SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 5
Download to read offline
Tiffiney Cowan
Mediation Brief
Certificate in Paralegal Studies
University of Washington
Susan Winn
Attorney at Law
456 Anne Street
Seattle, WA 98121
(206) 123-4567
March 1, 2016
VIA FAX (206) 765-4321
The Honorable Judge Elaine M. Eagan
Judicial Dispute Resolution, L.L.C.
102 E. Pine St, suite 304
Seattle, WA 98101
Re: Kendricks v. Martinson
Dear Judge Eagan,
A mediation has been scheduled before you in the above matter on March 15, 2016, at 9:00 a.m.
in your offices. Susan Winn represents Marvin Martinson, doing business as Marvin’s Morsels,
and Ima Dewey represents Kathy Kendricks, doing business as Kathy’s Katering.
I. BACKGROUND
Mr. Marvin Martinson is a recently widowed father of two young children. He and his wife spent
12 years building Marvin’s Morsels and together they successfully developed a niche in the
highly competitive catering industry. Their festive, Hispanic-themed events, which always
featured their signature pork rind hors d’oeuvres, were in such demand that the business grew by
Tiffiney Cowan
Mediation Brief
Certificate in Paralegal Studies
University of Washington
205% in 2014. Mr. Martinson, his wife, and their staff of 75 employees catered nearly 1,000
events that year, including conferences, corporate meetings, weddings, and other social affairs.
Mr. Martinson was devastated when, on March 24, 2015, his wife died suddenly of
hydrocephalus, the result of a cerebral aneurysm. Overcome with grief, Mr. Martinson placed
John Jacobson, a manager at Marvin’s Morsel, in charge of the business while he helped his
children deal with the loss of their mother. Mr. Martinson also planned his wife’s funeral and
memorial service, and dealt with other matters associated with the loss of a spouse.
On April 27, 2015, Mr. Martinson was informed that Marvin’s Morsels received a “D” rating
from the King County Public Health Department. Although Mr. Martinson was not scheduled to
return to Marvin’s Morsels until May 4, 2015, he immediately focused his attention on restoring
the reputation of his business. Mr. Martinson returned to work, fired Mr. Jacobson, and called the
King County Public Health Department to schedule a series of food safety training sessions for
himself and his staff.
II. THE INCIDENT
On May 5, 2015, Ms. Kathy Kendricks met briefly with Mr. Martinson, to ask him to provide 40
hors d’oeuvres for a Bar Mitzvah Ms. Kendricks was catering. Mr. Martinson, who is well
known for his mouthwatering pork rind hors d’oeuvres, believed Ms. Kendricks was asking him
Tiffiney Cowan
Mediation Brief
Certificate in Paralegal Studies
University of Washington
to serve his signature dish. Mr. Martinson, who agreed to Ms. Kendricks’ proposal, accepted a
$2500 check from her and immediately placed a pork rind order with B&E Meats.
Mr. Martinson picked up the pork rinds from B&E Meats on June 12, 2015, and drove to the Bar
Mitzvah. Upon his arrival, Mr. Martinson learned that Ms. Kendricks had expected Mr.
Martinson to bring kosher hors d’oeuvres for 400 guests. Mr. Martinson apologized for the
misunderstanding and attempted to remedy the situation by offering to purchase kosher finger
foods at either of the two local kosher grocers. Ms. Kendricks rejected Mr. Martinson’s offer and
decided to “make due” with the pork rinds.
According to Ms. Kendricks, her client, Mr. Nehemiah Nussbaum, was furious about the pork
rinds and refused to pay Ms. Kendricks her $15,000 catering fee; however Mr. Martinson
assisted Ms. Kendricks in setting-up 25 banquet tables, covering each with the proper linens, and
carrying out more than 200 food-laden serving platters. The pork rinds consisted of 2 of those
200 platters. It is difficult to imagine that 1% of the food was so offensive as to justify non-
payment.
Five days after the Bar Mitzvah, Ms. Kendricks learned of the “D” rating Marvin’s Morsels had
received from the King County Public Health Department. Ms. Kendricks filed a claim against
Mr. Martinson for breach of contract and fraud, stating he falsely represented his ability to
perform. Neither allegation is true, as you will see below.
Tiffiney Cowan
Mediation Brief
Certificate in Paralegal Studies
University of Washington
Mr. Martinson accepted Ms. Kendricks’ offer to supply hors d’oeuvres for the Nussbaum Bar
Mitzvah for several reasons: first, for 12 years Marvin’s Morsels had received the highest ratings
from the King County Public Health Department, with the exception of the recent “D”; second,
Mr. Jacobson was no longer an employee of Marvin’s Morsels and Mr. Martinson viewed Mr.
Jacobson’s mismanagement as the primary reason for the “D” rating; third, the month-long food
safety training sessions would be completed nearly 2 weeks before the Bar Mitzvah ensuring that
both he and his staff would be ready to meet Ms. Kendricks’ catering needs; and fourth, Mr.
Martinson decided not to prepare the pork rinds at his facility as usual, but instead ordered them
from B&E Meats in order to ensure that he and his staff could give their full attention to the food
safety training sessions.
While it is unfortunate that Mr. Nussbaum has refused to pay Ms. Kendricks’ catering fee, Mr.
Martinson is in no way responsible for the dispute between Ms. Kendricks and Mr. Nussbaum.
Ms. Kendricks, as the Master of the Offer, was duty bound to ensure terms were clearly set out
and though she claims she asked Mr. Martinson to provide 400 kosher hors d’oeuvres, she has
produced neither documentation nor eyewitness account supporting her claim, while Mr.
Martinson and his employee, Lucy London, both testified that Ms. Kendricks requested 40 hors
d’oeuvres and that she did not stipulate they were to be kosher.
III. DAMAGES
Tiffiney Cowan
Mediation Brief
Certificate in Paralegal Studies
University of Washington
It is clear that Ms. Kendricks made a unilateral mistake of material fact with regards to both the
quantity and type of hors d’oeuvres she requested of Mr. Martinson. Instead of recognizing her
error, Ms. Kendricks has instead filed this baseless lawsuit against Mr. Martinson and, as a result
of having to defend himself, Mr. Martinson has been forced to sell his home and file for
bankruptcy. This loss, on the heels of his wife’s death, has devastated Mr. Martinson.
IV. SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS
Mr. Martinson has offered to return Ms. Kendricks’ $2500 and he has demanded that she dismiss
this frivolous lawsuit. Ms. Kendricks has refused.
I hope the above recitation will be of some benefit to you in the mediation of this case. I look
forward to working with you on the 15th.
In the interim, please feel free to call me if you have any questions or need additional records.
Warmly,
Susan Winn
Attorney at Law
456 Anne Street
Seattle, WA 98121
(206) 123-4567

More Related Content

What's hot

SHurd Legal Memorandum Sample
SHurd Legal Memorandum SampleSHurd Legal Memorandum Sample
SHurd Legal Memorandum SampleSandra Hurd
 
Legal Memorandum Slip and Fall 1
Legal Memorandum Slip and Fall 1Legal Memorandum Slip and Fall 1
Legal Memorandum Slip and Fall 1Valerie LeBoeuf
 
Sample collection of meet and confer letters for discovery in california
Sample collection of meet and confer letters for discovery in californiaSample collection of meet and confer letters for discovery in california
Sample collection of meet and confer letters for discovery in californiaLegalDocsPro
 
Defendants’ reply brief in response to plaintiff’s response brief and in supp...
Defendants’ reply brief in response to plaintiff’s response brief and in supp...Defendants’ reply brief in response to plaintiff’s response brief and in supp...
Defendants’ reply brief in response to plaintiff’s response brief and in supp...Cocoselul Inaripat
 
Legal Research Trial Brief Final Project
Legal Research Trial Brief Final ProjectLegal Research Trial Brief Final Project
Legal Research Trial Brief Final ProjectNicole Williams
 
Sample California motion to strike for unlawful detainer (eviction) complaint
Sample California motion to strike for unlawful detainer (eviction) complaintSample California motion to strike for unlawful detainer (eviction) complaint
Sample California motion to strike for unlawful detainer (eviction) complaintLegalDocsPro
 
Sample motion for OSC for contempt for violations of the Bankruptcy Discharge...
Sample motion for OSC for contempt for violations of the Bankruptcy Discharge...Sample motion for OSC for contempt for violations of the Bankruptcy Discharge...
Sample motion for OSC for contempt for violations of the Bankruptcy Discharge...LegalDocsPro
 
Lawsuit against WCSD alleges breach of contract, lying to court
Lawsuit against WCSD alleges breach of contract, lying to courtLawsuit against WCSD alleges breach of contract, lying to court
Lawsuit against WCSD alleges breach of contract, lying to courtThis Is Reno
 
Answer, Counterclaims & Third Party Claims - Non-Compete & Tortious Interference
Answer, Counterclaims & Third Party Claims - Non-Compete & Tortious InterferenceAnswer, Counterclaims & Third Party Claims - Non-Compete & Tortious Interference
Answer, Counterclaims & Third Party Claims - Non-Compete & Tortious InterferencePollard PLLC
 
Legal Memorandum Khan vs. Randall
Legal Memorandum Khan vs. RandallLegal Memorandum Khan vs. Randall
Legal Memorandum Khan vs. RandallNicole Williams
 
2009.09.03 motion to disqualify Varner as counsel
2009.09.03 motion to disqualify Varner as counsel2009.09.03 motion to disqualify Varner as counsel
2009.09.03 motion to disqualify Varner as counselHindenburg Research
 
Legal Memorandum
Legal MemorandumLegal Memorandum
Legal MemorandumDean Goff
 
Premise liability memo
Premise liability memoPremise liability memo
Premise liability memoMichael Currie
 
OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF LAW
OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF LAWOFFICE MEMORANDUM OF LAW
OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF LAWRaven Kittler
 
Sample ex parte application to advance hearing date for demurrer in california
Sample ex parte application to advance hearing date for demurrer in californiaSample ex parte application to advance hearing date for demurrer in california
Sample ex parte application to advance hearing date for demurrer in californiaLegalDocsPro
 

What's hot (20)

Objective memo
Objective memoObjective memo
Objective memo
 
SHurd Legal Memorandum Sample
SHurd Legal Memorandum SampleSHurd Legal Memorandum Sample
SHurd Legal Memorandum Sample
 
Legal Memorandum Slip and Fall 1
Legal Memorandum Slip and Fall 1Legal Memorandum Slip and Fall 1
Legal Memorandum Slip and Fall 1
 
Sample trial brief
Sample trial briefSample trial brief
Sample trial brief
 
MEMO OF LAW EXAMPLE
MEMO OF LAW EXAMPLEMEMO OF LAW EXAMPLE
MEMO OF LAW EXAMPLE
 
Memorandum Sample
Memorandum SampleMemorandum Sample
Memorandum Sample
 
Sample collection of meet and confer letters for discovery in california
Sample collection of meet and confer letters for discovery in californiaSample collection of meet and confer letters for discovery in california
Sample collection of meet and confer letters for discovery in california
 
Defendants’ reply brief in response to plaintiff’s response brief and in supp...
Defendants’ reply brief in response to plaintiff’s response brief and in supp...Defendants’ reply brief in response to plaintiff’s response brief and in supp...
Defendants’ reply brief in response to plaintiff’s response brief and in supp...
 
Legal Research Trial Brief Final Project
Legal Research Trial Brief Final ProjectLegal Research Trial Brief Final Project
Legal Research Trial Brief Final Project
 
Sample California motion to strike for unlawful detainer (eviction) complaint
Sample California motion to strike for unlawful detainer (eviction) complaintSample California motion to strike for unlawful detainer (eviction) complaint
Sample California motion to strike for unlawful detainer (eviction) complaint
 
Sample motion for OSC for contempt for violations of the Bankruptcy Discharge...
Sample motion for OSC for contempt for violations of the Bankruptcy Discharge...Sample motion for OSC for contempt for violations of the Bankruptcy Discharge...
Sample motion for OSC for contempt for violations of the Bankruptcy Discharge...
 
motion in limine
motion in liminemotion in limine
motion in limine
 
Lawsuit against WCSD alleges breach of contract, lying to court
Lawsuit against WCSD alleges breach of contract, lying to courtLawsuit against WCSD alleges breach of contract, lying to court
Lawsuit against WCSD alleges breach of contract, lying to court
 
Answer, Counterclaims & Third Party Claims - Non-Compete & Tortious Interference
Answer, Counterclaims & Third Party Claims - Non-Compete & Tortious InterferenceAnswer, Counterclaims & Third Party Claims - Non-Compete & Tortious Interference
Answer, Counterclaims & Third Party Claims - Non-Compete & Tortious Interference
 
Legal Memorandum Khan vs. Randall
Legal Memorandum Khan vs. RandallLegal Memorandum Khan vs. Randall
Legal Memorandum Khan vs. Randall
 
2009.09.03 motion to disqualify Varner as counsel
2009.09.03 motion to disqualify Varner as counsel2009.09.03 motion to disqualify Varner as counsel
2009.09.03 motion to disqualify Varner as counsel
 
Legal Memorandum
Legal MemorandumLegal Memorandum
Legal Memorandum
 
Premise liability memo
Premise liability memoPremise liability memo
Premise liability memo
 
OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF LAW
OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF LAWOFFICE MEMORANDUM OF LAW
OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF LAW
 
Sample ex parte application to advance hearing date for demurrer in california
Sample ex parte application to advance hearing date for demurrer in californiaSample ex parte application to advance hearing date for demurrer in california
Sample ex parte application to advance hearing date for demurrer in california
 

Mediation Brief

  • 1. Tiffiney Cowan Mediation Brief Certificate in Paralegal Studies University of Washington Susan Winn Attorney at Law 456 Anne Street Seattle, WA 98121 (206) 123-4567 March 1, 2016 VIA FAX (206) 765-4321 The Honorable Judge Elaine M. Eagan Judicial Dispute Resolution, L.L.C. 102 E. Pine St, suite 304 Seattle, WA 98101 Re: Kendricks v. Martinson Dear Judge Eagan, A mediation has been scheduled before you in the above matter on March 15, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. in your offices. Susan Winn represents Marvin Martinson, doing business as Marvin’s Morsels, and Ima Dewey represents Kathy Kendricks, doing business as Kathy’s Katering. I. BACKGROUND Mr. Marvin Martinson is a recently widowed father of two young children. He and his wife spent 12 years building Marvin’s Morsels and together they successfully developed a niche in the highly competitive catering industry. Their festive, Hispanic-themed events, which always featured their signature pork rind hors d’oeuvres, were in such demand that the business grew by
  • 2. Tiffiney Cowan Mediation Brief Certificate in Paralegal Studies University of Washington 205% in 2014. Mr. Martinson, his wife, and their staff of 75 employees catered nearly 1,000 events that year, including conferences, corporate meetings, weddings, and other social affairs. Mr. Martinson was devastated when, on March 24, 2015, his wife died suddenly of hydrocephalus, the result of a cerebral aneurysm. Overcome with grief, Mr. Martinson placed John Jacobson, a manager at Marvin’s Morsel, in charge of the business while he helped his children deal with the loss of their mother. Mr. Martinson also planned his wife’s funeral and memorial service, and dealt with other matters associated with the loss of a spouse. On April 27, 2015, Mr. Martinson was informed that Marvin’s Morsels received a “D” rating from the King County Public Health Department. Although Mr. Martinson was not scheduled to return to Marvin’s Morsels until May 4, 2015, he immediately focused his attention on restoring the reputation of his business. Mr. Martinson returned to work, fired Mr. Jacobson, and called the King County Public Health Department to schedule a series of food safety training sessions for himself and his staff. II. THE INCIDENT On May 5, 2015, Ms. Kathy Kendricks met briefly with Mr. Martinson, to ask him to provide 40 hors d’oeuvres for a Bar Mitzvah Ms. Kendricks was catering. Mr. Martinson, who is well known for his mouthwatering pork rind hors d’oeuvres, believed Ms. Kendricks was asking him
  • 3. Tiffiney Cowan Mediation Brief Certificate in Paralegal Studies University of Washington to serve his signature dish. Mr. Martinson, who agreed to Ms. Kendricks’ proposal, accepted a $2500 check from her and immediately placed a pork rind order with B&E Meats. Mr. Martinson picked up the pork rinds from B&E Meats on June 12, 2015, and drove to the Bar Mitzvah. Upon his arrival, Mr. Martinson learned that Ms. Kendricks had expected Mr. Martinson to bring kosher hors d’oeuvres for 400 guests. Mr. Martinson apologized for the misunderstanding and attempted to remedy the situation by offering to purchase kosher finger foods at either of the two local kosher grocers. Ms. Kendricks rejected Mr. Martinson’s offer and decided to “make due” with the pork rinds. According to Ms. Kendricks, her client, Mr. Nehemiah Nussbaum, was furious about the pork rinds and refused to pay Ms. Kendricks her $15,000 catering fee; however Mr. Martinson assisted Ms. Kendricks in setting-up 25 banquet tables, covering each with the proper linens, and carrying out more than 200 food-laden serving platters. The pork rinds consisted of 2 of those 200 platters. It is difficult to imagine that 1% of the food was so offensive as to justify non- payment. Five days after the Bar Mitzvah, Ms. Kendricks learned of the “D” rating Marvin’s Morsels had received from the King County Public Health Department. Ms. Kendricks filed a claim against Mr. Martinson for breach of contract and fraud, stating he falsely represented his ability to perform. Neither allegation is true, as you will see below.
  • 4. Tiffiney Cowan Mediation Brief Certificate in Paralegal Studies University of Washington Mr. Martinson accepted Ms. Kendricks’ offer to supply hors d’oeuvres for the Nussbaum Bar Mitzvah for several reasons: first, for 12 years Marvin’s Morsels had received the highest ratings from the King County Public Health Department, with the exception of the recent “D”; second, Mr. Jacobson was no longer an employee of Marvin’s Morsels and Mr. Martinson viewed Mr. Jacobson’s mismanagement as the primary reason for the “D” rating; third, the month-long food safety training sessions would be completed nearly 2 weeks before the Bar Mitzvah ensuring that both he and his staff would be ready to meet Ms. Kendricks’ catering needs; and fourth, Mr. Martinson decided not to prepare the pork rinds at his facility as usual, but instead ordered them from B&E Meats in order to ensure that he and his staff could give their full attention to the food safety training sessions. While it is unfortunate that Mr. Nussbaum has refused to pay Ms. Kendricks’ catering fee, Mr. Martinson is in no way responsible for the dispute between Ms. Kendricks and Mr. Nussbaum. Ms. Kendricks, as the Master of the Offer, was duty bound to ensure terms were clearly set out and though she claims she asked Mr. Martinson to provide 400 kosher hors d’oeuvres, she has produced neither documentation nor eyewitness account supporting her claim, while Mr. Martinson and his employee, Lucy London, both testified that Ms. Kendricks requested 40 hors d’oeuvres and that she did not stipulate they were to be kosher. III. DAMAGES
  • 5. Tiffiney Cowan Mediation Brief Certificate in Paralegal Studies University of Washington It is clear that Ms. Kendricks made a unilateral mistake of material fact with regards to both the quantity and type of hors d’oeuvres she requested of Mr. Martinson. Instead of recognizing her error, Ms. Kendricks has instead filed this baseless lawsuit against Mr. Martinson and, as a result of having to defend himself, Mr. Martinson has been forced to sell his home and file for bankruptcy. This loss, on the heels of his wife’s death, has devastated Mr. Martinson. IV. SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS Mr. Martinson has offered to return Ms. Kendricks’ $2500 and he has demanded that she dismiss this frivolous lawsuit. Ms. Kendricks has refused. I hope the above recitation will be of some benefit to you in the mediation of this case. I look forward to working with you on the 15th. In the interim, please feel free to call me if you have any questions or need additional records. Warmly, Susan Winn Attorney at Law 456 Anne Street Seattle, WA 98121 (206) 123-4567