PRESTIGE INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT DEWAS

    Best PhD Thesis Award in Management
           4-5, February 2011, India




        Good Afternoon
Workers Empowerment: A Study of Polyhydron
          Private Limited, Belgaum

                               M M Bagali, PhD
                             Dean-MBA programme
                              Professor of SHRM

                                   JAIN University, India
                                  sanbag@rediffmail.com




                                (A Five Star NACC Accredited)
                             Research Student, Management Studies
 Kousali Institute of Management Studies (KIMS), Karnatak University, Dharwad, Karnataka State
agenda




• Why such study in empowerment area
• How and what this company uniquely practiced
• Lessons to learn from Research outcomes
HR is an asset

“you can get the workplace systems, style of
management, and organize capital and erect
building, but it takes people to build a business”




Thomas J WATSON
Founder of IBM
Agenda 01
                                basis for the present work


HR is essential requirement for progress and development of the country

The front line employees are the KEY cutting edge

The organisations have to be totally people centric

A Paradigm shift focusing ‘HR’ is needed


Infact, empowering employee would be crucial in evolving appropriate
strategies, as HR is the single most valuable resources that can make a
quantum difference
therefore , the need



To look at the Renaissance Strategies for Creating High Performance
Workforce

The syntax of empowerment is simple… give people the freedom and
power at workplace, they will surely grow the organisation

Thus, an enquiry into various empowerment strategies and practices
the vital questions before us

What do we mean by empowerment?

How different is empowerment from other organizational practices?

How do we empower?

Can everyone be empowered in the organization?

What's the Role of leadership in empowerment exercise, and

What empowerment does to everyone…. Individual; Organisational; and the
Leaders
the studies
• Pati,1997        • Barnes and Kaftans,
• Sengupta and       1970, 1985
  Shaikh,1997      • Myron Eichen,1989
• Venkatachalam,   • Marjorie Reynolds,
  1998               1991
• Dwivedi,1998     • Michael Quarrey,
• Mohapatra,1998     1992
• Tripathy,1999    • Cyndy Payne,1993
                   • Bo Burlingham, 1999
Reference              Brief Description                 Major Theme/Summary

Menon(1999,in press)   Psychological approach            The empowered state is a
                                                         psychological state characterized by
                                                         perceived control. Perceived control,
                                                         perceived competence goals.

Liden&Arad(1996)       Power perspective                 Empowerment research should be
                                                         subsumed under the rubric of power

Spreitzer(1995)        Psychological motivational        Empowerment is increased intrinsic
                       approach                          motivation manifested in four
                                                         cognitions: competence, self –
                                                         determination and impact.

Eylon(1994)            Process approach                  Empowerment is an enhancing and
                                                         energizing context specific process
                                                         that expands feelings of trust and
                                                         control

Conger(1989)           Leadership approach               Empowering subordinates is a major
                                                         component of leadership

Yukl(1989)             Transformational Leadership       The effect of the transformational
                       approach                          influence is to empower subordinates
                                                         to participate in the process of
                                                         transforming the organization

House (1988)           Focus on perceived control        Empowered employees are those
                                                         who feel confident and in control of
                                                         their environments.

Block (1986)           Focus on employee                 To feel empowered is to
                       involvement                  a)     feel responsible for one’s actions
                                                           b) to have a sense of purpose in
                                                           achieving something worthwhile,
                                                           and c) to commit to achieving that
                                                           purpose

Burke (1986)           Leadership approach               Leaders empower subordinates by
                                                         providing clarity of direction which
                                                         encompasses a higher purpose or
                                                         worthy cause

Bennis & Nanus(1985)   Leadership approach               Leaders energies (hence empower)
                                                         through psychological identification.
                                                         The critical dimensions of
                                                         empowerment are significance,

85 best research work                                    competence, community and
                                                         enjoyment /fun
work of prominence

• Foundation for Enterprise Development – FED, and Beyster Institute for
  Entrepreneurial Employee Ownership , USA

• Argyris, Chris (1998):“Empowerment: The Emperor’s new Clothes”,
  Harvard Business Review, May-June, pp: 98 -105

• Kantar, R. M , 1977, 1979, 1989,1995

• Lawler, E. E III , 1986, 1988, 1992, 1994, 1995
Theoretical and Conceptual framework

                               E M POWER M E N T
                              em-pow-er-ment (im-pau [-] r-ment)

                           Oxford English Dictionary says, to empower is
                                    “to authorize, to enable”



                                 Rosabeth Moss Kanter (1977)
                             Professor at Harvard Business School,
                                Ernest L. Arbuckle Professorship

       “giving power to people who operate at an advantage in the organization success”

                                      Bowen and Lawler (1992)
         Director, the Centre for Effective Organization, University of Southern California,
“ Complete Power to make decisions that influence organizational direction and performance”
essentially, empowerment …
• it liberates people from constraints such as checking with
  the boss before taking actions

• absolute control is given up, allowing everyone make
  decisions, and can set goals

• decision-making authority and responsibility percolates
  from managers to the employees at the lowest rung
• people are given total freedom to do their job, and are
  trusted, made accountable and responsible
characteristics of              conditions for empowerment
empowered organization
                                Power to act
shared responsibility           Participation at all levels
individual accountability       Way for innovation
flat organizational hierarchy   Transparency in organizational
                                activities
autonomous work teams           Accountability for one’s action
high belief and trust           Right kind of leadership
leadership at all levels        Autonomy to work
                                Way to release extra energy
climate of collaboration
                                Proper recognition and
atmosphere of openness          appreciation
freedom from all                Climate of trust and faith
                                A learning culture
the phd work
Workers Empowerment : A Study of
Polyhydron Private Limited, Belgaum,
Karnataka State, India
Established in 1981-82




Address:80, Machhe Industrial Estate,Machhe, Belgaum- 590014. Karnataka State
www.polyhydron.com
research objectives

   to understand factors that contribute to empowerment--the systems, practices, policy and
    the leadership

   To understand management practices impacting on employee behavior, thus empowering
    employees

   made to understand all factors that              contributed   to   empowerment--the
    systems, practices, policy and leadership

   An effort was also made to see how these management practices impacted upon
    employee behavior

Supporting Objectives :

Do we really need empowered people? Is empowerment something that can be done to
some one, or is it something a person must choose? What role does the person in the
top have to play in this exercise? With all these objectives, the genesis of
empowerment is probed at a macro level.
hypothesis
Ha1         Empowerment is a sense of belonging developed by employee as a
result of various coherent organizational practices and practices;

Ha2       A good Organizational climate would shape behavior and develop
positive attitudes towards organizational growth and development leading to
employee empowerment;

Ha3      Access to information about the mission, value, goals, and vision of an
organization is positively related to empowerment;

Ha4    If an organization aspires for fundamental changes while empowering
employees, it must change the present way of functioning; and

Ha5      Empowerment at the workplace makes leaderless.
participation




Total 73   Responded 60
areas of enquiry


Accountability / Bureaucracy / Culture / Leadership/
Management Style and approach / Structure / liberty /
Communication / Decision Making / Discipline/ Ethos /
Industrial Democracy / Knowledge Sharing / Ownership
Culture / Organizational Health / Power Distribution/
Responsibility Sharing / Transparency / Information sharing
/ Degree of trust & loyalty……….

total of 75 areas
data collection
The format of Data collection from Employees




                                                Pre Pilot
                                               Observation



            Observed the                                                  Pooling all the
              System                                                       responses




                           Questionnaire                          Discussion
                                                                  with CEO
                           Administered

                                                  Case-by-
                                                    Case
                                                 discussion
The format of Data collection from CEO / MD



  Observed the                                               Pooling all
    system                                                  responses in
                                                             presence of
                                                                 all

          Discussion                                  Back to
           with CEO                                    CEO




                        System/        Case by case    •        An in-formal observation over a period
                       Practices        discussion
                       interface

                                                       •        Discussion with CEO at one-one level

                                                       •        The opinions of CEO and system interfaced

                                                                All the collected data of CEO through opinions were
                                                                observed, verified case by case with each employees

                                                       •        The opinions / views of employees were put back to CEO /
                                                                MD for discussion, and

                                                       •        Open House
Agenda 02
                               what we saw at ppl



 •   Estd                                1981-82
 •   Conventional way of Management      1982-1988
 •   Visit to SEMCO, Sau Paulo, Brazil   1988
 •   Changed People practices            1988-1996
 •   Empowered People practices          1996 onwards
empowerment@workplace


•The HR practices
•The Culture
•The Leadership, and the
•The Traits
changed workplace

empowerment@work: the making of an empowered workforce

Conventional                    Present

Do what is told                 Do what is required
Liberty misused                 Liberty made use to fullest extent
Not my job attitude             Its everyone's job
Commitment level low            High commitment
Boundary defined                No Boundary
Lack of scope for improvement   High scope for improvement
Various committees / councils   Never a designated committee
Trust level low                 Trust is core
Supervised work                 No Supervision
Freedom restricted              More freedom / liberty
Closed behavior                 Transparent behavior
Apply for leave / off           Decide on leave / off
the culture
                                  •Value given to Human beings

                                  •Each is accountable / responsible for his
                                  actions and can’t blame others

the hr practices                  •All information is open and shared
Complete Freedom
Total Transparency                •Each is boss in himself
Complete Shared Responsibility
                                  •Common rooms are shared
Accountability for ones actions
Liberty to decide course of       •Suggestions are given regularly and open
actions
Involvement / Participation       •Management is open to ideas and more
Transparent feedback              information sharing
Delegated authority
                                  •Every one can have own
No hidden Agenda                  objectives, mission, and goals;
Complete Autonomy
Power to take decisions           •No Security or guard
employee traits
                                                  Open and Transparent
                                                     Positive Approach
                                                    No defined mind set
                                                        Free from Bias
leadership                                        No scapegoat attitude
Freedom to do work in one’s own way                  High Commitment
No Supervision/ Foreman                                      Disciplined
No Bureaucratic and Administrative interference             Trustworthy
No Red-tapism                                          Enjoys the work
Sharing Common Platform                              Loyal and Truthful
Trusting each persons actions                       Work that extra mile
No restrictions for new inventions
One can fail, no punishment
Suggestions are part of daily work
Accepts critics
Open House
ceo’s reactions
•   you have done a mistake and let us all look at it;
•   my door is always open for discussions;
•   let us all discuss on your idea;
•   how to solve your problem…. your problem is our problem;
•   any ideas from your side to contribute;
•   you are the boss of the organization;
•   I look for everyone in joining hands with me;
•   you have done a good work, let us all learn lessons from you;
•   let me join you in helping you;
•   please teach me the new techniques that you have learnt;
•   let me announce your achievements to others;
•   You will arrange a programme for sharing your successful story,
language@workplace



My door is open to you
Let us all discuss on the idea
Your problem / issue is our concern
Let us join hands together
Kindly teach me the new technique
Let us all announce your achievement
outcome of such practices

•   Engagement with Organsiation
•   Product Innovation
•   Profits and Income Scaled
•   Turnover and loyalty
•   Reputation and Customers
•   Market Standing
•   NO IR issues
•   Employer BRANDING
drawbacks
•   Why power to me
•   Is it the game plan of management
•   Its not my job to have power
•   Its not my job to decide
•   I am not the right person to have power
•   My me as leader and decision maker
the impressions
Adi Godrej,
Chairman and MD, Godrej Soaps ltd,1992
       “It has opened my eyes in best people management practices”

Ricardo F Semler,
Chairman, SEMCO, Brazil, 1994
       “I have seen an exceptionally empowerment practiced at
  workplace”

Sri Sharadrao Pawar,
Ex-CM, present Cabinet Minister, GOI,1997
        “Congrats for good work done in people management strategies”
Agenda 03

   Ideas for practices: lessons to learn
 •First ‘No’ RULE              Don’t hold unto data
 •Platform for Empowerment /   Informal Relations
 create conditions for         Create Opportunity
 empowerment                   Desired Future
 •Prioritise the area          Education the gains
 •Attitudinal Surveys          Time to empower or not to
 •Accountability                  empower
 •Define the Purpose           Can’t empower areas
 •Open Door Policy and         Don’t impose empowerment
 Transparency                  Power of Empowerment
 •Ownership Culture            Fun at workplace
academic discussion
•   OB                         advantage corporate
•   HR practices
•   HRM / SHRM                 • CEO
•   Leadership                 • HR Chief
•   Organizational Change      • Chief Peoples Officer
•   Restructuring / OD         • Dean and Directors of
•   Sociology of Culture         MBA
•   Change Management          • MDP’s
At Prestige Institute
Courses in



OB/ HR
Basics in Management
Leadership
Group Dynamics
future research


Compare empowerment with less / no empowerment organisation

Compare empowerment strategies amongst male and female

Compare with Public X Private sector company

Compare with Small x Medium X Large

Retired / leftover employees survey or opinion can also be had
thank you
sanbag@rediffmail.com / sanbagsanbag@rediffmail.com
About PhD
• At MBA dept, Karnatak University, Dharwad,
  Karnataka State / A 5 Star NACC graded
• Dr. A H Chachadi, Professor, Guide
• Evaluated by XLRI and IIM-K Professors
• Between 2000-2008 work undertaken
• 299 pages total
• 311 references
• Awarded on 16th March, 2008
Endorsement on the Work
XLRI Editor,
when published in XLRI-Management and Labour Studies Journal

    The article printed below is a truly extraordinary example of employee
    empowerment. The methods followed by the organisation studied would be
    considered revolutionary anywhere in the world and even more so in India.
    Infact, one sometimes wonders how the whole effort did not end in chaos. The
    company has apparently succeeded in developing a work force and a leadership
    almost devoid of the foibles of most other humans. (Printed on the Article XLRI-Management and
    Labour Studies, 26,2,April, 2001, pp.109-119)




Executive Director,
Indian Journal of Training and Development, ISTD, India

    The article published in the area of Empowerment in ISTD has been adjudged as
    the Best Paper published during the year-2001. Kindly accept our Heartiest
    Congratulations.
(22July, 2002 / Through Personal Letter)
Yoon, Jeong,
    Professor of ob and hr,
    AJOU university, South Korea




Yoon, Jeong (2001).“The role of structure and motivation for
workplace empowerment: The case of Korean employees”,
Social Psychology Quarterly, 64 (2); pp. 195 – 206
Presentation to Senior HR Managers,
of SHRI on Empowerment, part of present work




          2003, September
Polyhydron Mission
We will nurture an Ethically Managed Organisation.
              We will not exploit our
Customer, Employees, Suppliers, Government, Soci
                  ety and Nature

                 Polyhydron Vision
   We will create an island of Excellence through
 focus on Customer, Employee Empowerment and
             continuous improvement.
PPL
Harvard Business Review
            HBR, July-August, 2010, p:57



When workers are made to feel empowered,
      the whole organization wins



            Roger L MARTIN,
      Dean, Rotman School of Management
         University of Toronto, Canada

MM Bagali .......Final presentation prestige 2011

  • 1.
    PRESTIGE INSTITUTE OFMANAGEMENT DEWAS Best PhD Thesis Award in Management 4-5, February 2011, India Good Afternoon
  • 2.
    Workers Empowerment: AStudy of Polyhydron Private Limited, Belgaum M M Bagali, PhD Dean-MBA programme Professor of SHRM JAIN University, India sanbag@rediffmail.com (A Five Star NACC Accredited) Research Student, Management Studies Kousali Institute of Management Studies (KIMS), Karnatak University, Dharwad, Karnataka State
  • 3.
    agenda • Why suchstudy in empowerment area • How and what this company uniquely practiced • Lessons to learn from Research outcomes
  • 4.
    HR is anasset “you can get the workplace systems, style of management, and organize capital and erect building, but it takes people to build a business” Thomas J WATSON Founder of IBM
  • 5.
    Agenda 01 basis for the present work HR is essential requirement for progress and development of the country The front line employees are the KEY cutting edge The organisations have to be totally people centric A Paradigm shift focusing ‘HR’ is needed Infact, empowering employee would be crucial in evolving appropriate strategies, as HR is the single most valuable resources that can make a quantum difference
  • 6.
    therefore , theneed To look at the Renaissance Strategies for Creating High Performance Workforce The syntax of empowerment is simple… give people the freedom and power at workplace, they will surely grow the organisation Thus, an enquiry into various empowerment strategies and practices
  • 7.
    the vital questionsbefore us What do we mean by empowerment? How different is empowerment from other organizational practices? How do we empower? Can everyone be empowered in the organization? What's the Role of leadership in empowerment exercise, and What empowerment does to everyone…. Individual; Organisational; and the Leaders
  • 8.
    the studies • Pati,1997 • Barnes and Kaftans, • Sengupta and 1970, 1985 Shaikh,1997 • Myron Eichen,1989 • Venkatachalam, • Marjorie Reynolds, 1998 1991 • Dwivedi,1998 • Michael Quarrey, • Mohapatra,1998 1992 • Tripathy,1999 • Cyndy Payne,1993 • Bo Burlingham, 1999
  • 9.
    Reference Brief Description Major Theme/Summary Menon(1999,in press) Psychological approach The empowered state is a psychological state characterized by perceived control. Perceived control, perceived competence goals. Liden&Arad(1996) Power perspective Empowerment research should be subsumed under the rubric of power Spreitzer(1995) Psychological motivational Empowerment is increased intrinsic approach motivation manifested in four cognitions: competence, self – determination and impact. Eylon(1994) Process approach Empowerment is an enhancing and energizing context specific process that expands feelings of trust and control Conger(1989) Leadership approach Empowering subordinates is a major component of leadership Yukl(1989) Transformational Leadership The effect of the transformational approach influence is to empower subordinates to participate in the process of transforming the organization House (1988) Focus on perceived control Empowered employees are those who feel confident and in control of their environments. Block (1986) Focus on employee To feel empowered is to involvement a) feel responsible for one’s actions b) to have a sense of purpose in achieving something worthwhile, and c) to commit to achieving that purpose Burke (1986) Leadership approach Leaders empower subordinates by providing clarity of direction which encompasses a higher purpose or worthy cause Bennis & Nanus(1985) Leadership approach Leaders energies (hence empower) through psychological identification. The critical dimensions of empowerment are significance, 85 best research work competence, community and enjoyment /fun
  • 10.
    work of prominence •Foundation for Enterprise Development – FED, and Beyster Institute for Entrepreneurial Employee Ownership , USA • Argyris, Chris (1998):“Empowerment: The Emperor’s new Clothes”, Harvard Business Review, May-June, pp: 98 -105 • Kantar, R. M , 1977, 1979, 1989,1995 • Lawler, E. E III , 1986, 1988, 1992, 1994, 1995
  • 11.
    Theoretical and Conceptualframework E M POWER M E N T em-pow-er-ment (im-pau [-] r-ment) Oxford English Dictionary says, to empower is “to authorize, to enable” Rosabeth Moss Kanter (1977) Professor at Harvard Business School, Ernest L. Arbuckle Professorship “giving power to people who operate at an advantage in the organization success” Bowen and Lawler (1992) Director, the Centre for Effective Organization, University of Southern California, “ Complete Power to make decisions that influence organizational direction and performance”
  • 12.
    essentially, empowerment … •it liberates people from constraints such as checking with the boss before taking actions • absolute control is given up, allowing everyone make decisions, and can set goals • decision-making authority and responsibility percolates from managers to the employees at the lowest rung • people are given total freedom to do their job, and are trusted, made accountable and responsible
  • 13.
    characteristics of conditions for empowerment empowered organization Power to act shared responsibility Participation at all levels individual accountability Way for innovation flat organizational hierarchy Transparency in organizational activities autonomous work teams Accountability for one’s action high belief and trust Right kind of leadership leadership at all levels Autonomy to work Way to release extra energy climate of collaboration Proper recognition and atmosphere of openness appreciation freedom from all Climate of trust and faith A learning culture
  • 14.
    the phd work WorkersEmpowerment : A Study of Polyhydron Private Limited, Belgaum, Karnataka State, India Established in 1981-82 Address:80, Machhe Industrial Estate,Machhe, Belgaum- 590014. Karnataka State www.polyhydron.com
  • 15.
    research objectives  to understand factors that contribute to empowerment--the systems, practices, policy and the leadership  To understand management practices impacting on employee behavior, thus empowering employees  made to understand all factors that contributed to empowerment--the systems, practices, policy and leadership  An effort was also made to see how these management practices impacted upon employee behavior Supporting Objectives : Do we really need empowered people? Is empowerment something that can be done to some one, or is it something a person must choose? What role does the person in the top have to play in this exercise? With all these objectives, the genesis of empowerment is probed at a macro level.
  • 16.
    hypothesis Ha1 Empowerment is a sense of belonging developed by employee as a result of various coherent organizational practices and practices; Ha2 A good Organizational climate would shape behavior and develop positive attitudes towards organizational growth and development leading to employee empowerment; Ha3 Access to information about the mission, value, goals, and vision of an organization is positively related to empowerment; Ha4 If an organization aspires for fundamental changes while empowering employees, it must change the present way of functioning; and Ha5 Empowerment at the workplace makes leaderless.
  • 17.
  • 18.
    areas of enquiry Accountability/ Bureaucracy / Culture / Leadership/ Management Style and approach / Structure / liberty / Communication / Decision Making / Discipline/ Ethos / Industrial Democracy / Knowledge Sharing / Ownership Culture / Organizational Health / Power Distribution/ Responsibility Sharing / Transparency / Information sharing / Degree of trust & loyalty………. total of 75 areas
  • 19.
    data collection The formatof Data collection from Employees Pre Pilot Observation Observed the Pooling all the System responses Questionnaire Discussion with CEO Administered Case-by- Case discussion
  • 20.
    The format ofData collection from CEO / MD Observed the Pooling all system responses in presence of all Discussion Back to with CEO CEO System/ Case by case • An in-formal observation over a period Practices discussion interface • Discussion with CEO at one-one level • The opinions of CEO and system interfaced All the collected data of CEO through opinions were observed, verified case by case with each employees • The opinions / views of employees were put back to CEO / MD for discussion, and • Open House
  • 21.
    Agenda 02 what we saw at ppl • Estd 1981-82 • Conventional way of Management 1982-1988 • Visit to SEMCO, Sau Paulo, Brazil 1988 • Changed People practices 1988-1996 • Empowered People practices 1996 onwards
  • 22.
    empowerment@workplace •The HR practices •TheCulture •The Leadership, and the •The Traits
  • 23.
    changed workplace empowerment@work: themaking of an empowered workforce Conventional Present Do what is told Do what is required Liberty misused Liberty made use to fullest extent Not my job attitude Its everyone's job Commitment level low High commitment Boundary defined No Boundary Lack of scope for improvement High scope for improvement Various committees / councils Never a designated committee Trust level low Trust is core Supervised work No Supervision Freedom restricted More freedom / liberty Closed behavior Transparent behavior Apply for leave / off Decide on leave / off
  • 24.
    the culture •Value given to Human beings •Each is accountable / responsible for his actions and can’t blame others the hr practices •All information is open and shared Complete Freedom Total Transparency •Each is boss in himself Complete Shared Responsibility •Common rooms are shared Accountability for ones actions Liberty to decide course of •Suggestions are given regularly and open actions Involvement / Participation •Management is open to ideas and more Transparent feedback information sharing Delegated authority •Every one can have own No hidden Agenda objectives, mission, and goals; Complete Autonomy Power to take decisions •No Security or guard
  • 25.
    employee traits Open and Transparent Positive Approach No defined mind set Free from Bias leadership No scapegoat attitude Freedom to do work in one’s own way High Commitment No Supervision/ Foreman Disciplined No Bureaucratic and Administrative interference Trustworthy No Red-tapism Enjoys the work Sharing Common Platform Loyal and Truthful Trusting each persons actions Work that extra mile No restrictions for new inventions One can fail, no punishment Suggestions are part of daily work Accepts critics Open House
  • 26.
    ceo’s reactions • you have done a mistake and let us all look at it; • my door is always open for discussions; • let us all discuss on your idea; • how to solve your problem…. your problem is our problem; • any ideas from your side to contribute; • you are the boss of the organization; • I look for everyone in joining hands with me; • you have done a good work, let us all learn lessons from you; • let me join you in helping you; • please teach me the new techniques that you have learnt; • let me announce your achievements to others; • You will arrange a programme for sharing your successful story,
  • 27.
    language@workplace My door isopen to you Let us all discuss on the idea Your problem / issue is our concern Let us join hands together Kindly teach me the new technique Let us all announce your achievement
  • 28.
    outcome of suchpractices • Engagement with Organsiation • Product Innovation • Profits and Income Scaled • Turnover and loyalty • Reputation and Customers • Market Standing • NO IR issues • Employer BRANDING
  • 29.
    drawbacks • Why power to me • Is it the game plan of management • Its not my job to have power • Its not my job to decide • I am not the right person to have power • My me as leader and decision maker
  • 30.
    the impressions Adi Godrej, Chairmanand MD, Godrej Soaps ltd,1992 “It has opened my eyes in best people management practices” Ricardo F Semler, Chairman, SEMCO, Brazil, 1994 “I have seen an exceptionally empowerment practiced at workplace” Sri Sharadrao Pawar, Ex-CM, present Cabinet Minister, GOI,1997 “Congrats for good work done in people management strategies”
  • 31.
    Agenda 03 Ideas for practices: lessons to learn •First ‘No’ RULE Don’t hold unto data •Platform for Empowerment / Informal Relations create conditions for Create Opportunity empowerment Desired Future •Prioritise the area Education the gains •Attitudinal Surveys Time to empower or not to •Accountability empower •Define the Purpose Can’t empower areas •Open Door Policy and Don’t impose empowerment Transparency Power of Empowerment •Ownership Culture Fun at workplace
  • 32.
    academic discussion • OB advantage corporate • HR practices • HRM / SHRM • CEO • Leadership • HR Chief • Organizational Change • Chief Peoples Officer • Restructuring / OD • Dean and Directors of • Sociology of Culture MBA • Change Management • MDP’s
  • 33.
    At Prestige Institute Coursesin OB/ HR Basics in Management Leadership Group Dynamics
  • 34.
    future research Compare empowermentwith less / no empowerment organisation Compare empowerment strategies amongst male and female Compare with Public X Private sector company Compare with Small x Medium X Large Retired / leftover employees survey or opinion can also be had
  • 35.
    thank you sanbag@rediffmail.com /sanbagsanbag@rediffmail.com
  • 36.
    About PhD • AtMBA dept, Karnatak University, Dharwad, Karnataka State / A 5 Star NACC graded • Dr. A H Chachadi, Professor, Guide • Evaluated by XLRI and IIM-K Professors • Between 2000-2008 work undertaken • 299 pages total • 311 references • Awarded on 16th March, 2008
  • 37.
    Endorsement on theWork XLRI Editor, when published in XLRI-Management and Labour Studies Journal The article printed below is a truly extraordinary example of employee empowerment. The methods followed by the organisation studied would be considered revolutionary anywhere in the world and even more so in India. Infact, one sometimes wonders how the whole effort did not end in chaos. The company has apparently succeeded in developing a work force and a leadership almost devoid of the foibles of most other humans. (Printed on the Article XLRI-Management and Labour Studies, 26,2,April, 2001, pp.109-119) Executive Director, Indian Journal of Training and Development, ISTD, India The article published in the area of Empowerment in ISTD has been adjudged as the Best Paper published during the year-2001. Kindly accept our Heartiest Congratulations. (22July, 2002 / Through Personal Letter)
  • 38.
    Yoon, Jeong, Professor of ob and hr, AJOU university, South Korea Yoon, Jeong (2001).“The role of structure and motivation for workplace empowerment: The case of Korean employees”, Social Psychology Quarterly, 64 (2); pp. 195 – 206
  • 39.
    Presentation to SeniorHR Managers, of SHRI on Empowerment, part of present work 2003, September
  • 40.
    Polyhydron Mission We willnurture an Ethically Managed Organisation. We will not exploit our Customer, Employees, Suppliers, Government, Soci ety and Nature Polyhydron Vision We will create an island of Excellence through focus on Customer, Employee Empowerment and continuous improvement.
  • 41.
  • 42.
    Harvard Business Review HBR, July-August, 2010, p:57 When workers are made to feel empowered, the whole organization wins Roger L MARTIN, Dean, Rotman School of Management University of Toronto, Canada