The document discusses the concept of matriarchy and debates around its definition and existence. It notes that while some animal societies are matriarchal, there are no known examples of human matriarchies in historical sources. Most anthropologists assert that a strictly matriarchal society has never existed. Some societies are considered matrifocal, where the maternal side of the family has greater influence, though there is debate around how to define matrifocality versus matriarchy. The document also briefly discusses matriarchs mentioned in the Bible.
Understanding the real power of good quality gemstones, their appropriate size and the metal to wear them in as well as the right finger for the achievement of the purpose of wearing. Learn the Navagraha mantra for a happy life.
Blockchain with IoT's in the supply chain can make SCM process as easier. Just using the micro IoT's chip to monitor the movement of products and use of blockchain to store the tracking records can provide proper supply chain management. This could also increase product usage and demand.
Blockchain: the solution for transparency in product supply chainsJamie Sandhu
We live in the world we buy into. How brand and supply chain transparency will enable conscious consumerism ethical business practices to thrive and how blockchain technology can make it happen. A summary of the whitepaper by Provenance.org.
Understanding the real power of good quality gemstones, their appropriate size and the metal to wear them in as well as the right finger for the achievement of the purpose of wearing. Learn the Navagraha mantra for a happy life.
Blockchain with IoT's in the supply chain can make SCM process as easier. Just using the micro IoT's chip to monitor the movement of products and use of blockchain to store the tracking records can provide proper supply chain management. This could also increase product usage and demand.
Blockchain: the solution for transparency in product supply chainsJamie Sandhu
We live in the world we buy into. How brand and supply chain transparency will enable conscious consumerism ethical business practices to thrive and how blockchain technology can make it happen. A summary of the whitepaper by Provenance.org.
dText BoxJean-Joseph Goux from Symbolic Economies.docxjacksnathalie
d
Text Box
Jean-Joseph Goux
from Symbolic Economies
8
Women on the Market
The society we know, our own culture, is based
exchange of women. Without the exchange of women, we are
told, we would fall back into the anarchy (?) of the natura]
world, the randomness (?) of the animal kingdom. The passage
into the social order, into the symbolic order, into order as
such, is assured by the fact that men, or groups of men, circu
late women among themselves, according to a rule known as
taboo.
Whatever tammal may take in a given
state of society, its signification has a broader impact. It
assures the foundation of the economic, social,
order that has been ours for centuries.
Why exchange women? Because they are "scarce [commod
ities] . . . essential to the life of the group," the anthropologist
tells us. 1 Why this characteristic of scarcity, given the biological
equilibrium between male and female births? Because the "deep
polygamous tendency, which exists among all men, always
makes the number of available women seem insufficient. Let us
even were as many women as men, these
women would not be equally desirable ... and that, by
definition. . ., the most desirable women must form a
minority. "2
This text was originally published as "Lc marchc des femmes," in Sessualita
e politica, (Milan: Feltrinclli, 1978).
lClaude Levi-Strauss, The Elementary Structures oj Kinship (Les Structures
eUmentaires de La Parmte, 1949, rev. 1967), trans. James Harle Bell, John Rich
ard von Sturmer, and Rodney Needham (Boston, 1969), p. 36.
p.38.
Women on the Market
Are men all equally desirable? Do women have no tendency
toward polygamy? The good anthropologist does not raise such
questions. A fortiori: why are men not objects of exchange
among women? It is because women's bodies-through their
use, consumption, and circulation-provide for
making social life and culture possible, although they remain an
unknown "infrastructure" of the elaboration of that social life
and culture. The exploitation of the matter that has been sexu
female is so integral a part of our sociocultural horizon
is no way to interpret it except within this horizon.
In still other words: all the systems of exchange that organize
patriarchal societies and all the modalities of productive work
that are recognized, valued, and rewarded in these societies are
men's business. The production of women, signs, and com
modities is always referred back to men (when a man buys a
girl, he "pays" the father or the brother, not the mother ... ),
and they always pass from one man to another, from one group
of men to another. The work force is thus always assumed to be
"products" are objects to be used, objects of
r ... "nc·'rr....n among men alone.
Which means that the possibility of our social life, of our
culture, depends upon a ho(m)mo-sexual monopol
that orders our society is the exclusive valorization of men's
needs! desires, of ...
dText BoxMarshall Sahlins, The Spirit of the Gift,”[197.docxsagarlesley
d
Text Box
Marshall Sahlins, “The Spirit of the Gift,”[1972]
d
Text Box
Shoshana Felman [1987]
d
Text Box
Sigmund Freud [1912 original date]
d
Text Box
d
Text Box
Jacques Lacan [1966]
8
Women on the Market
The society we know, our own culture, is based
exchange of women. Without the exchange of women, we are
told, we would fall back into the anarchy (?) of the natura]
world, the randomness (?) of the animal kingdom. The passage
into the social order, into the symbolic order, into order as
such, is assured by the fact that men, or groups of men, circu
late women among themselves, according to a rule known as
taboo.
Whatever tammal may take in a given
state of society, its signification has a broader impact. It
assures the foundation of the economic, social,
order that has been ours for centuries.
Why exchange women? Because they are "scarce [commod
ities] . . . essential to the life of the group," the anthropologist
tells us. 1 Why this characteristic of scarcity, given the biological
equilibrium between male and female births? Because the "deep
polygamous tendency, which exists among all men, always
makes the number of available women seem insufficient. Let us
even were as many women as men, these
women would not be equally desirable ... and that, by
definition. . ., the most desirable women must form a
minority. "2
This text was originally published as "Lc marchc des femmes," in Sessualita
e politica, (Milan: Feltrinclli, 1978).
lClaude Levi-Strauss, The Elementary Structures oj Kinship (Les Structures
eUmentaires de La Parmte, 1949, rev. 1967), trans. James Harle Bell, John Rich
ard von Sturmer, and Rodney Needham (Boston, 1969), p. 36.
p.38.
Women on the Market
Are men all equally desirable? Do women have no tendency
toward polygamy? The good anthropologist does not raise such
questions. A fortiori: why are men not objects of exchange
among women? It is because women's bodies-through their
use, consumption, and circulation-provide for
making social life and culture possible, although they remain an
unknown "infrastructure" of the elaboration of that social life
and culture. The exploitation of the matter that has been sexu
female is so integral a part of our sociocultural horizon
is no way to interpret it except within this horizon.
In still other words: all the systems of exchange that organize
patriarchal societies and all the modalities of productive work
that are recognized, valued, and rewarded in these societies are
men's business. The production of women, signs, and com
modities is always referred back to men (when a man buys a
girl, he "pays" the father or the brother, not the mother ... ),
and they always pass from one man to another, from one group
of men to another. The work force is thus always assumed to be
"products" are objects to be used, objects of
r ... "nc·'rr....n a ...
Patriarchy(CONTINUED!) Why Many People Think Patriar.docxkarlhennesey
Patriarchy
(CONTINUED!)
Why Many People Think Patriarchy is
Inevitable
•God/gods/similar powers made us this way
•Biology/physiology predestined patriarchy
•Women are the “weaker” sex
•Men’s and women’s reproductive capacities shape
their participation in social life
But…Is patriarchy universal?
Nope!
◦Anthropologists have documented cultures in which
gender was not a major organizing system in society
in
Alternatives to patriarchy
oSocial inequalities based on some
trait other than gender (most often
age/seniority, family lineage), or no
inequality
oWomen and men alternate tasks
(including care giving) and share
religious and leadership
responsibilities)
Example: Vanuatu
Melanesian island culture of the Vanatinai is
organized around the principle of personal autonomy
◦No ideology of male superiority
◦No economic exclusion of women
The past wasn’t always more
patriarchal than the present
Many countries were home to more
gender egalitarian cultures in the past
than they are today:
oCleopatra’s Egypt
oThe Amazons (Scythian women)
oNorthern and Western African tribes
pre‐colonial contact
oNative Americans/First Nation
Canadians pre‐conquest
Patriarchy’s many manifestations
Patriarchy can take many different forms and
can operate through many different institutions
Is the expression of patriarchy universal?
• Nope! Patriarchy operates in many different
ways
4/4/2020
1
CORE CONCEPTS IN
GSST
PATRIARCHY
Patriarchy
•A system in which men hold power and are the
central figures in the family, community,
government, and larger society.
•…”A system of social structures and practices in
which men dominate, oppress and exploit
women” (Walby 1990).
4/4/2020
2
Important related concepts
oPower: the capacity to influence the behavior of
other people and/or the course of events
oIn patriarchy, power=power over
oResources: A source of support or aid that can be
drawn on as needed
Important related concepts
See Johnson #2, page 23, in our text
4/4/2020
3
Features of patriarchal societies (Johnson, The
Gender Knot)
◦Male dominance: positions of authority are generally
reserved for men
◦Male centeredness: focus is primarily on men and what
they do
◦Obsession with control (esp. male control): controlling
women and anyone who might threaten male privilege
◦Male identification: core ideas about what is considered
good/desirable/preferable is associated with how we think
about men and masculinity
4/4/2020
4
Susan B. Anthony #17
Male dominance: Judge and complainants men; all
positions of formal power are held by men; as Anthony
notes, all men are her political sovereign
Male centeredness: The law is, in Anthony’s words, “all
made by men, interpreted by men, administered by men,
in favor of men…” (126).
Obsession with control: The law (among other
institutions) is used to silence women, such as by denying
a woman a right to vote
Male identification: Concept of citiz ...
Patriarchy(CONTINUED!) Why Many People Think Patriar.docxrandyburney60861
Patriarchy
(CONTINUED!)
Why Many People Think Patriarchy is
Inevitable
•God/gods/similar powers made us this way
•Biology/physiology predestined patriarchy
•Women are the “weaker” sex
•Men’s and women’s reproductive capacities shape
their participation in social life
But…Is patriarchy universal?
Nope!
◦Anthropologists have documented cultures in which
gender was not a major organizing system in society
in
Alternatives to patriarchy
oSocial inequalities based on some
trait other than gender (most often
age/seniority, family lineage), or no
inequality
oWomen and men alternate tasks
(including care giving) and share
religious and leadership
responsibilities)
Example: Vanuatu
Melanesian island culture of the Vanatinai is
organized around the principle of personal autonomy
◦No ideology of male superiority
◦No economic exclusion of women
The past wasn’t always more
patriarchal than the present
Many countries were home to more
gender egalitarian cultures in the past
than they are today:
oCleopatra’s Egypt
oThe Amazons (Scythian women)
oNorthern and Western African tribes
pre‐colonial contact
oNative Americans/First Nation
Canadians pre‐conquest
Patriarchy’s many manifestations
Patriarchy can take many different forms and
can operate through many different institutions
Is the expression of patriarchy universal?
• Nope! Patriarchy operates in many different
ways
4/4/2020
1
CORE CONCEPTS IN
GSST
PATRIARCHY
Patriarchy
•A system in which men hold power and are the
central figures in the family, community,
government, and larger society.
•…”A system of social structures and practices in
which men dominate, oppress and exploit
women” (Walby 1990).
4/4/2020
2
Important related concepts
oPower: the capacity to influence the behavior of
other people and/or the course of events
oIn patriarchy, power=power over
oResources: A source of support or aid that can be
drawn on as needed
Important related concepts
See Johnson #2, page 23, in our text
4/4/2020
3
Features of patriarchal societies (Johnson, The
Gender Knot)
◦Male dominance: positions of authority are generally
reserved for men
◦Male centeredness: focus is primarily on men and what
they do
◦Obsession with control (esp. male control): controlling
women and anyone who might threaten male privilege
◦Male identification: core ideas about what is considered
good/desirable/preferable is associated with how we think
about men and masculinity
4/4/2020
4
Susan B. Anthony #17
Male dominance: Judge and complainants men; all
positions of formal power are held by men; as Anthony
notes, all men are her political sovereign
Male centeredness: The law is, in Anthony’s words, “all
made by men, interpreted by men, administered by men,
in favor of men…” (126).
Obsession with control: The law (among other
institutions) is used to silence women, such as by denying
a woman a right to vote
Male identification: Concept of citiz.
Patriarchy(CONTINUED!) Why Many People Think Patriarjohniemcm5zt
Patriarchy
(CONTINUED!)
Why Many People Think Patriarchy is
Inevitable
•God/gods/similar powers made us this way
•Biology/physiology predestined patriarchy
•Women are the “weaker” sex
•Men’s and women’s reproductive capacities shape
their participation in social life
But…Is patriarchy universal?
Nope!
◦Anthropologists have documented cultures in which
gender was not a major organizing system in society
in
Alternatives to patriarchy
oSocial inequalities based on some
trait other than gender (most often
age/seniority, family lineage), or no
inequality
oWomen and men alternate tasks
(including care giving) and share
religious and leadership
responsibilities)
Example: Vanuatu
Melanesian island culture of the Vanatinai is
organized around the principle of personal autonomy
◦No ideology of male superiority
◦No economic exclusion of women
The past wasn’t always more
patriarchal than the present
Many countries were home to more
gender egalitarian cultures in the past
than they are today:
oCleopatra’s Egypt
oThe Amazons (Scythian women)
oNorthern and Western African tribes
pre‐colonial contact
oNative Americans/First Nation
Canadians pre‐conquest
Patriarchy’s many manifestations
Patriarchy can take many different forms and
can operate through many different institutions
Is the expression of patriarchy universal?
• Nope! Patriarchy operates in many different
ways
4/4/2020
1
CORE CONCEPTS IN
GSST
PATRIARCHY
Patriarchy
•A system in which men hold power and are the
central figures in the family, community,
government, and larger society.
•…”A system of social structures and practices in
which men dominate, oppress and exploit
women” (Walby 1990).
4/4/2020
2
Important related concepts
oPower: the capacity to influence the behavior of
other people and/or the course of events
oIn patriarchy, power=power over
oResources: A source of support or aid that can be
drawn on as needed
Important related concepts
See Johnson #2, page 23, in our text
4/4/2020
3
Features of patriarchal societies (Johnson, The
Gender Knot)
◦Male dominance: positions of authority are generally
reserved for men
◦Male centeredness: focus is primarily on men and what
they do
◦Obsession with control (esp. male control): controlling
women and anyone who might threaten male privilege
◦Male identification: core ideas about what is considered
good/desirable/preferable is associated with how we think
about men and masculinity
4/4/2020
4
Susan B. Anthony #17
Male dominance: Judge and complainants men; all
positions of formal power are held by men; as Anthony
notes, all men are her political sovereign
Male centeredness: The law is, in Anthony’s words, “all
made by men, interpreted by men, administered by men,
in favor of men…” (126).
Obsession with control: The law (among other
institutions) is used to silence women, such as by denying
a woman a right to vote
Male identification: Concept of citiz ...
The Evolving Nature of Mother-Representations Across the Waves of FeminismMehranMouzam
Whether they’ve occupied the foreground or the background of literary works, mothers as primary subjects or as their shadows - have forever been weaved into the vital, in stories told either about them and/or, about their children. Motherhood and the matrifocal narrative, on the whole, have undergone various conceptual reconstructions that have been both a direct and indirect result of the different waves of feminism across the globe. Feminist concerns over ideas of motherhood and their related representations in literary texts, popular culture, and media, etc. have sought to understand the dichotomy between biological ideas of being a mother and its social and cultural constructions, which essentially shape the gendered expectations of mothers, especially because such socio-cultural constructions carry the cis-gendered heteronormative expectation of what it necessarily means to be a ‘socially accepted’ mother. The ''maternal'' representations in literature and other artistic mediums have evolved to accommodate the ever-changing, dynamism that the term ''mother'' brings forth. The mother figure is no longer only nurturing, ever-suffering and sappy but also loud, angry, and articulate.
dText BoxJean-Joseph Goux from Symbolic Economies.docxjacksnathalie
d
Text Box
Jean-Joseph Goux
from Symbolic Economies
8
Women on the Market
The society we know, our own culture, is based
exchange of women. Without the exchange of women, we are
told, we would fall back into the anarchy (?) of the natura]
world, the randomness (?) of the animal kingdom. The passage
into the social order, into the symbolic order, into order as
such, is assured by the fact that men, or groups of men, circu
late women among themselves, according to a rule known as
taboo.
Whatever tammal may take in a given
state of society, its signification has a broader impact. It
assures the foundation of the economic, social,
order that has been ours for centuries.
Why exchange women? Because they are "scarce [commod
ities] . . . essential to the life of the group," the anthropologist
tells us. 1 Why this characteristic of scarcity, given the biological
equilibrium between male and female births? Because the "deep
polygamous tendency, which exists among all men, always
makes the number of available women seem insufficient. Let us
even were as many women as men, these
women would not be equally desirable ... and that, by
definition. . ., the most desirable women must form a
minority. "2
This text was originally published as "Lc marchc des femmes," in Sessualita
e politica, (Milan: Feltrinclli, 1978).
lClaude Levi-Strauss, The Elementary Structures oj Kinship (Les Structures
eUmentaires de La Parmte, 1949, rev. 1967), trans. James Harle Bell, John Rich
ard von Sturmer, and Rodney Needham (Boston, 1969), p. 36.
p.38.
Women on the Market
Are men all equally desirable? Do women have no tendency
toward polygamy? The good anthropologist does not raise such
questions. A fortiori: why are men not objects of exchange
among women? It is because women's bodies-through their
use, consumption, and circulation-provide for
making social life and culture possible, although they remain an
unknown "infrastructure" of the elaboration of that social life
and culture. The exploitation of the matter that has been sexu
female is so integral a part of our sociocultural horizon
is no way to interpret it except within this horizon.
In still other words: all the systems of exchange that organize
patriarchal societies and all the modalities of productive work
that are recognized, valued, and rewarded in these societies are
men's business. The production of women, signs, and com
modities is always referred back to men (when a man buys a
girl, he "pays" the father or the brother, not the mother ... ),
and they always pass from one man to another, from one group
of men to another. The work force is thus always assumed to be
"products" are objects to be used, objects of
r ... "nc·'rr....n among men alone.
Which means that the possibility of our social life, of our
culture, depends upon a ho(m)mo-sexual monopol
that orders our society is the exclusive valorization of men's
needs! desires, of ...
dText BoxMarshall Sahlins, The Spirit of the Gift,”[197.docxsagarlesley
d
Text Box
Marshall Sahlins, “The Spirit of the Gift,”[1972]
d
Text Box
Shoshana Felman [1987]
d
Text Box
Sigmund Freud [1912 original date]
d
Text Box
d
Text Box
Jacques Lacan [1966]
8
Women on the Market
The society we know, our own culture, is based
exchange of women. Without the exchange of women, we are
told, we would fall back into the anarchy (?) of the natura]
world, the randomness (?) of the animal kingdom. The passage
into the social order, into the symbolic order, into order as
such, is assured by the fact that men, or groups of men, circu
late women among themselves, according to a rule known as
taboo.
Whatever tammal may take in a given
state of society, its signification has a broader impact. It
assures the foundation of the economic, social,
order that has been ours for centuries.
Why exchange women? Because they are "scarce [commod
ities] . . . essential to the life of the group," the anthropologist
tells us. 1 Why this characteristic of scarcity, given the biological
equilibrium between male and female births? Because the "deep
polygamous tendency, which exists among all men, always
makes the number of available women seem insufficient. Let us
even were as many women as men, these
women would not be equally desirable ... and that, by
definition. . ., the most desirable women must form a
minority. "2
This text was originally published as "Lc marchc des femmes," in Sessualita
e politica, (Milan: Feltrinclli, 1978).
lClaude Levi-Strauss, The Elementary Structures oj Kinship (Les Structures
eUmentaires de La Parmte, 1949, rev. 1967), trans. James Harle Bell, John Rich
ard von Sturmer, and Rodney Needham (Boston, 1969), p. 36.
p.38.
Women on the Market
Are men all equally desirable? Do women have no tendency
toward polygamy? The good anthropologist does not raise such
questions. A fortiori: why are men not objects of exchange
among women? It is because women's bodies-through their
use, consumption, and circulation-provide for
making social life and culture possible, although they remain an
unknown "infrastructure" of the elaboration of that social life
and culture. The exploitation of the matter that has been sexu
female is so integral a part of our sociocultural horizon
is no way to interpret it except within this horizon.
In still other words: all the systems of exchange that organize
patriarchal societies and all the modalities of productive work
that are recognized, valued, and rewarded in these societies are
men's business. The production of women, signs, and com
modities is always referred back to men (when a man buys a
girl, he "pays" the father or the brother, not the mother ... ),
and they always pass from one man to another, from one group
of men to another. The work force is thus always assumed to be
"products" are objects to be used, objects of
r ... "nc·'rr....n a ...
Patriarchy(CONTINUED!) Why Many People Think Patriar.docxkarlhennesey
Patriarchy
(CONTINUED!)
Why Many People Think Patriarchy is
Inevitable
•God/gods/similar powers made us this way
•Biology/physiology predestined patriarchy
•Women are the “weaker” sex
•Men’s and women’s reproductive capacities shape
their participation in social life
But…Is patriarchy universal?
Nope!
◦Anthropologists have documented cultures in which
gender was not a major organizing system in society
in
Alternatives to patriarchy
oSocial inequalities based on some
trait other than gender (most often
age/seniority, family lineage), or no
inequality
oWomen and men alternate tasks
(including care giving) and share
religious and leadership
responsibilities)
Example: Vanuatu
Melanesian island culture of the Vanatinai is
organized around the principle of personal autonomy
◦No ideology of male superiority
◦No economic exclusion of women
The past wasn’t always more
patriarchal than the present
Many countries were home to more
gender egalitarian cultures in the past
than they are today:
oCleopatra’s Egypt
oThe Amazons (Scythian women)
oNorthern and Western African tribes
pre‐colonial contact
oNative Americans/First Nation
Canadians pre‐conquest
Patriarchy’s many manifestations
Patriarchy can take many different forms and
can operate through many different institutions
Is the expression of patriarchy universal?
• Nope! Patriarchy operates in many different
ways
4/4/2020
1
CORE CONCEPTS IN
GSST
PATRIARCHY
Patriarchy
•A system in which men hold power and are the
central figures in the family, community,
government, and larger society.
•…”A system of social structures and practices in
which men dominate, oppress and exploit
women” (Walby 1990).
4/4/2020
2
Important related concepts
oPower: the capacity to influence the behavior of
other people and/or the course of events
oIn patriarchy, power=power over
oResources: A source of support or aid that can be
drawn on as needed
Important related concepts
See Johnson #2, page 23, in our text
4/4/2020
3
Features of patriarchal societies (Johnson, The
Gender Knot)
◦Male dominance: positions of authority are generally
reserved for men
◦Male centeredness: focus is primarily on men and what
they do
◦Obsession with control (esp. male control): controlling
women and anyone who might threaten male privilege
◦Male identification: core ideas about what is considered
good/desirable/preferable is associated with how we think
about men and masculinity
4/4/2020
4
Susan B. Anthony #17
Male dominance: Judge and complainants men; all
positions of formal power are held by men; as Anthony
notes, all men are her political sovereign
Male centeredness: The law is, in Anthony’s words, “all
made by men, interpreted by men, administered by men,
in favor of men…” (126).
Obsession with control: The law (among other
institutions) is used to silence women, such as by denying
a woman a right to vote
Male identification: Concept of citiz ...
Patriarchy(CONTINUED!) Why Many People Think Patriar.docxrandyburney60861
Patriarchy
(CONTINUED!)
Why Many People Think Patriarchy is
Inevitable
•God/gods/similar powers made us this way
•Biology/physiology predestined patriarchy
•Women are the “weaker” sex
•Men’s and women’s reproductive capacities shape
their participation in social life
But…Is patriarchy universal?
Nope!
◦Anthropologists have documented cultures in which
gender was not a major organizing system in society
in
Alternatives to patriarchy
oSocial inequalities based on some
trait other than gender (most often
age/seniority, family lineage), or no
inequality
oWomen and men alternate tasks
(including care giving) and share
religious and leadership
responsibilities)
Example: Vanuatu
Melanesian island culture of the Vanatinai is
organized around the principle of personal autonomy
◦No ideology of male superiority
◦No economic exclusion of women
The past wasn’t always more
patriarchal than the present
Many countries were home to more
gender egalitarian cultures in the past
than they are today:
oCleopatra’s Egypt
oThe Amazons (Scythian women)
oNorthern and Western African tribes
pre‐colonial contact
oNative Americans/First Nation
Canadians pre‐conquest
Patriarchy’s many manifestations
Patriarchy can take many different forms and
can operate through many different institutions
Is the expression of patriarchy universal?
• Nope! Patriarchy operates in many different
ways
4/4/2020
1
CORE CONCEPTS IN
GSST
PATRIARCHY
Patriarchy
•A system in which men hold power and are the
central figures in the family, community,
government, and larger society.
•…”A system of social structures and practices in
which men dominate, oppress and exploit
women” (Walby 1990).
4/4/2020
2
Important related concepts
oPower: the capacity to influence the behavior of
other people and/or the course of events
oIn patriarchy, power=power over
oResources: A source of support or aid that can be
drawn on as needed
Important related concepts
See Johnson #2, page 23, in our text
4/4/2020
3
Features of patriarchal societies (Johnson, The
Gender Knot)
◦Male dominance: positions of authority are generally
reserved for men
◦Male centeredness: focus is primarily on men and what
they do
◦Obsession with control (esp. male control): controlling
women and anyone who might threaten male privilege
◦Male identification: core ideas about what is considered
good/desirable/preferable is associated with how we think
about men and masculinity
4/4/2020
4
Susan B. Anthony #17
Male dominance: Judge and complainants men; all
positions of formal power are held by men; as Anthony
notes, all men are her political sovereign
Male centeredness: The law is, in Anthony’s words, “all
made by men, interpreted by men, administered by men,
in favor of men…” (126).
Obsession with control: The law (among other
institutions) is used to silence women, such as by denying
a woman a right to vote
Male identification: Concept of citiz.
Patriarchy(CONTINUED!) Why Many People Think Patriarjohniemcm5zt
Patriarchy
(CONTINUED!)
Why Many People Think Patriarchy is
Inevitable
•God/gods/similar powers made us this way
•Biology/physiology predestined patriarchy
•Women are the “weaker” sex
•Men’s and women’s reproductive capacities shape
their participation in social life
But…Is patriarchy universal?
Nope!
◦Anthropologists have documented cultures in which
gender was not a major organizing system in society
in
Alternatives to patriarchy
oSocial inequalities based on some
trait other than gender (most often
age/seniority, family lineage), or no
inequality
oWomen and men alternate tasks
(including care giving) and share
religious and leadership
responsibilities)
Example: Vanuatu
Melanesian island culture of the Vanatinai is
organized around the principle of personal autonomy
◦No ideology of male superiority
◦No economic exclusion of women
The past wasn’t always more
patriarchal than the present
Many countries were home to more
gender egalitarian cultures in the past
than they are today:
oCleopatra’s Egypt
oThe Amazons (Scythian women)
oNorthern and Western African tribes
pre‐colonial contact
oNative Americans/First Nation
Canadians pre‐conquest
Patriarchy’s many manifestations
Patriarchy can take many different forms and
can operate through many different institutions
Is the expression of patriarchy universal?
• Nope! Patriarchy operates in many different
ways
4/4/2020
1
CORE CONCEPTS IN
GSST
PATRIARCHY
Patriarchy
•A system in which men hold power and are the
central figures in the family, community,
government, and larger society.
•…”A system of social structures and practices in
which men dominate, oppress and exploit
women” (Walby 1990).
4/4/2020
2
Important related concepts
oPower: the capacity to influence the behavior of
other people and/or the course of events
oIn patriarchy, power=power over
oResources: A source of support or aid that can be
drawn on as needed
Important related concepts
See Johnson #2, page 23, in our text
4/4/2020
3
Features of patriarchal societies (Johnson, The
Gender Knot)
◦Male dominance: positions of authority are generally
reserved for men
◦Male centeredness: focus is primarily on men and what
they do
◦Obsession with control (esp. male control): controlling
women and anyone who might threaten male privilege
◦Male identification: core ideas about what is considered
good/desirable/preferable is associated with how we think
about men and masculinity
4/4/2020
4
Susan B. Anthony #17
Male dominance: Judge and complainants men; all
positions of formal power are held by men; as Anthony
notes, all men are her political sovereign
Male centeredness: The law is, in Anthony’s words, “all
made by men, interpreted by men, administered by men,
in favor of men…” (126).
Obsession with control: The law (among other
institutions) is used to silence women, such as by denying
a woman a right to vote
Male identification: Concept of citiz ...
The Evolving Nature of Mother-Representations Across the Waves of FeminismMehranMouzam
Whether they’ve occupied the foreground or the background of literary works, mothers as primary subjects or as their shadows - have forever been weaved into the vital, in stories told either about them and/or, about their children. Motherhood and the matrifocal narrative, on the whole, have undergone various conceptual reconstructions that have been both a direct and indirect result of the different waves of feminism across the globe. Feminist concerns over ideas of motherhood and their related representations in literary texts, popular culture, and media, etc. have sought to understand the dichotomy between biological ideas of being a mother and its social and cultural constructions, which essentially shape the gendered expectations of mothers, especially because such socio-cultural constructions carry the cis-gendered heteronormative expectation of what it necessarily means to be a ‘socially accepted’ mother. The ''maternal'' representations in literature and other artistic mediums have evolved to accommodate the ever-changing, dynamism that the term ''mother'' brings forth. The mother figure is no longer only nurturing, ever-suffering and sappy but also loud, angry, and articulate.
1. The Meaning of Matriarch
Matriarchy: is a term, which is applied to gynocentric form of society,
in which the leading role is by the female and especially by the
mothers of a community. Some authors consider it as a hypothetical
form of human society. There exist many matriarchal animal societies
including bees, elephants, and killer whales. The word matriarchy is
coined as the opposite of patriarchy, from Greek matēr "mother" and
archein "to rule". Gynecocracy (γυναικοκρατία) is sometimes used
synonymously.
While there are many existing matrilinear and matrilocal societies,
such as those of the Minangkabau or Mosuo, no matriarchal societies
are known in historical sources, and hypothetical prehistoric
matriarchy has been discredited. However, strongly matrilocal
societies are sometimes referred to as matrifocal, and there is still
some debate concerning the terminological delineation between
matrifocality and matriarchy.
Most modern anthropologists and sociologists assert that there are no
known examples of human matriarchies from any point in history,[2]
[3][4][5][6][7] and Encyclopedia Britannica describes their views as
"consensus", listing matriarchy as a hypothetical social system.[8]
Some examples of matrifocal societies, however, are known to exist.
The Britannica article goes on to note, "The view of matriarchy as
constituting a stage of cultural development is now generally
discredited. Furthermore, the consensus among modern
anthropologists and sociologists is that a strictly matriarchal society
never existed."[9] For more information see the appendix Patriarchies
in dispute.
There is also dispute about matrifocality (see Matriarchy vs.
matrifocality). Matriarchy is defined by some as distinct from
matrilocality, which some anthropologists use to describe societies
where the maternal side of the family manages domestic relations,
owing to the husband joining the wife's family, rather than the wife
moving to the husband's village or tribe. If, additionally, family
property passes down the maternal line (matrilineality), the wife is
effectively supported by her extended family, especially her brothers,
these maternal uncles serving children of the couple as "social
fathers", while the husbands tend to be more isolated.
2. Matriarchs of the Bible
The Matriarchs (Hebrew, Imahot; "mothers") are four important
women mentioned in the Book of Genesis of the Hebrew Bible, the
wives of the Biblical Patriarchs. They are:
• Eve, Wife of Adam;
• Ruth, wife of Boaz;
• Sarah, wife of Abraham;
• Rebecca, wife of Isaac;
• Leah and Rachel, the wives of Jacob.
They are considered to be the ancestral "mothers" of the ancient
Children of Israel as well as of the Jewish people Thus classical
Judaism considers itself to have three male Patriarchs and four
mothers