Here at Rush Star Wireless we see our teammates more than just colleagues, we value each other as family. As such our company culture and daily routines are a reflection of it.
Everyday here at Rush Star Wireless, we constantly learn from one another through various activities such as company potlucks, company events, trade shows and simply collaborating with each other at the office.
This slideshow is a representation of our culture here at Rush Star Wireless. We hope to add more talented individuals to join us in our festive events and we want to learn more about you! Visit us for more information:
http://www.rushstarwireless.com/careers
Haber yazmak ve haber yazımı sırasında özellikle haberciliğe yeni başlayan öğrencilere yol gösterecek sık yapılan yanlışlar ve dikkat edilecek hususları içeren bir sunum.
Not: Bu sunumda bahsi geçen haber yazımı yanlışları Haber ve Röportaj Teknikleri dersi öğrencilerinin sık yaptığı hatalardan seçilmiştir.
Yrd. Doç. Dr. Javanshir Gadimov, Zirve Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Öğretim Üyesi
How Stephen Miller Seized the Moment to Battle Immigration B.docxpooleavelina
How Stephen Miller Seized the Moment to Battle Immigration
By Jason DeParle
The New York Times
August 27, 2019
WASHINGTON—When historians try to explain how opponents of immigration
captured the Republican Party, they may turn to the spring of 2007, when George W.
Bush threw his waning powers behind a legalization plan and conservative populists
buried it in scorn.
Mr. Bush was so taken aback, he said he worried about America “losing its soul,” and
immigration politics have never been the same.
That spring was significant for another reason, too: An intense young man with wary,
hooded eyes and fiercely anti-immigrant views graduated from college and began a
meteoric rise as a Republican operative. With the timing of a screenplay, the man and
the moment converged.
Stephen Miller was 22 and looking for work in Washington. He lacked government
experience but had media appearances on talk radio and Fox News and a history of
pushing causes like “Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week.” A first-term congresswoman
from Minnesota offered him a job interview and discovered they were reading the same
book: a polemic warning that Muslim immigration cold mean “the end of the world as
we know it.”
By the end of the interview, Representative Michele Bachmann had a new press
secretary. And a dozen years later, Mr. Miller, now a senior adviser to President Trump,
is presiding over one of the most fervent attacks on immigration in American history.
The story of Mr. Miller’s rise has been told with a focus on his pugnacity and paradoxes.
Known more for his enemies than his friends, he is a conservative firebrand from liberal
Santa Monica, Calif., and a descendant of refugees who is seeking to eliminate refugee
programs. He is a Duke graduate in bespoke suits who rails against the perfidy of so-
called elites. Among those who have questioned his moral fitness are his uncle, his
childhood rabbi and 3,400 fellow Duke alumni.
Less attention has been paid to the forces that have abetted his rise and eroded
Republican support for immigration — forces Mr. Miller has personified and advanced
in a career unusually reflective of its times.
Rising fears of terrorism after the Sept. 11 attacks brought new calls to keep immigrants
out. Declining need for industrial labor left fewer businesses clamoring to bring them in.
A surge of migrants across the South stoked a backlash in the party’s geographic base.
Conservative media, once divided, turned against immigration, and immigration-
reduction groups that had operated on the margins grew in numbers and sophistication.
Abandoning calls for minority outreach, the Republican Party chose instead to energize
2
its conservative white base — heeding strategists who said the immigrant vote was not
just a lost cause but an existential threat.
Arriving in Washington as these forces coalesced, Mr. Miller rode the tailwinds with zeal
and skill. Warning of terrorism and disturbed by multic ...
Body ImageCOLLAPSETop of FormI choose a study that was in .docxrichardnorman90310
Body Image
COLLAPSE
Top of Form
I choose a study that was in the personality and individual differences group that was titled “Personality and Body Image in Young Woman”. As a participant I was asked to answer a lot of questions about my body and how I felt about it.
For this study I believe that this research is applied. Why? Well first let’s see what the book says about applied research “applied research investigates issues that have implications for everyday life and provide solutions to everyday problems” (Stangor 2015). Although some may disagree about what type of research this, I believe that this is applied because it deals with everyday issues and people have been trying to find solutions for this problem for many years. Body image has been a battle in the world for many young women, some even dating back to pre-teen and teen years.
I believe that some of the strengths would be allowing woman to express body images completely anonymous without fear of someone knowing it was them. Also, it allows woman to recognize the body image issues that they have by “forcing” them to identify what they dislike about themselves. I think some of the limitations is it being anonymous (I know you are screaming but let me explain). I believe that this study being anonymous makes it seem like the woman is alone in this self-conscious world. When in fact there are many and I mean MANY women, who struggle with this. Another limitation is at the end there is no next step to take after you complete the study. Woman need to know what is next and what they can to help themselves.
Over all I believe that this study does make you do self-reflection.
Stangor, C. (2015). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (5th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning
Bottom of Form
How Stephen Miller Seized the Moment to Battle Immigration
By Jason DeParle
The New York Times
August 27, 2019
WASHINGTON—When historians try to explain how opponents of immigration
captured the Republican Party, they may turn to the spring of 2007, when George W.
Bush threw his waning powers behind a legalization plan and conservative populists
buried it in scorn.
Mr. Bush was so taken aback, he said he worried about America “losing its soul,” and
immigration politics have never been the same.
That spring was significant for another reason, too: An intense young man with wary,
hooded eyes and fiercely anti-immigrant views graduated from college and began a
meteoric rise as a Republican operative. With the timing of a screenplay, the man and
the moment converged.
Stephen Miller was 22 and looking for work in Washington. He lacked government
experience but had media appearances on talk radio and Fox News and a history of
pushing causes like “Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week.” A first-term congresswoman
from Minnesota offered him a job interview and discovered they were reading the same
book: a polemic warning that Muslim immigration cold mean “the end of the world a.
The West’s View on Islam/Muslims: Islamophobia?Amira Daghache
This research paper will take a deeper look at the West’s view of Islam and asks questions whether it’s all Islamophobia or something deeper. It details how it started, who’s encouraging it and why, who’s benefiting from it, how it’s viewed in other mediums, how it affected Muslims, who are the most prominent public figures fighting it and how it become different in recent years.
Why a Christian in the White House Felt Betrayed
For Republicans who fear that the Foley scandal might keep Evangelicals away from the polls in November, here
Here at Rush Star Wireless we see our teammates more than just colleagues, we value each other as family. As such our company culture and daily routines are a reflection of it.
Everyday here at Rush Star Wireless, we constantly learn from one another through various activities such as company potlucks, company events, trade shows and simply collaborating with each other at the office.
This slideshow is a representation of our culture here at Rush Star Wireless. We hope to add more talented individuals to join us in our festive events and we want to learn more about you! Visit us for more information:
http://www.rushstarwireless.com/careers
Haber yazmak ve haber yazımı sırasında özellikle haberciliğe yeni başlayan öğrencilere yol gösterecek sık yapılan yanlışlar ve dikkat edilecek hususları içeren bir sunum.
Not: Bu sunumda bahsi geçen haber yazımı yanlışları Haber ve Röportaj Teknikleri dersi öğrencilerinin sık yaptığı hatalardan seçilmiştir.
Yrd. Doç. Dr. Javanshir Gadimov, Zirve Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Öğretim Üyesi
How Stephen Miller Seized the Moment to Battle Immigration B.docxpooleavelina
How Stephen Miller Seized the Moment to Battle Immigration
By Jason DeParle
The New York Times
August 27, 2019
WASHINGTON—When historians try to explain how opponents of immigration
captured the Republican Party, they may turn to the spring of 2007, when George W.
Bush threw his waning powers behind a legalization plan and conservative populists
buried it in scorn.
Mr. Bush was so taken aback, he said he worried about America “losing its soul,” and
immigration politics have never been the same.
That spring was significant for another reason, too: An intense young man with wary,
hooded eyes and fiercely anti-immigrant views graduated from college and began a
meteoric rise as a Republican operative. With the timing of a screenplay, the man and
the moment converged.
Stephen Miller was 22 and looking for work in Washington. He lacked government
experience but had media appearances on talk radio and Fox News and a history of
pushing causes like “Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week.” A first-term congresswoman
from Minnesota offered him a job interview and discovered they were reading the same
book: a polemic warning that Muslim immigration cold mean “the end of the world as
we know it.”
By the end of the interview, Representative Michele Bachmann had a new press
secretary. And a dozen years later, Mr. Miller, now a senior adviser to President Trump,
is presiding over one of the most fervent attacks on immigration in American history.
The story of Mr. Miller’s rise has been told with a focus on his pugnacity and paradoxes.
Known more for his enemies than his friends, he is a conservative firebrand from liberal
Santa Monica, Calif., and a descendant of refugees who is seeking to eliminate refugee
programs. He is a Duke graduate in bespoke suits who rails against the perfidy of so-
called elites. Among those who have questioned his moral fitness are his uncle, his
childhood rabbi and 3,400 fellow Duke alumni.
Less attention has been paid to the forces that have abetted his rise and eroded
Republican support for immigration — forces Mr. Miller has personified and advanced
in a career unusually reflective of its times.
Rising fears of terrorism after the Sept. 11 attacks brought new calls to keep immigrants
out. Declining need for industrial labor left fewer businesses clamoring to bring them in.
A surge of migrants across the South stoked a backlash in the party’s geographic base.
Conservative media, once divided, turned against immigration, and immigration-
reduction groups that had operated on the margins grew in numbers and sophistication.
Abandoning calls for minority outreach, the Republican Party chose instead to energize
2
its conservative white base — heeding strategists who said the immigrant vote was not
just a lost cause but an existential threat.
Arriving in Washington as these forces coalesced, Mr. Miller rode the tailwinds with zeal
and skill. Warning of terrorism and disturbed by multic ...
Body ImageCOLLAPSETop of FormI choose a study that was in .docxrichardnorman90310
Body Image
COLLAPSE
Top of Form
I choose a study that was in the personality and individual differences group that was titled “Personality and Body Image in Young Woman”. As a participant I was asked to answer a lot of questions about my body and how I felt about it.
For this study I believe that this research is applied. Why? Well first let’s see what the book says about applied research “applied research investigates issues that have implications for everyday life and provide solutions to everyday problems” (Stangor 2015). Although some may disagree about what type of research this, I believe that this is applied because it deals with everyday issues and people have been trying to find solutions for this problem for many years. Body image has been a battle in the world for many young women, some even dating back to pre-teen and teen years.
I believe that some of the strengths would be allowing woman to express body images completely anonymous without fear of someone knowing it was them. Also, it allows woman to recognize the body image issues that they have by “forcing” them to identify what they dislike about themselves. I think some of the limitations is it being anonymous (I know you are screaming but let me explain). I believe that this study being anonymous makes it seem like the woman is alone in this self-conscious world. When in fact there are many and I mean MANY women, who struggle with this. Another limitation is at the end there is no next step to take after you complete the study. Woman need to know what is next and what they can to help themselves.
Over all I believe that this study does make you do self-reflection.
Stangor, C. (2015). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (5th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning
Bottom of Form
How Stephen Miller Seized the Moment to Battle Immigration
By Jason DeParle
The New York Times
August 27, 2019
WASHINGTON—When historians try to explain how opponents of immigration
captured the Republican Party, they may turn to the spring of 2007, when George W.
Bush threw his waning powers behind a legalization plan and conservative populists
buried it in scorn.
Mr. Bush was so taken aback, he said he worried about America “losing its soul,” and
immigration politics have never been the same.
That spring was significant for another reason, too: An intense young man with wary,
hooded eyes and fiercely anti-immigrant views graduated from college and began a
meteoric rise as a Republican operative. With the timing of a screenplay, the man and
the moment converged.
Stephen Miller was 22 and looking for work in Washington. He lacked government
experience but had media appearances on talk radio and Fox News and a history of
pushing causes like “Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week.” A first-term congresswoman
from Minnesota offered him a job interview and discovered they were reading the same
book: a polemic warning that Muslim immigration cold mean “the end of the world a.
The West’s View on Islam/Muslims: Islamophobia?Amira Daghache
This research paper will take a deeper look at the West’s view of Islam and asks questions whether it’s all Islamophobia or something deeper. It details how it started, who’s encouraging it and why, who’s benefiting from it, how it’s viewed in other mediums, how it affected Muslims, who are the most prominent public figures fighting it and how it become different in recent years.
Why a Christian in the White House Felt Betrayed
For Republicans who fear that the Foley scandal might keep Evangelicals away from the polls in November, here
The Impact of Martin Luther King’s Religious Life During the Civil Rights Str...AJHSSR Journal
ABSTRACT: This paper shows how Charles Johnson‟simaginative storyintertwines with that ofMartin Luther
King‟s religious lifeas one of the Blacks‟ leaders in the Civil RightsMovement of the 1950s and 1960s. Itis in
fact, theanalysisof King‟s nonviolent struggle for an equalitarian American society.His religious lifehas
undoubtedly influenced the institutionalized disequilibriumof common considerations based on the inequality
and injustice between Blacks and Whites in the United States. This means that King‟speaceful fight for justice is
based on hisfaith in God, constant prayers, and love for their enemies in the United States.
Keywords: Religious life, Injustice, nonviolent struggle, prayers, Civil Rights.
MSNBC's Chris Matthews suggests Christians have no place in politics - National Policy & Issues
1. MSNBC's Chris Matthews suggests Christians have no place
in politics - National Policy & Issues
John M. Heller/Getty Images
On Tuesday, MSNBC's Chris Matthews suggested that Christians, specifically conservative
evangelical Christians, have no place in the American political system. Newsbusters' Mark
Finkelstein said Matthews attacked Jeb Bush for a planned appearance at Liberty University. His
criticism, however, wasn't limited to Bush.
"It seems to me watching this thing, somewhat dispassionately, I've noticed for example that Jeb
Bush is now going to give a commencement speech at Liberty University," he said. "You know he's a
Roman Catholic convert. His family was Episcopalian. And somehow he finds himself comfortable in
that evangelical crowd."
"His father had to do some of that stooping last time he ran. He had to go out and say things he was
born again and all that," he added. "He had to say things he was never taught religiously in his
growing-up years." Matthews then included all Republicans in his rant.
"They have to do all this--Ted Cruz was at Regent or Liberty," he said. "They're all -- does the
Republican candidate in 2016 have to be focused on the religious right? Do you have to tag that base
before you can be the nominee?" he asked as though conservative Christians have no right to be
http://www.masslive.com/sports/ involved in the American political system. Matt Schlapp, chairman
of the American Conservative Union, informed Matthews that Christians are an search engine
important part of GOP politics.
"Well, there's two things there," he said. "First of all, evangelical voters, this is a totally legitimate
group of people to go after."
Matthews responded by asking if Republicans "have
to tag up with" Christians. Schlapp explained that for
many, faith is extremely important, especially in
politics.
"Look, the question of faith in our politics is
important," he told Matthews. "And evangelical
Christians, born-again voters are an important
constituency. And it's a very important consistency for the Republicans.
Matthews suggestion that Christians should be excluded from American politics is nothing new.
Writing at the Christian Post, Karen Kramer said religious liberty is the central theme of what she
called "the new civil war." Moreover, she said Christians are partly to blame for not standing up for
their rights.
Kramer said Christians "have stood idle while a vocal minority has placed unfair burdens" on them.
"Even though we face formidable foreign enemies, the battle within our own nation could be our
demise because we're fighting for our very soul," she said.
2. Finkelstein speculated what would happen if Matthews had targeted another religion. "Let's play
some political madlibs and imagine that instead of 'stooping to that evangelical crowd,' Matthews
had criticized a candidate who spoke at an Islamic center for 'stooping to that Muslim crowd,'"
Finkelstein said. "Cue the cries of religious bigotry!"