UNESCO’s Media
Development
Indicators (MDIs)
5Ws + H
Presentation by Wijayananda Jayaweera
Director, Communication Development Division, UNESCO
Why indicators
• Development Indicators indicate desired
outcomes of development interventions.
• Indicators defines development standards
• Indicators are used effectively to asses the
development gaps
• Indicators enable the development
partners to devise a negotiated roadmap
to achieve the outcomes
What are the MDIs?
• Comprehensive set of indicators for evaluating
the media landscape of any given country.
• Five categories of indicators:
1. System of regulation and control
2. Pluralism and diversity
3. Media as a platform for democratic discourse
4. Professional capacity and supporting institutions
5. Infrastructural capacity
• Each category has key indicators and sub-
indicators, means of verification and a guide
to potential data sources
How were they developed?
• 2-year international consultation process
• Mapping of the main existing initiatives and their
respective methodologies
• Value and relevance to the priorities of the IPDC
identified
• Focus on measurable indicators, whether
qualitative or quantitative.
• Expert Group meeting
• Endorsement by Intergovernmental Council of
IPDC
Why MDIs?
• Provide a common framework for assessing
media development and approaching policy
issues
• Help in identifying and addressing development
gaps through evidence-based recommendations
• Advocacy tool for gvts, local stakeholders and
international development agencies for targeting
development assistance in the media sector in
an effective manner.
• Can be used in country programming with
UNCTs (UNDAF/CCAs), donors and partners
• Encourage endogenous longitudinal assessment
as progress is made
Applying the MDIs –
Where, when and with whom?
• Pilot MDI-based studies launched in Bhutan,
Croatia, Ecuador, the Maldives and
Mozambique.
• Request from government when possible
• Partnership with independent local research
institution/media development organization.
• Multistakeholder consultation (civil society, gvt,
parliamentarians, public and private media
organizations, etc.)
• Time frame: 6 months - 1 year per country
Promoting MDIs’ use internationally
• MDIs available in 8 languages
• Distributed to heads of all relevant UN agencies
by UNESCO DG
• MDIs acknowledged by UN agencies,
intergovernmental bodies (EU, WB...) and major
media development organizations.
• IPDC allocated $ 100,000 to support member
states wishing to make MDI assessments.
• Collaboration with UIS on new media statistics
Lessons to be learned
• Involving all major stakeholders in media dev. field
to ensure widest possible endorsement.
• Ensure balanced geographical representation to
avoid “Western” biais.
• Endorsement by intergovernmental body provides
extra legitimacy
• Quantitative > qualitative measurements when
possible; gender-sensitive, pro-poor indicators.
• Indicators conceptualized with the purpose of
assisting media development programmes, not
imposing conditionality.
• Diagnostic tool, not means for comparing countries
Conclusion
• Indicators needs a consensual agreement
for universal standards/norms/practices
• Indicators help Member States to prepare
their own road maps for development
• Indicators enables all partners to identify
their respective contributions
• Indicators enable us to link our result
based programme to national strategies

MDIs 60 minutes2010.ppt

  • 1.
    UNESCO’s Media Development Indicators (MDIs) 5Ws+ H Presentation by Wijayananda Jayaweera Director, Communication Development Division, UNESCO
  • 2.
    Why indicators • DevelopmentIndicators indicate desired outcomes of development interventions. • Indicators defines development standards • Indicators are used effectively to asses the development gaps • Indicators enable the development partners to devise a negotiated roadmap to achieve the outcomes
  • 3.
    What are theMDIs? • Comprehensive set of indicators for evaluating the media landscape of any given country. • Five categories of indicators: 1. System of regulation and control 2. Pluralism and diversity 3. Media as a platform for democratic discourse 4. Professional capacity and supporting institutions 5. Infrastructural capacity • Each category has key indicators and sub- indicators, means of verification and a guide to potential data sources
  • 4.
    How were theydeveloped? • 2-year international consultation process • Mapping of the main existing initiatives and their respective methodologies • Value and relevance to the priorities of the IPDC identified • Focus on measurable indicators, whether qualitative or quantitative. • Expert Group meeting • Endorsement by Intergovernmental Council of IPDC
  • 5.
    Why MDIs? • Providea common framework for assessing media development and approaching policy issues • Help in identifying and addressing development gaps through evidence-based recommendations • Advocacy tool for gvts, local stakeholders and international development agencies for targeting development assistance in the media sector in an effective manner. • Can be used in country programming with UNCTs (UNDAF/CCAs), donors and partners • Encourage endogenous longitudinal assessment as progress is made
  • 6.
    Applying the MDIs– Where, when and with whom? • Pilot MDI-based studies launched in Bhutan, Croatia, Ecuador, the Maldives and Mozambique. • Request from government when possible • Partnership with independent local research institution/media development organization. • Multistakeholder consultation (civil society, gvt, parliamentarians, public and private media organizations, etc.) • Time frame: 6 months - 1 year per country
  • 7.
    Promoting MDIs’ useinternationally • MDIs available in 8 languages • Distributed to heads of all relevant UN agencies by UNESCO DG • MDIs acknowledged by UN agencies, intergovernmental bodies (EU, WB...) and major media development organizations. • IPDC allocated $ 100,000 to support member states wishing to make MDI assessments. • Collaboration with UIS on new media statistics
  • 8.
    Lessons to belearned • Involving all major stakeholders in media dev. field to ensure widest possible endorsement. • Ensure balanced geographical representation to avoid “Western” biais. • Endorsement by intergovernmental body provides extra legitimacy • Quantitative > qualitative measurements when possible; gender-sensitive, pro-poor indicators. • Indicators conceptualized with the purpose of assisting media development programmes, not imposing conditionality. • Diagnostic tool, not means for comparing countries
  • 9.
    Conclusion • Indicators needsa consensual agreement for universal standards/norms/practices • Indicators help Member States to prepare their own road maps for development • Indicators enables all partners to identify their respective contributions • Indicators enable us to link our result based programme to national strategies