SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
TO: Christopher Thacker, Managing Partner
Towson Cornerstone Group
FROM: Jacob Mitchell, Junior Analyst
Towson Cornerstone Group
DATE: September 12, 2016
SUBJECT: Apple is in Great Financial Standing
As requested, I have conducted a comparative financial analysis between Apple
and its top competitor. The results show Apple currently in a great financial
position. In order to make this conclusion, I first, determined that Microsoft is
Apple's top competitor. Then, I took a set of five indices and compared each
company to industry standards. I found that Apple is doing notably well in the
areas of net income growth and earnings per share.
Five Indices Show Apple Ahead
Apple looks great in comparison when looking at all five indices. Table 1 shows
each standard and the companies current condition.
Index Standard Apple Microsoft
NET INCOME Percent Growth 27.94% -(23.17%)
EPS Industry Average: $5.71 $8.56 $2.05
P/E RATIO Industry Average: 20.36 12.85 28.10
QUICK RATIO Greater than 1 1.08 2.31
STOCK PRICE Target: AAPL$120 MSFT$61 intra $107.70
6mo $100.63
1yr $104.31
$57.61
$52.63
$54.99
NOTE: Data regarding industry standards was obtained from NASDAQ.com, the
largest stock exchange association in the world (NASDAQ,2016a, p1) (NASDAQ,
2016b, p.1).
Apple has high net income growth. Table 1 shows that Apple's net income
growth rate us 27.94%, which exceeds the standard (NASDAQ, 2016a, p.1).
Apple's net income for Q3 9 months ended is $36.67BIL ("Apple Reports...",
2016). Microsoft is experiencing regression in their net income, with numbers
going down 23.17% (NASDAQ, 2016b, p.1). This is the result of the new CEO,
Tim Cook, who has boosted revenues 101% since taking over in 2011 (Graham,
2016, para 4).
Apple has high EPS. Table 1 shows that Apples earnings per share is $8.56,
which exceeds the standard (NASDAQ, 2016a, p.1). This means that the company
is currently very profitable to investors. Apple's EPS is four times higher than
Microsoft, who has an EPS of only 2.05 which falls well below industry standards
(NASDAQ, 2016b, p.1). This is most likely due to the increase in use of Apple
products by mainstream consumers (Rogers, 2016, para 2)
BCE MEMORANDUM
Apple has a good P/E. Apple's price to earnings ratio is 12.85 (NASDAQ,
2016a, p.1). The P/E ratio for Apple is much lower than both Microsoft and the
Industry Average. This makes Apple an attractive stock because a lower P/E
shows better performance (Frenette, 2016, para 2). In contrast, Microsoft's P/E is
more than double than Apple's and is higher than the industry average. This could
be due to the fact that Microsoft was more popular in the 90's and Apple is more
popular now.
Both companies have good quick ratio. Apples quick ratio is only 1.08,
which exceeds that standard of 1 (NASDAQ, 2016a, p.1). It is possible that
Apple's quick ratio is low due to the fact that they are releasing a new product this
quarter, which require much research and development (Rogers, 2016, para 4). The
quick ratios show that both companies are able to liquidate their assets and come
away with a profit. This is due to the fact that the ratio is greater than one so both
companies are in good standing ("Quick Ratio", 2016).
Both companies fall short with stock price. The stock prices for both
companies are coming up short of their targets. Apple is seeing a slow in revenue
growth; for example, this past year was the first time in 13 years that total revenue
fell below the consensus projection (Rogers, 2016, para 4). This could be due to
the fact that they did not release a new iPhone model in the past year, which is
their top seller.
Two Very Similar Companies
The Microsoft was chosen due to the fact that each company sells products in the
technology industry. Comparable products include computers, laptops, operating
systems, word processors, various software, "cloud" storage, cell phones, and other
electronic devices.
Let's Discuss Apple's Great Financial Standing
After looking into all five indices and comparing them to Apple's top competitor, it
is clear that they are doing very well financially. If you have any questions please
do not hesitate to call me at (443) 243-4553 or email me at
jmitch22@students.towson.edu. I look forward to hearing back from you and
discussing Apple's impressive financial position.
References
Apple Reports Third Quarter Results. (2016, July 26). Retrieved from
http://www.apple.com/newsroom/2016/07/apple-reports-third-
quarter-results.html
Frenette, J. (2016, August 18). Why Apple, Inc. IPhone Growth Will Pick
Up Again? Retrieved September 12, 2016, from
http://amigobulls.com/articles/why-apple-inc-iphone-growth-will-
pick-up-again
Graham, J. (2016, August 24). Tim Cook at 5 years: More Profits, Less
Innovation. USA Today, Tech, p. 1. Retrieved from
http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2016/08/24/tim-cook-5-years-
more-profits-less-innovation/89206978/
Kenny, B. (Producer). (2016, September 1). Behind the Apple Tax
Situation, an Unprecedented Financial Policy. HBS cold call.
Podcast retrieved from http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/behind-the-apple-
tax-situation-an-unprecedented-financial-policy
NASDAQ (2016a, September 9). Retrieved September 12, 2016, from
http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/aapl/financials?query=income-
statement
NASDAQ (2016b, September 9). Retrieved September 12, 2016, from
http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/msft/financials
Quick ratio. (n.d.). Retrieved September 12, 2016, from
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/q/quickratio.asp
Rogers, A. (2016, July 14). Your analyst forecast for apple's fiscal 3Q2016.
Retrieved September 12, 2016, from
http://marketrealist.com/2016/07/analysts-expect-apples-fiscal-
3q16-earnings/

More Related Content

Similar to Mitchell_Jacob_REVISEDEvaluationMemo

Writing Sample - Equity Research - AAPL
Writing Sample - Equity Research - AAPLWriting Sample - Equity Research - AAPL
Writing Sample - Equity Research - AAPL
Michael Lin
 
Running head TEAM PAPER TEAM PAPER-A competitive analysis.docx
Running head TEAM PAPER TEAM PAPER-A competitive analysis.docxRunning head TEAM PAPER TEAM PAPER-A competitive analysis.docx
Running head TEAM PAPER TEAM PAPER-A competitive analysis.docx
agnesdcarey33086
 
Apple strategic analysis
Apple strategic analysisApple strategic analysis
Apple strategic analysis
essayassignmentwriting
 
Running head APPLE ENVIRONMENTSL SCAN .docx
Running head APPLE ENVIRONMENTSL SCAN                            .docxRunning head APPLE ENVIRONMENTSL SCAN                            .docx
Running head APPLE ENVIRONMENTSL SCAN .docx
SUBHI7
 
Running head EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT SCAN—APPLE .docx
Running head  EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT SCAN—APPLE                    .docxRunning head  EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT SCAN—APPLE                    .docx
Running head EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT SCAN—APPLE .docx
joellemurphey
 
WAL_SOCW6121_01_A_EN-CC.mp4Make sure to read the instruction.docx
WAL_SOCW6121_01_A_EN-CC.mp4Make sure to read the instruction.docxWAL_SOCW6121_01_A_EN-CC.mp4Make sure to read the instruction.docx
WAL_SOCW6121_01_A_EN-CC.mp4Make sure to read the instruction.docx
jessiehampson
 
14Cumulative Strategic Plan and Leadership Analysis
14Cumulative Strategic Plan and Leadership Analysis14Cumulative Strategic Plan and Leadership Analysis
14Cumulative Strategic Plan and Leadership Analysis
MatthewTennant613
 
14Cumulative Strategic Plan and Leadership Analysis
14Cumulative Strategic Plan and Leadership Analysis14Cumulative Strategic Plan and Leadership Analysis
14Cumulative Strategic Plan and Leadership Analysis
AnastaciaShadelb
 
Capstone Paper 1 Apple
Capstone Paper 1 AppleCapstone Paper 1 Apple
Capstone Paper 1 Apple
Adam Mellott
 
Running Head Apple CompanyApple Company.docx
Running Head Apple CompanyApple Company.docxRunning Head Apple CompanyApple Company.docx
Running Head Apple CompanyApple Company.docx
SUBHI7
 
Quadrant Strategic Objective Measure Target for YearFinanc.docx
Quadrant Strategic Objective Measure Target for YearFinanc.docxQuadrant Strategic Objective Measure Target for YearFinanc.docx
Quadrant Strategic Objective Measure Target for YearFinanc.docx
makdul
 
Stacey troup week 3 current market conditions competitive analysis
Stacey troup week 3 current market conditions competitive analysisStacey troup week 3 current market conditions competitive analysis
Stacey troup week 3 current market conditions competitive analysis
Stacey Troup
 

Similar to Mitchell_Jacob_REVISEDEvaluationMemo (20)

Writing Sample - Equity Research - AAPL
Writing Sample - Equity Research - AAPLWriting Sample - Equity Research - AAPL
Writing Sample - Equity Research - AAPL
 
Running head TEAM PAPER TEAM PAPER-A competitive analysis.docx
Running head TEAM PAPER TEAM PAPER-A competitive analysis.docxRunning head TEAM PAPER TEAM PAPER-A competitive analysis.docx
Running head TEAM PAPER TEAM PAPER-A competitive analysis.docx
 
Market Analysis Report
Market Analysis ReportMarket Analysis Report
Market Analysis Report
 
Apple strategic analysis
Apple strategic analysisApple strategic analysis
Apple strategic analysis
 
Running head APPLE ENVIRONMENTSL SCAN .docx
Running head APPLE ENVIRONMENTSL SCAN                            .docxRunning head APPLE ENVIRONMENTSL SCAN                            .docx
Running head APPLE ENVIRONMENTSL SCAN .docx
 
Apple strategic analysis
Apple strategic analysisApple strategic analysis
Apple strategic analysis
 
Running head EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT SCAN—APPLE .docx
Running head  EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT SCAN—APPLE                    .docxRunning head  EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT SCAN—APPLE                    .docx
Running head EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT SCAN—APPLE .docx
 
Financial Ratio Comparison - Apple and HP (2011 Figures)
Financial Ratio Comparison - Apple and HP (2011 Figures)Financial Ratio Comparison - Apple and HP (2011 Figures)
Financial Ratio Comparison - Apple and HP (2011 Figures)
 
WAL_SOCW6121_01_A_EN-CC.mp4Make sure to read the instruction.docx
WAL_SOCW6121_01_A_EN-CC.mp4Make sure to read the instruction.docxWAL_SOCW6121_01_A_EN-CC.mp4Make sure to read the instruction.docx
WAL_SOCW6121_01_A_EN-CC.mp4Make sure to read the instruction.docx
 
14Cumulative Strategic Plan and Leadership Analysis
14Cumulative Strategic Plan and Leadership Analysis14Cumulative Strategic Plan and Leadership Analysis
14Cumulative Strategic Plan and Leadership Analysis
 
14Cumulative Strategic Plan and Leadership Analysis
14Cumulative Strategic Plan and Leadership Analysis14Cumulative Strategic Plan and Leadership Analysis
14Cumulative Strategic Plan and Leadership Analysis
 
Apple
AppleApple
Apple
 
Apple swot analysis 2016 (FREE)
Apple swot analysis 2016 (FREE)Apple swot analysis 2016 (FREE)
Apple swot analysis 2016 (FREE)
 
Capstone Paper 1 Apple
Capstone Paper 1 AppleCapstone Paper 1 Apple
Capstone Paper 1 Apple
 
Running Head Apple CompanyApple Company.docx
Running Head Apple CompanyApple Company.docxRunning Head Apple CompanyApple Company.docx
Running Head Apple CompanyApple Company.docx
 
Quadrant Strategic Objective Measure Target for YearFinanc.docx
Quadrant Strategic Objective Measure Target for YearFinanc.docxQuadrant Strategic Objective Measure Target for YearFinanc.docx
Quadrant Strategic Objective Measure Target for YearFinanc.docx
 
EB Presentation.pptx
EB Presentation.pptxEB Presentation.pptx
EB Presentation.pptx
 
Stacey troup week 3 current market conditions competitive analysis
Stacey troup week 3 current market conditions competitive analysisStacey troup week 3 current market conditions competitive analysis
Stacey troup week 3 current market conditions competitive analysis
 
Apple Company Review, February 2017 from OLMA NEXT Ltd.
Apple Company Review, February 2017 from OLMA NEXT Ltd.Apple Company Review, February 2017 from OLMA NEXT Ltd.
Apple Company Review, February 2017 from OLMA NEXT Ltd.
 
TECH_AAPL_03.09.15
TECH_AAPL_03.09.15TECH_AAPL_03.09.15
TECH_AAPL_03.09.15
 

Mitchell_Jacob_REVISEDEvaluationMemo

  • 1. TO: Christopher Thacker, Managing Partner Towson Cornerstone Group FROM: Jacob Mitchell, Junior Analyst Towson Cornerstone Group DATE: September 12, 2016 SUBJECT: Apple is in Great Financial Standing As requested, I have conducted a comparative financial analysis between Apple and its top competitor. The results show Apple currently in a great financial position. In order to make this conclusion, I first, determined that Microsoft is Apple's top competitor. Then, I took a set of five indices and compared each company to industry standards. I found that Apple is doing notably well in the areas of net income growth and earnings per share. Five Indices Show Apple Ahead Apple looks great in comparison when looking at all five indices. Table 1 shows each standard and the companies current condition. Index Standard Apple Microsoft NET INCOME Percent Growth 27.94% -(23.17%) EPS Industry Average: $5.71 $8.56 $2.05 P/E RATIO Industry Average: 20.36 12.85 28.10 QUICK RATIO Greater than 1 1.08 2.31 STOCK PRICE Target: AAPL$120 MSFT$61 intra $107.70 6mo $100.63 1yr $104.31 $57.61 $52.63 $54.99 NOTE: Data regarding industry standards was obtained from NASDAQ.com, the largest stock exchange association in the world (NASDAQ,2016a, p1) (NASDAQ, 2016b, p.1). Apple has high net income growth. Table 1 shows that Apple's net income growth rate us 27.94%, which exceeds the standard (NASDAQ, 2016a, p.1). Apple's net income for Q3 9 months ended is $36.67BIL ("Apple Reports...", 2016). Microsoft is experiencing regression in their net income, with numbers going down 23.17% (NASDAQ, 2016b, p.1). This is the result of the new CEO, Tim Cook, who has boosted revenues 101% since taking over in 2011 (Graham, 2016, para 4). Apple has high EPS. Table 1 shows that Apples earnings per share is $8.56, which exceeds the standard (NASDAQ, 2016a, p.1). This means that the company is currently very profitable to investors. Apple's EPS is four times higher than Microsoft, who has an EPS of only 2.05 which falls well below industry standards (NASDAQ, 2016b, p.1). This is most likely due to the increase in use of Apple products by mainstream consumers (Rogers, 2016, para 2) BCE MEMORANDUM
  • 2. Apple has a good P/E. Apple's price to earnings ratio is 12.85 (NASDAQ, 2016a, p.1). The P/E ratio for Apple is much lower than both Microsoft and the Industry Average. This makes Apple an attractive stock because a lower P/E shows better performance (Frenette, 2016, para 2). In contrast, Microsoft's P/E is more than double than Apple's and is higher than the industry average. This could be due to the fact that Microsoft was more popular in the 90's and Apple is more popular now. Both companies have good quick ratio. Apples quick ratio is only 1.08, which exceeds that standard of 1 (NASDAQ, 2016a, p.1). It is possible that Apple's quick ratio is low due to the fact that they are releasing a new product this quarter, which require much research and development (Rogers, 2016, para 4). The quick ratios show that both companies are able to liquidate their assets and come away with a profit. This is due to the fact that the ratio is greater than one so both companies are in good standing ("Quick Ratio", 2016). Both companies fall short with stock price. The stock prices for both companies are coming up short of their targets. Apple is seeing a slow in revenue growth; for example, this past year was the first time in 13 years that total revenue fell below the consensus projection (Rogers, 2016, para 4). This could be due to the fact that they did not release a new iPhone model in the past year, which is their top seller. Two Very Similar Companies The Microsoft was chosen due to the fact that each company sells products in the technology industry. Comparable products include computers, laptops, operating systems, word processors, various software, "cloud" storage, cell phones, and other electronic devices. Let's Discuss Apple's Great Financial Standing After looking into all five indices and comparing them to Apple's top competitor, it is clear that they are doing very well financially. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call me at (443) 243-4553 or email me at jmitch22@students.towson.edu. I look forward to hearing back from you and discussing Apple's impressive financial position. References
  • 3. Apple Reports Third Quarter Results. (2016, July 26). Retrieved from http://www.apple.com/newsroom/2016/07/apple-reports-third- quarter-results.html Frenette, J. (2016, August 18). Why Apple, Inc. IPhone Growth Will Pick Up Again? Retrieved September 12, 2016, from http://amigobulls.com/articles/why-apple-inc-iphone-growth-will- pick-up-again Graham, J. (2016, August 24). Tim Cook at 5 years: More Profits, Less Innovation. USA Today, Tech, p. 1. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2016/08/24/tim-cook-5-years- more-profits-less-innovation/89206978/ Kenny, B. (Producer). (2016, September 1). Behind the Apple Tax Situation, an Unprecedented Financial Policy. HBS cold call. Podcast retrieved from http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/behind-the-apple- tax-situation-an-unprecedented-financial-policy NASDAQ (2016a, September 9). Retrieved September 12, 2016, from http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/aapl/financials?query=income- statement NASDAQ (2016b, September 9). Retrieved September 12, 2016, from http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/msft/financials Quick ratio. (n.d.). Retrieved September 12, 2016, from http://www.investopedia.com/terms/q/quickratio.asp
  • 4. Rogers, A. (2016, July 14). Your analyst forecast for apple's fiscal 3Q2016. Retrieved September 12, 2016, from http://marketrealist.com/2016/07/analysts-expect-apples-fiscal- 3q16-earnings/