2. serum albumin (BSA) to calculate the unknown concentrations
of p-nitrophenol or protein.
Statistical Analysis
A two tailed student’s t-test was performed to determine
statistical significance, using the programming language R.
The results were plotted using Graph Pad and samples were
considered significant with a p value ≤ 0.05.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The results of nanoparticle surface chemistry
characterization are summarized in Tables 1-4. The particle
size measurements showed a dramatic decrease in nanoparticle
size following in vitro digestion (Tables 1 and 2). The
measured zeta potential showed a minimal change in
magnitude; both the SiO2 and TiO2 nanoparticles measured
around -25 mV before and after the digestion process. These
results are shown below in Tables 3 and 4.
TABLE 1 - THE PARTICLE SIZE OF SiO2 BEFORE AND AFTER IN VITRO DIGESTION
TABLE 2 - THE PARTICLE SIZE OF TiO2 BEFORE AND AFTER IN VITRO DIGESTION
TABLE 3 - THE RESULTS OF THE ZETA POTENTIAL FOR SiO2 BEFORE AND AFTER IN
VITRO DIGESTION
TABLE 4 - THE RESULTS OF THE ZETA POTENTIAL FOR TiO2 BEFORE AND AFTER IN
VITRO DIGESTION
The purpose of the Alkaline Phosphatase Activity Assay
was to determine how nanoparticle ingestion affects the small
intestinal alkaline phosphatase activity. Alkaline phosphatase
is an enzyme that is responsible for the proper breakdown and
absorption of nutrients, such as proteins, lipids, and
carbohydrates, in the body [5]. Dividing the results of the ALP
assay by the Bradford assay yields milligrams of p-nitrophenol
per milligram of protein. For the control group a value of 6.76
mg of p-nitrophenol per mg of protein was obtained. For the
cells exposed to TiO2, an increased value of 7.9 mg of p-
nitrophenol per mg of protein was obtained. This data was
plotted in a bar chart and can be seen below in Figure 1. A p-
value of 0.05 was obtained after running a t-test to statistically
compare the results using the programming language R. Thus,
results showed a slight statistical difference in the mg of p-
nitrophenol per mg of protein, and a minimal effect on the
alkaline phosphatase activity.
Figure 1- The results of the Alkaline Phosphatase Assay and Bradford Assays
to measure alkaline phosphatase activity. Results show average ± SEM, n = 8.
CONCLUSION
It has been shown that with digestion, nanoparticle
aggregates decrease dramatically in size. Zeta potential
showed relatively no change after the nanoparticles were put
through the in vitro digestion process. It was also shown that
cell exposure to nanoparticles minimally increases the amount
of alkaline phosphatase activity, which could indicate an
alteration of intestinal function due to nanoparticle exposure.
Future work includes testing the effects of SiO2 on ALP
activity, and subjecting the nanoparticles to in vitro digestion
before exposing them to cells.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Funding for this work was provided by the S3IP
Undergraduate Research Initiatives Award and the National
Institutes of Health (1R15ES022828)
REFERENCES
[1] Chaudhry, Q et al. “Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for
the food sector,” Trends Biotechnol., pp. 7,27,82. 2008
[2] A. Weir, P. Westerhoff, L. Fabricius, N. von Goetz, “Titanium Dioxide
Nanoparticles in Food and Personal Care Products,” Environ Sci Technology,
2012 February 21; 46(4): 2242-2250
[3] Lomer, MCE, Thompson, RPH & Powell, JJ. “Fine and ultrafine particles
of the diet: Influence on the mucosal immune response and association with
Crohn's disease.” P Nutr Soc 61, 123-130, (2002).
[4] Glahn RP, Lee OA, Yeung A, Goldman MI, Miller DD. “Caco-2 cell
ferritin formation predicts nonradiolabeled food iron availability in an in vitro
digestion Caco-2 cell culture model.” Journal of Nutrition, pp. 128(9):1555-
1561, 1998
[5] Jean-Paul Lalles, “Intestinal alkaline phosphatase: multiple biological
roles in maintenance of intestinal homeostasis and modulation by diet,”
Nutrition Reviews, Vol. 68(6):323-332, 2010.
SiO2 Size Before Digestion (nm) After Digestion (nm)
Concentration H20 PBS DMEM Average ± SEM
High 4016 4410 4916 604.65 ± 11.6
Mid 1025 1389 1360 615.45 ± 15.5
TiO2 Size Before Digestion (nm) After Digestion (nm)
Concentration H20 PBS DMEM Average ± SEM
High 706.7 2624 146 625.8 ± 19.7
Mid 435.1 686.5 977.53 644.95 ± 24.5
SiO2 Zeta Potential Before
Digestion (mV)
After Digestion (mV)
Concentration H2O PBS DMEM Average ± SEM
High -45.2 -20.7 -33.9 -26.9 ± 1.1
Mid -35.1 -27.6 -19.4 -28.7 ± 3.7
TiO2 Zeta Potential Before
Digestion (mV)
After Digestion (mV)
Concentration H2O PBS DMEM Average ± SEM
High 38.8 -28.6 -7.56 -27.45 ± 1.75
Mid 28 -20.3 -14.8 -29.75 ± 0.15