This document discusses the reproduction right and mechanical licensing. It begins by explaining the bundle of rights granted to copyright owners, including the reproduction right. It then discusses compulsory mechanical licenses and negotiated mechanical licenses. It explains limitations on the reproduction right, such as controlled composition clauses and song caps that limit royalties paid. It also discusses mechanical licensing agencies like Harry Fox that issue licenses. Finally, it discusses digital phonorecord deliveries and the reproduction of sound recordings.
A publisher promotes and administers songwriting by finding users for songs, issuing licenses to collect money, and paying writers. Traditionally, publishers split income 50/50 with writers and provide advances. Major publishers are affiliated with record companies, while independents handle their own administration. Publishers employ administrators, song pluggers, and creative directors to carry out these roles. Controlled composition clauses in recording contracts limit how much record labels must pay writers for use of their songs. Legislation around 100% licensing and updating sections 114 and 115 of the Copyright Act aim to ensure fair compensation for songwriters from digital streaming.
Mbu 1110 fall 2018 publishing - lecture 4Eric Griffin
A publisher takes care of the business aspects of songwriting such as finding users, issuing licenses, collecting money, and paying writers. Under a standard publishing deal, the writer assigns the copyright of their songs to the publisher, who then administers the songs. Traditionally, publishers and writers split income 50/50, though writers often receive an advance from the publisher. Major publishers are affiliated with record companies, while independent publishers handle their own administration. Publishers, songwriters, and performing rights organizations advocate for legislation that benefits their members and defend against changes that could reduce royalties or control.
Copyright seeks to balance author and public interests by protecting the expression of ideas but not the underlying ideas themselves. Copyright protects works that are fixed in a tangible medium and provides authors with a bundle of exclusive rights including reproduction, distribution, public performance, creation of derivatives, and digital audio transmission. Copyright duration for individual works is the life of the author plus 70 years. Mechanical royalties from streaming services are typically a fraction of a penny per stream and must meet certain thresholds to earn substantial amounts. Fair use is an exception that allows limited unauthorized use of copyrighted works for purposes like education or commentary.
Copyright provides creators exclusive rights to their works for a limited time to promote innovation. Works are automatically copyrighted at creation if they are original and fixed in a tangible form. The main rights include reproduction, distribution, public performance, derivatives, and public display. While copyright is secured automatically, registration provides additional benefits. There is a compulsory mechanical license for releasing new recordings of previously published songs for a set statutory rate, currently 9.1 cents per song. This rate and other foreign mechanical rates are typically used as benchmarks in licensing negotiations.
This document discusses advanced copyright concepts related to joint works, works for hire, copyright duration, and digital performance rights. Some key points:
- For joint works created by multiple authors, each author owns a share of the entire work and either author can issue non-exclusive licenses as long as they pay the other authors.
- Works made for hire transfer full copyright ownership to the employer or commissioner of the work. Songwriters' songs are generally not considered works for hire.
- Copyright duration was extended in 1978 to the life of the author plus 50 years and pre-1978 works received an additional 20 years of protection.
- Authors have a right of termination to regain ownership of copyrights 35 years after
The document discusses several key concepts in copyright law:
1) The 1998 Sonny Bono Act extended copyright terms to life of the author plus 70 years and 95 years from publication for older works, bringing the US in line with longer European terms.
2) The Act also gave libraries and archives rights to make copies during the 20-year extension and suggested film and TV companies divide revenues from the extension.
3) The Fairness in Music Licensing Act allowed certain small businesses to play music without a license.
4) Digital sampling requires securing rights to the master recording and publishing. Registration is recommended to enable full legal protections for copyrighted works. Failing to register limits remedies for infringement.
During Music Biz 2015 in Nashville, Jacqueline Charlesworth, General Counsel and Associate Register of Copyrights at the U.S. Copyright Office, discussed important legislation surrounding
copyrights, including proposed changes to the U.S. Copyright Act and the recently reintroduced Songwriter Equity Act.
Copyright law grants rights over music that can be licensed to generate income. There are two basic copyrights - one for the song/lyrics called a PA, and one for the sound recording called an SR. The big four licenses needed are for performance, mechanical reproduction, synchronization, and master use. Performance rights organizations like ASCAP and BMI collect blanket license fees and distribute royalties to members. Obtaining the proper licenses is important for using music in films, videos, games, broadcasts and other commercial applications.
A publisher promotes and administers songwriting by finding users for songs, issuing licenses to collect money, and paying writers. Traditionally, publishers split income 50/50 with writers and provide advances. Major publishers are affiliated with record companies, while independents handle their own administration. Publishers employ administrators, song pluggers, and creative directors to carry out these roles. Controlled composition clauses in recording contracts limit how much record labels must pay writers for use of their songs. Legislation around 100% licensing and updating sections 114 and 115 of the Copyright Act aim to ensure fair compensation for songwriters from digital streaming.
Mbu 1110 fall 2018 publishing - lecture 4Eric Griffin
A publisher takes care of the business aspects of songwriting such as finding users, issuing licenses, collecting money, and paying writers. Under a standard publishing deal, the writer assigns the copyright of their songs to the publisher, who then administers the songs. Traditionally, publishers and writers split income 50/50, though writers often receive an advance from the publisher. Major publishers are affiliated with record companies, while independent publishers handle their own administration. Publishers, songwriters, and performing rights organizations advocate for legislation that benefits their members and defend against changes that could reduce royalties or control.
Copyright seeks to balance author and public interests by protecting the expression of ideas but not the underlying ideas themselves. Copyright protects works that are fixed in a tangible medium and provides authors with a bundle of exclusive rights including reproduction, distribution, public performance, creation of derivatives, and digital audio transmission. Copyright duration for individual works is the life of the author plus 70 years. Mechanical royalties from streaming services are typically a fraction of a penny per stream and must meet certain thresholds to earn substantial amounts. Fair use is an exception that allows limited unauthorized use of copyrighted works for purposes like education or commentary.
Copyright provides creators exclusive rights to their works for a limited time to promote innovation. Works are automatically copyrighted at creation if they are original and fixed in a tangible form. The main rights include reproduction, distribution, public performance, derivatives, and public display. While copyright is secured automatically, registration provides additional benefits. There is a compulsory mechanical license for releasing new recordings of previously published songs for a set statutory rate, currently 9.1 cents per song. This rate and other foreign mechanical rates are typically used as benchmarks in licensing negotiations.
This document discusses advanced copyright concepts related to joint works, works for hire, copyright duration, and digital performance rights. Some key points:
- For joint works created by multiple authors, each author owns a share of the entire work and either author can issue non-exclusive licenses as long as they pay the other authors.
- Works made for hire transfer full copyright ownership to the employer or commissioner of the work. Songwriters' songs are generally not considered works for hire.
- Copyright duration was extended in 1978 to the life of the author plus 50 years and pre-1978 works received an additional 20 years of protection.
- Authors have a right of termination to regain ownership of copyrights 35 years after
The document discusses several key concepts in copyright law:
1) The 1998 Sonny Bono Act extended copyright terms to life of the author plus 70 years and 95 years from publication for older works, bringing the US in line with longer European terms.
2) The Act also gave libraries and archives rights to make copies during the 20-year extension and suggested film and TV companies divide revenues from the extension.
3) The Fairness in Music Licensing Act allowed certain small businesses to play music without a license.
4) Digital sampling requires securing rights to the master recording and publishing. Registration is recommended to enable full legal protections for copyrighted works. Failing to register limits remedies for infringement.
During Music Biz 2015 in Nashville, Jacqueline Charlesworth, General Counsel and Associate Register of Copyrights at the U.S. Copyright Office, discussed important legislation surrounding
copyrights, including proposed changes to the U.S. Copyright Act and the recently reintroduced Songwriter Equity Act.
Copyright law grants rights over music that can be licensed to generate income. There are two basic copyrights - one for the song/lyrics called a PA, and one for the sound recording called an SR. The big four licenses needed are for performance, mechanical reproduction, synchronization, and master use. Performance rights organizations like ASCAP and BMI collect blanket license fees and distribute royalties to members. Obtaining the proper licenses is important for using music in films, videos, games, broadcasts and other commercial applications.
The document discusses the bundle of exclusive rights granted to copyright owners under US law, including the rights of reproduction, distribution, public performance, derivative works, and public display. It focuses on the reproduction right and limitations on this right such as compulsory mechanical licenses and negotiated mechanical licenses. It describes agencies like Harry Fox that administer mechanical licenses and issues related to digital downloads and sampling sound recordings.
The document discusses copyright and the bundle of rights it provides authors/creators, including the rights of reproduction, distribution, public performance, derivatives, display, and digital audio transmission. It focuses on the public performance right, explaining that it applies to compositions but not sound recordings. The public performance right covers live, recorded, and transmitted performances. It also discusses what constitutes a "public" performance and the organizations that collect public performance royalties, including ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC. It notes some limitations on the public performance right, including exemptions for educational and nonprofit uses.
The document discusses copyright and performance rights. It begins by outlining the bundle of rights granted to creators under US copyright law, including reproduction, distribution, public performance, derivatives, display, and digital audio transmission. It then focuses on the public performance right, explaining that it applies to compositions but not sound recordings. It describes what constitutes a public performance and discusses limitations on the right. The document also outlines the roles of Performing Rights Organizations (PROs) like ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC, which issue licenses and collect/distribute fees. It provides information on how PROs monitor performances to determine royalty payments. Finally, it discusses various pieces of legislation impacting copyright like the Songwriter's Equity Act and
The record label industry consists of various roles like label managers, A&R representatives, studio engineers, and producers who are usually employed by labels. Record deals can be development deals where an act receives studio time and a producer, or exclusive recording deals where an act produces a number of albums for the label. Record contracts specify clauses around exclusivity, royalties, deductions, advances, licensing, and termination. Major labels have around 80% of the market share while independents have 20%. Organizations like IFPI, RIAA, and BIEM represent the industry globally.
The document discusses the history and major aspects of music copyright law in the United States. It covers what is copyrightable, the exclusive rights granted to copyright holders, exceptions like fair use, duration of copyright, ownership and transfer of copyright, and penalties for infringement and piracy. Key points include that both the musical work itself and sound recordings can be copyrighted, fair use allows some non-commercial uses, and copyright duration is currently the life of the author plus 70 years.
The document discusses the history and major aspects of music copyright law in the United States. It covers what is copyrightable, the exclusive rights granted to copyright holders, exceptions like fair use, duration of copyright, ownership and transfer of copyright, and penalties for infringement and piracy. Key points include that both the musical work itself and sound recordings can be copyrighted, fair use allows some non-commercial uses, and copyright duration is currently the life of the author plus 70 years.
The document discusses copyright law and the derivative right. It defines a derivative work as taking an existing work and adapting it to create a new work. A derivative work must borrow from and recast the original work, adding new original expression. Common types of derivative works include adaptations, translations, and arrangements. For a musical arrangement to be considered derivative and copyrightable, it must contain substantial variations beyond minor changes. The document also discusses limitations on derivative works and the distribution right under copyright law.
Royalty Claim - [Preview] The State of Unclaimed Royalties and Music Licenses...Dae Bogan
This presentation was given by Royalty Claim's Founder and Chief Researcher, Dae Bogan, at the Music Industry Research Associations first inaugural MIRA Conference at the UCLA Luskin Conference Center on August 11th, 2017.
This document summarizes various sources of secondary publishing income for songwriters and music publishers, including royalties from printed sheet music and folios, synchronization licenses for use of music in films and television, performance royalties from radio play and digital streaming services, and deals with foreign subpublishers. It provides details on typical royalty rates and fees across these different uses and mediums.
The document discusses various aspects of record deals and music economics. It provides details on royalty payments, copyright ownership, and the different types of payments received by songwriters, recording artists, record labels, and music publishers. It also summarizes the key components of major label recording deals, including recording funds, advances, royalties, deductions, and recoupables. Common deal types are outlined, such as demo deals, distribution deals, and production deals. The economics of major label deals and do-it-yourself label deals are compared.
The document discusses the distribution channels and ownership of music for two recording artists from rival record labels Sony and Time Warner. It instructs the reader to produce flow charts comparing how each artist is distributed and conclude their findings. Information is provided about record labels, how artists earn revenue, songwriting royalties, and mechanical royalties paid to recording artists. Key details include that record labels manage branding and copyrights, coordinate production and promotion, and maintain contracts with artists. Revenue comes from sales, performances, sheet music, and sync licenses. Ownership of songs is split between songwriters, publishers, recording artists, and record labels.
1. Music publishers administer songwriting copyrights by finding users of songs, issuing licenses to collect royalty payments, and distributing money to songwriters.
2. Major sources of income for publishers include mechanical royalties paid by record labels for songs used on recordings, as well as performance royalties collected by PROs like ASCAP and BMI.
3. Record labels use controlled composition clauses to limit the mechanical royalty rates paid for songs written by artists in order to reduce costs, though more successful artists can negotiate better terms.
The document discusses copyright law and the bundle of rights it provides, including the derivative right and distribution right. It explains that the derivative right allows owners to adapt or revise a work, and provides examples of derivative works like translations, arrangements, and remixes/mashups. The distribution right allows owners to distribute and authorize distribution of copies. It discusses limitations like the first sale doctrine, and how piracy violates the reproduction and distribution rights.
Business and contracts in the recording and music publishing industryThis account is closed
Want to learn more about business and contracts in the recording and music publishing industry? In this presentation originally delivered as part of the Media and Copyright Issues Panel at the 2014 IPIC McGill Copyright Master Class, leading entertainment lawyer Susan Abramovitch provides a helpful overview of the business, including:
-Rights of the artist/songwriter
-Artist recording agreements – from term and territory to budget and royalties
-License agreements
-Pressing and distribution agreements
-Publishing agreements
-Income splits
-Income from compositions
-360 deals
This document discusses the complex issues around music copyright and how the industry has struggled to adapt to digital technologies and distribution models. It provides a brief history of music copyright law and outlines how recording contracts traditionally benefited corporations at the expense of artists. The document also shows how digital sharing disrupted old business models and formats, leading to lawsuits against customers instead of innovative solutions. While change has been slow, newer models and copyright approaches are emerging, though challenges still remain in fully adapting the industry to the digital age.
This document provides an overview of music licensing for television programs and motion pictures. It discusses that television programs and films often use popular songs which require two separate copyright licenses - one for the musical composition from the music publisher and one for the specific recording from the record company. For a television program, licenses are needed for any rebroadcasts or videotaped repeats that include the songs, while live broadcasts may only require a performance license. Motion picture licenses aim to secure rights across all media in perpetuity.
This document discusses royalties, licensing, and income streams in the music business. It defines the types of works that can be copyrighted and the organizations that collect fees for different uses of music, such as performance rights organizations. Royalties are fees paid for uses of copyrighted works, including mechanical royalties for cover songs and performance royalties for public performances. Licensing involves granting permission to use musical works for a fee. There are various types of licenses for different uses of music. Income can be generated from many music business activities that involve licensing copyrighted works.
This document discusses various types of music licensing. It explains that synchronization (sync) licenses allow music to be paired with visual media like TV shows, movies, and videos. There are also master recording licenses, mechanical licenses for physical music formats, videogram licenses for video, print licenses for sheet music, and more. Television and motion picture licenses can cover various rights across different media and territories. Home video licenses may use flat fees, royalty structures, or limited buyouts. Multi-media licensing is still developing standards. License fees can range greatly depending on the type and scale of the project, from $2,000-$10,000 for basic TV usage to $75,000-$500,000 for commercials.
Permission is generally required to use copyrighted music. Music licensing provides this permission and involves songwriters, publishers, record labels, and performing rights organizations. There are different types of music licenses including mechanical licenses for recorded music, synchronization licenses for use in video, and performing rights licenses for live performances. Licensing fees are determined by factors like territory, media, and usage. Revenue from popular songs can reach millions from licenses while licensing agencies collect and distribute royalties to copyright holders.
Digital music exploitation in Nigeria - Digital Licensing Committee recommend...Simon Aderinlola
Music services are the largest part of Nigeria's mVAS. Litigations fly, local copyright owners suffer, an industry sub-sector is at risk. A step back review indicates that the rules - designed for vinyl and CD - have not been upgraded in an environment where OTT players have taken off. This is a call to revisit first principles.
This document discusses copyright infringement, including what constitutes infringement, how to prove infringement, and types of liability. It defines infringement as exercising any of the copyright owner's exclusive rights without permission. To prove infringement, a plaintiff must show ownership of a valid copyright and unauthorized copying. Copying can be proven directly or through circumstantial evidence of access and substantial similarity. There are two types of liability - direct liability for the direct infringer, and secondary liability for third parties who aid or benefit from the infringement, such as through contributory, vicarious, or inducement liability.
This document summarizes copyright formalities including registration, notice, and deposit. It discusses how registration provides evidence of ownership and allows for statutory damages and attorney fees. Registration can be done online or by mail and requires the proper application, work deposit, and fee. Notice of copyright is no longer required but is still recommended to provide notice of protected status. Deposit of the work is also required within 3 months of publication for the copyright office to maintain a copy.
The document discusses the bundle of exclusive rights granted to copyright owners under US law, including the rights of reproduction, distribution, public performance, derivative works, and public display. It focuses on the reproduction right and limitations on this right such as compulsory mechanical licenses and negotiated mechanical licenses. It describes agencies like Harry Fox that administer mechanical licenses and issues related to digital downloads and sampling sound recordings.
The document discusses copyright and the bundle of rights it provides authors/creators, including the rights of reproduction, distribution, public performance, derivatives, display, and digital audio transmission. It focuses on the public performance right, explaining that it applies to compositions but not sound recordings. The public performance right covers live, recorded, and transmitted performances. It also discusses what constitutes a "public" performance and the organizations that collect public performance royalties, including ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC. It notes some limitations on the public performance right, including exemptions for educational and nonprofit uses.
The document discusses copyright and performance rights. It begins by outlining the bundle of rights granted to creators under US copyright law, including reproduction, distribution, public performance, derivatives, display, and digital audio transmission. It then focuses on the public performance right, explaining that it applies to compositions but not sound recordings. It describes what constitutes a public performance and discusses limitations on the right. The document also outlines the roles of Performing Rights Organizations (PROs) like ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC, which issue licenses and collect/distribute fees. It provides information on how PROs monitor performances to determine royalty payments. Finally, it discusses various pieces of legislation impacting copyright like the Songwriter's Equity Act and
The record label industry consists of various roles like label managers, A&R representatives, studio engineers, and producers who are usually employed by labels. Record deals can be development deals where an act receives studio time and a producer, or exclusive recording deals where an act produces a number of albums for the label. Record contracts specify clauses around exclusivity, royalties, deductions, advances, licensing, and termination. Major labels have around 80% of the market share while independents have 20%. Organizations like IFPI, RIAA, and BIEM represent the industry globally.
The document discusses the history and major aspects of music copyright law in the United States. It covers what is copyrightable, the exclusive rights granted to copyright holders, exceptions like fair use, duration of copyright, ownership and transfer of copyright, and penalties for infringement and piracy. Key points include that both the musical work itself and sound recordings can be copyrighted, fair use allows some non-commercial uses, and copyright duration is currently the life of the author plus 70 years.
The document discusses the history and major aspects of music copyright law in the United States. It covers what is copyrightable, the exclusive rights granted to copyright holders, exceptions like fair use, duration of copyright, ownership and transfer of copyright, and penalties for infringement and piracy. Key points include that both the musical work itself and sound recordings can be copyrighted, fair use allows some non-commercial uses, and copyright duration is currently the life of the author plus 70 years.
The document discusses copyright law and the derivative right. It defines a derivative work as taking an existing work and adapting it to create a new work. A derivative work must borrow from and recast the original work, adding new original expression. Common types of derivative works include adaptations, translations, and arrangements. For a musical arrangement to be considered derivative and copyrightable, it must contain substantial variations beyond minor changes. The document also discusses limitations on derivative works and the distribution right under copyright law.
Royalty Claim - [Preview] The State of Unclaimed Royalties and Music Licenses...Dae Bogan
This presentation was given by Royalty Claim's Founder and Chief Researcher, Dae Bogan, at the Music Industry Research Associations first inaugural MIRA Conference at the UCLA Luskin Conference Center on August 11th, 2017.
This document summarizes various sources of secondary publishing income for songwriters and music publishers, including royalties from printed sheet music and folios, synchronization licenses for use of music in films and television, performance royalties from radio play and digital streaming services, and deals with foreign subpublishers. It provides details on typical royalty rates and fees across these different uses and mediums.
The document discusses various aspects of record deals and music economics. It provides details on royalty payments, copyright ownership, and the different types of payments received by songwriters, recording artists, record labels, and music publishers. It also summarizes the key components of major label recording deals, including recording funds, advances, royalties, deductions, and recoupables. Common deal types are outlined, such as demo deals, distribution deals, and production deals. The economics of major label deals and do-it-yourself label deals are compared.
The document discusses the distribution channels and ownership of music for two recording artists from rival record labels Sony and Time Warner. It instructs the reader to produce flow charts comparing how each artist is distributed and conclude their findings. Information is provided about record labels, how artists earn revenue, songwriting royalties, and mechanical royalties paid to recording artists. Key details include that record labels manage branding and copyrights, coordinate production and promotion, and maintain contracts with artists. Revenue comes from sales, performances, sheet music, and sync licenses. Ownership of songs is split between songwriters, publishers, recording artists, and record labels.
1. Music publishers administer songwriting copyrights by finding users of songs, issuing licenses to collect royalty payments, and distributing money to songwriters.
2. Major sources of income for publishers include mechanical royalties paid by record labels for songs used on recordings, as well as performance royalties collected by PROs like ASCAP and BMI.
3. Record labels use controlled composition clauses to limit the mechanical royalty rates paid for songs written by artists in order to reduce costs, though more successful artists can negotiate better terms.
The document discusses copyright law and the bundle of rights it provides, including the derivative right and distribution right. It explains that the derivative right allows owners to adapt or revise a work, and provides examples of derivative works like translations, arrangements, and remixes/mashups. The distribution right allows owners to distribute and authorize distribution of copies. It discusses limitations like the first sale doctrine, and how piracy violates the reproduction and distribution rights.
Business and contracts in the recording and music publishing industryThis account is closed
Want to learn more about business and contracts in the recording and music publishing industry? In this presentation originally delivered as part of the Media and Copyright Issues Panel at the 2014 IPIC McGill Copyright Master Class, leading entertainment lawyer Susan Abramovitch provides a helpful overview of the business, including:
-Rights of the artist/songwriter
-Artist recording agreements – from term and territory to budget and royalties
-License agreements
-Pressing and distribution agreements
-Publishing agreements
-Income splits
-Income from compositions
-360 deals
This document discusses the complex issues around music copyright and how the industry has struggled to adapt to digital technologies and distribution models. It provides a brief history of music copyright law and outlines how recording contracts traditionally benefited corporations at the expense of artists. The document also shows how digital sharing disrupted old business models and formats, leading to lawsuits against customers instead of innovative solutions. While change has been slow, newer models and copyright approaches are emerging, though challenges still remain in fully adapting the industry to the digital age.
This document provides an overview of music licensing for television programs and motion pictures. It discusses that television programs and films often use popular songs which require two separate copyright licenses - one for the musical composition from the music publisher and one for the specific recording from the record company. For a television program, licenses are needed for any rebroadcasts or videotaped repeats that include the songs, while live broadcasts may only require a performance license. Motion picture licenses aim to secure rights across all media in perpetuity.
This document discusses royalties, licensing, and income streams in the music business. It defines the types of works that can be copyrighted and the organizations that collect fees for different uses of music, such as performance rights organizations. Royalties are fees paid for uses of copyrighted works, including mechanical royalties for cover songs and performance royalties for public performances. Licensing involves granting permission to use musical works for a fee. There are various types of licenses for different uses of music. Income can be generated from many music business activities that involve licensing copyrighted works.
This document discusses various types of music licensing. It explains that synchronization (sync) licenses allow music to be paired with visual media like TV shows, movies, and videos. There are also master recording licenses, mechanical licenses for physical music formats, videogram licenses for video, print licenses for sheet music, and more. Television and motion picture licenses can cover various rights across different media and territories. Home video licenses may use flat fees, royalty structures, or limited buyouts. Multi-media licensing is still developing standards. License fees can range greatly depending on the type and scale of the project, from $2,000-$10,000 for basic TV usage to $75,000-$500,000 for commercials.
Permission is generally required to use copyrighted music. Music licensing provides this permission and involves songwriters, publishers, record labels, and performing rights organizations. There are different types of music licenses including mechanical licenses for recorded music, synchronization licenses for use in video, and performing rights licenses for live performances. Licensing fees are determined by factors like territory, media, and usage. Revenue from popular songs can reach millions from licenses while licensing agencies collect and distribute royalties to copyright holders.
Digital music exploitation in Nigeria - Digital Licensing Committee recommend...Simon Aderinlola
Music services are the largest part of Nigeria's mVAS. Litigations fly, local copyright owners suffer, an industry sub-sector is at risk. A step back review indicates that the rules - designed for vinyl and CD - have not been upgraded in an environment where OTT players have taken off. This is a call to revisit first principles.
This document discusses copyright infringement, including what constitutes infringement, how to prove infringement, and types of liability. It defines infringement as exercising any of the copyright owner's exclusive rights without permission. To prove infringement, a plaintiff must show ownership of a valid copyright and unauthorized copying. Copying can be proven directly or through circumstantial evidence of access and substantial similarity. There are two types of liability - direct liability for the direct infringer, and secondary liability for third parties who aid or benefit from the infringement, such as through contributory, vicarious, or inducement liability.
This document summarizes copyright formalities including registration, notice, and deposit. It discusses how registration provides evidence of ownership and allows for statutory damages and attorney fees. Registration can be done online or by mail and requires the proper application, work deposit, and fee. Notice of copyright is no longer required but is still recommended to provide notice of protected status. Deposit of the work is also required within 3 months of publication for the copyright office to maintain a copy.
The document summarizes copyright duration rules in the United States. It explains that under the 1909 Copyright Act, copyrights had an initial 28 year term that could be renewed for another 28 years. Many works fell into the public domain due to failure to renew. The 1976 Copyright Act replaced this system with a single copyright term based on the life of the author plus 70 years. The document provides details on determining copyright status and term length for works created before and after 1978. It also discusses some exceptions and amendments related to foreign and restored copyrights.
The document discusses copyright ownership and transfers, noting that copyright initially belongs to the author of a work but can be transferred through assignment or exclusive license. It also examines joint works, works made for hire, and exceptions where initial ownership vests in employers rather than authors. The document further analyzes termination of transfers, explaining the author's ability to reclaim copyright ownership after a specified period of time.
This document provides an overview of copyright law as it relates to musical works and sound recordings. It discusses the categories of copyrightable works, including literary works, musical works, sound recordings, and compilations. For musical works, it explains that copyright protects the original expression of melody, harmony, rhythm, and optionally lyrics, but not individual musical elements alone. It also discusses requirements for musical works to be protected, such as originality, expression, and fixation in a tangible medium. Case law examples illustrate what constitutes an original musical work. The document also defines sound recordings and notes they are separate from the underlying musical works. It concludes with a summary of the Feist Publications Supreme Court case establishing that facts are not copyrightable.
The document summarizes the history of copyright law from the Licensing Act of 1662 to modern US copyright law under the Copyright Act of 1976. It discusses several important acts and developments, including the Statute of Anne in 1710, the US Constitution giving Congress power to establish copyright, and US Copyright Acts of 1790, 1831, 1909, and 1976 that expanded copyright terms and protections. The Berne Convention of 1886 established international copyright standards that the US later joined in 1989.
This document provides an overview of copyright including:
- Copyright gives creators control and profits from their creative works by granting exclusive rights.
- The bundle of rights includes reproduction, distribution, performance, derivatives, and display.
- Copyright duration is typically life of author plus 70 years or 95/120 years for works made for hire.
- Philosophies of copyright include author's rights, user's rights, and economic rights, with the US following an economic approach.
Mbu 1100 fall 2019 lecture 9 groups egEric Griffin
This document discusses key provisions for record deals involving musical groups. It notes that group contracts often include key member clauses, giving the record label rights over any member that leaves or breaches the agreement. The document also recommends that musical groups establish band agreements to determine ownership of their name and brand, financial splits between members, rules for adding or removing members, and what will happen if the group dissolves. Finally, it stresses the importance of establishing a formal business entity like an LLC or corporation to manage the group's affairs and avoid legal issues.
Mbu 1100 fall 2019 lecture 8 getting started egEric Griffin
This document provides a checklist for new artists to get started in the music business. It recommends that artists register their copyrights, keep records of ownership, draft agreements between band members, trademark their name and logo, form necessary business entities, register with performing rights organizations, arrange for distribution of music and merchandise, embed metadata, register websites and social media, consider booking agents and publicists, and look into relevant industry organizations. The checklist covers important legal and business steps for artists to protect their work and maximize revenue opportunities.
The document discusses several topics related to touring and merchandising for musical artists. It provides guidance on matching an artist's image to appropriate venues and genres. It also outlines responsibilities of agents in areas like ticket sales, sponsorship deals, and financial accounting. New artists are advised to either play small venues on their own or open for established artists to gain exposure. The document also discusses strategies for merchandising, including different types of tour and retail merchandising deals.
GRIFFIN COPYRIGHT MBU 2520 REVISED FALL 2019 chapter 14Eric Griffin
This document summarizes key aspects of copyright and digital technology, including benefits and challenges of digital music distribution, the reproduction and performance rights, legislation regarding radio performance royalties, and arguments for and against the Music Modernization Act. The Music Modernization Act aims to help ensure songwriters are paid for music streaming by creating a mechanical licensing collective to collect and distribute royalties, but some argue it favors major publishers and retroactively limits liability for services.
GRIFFIN COPYRIGHT MBU 2520 FALL 2019 THE FUTUREEric Griffin
Marc Geiger warned that music labels and publishers will have to adapt to digital technology and embrace change, or they will disappear within 5 years. The document also outlines recommendations to update copyright law for the digital age, including establishing a "Creator's Bill of Rights" that guarantees fair compensation and transparency for music creators. It proposes using blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies to better manage online payments to creators.
GRIFFIN COPYRIGHT MBU 2520 FALL 2019 chapter 15Eric Griffin
MP3.com launched a service that allowed users to access music collections online from any location by copying music from commercial CDs onto its servers. The court found this copying to not be fair use and awarded $53 million to UMG, as MP3.com was duplicating entire CDs for commercial purposes without authorization from copyright holders. While users had to prove CD ownership, MP3.com still engaged in unauthorized copying of the music files.
GRIFFIN COPYRIGHT MBU 2520 FALL 2019 chapter 12Eric Griffin
This document discusses remedies for copyright infringement, including coercive remedies like injunctions, impoundment, and destruction to prevent further infringement. It also discusses compensatory remedies like actual damages and profits as well as statutory damages to compensate copyright owners. Criminal remedies are also outlined, including increased penalties for willful infringement, pre-release piracy, and circumventing copyright protection systems.
GRIFFIN COPYRIGHT MBU 2520 FALL 2019 chapter 11Eric Griffin
The document discusses defenses to copyright infringement claims, including the statute of limitations defense, abandonment defense, and fair use defense. It provides explanations of these defenses and examples to illustrate them. It also discusses the four factors courts consider when determining whether a use of a copyrighted work constitutes fair use. These factors are: (1) the purpose and character of the use, (2) the nature of the copyrighted work, (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used, and (4) the effect of the use on the potential market.
GRIFFIN COPYRIGHT MBU 2520 FALL 2019 chapter 10Eric Griffin
This document discusses copyright infringement. It defines infringement as exercising any of the copyright owner's exclusive rights without permission. A single act can violate multiple rights. Examples of infringement include recording a song without permission or distributing a recording without permission. To prove infringement, a plaintiff must prove they own a valid copyright and that the defendant copied the copyrighted work without permission. This can be shown through access to the work and substantial similarity between the works. Fragmented copying of important elements can also constitute infringement. Federal court is where infringement lawsuits are typically brought.
This document discusses key provisions for group record deals and band agreements. It outlines clauses like the key member clause, rights to leaving members, ownership of the band name, splitting percentages and finances, controlling voting and decision making, adding or removing members, contributions, amending agreements, and what happens in cases of death, disability or dissolution of the band. It also reviews different types of business entities bands can form like sole proprietorships, partnerships, LLCs and corporations to establish ownership and liability structures.
The document provides an extensive checklist for artists getting started in the music business. It recommends registering copyrights, tracking ownership of intellectual property, drafting agreements between band members, trademarking names and logos, forming companies, registering with performing rights organizations, digital distributors, and SoundExchange. It also suggests embedding metadata, securing websites and social profiles, utilizing video, booking agents, publicists, attending conferences, and obtaining insurance. The overall message is to take legal protections seriously, work hard to create and promote music, and enjoy the creative process.
The document discusses several key aspects of touring for artists:
1. The image and genre of the artist should match the tour venues to attract their core audience. A small, full room is preferable to a large, empty arena.
2. Agents are responsible for collecting deposits from promoters, usually 50% of the guarantee in advance, to ensure the promoter pays what is owed. If a promoter does not pay the deposit, they may not pay the rest.
3. New artists will likely lose money on early tours due to poor conditions and small audiences waiting for the headliner. They can play small venues independently or open for an established artist.
MBU 1110 Fall 2019 - Record Companies & Deals - Lecture #5Eric Griffin
The document discusses independent and major record labels. It states that in 2016-2017, independent labels collectively had a larger market share than any single major label. It also provides information on RIAA certification levels, royalty calculations for a gold album, and how much money an artist could expect to make from a gold album after costs are deducted (around $170,000, though they would not receive the full amount at once due to reserves held for returns).
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit InnovationTechSoup
In this webinar, participants learned how to utilize Generative AI to streamline operations and elevate member engagement. Amazon Web Service experts provided a customer specific use cases and dived into low/no-code tools that are quick and easy to deploy through Amazon Web Service (AWS.)
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdfTechSoup
"Learn about all the ways Walmart supports nonprofit organizations.
You will hear from Liz Willett, the Head of Nonprofits, and hear about what Walmart is doing to help nonprofits, including Walmart Business and Spark Good. Walmart Business+ is a new offer for nonprofits that offers discounts and also streamlines nonprofits order and expense tracking, saving time and money.
The webinar may also give some examples on how nonprofits can best leverage Walmart Business+.
The event will cover the following::
Walmart Business + (https://business.walmart.com/plus) is a new shopping experience for nonprofits, schools, and local business customers that connects an exclusive online shopping experience to stores. Benefits include free delivery and shipping, a 'Spend Analytics” feature, special discounts, deals and tax-exempt shopping.
Special TechSoup offer for a free 180 days membership, and up to $150 in discounts on eligible orders.
Spark Good (walmart.com/sparkgood) is a charitable platform that enables nonprofits to receive donations directly from customers and associates.
Answers about how you can do more with Walmart!"
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UPRAHUL
This Dissertation explores the particular circumstances of Mirzapur, a region located in the
core of India. Mirzapur, with its varied terrains and abundant biodiversity, offers an optimal
environment for investigating the changes in vegetation cover dynamics. Our study utilizes
advanced technologies such as GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and Remote sensing to
analyze the transformations that have taken place over the course of a decade.
The complex relationship between human activities and the environment has been the focus
of extensive research and worry. As the global community grapples with swift urbanization,
population expansion, and economic progress, the effects on natural ecosystems are becoming
more evident. A crucial element of this impact is the alteration of vegetation cover, which plays a
significant role in maintaining the ecological equilibrium of our planet.Land serves as the foundation for all human activities and provides the necessary materials for
these activities. As the most crucial natural resource, its utilization by humans results in different
'Land uses,' which are determined by both human activities and the physical characteristics of the
land.
The utilization of land is impacted by human needs and environmental factors. In countries
like India, rapid population growth and the emphasis on extensive resource exploitation can lead
to significant land degradation, adversely affecting the region's land cover.
Therefore, human intervention has significantly influenced land use patterns over many
centuries, evolving its structure over time and space. In the present era, these changes have
accelerated due to factors such as agriculture and urbanization. Information regarding land use and
cover is essential for various planning and management tasks related to the Earth's surface,
providing crucial environmental data for scientific, resource management, policy purposes, and
diverse human activities.
Accurate understanding of land use and cover is imperative for the development planning
of any area. Consequently, a wide range of professionals, including earth system scientists, land
and water managers, and urban planners, are interested in obtaining data on land use and cover
changes, conversion trends, and other related patterns. The spatial dimensions of land use and
cover support policymakers and scientists in making well-informed decisions, as alterations in
these patterns indicate shifts in economic and social conditions. Monitoring such changes with the
help of Advanced technologies like Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems is
crucial for coordinated efforts across different administrative levels. Advanced technologies like
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems
9
Changes in vegetation cover refer to variations in the distribution, composition, and overall
structure of plant communities across different temporal and spatial scales. These changes can
occur natural.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
1. MBU 2520 Spring 2018 - Eric M. Griffin
The Reproduction Right
2. The COPYRIGHT Bundle of Rights
MBU 2520 Spring 2018 - Eric M. Griffin
.
Under the US Constitution, Copyright guarantees an exclusive “Bundle of Rights” to
Authors/Creators. This essentially creates a ”Limited Duration Monopoly.”
The Bundle of Rights: RDPDDD
1. Reproduction: Right to make copies. Mechanical Royalty
2. Distribution: Sale to the public resulting in transfer of ownership of that copy
3. (public) Performance: Performance Royalty. Collected by PROS, etc.
4. Derivative: Synch Royalty, Sampling.
5. (public) Display. Not as common with music.
6. (public performance of Sound Recording) via DIGITAL AUDIOTRANSMISSION.
3. MBU 2520 Spring 2018 - Eric M. Griffin
.
Most Common Licenses for Different Uses of Music
Permission to use a Copyrighted Work is granted by the Licensor to a Licensee.
1. Mechanical License: Right to Reproduce and Distribute.
Compensation is a statutory royalty.
Mandatory Grant after First Use
2. Performance License: Right to Perform Publicly
Compensation is a statutory royalty.
Mandatory Grant after First Use
3. Synchronization License: Right to use in connection with audiovisual production
Compensation is Negotiable at Market Rates
Completely Discretionary
4. MBU 2520 Spring 2018 - Eric M. Griffin
.
Most Common Licenses for Different Uses of Music
3. Print License: Right to Reproduce and Distribute in Printed Form (Sheet Music)
Compensation is a royalty.
Mandatory Grant after First Use
4. Distribution License: Right to Distribute Copyrighted Work
Compensation is a statutory royalty.
Mandatory Grant after First Use
Section 106 of the Copyright Act outlines these rights. Sections 107 – 120
put limitations on these rights and can be complicated.
5. MBU 2520 Spring 2018 - Eric M. Griffin
.
The Reproduction Right
Section 106(1) Give the Copyright owner the exclusive right to reproduce, or authorize
others to reproduce, the copyrighted work.
Reproduction = Producing a material object of some kind which contains or embodies
the copyrighted work. (Can be readable by machine or device)
2 Categories of material objects = 1) Copies & 2) Phonorecords
(A phonorecord does not include those sounds accompanying a motion picture or other
audiovisual work.)
6. MBU 2520 Spring 2018 - Eric M. Griffin
.
Limitations on Reproduction Right:
1. Compulsory Mechanical License: Gives the Licensee the right to
reproduce and distribute a copyrighted musical work in a
phonorecord.
• First use in the U.S. is reserved for the author or for the author to grant.
• Phonorecords only, not copies
• Non-Dramatic Musical Works only
• Primary purpose of the recording MUST be to distribute for public or private
use
* Cannot be primarily for broadcast or BG music ( like Muzak).
.
7. MBU 2520 Spring 2018 - Eric M. Griffin
.
Compulsory Mechanical License (cont.)
• Can’t change the basic melody or character, but may
change arrangement
• May change genders or other minor changes, but major
changes create a derivative work.
• Must file a Notice of Intention to Obtain a Compulsory
License no later than 30 Days after making the recording
and before distributing it. If you don’t do this, you need a
negotiated license and that’s not compulsory.
8. MBU 2520 Spring 2018 - Eric M. Griffin
.
Compulsory Mechanical License (cont.)
• Must pay royalty for all records made & distributed.
• Current rate set by the Copyright Board = greater of $0.091
or $0.0175/minute
• There are very stringent accounting requirement that must be
met if not using a negotiated license. (Monthly Payments +
Annual Summary) If you fail to pay, you lose the compulsory
license.
• BECAUSE OF ALL THESE RESTRICTIONS, THE
STATUTORY MECHANICAL IS RARELY USED.
9. MBU 2520 Spring 2018 - Eric M. Griffin
USCONSTITUTION - Gives
Congress the power to govern
Copyright Law.
CONGRESS - Enacted the (c)
Act of 1976 which codifies the
laws governing (c)
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS -
Oversees the execution and
functions of the (c) Law.
USCOPYRIGHTOFFICE
COPYRIGHT ROYALTY BOARD
- Board of 3 Copyright Judges
who oversee the setting of
terms and rates for statutory
(c) licenses and make decisions
about distribution of royalties.
10. MBU 2520 Spring 2018 - Eric M. Griffin
.
2. Negotiated Mechanical License
• Used far more frequently than the Statutory Mechanical because
it is far more flexible.
• Often the licensee seeks the license from an agency
representing the owner/publisher, like Harry Fox Agency(HFA).
• May still follow many of the same terms. Often royalties are paid
quarterly and on records sold rather than distributed.
• Allows for a reduced rate to be negotiated if the parties so agree.
*Rates may be reduced for discounted records or especially for
writers subject to a “Controlled Composition Clause.”
11. Controlled Composition Clauses
• A controlled composition is a song that’s written,
owned, or controlled by the artist – in whole or in part.
• It means any song that the artist has an income or other
interest.
• Can apply to songs that producer owns or controls,
too.
12. Controlled Composition Clauses
• A controlled composition clause puts a limit on the amount of
money that the record company has to pay for each controlled
composition.
• Since record companies don’t recoup any costs out of mechanical
royalties, it’s money going out before they break even.They want
to pay as little as possible.
• Artists should fight for mechanicals because it’s the only money
they’ll see for awhile.
13. Controlled Composition Clauses
• Artist only gets artist royalties after they’re recouped; if it doesn’t sell
well, that may never happen.
• Touring, especially early-on, can be a money-losing game. (remember
tour support?)
• Mechanical royalties are a very substantial part of the record deal.
Label wants to limit them, artists want to maximize them.
• .
14. Two Ways to Limit Mechanicals
1. Controlled Composition Clause = Rate per song – record companies
pay 75% of the statutory rate on controlled compositions for most
artists.
*The label “requires” the artist to license the controlled
composition for 75% of the statutory rate.
2. SONG Caps / Rate per album – typically 10 times the single song
rate for each album. (All songs treated as under 5 minutes)
For either of these, New artists can’t do anything, mid-level and superstars can get a little
better rate or an escalation on later albums.
15. Two Ways to Limit Mechanicals
• Noncontrolled Songs - rate limits can be applied to all songs on the
record – not just controlled compositions!
• “Outside songs” – songs that the artist didn’t write; therefore not
controlled compositions. Artist must get publisher to go for the
reduced rate; many times this is impossible.
• Record company takes excess mechanical royalties due outside
writer/publishers out of the artist’s mechanical rates.
16. Effects on Outside Songs
4 Outside Songs on an 8 song album might look like this:
If not enough controlled comp songs to cover it, difference may come
from artist’s record royalties!
17. Song Caps
• Ex. If artist is limited to 10 times 75% of
the statutory rate, to pay outside
publishers the full statutory rate:
• Artist has to take a reduced rate on their
own songs or put less than 10 songs on the
album
• Ex- 5 outside songs and 5 controlled
comps. Remember max per album rate
applies to all songs on the record; not just
controlled comps
18. Multiple Albums / Box Sets
• Multiple Albums – double albums don’t pay double the
allowance on controlled comps. Can get the ten-times
limit raised but it won’t be to twenty.
• Typically, companies only increase the mechanical
royalties in proportion that the wholesale price increases
over that of a single disc album.
• Box set mechanicals are negotiated beforehand.
19. Controlled Comps and Videos
• Promotional usage – record company should get a free promotional
video license. It’s being used to promote the artist’s records.
• Commercial Usage – for home videos, independent publishers not
subject to controlled comp typically get 8 to 15¢ per song.
• Hard for Artists to get anything for home video use.
20. MBU 2520 Spring 2018 - Eric M. Griffin
.
3. Mechanical Licensing Agencies
• Harry Fox Agency – issues mechanical licenses for publishers;
largest in U.S.
• CMRRA – Canadian counterpart to Harry Fox Agency
• These act as publisher’s agent for mechanicals. They issue
mechanical licenses, police them, and report to the publisher
• Harry Fox charges 11.5% of gross monies collected for the
license. (Updated from book. Raised in 2015.)
• CMRRA charges 8%
21. MBU 2520 Spring 2018 - Eric M. Griffin
.
Mechanical Licensing Agencies (cont.)
• Harry Fox Agency Limitations:
• 1. Only covers the U.S.A.
• 2. Does not give right to publish lyrics on album liner notes.
Must receive that from publisher.
22. MBU 2520 Spring 2018 - Eric M. Griffin
.
4. Foreign Mechanical Licensing Agencies
• In many foreign countries the Mechanical is based on the MSRP
or the DPD. How does that change the way copyright owners
are paid for the mechanical right?
23. MBU 2520 Spring 2018 - Eric M. Griffin
.
5. Digital Phonorecord Deliveries
• Downloading still involves reproduction of the musical file.
• The Digital Performance Right Act of 1995 clarified that a digital download
was treated the same as any other phonorecord.
• No royalties required for promotional DPDs of under 30 seconds.
• Ringtones and full song are treated differently. Ringtone mechanical is
$.0.24.
24. MBU 2520 Spring 2018 - Eric M. Griffin
.
Reproduction of Sound Recordings
• SR not protected until 1972 and still recieve lesser protections than other
copyrightable works.
Limitations:
1. Dubbing Limitation: It’s OK to make a cover version that sounds just like a SR as
long as you don’t use the original SR as the source.
2. Home Taping: Accepted though never ruled on definitively by courts.
*Audio Home Recording Act of 1992
A) Awarded a royalty from all blank recording media in order to compensate SR
owners.
B) Set up copy protection standards.
C) Exempts consumers from infringement actions for home copies
*Unintended consequence, AHRA exempt computer hard drives!
(Diamond Rio case)
25. MBU 2520 Spring 2018 - Eric M. Griffin
.
Reproduction of Sound Recordings
Limitations:
3. Sampling: Creating a Derivative Work using part of an Original Work.
Requires permission from both the owner of the Composition & the
Sound Recording.
*If not using the sound recording, it’s a “Replay.”
26. MBU 2520 Spring 2018 - Eric M. Griffin
.
Reproduction of Sound Recordings
Limitations:
Sampling:
MARK RONSON: TED Talk: https://youtu.be/H3TF-hI7zKc (16min)
https://youtu.be/kk6NhjD3Dbg https://youtu.be/YrMmCOaydaM
27. MBU 2520 Spring 2018 - Eric M. Griffin
.
Reproduction of Sound Recordings
Limitations: Sampling (cont).
Possible Defenses:
1. Fair Use: Still infringement, but allowed based on public policy fair use
exceptions like parody, education, etc.
2. De Minimis Use – “too small to be important”
Courts may use a few different approaches.
a) Is it even recognizable? (Rarely successful because, isn’t the point of
a sample for it to be recognizable?
a) Is it “substantially similar? (Generally used test for infringement.)
.
28. MBU 2520 Spring 2018 - Eric M. Griffin
.
Reproduction of Sound Recordings
Limitations: Sampling (cont).
Always best to try to get clearances. Labels often say
in their contracts that the Artist must deliver the music
with all samples cleared. This doesn’t always happen
and a smart label makes sure they are done
themselves.