Medicaid was established in 1965 under President Lyndon B. Johnson as a federal-state program to provide health coverage for low-income individuals and families. It has since expanded coverage to additional groups like children, pregnant women, the disabled, and the elderly. States administer their own Medicaid programs within federal minimum guidelines for eligibility and covered services. Both the federal and state governments jointly fund Medicaid, with the federal contribution varying by state based on per capita income. Over time, Medicaid has grown to cover over 60 million Americans and account for a significant portion of state budgets.
Assessing U.S. and International Experience with Health Reform and Implications for the Future by W. David Helms, Ph.D, President and CEO, Academy Health
Assessing U.S. and International Experience with Health Reform and Implications for the Future by W. David Helms, Ph.D, President and CEO, Academy Health
Observations on the needs for, the contents of, and many of the practical effects of the Affordable care Act or Obamacare. Understanding its benefits and shortcomings
While the health care reform bill is a step in the right direction, medicare for all or single payer is what is really needed to control costs and insure all.
The Affordable Care Act fundamentally changed the landscape of the U.S. health care system. With more than five years since the law’s passage, questions remain about how to fix a system that remains broken despite recent reform efforts. Did the Affordable Care Act adequately reform a failing health system, or did that prescription only treat the symptoms of a much larger illness?
Shocking study in JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION of 1.4 billion person-years documenting rising death rates among middle aged whites, amounting to over 600,000 lives lost due to alcoholism, drug overdoses and suicides
This is a training to introduce audiences to the problems with the health care system in Massachusetts, and to describe how a single payer health care system controls costs and saves lives elsewhere in the world.
A fact based, detailed analysis of the economic stress on middle American families and the malfunction of democratic institutions, producing distrust, anger, and an epidemic of unnecessary deaths. Explains the dynamics of the 2016 Presidential election.
Observations on the needs for, the contents of, and many of the practical effects of the Affordable care Act or Obamacare. Understanding its benefits and shortcomings
While the health care reform bill is a step in the right direction, medicare for all or single payer is what is really needed to control costs and insure all.
The Affordable Care Act fundamentally changed the landscape of the U.S. health care system. With more than five years since the law’s passage, questions remain about how to fix a system that remains broken despite recent reform efforts. Did the Affordable Care Act adequately reform a failing health system, or did that prescription only treat the symptoms of a much larger illness?
Shocking study in JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION of 1.4 billion person-years documenting rising death rates among middle aged whites, amounting to over 600,000 lives lost due to alcoholism, drug overdoses and suicides
This is a training to introduce audiences to the problems with the health care system in Massachusetts, and to describe how a single payer health care system controls costs and saves lives elsewhere in the world.
A fact based, detailed analysis of the economic stress on middle American families and the malfunction of democratic institutions, producing distrust, anger, and an epidemic of unnecessary deaths. Explains the dynamics of the 2016 Presidential election.
Flux trading is a financial analytics company that creates algorithms to trade on the stock exchange. Our program iteratively capitalizes on self-correcting market anomalies to generate stable portfolio returns. Unlike other firms, we rely on machine learning and big data to generate consistent returns.
In guest mode supported devices are Laptop, windows,Mac, IOS, and linux and for internet connectivity LAN to the Prijector device and Go to settings>Ethernet>Turn On>Ethernet. or you can connect your laptop to Prijector WiFi HotSpot
This presentation helps managers develop coaching strategies that bring out the best in their employees, by understanding the psychological needs that people bring to the workplace.
Medicare or Medicaid – which has greater impact in Florida Abov.docxjessiehampson
Medicare or Medicaid – which has greater impact in Florida?
Above is the answer of 2 peer. I need a response for them
PEER 1
Medicare and Medicaid are the greatest insurance programs run by the government. However, they are operated and funded by different parts of the government and primarily serve different groups. Medicare is run by the federal government and mainly provide health coverage to individual aged 65 years and above and those with disability. Medicaid entails collaboration between the state and federal government and provides health coverage to low-income. However, there are those how meet dual eligible criteria. Therefore, as a state and federal-run program Medicaid has greater effects on state governments. State governments co-fund the program and are expected to match federal funding.
From modest beginnings in 1965, Medicaid has grown significantly from $5.3 billion four decades ago, to $449 billion in 2013. In Florida, Medicaid expenditures have grown by 33% between 2012 and 2016. In 2016, the combined state and federal spending on Medicaid increased by 22%. Over these years, the federal government has provided between 55% and 60% of Medicaid funding. During the same time, Medicaid has growth to more than 75% of the Medicare expenditure and its share of national health expenditure has almost doubled. Following the passage of the Affordable Care Act, 2010, states were requested to expand their Medicaid program (Sutter, 2016). According to Ward (2020), the expansion of the Medicaid program has met significant resistant because of its presumed impact on state budgets. Florida is one of the states that have failed to expand its Medicaid plan under the Affordable Care Act. Some stakeholders argue that expanding the illegibility criteria is likely to have significant fiscal implications. Florida is among the states with the highest personal healthcare spending, ranking 5th nationwide. According to Buettgens (2018), the growing Medicaid expenditure are not necessarily driven by increased coverage, but also by changing medical needs, changes in demographics, and other factors affecting consumption of health care services. The debate on the cost implications of expanding Medicaid are likely to persist, but is evident that more Americans have health insurance.
PEER2
More often individuals tend not to understand the difference between Medicare in addition to Medicaid. Regardless of them providing assistance to the senior citizens as well as the disabled ones in catering for most of the expenses that are health-related. Medicare is basically a type of health insurance for the people who are disabled, senior or anyone who is known to be suffering from a failure of the kidney which is considered to be permanent. Additionally, it is financed via the contributions of tax security which is contrary to the Medicaid (Hu and Mortensen, 2018).
Florida Medicaid is basically a program that depends on the necessities with benefits whic.
Report IIShawnette Jones MHA507Rea Burleson .docxaudeleypearl
Report II
Shawnette Jones
MHA/507
Rea Burleson
University of Phoenix
10/06/2019
Since the location of the highest widespread virus outbreaks have been recognized, it is important to know now what age group is mostly affected by the virus. Documenting these given age groups shall assist to determine the kinds of resources which shall be necessary at these locations to correctly treat these patients.
Age Groups Most Affected
Following the World Health Organization (2019) show that children, pregnant women and adults are particularly the ones who are vulnerable and take a relatively biggest share of the diseases load. The analysis of the given information, show that the progression of the age group most affected starting with the highest are under 18,61 and over 31-60 and finally 19-30 that correspond to the research of the World Health Organization on most vulnerable groups of individuals.
Age Groups Least Affected
The age groups least affected are the 19-30 years old in addition to those under 31- 60 years old. Generally, this kind of group comprises of the young adults as well as individuals in their middle ages. The reason why this group is probably least affected is due to the fact that this age brackets the body immune system is possibly more strong in preventing and fighting infections thus making the individual much healthier (Lesourd & Meaume, 1994).
Bar Graph Showing Ages Affected
Chart Evaluation
The bar graph above illustrates that the least age groups affected are ones between 19 to 30 years old. According to Morse (2001) explain that the observed age outlines can impact after intolerance diagnosing, identifying as well as cases recording, changes in exposure as well as variances invulnerability to the virus. Therefore by determining if change with age is contingent on exposure or vulnerability requires an evaluation of exposures in individual with and without the illness. Individual influences results to virus occurrences that can be recognized in nearly all incidents.
Prevalence Rates
The prevalence rate for this disease changes among the diverse age groups in every city. According to United States Census Bureau (2017) explanation the current population of the United States of America is 325,365,189 as of December 18, 2017. Therefore to determine the prevalence rate per 100,000 for this disease equals, the number of infection in the particular age group divided by the United States population, then multiplied by 100,000.
The following chart shows the prevalence rate for each age group in each of the top five cities affected by this disease.
City
<18 Prevalence Rate
19-30 Prevalence Rate
31-60 Prevalence Rate
61+ Prevalence Rate
Jacksonville
0.02858
0.00584
0.01875
0.04579
Miami
0.05225
0.00553
0.00922
0.02490
Phoenix
0.04457
0.00615
0.00984
0.02828
Austin
0.04641
0.00369
0.01199
0.02428
Houston
0.03012
0.00492
0.01598
0.03258
Conclusion
Finally, the study of age groups that are mainly affected and vulnera ...
Running head THE DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR MEDICAID .docxtoltonkendal
Running head: THE DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR MEDICAID 1
THE DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR MEDICAID 6
The Determination of Eligibility for Medicaid
Tiffany Williams
The Determination of Eligibility for Medicaid
Introduction
The social health care program, Medicaid is aimed at providing health care services to the needy and those with disabilities in the United States. The Act should provide the state with the way forward or criteria to be followed in selecting the people who are to benefit from the social health program. However, over time, it has not been clear to every American citizen as to which criteria should be used in determining the needy in the society. In particular, it has been challenging on selecting the eligible citizens for the program with a focus on the level of income and the level of expenditure. For instance, the issue of “spend down” periods has posed a lot of difficulties in determining the eligibility for Medicaid. A way great issue regarding the funding, expansion, and determination of eligibility for Medicaid includes the requirement by the Supreme Court in the United States for regions such as Massachusetts to contribute the six months’ excess income towards medical expenditure before the Medicaid coverage program begins in such regions. This paper seeks to explain the issue of Medicaid coverage and the eligibility of the different level of community members. It also explores the level of government affected by the issue as well as the analysis of the eligibility of Medicaid.
Economic Issue
The social health program (Medicaid) requires adequate funding in order to cover effectively a large and needy population. While it would be more beneficial to expand the program to the other categories of people in the society such as those with disabilities, there should be constant and enough supply of funds both from the government and the good wishers such as donors to help reach out every needy member of the society. Inadequate funding is an issue since there is a large percentage of people who need medical assistance and cannot afford it unless they get subsidized medical health care or fully assisted by programs such as the Medicaid (Ford, Spicer, & Institute of Medicine (U.S.), 2012).
Coupled with the low income of most of the society members, it is clear and evident enough that the majority of the people in the United States value social programs such as Medicaid. However, failure to adequately fund the program has only led to development and implementation of strict procedures and regulations in determining those who are eligible for the program. In particular, the six-month spend down period has resulted in more complex procedures, some of which are neither clear nor understandable to society members. The methodology used has never been friendly to the low-income people; the approach involving spend down for ...
Essay about Health Care Reform
Healthcare reform Essay
Health Care Reform Essay
Health Care Reform Essay
Health Care Reform Essay
Essay On Health Care Reform
The On Health Care Reform
Health Care Reform
Healthcare in the United States Essay
Essay Health Care Reform
3. History of Medicaid
President Lyndon B. Johnson passed Medicaid and Medicare into law in 1965
at the Truman Library in Independence, Missouri. Title XIX of the Social Security
Act, Medicaid is a federal and state entitlement program that pays for medical care
for a certain group of people that have limited resources and would not be able to
pay for their own medical care or insurance. This expanded and replaced the Kerr-
Mills Act of 1960. (Kaiser) In the 1970’s expansions were made to help cover the
disabled and the elderly. By 1972, all of the states in America had a Medicaid plan
with the only exception being Arizona; they would start their plan ten years later in
1982. In the 1980’s Medicaid was expanded to provide more assistance to pregnant
women and infants who were not ‘poor’ enough by the previous eligibility
requirements in an effort to improve infant mortality and health. (Yazici and
4. Kaestner, 1998) In this paper we will look very closely at these specific populations.
In Section 3 we will look at how Medicaid impacts specific populations. We
will examine the impact of SCHIP on low-income children in terms of increased
access, quality, and how SCHIP has impacted private insurance. We will also discuss
Medicaid's impact on the elderly through its coverage of long-term nursing home
care, and how Medicaid impacts nursing home access and quality. The Balanced
Budget Act of 1997 started the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, which
was for low-income children who would fall through the cracks of regular Medicaid
eligibility.
In Section 2 we will look at the other populations affected by
Medicaid. When talking about Medicaid you must talk about the effects on both the
people participating in the program and the physicians and hospitals that are
providing care for these people.
Medicaid currently covers about 1/6 of the nation’s population or 66.4
million people in 2010. (Kaiser) In 2005 state governments spent a combined 315
billion dollars on Medicaid, which was almost 21% of total spending by state
governments. In Section 1 this paper will look at the basic overview of the structure
of Medicaid such as eligibility, enrollment, financing, services, and cost sharing.
Medicaid is a very prevalent topic in modern society with many political
arguments and expansions going on about it. The Affordable Care Act will change
the effect and the structure of Medicaid greatly. In Section 4 of this paper will take a
look at the reforms and expansions going on as we speak.
5. Medicaid Eligibility and Enrollment
Medicaid programs are run by the individual states but are subsidized by the
federal government. Eligibility for Medicaid varies between states, usually by a
multiplier of the federal poverty level that is determined based on every state’s
characteristics along with some federal minimum requirements that every state
must follow. These percentages of poverty level also change for different age groups
within the state. For example, a state could set its multiplier at 300% of the federal
poverty level for older adults and have a rate of 150% for infants.
There have been many changes to the mandatory eligible groups since
Medicaid was established. Every individual who is eligible for Supplemental
security income is eligible for Medicaid as are children younger than 19 whose
family income is less than the federal poverty level, along with a few other select
groups. Most states, however, are more generous with their eligibility requirements
for Medicaid. Some states have set the percentage all the way up to 300% of the
federal poverty level, with the lowest percentage being 133%, which is still above
the federal minimum requirement for Medicaid.
The Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 expanded the eligibility for less poor
pregnant women in an effort to improve infant health. (Yazici and Kaestner, 1998)
This act made it a requirement for children under the age of five from AFDC eligible
families to be covered by a Medicaid program. The AFDC stands for Aid to Families
with Dependent Children, which is another federal and state program providing
financial assistance to these families. The individual states determine who is eligible
6. for AFDC, with the federal government providing an average of 55% of the funding
for this program. (Census Bureau) The Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 also provided
medical coverage for first time pregnant women in AFDC families and pregnant
women in households with two unemployed parents.(Kaiser) It is because of these
new eligibility requirements that Medicaid accounts for the care of about 40%
percent of all pregnancies in the United States and provides insurance for about
30% percent of all children in the country, Figure 1.1.
(Dave,Decker,Kaestner,Simon,2008)
Figure 1.1
In 2003 Medicaid covered nearly 43% of the poor non-elderly in the United
States. The Medicaid expansions in the 1980’s did have an effect on the overall
health of children in the United States since between 1980 and 2000, the infant
mortality rate for white and black infants had a steady decline.
(Dave,Decker,Kaestner,Simon,2008) Women and children make up most of the
population of Medicaid program beneficiaries but the disabled population of
Medicaid uses most of the funding as you can see in Figure 1.2. (chpp.org)
Figure 1.2, Disparity of enrollment and spending.
7. Medicaid Financing
Both the federal government and state governments fund Medicaid. Total
government spending on Medicaid programs was 414 billion dollars in 2011.
(chpp.org) In 2005, 1/6th
of states budgets were for Medicaid financing. (Martin et
al, 2007) The Federal Medical Assistance Percentage figures out how much the
federal government pays to the states for Medicaid. Every state has a different
percentage based on the average per capita income in that state. The average state’s
Federal Medical Assistance Percentage is 57%, while the percentage ceiling is 83%
and the floor is 50%. 82% is the federal ceiling but the poorest states are subsidized
about 73% at this time. (cbpp.org) These percentages are reevaluated every 3 years
for each state to account for the changing financial situation of the specific state.
(Medicaid.gov)
The federal government can choose to temporarily raise the percentages
paid to states, which usually happens in times of recession. The most recent
national increase in Federal Medical Assistance Percentages was during the 2007
Great Recession, which caused a base 6.2% increase for all states, Figure 1.3. The
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 was responsible for the increases
of FMAP’s due to the Great Recession. As you can see in Figure 1.3 there was a rise
in the return of federal dollars per state dollar spent on Medicaid programs. States
that experienced higher unemployment rates due to this recession were given a
larger increase of 5.5%, 8.5% or 11.5% on top of the base 6.2% increase. These
increases were evaluated on a quarterly basis based on unemployment rates in each
state as compared to the normal 3 year reevaluation technique. Under this act,
8. normal drops to their FMAP based on the original FMAP formula did not affect
states. This act put an extra 87 billion dollars of federal funding in Medicaid
programs between the years of 2009 and 2011. (Lay et al. 2009) The federal
government also has the power to increase the FMAPs on an individual state basis.
This last increase occurred in Louisiana after Hurricane Katrina.
The FMAP is also a measure of a money multiplier in a state. If a state has a
FMAP of only 50%, it means that for every dollar the federal government
reimburses the state, the state has to match that dollar, which in a sense is a money
multiplier of 1. This is also taken into account when the FMAPs are calculated so
poorer states have more federal money pumped into their economy.
Figure 1.3
Medicaid Services and Cost Sharing
What services Medicaid covers is up to the individual state except for the list
of ‘mandatory services’ that the federal government requires states to cover. There
are fifteen required benefits from inpatient and outpatient services to tobacco
cessation treatment for pregnant women. The list of 33 optional services includes
dental care, eyeglasses, dentures, etc. (medicaid.gov) The amount, type, and
duration of care are also determined by the state within the federal guidelines for
mandatory services. A state needs to pay for hospital services but can limit how
many days they will pay for a person to be in the hospital. (cbpp.org)
9. There is also some cost sharing in Medicaid programs. These also vary from
state to state. Federal law makes it illegal to make children or pregnant women
enrolled in Medicaid to have to pay anything at all for most medical services.
Pregnant women are exempt from all services having to do with their pregnancy or
a condition that could affect the pregnancy. The most common place you will find
cost sharing in Medicaid is in prescription drug purchases. The average co payment
for prescription drugs is one dollar for generic drugs and three dollars for brand
name drugs. Let it be noted that three dollars is the federal limit for co payment of
prescription drugs.
However the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 changed some of the rules about
cost sharing among Medicaid beneficiaries. The DRA allowed for there to be some
cost sharing involved for children if there was non-emergency use of emergency
services and prescription drugs in some cases. The DRA also allowed states to
invoke premiums and cost sharing on families that were enrolled in Medicaid but
were above the poverty line. Cost sharing also changed for adults under the DRA.
Most adults covered by Medicaid are exempt from cost sharing. Under the DRA
adults above the poverty line would se most of the cost sharing. If an adult is in
between 100 and 150 percent of the federal poverty line then they could be
responsible for up to 10 percent of the cost for most services, if they are above 150
percent of the FPL then they could have to pay up to 20 percent of most services.
The total cost of cost sharing for families could not exceed five percent of their
yearly income under the DRA. (Solomon, 2007)
10. There is a lot of discussion around the United States about the impact of cost
sharing and peoples use of medical services. The cost of co-payments may cause
some low-income people abuse the use of services that do not have cost sharing
applied to them, such as emergency room visits, instead of seeking the appropriate
medical service for their problem. As we saw the DRA allowed for more cost sharing
for situations like this. The DRA allows for cost sharing to be implemented in these
cases and non-preferred drugs for people who would normally be exempt for cost
sharing. A study conducted in Quebec showed that imposing copayments on
prescription drugs led filled less prescriptions on necessary drugs. There was a 78
percent increase in adverse events to these people, hospital admission, death, etc.,
seemingly due to the poorer health of people due to lack of medication. (Ku and
Wachino, 2005)