This document is the plaintiff's response to the defendant's motion to dismiss the action for failure to appear at a deposition. The plaintiff argues that the motion should be denied for several reasons. First, the plaintiff has been battling serious medical conditions that have caused his health to deteriorate and made it difficult for him to prepare for and attend the deposition. The plaintiff believes allowing remote testimony would address both the defendant's need for information and the plaintiff's physical ability to comply. The plaintiff also argues it is unclear why the defendant questions the plaintiff's health given his medical conditions. Finally, the plaintiff asserts the court has discretion to deny the motion and allow additional time to manage the case and address the important issues of public interest, discovery, and
This document outlines a lawsuit filed by the plaintiff, Trai Bujdweanu, against Dimas Charities Inc. and several employees. It summarizes 17 allegations made by the plaintiff, including improper transfer between facilities, denial of religious services, illegal search of his vehicle, multiple violations of his rights, and incarceration without due process. The plaintiff claims he was discriminated against and harassed on the basis of his religion while housed at the Dimas Charities halfway house.
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to supplement their previous motion to compel production of documents from the defendants.
2. The plaintiff argues that key documents provided by the defendants were incomplete or altered.
3. The plaintiff seeks to compel full disclosure of documents and names of individuals related to the case from the defendants.
The plaintiff filed a motion to compel the production of documents and electronically stored information from the defendants. The defendants had failed to produce any documents in response to the plaintiff's requests. The plaintiff argued that the defendants' claim that the documents are prohibited from disclosure by the Federal Bureau of Prisons is an exaggeration and that the documents requested are relevant to the case. The motion discusses the broad scope of permissible discovery under the rules and argues that the defendants must demonstrate specifically which documents are prohibited from disclosure.
This inventory and receipt form documents personal belongings given to an inmate named Jose Rodriguez upon intake at Dismas Charities, including clothing, shoes, hygiene items, address book, and legal documents. The inmate signed acknowledging receipt of the listed items and the reason for inventory was noted as intake.
The defendants object to part of the magistrate's report and recommendation in a civil case. They agree with the recommendation to grant the defendants' motion to dismiss. However, they disagree with allowing the plaintiff to amend the complaint. The defendants request that the court refer additional pending motions, like motions for summary judgment, to the magistrate for consideration along with the report to support dismissing the case in favor of the defendants after discovery has closed.
Defendants dismas charties. inc.. ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Cocoselul Inaripat
1) The defendants filed a notice of proposed mediation order with the court to schedule mediation for the case of Traian Bujduveanu v. Dismas Charities, Inc. et al.
2) The proposed mediation order schedules mediation for November 1, 2011 at 10:30am at the offices of Lance Wogalter, P.A. in Boca Raton, Florida.
3) The order requires all plaintiffs and defendants to attend and mediate the matters in dispute.
This document is a court docket summary that includes case details and a chronological list of docket entries for case number 1:11-cv-20120-PAS in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The case involves a pro se plaintiff, Traian Bujduveanu, suing multiple defendants for the return of property. The docket entries show motions, responses, orders, and other routine case activities such as the assignment of judges and referral to a magistrate judge.
This document outlines a lawsuit filed by the plaintiff, Trai Bujdweanu, against Dimas Charities Inc. and several employees. It summarizes 17 allegations made by the plaintiff, including improper transfer between facilities, denial of religious services, illegal search of his vehicle, multiple violations of his rights, and incarceration without due process. The plaintiff claims he was discriminated against and harassed on the basis of his religion while housed at the Dimas Charities halfway house.
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to supplement their previous motion to compel production of documents from the defendants.
2. The plaintiff argues that key documents provided by the defendants were incomplete or altered.
3. The plaintiff seeks to compel full disclosure of documents and names of individuals related to the case from the defendants.
The plaintiff filed a motion to compel the production of documents and electronically stored information from the defendants. The defendants had failed to produce any documents in response to the plaintiff's requests. The plaintiff argued that the defendants' claim that the documents are prohibited from disclosure by the Federal Bureau of Prisons is an exaggeration and that the documents requested are relevant to the case. The motion discusses the broad scope of permissible discovery under the rules and argues that the defendants must demonstrate specifically which documents are prohibited from disclosure.
This inventory and receipt form documents personal belongings given to an inmate named Jose Rodriguez upon intake at Dismas Charities, including clothing, shoes, hygiene items, address book, and legal documents. The inmate signed acknowledging receipt of the listed items and the reason for inventory was noted as intake.
The defendants object to part of the magistrate's report and recommendation in a civil case. They agree with the recommendation to grant the defendants' motion to dismiss. However, they disagree with allowing the plaintiff to amend the complaint. The defendants request that the court refer additional pending motions, like motions for summary judgment, to the magistrate for consideration along with the report to support dismissing the case in favor of the defendants after discovery has closed.
Defendants dismas charties. inc.. ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Cocoselul Inaripat
1) The defendants filed a notice of proposed mediation order with the court to schedule mediation for the case of Traian Bujduveanu v. Dismas Charities, Inc. et al.
2) The proposed mediation order schedules mediation for November 1, 2011 at 10:30am at the offices of Lance Wogalter, P.A. in Boca Raton, Florida.
3) The order requires all plaintiffs and defendants to attend and mediate the matters in dispute.
This document is a court docket summary that includes case details and a chronological list of docket entries for case number 1:11-cv-20120-PAS in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The case involves a pro se plaintiff, Traian Bujduveanu, suing multiple defendants for the return of property. The docket entries show motions, responses, orders, and other routine case activities such as the assignment of judges and referral to a magistrate judge.
This document outlines a lawsuit filed by the plaintiff (referred to as the "Movant") against Dimas Charters Inc. and several employees. It alleges 17 counts including improper treatment, denial of religious freedom, illegal search and seizure of property, and incarceration without due process. Specifically, it claims the Movant was constantly harassed and denied medical accommodation while housed at a halfway house run by Dimas Charters. It also alleges he was illegally arrested and had his vehicle illegally searched by the defendants. The document provides details to support each of the 17 counts alleged in the lawsuit.
This document is the plaintiff's response to the defendant's statement of disputed facts in a civil case. It provides 3 key points:
1. The defendants' motions contain statements intended to mislead the court about the plaintiff's lack of legal experience and understanding.
2. The court needs to carefully examine all documents in the case to see how the defendants have structured false statements.
3. The defendant continues to make false statements and has not addressed issues raised by the plaintiff, showing intent to undermine the court.
This document is the plaintiff's response to the defendant's statement of disputed facts in a civil case. It provides 3 key points:
1. The defendants' motions contain statements intended to mislead the court about the plaintiff's lack of legal experience and understanding.
2. The court needs to carefully examine all documents in the case to see how the defendants have structured false statements.
3. The defendant continues to make false statements and has not addressed issues raised by the plaintiff, showing intent to undermine the court.
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to supplement their previous motion to compel document production from the defendants.
2. The plaintiff argues that the defendants have withheld important documents and provided vague responses to interrogatories.
3. The plaintiff seeks to compel the defendants to fully respond to discovery requests regarding restrictions on the plaintiff's religious activities while incarcerated at Dania Charters.
Plaintiff's m otio n to supplem en t m otion to com pel second reouest for pr...Cocoselul Inaripat
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to supplement their previous motion to compel document production from the defendants.
2. The plaintiff argues that the defendants have withheld important documents and provided vague responses to interrogatories.
3. The plaintiff seeks to compel the defendants to fully respond to discovery requests regarding restrictions on the plaintiff's religious activities while incarcerated at Dania Charters facility.
Plaintiff's m otio n to supplem en t m otion to com pel second reouest for pr...Cocoselul Inaripat
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to supplement their previous motion to compel production of documents from the defendants.
2. The plaintiff argues that key documents provided by the defendants were incomplete or altered.
3. The plaintiff seeks to compel full disclosure of documents and names of individuals related to the case from the defendants.
This 3 sentence summary provides the essential information from the document:
The plaintiff filed a supplemental motion arguing that the defendant made false statements to the court about disciplinary actions taken against the plaintiff while he was in federal prison, as records from the county jail system show there were no disciplinary hearings or findings of misconduct during the relevant time period. The plaintiff asserts that the defendant should be held responsible for making false statements that impeded the court's process. Attached to the motion are exhibits from the county jail records that the plaintiff argues contradict the defendant's claims.
This 3 sentence summary provides the essential information from the document:
The plaintiff filed a supplemental motion arguing that the defendant made false statements to the court about disciplinary actions taken against the plaintiff while he was in federal prison, as records from the county jail system show there were no disciplinary hearings or findings of misconduct during the relevant time period. The plaintiff asserts that the defendant should be held responsible for making false statements that impeded the court's process. Attached to the motion are exhibits from the county jail records that the plaintiff argues contradict the defendant's claims.
This document is a supplemental motion filed by the plaintiff in response to the defendant's supplemental motion for summary judgment. It provides additional documents from the Bureau of Prisons' SENTRY system to support the plaintiff's claims. The plaintiff argues that disciplinary hearings were never held and that findings of guilt are not supported by the documents from SENTRY. The plaintiff seeks to have the court consider these additional documents to determine the truth and ensure justice. The motion is submitted with certificates of service.
This document is the plaintiff's response to the defendant's supplemental motion for summary judgment in a civil case. It summarizes the plaintiff's allegations against the defendant halfway house for violating the terms of his home confinement by restricting his phone access. The response argues that granting summary judgment for the defendant would be inappropriate given the factual disputes between the parties. It maintains that the halfway house imposed unauthorized conditions on the plaintiff's phone use beyond what was agreed to in his home confinement agreement.
1. Plaintiff was sentenced to 35 months for conspiracy related to emergency economic programs. He was assigned to a halfway house operated by Defendant Dimas Charities.
2. Dimas Charities was aware of Plaintiff's medical conditions but did not properly accommodate him. They placed strict restrictions on his phone use against the conditions of his home confinement.
3. Plaintiff requests the Court issue an order clarifying the conditions of his home confinement regarding phone use to comply with BOP policy. He argues Dimas Charities exceeded their authority over a federal prisoner.
1. This document outlines the plaintiff's response to the defendant's supplemental motion for summary judgment in a civil case.
2. The plaintiff argues that striking the plaintiff's pleadings would prevent the court from considering key documents and harm the plaintiff in future cases.
3. The document provides background on the plaintiff's medical conditions and placement at the defendant's halfway house facility before responding to the defendant's legal arguments.
1. This document outlines the plaintiff's response to the defendant's supplemental motion for summary judgment in a civil case.
2. The plaintiff argues that striking the plaintiff's pleadings would prevent the court from considering key documents and harm the plaintiff in future cases.
3. The document provides background on the plaintiff's medical conditions and placement at the defendant's halfway house facility before responding to the defendant's legal arguments.
This order strikes Plaintiff's statement of material facts in support of their motion for summary judgment. The court found that Plaintiff's statement failed to comply with the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Specifically, the statement contained more than one assertion of fact per numbered paragraph and did not contain citations to the record to support the assertions of material facts. If Plaintiff refiles their statement of facts, it must comply with the rules by containing only one assertion per numbered paragraph and including citations to support each assertion. Failure to comply will result in the court striking the refiled statement and motion for summary judgment.
This order strikes Plaintiff's statement of material facts in support of their motion for summary judgment. The court found that Plaintiff's statement failed to comply with the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Specifically, the statement contained more than one assertion of fact per numbered paragraph and did not contain citations to the record to support the assertions of material facts. If Plaintiff refiles their statement of facts, it must comply with the rules by containing only one assertion per numbered paragraph and including citations to support each assertion. Failure to comply will result in the court striking the refiled statement and motion for summary judgment.
This order strikes Plaintiff's statement of material facts in support of their motion for summary judgment. The court found that Plaintiff's statement failed to comply with the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Specifically, the statement contained more than one assertion of fact per numbered paragraph and did not contain citations to the record to support the assertions made. If Plaintiff re-files their statement of facts, it must comply with the Federal and Local Rules by containing only one assertion of fact per numbered paragraph and including citations to support each assertion. Failure to do so will result in the court striking the re-filed statement and motion for summary judgment.
This order strikes Plaintiff's statement of material facts in support of their motion for summary judgment. The court found that Plaintiff's statement failed to comply with both the Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Specifically, the statement contained more than one assertion of fact per numbered paragraph and did not include citations to the record to support each material fact asserted. If Plaintiff refiles their statement of facts, it must comply with the rules or the court will strike the refiled statement and motion for summary judgment.
Mtion to compel production of documents and electronically stored informationsCocoselul Inaripat
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to compel the defendant to produce documents and electronically stored information in response to discovery requests.
2. The defendant refused to produce any documents, claiming that their release would be prohibited by the Federal Bureau of Prisons.
3. The plaintiff argues that the defendant's refusal to produce documents in response to lawful discovery requests is an attempt to cover up criminal acts and liability for abuse at the detention center.
Mtion to compel production of documents and electronically stored informationsCocoselul Inaripat
The plaintiff filed a motion to compel the production of documents and electronically stored information from the defendants. The defendants had failed to produce any documents in response to the plaintiff's requests. The plaintiff argued that the defendants' claim that the documents are prohibited from disclosure by the Federal Bureau of Prisons is an exaggeration and that the documents requested are relevant to the case. The motion discusses the broad scope of permissible discovery under the rules and argues that the defendants must demonstrate specifically which documents are prohibited from disclosure.
Plaintiff's reply in brief in response to defendant's response brief and in s...Cocoselul Inaripat
Plaintiff filed a reply brief in response to Defendants' response brief and in support of Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. The reply brief rebuts Defendants' arguments, provides additional clarification to Plaintiff's claims, and adds context not originally made in Plaintiff's complaint or motion for summary judgment. On October 20, 2011, while residing at Dimas House, Plaintiff was arrested by U.S. Marshals and transported to FDC Miami without being charged and without due process of law.
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
More Related Content
Similar to Plaintiff's response to defendant's motion to dismeiss action for failure to appear at deposition
This document outlines a lawsuit filed by the plaintiff (referred to as the "Movant") against Dimas Charters Inc. and several employees. It alleges 17 counts including improper treatment, denial of religious freedom, illegal search and seizure of property, and incarceration without due process. Specifically, it claims the Movant was constantly harassed and denied medical accommodation while housed at a halfway house run by Dimas Charters. It also alleges he was illegally arrested and had his vehicle illegally searched by the defendants. The document provides details to support each of the 17 counts alleged in the lawsuit.
This document is the plaintiff's response to the defendant's statement of disputed facts in a civil case. It provides 3 key points:
1. The defendants' motions contain statements intended to mislead the court about the plaintiff's lack of legal experience and understanding.
2. The court needs to carefully examine all documents in the case to see how the defendants have structured false statements.
3. The defendant continues to make false statements and has not addressed issues raised by the plaintiff, showing intent to undermine the court.
This document is the plaintiff's response to the defendant's statement of disputed facts in a civil case. It provides 3 key points:
1. The defendants' motions contain statements intended to mislead the court about the plaintiff's lack of legal experience and understanding.
2. The court needs to carefully examine all documents in the case to see how the defendants have structured false statements.
3. The defendant continues to make false statements and has not addressed issues raised by the plaintiff, showing intent to undermine the court.
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to supplement their previous motion to compel document production from the defendants.
2. The plaintiff argues that the defendants have withheld important documents and provided vague responses to interrogatories.
3. The plaintiff seeks to compel the defendants to fully respond to discovery requests regarding restrictions on the plaintiff's religious activities while incarcerated at Dania Charters.
Plaintiff's m otio n to supplem en t m otion to com pel second reouest for pr...Cocoselul Inaripat
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to supplement their previous motion to compel document production from the defendants.
2. The plaintiff argues that the defendants have withheld important documents and provided vague responses to interrogatories.
3. The plaintiff seeks to compel the defendants to fully respond to discovery requests regarding restrictions on the plaintiff's religious activities while incarcerated at Dania Charters facility.
Plaintiff's m otio n to supplem en t m otion to com pel second reouest for pr...Cocoselul Inaripat
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to supplement their previous motion to compel production of documents from the defendants.
2. The plaintiff argues that key documents provided by the defendants were incomplete or altered.
3. The plaintiff seeks to compel full disclosure of documents and names of individuals related to the case from the defendants.
This 3 sentence summary provides the essential information from the document:
The plaintiff filed a supplemental motion arguing that the defendant made false statements to the court about disciplinary actions taken against the plaintiff while he was in federal prison, as records from the county jail system show there were no disciplinary hearings or findings of misconduct during the relevant time period. The plaintiff asserts that the defendant should be held responsible for making false statements that impeded the court's process. Attached to the motion are exhibits from the county jail records that the plaintiff argues contradict the defendant's claims.
This 3 sentence summary provides the essential information from the document:
The plaintiff filed a supplemental motion arguing that the defendant made false statements to the court about disciplinary actions taken against the plaintiff while he was in federal prison, as records from the county jail system show there were no disciplinary hearings or findings of misconduct during the relevant time period. The plaintiff asserts that the defendant should be held responsible for making false statements that impeded the court's process. Attached to the motion are exhibits from the county jail records that the plaintiff argues contradict the defendant's claims.
This document is a supplemental motion filed by the plaintiff in response to the defendant's supplemental motion for summary judgment. It provides additional documents from the Bureau of Prisons' SENTRY system to support the plaintiff's claims. The plaintiff argues that disciplinary hearings were never held and that findings of guilt are not supported by the documents from SENTRY. The plaintiff seeks to have the court consider these additional documents to determine the truth and ensure justice. The motion is submitted with certificates of service.
This document is the plaintiff's response to the defendant's supplemental motion for summary judgment in a civil case. It summarizes the plaintiff's allegations against the defendant halfway house for violating the terms of his home confinement by restricting his phone access. The response argues that granting summary judgment for the defendant would be inappropriate given the factual disputes between the parties. It maintains that the halfway house imposed unauthorized conditions on the plaintiff's phone use beyond what was agreed to in his home confinement agreement.
1. Plaintiff was sentenced to 35 months for conspiracy related to emergency economic programs. He was assigned to a halfway house operated by Defendant Dimas Charities.
2. Dimas Charities was aware of Plaintiff's medical conditions but did not properly accommodate him. They placed strict restrictions on his phone use against the conditions of his home confinement.
3. Plaintiff requests the Court issue an order clarifying the conditions of his home confinement regarding phone use to comply with BOP policy. He argues Dimas Charities exceeded their authority over a federal prisoner.
1. This document outlines the plaintiff's response to the defendant's supplemental motion for summary judgment in a civil case.
2. The plaintiff argues that striking the plaintiff's pleadings would prevent the court from considering key documents and harm the plaintiff in future cases.
3. The document provides background on the plaintiff's medical conditions and placement at the defendant's halfway house facility before responding to the defendant's legal arguments.
1. This document outlines the plaintiff's response to the defendant's supplemental motion for summary judgment in a civil case.
2. The plaintiff argues that striking the plaintiff's pleadings would prevent the court from considering key documents and harm the plaintiff in future cases.
3. The document provides background on the plaintiff's medical conditions and placement at the defendant's halfway house facility before responding to the defendant's legal arguments.
This order strikes Plaintiff's statement of material facts in support of their motion for summary judgment. The court found that Plaintiff's statement failed to comply with the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Specifically, the statement contained more than one assertion of fact per numbered paragraph and did not contain citations to the record to support the assertions of material facts. If Plaintiff refiles their statement of facts, it must comply with the rules by containing only one assertion per numbered paragraph and including citations to support each assertion. Failure to comply will result in the court striking the refiled statement and motion for summary judgment.
This order strikes Plaintiff's statement of material facts in support of their motion for summary judgment. The court found that Plaintiff's statement failed to comply with the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Specifically, the statement contained more than one assertion of fact per numbered paragraph and did not contain citations to the record to support the assertions of material facts. If Plaintiff refiles their statement of facts, it must comply with the rules by containing only one assertion per numbered paragraph and including citations to support each assertion. Failure to comply will result in the court striking the refiled statement and motion for summary judgment.
This order strikes Plaintiff's statement of material facts in support of their motion for summary judgment. The court found that Plaintiff's statement failed to comply with the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Specifically, the statement contained more than one assertion of fact per numbered paragraph and did not contain citations to the record to support the assertions made. If Plaintiff re-files their statement of facts, it must comply with the Federal and Local Rules by containing only one assertion of fact per numbered paragraph and including citations to support each assertion. Failure to do so will result in the court striking the re-filed statement and motion for summary judgment.
This order strikes Plaintiff's statement of material facts in support of their motion for summary judgment. The court found that Plaintiff's statement failed to comply with both the Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Specifically, the statement contained more than one assertion of fact per numbered paragraph and did not include citations to the record to support each material fact asserted. If Plaintiff refiles their statement of facts, it must comply with the rules or the court will strike the refiled statement and motion for summary judgment.
Mtion to compel production of documents and electronically stored informationsCocoselul Inaripat
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to compel the defendant to produce documents and electronically stored information in response to discovery requests.
2. The defendant refused to produce any documents, claiming that their release would be prohibited by the Federal Bureau of Prisons.
3. The plaintiff argues that the defendant's refusal to produce documents in response to lawful discovery requests is an attempt to cover up criminal acts and liability for abuse at the detention center.
Mtion to compel production of documents and electronically stored informationsCocoselul Inaripat
The plaintiff filed a motion to compel the production of documents and electronically stored information from the defendants. The defendants had failed to produce any documents in response to the plaintiff's requests. The plaintiff argued that the defendants' claim that the documents are prohibited from disclosure by the Federal Bureau of Prisons is an exaggeration and that the documents requested are relevant to the case. The motion discusses the broad scope of permissible discovery under the rules and argues that the defendants must demonstrate specifically which documents are prohibited from disclosure.
Plaintiff's reply in brief in response to defendant's response brief and in s...Cocoselul Inaripat
Plaintiff filed a reply brief in response to Defendants' response brief and in support of Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. The reply brief rebuts Defendants' arguments, provides additional clarification to Plaintiff's claims, and adds context not originally made in Plaintiff's complaint or motion for summary judgment. On October 20, 2011, while residing at Dimas House, Plaintiff was arrested by U.S. Marshals and transported to FDC Miami without being charged and without due process of law.
Similar to Plaintiff's response to defendant's motion to dismeiss action for failure to appear at deposition (20)
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
The document discusses the results of a study on the effects of exercise on memory and thinking abilities in older adults. The study found that regular exercise can help reduce the decline in thinking abilities that often occurs with age. Older adults who exercised regularly performed better on cognitive tests and brain scans showed they had greater activity in important areas for memory and learning compared to less active peers.
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Just...Cocoselul Inaripat
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Crominals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World
The United States government conducted a large raid involving over 30 agents from numerous agencies on Traian Bujduveanu's residence to seize assets. The lead prosecutors claimed in court that the assets were worth over $100,000, but they ended up being less than $10,000 in value, consisting of antique aircraft parts. The massive raid was unnecessary and terrorized Bujduveanu's 84-year-old blind mother, who was sent to the hospital. Witnesses state that Bujduveanu had been under surveillance for over a year before the raid. The government's actions seem aimed at justifying the expenses of the investigation rather than appropriately addressing the matter.
This document lists the names of various government agencies and individuals, including Jeb Bush, the Department of Justice, ICE agents, US Attorneys, Assistant Attorney Generals, FBI agents, and others. It also references concepts like government conspiracies, revolutions in Romania and Iran, corruption in government, and crimes against humanity.
What is an RPA CoE? Session 1 – CoE VisionDianaGray10
In the first session, we will review the organization's vision and how this has an impact on the COE Structure.
Topics covered:
• The role of a steering committee
• How do the organization’s priorities determine CoE Structure?
Speaker:
Chris Bolin, Senior Intelligent Automation Architect Anika Systems
Your One-Stop Shop for Python Success: Top 10 US Python Development Providersakankshawande
Simplify your search for a reliable Python development partner! This list presents the top 10 trusted US providers offering comprehensive Python development services, ensuring your project's success from conception to completion.
Ivanti’s Patch Tuesday breakdown goes beyond patching your applications and brings you the intelligence and guidance needed to prioritize where to focus your attention first. Catch early analysis on our Ivanti blog, then join industry expert Chris Goettl for the Patch Tuesday Webinar Event. There we’ll do a deep dive into each of the bulletins and give guidance on the risks associated with the newly-identified vulnerabilities.
zkStudyClub - LatticeFold: A Lattice-based Folding Scheme and its Application...Alex Pruden
Folding is a recent technique for building efficient recursive SNARKs. Several elegant folding protocols have been proposed, such as Nova, Supernova, Hypernova, Protostar, and others. However, all of them rely on an additively homomorphic commitment scheme based on discrete log, and are therefore not post-quantum secure. In this work we present LatticeFold, the first lattice-based folding protocol based on the Module SIS problem. This folding protocol naturally leads to an efficient recursive lattice-based SNARK and an efficient PCD scheme. LatticeFold supports folding low-degree relations, such as R1CS, as well as high-degree relations, such as CCS. The key challenge is to construct a secure folding protocol that works with the Ajtai commitment scheme. The difficulty, is ensuring that extracted witnesses are low norm through many rounds of folding. We present a novel technique using the sumcheck protocol to ensure that extracted witnesses are always low norm no matter how many rounds of folding are used. Our evaluation of the final proof system suggests that it is as performant as Hypernova, while providing post-quantum security.
Paper Link: https://eprint.iacr.org/2024/257
Dandelion Hashtable: beyond billion requests per second on a commodity serverAntonios Katsarakis
This slide deck presents DLHT, a concurrent in-memory hashtable. Despite efforts to optimize hashtables, that go as far as sacrificing core functionality, state-of-the-art designs still incur multiple memory accesses per request and block request processing in three cases. First, most hashtables block while waiting for data to be retrieved from memory. Second, open-addressing designs, which represent the current state-of-the-art, either cannot free index slots on deletes or must block all requests to do so. Third, index resizes block every request until all objects are copied to the new index. Defying folklore wisdom, DLHT forgoes open-addressing and adopts a fully-featured and memory-aware closed-addressing design based on bounded cache-line-chaining. This design offers lock-free index operations and deletes that free slots instantly, (2) completes most requests with a single memory access, (3) utilizes software prefetching to hide memory latencies, and (4) employs a novel non-blocking and parallel resizing. In a commodity server and a memory-resident workload, DLHT surpasses 1.6B requests per second and provides 3.5x (12x) the throughput of the state-of-the-art closed-addressing (open-addressing) resizable hashtable on Gets (Deletes).
Building Production Ready Search Pipelines with Spark and MilvusZilliz
Spark is the widely used ETL tool for processing, indexing and ingesting data to serving stack for search. Milvus is the production-ready open-source vector database. In this talk we will show how to use Spark to process unstructured data to extract vector representations, and push the vectors to Milvus vector database for search serving.
For the full video of this presentation, please visit: https://www.edge-ai-vision.com/2024/06/how-axelera-ai-uses-digital-compute-in-memory-to-deliver-fast-and-energy-efficient-computer-vision-a-presentation-from-axelera-ai/
Bram Verhoef, Head of Machine Learning at Axelera AI, presents the “How Axelera AI Uses Digital Compute-in-memory to Deliver Fast and Energy-efficient Computer Vision” tutorial at the May 2024 Embedded Vision Summit.
As artificial intelligence inference transitions from cloud environments to edge locations, computer vision applications achieve heightened responsiveness, reliability and privacy. This migration, however, introduces the challenge of operating within the stringent confines of resource constraints typical at the edge, including small form factors, low energy budgets and diminished memory and computational capacities. Axelera AI addresses these challenges through an innovative approach of performing digital computations within memory itself. This technique facilitates the realization of high-performance, energy-efficient and cost-effective computer vision capabilities at the thin and thick edge, extending the frontier of what is achievable with current technologies.
In this presentation, Verhoef unveils his company’s pioneering chip technology and demonstrates its capacity to deliver exceptional frames-per-second performance across a range of standard computer vision networks typical of applications in security, surveillance and the industrial sector. This shows that advanced computer vision can be accessible and efficient, even at the very edge of our technological ecosystem.
How to Interpret Trends in the Kalyan Rajdhani Mix Chart.pdfChart Kalyan
A Mix Chart displays historical data of numbers in a graphical or tabular form. The Kalyan Rajdhani Mix Chart specifically shows the results of a sequence of numbers over different periods.
Digital Marketing Trends in 2024 | Guide for Staying AheadWask
https://www.wask.co/ebooks/digital-marketing-trends-in-2024
Feeling lost in the digital marketing whirlwind of 2024? Technology is changing, consumer habits are evolving, and staying ahead of the curve feels like a never-ending pursuit. This e-book is your compass. Dive into actionable insights to handle the complexities of modern marketing. From hyper-personalization to the power of user-generated content, learn how to build long-term relationships with your audience and unlock the secrets to success in the ever-shifting digital landscape.
Introduction of Cybersecurity with OSS at Code Europe 2024Hiroshi SHIBATA
I develop the Ruby programming language, RubyGems, and Bundler, which are package managers for Ruby. Today, I will introduce how to enhance the security of your application using open-source software (OSS) examples from Ruby and RubyGems.
The first topic is CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures). I have published CVEs many times. But what exactly is a CVE? I'll provide a basic understanding of CVEs and explain how to detect and handle vulnerabilities in OSS.
Next, let's discuss package managers. Package managers play a critical role in the OSS ecosystem. I'll explain how to manage library dependencies in your application.
I'll share insights into how the Ruby and RubyGems core team works to keep our ecosystem safe. By the end of this talk, you'll have a better understanding of how to safeguard your code.
TrustArc Webinar - 2024 Global Privacy SurveyTrustArc
How does your privacy program stack up against your peers? What challenges are privacy teams tackling and prioritizing in 2024?
In the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey, we asked over 1,800 global privacy professionals and business executives to share their perspectives on the current state of privacy inside and outside of their organizations. This year’s report focused on emerging areas of importance for privacy and compliance professionals, including considerations and implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, building brand trust, and different approaches for achieving higher privacy competence scores.
See how organizational priorities and strategic approaches to data security and privacy are evolving around the globe.
This webinar will review:
- The top 10 privacy insights from the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey
- The top challenges for privacy leaders, practitioners, and organizations in 2024
- Key themes to consider in developing and maintaining your privacy program
HCL Notes und Domino Lizenzkostenreduzierung in der Welt von DLAUpanagenda
Webinar Recording: https://www.panagenda.com/webinars/hcl-notes-und-domino-lizenzkostenreduzierung-in-der-welt-von-dlau/
DLAU und die Lizenzen nach dem CCB- und CCX-Modell sind für viele in der HCL-Community seit letztem Jahr ein heißes Thema. Als Notes- oder Domino-Kunde haben Sie vielleicht mit unerwartet hohen Benutzerzahlen und Lizenzgebühren zu kämpfen. Sie fragen sich vielleicht, wie diese neue Art der Lizenzierung funktioniert und welchen Nutzen sie Ihnen bringt. Vor allem wollen Sie sicherlich Ihr Budget einhalten und Kosten sparen, wo immer möglich. Das verstehen wir und wir möchten Ihnen dabei helfen!
Wir erklären Ihnen, wie Sie häufige Konfigurationsprobleme lösen können, die dazu führen können, dass mehr Benutzer gezählt werden als nötig, und wie Sie überflüssige oder ungenutzte Konten identifizieren und entfernen können, um Geld zu sparen. Es gibt auch einige Ansätze, die zu unnötigen Ausgaben führen können, z. B. wenn ein Personendokument anstelle eines Mail-Ins für geteilte Mailboxen verwendet wird. Wir zeigen Ihnen solche Fälle und deren Lösungen. Und natürlich erklären wir Ihnen das neue Lizenzmodell.
Nehmen Sie an diesem Webinar teil, bei dem HCL-Ambassador Marc Thomas und Gastredner Franz Walder Ihnen diese neue Welt näherbringen. Es vermittelt Ihnen die Tools und das Know-how, um den Überblick zu bewahren. Sie werden in der Lage sein, Ihre Kosten durch eine optimierte Domino-Konfiguration zu reduzieren und auch in Zukunft gering zu halten.
Diese Themen werden behandelt
- Reduzierung der Lizenzkosten durch Auffinden und Beheben von Fehlkonfigurationen und überflüssigen Konten
- Wie funktionieren CCB- und CCX-Lizenzen wirklich?
- Verstehen des DLAU-Tools und wie man es am besten nutzt
- Tipps für häufige Problembereiche, wie z. B. Team-Postfächer, Funktions-/Testbenutzer usw.
- Praxisbeispiele und Best Practices zum sofortigen Umsetzen
HCL Notes und Domino Lizenzkostenreduzierung in der Welt von DLAU
Plaintiff's response to defendant's motion to dismeiss action for failure to appear at deposition
1. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 1 of 43
h
I THE I NI
N J TED STATES DISTRI COURT FOR
CT
TH E SO UTHERN DISTRI OF FLORI
CT DA
CA SE N O. lI ZOI CI SEI SI ONTON
: - ZO- V- TZ/ M
TRAI BUJDU VEAN U,
AN
Pl ntF,
ai i
VS.
Dlsm s cl txm r s,m c. ANA GI
rm , SPERT,
DEREK THOM A S and LA SI
IANDA Ao o S
Def nt
enda s.
/
PLA I FF' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT' M OTION TO DISM SS ACTION FO R
NTI S S
FA ILURE TO APPEAR AT D EPO SITION
Pli ifTrin Bud a u, oSe, eeRe kn w a G a ' flsti rs ns t
antf aa juven Pr h ra r o s t nt' ie hs epo e o
Mov ,
t Def nda ' M oton t Dim isActon f Faiur t AppearatDe ii puruantt
he e nts i o s s i or l e o postons s o
Fe ea Rult)o Ci l ocdue3 4)a d45b()d a g ,nds e a f lws
d rl es f viPr e r 0094 n ()c() ndt a uts s olo :
l. On December06,2011t Def
he endant fl aM oton t Dim i Acton f Fa lze t
s ied i o s ss i or ilr o
Appe ra De sto ( ume #78 .
a t po iin Doc nt )
2. TheM ovantacknow ldgest tt Def mtsc ms a tm pt t s
e ha he endr ' ot el te ed o chedul e
de ii on t f l ng occasons Ocober 1 , 2011,November11 2011,and
postons he olowi i ; t 0 ,
De e r5, 1( mpost Exhbi 1t Dee a smoin .
cmbe 201 Co ie i t o fnd nt to )
3. TheM ovantf he acu owl
urt r edgest he t sandst i t ofs d de tons
hat mder t he mporance ai posii
f t publc' i er ti expe tousr ol i ofltgaton, t cour' need t m anage
or he i s nt es n dii es uton ii i he ts o
isdocke s.
t t
4. I i msar ul oft st sandi t t M ova m ade ever ate ptt c
ts es t hi mder t ng hat he nt y tm o omm uni e
cat
vi em a l bet
a is ween t M ovantand t Def
he he endantscouns ast hi i biiyt make
' el o s na lt o
atn t d po iinsd t li do u ntda d c u t oc ee il se ( e
te d he e sto ue o ls c me e n o r d k td lne s s Se
Co ost Ex bt1t ti moi )
mp ie hii o hs ton .
Furhe m or asevi i t back and f t e ai cores
t r e, dent n he orh m l r pondences, t Def
he endants
'
c ms lma nor q s f c re me c l cl nst j tf t M o n ' a s rin
ot e de e ue t or u rnt dia do l t o usiy he va ts se to
me
t he wasuna e t atendawhi t M ova w oul have be gl t pr de, s h
hat bl o t ch he nt d en ad o ovi uc
t s i docl e aton woul r ul i eihe ar chedulng oft M ova ' de ii
hat a d lm nt i d es t n t r es i he nts poston
t a tme t thewasphyscaly abl t appea f hi deposton,ors t ot r
o i ha i l eo r or s ii uch hat he
2. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 2 of 43
a rnge nsf rde igt M o n c ul ber a o bl ma ei)vi tlp neo
ra me t o posn he va t o d e s na y d e a ee ho r
cos cr uit lvii ( eCo ieEx bi 1t t i moi )
l e ic t ee son Se mpost hi t o hs ton .
6. l i notclarast why t Def
ts e o he endantscot
' mselwoul quesi t M ovantshealh as
d ton he ' t
hewasorgi l r eas fom t Def ntsHalway Hous t hom econf
i naly el ed r he enda ' f eo mem ent
due t se a m edi condii nam el bei di os wih He ii C i ecton,
o ver l cal tons, y ng ar ed t patts nf i
Cir i oft lver dibet ,c oni f tgue,de esson,t ombocyt ni as t
rhos s he i , a es hr c a i pr i hr ope a, cies,
l pl el cot ,anpos i e lvercanceri cat by elvat al f opr ei l s
ow at et mt sbl i ndi ed e ed pha-et ot n evel
s wn i blodts a d Mllr s ls( eo iial o ntsCo ai Exhi tA)
ho n o e t n t e ut Se rgn M va ' mpl nt bi .
7. Gi t f t t onl s eque c
ven he act hat he y ubs nt hangest t M ovantshealh condii has
o he ' t ton
been onesi whih hi healh hasf t rdet i atd,and t t M ovantbele i
n c s t urhe eror e hat he i ved n
good f t t t Def nda ' and t rcouns we e awa e oft e ciclms
aih hat he e nts hei el r r hes r l tnces a , nd
f t mor t tDef
urher e ha endantscot eldi notr
' ms d eques any updaed m edi r cor fom
t t cal e ds r
t M ovanti catng acha i hi cur e m edi condii he di notpr de
he ndi i nge n s r nt cal ton, d ovi
ftt pr ofhi c tonsasi wasnotr
trher oof s ondii t equesed orw ava ed unde t
t l nt r he
ci tmstnces.
rcl a
8. The Def ntsc eli hi m oton as e st tbe us t M ovantwasabl t
enda ' ouns n s i s rt ha ca e he eo
appea atm e aton,pr par li M oton f Slmm ar J
r di i e ed ls i or l y udgm e ,Stt m entofFact
nt a e s,
and Revied St em e sofFact,t M ovants d ha bee a e t m a i t t
s at nt s he houl ve n bl o ke t o he
schedul de ii ;howe t sas eri doesnott i o consder ton t f t
ed postons ver hi s ton ake nt i a i hat or he
f t l ts n mont ,t A s t t M ovanthasbeen batlng hascaus hi
or he as eve hs he cies he ti ed s
physcinst gi hi a 50/ cha ofs vi ng hi s
i a o ve m 50 nce ur vi s chedul s ger whi hasbeen
ed ur y, ch
r chedul duet hi exa bat m edi condii a t f t thehasus what
es ed o s cer ed cal ton, nd he act ha ed
ltl r ani e gy hehad r m ai ng t pr pa e hi m otonsand courtdoclm ent
ite em i ng ner e ni o e r s i l s.
( eCo st Ex bt2t t i moi n .
Se mpo ie hii o hs to )
9. Fe eal e s o Cii Pr c d e3 ( )4)d aswihtea miitain o ade ii
d r Rult) f v l o e ur 0 b ( e l t h d n sr to f poston
when a pary i physcaly t et atend a s heduld deposii i pr desaddii
t s i l mabl o t c e ton t ovi tonal
avenuesf obt ni t i or aton t a evesbot t Def ntsneed f
or ai ng he nf m i hat chi h he enda ' or
i or aton i r gar t t dicover and t M ovantsphyscalabiiy t compl
nf m i n e ds o he s y he ' i lt o y:
tBy Remot M eans Thepari m a si at
t e . tes y tpul e--ort c may on m oton
he ourt i
or r t a deposii bet n by t ephoneorot r
de- hat ton ake el her emot means Fort
e . he
pu pos oft sr l an Ruls28a , ( )( ) a 3 b)( ) t de ostontk s
r e hi ue d e () 37 a 2 , nd 7( 1,he p ii a e
pl wher t de
ace e he ponentans rst quesi '
we he tons.'
10.n i howe woul have r quied a courtor ,whih t Def
s ver d e r der c he endantscouns was
' el
unwil t a q r Sub vso ()(. l o d rt fcltt ls e pe i pr e ur ,
li o c uie. diiin b 4) n r e o a iiae e s x nsve oc d es
ng .
pr son i made f t r di oft tm ony by ot t senon phi m eans e. ,
ovii s or he ecor ng esi her han t c - g.
by m ec c ,el toni orphot a c means Be et e met
hanial ec r c, ogr phi . caus hes hodsgi rs t
ve ie o
pr e sofacc ac and tusworhi s t pary t ng t deposton i r r d t
oblm ur y r t t nes , he t aki he ii s equie o
appl f a c tor .The or i t s f how t t tm ony i t be r de
y or our der der s o peciy he esi s o ecor d,
pr er and fl and i may cont n what raddii lsa eguar t cour deem s
es vedo ied, t ai eve tona f ds he t
neces ar W hih l t M ovantt quesi whet rt Def
s y. c eads he o ton he he endanttul quesi d
r y tone
t M ovantshealh condii orwhet rt swassm pl as
he ' t ton, he hi i y ubver ve t tct a d t
si ac i o voi he
3. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 3 of 43
cour a es ng M ovant sPetton f Slmm ar J
t ddr si ' ii or l y udgm entast w e e f f of
hey r ear ul
stengt oft M ovantsc
r h he ' ase.
l . e37d)a h ie t dititc u tor q r a atr e 'opa t ra on bl
1 Rul ( utorz s he src o r t e uie n to n y ' y he e s a e
t
e p n e,n ldn atme sfe, a sdb tefi r'o i cin t a p a a a
x e ss icu ig t y 'e s c ue y h al e' ft l to p e r t
o u s e
de oston,' ls tec u tidsta tef tr wa sbsl ilyj tfe o t tote
p ii ' e s h o r fn h th mlle s u t al usiid rha h r
un mt
cic msa e ma a a r o e ns st us ' e Rul 37 2) whihha te
r u tnc s ke n wa d f xpe e mj t'Und r e 09( , c s h
s meln a a Rue3 d ,hebu d nofs wi s bsa ta j tt to a s ca
a a gu ge s l 7( ) t r e ho ng u tn ilusikain nd pe il
cicum s a
r t ncesi on t pary bei s tone Falt F Br ng Cor v.M il Br ng
s he t ng anc i d. s a ewi p. ler ewi
Co.7 F.d 7 ,7 4 ( t Ci.9 ) W etusa y tes mebtd nofpr ff Rul
, 02 2 70 8 9h r1 83 . h ppl h a tr e oo or e
3 d) Si e M o nti teo he ei t c s fcngs n tons t btd nofpr ff
7( . nc , va s h ne r n he a e a i a c i ,he tr e oo or
pr vi t a s bsa ilusi tonf sncinsflsonteDee a t a t i
o ng h t u tnta j tt i or a to al h fnd n s nd her
ka
c t e, n ato j teDee d n' c t e h spo e hmsl t b a e p ri te
omsla d l u h h fn a ts omsl a r v n i efo e n x etn h
h
ar ofl w ,hi a ht t m ake m a e i satm ent off st dst M ovantsmedi l
ea a s bi y o t ral t e s act owar he ' ca
condii and a lt t makei t de ii i i quesi
ton biiy o t o postons s n ton.
1 Thecourt ha a s f md i Hyde& Dr h v.Ke t R.Ba t :
2. s ve l o ot n at nneh ker hat
t ec
ç annotc ude t each oft a l ntc por i wass t i l
W oncl hat he ppela or atons ubsantaly
jsiidi fin t atn ted p st n . l K'n 'fi r t a p a wa
u t e n al j o te d h e o io s Ony u gs al e o p er s
f i i u
s bsa ilyj tfe Alh ug weha de ln dt r a h teme isofte
u tntal uslid. t o h ve cie o e c h rt h
ag me th t u jwa e c sdfo atn igted p st n frh at
ru n ta K'n s x u e rm t dn h e o io s o e l
e i h
r as ,we do decl t tK'mg had,att l t agood f t diput conce ni
e ons de ha t he eas, aih s e r ng
teq et no wh te h wa o l ae t a p a i l h o hssro sin s.
h u si f eh r e s bi td o y e rn i t f i eiu l es
o g g l
Hewa t rf r s bsa tal j tte i fil t a pe ra ted p iin. d.
s he eo e u tn ily usi d n alng o p a t h e osto l
i
(nf c hes bs q nl de ofb anc n e) Ho v r a d sus e a ve no
1 a t u e ue ty id r i a c r. we e , s ic sd bo , ne
oft ot cor a i have agood f t diput conce i t rf l est
he her por tons aih s e m ng hei aiur o
appear Exce f K'mg,Hyde& Dr h hasf l t show t tisclent we e
. pt or t at aied o ha t i s r
s bsa tal j tte i vi aig t c r' dic v r or r .Hyd a d Drt v.
u tn ily usi d n oltn he ou t s o e y de s ( e n ah
i s
Ke t R. k r e a ( F.d 11 :.
nneh Ba e , t l 24 3 62 ' '
13.I t Def nda ' c elwastul convi
f he e nts ouns r y ncedt t M ova w asavoi ngt r
hat he nt di hei
re tf dicove y vi deposton,t coul ha e ci e t rrght unde Feder
ques or s r a ii hey d ve xer s d hei i s r al
Rul ofCii Pr c d e45( ( )d a dt a fld aSu oe af rDe ii i whih
e vl o e ur b)c( ) n g nd ie bp n o poston,n c
t cour woul is a Comm and t Ate a De ton. Thi woul bedonei a
he t d s ue o tnd posii s d n n
e fr t ()1 Av dig Un eBu d n o Ex n e S cins A pa t o a t n y
fo to c ( ) oi n du r e r pe s : an to . ry r tor e
r ponsi e f is ng and s vi a s
es bl or s ui er ng ubpoenam ustt r ona e sepst a d
ake eas bl t o voi
i igt ueb d n o e pe eonape s n s b e tt t s poe . eis n c u t
mposn md ur e r x ns ro u j c o he ub na Th suig o r
mus enf cet sdut a i pos a a opra es i whih may i ude l t
t or hi y nd m e n ppr it ancton- c ncl os
ear ngsand r onabl atom e sf --on a pa t orator who f l t compl I
ni eas e t y' ees ry t ney ais o y. n
f l ng t r esofci lpr edur t cour woul i s and or f contm pti
olowi he ul vi oc e, he t d s ue der or e n
whih t is ng courtmay hol i cont
c he s ui dn empta per on who,ha ng been s ved,f is
s vi er al
wihoutadequa eexc e t obey t s
t t us o he ubpoena.
1 Gi t f tt D e endantscot lknow st tt y woul nothave m e t bur
4. ven he ac hat f ' mse ha he d t he den
ofpr r quii t cour t is a s
oof e rng he t o s ue ubpoe f t M ovantt appeari lghtoft
na or he o n i he
crtcalnat e ofhi healh condii t chos i t ad t cicum ve t spr s a
ii ur s t ton, hey e nse o r nt hi oces , nd
3
4. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 4 of 43
us ot rave
e he nuesofacli vi t sm ea t t i ends t r ng t cour ofis
le ng hi ns o her , hus obbi he t t
powert compelcom planc wih t rtl ofci lpr
o i e t he zes vi ocedure.
1 A diti tcour haswi dicr i t esabls t tm eand pl ce ofdepostons. l r
5. src t de s eton o t ih he i a ii n e
Stnd r M easCo p, 7F. 6 ,6 ( 0 Ci.9 ) c r. imis d 488U. 881
a a d tl r .81 2d 25 28 1 1 r1 87 , e td s s e , S. ,
1 S. d. ,1 2 L. 2 1 ( 98 . r ,hes ca ma tre pli dt tiwas
09 Ct 201 0 Ed.d 71 1 8) Hee t pe il se x ane ha t
nec a y f t Hong K ong depostonst Gkepl e i San Fr s s t tt c
ess r or he ii o ac n ancico o ha he ourt
coul over ee t pr edi snc appe lnt ha dir ded t pr vi deposton
d s he oce ngs i e la s d s egar he e ous ii
or r.Healo not t appelant had done busnes and fl s ti t Norhe n
de s ed hat l s i s ied ui n he t r
Diti ofCalf ni and s d t ef e e ctt ha t a art e. Thes f ct ar
srct ior a houl her or xpe o ve o ppe her e a s e
s ci t e a ih t t r w asno abus ofdicr i i or i t de ii t
um ent o stbls hat he e e s eton n derng he postons o
oc i Sa Fr ncico.
cur n n a s
16.Be or a diti tcourtdim is a compl nt i m us w egh t fve f or pr rbed i
f e sr c s s es ai ,t t i he i act s esc i n
W a dee v. o tn, 0F. 65 6 ( t Ci.9 0) n e ted slc c ur mus
n r r J hnso 9l 2d 2, 56 9h r1 9 . n,h it t o t t
i
fn ta ap rys e a iri i oigted p st n d mo srtdwillesb d
id h t at'b h vo n g rn h e o io s e n tae l n s, a
i l
f ih, rful. j ltdv. nc nHo aMotrCo.76 F.d 1 4,1 41(t
at o a tF esa Ame a nd o , 2 2 33 3 9 h
Ci.9 )
r1 85 .
1 Fi l t ffh f ct r r t diti cour t consderat nae, l ss r
7. naly, he it a or equies he srct t o i ler t es eve e,
s nctonsbef e or rng dim i al To det mi whet t diti c f tled t s
a i or de i s ss . er ne her he s ct ourt ulil hi
o i to t r viwi c ur e mi swheh rt c r ( )e plctydic s e t
blgain,he e e ng o t xa ne t e he ou t 1 x iil s u s d he
f asbiiy ofl sdr tcs tonsa expl ned why ale na i s i woul be
e i lt es asi anc i nd ai tr tve anctons d
i pp o it , 2 i e ntdatmai s n to beo eo d rngds s a, n (
na r prae ( ) mplme e le tve a cins f r r e i imis l a d 3)
war t pary oft pos biiy ofdim is bef eactz l or i i.Adrana,913
ned he t he si lt s s al or taly derng t i
F. at1 2-1 But ' i tdicus i ofale nai i Inneces ar i t diti
2d 41 3. , ' ci s son
expl tr tves s l s y f he srct
cour ac aly ti alem atvesbef eempl ng t uli a es ton ofdim is .'
t m l res t i or oyi he tm t anc i s s al '
M al 833 F. a 132.
one, 2d t
W HERFORE gi t f t Def
ven he act hat endantscounseli t e t es ih m alci i ent
' s mabl o ubls i ous nt ,
ba f t orf ti t M ovantsf l e t a rand beca e t Def
d aih, aul n he ' aiur o ppea us he endantscot el
' ms
r fus t exe cie t l l avaiabl optonsatt rdipos t appr
e es o r s he egaly l e i hei s al o oach t cour t
he to
compelt M ovantt c
he o ompl t M ovantr pectuly r quesst Def
y, he es f l e t hat endantsM oton be
' i
de ed.
ni
Dat Dece be 20,2011
ed: m r Res ctuly s nit ,
pe f l ubr ted
>
/ 'W > pq
TRAI BUJ
AN DUVEAN U,PRO SE
4
5. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 5 of 43
CERTI CATE OF SERVI
FI CE
1he e ceriy t on ora
r by tf hat boutDECEM BER 20, 2011 at eand cor ectcopy oft
nz r he
f egoi doc entw ass ved upon t f l ng vi t Unied St esPos al
or ng um er he olowi a he t at t
Se ce,Fh'tCl sM ai:
rvi s as l
Di as Chartes I ,
sm ii , nc.
141 N. .1 St Avenue
W
Dani FL 33004-
a, 2835
Ana Gi t
sper
Di m asCharii l
s tes,nc.
141 N. .1 St Avenue
W .
Dani FL 33004-
a, 2835
Derek Thom as
Di asChari esl
sm ti ,nc.
141 N. .1 St Avenue
W .
Dani FL 33004-
a, 2835
Lashanda Adam s
Di as Chari esl
sm ti ,nc.
141 N. .1 St Avenue
W .
Dani , 33004-
a FL 2835
Davi S.Chai , quie
d etEs r
At orney f Def
t or endant s
4000 Holyw ood Boul
l evard
Suie 265- h
t Sout
Holywood,FL 33021
l
EXECUTED ON THI 20 DAY OF DECEM BER,2011
S
w '
z // z Z
r // d21*
TRAI BUJ
AN DUVEANU, SE
PR0
5601W .BROW ARD BLVD,
,
PLANTATI FL 33317
ON,
7. Wido Case t iPitMe sg
*
n wsLj Ho1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 71of 2/ 122:
ie mal rn sa e 4/ 43
1 201 01
.
R E: RE:
Davi Chai ( h e@eii era c
d et Dc ait sng lw.om)
Tu 11 2 112: PM
e / 9/ 31
Tr anBudu anu( i a
ai j ve oron v@ms c
n.om)
4 atachment
t s
Her you go.See you M onday.
e
Fr :Tr an Budu eanu ( lo: i av ms c
om ai j v mai oron @ n.om)
t
Sent:Tuesday,November29,2011 2: 4 PM
1
To:Davi Chai
d et
Subj :RE:
ect
DearMr.Chai ,
et
Thank you f youremai.
or l
l ver m uch appear t me as you ar t one qual i t m ak m edi as wel as cour deci ons i t s
t y so e he ied o
f e cal l t si n hi
Case.
As you have cat orcaly r used t pari pat i the dicover pr
œ i l ef o tci e n s y ocess and mor t t you have t aly
e han hat ot l
i ed t t r r
gnor he hid equestf di over Isugges t you wai fr f a cour answerand deci on on al
or sc y, t hat t ist or t si I
pendi motons.
ng i
Bes Regar
t ds
Tr a Buduv u
ain j ean
Fr :Dchai a ei nqeraw.
om et si l com
To:oronav@ msn.
i com
Sub e
j d:
Dat Tue,29 Nov 2011 19: 29 +0000
e: 05:
Si,
r
8. Wid wsLj H 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 8 4/ 2/0112 01
n o Case mal rn Me s e
ie ot iPit sag 1of 43 2:
1 2
Asyouar welen
e l ough t 5l mo i s pepar de l aton an atemptt ar e a he i ( a s y
o e ton , r e car i s d t o gu arng 1 s ume ou
radc r'or srkn y rno ieofh arn ,Iwi s ey Mond f y de ston.
e out der tiig ou tc
s e ig) l e ou
l ay or our po ii
Davi Chai Esqui
d et re
Ei nger Br
si , own,L s,Fr
ewi ankel& Chai ,P.
et A.
Pr dentalCicl * Suie 265-
esi i r e t 5
4000 Hol
lywood Boul d
evar
Hol woo Flrda 330
l d, o i
y 21
p:( 4)894-
95 3043
f ( 4)89 801
: 95 4- 5
dchai @ ei nqeraw .om i
et si l c
www a si l .
ei nqeraw com
Con i i iv and Prvac Notce:The i o m a i con ai i t scommuni ton, icldi if mato c ai i an
fdentalt i v i nf r ton t ned n hi ca i n u ng n or in ont ned n y
atachmens,i c i ilma b s j tt te at n cl tpr i ge, ycon iueisie i or i ,and i i ended onl
t t s onf a , y e ubec o h torey- i i l ma st t n d nf maton
dent en v e t s nt y
f t us o t addr see.I i t e pr t o Ei n , Br
or he e f he es t s h opery f siger own,Le s,Fr el Chait P. Unaut orz us , diclsur or
wi ank & e , A. h ied e s o e
copyng oft s c
i hi omm uniat oran p t her fi s rc l pr i t an may be unlwf . I y hav r eied t s c muniat n
c ion y ar t eo s tit ohbi
y ed d a ul f ou e ec v hi om c i o
i eror pl e no iyus i medit y by r t n e- aiorby e mait r eot n ei naera .c and des r y t s c muniat n
n r , eas tf m a el e ur m l - l o ec i a si lw om,
o to hi om c i
o
and al c es t eof i cl i g aIatachmen s. DebtColecton Di osur Pur tt t e Fai DebtCol ton Pr cesAct
1 opi her , n ud n I t t l i scl e: suan o h r l i adi
ec ,
y ar advs t att s L Fim i a deb col ct a t tng t col ta deb , and an if mat ob ai d may be use f t
ou e ied h hi aw r s t l or temp i o l
e ec t y n or i
on t ne d or hat
pur ose. Advi e Di cl e: ensur c
p Tax c s osur To e ompl n wi r r
i ce t equiemen s i p ed byt I underCic ar230, we if m you
a h t m os he RS r ul n or
t atanywrtenadvie r atngt Feder tx isu c t ne i t scomm u c i , i cldi g i anyatachmen s, n
h it c el i o ala s es onai d n hi niaton n u n n t t was ot
it
n ended norwr en t be us , andcanno b us b an peronf t puroseof 1) oii tx p ale t tmaybe
i o
d ed t e ed, y y s or he p ( av dng a en t s ha
i
i ed un t I enalRev ue Codeor( pr i maretngorr ommendig t an herparyanytans tonl)or
mpos derhe ntr en 2) omotng, k i ec n o ot t r aci s
ma t addr sedbytewrtenadvieconai i t sc
teqs) es h it c t ned n hi ommuniai i l n i anyat
c ton,ncudig n tachment .
P Please consi the envi onm ent bef e pr nt ng thi e- ai.
der r or i i s m l
9. Wi Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS
ndowsLie Hot lPrntMess
vJ
mai i age Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 9 4/12/ 01122:0
1of 43
2 0
D i as
sm
Davi Chai ( hae@eiiger c
d et Dc it sn l om)
aw.
W e 11 30 11 2: PM
d / / 36
Tr anBudu anu( i av nxom)
ai j ve oron @ms c
Pl
ease confr w hetheryou w ilbe appearng f you deposii on M onday.
im l i or ton
Thank you
Davi Chai Esquie
d et r
Ei nger Br
si , own,Lewi Fr s, ankel& Chai ,P.
et A.
Pr dentalCicl * Suie 265-
esi i r e t 5
4000 Hol
lywood Boul d
evar
Holl
ywood,Fl i 33021
orda
p:( 8 3
954) 94-043
f ( 4)894- 5
: 95 801
dchai @ ei ngeraw . *
et si l com
wwwa si l com
ei ngeraw.
Confdental v and Prvacv Notce:Th i or i con ai d i t i c
i ii t i i e nf maton t ne n hs ommuniat n, i udi i or i con ai i any
c i ncl ng nf mat
o on t ned n
at
tachment i conf ent , y b s j tt te at n - l pr i ge,ma con iueisie i or i ,an i i en onl
s,s i i ma e ubec o h torey ci i l
d al ent v e y st t n d nf maton d s nt ded y
t
f t e us oft addr se I i t pr t ofEi n , Br wn,Le s Fr
or h e he es e. t s he opery siger o wi, ankel Ch et P. .Unau horz u dicosur or
& ai , A t ied se, s l e
c yi oft s comm u c i oran pad t er i s rc l pr bi and ma b unlwf . l you ha r ved t scomm unca i
op ng hi niaton y h eof s tit ohi t
y ed y e a ul f ve ecei hi i ton
i e r , la en t yu i me it l b rt r e mal r ye malor c p in iig r w.o a dd sr yt i c mmu iain
n r pe s oi s m daey y eu n - io b - it e e t @esn e l c m, n e to hs o nc t
or f o a o
and aIc es t eof i cl n aIatachmen s.
I opi her , n udig I t t DebtColecton Di osur Pur tt t e Fai Deb Col ct Pr tce Ac ,
l i scl e: suan o h r t l i ac i s t
e on
y ar advs t att s L Fim i a d tcol ct a t tng t c l ta deb , an an i f ma i ob aied may b us f t t
ou e ied h hi aw r s eb l or temp i o ol
e ec t d y n or ton t n e ed or ha
pur se.Tax Advi Di osur To en e c
po ce scl e: sur ompl ce wi r r
i
an t equiement i p ed b t I underCi ar230,we i or you
h s m os y he RS rcul nf m
t anywrten advie r atng t Feder t x isu c t ne i t scommuniat n, i u ng i an atach en s, not
hat it c el i o al a s es on ai d n hi c i ncldi n y t m t was
o
i end norwrt t b us andc
nt ed ien o e ed,
t annotbe u b anyperonf t pupos o ()a di t penalest maybe
sed, y s orhe r e f 1 voi ng ax t hat
i
i os u t It nal
mp ed nder he ner RevenueCode or( pr ig, k tngorr
2) omotn marei ecommendi t anoherparyanytans ont)or
ng o t t r adi s
maters addr s b t wrt ad cec aied i ti communiat n,i udi i an atac
t t) es ed y he ien vi ont n n hs
t c i ncl ng n y t hment
o .
P Pl e c dert envionmentbef e prntng t se- ai.
eas onsi he r or i i hi m l
10. n o Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 10 of 43 1 21: 9
Wid wsLy HomalPitMes g
ie t i rn sa e 1 1 201
4/ 2/ 5
76
Davi Chai ( h e@eii l c
d et Dc ait snger om)
aw.
Thu 1 / /1 11:8 AM
2 01 1 0
Da dCh et( h et sng l c ;Tr anBudu ean ( i av@ms c
vi ai Dc ai @eii eraw.om) ai j v u oron n.om)
1 a/achment
Pl
ease confrm thatyou wilbe at
i l tendi yourdeposi on on M onday.
ng ti
Pl
ease see at ached.
t
Thank You
Davi
d
11. Wi Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS
è
ndowsLi Hot aiPrntMess
ye m l i age Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 114/12/ 121: 9
1 of 43
201 5
.
(No Subj )
ect
Davi Chai ( ait iigera c
d et Dch e@esn lw.om)
Thu 1 / /11 156 PM
2 01 :
Tr an Buduv u( i v@ms c
ai j ean orona n.om)
l you w oul lke t st tyourdepo eari i t day,pl
f d i o ar ler n he ease l m e know .
et
1c n s ar any i e a t 1 0 pm .
a t t t m f er 03
Davi Chai Esqui e
d et r
Ei nger Br n,Lewi Fr el& Chai ,P.
si , ow s, ank et A.
Pr dentalCicl . Suie 265-
esi i r e t 5
4000 Hol wood Boul d
l
y evar
Holl
ywood,Fl i 33021
orda
p:( 4)894 30
95 - 43
f ( 4)8 801
: 95 94- 5
dchai @ eii l . *
et sngeraw com
www . si l .
ei ngeraw com
Confdental v and Prvacv Notce:The if ma in con ai i t scomm u ca i , icl n if maton c aied i any
i ii t i i n or to t ned n hi ni ton n udig n or i ont n n
atac t i coni talmaybesubectt t ator - in prvl mayc tt e i i if mai andi it
t hmens,s fdeni , j o he t neycl t ii
e ege, onsi nsde n or ton, s nendedonl
ut y
f t u oft e addr s I i t pr
or he se h es ee.t s he opedy ofEii ,Br , L s Fr el& Chai , A.Unau hor ed use, scos e or
snger own ewi, ank et P. t iz di l ur
c ng oft s c muniat n orany par t eofi stity pr bt d and may be unlwf . I y h r eied t s c muniat n
opyi hi om c i
o t her s rc l ohiie a ul f ou ave ec v hi om c i
o
i eror plasenotyusi
n r,e i mmedi el b r ur e maiorb e- lo r ton@eiiger c anddesr t scommuniat n
f at y y et n - l y mait ecepi sn l om,
aw. toy hi ci o
and alcopi t eo ,i l ng aI a t
I es her f ncudi l tachment DebtCol i Di osur Pur uan t t Fai Deb Col ton Pr cesAd ,
s. l on scl e: s t o he r t l i adi
ect ec
y ar advse t t s L Fim i a debtc lc oratemptn t c l ta debt and an i or i obt ned m a be us f t at
ou e i d hat hi aw r s ol t t ig o ol
e ec j y nf maton ai y ed or h
pur e.Tax Advi Di osur To ens e compl ce wi r r
pos ce scl e: ur i
an t equiemen s i
h t mpos b t I underCi ar230, we i or y
ed y he RS rcul nf m ou
t atan wr t a c r atng t Feder t isu con ai d i t s communiat n,i udi i an atac
h y ien dvie el i o
t al ax s es t ne n hi c i ncl ng n y t hmen s was not
o t,
it ded nor it t be u an c
n en wrten o sed, d annotbeus byan p s f t pur eof( )avoiigt p ale t tma b
ed, y eron or he pos 1 dn ax en t s ha y e
i
i
mpose und te I er Rev
d er h nt nal enueCodeor( pr tng,maretn orr ommen n t anot p t an tansacins)or
2) omoi k ig ec dig o her ary y r t l
o
mateqs addr s b t wrt adviecont nedi t sc
t ) es ed y he ien c
t ai n hi ommuniai icl ngi anyat
c ton,n udi n tachmen .
t
P Pl e consi t envionm ent bef e pr nt ng t s e- ai.
eas der he r or i i hi m l
12. W i Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 124/12/ 01121:
1 of 43
ndowsLie Hot lPrntMess
y mai i age
2 58
F#?:
Davi Chai ( ait sigera c
d et Dch e@ein lw.om)
Thu 1 / / 6: PM
2 01 11 55
Tr an Buduv
ai j eanu( i v@ms c
orona n.om)
Fr :Davi Chai
om d et
Sent:Thur
sday,Decem ber01,2011 1: PM
56
To:' ai Buduv nu'
Tr an j ea
Subj :
e
l you woul Ike to s tyourdepo earleri the day, pl
f di tar i n ease I m e know .
et
Ican s ar anyti e aft 1030 pm .
t t m er
Davi Chai Esquie
d et r
Ei nger Br
si , own,Lewi Frs, ankel& Chai ,P.A.
et
Pr dentalCicl . Suie 265-
esi i r e t 5
4000 Holl
ywood Boul d
evar
Hollywood,Fl i 33021
orda
p:( 4)89 3043
95 4-
f( 4 8 8 5
: 95 ) 94-01
dchai ei nneraw.om *
etl si l c
www. si l .
ei ngeraw com
Confdental v and Prvac Notce:The i or i c aied i t i c muniat n, i l ng i or a i con ai d i any
i ii t i v i nf maton ont n n hs om c i ncudi nf m ton t ne n
o
at hment,i c i ilmaybe s j tt t ator - i tpii ge,mayc si ei i if mai , and i it
tac s s onf a,
dent ubec o he t neycl rvl
en e on tt nsde nor ton
ut s n ended onl
y
f t u oft e a ess . Ii te pr eryo Ei n , o Le s,Fr el Ch et P. Unau horz u di l ur or
or he se h ddr ee ts h op t f sigerBrwn, wi ank & ai , A. t ied se, scos e
c i o t scomm unia i oran p t er i s r t pr bi and m a b u awf . I y h r eied t s c muniat
opyng f hi c ton y ad h eof s ti l ohi t
cy ed y e nl ul f ou ave ec v hi om c i
on
i eror plasenotyusi
n r,e i mmedi el byr ur e- l bye- lo rcepi eii lw com 1an desr t i c muniat
f at y et n maior mait e ton@ snger a d toy hs om
. c ion
a aIc est eofi u ng alatac
nd I opi her ,ncldi l t hment. DebtCol i Di cl e:Pur uant o t Fai Deb Col t n Pr di s Ac
s l on s osur
ect s t he r t l i a ce tec o ,
you ar advied t att s L Fim i a d col c oratemptng t c l ta debt and any i or i n ob ai may be us f t t
e s h hi aw r s ebt l t t i o ol e ec , nf mato t ned ed or ha
pur e. Advi Di osur To en e c pl nc wih r r en s i pos byt l und Cicuar230, we if m you
pos Tax ce scl e: sur om i e t equi
a em t m ed he RS er r l n or
t tan wrt advie r atn t Feder t x is c ai i t scomm u c i , i u ng i an a t
ha y i ent c el ig o al a s ues ont ned n hi niaton ncldi n y tachmen s, was n
t ot
13. WidoCase 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 134/12/ 01121:
*
n wsLy Ho mal rn Me s g
ie t iP it s a e 1 of 43
2 58
zj
it
n ended norwrten t be used, c tbe us , byan p s f t pur eof 1 av dngt pen t t tma be
it o and anno ed y eron or he pos ( ) oii ax ali ha y
es
i ed un t I er Rev
mpos der he nt nal enueCod or( pomoi maretn orr ommen ngt anoterp t an tan ont or
e 2) r tng, k ig ec di o h ary y r sadi s)
maters a ess b t wrt ad c c ai i t sc
t t) ddr ed y he ien vie ont ned n hi ommuniai i l ngi an atac
t c ton,ncudi n y t hment.
P Pl
ease c i t envionmentbef e prntng t se- l
onsder he r or i i hi mai.
14. WidoCase 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 144/ 2/ 112158
n wsLy Ho mal rn Me s ge
ie t iP it s a l of 43
1 20 :
( Subj )
No ect
Davi Chai ( hae@eii era c
d et Dc it sng lw.om)
F i1 / / 2:9 PM
r 2 02 11 2
Tr an Budu anu( i av n.om)
ai j ve oron @ms c
1 atachm ent
t
Si
r
Iha notr cei c fr a i bac f om y r di y a t
ve e ved on i m t on k r ou egar ng our t enda e a t deposton.
nc t he ii
Ac or ngl ,Ias um e t I il ee you a t dat , t m e and pl e oft deposton notc a t ched.
c di y s hat w l s t he e i ac he ii ie t a
Have a good w eekend.
lt us that Iw ilsee you M onday.
r t l
Davi Chai Esquie
d et r
Ei nger Br
si , own,Lewi Fr s, ankel& Chai ,P, .
et A
Pr dentalCicl . Suie 265-
esi i r e t 5
4000 Holywood Boul d
l evar
Holl
ywood,Fl i 33021
orda
p:( 4)894-043
95 3
f ( 4 89 801
: 95 ) 4- 5
dchai @ ei nneraw.om *
et si l c
www . si l .
ei ngeraw com
Confdental v and Prvacv Notce: i or a i con ai i t scomm u c i , i cldi if mat con ai i any
i ii t i i The nf m ton t ned n hi niaton n u ng n or ion t ned n
atac t i c i talmayb s j tt te atorey-l pr i maycon iuei i i or in, and i i ended onl
t hmens,s onfdeni , e ubec o h t n ci i l
ent v ege, st t nsde nf mat
t o s nt y
f t us oft e addr s I i t pr
or he e h es ee.t s he opedy o Eii er Br
f s ng , own, s,Fr el Chait P. . Unau h ied u dicosur or
Lewi ank & e, A t orz se, s l e
c n oft s c
opyig hi ommuniaton orany par t eo i stity pr i t an may be unlwf l l you hav r ceied t s communiaton
c i t her f s rc l ohbied d a u. f e e v hi c i
i eror pl e n i usi
n r , eas oty mmedi el b r ur e- l bye- lor ept n@ ei n lw. , and des r y t s c u c i
f at y y et n maior mait ec io sigera com to hi omm niaton
and aIcopi t eo ,i l ng aI a t
I es her f ncudi I tachmen s.DebtCol i Di osur Pur tt t e Fai Deb Col ct Pr tc Ac ,
t l on scl e: suan o h
ect r t l i e on ac ies t
you ar ad s t t i La Fim i a deb col t a t tng t col c a d t an an i or ton obt n ma b us f t
e vied hat hs w r s t l or temp i o l t eb , d y nf ma i
ec e aied y e ed or hat
pur se.Tax Advi e Di osur To ens e c i e wi r quiemen si p
po c scl e: ur ompl anc t e r
h t m osed b t l underCi ar230, we i or y
y he RS rcul nf m ou
t atanywrten advie r atn t Feder t isue con aied i t i c muniat n, i l ng i an atac
h it c el ig o al ax s s t n n hs om c i ncudi n y t hmens,
o t was not
it
n ended norwr t t b us and c notbe use ,byanyp s f t puroseof 1) oi ngtx p t tat
ien o e ed,
t an d eron or he p ( av di a enales h maybe
i
15. Wido Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 15 of 43 121 5
n wsLy Ho mal rn Me s ge
ie t iP it s a 1 1 201 : 8
4/ 2/
i osedunderte I er Revenu Codeor( pr ig, kei orr
mp h nt nal e 2) omot mar tng ecommendi t anoherparyanytansa onl)or
n ng o t t r di s
maters addr ed b t wrt ad c c ai i t sc
t t) ess y he ien vie ont ned n hi ommuniat n,ncudi i an atac
t c i i l ng n y t hmen.
o t
P Please consi the envionm ent bef e pri ng thi e- ai.
der r or nti s m l
16. W i Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS
ndowsLie Hot lPrntMes
y mai i sage Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 16 of/43121:6
1 1 201
4/ 2 5
R E:
Tr an Buj
ai duveanu ( i a
or v@ms c
on n.om)
Su 1 / 4/ 1 1 2 PM
n 2 0 1 0:4
DavdCh et( hait sng lw.om)
i ai dc e@eii era c
DearM r.Chai ,
et
Thank you agai f yourem ai.
n or l
Pl
ease be ki and under and that Iw i t be ashel ulas possi e.
nd st sh o pf bl
How e Ic
ver annota t yourdeposton s t by y , due to the i
t end ii e ou nconveni
ence ofbei ver sck.
ng y i
W e ne t r chedul t deposton durng a tm e t tI i be i good hea t and lha a c earm i ,
ed o es e he ii i i ha w l n
l lh ve l nd
as s es can cause m y m i t go com pl y bl oreven t m i em em berthi w hi coul dam age
tr s nd o etel ank, o sr ngs ch d
yourcause.
Onc a n,Ibel t I ct ng her wi bet s hedul t deposton a t t Cour wil weraI
e gai i he ogi hi
eve e l o c
l e he ii fer he t lans I
pendi m oti ,and al af erm y sur y.
ng ons so t ger
Bes Regar
t ds
Tr i Bu du anu
aan j ve
F om:Dc e @eii er c
r hait sng l om
aw.
To:oron v@ ms c
ia n.om
Sub e
j d:
Dat Fr,2 Dec 2011 19: 41 +0000
e: i 29:
Si
r
I ve notr ei confr a i ba f om you r di yourat endan a t depos ton.
ha ec ved im ton ck r egar ng t ce t he ii
Accor ngl Ias e that Iw ilsee you atthe date, tm e and pl e oft deposton notc a t hed.
di y, sum l i ac he ii i e t ac
Have a good w eekend.
Itr tthatjw ils you M onday.
us l ee
Davi Chai Esquie
d et r
17. Wi Case t l rn Mes age
ndowsLieHo1:11-cv-20120-PAS
y mai P it s Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 17 of/201121:6
1 1 43
4/ 2 5
Ei nger Br
si , own,Lew i Fr el& Chai ,P.
s, ank et A.
Pr dentilCicl .Suie 265-
esi a r e t 5
4000 Hol
lywood Boul d
evar
Holl
ywood,Fl i 33021
orda
p:( 4)894- 043
95 3
f ( 4)89 801
: 95 4- 5
dc ai a eiiaeraw.om *
h et sn l c
www . si l .
ei ngeraw com
Confdental v and Prvacv Notce:The if maton c ai ed i t s c
i ii t i i n or i ont n n hi omm unia i , icldig if mat n con ai i any
c ton n u n n or i o t ned n
at
tachment i c i ilmaybe s j tt t ator - intprvl mayconsi t isie i or i , and i i ended onl
s,s onf a,
dent ubec o he t neycl
e ii ege, tue n d nf maton
t s nt y
f t use oft e a ess . I i t e pr edy ofEi n ,Br wn, L s Fr el Chait P. Un h ie us , diclsur or
or he h ddr ee t s h op siger o ewi, ank & e , A. aut orz d e s o e
copyngoft scomm u cai oranypar t eofi sr typr biedan maybeunlwf . I you hav r v t s communi ton
i hi ni ton ther s ti l ohi t
c d a ul f e eceied hi ca i
i eror plasenoiyu i
n r,e tf s mmedit ybyr ur e- l bye- lo rcepi eii er c , and destoyt s comm uniaton
ael et n maior mait e ton@ sng l om aw. r hi c i
and aI c es t eof i l ng aI a t chment DebtCol i Di osur Pur tt t e Fai Deb Col c i Pr c Ac ,
I opi her , ncudi I ta s. l on scl e: suan o h
ect r t l ton adies t
e
you ar adv s t tt s L Fim i a de col oratem p ig t c l ta deb , and any if mat o ai d may be us f t t
e i ed ha hi aw r s bt l ect t tn o ol ec t n or i bt ne
on ed or ha
pur e,Tax Advi e Di osur To ensur c pi e wih r ui
pos c scl e: e om lanc t eq r ement i p
s m osed byt I underCi ar230, we i or y
he RS r
cul nf m ou
t atany wrten advie r atn t Feder t i ues c ai i t scomm u c i , i u ngi an atach ens, snot
h it c el ig o alax ss ont ned n hi niaton ncldi n y t m t wa
i ended n wrten t be used andcanno beused, an peronf t pur eof 1 av dngtx p ale t t y b
nt or it o , t by y s orhe pos ( ) oii a en t s ha ma e i
i ed un t lt nalRe
mpos derhe ner venueCo or( pr ig, kei orr ommendigt an h p t an tan t nt or
de 2) omotn mar tng ec n o oter ary y r saci s)
o
maters addess b te wrtenadvieconai i t scommu c i i u ngi an atac t
t t) r ed y h it c t ned n hi niaton,ncldi n y t hmen .
P Please c i t envionm ent bef e prnt ng t s e- ai.
ons der he r or i i hi m l
18. Wid wsLv Ho1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 18 1 /43 215
n o Case t iP itMe s ge
ir mal rn s a 1 of 2 1 :7
4/ 2 01
e* *
Davi Chai ( h et sn lw.om)
d et Dc ai @eiigera c
Mon 1 / / 8: AM
2 05 11 20
Tr anBudu eanu( i v@ms c
ai j v orona n.om)
Icannotagr
ee,
On DK 4,2011 a 1 25 P Tr an Buj ve <oron l ms c
, t 0: M, ai du anu i av n.oml wr e:
ot
DearM r.Chai
et,
Thank you agai f yourem ai.
n or l
Pl
ease be ki and under tand t Iw i to be as hel ulas possi e.
nd s hat sh pf bl
How e l anno a t y deposton s tby y due t t i onveni e ofbei ver
ver c t t end our ii e ou, o he nc enc ng y
si
ck.
W e need t r chedul t deposton durn atm et tI l be i good healh a Iha
o es e he ii ig i ha wi l n t nd ve
a cl m i ass r scan caus m y m i t g c pl el bl , ore t m i em em ber
ear nd, t es e nd o o om et y ank ven o sr
thi w hi coul dam age yourcause.
ngs ch d
Onc agai I i e t I ct ng her wi bet s hedul t deposton afert Cour
e n, belev he ogi hi e l o c
l e he ii t he t
w il w eraI pendi m otons and alo a t m y s ger .
l ans I ng i , s f er ur y
Bes Regar
t ds
Tr an Bu du anu
ai j ve
Fr :Dchait ei nqeraw.
om e @ si l com
To:oronav@ msn.om
i c
Subed:
j
Dat Fr,2 Dec 2011 19: 41 +0000
e: i 29:
Si
r
I e notr ei ed c im a i ba f om you r di g yourat enda att
hav ec v onfr ton ck r egar n t nce he
deposi on.
ti
Accor ngl lassum e that Iw ils you atthe dat tm e and pl oft deposi on notce
di y, l ee e, i ace he ti i
at ached.
t
Have a good w eekend.
19. Wido Case t iP itMe s g
n wsLy Ho1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 19 1 /43 2157
ie mal rn s a e 1 of 2
4/ 2 011 2
It us t Iwilsee you M onday.
r t hat l
Davi Chai Esquie
d et r
Ei nger Br
si , own,Lew i,Fr el& Chai ,P.
s ank et A.
Pr dentalCicl * Suie 265-
esi i r e t 5
4000 Hol
lywood Boul d
evar
Holl
ywood,Fl i 33021
orda
p:( 4)894-
95 3043
f ( 4)89 801
: 95 4- 5
dchai l ei ngeraw . '
et si l com
www. si l .
ei ngeraw com
* la e n e t ato rf n? meha c an d.
pe s ot h u / na r s h ge
Confdental v and Prvac Notce:Th i or i c ai i t s c
i ii t i v i e nf maton ont ned n hi omm u ca i ,i u ng if mat
ni ton ncldi n or i on
c ai i an atachment i con i tal maybesu ec t te at neycl nt ii
ont ned n y t s, s fden i , bj t o h tor - i prvl mayc tut i i
e ege, onsi e nsde
t
if mat n, i i en onl f t e us oft addr ee. l i t pr
n or i and s nt ded y or h e he
o ess t s he opedy ofEii ,Br wn,L wi Fr el
s nger o e s, ank
& Chai ,P. .Unaut ied u diclsur orc n of hi c munca i orany par t eofi s rc l
et A horz se, s o e opyig t s om i ton t her s tit y
p ohi t an may be unl ul I y ha r eied t s c munia i i eror pl se not y u i medit y b
r bi ed d awf . f ou ve ec v hi om c ton n r , ea i sm
f a el y
rt r e mal b e malor c t n esn e lw.o a dd sryt i c mmu ia ina daI o iste e f
e u n - ior y - it e epi @ iig r c m, n e to hs o nc t n Ic pe h r o ,
o a o
i u n aIa tchment .DebtColec i Di cl e:Pur uantt t Fai DebtCol ct Pr tc Ac , y a e
ncldi g I ta s l ton s osur s o he r l i ac ies t ou r
e on
advied t att s L Fim i a debtco lc oratemptn t c l a debt and any if mat obt n may be
s h hi aw r s l t t ig o ol
e ed , n or ion aied
u ed f t pur os Tax Advi Di osur To ens e c pl n e wih r r
s or hat p e. ce scl e: ur om i c t equi
a ement i ed byt I un
s mpos he RS der
Ci ar230, i f m you t anywrten advce r a i t Feder t isuescon ai i t scommuniat n,
r
cul we nor hat it i eltng o alax s t ned n hi c i
o
i l ng i an atac
ncudi n y t hmen s, no i t ded n wrten t b us , an c tb us b any per on f t
t was t n en or i o e ed d anno e ed, y
t s or he
pur eof( )avoiigt penalest maybei ed un t It nal enueCode or( pr i
pos 1 d n ax t hat
i mpos der he ner Rev 2) omotng,
maretn orr ommendi t anoherpadyanytans tonl)ormaters)addr s b tewrtenadvie
k ig ec ng o t r aci s tt es ed y h it c
c aied i t sc
ont n n hi ommuniaton,icldig i anyat
c i nu n n tachmen.
t
P Pl
ease consi the envionm ent bef e pri i thi e-m ai,
der r or nt ng s l
20. Wi Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS
ndowsLv Ho maiP itMess
ie t l rn age Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 20 of 43 21:6
1 2/ 011 5
4/1 2
M oti f Sum m ar Judgm ent
on or y
Tr anBuj
ai duveanu ( i a
oron v@ms c
n.om)
Tu 11 2 113: PM
e / 9/ 20
Davd Chaet(ch e@eiiger c
i i d ait sn l om) aw.
Re:Moton f Sum mar Judgment,
i or y
DearMr Chai ,
. et
1 b i e t s i wh you wan e me t do fom t e i e i n oft s c s .
elev hi s at td o r h nc pt o hi a e
The ot way ar
her ound,ofcour you woul have had t r
se, d o evealmany unpl antcrm i ad s c
eas i nal omm it by
ted
t def
he endant ,and t coul have I i o a crm i i tgaton by t DeparmentofJus i .
s hat d ead nt i nal nves i i he t tce
Agai 1do no bame y f p o t ig t e De en t b c e t i i yourj a you a e as pad a îtof
n, tl ou or r tvfn h f dans e aus hs s ob nd r lo i o
money by t ri ance c pany.
hei nsur om
W ih my l ied fnanci r our Icoul nothave a f rfght butIf i notf raIt tme.
t i t i al es ces,
m d ai i , ie s ai I he i
Jus make sur t t Justc Depar mentdo notcome aRert , because t have r l gotaway a f
t e hat he ie t hem hey ealy ew
tmesw ih crmi ads.
i t i nal
Bes Regar
t ds
Tr an Buduv anu
ai j e
21. W i Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS
ndowsLi Hot lPrntMes
ye mai i sage Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 21/of 201122:
14 1 43
2/ 03
R E:N oti of M oti for Sum m aG Judgm ent
ce on
Davi Chai ( hait sn lw.om)
d et Dc e@eiigera c
Mon 11 21 149 PM
/ /11 :
Tr an Bu du eanu ( i v@ms c
ai j v orona nxom)
Iam nother t educate you on the r es. How ever you ar notentr y cor ec
e o ul , e iel r t.
The Cour does nothave yourm oti on is books.
t on t
You cannot sm pl setone,especi l w ihoutcoor nati i w ih ourof i
i y aly t di ng t t fce.
I y ar welenought dr t fl and s ta motonf s
f ou e l o af, ie e i or umm ar j
y udgm en , henyoushoul be abl t
tt d eo
at end a deposton.
t ii
M y ofi w ilbe r set ng yourdeposi on.
fce l e- ti ti
Davi
d
Fr :Tr an Budu ea ( lo: i av ms c
om ai j v nu mai oron @ n.om)
t
Sent:Monday,Novem ber21,2011 1: PM
45
To:Davi Chai
d et
Sub e :RE:Notc ofMoi f Su
j ie ton or mmar J dgment
yu
DearMr Chai ,
. et
Thi i a Notce ofl entt fl a Moti n f Sum mar Judgment
ss i nt o i e o or y .
As Iunder and,a notce m ustbe gi t al opposi pari , days i advance.
st i ven o I ng tes zl n
BestRegar
ds,
Tr an Bu du anu
ai j ve
22. Wido Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 22 /12/ 122:
n wsLy Hot iP itMe s ge
ie mal rn s a 1 of 43
4 201 02
(No Subject)
Davi Chai ( hait sn lw.om)
d et Dc e @eiigera c
Tu 1 / 9 11 2: PM
e 1 2 / 05
Tr an Budu ean ( i av ms c
ai j v u oron @ n.om)
Si,
r
Asyouar welenought fl motons pr edecl a i andat
e l oi e i , epar artons temptt ar ahe i (as ume
o gue arng 1 s
your dc tsor srkngyournotc ofhearng)I ls youMondayf yourdeposton.
ea our' der tii ie i , wil ee or ii
Davi Chai Esquie
d et r
Eii ,Br n,Lewi Fr
snger ow s, ankel& Chai ,P.
et A.
Pr dentalCicl * Suie 265-
esi i r e t 5
4000 Hol
lywood Boul d
evar
Holl
ywood,Fl ia 33021
ord
p:(54)89 30
9 4- 43
f ( 4)8 801
: 95 94- 5
dchai @ eii l com *
et snqeraw.
www. si l c
ei ngeraw.om
Confden i iv and Prvacv Notce:The if maton c a n i t s c muniat n, i l ng i or ton con ai i any
i talt i i n or i ont i ed n hi om c i ncudi nf ma i
o t ned n
at
tachment i c i ilma b s j tt te at n cl tpr i g maycon iuei de if mat n, i i endedonl
s,s onf a , y e ubec o h torey- i i l e,
dent en v e st t nsi nor i and s nt
t o y
f t e us oft addr s . l i t p opery ofEii ,Br wn,L s Fr el Ch et P.A.Unau hor ed u dicosu e or
or h e he es ee t s he r t snger o ewi, ank & ai , t i z se, s l r
c yi oft i communi ton orany par t er i s r t pr bi and may b unlwf . I y ha r ved t s communiaton
op ng hs ca i t h eof s ti l ohi t
cy ed e a ul f ou ve ecei hi c i
i er , eas noi usi
n ror pî e tf mmedkt ybyrt ne- iorbye- lor ept eii lw. anddesryt sc
y ael eur mal mait ec ion@ sngera com, to hi ommunc i
iaton
and aI c es t eof i cldig aIatach en s.
I opi her , n u n I t m t DebtColec i Di osur Pu suan t t Fai Deb Col ct Pr ce Ac ,
l ton scl e: r t o he r t l i adi s t
e on
y ar advs t att s L Fim i a deb col ct atem p i t c l ta d t an an i or ton obt n may be us f t t
ou e ied h hi aw r s t l or t tng o ol
e ec eb , d y nf ma i aied ed or ha
pur os Tax Advi e Di osur To ens e compl ce wi r r
p e. c scl e: ur i
an t equiemen s i
h t mpos b t e l underCi ar230, we i or you
ed y h RS rcul nf m
t tany wr t ad c r atng t Feder t isue con ai i t i co muniaton, i l di i an atac
ha ien vie el i o
t al ax s s t ned n hs m c i nc u ng n y t hmen s,
t was n ot
i en norwrten t be u
nt ded i o
t sed,an c notbe used, byanyper f t p pos of()a digt penalest maybe
d an son or he ur e 1 voi n ax t hat
i
i osedunderte I er lRevenu Codeor( pr i maretngorr ommendigt an herpadyanytans tont)or
mp h nt na e 2) omotng, k i ec n o ot r aci s
maters addr s byt wrt advc c aied i t sc
t t) es ed he ien ie ont n n hi ommuniat n,ncudi i anyatac
t c i i l ng n
o t hment.
P Please consi the envionm ent bef e pri ng t s e- ai.
der r or nti hi m l
23. Wi o Case ot i PitMe s ge
nd wsLy H1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 234/ 243 2 :
ie mal rn s a 1 of / 011 202
1 2
R E:
Tr an Bu duveanu ( i v@ms c
ai j orona n.om)
Tu 11 2 /112: 3 PM
e /9 1
DavdChae ( h et sng lw.om)
i it dc ai @eii era c
DearM r Chai ,
. et
Thank you f youremai.
or l
I ver m uch appear t me asyou ar t one qualfed t m ak medi as wel ascour decii i t s
t y so e he ii o e cal l t sons n hi
Case.
As you have c egorcaly r us t pari pat i t dicover pr s and mor t t you have t aly
at i l ef ed o tci e n he s y oces e han hat ot l
i ed t t r r
gnor he hid equestf dicover lsugges t you wai fr f a couo answerand deci on on aI
or s y, t hat t ist or si I
pendi moti ns.
ng o
Bes Regar
t ds
Tr an Budu ean
ai j v u
Fr Dch e @eii eraw.om
om: ait sng l c
To:or v@ ms c
i
ona n.om
Subed:
j
Dat Tue,29 Nov 2011 19: 29 +0000
e: 05:
Si,
r
Asyouar welenought fl motons pr edecaatonsandat
e l oi e i , epar lr i temptt ar ahearn ( a s
o gue ig 1 s ume
y r c tsor srki y notc ofhearng) I ls y Monda f y dep ii
ou ead our' der ti ng our ie i , wi ee ou
l y or our oston.
Davi Chai Esquie
d et r
Ei nger Br
si , own,Lewi Fr s, ankel& Chai ,P.
et A.
Pr dentalCicl . Suie 265-
esi i r e t 5
4000 Hol wood Boul d
l
y evar
Holl
ywood,Fl ia 33021
ord
p:( 4)89 30
95 4- 43
f ( 4)8 801
: 95 94- 5
dchai l ei nqeraw . '
et si l com
www. si l ,
ei ngeraw com
Confdentalt and Prvac Notce:The if mai conai i t sc
i i iv i v i nor ton t ned n hi ommuniat n,i udi i or ai conai d i any
c i ncl ng nf m ton t ne n
o
atach t i coni talmaybe s j tt t ator -l ntpr i e,maycon ttt isie if maton, i i en onl
t mens,s fdeni , ubec o he t neyci i l
e v eg siue n d nor i and s nt ded y
f t e us oft addr se I i t pr t ofEii ,Br
or h e he es e. t s he opery snger own,L s,Fr el Chait P. Unaut orz u diclsur or
ewi ank & e , A. h ied se, s o e
cop ng oft s comm unca i oran par t eofi s r t pr bt d an may be unlwf .I y hav r eied t s c
yi hi i ton y t her s ti l ohiie d
cy a ul f ou e ec v hi omm unia i
c ton
24. Wi d wsLy Ho1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 24 of/201122:2
n o Case t i PitMes a
ie mal rn s ge 1 1 43
4/ 2 0
i eror plasenotyusi
n r,e i mmedi el b r u ne- l bye- lo r epi eii er w.om, d desr t scommu c i
f at y y etr maior mait ec ton@ sng l c an toy hi
a niaton
an a1c i t er ,icl ng a1atachmen s.DebtCol i Di osur Pur uan t t Fai DebtCol ton Pr ces Ac ,
d I opes h eof n udi I t t l on scl e: s t o he r
ect l i
ec adi t
you ar advied t tt s La Fim i a deb c l t atemptn t col ta debt and any i or i obt ned m a be us f t at
e s ha hi w r s t ol or t ig o l
ec ec , nf maton ai y ed or h
p pos Tax Advi Di osur To ensur c
ur e. ce scl e: e ompl e wih r r
i
anc t equi emen s i
t mpos by t e l underCiculr23 we i or y
ed h RS r a 0, nf m ou
t tan wr t advce r atn t Feder t i ues c ai i t s c
ha y i en i el i g o
t alax ss ont ned n hi omm unia i i l ng i any atac
c ton, ncudi n t hment ,was not
s
i en norwrt t b us andcann be u b anyperonf te puroseof( av di tx p alist tma b
nt ded ien o e ed,
t ot sed, y s or h p 1) oi ng a en te ha y e
i edundert It nalRe
mpos he ner venueCo or( pomoi maretn orr ommen ngt anoterp t an tans tons)or
de 2) r tng, k ig ec di o h ary y r aci t
mat addr sedbytewrtenadvieconai i t sc
teqs) es h it c t ned n hi ommuniai i l ngi anyatac
c ton,ncudi n t hment.
P Please consi t envi onm ent bef e pr nt ng t s e- ai.
der he r or i i hi m l
25. Wi Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 254/1 43 122:
ndowsLi Hot aiPrntMess
ye m l i age
1 of 2
2/ 01 01
R E:R E:
Davi Chai ( hait snger c
d et Dc e@eii l om)
awa
Tue 11 29 112:6 P
/ / 2 M
Tr anBuduv anu( i av n.om)
ai j e oron @ms c
It ustIw ils you M onday.
r l ee
W e have resetdeposii f you t i .
ton or w ce
Fr :Tr an Buduv nu ( lo: i av ms c
om ai j ea mai oron @ n.omj
t
Sent:Tuesday,Novem ber29,2011 2: PM
14
To:Davi Chai
d et
Sub ec :RE:
j t
DearMr Chai ,
. et
Thankyou f yourem ai.
or l
I ver m uch appear t me asyou ar t one qualfed t mak m edi as wel as cour decii i t s
t y so e he ii o e cal l t sons n hi
Case,
Asyou have cat ial r us t par i pat i t dicover pr
egorc l ef ed o tci e n he s
y y ocessand m or t t you have t aly
e han hat ot l
i ed t t r r
gnor he hid eques f di
t or scover Isuggestt you wai fr tf a c tans and deci on on aI
y, hat t is or our wer si 1
pendi motons.
ng i
Bes Regar
t ds
Tr an Buduv u
ai j ean
Fr :Dchai @ ei ngeraw.
om et si l com
To:oronav@ msn.
i com
26. Wido Case t i P itMe s g
i 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 26 of 43 12 01
n wsLyeHo ma l rn s a e 1 1 201 2:
4/ 2/
Subed:
j
Dat Tue,29 Nov 2011 19: 29 +0000
e: 05:
Si,
r
Asyou a ewelen gh t fl mo i ,pr par de l aton an atemp t ar e a he ig ( a s y
r l ou o i tons e e car i s d t t o gu
e arn 1 s ume ou
radc tsor srkn yourn ieofh ig) Iwi sey Mon f y d ston.
e our' der tiig otc earn , l e ou day or our epo ii
l
Davi Chai Esqui e
d et r
Ei nger Br
si , own,L s,Fr
ewi ankel& Chai ,P.
et A.
Pr dentalCicl * Suie 265-
esi i r e t 5
4000 Hol wood Boul d
l
y evar
Holl
ywood,Fl i 33021
orda
p:( )89 30
954 4- 43
f ( 4)894- 5
: 95 801
dchai a ei ngerawa *
et si l com
www. si l .om
ei nqeraw c
Confdentalt and Prvacv Notc Th if maton c aied i t s c munia in, i l ng i or a i c t n i any
i i iv i i e: e n or i ont n n hi om c to ncudi nf m ton on aied n
a t hment i c i talmaybesube t t ator - in prvlge,mayc tt ei i if mai andi it
tac s,s onfdeni , jcto he t neycl t ii
e e onsi nsde nor ton, s nendedonl
ut y
f t u oft e addr s . Ii t pr
or he se h es ee ts he opedyofEii ,Br
snger own,L s,Fr el& Chai ,P. Unauhor edus di l ur or
ewi ank et A. t iz e, scos e
c yi oft s communi ton oran par t er i s rc l pr bi and may b unlwf . I y ha r ved t s c
op ng hi ca i y t h eof s tit ohi t
y ed e a ul f ou ve ecei hi ommuniatonc i
i eror pl e n i usi edit yb r ur e- lorb e- lor ent eii lw.com,and des r y t s c
n r , eas otf mm ael y et n mai y mait ec i
y ona snnera to hi omm unca i
i ton
and aIcopis t e ,i l ng aI a t chment , DebtCol i Di osur Pur tan t t Fai DebtCol ton Pr ces Ac ,
I e her of ncudi I ta s l on scl e: s l t o he r
ect l i
ec adi t
you ar ad s t t i L Fim i a de col t atem p i t c l ta d , a a i o ma i obt i ed ma be us f t t
e vied hat hs aw r s bt l or t tng o ol
ec ec ebt nd ny nf r ton a n y ed or ha
pur ose. Advi e Di osur To ens e c
p Tax c scl e: ur ompl ce wi r r
ian t equiemen s i ed b t l underCi ar230, we i f m you
h t mpos y he RS rcul n or
t tan wrten advce r atn t Feder t i ues c aied i t s c munia i , i l ng i any atac
ha y i t i el ig o alax ss ont n n hi om c ton ncudi n t hmens,was not
t
i t ed norwr t t b us and canno be us , byan peronf te puroseof 1) oi ngtxpenalestat y b
n end i en o e ed,
t t ed y s or h p ( av di a t h ma e
i
i ed und t I er alRev
mpos erhe nt n enue Codeor( pr tng,maretn orr ommendigt an h p t an tans tonl)or
2) omoi k ig ec n o oter ary y r aci s
mat t)addr sedbytewrtenadvieconai i t sc
ters es h it c t ned n hi ommuniai icl n i anyat
c ton,n udig n tachment
.
P Please consi the envionm ent bef e prnti thi e- ai.
der r or i ng s m l
27. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 27 of 43
N o Sol ase Uni m iy
va dhe t rn ve t
Cole ofO so pat eM e e e
lge t hi di l
3200 S U ni iy D ri
ven t ve
('oL audeM alaFl333:8
it e
( ) 4
954262-371
PatentN sm e:
i Bu d v a u Tr in
j u e n , aa
D. B.
O. : 12- 54
11-
Enc mtr#:
ot e 1 31
7 4
M R#: 1626
Ph i i .
yscmr HitDO,Gar
l y
Da e ofSer c
t vi e: 6-21-11
Exxm i i
naton; LEFT NVGU DVA L U LTR ASO U ND
I c ton:
ndiai Pin
M ul e c s we e ob a ne n e e t i don r vea sa l gem ' offui c l c i n t i
dpl ut r t i d. xzm na e l ar O l d ole to h+ s
orgi
i nadng &om G e abdom en ext ndi dow m vr d t t s ot . Tle Gndi s y l be
e ng o he cr um l ng h u d
c i ca l co r a e w ih a iese a ng do
lni ly r el t d t t xl nai xmw ar i o a l sde hl na h' n t te c s
d nt eh i gui l e e ha xt nd
rm
i o 1 s r t . I a ton t t s t e ar sm al biat alhyœ ocel . Tbe r ghtl tcl
nt he c q um n ddii o hi . hc e l lc es i es i e
m eas es 3. x 2. . The l t cl m eas w 3.1x2.= .W eel si t omi nce o t
ur 4 2œ eA ee e tul ' 1 r s ll pr ne f he
l R e di ri l tm ea u= 1.7 .Not g elei no e .
e pi dyrts ha s cm hm s s t
I PRESSI :
M ON
n e e i a l r e qui colm ton t text
r s ag d l i ha ends ilo t) s r um a t f di s d be
r le c ot nd he m ngg houl
t
clni l co w l t d w ih as ie &om 1 a o e e e ng t ougbouta l f i i lbe i
i Y y t a e t ct s he M m n xt ndi br v t ngu na nnm
C lni lconvl Eon t t sobs r ton. Pe àapsa CT s a e
i ca a o hi e va i r c n xnmi i oft ew l e e ng
nnton .h ds xtndi
downwa i ot s rtlamai rcomme d f f t re uat
d nt he coa se ùde or urhe val i
on .
%
1
!
G Uz
1
f ï
t h
! 'l
(, '
-
!
k
t
R> d by:G nron M endez,Jr M . -
. D '
t
t
.
'
D : 6/ 1 11
2/ i
.
t g
T: 6/ l' 1
2 zl
GNlj
-
as
T i rp r wJ ee o ial sg e yGm w! eK' J.. M D.
b s c ot ' l drn c l in db
s y M ee r
z
YZ
-
28. '
Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 28 of 43
'
,
%x jjz
*.v a
kj/
. &
( 't
n m
;
'
:
' ,
t
. ' ..
..
SO U T H E A ST ER N
k
* / . - U N 1 N. E R S l T 3:
)
, .
-*
7
. .è ê
ttF ofost opat 1 M ed- ne
: ;)
,
, e h-
c 1
ci
N SU Davi I er M edi ne
e nt nal ci
3200 S U ni siy Drve
ver t i
D avi FL 33328-
e, . 2018
Phone :954) 4100
( 262-
Fax :954) 3285
( 262-
PAT i N T:
E Tr an Bu duveanu
ai j
DATE 0 F Bl RTH : 12/ 1/
1 1954
DATE: 09/ 2011 10: AM
28/ 30
V I 6F IY P E:
S- - O fi V i t
fce si
ShifCot ai / son f vi t
tt npl ntRea or si:
lhi 51 yearol mal pr
's 3 d e esent wih check- .
s t up
Fit 1,of r se Ines
s- . f e nt l s
o$
- l
1. C h(ck- p
3 U
56 y/ Romani mal wih a hi of ofHepati C compl i and Di esType 2 pr
t
a an e t st y is
t i ons
cat abet esent her as a f l -
s e olow
tp bi tfum 3 mont ago.He has nothad any hospialadm i ons orER vi t He had a CT scan oft
1 ' r
si hs t ssi sis he
abeorl donewhi showed Massi Acii sugges ie ofcir s aswelasspl
yen ch ve tes tv rosi l enomegal Hi onl com pl nt
.
y s y ai
i a m or lg f i t seem st alevi e t oughoutt dayt has been ongoi f aboutt past5 mott
s
F! ni atgue hat
l o l at hr he hat ng or he nhs
e ias no f
l everorchil,t e i no nausea,vom ii ordi r
l her s
s' tng, areah.Ther have been no epi
e sodes ofshorness of
t
br h ordyspnea.
eat
FO PIRecot
I ded by:Gar HilDO
y l
lui anu, aa DOB:1 1 / 954 Pa l4
l duve Tr in 2/ 1 1 ge: /
30. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 30 of 43
DI
AGNOSTI RADI OLO9Y CONSULTANTS OG RAPHY
C RADI Y- PUTERI TOM
OLOG COM ZED
21 AcR AGCREDI MAMOGRAPHY*
TEP UVTRASOUND*
MRI
0 SOUTH FEDERALHI
TE
GHWAY *SECONP FLOOR *HOL YWOOD, ORI 3 0
L FL DA 3 20
L( . 1776* ( - 0069
954/927- FM 954)927-
Vl mi Gr a,M. ,Boar Cerii Radi ogi
adi r nj D. d tfed ol st
PatentNam e:
i TRAI BUJDUVEANU
AN Account#: 170321
Ref rng Physi an' DR .GARY R HI
eri ci . LL Dat ofBit
e rh: 12/ 1954
11/
Dat ofSer ce:
e vi 06/ 3/ 1
1 201
CT SCAN O F THE ABD O M EN:
TEC HNI UE:CT oft abdom en was peror ed usi 16 det orCT t
Q he f m ng ed echnol w ih 5 m m .
ogy t
spaci aferor contast.
ng' t al r
FI NGS: er i s ie a ct sn td s rou dn t e l er ss ee Th l eri n
NDI Tà e sma sv s i oe u r n ij h i an pl n. e i s ot
e v v
enar d. la pe st s o l ult s ra e, ih l c a il wl da o i o
l ge t p ar o h w ob aej u fc whc s omp tbe t ign ss f
h
cir s. The spl i enl ged. The adr s ar unr
r hosi een s ar enal e emar e. The ki
kabl dneys dem onst at
r e
j odc dialhc n s .No r al s s.Noh d on p o i.No kdn yson s Th a t
o o c t ik e s en mas e y r e hrss i e t e . e ora
I cal sed and no aneuls . No par aori adenopat y. No bowel senton.
s ci m a- t c h dit i
I PRESSI N:
M O
M ASSI ASCI
VE TES. RELATI
VELY SM ALL LO BULATED SURFAC E O F THE LI
VER
SUGGESTI OF CI
VE RRHOSI M I SPLENOM EGAL
S. LD Y.
'> . .
# . .
VLADI I G RNJ ,M .
M R A D.
VG/gr
6/ 2011 1: 20 PM
13/ 22:
31. Case 1:11-cv-20120-PAS Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2011 Page 31 of 43
US RETRO PERI N EUM
TO G REEN ,W I AM L -694709
LLI
*Fi Repor *
nal t
Res tNp
ul e: Us RETROPERI TONEUM
Resuldat
t e: Jul 07,20119: AM
y 31
Resulst us'
t at . Auh( ie
t Verid)
f
Resultte:
t l us RETROPERI TONEUM
Pedormed by! TULRAM- PERSAU D,DEVIœ Jul 07,m 11 9: AM
y 31 r
Encount i o:
er nf 213081624,NBMC,OP,7/ m 11 -7 9/
7/ / 2011
* Fi Repod *
nal
Reason ForExam
URINARY INCONTINENCE NOS
READ
ULTRASO UND O F THE RETR O PERI NEUM :
TO
CLI CAL HI RY:Urnar i
NI STO i y ncontnence.
i
Renalulr
tasound.
R i ki
ght dney m easur 9. x 4 cm . The l tone m easur 9. x 5. cm . No hydr
es 6 ef es 4 6 onephr s.
osi
No s ac o cup ig l i s sq t i teki ey Nor a c cfc t
p e-c yn eson u eced n h dn s. en l ali ai Sl ticras
i ons. i n e ed
gh
echogeni t oft r
ciy he enalcorex I t I tki
t n he ef dney,coul be r at t nephr er s.
d el ed o oscl osi
Ulr
tasound oft bl
he adder.
Pr d bl
evoi adderm easur 9. x 8. x 8 cm wih a t alvol e of353 m L. M i m alr dual
es 6 7 t ot um ni esi
urne afervoi ng. Resi
i t di dualof9 m L.
Nor alsi pr t e gl
m ze os at and. No bl
adderm asses orcal fcatons.
cii i
I PRESSI N:
M O
W E SUSPECT LEFT NEPHROSCLEROSI NO HYDRO NEPHROSI O R
S. S
SPACE- OCCUPYI LESI
NG ONS I THE KI
N DNEYS.
Prnt by:
i ed M HALSKY MD.M I
CHAEL Page 1 of2
Prnt on:
i ed 7/
20Q011 1: PM
03 ( tnu d)
Con i e