er ogat y orpar ofa i erogat y whi you r e t ans under
nt r or t n nt r or ch efus o wer
a cl m ofprviege,s ni a s n orcerii sat m ent9om yourc mselorone
ai il ubr t wor tfed t e ot
ofyourempl oyeesi whi you i iy t naur oft i or aton wihhel
n ch dentf he t e he nf m i t d;
s f t gr
peciy he oundsoft cl med pdviege and t par aph oft e i e r ores
he ai l he av hes nt r ogat i
t whi h t i or aton i r ponsve;and i ntf e per on t whom t
o c he nf m i s es i de iy ach s o he
i or to o a ypa the e ha be n dicos d.
nf main, r n r t rot s e s l e
4. Ans re c i e r tr f ly. fyo o j c t a i e r gao y,saet
we a h ntrogao y ul I u b e t o ny ntro t r tt he
raonsfro jci a a we t t e e teitrog t yi no obeto bl.f
e s o be ton nd ns r o he xtnth ner aor s t j cina e I
you a unabl t a w e an i er oga or f l s i asm uc Z f maton msi
re e o ns r nt r t y uly, ubm t h or i s
1
16. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2011 Page 16 of 44
a lbl expl n why yourans i i
vaia e, ai wer s ncompl e, and i ntf ordesc i a1 ot
et de iy rbe 1 her
s cesofm or compl e oracctr e i or a i .
our e et lat nf m ton
5. Forany r d ordocum e r ponsve orr a i t t e i erogat i wli
ecor nt es i eltng o hes nt r ores lch
i known t havebeen desr
s o toyed orl t o i o he wi eun va lbl , de iy e c
os, r s t r s a ia e i ntf a h
s docz entby aut ,addr s , d t nl rof a s a d s j c ma tr a
uch lm hor es ee ae, l mbe p ge , n ubet te; nd
expl i i det lt e sl ng t t desructon orl , ort r as f t
an n ai he vtnt eadi o he t i oss he e on or he
unavaiabiiy ofs h docum e .
l lt uc nt
6. No ap eem ent l
, mder t ng, orsi aton by t De m e ofJ i orany
sandi tpul i he part nt ustce
o isr p e e a i spu o tng t m o f , lmi,orot rwi evar t e
f t e r s nt tve m ri o diy i t he s y hes
i er ogat ess lbe vald orbi ng on t D e f e ofJ tcelnl s
nt r ori hal i ndi he pnrm nt usi ' es
c ime o a kno e e i wrtng ( ma ofr c r i o n c u t b ad y
onfr d r c wldg d n ii or de e o d n pe o r) y ul
aut i r esent i t eof
horzed epr atve her
7. Unl sot z i e sat a t e I e r oresr ert t t
es hew s t ed hes nt r ogat i ef o he ime,pl , and
ace
cicx sancesoft occur encem e i
r lm t he r ntoned orcom pl ned ofi t Compl t
ai n he e .
8. W he name and i iy ofa pe on i r r a pl
re dentt rs s equied ease sat f lnx e,hom e
t e ul m
addr and alo busnes addr , i known.
ess s i s ess f
9 W he ekno e geo i or toni po s si ofapa t i r q tG s h
. r wld r nf mai n s e son ry s e uese '
uc
reques i udesknowl
t ncl edge oft pary' agent , r pr ent i ,a t l s
he t s s e es atves nd m es
prvieged,hi atom e ,a i udesknowl
il s t ys nd ncl edgeobt i 9om ot pe s or
aned her r ons
s ces e i s
our , ven f uch
knowl edge woul behear ay undera i el w , and eve i t pe on recevi
d s pplcabl a n f he rs i ng
s i or aton di notbelevei, f l t confr isvaldiy, s egar i, had
uch nf m i d i t aied o lm t i t dir ded t or
ot know l
her edge t ca tdoubton t i or aton.
hat s he nf m i
1 l t eventt a doc entr
0. n he hat ny um equest by t e i er ogat i ort whi
ed hes nt r ores o ch
you r e i yourans st t e I e r oresi wihhel on t bas sofacl m
ef r n wer o hes ntr ogat i s t d he i ai
ofprviege,se f h f each docum e wihhe d:
il t ort or nt t l
() d sdpino tefc l n lg l ai f rh cam o g iie eo o j cin
a A ec to fh a ma a d e a b ss o te li f rvlg r b eto
i s fci det ls ast per i t courtt det m i t valdiy oft cl m or
n uf i ent ai o o m t he o er ne he l t he ai
o j ci
b e ton;
( A ge rldeci inoft d lme ti l igissz ,lngt fr a dsbe t
b) nea srpto he ocl n ncudn t ie e h,om n u jc
m at e A
t r'
()Then mea a r s oft epes nt)ore iy i l e i tec e tonoft
c a nd dd e s h r o s ntt nvo v d n h r ai he
docl ent
lm ;
17. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2011 Page 17 of 44
()Thedaeonwhc tedoc n wa ce td;
d t ih h ume t s rae
()n ena a a drse ofa1 ro whoha ha a c s t t d lme
e mes nd d ess 1pesns ve d c es o he ocl nt
9om t tm eofiscr aton t t pr ent
he i t e i o he es ;
( n edaeo whih t d l n wa ce td;a d
9 t n c he ocl t s r ae n
me
( )Then a a r s oft p e e c t inoftedo ume a t na s
g ame nd dd e s he r s nt usoda h c nt nd he me
and addr sesofa1 per
es 1 sonswho have r i c es s m ares ore ana i of
eceved opi , um i , xpl tons
t docum e .
he nt
11. l t eventt any docum e t whi you r eri yourans st t e
n he hat nt o ch ef n wer o hes
l e r oreshasbee des
nt r ogat i n koyed ordichar , orhasot wie l your
s ged her s eR
poss i c t and contol s f t
esson, us ody r , et orh:
()A g nea d srptonoft d u ntn l i issz ,ln h,om a ds j c
a e rl e ci i he oc me icudng t ie e gt fr n ube t
m ater;
t
( Thedae ma r a r a o s f d sr cin o dic r a
9 t, nnc , nd e s nt) or e tu to r s a d; nd
( n en me a a r s sofpe s nsa ho iig a d c nyig o t d sr ci
g) a s nd dd ese ro ut rzn n a n ut he e tu ton
ordi car oft doc l ent
s d he lm .
1 n es i er ogat i a e addr sed t al D ef
2. e nt r ores r es o 1 endant i t scas .
s n hi e
W FI TI
NI ONS
The wor ' lm ent 'i used i t eI e r oresi t br and lber
d ' l s' s
doc n hes ntr ogat i n he oad i al
s eand m eanswrten,t
ens it ypedsprnt , r ded orgr lcm ater howeve s or
i ed ecor apli t, r t eds
produced orr oduced,ofa ki and des i i and whet an orgi , m ast ,
epr ny nd crpton her i nal er
duplcat orcopy,i udi butnotlm ied t , paper ,not ,a ot s books
i e ncl ng, i t o s es cc mt , ,
a rts e s,l te ,m em or
dve i em nt e trs anda, not ofconver atons conkact ,av e ent ,
es s i , s em s
dr i t egr s,el
aw ngs, el am ectoni m ai, t r di ,com mlni i i udi
c l ape ecor ngs l catons, ncl ng
i erofk eand i r oG cem e ox da, r pors s di wor ng pa r com or e
nt - f nta- m t t, m es, ki pe s, at
r ds mi esofm eetngs,not
ecor , nut i ebooks bank de i slps,bnnk checks canceled
, post i , l
checks,di ,di y e res,appoi mentbooks, des cal
ades ar nti nt k endam , ov a
phot phs,
t crptonsorsound r
rans i i ecordi ofa t ofper onalort ephone c
ngs ny ype s el onver atons
s i
ornegotatons m eetngsorconf r
ii , i e encesort ngssm iart aay oft f egoi , and
hi i l o he or ng
t i ude any dat i or aton orsatsi cont i w ihi a dat s om ge
o ncl a, nf m i t itcs aned t n ny a t
modul t ,di cs diketes orot m em or devi orot i or aton
es, apes s , s t , her y ce, her nf m i
r deva e fom any sorage s t s, i udi butnotlm ied t comput -
et bl r t ysem ncl ng, i t o, er
18. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2011 Page 18 of 44
ge at r
ner ed eport and prnt s n ewor 'docum ent'al i udesdat c
s i out . d' ' so ncl a ompia i
ltons
âom w hi i or aton ca beobt ned and tansl e , i neces ar by t
ch nf m i n ai r at d f s y, he
r ponde t ough det cton devi i ar onabl us e f m . l a doc ent
es nt hr e i ces n eas y abl or f ny um
hasbeen m odi by t addii ofnoutonsorot wie, orhmsbeen pr r i
fed he ton i her s epa ed n
muli e copi w hi a noti i , each m odii copy oruni i copy i a
tpl es ch re dentcal fed dentcal s
s r e'
epa at docum ent'
.'
2. Def endu t m eansDim asChartes,i ,Ana Gipe ,Der Thom as Las nda
s s ii nc. s rt ek , ha
A dam s.
3.n et rm t im asChartes'm eansDim asChartesl ,he c por i
e r s ii ' s ii ,nc.t or aton
oper i 28 halway hous i 1 sat , wih t headquareri Louivil
atng f es, n 8 t es t he t n s le,
K e ucky,and t busnes ope at a 141N .W .1 St Avenue, a w Fl i 33304-
nt he i s r ed t . D ni orda
2835( whae e b i s f m ,ncudi c r mton, l ec r mton,
1 tv r usne s or i l ng o po i cos o po i
parne hi lm ied parner hi uni por ed as oci i , pr i or hi S
t rs p, i t t s p, ncor at s aton opret s p,
c po a in,l tdla lt c mpa y, a ot rf r ,ncudig a y r a pr pe t
or r to i e ibiiy o n or ny he o m) i l n n e l o ry
mi
owned,l ed orot wie occ ed att l i , per onalpr
eas her s upi hat ocaton s opert ofa ki a
y ny nd t
t tl i and any ot rrght com monl atrbut t t busnes known as
ha ocaton, he i s y ti ed o he i s
ç im asChartesl ,'i udi by way ofexa eand notlm iaton, tade
r s ii ,nc,' ncl ng mpl i ti r
nnm es,lquorlce ,c
i i nses opyrghtand tade ar rght .
i r m k i s
3.Asus her n,t t m '
ed ei he er ' comm uni i 's lm ean si l
catons' hal gn anguage, any or or
al
wrten ute ance,not i , orsat entofa nat e whatoever by and t
it tr aton t em ny ur s , o
whom s rm ade,i udi , butnotlm ied t cor es
oeve ncl ng i t o, r pondence, conver atons
s i ,
di ogues di c sons i erviw s cons t i agr ent and ot
al , s us i , nt e , ulatons, eem s her
l de stndi be- een orn ong t orm or pe ons.
m r a ngs m wo e rs
4. sus d he e n,t e t r ' 'a a i i a y I e r ga or s ul no be r a s
A e r i h e m ' ' ppe rng n n nt r o t y ho d t e d o
or
ast elm i t any par oft I erogat y, but w heneve a i e,i s lhave
o i na e t he nt r or , r pplcabl t hal
t s em eani ast t r ' .'Forexam pl an I eroga or st i 's
he nm ng he e m ' ' and e, nt r t y atng 'upportor
r er' lber as ' upportand r er'i an Ans t doesbot can be m ade.
ef 'shal ead ' s ef ' f wer hat h
5.' pl t'm ea t com pl ntfl d i t a
'Com e ' ns he ai ie n he bove r e enced acton.
ef r i
6. ' ou ' '
'
Y ' ' 'or' l com pany'r er t Def nda sDi m asChartesl ,Ana
your' ' r
yot ' ef s o e nt s ii nc.
y
G ipert Der n om asand Las
s , ek handaA dam s t pary t whom t I er ogat i
, he t o he nt r ores
ar addr s i bot t rà di dua capaciy, and is s
e es ed; n h hei vi l t t uccess s,as gns,
or si
employees agent ,atom e , and al ot per onspur i t acton t rbehal
, s t y l her s potng o hei f
4. n e phr e ' crbe i det l' use i t e i e r oresi udesar
as ' i n ai'as d n hes nt r ogat i ncl
des equest
f acompl e des i i a e ana i oft f s cic ssnces anal i ,
or et crpton nd xpl ton he act, r um t , ys s
opi ona ohe i omainrltn t t sbe tmatrofas cscitrog t y
ni nd t rnfr to eaig o he u jc te pe i ner aol .
5. ' dentf 'whe r eni t an i vi , com or i orot
' iy' n ef ng o ndi dual
I aton, her
entt s l m ean t s f h t ns eand t ephonemz be , and i acor ton or
iy hal o et ort he m el m r f pora i
ot e iy,isprnci epl ofbusnes , ori an i vi ,t pr entorl t
her ntt t i pl ace i s f ndi dual he es as
4
19. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2011 Page 19 of 44
kn wn ho a r s , sorhe j btteo tte , y who e o d a d a dr s of
o me dd e s hi r o il r ils b m mplye n d e s
t pl ofempl ent
he ace oym .
'dentf ' 'dentt 'm e t sat ora sat entof
' iy'or ' iy' ans o t e
I i t em :
a.i t cas ofape son ot t a nat r pe on, isnam e,t addr ofis
n he e r her h% u al rs t he ess t
p i i l a eofbusne s(n udig zpco ) istlpho nl r a t n meof
rncpa plc i s icl n i de, t ee ne l , nd he n
mbe
ischi e
t ef xccutveom ce ,aswel as, i i hasape son ol ert a nanl lper on t
i r l ft r h= m s hat
uli at y contol i,tl ot rpe on' name, t addr oft per on' prnci
tm el r s t lat he rs s he ess hat s s i pal
plc ofbusne s(ncu ngzpc de ,ha ohe pe s n' t e nenumbe , and t
ae i s i ldi i o ) t t t r ro s elpho r he
nam eoft ot rper on' chi executve ofk er
hat he s s ef i f ;
b.i t cas ofa nat alpc s , li orhe na e,busnessaddr sand t ephone
n he e ur on ls r m i es el
num be empl r,and tte orposton;
r, oye il ii
c.i t ca ofa com muni ton, isdae t ( . stlp ec nve s tonor
n he se ca i t t ,ype eg. ee hon o rai
d sus i ) t plc wh r i o ure t i ntt oft pe s n whoma t
ic son , he a e e e t cc rd,he de iy he ro de he
com m lni i t i ntt oft pe on who r ei t com m uni i , t
l caton, he de iy he rs ec ved he caton he
i iy ofe h ot per when i w asm ade, a t s j c mal rd suse
dentt ac her son t nd he ube t te ic s d;
d.i t caseofa docx ent t tte oft docum e ,t aut t tteorposton
n he zm , he il he nt he hor he il ii
,
oft a hor,t addr ee, eac r pi nt t t ofdocum e , t s jc matr
he ut he
te dat ofpr aton
h e epar i ess h eci e , he ype nt he ube t te,
,and isnum berofpa and
t ges;
e.i t cmseofan agr ent isdat t pl wher i occur edm t i ntt ofal
n he eem , t e, he ace et r he de iy l
per onswho w er pari t t av eem e , t i iy ofeach per on who has
s e tes o he nt he dentt s
knowl edgeoft ar e enta al ot pe onspr ntwhe i wasm ade, and t
he em nd l her rs ese nt he
s j c matroft a e n.
ube t te he pe me t
' ncl ng'm eansi udi , b no lm ie t
' udi '
I ncl ng ut t i t d o.
8. ' s 'm eansa nat alper on, c poain, o ny, rn rhi j i
' on'
Per ny ur s o rto c mpa pntes p,ont
vent e,frm,as oci i pr i or hi , age
ur l s aton, opret s p ncy,boar aut iy,comm i i
ds hort sson,
of i orot busnes orlgalentt , whe herprvat orgove nm e al
fce her i s e iy t i e r nt .
9. ' atng t 'm eanscont ni , consiutng,consderng,comprsi
'
Rel i o' ai ng tt i i i i ng,
concem i dicussng,r di des i ng, r l i s udyi com m e i or
ng, s i egar ng, crbi efectng, t ng, ntng
r pori on,mentoni anal ng, orr eni aludi orperai ng t i whol
e tng i ng, yzi ef ng, l ng, t ni o, n e
ori par.
n t
20. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2011 Page 20 of 44
G TERRO G ATO RV S
1 St eyourf lnam e, homea r s (nda1 dd e s sf tels tn ( 0) a s
. at ul dde s a 1a rse or h at e 1 ye r,
s alsec iy number dat ofbit , m a ialsttl a yolre pl ' nam e a
oci urt , e rh rt a ts nd z m oyers nd
a r s . ncud i you a we wholve wihyo i t ls tn ( 0 y a pei
dd e s I l e n r ns r i d t u n he a t e 1 ) e r rod .
2.St e i you e been convi ed ofa cnme. I s sat ast each convi ton t
at f ver ct ' f o, t e o c i he
s ii crm eand t dat and pl ofconviton.
pec fc i he e ace ci
3.St ei you everbeen apary, eihe pl ntf ordef
at f t t r ai if endnnt i a l ui ot x t
, n aws t hc han
r
t pr entm ater a i so, St ewhe he you w e e pl nlf orde endant t na ure
he es t , nd f at t r r ai i f , be t
oft acton,and t dat and courti whi s twasfled.
he i he e n ch ui il
4. I iy each e pl , agentand/ s
dentf m oyee or ervantorany ot per w ih per onal
her son t s
know ledge oftw f t perai ng t t occur ence,a i c t t e who we e e
l ac s t ni o he r nd ndi a e hos r ye
wines es,and st et s t oft ru ow l and artcul e t rexpect d
t s at he ubsance hei edge i at hei e
bsi ony.Foreac s hi viualie t yhso h r o tl a dj bf n t n
t tm
e h uc ndi d , d ni i r e jb ie n o u ci
f t o
e n pe r e by t a i vi l tt tm eoft s i i nt , a t s mma yof
i g db m d h t ndi dua a he i he e nc de s nd he u r
whatknowl
edge t w ines hasa a i at t rexpect t tm ony.
he t s , nd rt cul e hei ed esi
5.l anyone i tgat t sm aterf you i udi , butnotlm ied t m edi
f nvesi ed hi t or ncl ng i t o, cal
e rs prv t i si t so i u a ea j tr,saet i nn t)a
xpe t, ia e nve tgaor r ns r nc d use s tt her me s nd
a r s t s, ndsaewh t rs c h siai wa r d e t wrtng, and t
dd e se ) a tt ehe u h we tg ton s e uc d o ii he
s t
ubsanceoft ri tgaton and f ngs. I s d i tgat sobt ned any
hei nvesi i mdi f ai nves i or ai
s > ed,r or tans i oror sat e *om a i vi , i iy t
i ec ded, r crbed al t em nt ny ndi dual dentf he
per on who gave t s a e entand t pr entcusodi ofs s atm ent
s he t t m he es t an uch t e .
6.I ntf eac pe on Zt vi
de iy h rs er ewed conce ni t i dent . Fore such pe on
r ng hese nci s ach rs
s a et da e o t i e v e ; he s bsa c oft i e v e a l i t i t r i w wa
t t he t f he nt r i w t u t n e he nt r i w rd f he n e v e s
r or and/ tans i .
ec ded or r crbed
6
21. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2011 Page 21 of 44
7.I iy a1 pe s t whom you have gi s> ed sat
dentf l r ons o ven i t ement r di t e
s egar ng hos
i i n s t daet r ot a d t na oft pes ni who ec t y e c i a t s
ncde t,he t hee n he me he r o n s usod a h s t hi
tm e.
i
8. I iy each and evez wrten r
dentf y it eportm ade by any per on concer ng t
s ni he
i dent .
nci s
9. a e whe he o no t Pr mi e we e e i d wih avi o s v il nc c m e a
St t t r r t he e s s r qu ppe t de ur ela e a r
and,i so,whoser ponsi lt i wason t dat oft occurence t m oniort
f es biiy t he es he r o t he
surveil
lancecam er a whet t ear silt pes9om t da esoft occur ces
a nd her her e tl a he t he R
and t week b0t bef eand afert occ ance.
he h or t he ur
1 l you know oft e sence ofany pi ur ,phot a ,pl t ,viualr ded
0. f he xi t ct es ogr phs a s s ecor
i ge, ierpors da a o o jcsrltvet t ocure e t PlitT s
ma spolc e t, igrms r be t eai o he c rnc ,he ani
physi condii ort s ene oft occur ence, i ntf t s tm ceofsuc
cal ton he c he r de iy he ubsr h
r di and t pr entcusodi ofeach s iem .
ecor ng he es t u uch t
11.St ewhet ryou cons ed any dnz , m edi nes,oral
at he um gs ci coholc bever
i ageswihi
tn
t nt ot (4)h r pro t si ocure e teplc whees hdnl ,
we pf l 2 ous ir o ad c rnc ,h a e r uc gs
r
m edi nes,oral
ci coholc be ageswe e obt
i ver r azed, t nat eoft drugs m edi nes
he ur he , ci ,
oralcoholc be ages and t am ot t eof
i ver , he mt her .
1 Do you beleve t you di ever hi t you coul t pr
2. i hat d yt ng hat d o eventt e
hes
i de s. Setf h e yt ng t you di t avoi t sei de st tocc r . l
nci nt ort ver hi hat do d he nci nt ha ur ed s
t r anyt ng you wih you had done dif e l ?
he e hi s fer nty'.
1 I iy any pr
3. dentf ocedtr wli you f l
les lch olowed, atand bef e t tm eoft
or he i he
occur ence,concer ng Pl ntf m edi needs a is .
r ni ai irs cal nd s ues
7
22. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2011 Page 22 of 44
1 I ntf a1 Dim asChartesem pl
4. de iy l s ii oyeest we e awar oft f t tTr an
hat r e he act ha ai
Bu duv a wa tke b xmbuln et Br wa dHos tl a d ta hes ntmos of
j e nu s a n y ac o o r pia, n h t pe t
t ni , or t a r tand r ovali t e er
he ght bef et he r es em , n he m gency room atBr a d H os t ,
ow r pial
due t pai and di com f oflvera a
o n s ort i nd bdom en ?
1 I ntf al Di m asChartesempl
5. de iy l s ii oyeest wer awar oft f tt ALL
hat e e he ac hat
d i ngdoc nso TrinBud mm,i l ngDM V Drvi Re o; Co of
rvi ume t f aa juve ncudi i ng c r py
vald Fl i Drvi Li e, copy ofvald i ur
i orda i ng cens i ns ance is by A lsat I ur
s ued lt e ns ance
Co. a e a per onall t 9om t diect ofDM V i Ta l s , Fl i
, nd ven s eter he r or n lahms ce orda,
wer i hi fl f s e tm es atDim asChartesHalway Hous ?
e n s ie or om i , s ii f e
16.St e whe herornott Pr m i eswer equi d wih avi s veil csm ez
at t he e s e ppe t deo ur lance '
a
a i so,whos r ponsi lt i wason t dat oft occ= ence t m oniort
nd, f e es biiy t he es he o t he
surveil
lance c er a w hehert e a silt 9om t dat oft occur
am a nd t her re tl apes he es he ances
and t week bot bef eand afert occlanceand i you ha phot a , fl s
he h or t he tr f ve ogrphs im ,
m oton pi ur orvi a orot rpi ur r eva t t is i t scas
i ct es deot pes he ct es el nt o he s ues n hi e
showi t s
ng he cene oft soccur ence att tm e oforaferishappe ng, s i
hi r he i t t ni how ng
bascaly how i wast n ornow , oroft Pl ntf atany tm eaf t soc r nce,
i l t he he ai if i kr hi cur e
ort m at i si ved i t socc r nce?I s , sat t da e ofeac t per on
he eral nvol n hi ur e f o t e he t h, he s
tki t phot a and des i t cont ofeach.
a ng he ov phs crbe he ent
l St e t nam e,addr a occupaton ofeach per on whom you pr e t cal
7. at he ess nd i s opos o l
a a e petwines i l ngi yot a we t sbe tmatronwhihec s h
s n x r t s,ncudi n l ns r he u jc te
r c ah uc
experti expect t t tf t s t nce oft fndi and opi onst whi s h
s ed o esiy, he ubs a he i ngs ni o ch uc
experti expec ed t t tf and a s
s t o esiy, umm ar oft v ot dsf each opi on ofeac
y he m or ni h
s exper Atach copi oft r lm eorc ul vi ofeach s per on, as
uch t t es he esl unic um Ge uch s
wel ascopi ofa1 wrten r t m adeby any pr ed e
l es 1 it epors opos xpert I iy al
. dentf l
c ml i i wdte oror , you havehad wih t e i vi s.
om m catonsa tn al t hes ndi dual
1 I ntf a1 docum ent t you i e t i r
8. de iy l s hat ntnd o ntoduce i o evi
nt dence att al
ri
i udi docum ent t e torexpe st atyou i end t havet tf on yotr
ncl ng s he xper rt h nt o esiy , l
8
23. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2011 Page 23 of 44
behal atti haver ewed and/ r i upon i f m i t ropi ons, or are
f ral evi or eled n or ng hei ni
ot wi r evantt t scas l ude i yolra w e whet ryou havephot a
her se el o hi e. ncl n z ns r he op phs
tl s, m oton pi ur orvi a orot pit esr e
im i ct es deot pes her cur elvantt t i uesi t scas,
o he ss n hi e
showi t s
ng he cene oft socc r nce att tm e oforaRerishappeni , s
hi ur e he i t ng howing
bascaly how i wast ornow , oroft Pl ntf any tm e afert s occur ence,
i l t hen he ai ifat i t M r
ort m at i shw ol i tlsoccurence? St et dae ofeach, t pe on t ng
he eral ved n li r at he t he rs aki
t phot a and des
he ogr phs cdbe t c entofeach.
he ont
9
24. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2011 Page 24 of 44
CERTI CATE OF SFRYI
FJ CE
1 TRM AN BUJ
, DUVEANU,M i t 1ha t s24s da ofAugus
C T hat ve hi t y tzolls r da
eve
tu a core tc oft f e ng PLA I FF TRAI BUJDW EANU '
r e nd r c opy he or goi NTI AN S
FI ST SET O F I TER R O G A TO R I TO D EFEND A N TS D I A S
R N ES SM
CHARI SJNC.ANA GI
TW , SPERT,DEREK THOM AS AND LASHANDA
ADAM S,Upon De e nt,by c usng t bede ie wih t Urie Sot sPosa
f nda s a i o post d t he lt d e tl
Se v ce ,Fis Cl sM a l pr rpos a a fxed t r t , a es e asf l :
r i s r t as i, ope t ge fi he e o ddr s d olows
D im msChartessnc.
s ii l
141N . .1 St A venue
W .
Dnni FL 33004-
w 2835
Ana Gi pert
s
DimasCha i snc.
s riesl
1 N . .1 St A venue
41 W .
Da w FL 33004- 35
ni 28
De e Thom a
rk s
D i m asCharéesl
s i ,nc.
1 N . .1 St A ve
41 W . nue
Dani FL 33004-
w 2835
Las nda A dn s
ha m
D im asChartesl
s ii ,nc.
141 N . .1 St Avenue
W .
D a la , 33004- 35
ri FL 28
D avi S.Chai ,
d etEsquie
r
A tor f D ef
t ney or endnnt s
4000 Holm ood Boul r
l eva d
Suie 265-Sout
t h
H olyw ood,i 33021
l l
EXECUTED ON THI 24t DAY OF AUGUST,2011
S h
<
.e ? ?
I B
AN EANI ,PR
J sE
5601 w .BRo w u o B LvD .,
PLAN TA TI , 33317
ON FL
10
25. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2011 Page 25 of 44
ANA GISPERT
STATE OF FLORD A )
COUNTY OF )
AnaG sperq bei dul s
ng y wom , deposesa s y t t atached M s e sar tue
nd a hat he t w r er
a c r tt t bes ofhi/ know l , i or aton and belef
nd or ec o he t sher edge nf m i i
NO TARY PUBLIC
t it Typeo Stmp Co s ine
prn, r a mmiso d
Na ofNoa yPu i)
me tr blc
Per onaly Know n
s l OR Produced I ntt aton
de ik i
Type ofI ntt aton Pr
de ik i oduced:
SW ORN TO AN l SUBSCRI
l RED bef e m et s
or hi day of 2011
,
M y com m i i expies:
sson r
26. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2011 Page 26 of 44
DEREK THOM AS
STATE OF FLORI
DA )
COUNTY OF )
D e e n om a , i dul s
rk s be ng y wom , de e a s y t a t a t c d Ans r a e
pos s nd a h t he ta he we s r
t and cor ectt t bes ofli/ knowl dges i or i and belef.
rue r o he t lsher e nf maton i
N OTARY PU BLIC
( i ,TypeorStmp Commiso d
Prnt a s ine
Na ofNotr Pu i)
me ay blc
Per onaly Know n
s l OR Produced I ntfcaton
de ii i
Typeofl e tfc to Pr duc d:
d n ii a i n o e
SW ORN TO Ar SUBSCRI
BED bef e m et s
or hi day of 2011
,
M y c m isi e r
om s on xpies:
12
27. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2011 Page 27 of 44
LASHAN DA ADAM S
STATE OF FLORI
DA )
COUNW OF )
Lashanda Adams,bei dul s
ng y wom , depos and s t t atached M s sar
es ay hat he t wer e
t and cor ectt t bestofM she know l , i onnaton and belef
rue r o he / r edge nf i i.
N OTA RY PUBLIC
t it Ty o Sa Co s ine
prn , pe r tmp mmiso d
Na ofNotr Pu i)
me a y blc
Per onaly Known
s l OR Produced I ntf aton
de ik i
Type ofI ii i Pr
dentfcaton oduced:
SW ORN TO AN D SUBSCRI
BED bef e m etls
or li day of 2011
,
M y com m isi e r
s on xpies:
28. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2011 Page 28 of 44
I TI E IN I
N I J TED STA TES D I STR I COI RT FOR
CT T
TH E SOUTH ERN DISTRICT OF R ORD A
CA SE NO . 11 20120- V- TZ/ M ONTON
: - C1 SEI S1
BU D U VEAN U,
Pl ntf,
ai if
VS.
Dlsm s cl t ' s s, I c. ANA GI
tAlln N , SPERT ,
DEREK Tllom s and Aow s LA SH AN DA
Defendant
s.
PLAINTI TRAIAN BUD IT
FF VEAN U' FI
S RST SET OF
O T:RROGATORI TO DEFENDANT DI S CHARI S. C .
ES SG TR G
Plitfs TrinBudu a Pr Se p s n t t Fe ea RulsofCi
anif, aa j ve nu, o , urua to he d rl e dl
Procedur pr
e, opound t f l ng I e r ores t beD s ed underoat by
he olowi nt r ogat i o wer h
Defendant Dim asChartesl ,Ana Gipe t De e Tho a a La ha a Ada s
s, s ii , nc. s r, r k m s nd s nd m ,
wihi t ry( da ofs r iehee
t n hit 30) ys e vc r of
G STRUCTION S
1. Thes l er ogat esa cont ng i char ers ast r r you t K1
e nt r ori re hmi n act o o equie o e
s em enGr ans si you obt n f herordif r i or aton bef e ti .
uppl y wer f ai urt f e ent nf m i or ral
2. Puruantt ,you ar undera dut s
s o e y easona y t am end any a wert t e
bl o ns o hes
i er ogat i f wli you l n t t ans e i i s em at i r pect
nt r ores or lch ear hat he w r s n om eral es
incom pl e ori r ctand i t addii orcor ectve i or aton hasnot
et ncor e f he tonal r i nf m i
ot m ie be made know n t usdlrng t dicover pr s ori wrtng.
he s en o li he s y oces n ii
3. Forany i er ogat y orpartofan i er ogat y w li you r us t ans unde
nt r or nt r or lch ef e o wer r
a cl m ofprviege,s ni a s n orce ii d sat ent9om yourcouns orone
ai il ubr t wor rtfe t em el
ofyo z e pl ye si wlih yo i e iy t na u e oft i or a i n wih l
lr m o e n lc u d ntf he t r he nf m to t he d;
s f t v oundsoft cl m ed prvie a t pnr p aph oft e i er ogat i
peciy he he ai i lge nd he n hes nt r ores
t whi t i or a i i r ponsve;a i iy each per on t w hom t
o ch he nf m ton s es i nd dentf s o he
i or aton,orany par t eof hasbeen dicl ed.
nf m i t her , s os
4. Ans each i er ogat y f l . I yo o j c t a i e r gaor saet
wer nt r or uly f u b e t o ny ntro t y, tt he
raonsf obe tona a we t tw e e t i er aoyi no o jci a e.f
e s or j ci nd ns r o l xtnthe ntrog tr s t be ton bl I
you ar t e t ans an i er ogat y f l , s i asm uch i or aton asi
e mabl o wer nt r or uly ubm t nf m i s