For information for all. We need one strong working effective anti corruption rule like developed countries as US, UK also UN. Lokpal or anyother, but has to be there
The document discusses various views presented by Team Anna and the Government on the provisions of the Lokpal Bill. Key points of debate include whether the Prime Minister and other public servants should come under the Lokpal's jurisdiction, the selection process of Lokpal members, the powers and accountability of the Lokpal, and the punishment for corruption. Both sides raise concerns about maintaining the independence of institutions and the Lokpal not becoming an overreaching authority.
The document discusses the evolution of anti-corruption laws in India from the Indian Penal Code of 1862 to the current Prevention of Corruption Act of 1988. It provides details on:
1) How the IPC initially dealt with offenses related to corruption of public servants in Sections 161-165.
2) The introduction of the first Prevention of Corruption Act in 1947 to make more effective provisions against bribery and corruption.
3) The consolidation and repeal of previous laws through the Prevention of Corruption Act of 1988, which defined new offenses and punishments related to corruption.
4) An overview of key sections of the 1988 Act related to offenses of public servants taking bribes, abet
Chartered Secretary - The Black Money Act - is It a PanaceaSudipto Banerjee
The article analyzes India's Black Money Act, which came into effect on July 1, 2015. Some key points:
- The Act taxes undisclosed foreign assets and income of resident Indian citizens at 30% and also imposes severe criminal penalties for tax evasion.
- It allows for a one-time compliance window until December 2015 for declaring foreign assets with a penalty of paying the tax due plus a 100% penalty.
- Significantly, the Act defines willful attempt to evade tax as a "predicate offense" under India's anti-money laundering law, allowing tax authorities and the Enforcement Directorate to investigate cases jointly.
- This is aimed at enabling India to seek more cooperation from
The Jan Lokpal Bill aims to establish independent anti-corruption bodies called Jan Lokpal at the central level and Jan Lokayukta at the state level. The bill seeks to give these bodies powers to investigate and prosecute cases of corruption against public servants, politicians, and bureaucrats. It also outlines an independent and transparent selection process for the members and leadership of Jan Lokpal. However, the government's version of the bill excludes powers over judiciary, does not cover the Prime Minister, and retains more control over the anti-corruption bodies. Overall, the Jan Lokpal Bill envisions stronger anti-corruption mechanisms than the government's bill, but its actual impact will depend on proper implementation.
The document discusses the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Bill, 2018 in India. Key points:
1. The bill amends the Prevention of Corruption Act of 1988 to strengthen anti-corruption laws.
2. It expands the definition of bribery, criminalizes gifts given with undue influence, and makes both bribe giving and taking punishable offenses.
3. The amendments also aim to prevent delays in corruption cases, mandate timely trials, and allow for immediate attachment of illegal assets from public servants found guilty of corruption.
Principle of prevention of corruption and anti corruption regulatory framewor...DrShamsulArefin
The document provides an overview of anti-corruption principles and regulatory framework in Bangladesh. It discusses the historical background of anti-corruption efforts in Bangladesh dating back to British rule. It outlines the key acts and policies related to anti-corruption in Bangladesh including the Anti-Corruption Commission Act of 2004, Prevention of Corruption Act of 1947, and Bangladesh's ratification of the UN Convention Against Corruption. It also summarizes some of the Anti-Corruption Commission's initiatives and functions to investigate corruption cases and prevent illicit wealth.
The document discusses various views presented by Team Anna and the Government on the provisions of the Lokpal Bill. Key points of debate include whether the Prime Minister and other public servants should come under the Lokpal's jurisdiction, the selection process of Lokpal members, the powers and accountability of the Lokpal, and the punishment for corruption. Both sides raise concerns about maintaining the independence of institutions and the Lokpal not becoming an overreaching authority.
The document discusses the evolution of anti-corruption laws in India from the Indian Penal Code of 1862 to the current Prevention of Corruption Act of 1988. It provides details on:
1) How the IPC initially dealt with offenses related to corruption of public servants in Sections 161-165.
2) The introduction of the first Prevention of Corruption Act in 1947 to make more effective provisions against bribery and corruption.
3) The consolidation and repeal of previous laws through the Prevention of Corruption Act of 1988, which defined new offenses and punishments related to corruption.
4) An overview of key sections of the 1988 Act related to offenses of public servants taking bribes, abet
Chartered Secretary - The Black Money Act - is It a PanaceaSudipto Banerjee
The article analyzes India's Black Money Act, which came into effect on July 1, 2015. Some key points:
- The Act taxes undisclosed foreign assets and income of resident Indian citizens at 30% and also imposes severe criminal penalties for tax evasion.
- It allows for a one-time compliance window until December 2015 for declaring foreign assets with a penalty of paying the tax due plus a 100% penalty.
- Significantly, the Act defines willful attempt to evade tax as a "predicate offense" under India's anti-money laundering law, allowing tax authorities and the Enforcement Directorate to investigate cases jointly.
- This is aimed at enabling India to seek more cooperation from
The Jan Lokpal Bill aims to establish independent anti-corruption bodies called Jan Lokpal at the central level and Jan Lokayukta at the state level. The bill seeks to give these bodies powers to investigate and prosecute cases of corruption against public servants, politicians, and bureaucrats. It also outlines an independent and transparent selection process for the members and leadership of Jan Lokpal. However, the government's version of the bill excludes powers over judiciary, does not cover the Prime Minister, and retains more control over the anti-corruption bodies. Overall, the Jan Lokpal Bill envisions stronger anti-corruption mechanisms than the government's bill, but its actual impact will depend on proper implementation.
The document discusses the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Bill, 2018 in India. Key points:
1. The bill amends the Prevention of Corruption Act of 1988 to strengthen anti-corruption laws.
2. It expands the definition of bribery, criminalizes gifts given with undue influence, and makes both bribe giving and taking punishable offenses.
3. The amendments also aim to prevent delays in corruption cases, mandate timely trials, and allow for immediate attachment of illegal assets from public servants found guilty of corruption.
Principle of prevention of corruption and anti corruption regulatory framewor...DrShamsulArefin
The document provides an overview of anti-corruption principles and regulatory framework in Bangladesh. It discusses the historical background of anti-corruption efforts in Bangladesh dating back to British rule. It outlines the key acts and policies related to anti-corruption in Bangladesh including the Anti-Corruption Commission Act of 2004, Prevention of Corruption Act of 1947, and Bangladesh's ratification of the UN Convention Against Corruption. It also summarizes some of the Anti-Corruption Commission's initiatives and functions to investigate corruption cases and prevent illicit wealth.
The document discusses the concept of sanction for prosecution under Indian law. It provides definitions for key terms like public servant and discusses the legal provisions around sanction requirements. Some main points:
- Sanction is required before prosecuting a public servant to prevent vexatious/frivolous cases and protect the innocent.
- The Prevention of Corruption Act and Code of Criminal Procedure contain sanction provisions for prosecuting public servants.
- A public servant is broadly defined and can include government employees, elected officials, and others. Ministers and the Chief Minister are considered public servants.
- Sanction is typically granted by the authority that appointed the public servant, but the Governor has power to grant sanction for prosecuting
The document summarizes the evolution of anti-corruption laws in India. It discusses how the Indian Penal Code of 1862 was supplemented by the Prevention of Corruption Act of 1947 to define criminal misconduct. The PC Act was further expanded in 1988 and recently amended in 2018. The key amendments in 2018 include narrowing the definition of criminal misconduct, introducing time limits for trial completion, and provisions targeting bribery by commercial organizations.
This document provides an overview and summary of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 in India. It discusses how the Act aims to curb corruption among public servants by defining criminal offenses and associated penalties. Key points include:
- The Act consolidated previous anti-corruption laws and expanded the definition of a "public servant." It created special courts to try corruption cases.
- Offenses under the Act include a public servant accepting bribes, obtaining pecuniary advantages through abuse of power, or possessing disproportionate assets. Penalties include minimum six month imprisonment.
- The Act also includes presumptions of guilt that shift the burden of proof to the accused public servant in some cases. Investigation of offenses can be done
This document discusses combating corruption in Bangladesh and the role of civil servants. It begins with an overview of the Anti-Corruption Commission of Bangladesh, including its historical development, mission, organizational structure, and powers. It then discusses definitions of corruption, types of corruption, consequences of corruption, and roles civil servants can play in reducing corruption through transparency, accountability, and upholding the rule of law. Specific corruption issues in Bangladesh like nepotism and bribery in various sectors are also examined.
Corruption could be an important obstacle to business in Pakistan, and firms ought to expect to frequently encounter felony or different corrupt practices. Corruption is rampant altogether sectors and establishments.
The document summarizes the key aspects of the UK Bribery Act of 2010, which introduced stricter laws against bribery. It outlines the four main offences under the Act: 1) offering bribes, 2) accepting bribes, 3) bribing foreign officials, and 4) failure of companies to prevent bribery. It also discusses the penalties for violating these offences, which include imprisonment of up to 10 years and unlimited fines for individuals and companies. Finally, it argues that Bangladesh should introduce similar anti-bribery laws to penalize bribe payers and ensure companies have adequate procedures to prevent bribery.
This document defines the crime of plunder under Republic Act No. 7080. Plunder is defined as any public officer who amasses ill-gotten wealth of at least 50 million pesos through a combination of acts like misappropriation of public funds, receiving kickbacks, or taking advantage of their position. Any person who participates with the public officer in committing acts contributing to plunder will also be punished. If convicted, the public officer will lose all retirement benefits and all ill-gotten wealth will be forfeited to the state.
The Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act defines corrupt practices for public officers and private individuals interacting with the government. It prohibits receiving gifts in relation to contracts, employment with private entities under certain circumstances, undisclosed conflicts of interest, and unexplained wealth disproportionate to salary. Violations are punishable by imprisonment, fines, and forfeiture of property. Public officers must also file annual statements disclosing their assets, liabilities, income and taxes.
The document discusses the need to reform the Indian police system. It notes that while citizens expect the police to protect them, the current image of the police is that of being corrupt and colluding with criminals. There are issues with the police selection process, lack of accountability to the public, inadequate training, and lack of modernization. The document advocates for making the police independent of political interference, improving recruitment, training, and making the complaint system more accessible. Overall reforms are needed to make the police more citizen-centric and accountable.
This document discusses money laundering in Malaysia. It begins by listing some student names and defining money laundering as disguising illegally obtained money to make it appear legitimate. It then provides details on Malaysia's anti-money laundering laws, noting that money laundering is punishable by up to 15 years in prison and fines of at least 5 times the value of the unlawful funds. The document also states that Malaysia was at medium risk for money laundering from 2013 to 2017 according to statistics and identifies weaknesses in financial procedures and controls as contributing factors.
This document discusses ethics and accountability in the Philippine public sector. It outlines the legal and constitutional frameworks that establish ethical standards for public officials, such as the Code of Conduct and Anti-Graft laws. It also describes the oversight institutions that enforce these standards, including the Civil Service Commission, Office of the Ombudsman, and Commission on Audit. Additionally, it discusses how political commitment, an active citizenry that provides feedback, and initiatives to promote ethics help reinforce ethics and accountability in the Philippine government.
This document discusses accountability, anti-corruption measures, and their impact on public administration. It provides:
1) A historical background of anti-corruption commissions in Bangladesh, from their origins under British rule to the establishment of the Anti-Corruption Commission in 2004.
2) An overview of the Anti-Corruption Commission of Bangladesh, including its structure, functions, and powers to investigate corruption cases and require officials to declare their assets.
3) A discussion of transparency and accountability measures that can be used to prevent corruption, such as open integrity policies, transparency in decision-making, and strong oversight and enforcement.
Texas Department of Public Safety - New Traffic, Criminal Laws Set To Go Into...Ken Brand
Subject: New Texas Traffic Laws - 9/1/09 – See Attachment
I wanted you to be aware that new traffic laws will be take effect September 1, 2009 in Texas. Here are some you should be aware of, but please take a look at the attached document from the Texas Department of Public Safety for more details.
1. Teen Drivers: Effective September 1, 2009, the laws for teenage drivers are getting tougher. Drivers younger than 18 are banned from using cell phones while driving (dialing, talking, texting) and total hours of behind-the-wheel driving instruction a teen receives is increasing from 14 to 34 before getting a license.
2. Driving in a School Zone: Effective September 1, 2009, the use of a wireless device within a reduced-speed school zone is prohibited. Cellular phones may be used while the vehicle is stopped in a school zone or with a hands-free device. The law also applies to bus drivers. Violators are subject to a fine of up to $200. Note: Cities or counties wanting to enforce this law must post a sign at the beginning of each school zone to inform drivers that using a wireless communications device is prohibited and the operator is subject to a fine. THE SIGNS ARE UP IN SOME AREAS!
3. Seat Belts: Effective September 1, 2009, all occupants of a vehicle, no matter their age, front and back seat, must wear seatbelts.
This document provides an overview of the Introduction to Law Enforcement orientation course. It discusses the statutory authority given to CLEET (Council on Law Enforcement Education and Training) to set standards and conduct training for Oklahoma peace officers. It identifies the types of training provided by CLEET, including orientation, legal matters, firearms, investigations and more. It also discusses the origins of modern law enforcement, including Sir Robert Peel establishing the first professional police force in London in 1829 and his nine principles of law enforcement that still guide police work today.
Indonesian Capital Market Act/UU No.8 Tahun 1995 tentang Pasar Modal (Unoffci...Adnan Fauzi Siregar
This document is an unofficial English translation of Indonesia's Law Number 8 Year 1996 Concerning the Capital Market. It defines key terms related to Indonesia's capital market such as securities, issuers, public offerings, investment advisors, securities exchanges, clearing guarantee institutions, and the roles and responsibilities of the capital market supervisory agency known as BAPEPAM. The law aims to provide a sound legal foundation for entities operating in the capital market and protect investors by requiring public disclosure of information and establishing rules on fraud, market manipulation, and insider trading.
Human_Rights_Guidance_for_Police_Authorities-Human Rights Guidance - Jan 09SAIMA AFZAL MBE
The document provides guidance for police authorities on monitoring compliance with the Human Rights Act 1998. It outlines the key aspects of the Act and human rights standards applicable to policing. Specifically, it discusses:
1) The mandatory duty for police authorities to monitor their local police force's compliance with the Human Rights Act.
2) The three categories of rights protected by the Act - absolute, special, and qualified rights - and what restrictions are permitted for each.
3) Key human rights standards derived from the European Convention on Human Rights, including the requirements that any interference with qualified rights must be prescribed by law, legitimate, necessary and proportionate.
The proposed system by civil society aims to establish independent anti-corruption bodies like Lokpal at the centre and Lokayukta at the state level to investigate and prosecute politicians and officers without needing permission. It also aims to merge existing corruption investigation bodies like the CBI and ACB into these new independent agencies. The new system proposes strict timelines for investigation and prosecution of corrupt individuals, enhanced punishment, and transparent functioning of the anti-corruption bodies.
The document discusses ethics in government service. It defines ethics and outlines several ethical bases including rules, results, relationships, and tradition. It discusses key concepts like good governance, public service ethics, and standards. It also outlines several laws and rules that govern ethics for public officials like the Constitution, the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, and the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees. Unethical behavior can have negative consequences like creating dehumanizing situations, a loss of public trust, and a bad public image, even if it is not necessarily illegal. The document emphasizes that while some behaviors may not be prohibited, they are still not appropriate or ethical for public servants.
The document outlines the process for establishing an independent Lokpal authority in India to investigate and prosecute corruption cases. It proposes a selection committee to appoint 11 members including the chairperson from a shortlist prepared by a search committee comprising retired judges and others from civil society. The Lokpal would have powers to investigate public officials, review citizen charters, and oversee anti-corruption efforts following principles of transparency and accountability from the UN Convention Against Corruption.
Jan lokpal bill vs politics mani mishraMani Mishra
The document discusses corruption in Indian politics and efforts to establish an anti-corruption organization. It provides details on current anti-corruption laws and agencies, the history of the Jan Lokpal bill, comparisons between the current system and the proposed Jan Lokpal-Jan Lokayukta system, and shortcomings in the government-passed version of the Lokpal bill. The document concludes that while the Jan Lokpal bill drafted by civil society was intended to eradicate corruption, the version passed by the government was amended and less effective due to political influences.
The document summarizes key features of the Jan Lokpal Bill, an anti-corruption law proposed in India. It outlines that the bill proposes establishing independent anti-corruption organizations called LOKPAL at the central level and LOKAYUKTA at the state level to investigate and prosecute corruption cases. It details that cases will have to be investigated within 1 year and tried within 2 years to expedite the process. It also describes provisions for protecting whistleblowers and compensating citizens if public services are not delivered on time.
The document discusses the concept of sanction for prosecution under Indian law. It provides definitions for key terms like public servant and discusses the legal provisions around sanction requirements. Some main points:
- Sanction is required before prosecuting a public servant to prevent vexatious/frivolous cases and protect the innocent.
- The Prevention of Corruption Act and Code of Criminal Procedure contain sanction provisions for prosecuting public servants.
- A public servant is broadly defined and can include government employees, elected officials, and others. Ministers and the Chief Minister are considered public servants.
- Sanction is typically granted by the authority that appointed the public servant, but the Governor has power to grant sanction for prosecuting
The document summarizes the evolution of anti-corruption laws in India. It discusses how the Indian Penal Code of 1862 was supplemented by the Prevention of Corruption Act of 1947 to define criminal misconduct. The PC Act was further expanded in 1988 and recently amended in 2018. The key amendments in 2018 include narrowing the definition of criminal misconduct, introducing time limits for trial completion, and provisions targeting bribery by commercial organizations.
This document provides an overview and summary of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 in India. It discusses how the Act aims to curb corruption among public servants by defining criminal offenses and associated penalties. Key points include:
- The Act consolidated previous anti-corruption laws and expanded the definition of a "public servant." It created special courts to try corruption cases.
- Offenses under the Act include a public servant accepting bribes, obtaining pecuniary advantages through abuse of power, or possessing disproportionate assets. Penalties include minimum six month imprisonment.
- The Act also includes presumptions of guilt that shift the burden of proof to the accused public servant in some cases. Investigation of offenses can be done
This document discusses combating corruption in Bangladesh and the role of civil servants. It begins with an overview of the Anti-Corruption Commission of Bangladesh, including its historical development, mission, organizational structure, and powers. It then discusses definitions of corruption, types of corruption, consequences of corruption, and roles civil servants can play in reducing corruption through transparency, accountability, and upholding the rule of law. Specific corruption issues in Bangladesh like nepotism and bribery in various sectors are also examined.
Corruption could be an important obstacle to business in Pakistan, and firms ought to expect to frequently encounter felony or different corrupt practices. Corruption is rampant altogether sectors and establishments.
The document summarizes the key aspects of the UK Bribery Act of 2010, which introduced stricter laws against bribery. It outlines the four main offences under the Act: 1) offering bribes, 2) accepting bribes, 3) bribing foreign officials, and 4) failure of companies to prevent bribery. It also discusses the penalties for violating these offences, which include imprisonment of up to 10 years and unlimited fines for individuals and companies. Finally, it argues that Bangladesh should introduce similar anti-bribery laws to penalize bribe payers and ensure companies have adequate procedures to prevent bribery.
This document defines the crime of plunder under Republic Act No. 7080. Plunder is defined as any public officer who amasses ill-gotten wealth of at least 50 million pesos through a combination of acts like misappropriation of public funds, receiving kickbacks, or taking advantage of their position. Any person who participates with the public officer in committing acts contributing to plunder will also be punished. If convicted, the public officer will lose all retirement benefits and all ill-gotten wealth will be forfeited to the state.
The Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act defines corrupt practices for public officers and private individuals interacting with the government. It prohibits receiving gifts in relation to contracts, employment with private entities under certain circumstances, undisclosed conflicts of interest, and unexplained wealth disproportionate to salary. Violations are punishable by imprisonment, fines, and forfeiture of property. Public officers must also file annual statements disclosing their assets, liabilities, income and taxes.
The document discusses the need to reform the Indian police system. It notes that while citizens expect the police to protect them, the current image of the police is that of being corrupt and colluding with criminals. There are issues with the police selection process, lack of accountability to the public, inadequate training, and lack of modernization. The document advocates for making the police independent of political interference, improving recruitment, training, and making the complaint system more accessible. Overall reforms are needed to make the police more citizen-centric and accountable.
This document discusses money laundering in Malaysia. It begins by listing some student names and defining money laundering as disguising illegally obtained money to make it appear legitimate. It then provides details on Malaysia's anti-money laundering laws, noting that money laundering is punishable by up to 15 years in prison and fines of at least 5 times the value of the unlawful funds. The document also states that Malaysia was at medium risk for money laundering from 2013 to 2017 according to statistics and identifies weaknesses in financial procedures and controls as contributing factors.
This document discusses ethics and accountability in the Philippine public sector. It outlines the legal and constitutional frameworks that establish ethical standards for public officials, such as the Code of Conduct and Anti-Graft laws. It also describes the oversight institutions that enforce these standards, including the Civil Service Commission, Office of the Ombudsman, and Commission on Audit. Additionally, it discusses how political commitment, an active citizenry that provides feedback, and initiatives to promote ethics help reinforce ethics and accountability in the Philippine government.
This document discusses accountability, anti-corruption measures, and their impact on public administration. It provides:
1) A historical background of anti-corruption commissions in Bangladesh, from their origins under British rule to the establishment of the Anti-Corruption Commission in 2004.
2) An overview of the Anti-Corruption Commission of Bangladesh, including its structure, functions, and powers to investigate corruption cases and require officials to declare their assets.
3) A discussion of transparency and accountability measures that can be used to prevent corruption, such as open integrity policies, transparency in decision-making, and strong oversight and enforcement.
Texas Department of Public Safety - New Traffic, Criminal Laws Set To Go Into...Ken Brand
Subject: New Texas Traffic Laws - 9/1/09 – See Attachment
I wanted you to be aware that new traffic laws will be take effect September 1, 2009 in Texas. Here are some you should be aware of, but please take a look at the attached document from the Texas Department of Public Safety for more details.
1. Teen Drivers: Effective September 1, 2009, the laws for teenage drivers are getting tougher. Drivers younger than 18 are banned from using cell phones while driving (dialing, talking, texting) and total hours of behind-the-wheel driving instruction a teen receives is increasing from 14 to 34 before getting a license.
2. Driving in a School Zone: Effective September 1, 2009, the use of a wireless device within a reduced-speed school zone is prohibited. Cellular phones may be used while the vehicle is stopped in a school zone or with a hands-free device. The law also applies to bus drivers. Violators are subject to a fine of up to $200. Note: Cities or counties wanting to enforce this law must post a sign at the beginning of each school zone to inform drivers that using a wireless communications device is prohibited and the operator is subject to a fine. THE SIGNS ARE UP IN SOME AREAS!
3. Seat Belts: Effective September 1, 2009, all occupants of a vehicle, no matter their age, front and back seat, must wear seatbelts.
This document provides an overview of the Introduction to Law Enforcement orientation course. It discusses the statutory authority given to CLEET (Council on Law Enforcement Education and Training) to set standards and conduct training for Oklahoma peace officers. It identifies the types of training provided by CLEET, including orientation, legal matters, firearms, investigations and more. It also discusses the origins of modern law enforcement, including Sir Robert Peel establishing the first professional police force in London in 1829 and his nine principles of law enforcement that still guide police work today.
Indonesian Capital Market Act/UU No.8 Tahun 1995 tentang Pasar Modal (Unoffci...Adnan Fauzi Siregar
This document is an unofficial English translation of Indonesia's Law Number 8 Year 1996 Concerning the Capital Market. It defines key terms related to Indonesia's capital market such as securities, issuers, public offerings, investment advisors, securities exchanges, clearing guarantee institutions, and the roles and responsibilities of the capital market supervisory agency known as BAPEPAM. The law aims to provide a sound legal foundation for entities operating in the capital market and protect investors by requiring public disclosure of information and establishing rules on fraud, market manipulation, and insider trading.
Human_Rights_Guidance_for_Police_Authorities-Human Rights Guidance - Jan 09SAIMA AFZAL MBE
The document provides guidance for police authorities on monitoring compliance with the Human Rights Act 1998. It outlines the key aspects of the Act and human rights standards applicable to policing. Specifically, it discusses:
1) The mandatory duty for police authorities to monitor their local police force's compliance with the Human Rights Act.
2) The three categories of rights protected by the Act - absolute, special, and qualified rights - and what restrictions are permitted for each.
3) Key human rights standards derived from the European Convention on Human Rights, including the requirements that any interference with qualified rights must be prescribed by law, legitimate, necessary and proportionate.
The proposed system by civil society aims to establish independent anti-corruption bodies like Lokpal at the centre and Lokayukta at the state level to investigate and prosecute politicians and officers without needing permission. It also aims to merge existing corruption investigation bodies like the CBI and ACB into these new independent agencies. The new system proposes strict timelines for investigation and prosecution of corrupt individuals, enhanced punishment, and transparent functioning of the anti-corruption bodies.
The document discusses ethics in government service. It defines ethics and outlines several ethical bases including rules, results, relationships, and tradition. It discusses key concepts like good governance, public service ethics, and standards. It also outlines several laws and rules that govern ethics for public officials like the Constitution, the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, and the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees. Unethical behavior can have negative consequences like creating dehumanizing situations, a loss of public trust, and a bad public image, even if it is not necessarily illegal. The document emphasizes that while some behaviors may not be prohibited, they are still not appropriate or ethical for public servants.
The document outlines the process for establishing an independent Lokpal authority in India to investigate and prosecute corruption cases. It proposes a selection committee to appoint 11 members including the chairperson from a shortlist prepared by a search committee comprising retired judges and others from civil society. The Lokpal would have powers to investigate public officials, review citizen charters, and oversee anti-corruption efforts following principles of transparency and accountability from the UN Convention Against Corruption.
Jan lokpal bill vs politics mani mishraMani Mishra
The document discusses corruption in Indian politics and efforts to establish an anti-corruption organization. It provides details on current anti-corruption laws and agencies, the history of the Jan Lokpal bill, comparisons between the current system and the proposed Jan Lokpal-Jan Lokayukta system, and shortcomings in the government-passed version of the Lokpal bill. The document concludes that while the Jan Lokpal bill drafted by civil society was intended to eradicate corruption, the version passed by the government was amended and less effective due to political influences.
The document summarizes key features of the Jan Lokpal Bill, an anti-corruption law proposed in India. It outlines that the bill proposes establishing independent anti-corruption organizations called LOKPAL at the central level and LOKAYUKTA at the state level to investigate and prosecute corruption cases. It details that cases will have to be investigated within 1 year and tried within 2 years to expedite the process. It also describes provisions for protecting whistleblowers and compensating citizens if public services are not delivered on time.
The Jan Lokpal Bill (Hindi: जन लोकपाल विधेयक), also referred to as the citizens' ombudsman bill, is a proposed anti-corruption law in India. It was proposed by anti-corruption social activists as a more effective improvement to the original Lokpal bill, which is currently being proposed by the the Government of India. The prefix Jan (translation: citizens) was added to signify the fact that these improvements include input provided by "ordinary citizens" through an activist-driven, non-governmental public consultation
In 2011, Gandhian rights activist Anna Hazare started a Satyagraha movement by commencing a fast unto death in New Delhi to demand the passing of the bill. The movement attracted attention in the media, and thousands of supporters. Following Hazare's four day hunger strike, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh stated that the bill would be re-introduced in the 2011 monsoon session of the Parliament.
The document summarizes key aspects of the Lokpal Bill in India:
1) The bill seeks to establish an independent body called the Lokpal to investigate allegations of corruption against public officials like ministers and members of parliament.
2) The Lokpal will consist of a chairperson and up to eight members, including current or former Supreme Court judges.
3) A selection committee will choose the Lokpal members. The committee includes the prime minister, parliamentary leaders, and senior judges.
4) The Lokpal will have powers to investigate and prosecute cases of corruption, with investigations to be completed within strict timelines.
The Jan Lokpal Bill proposes establishing independent anti-corruption ombudsmen called Jan Lokpal at the central level and Jan Lokayuktas in each state. These bodies would investigate and prosecute cases of corruption in government departments in a time-bound manner. The bill also aims to provide protection and compensation to whistleblowers and citizens facing corruption. Selection processes and oversight mechanisms are proposed to ensure the independence and accountability of Jan Lokpal/Lokayukta members.
The document discusses the Jan Lokpal Bill, an anti-corruption bill in India that aims to establish an independent body called Lokpal to investigate corruption cases. It would have jurisdiction over members of parliament and central government employees. Key features include setting up independent institutions free from government influence to quickly investigate cases and recover losses, with protection for complainants. The bill was drafted by civil society activists and sparked large protests led by Anna Hazare and his India Against Corruption movement to pressure the government to pass the bill, though some have criticized its approach and scope. Support comes from surveys, legislators, social media, and if passed it could significantly reduce corruption through strong independent oversight and swift action on cases.
Diff between jan lokpal and govt. lokpalSumit Gupta
This document compares the views of Team Anna and the government on key issues regarding the Lokpal Bill, which aims to establish an independent anti-corruption ombudsman. Some of the major points of contention are:
1. Whether the Prime Minister should come under the Lokpal's jurisdiction or continue to be investigated by agencies under his control.
2. Whether the judiciary and MPs should be subject to Lokpal investigations or have their own accountability mechanisms.
3. The composition and selection process of the Lokpal body, with Team Anna advocating for more independence and the government retaining more control.
4. Who the Lokpal would be accountable to and how complaints against it would be handled.
The document discusses the Lokpal Bill in India. Some key points:
1) The Lokpal Bill aims to establish an anti-corruption ombudsman body called the Lokpal to investigate corruption complaints against public officials and politicians.
2) There is disagreement between the government and activist Anna Hazare around provisions of the bill, such as punitive actions for false complaints.
3) Hazare went on a hunger strike in 2011 to demand a stronger Jan Lokpal Bill with more oversight powers over investigations and prosecutions.
4) 18 state governments have already passed legislation to establish their own local anti-corruption bodies called Lokayuktas.
The Lokpal is an anti-corruption body in India composed of a maximum of 8 members, half of which must be judicial members. It has jurisdiction to investigate allegations of corruption against certain public servants, including the Prime Minister, Ministers, Members of Parliament, and high-ranking government officials. Complaints are first subjected to a preliminary inquiry and may then be investigated by the Central Bureau of Investigation or other agencies. If evidence of corruption is found, the Lokpal can sanction prosecution in special courts established under the Lokpal Act. The Lokpal has wide-ranging powers to investigate complaints, attach properties, and recommend the suspension of accused public servants.
The document summarizes key differences between the Jan Lokpal draft bill and the government's draft Lokpal bill. Some key issues highlighted are that the government's draft bill: 1) only covers a small percentage of public servants and excludes the Prime Minister, judiciary, and MPs; 2) provides protections for accused officials but harsh penalties for frivolous complaints against them; 3) has an investigation process that is seen as "pro-accused"; and 4) makes the Lokpal accountable to the government rather than the people. The Jan Lokpal draft bill is presented as having stronger provisions for independence, transparency and accountability.
The document outlines key points about the proposed Jan Lokpal Bill in India. It proposes establishing an independent anti-corruption body called LOKPAL at the central level and LOKAYUKTA at state levels to investigate and prosecute cases of corruption within two years. The LOKPAL would have powers to impose penalties on public officials who do not complete citizens' work in time, and investigate cases of corruption in areas like ration distribution and infrastructure projects. Members of the LOKPAL would be selected through a transparent process without political interference. Any complaints against LOKPAL officers would also be promptly investigated. Existing anti-corruption agencies would be merged under the LOKPAL.
The document discusses the history and objectives of the Lokpal bill in India, which aims to establish an independent body called the Lokpal to investigate corruption complaints against public servants and politicians. Key points include:
- The Lokpal is modeled after the ombudsman system in other countries and aims to increase accountability of public servants and address rising corruption.
- Previous versions of the Lokpal bill have failed to pass due to lack of political will. The current bill aims to establish a 3-member Lokpal body with powers to investigate corruption complaints.
- The bill aims to provide a faster, cheaper alternative to existing anti-corruption mechanisms and make high-level politicians and public servants more accountable. However,
The document discusses the Jan Lokpal Bill, a draft anti-corruption bill in India seeking an independent body called Lokpal to investigate corruption cases. It would complete investigations within a year and trials within the next year. Key features include establishing a central anti-corruption institution supervised by independent authorities. Anna Hazare initiated a movement in 2011 to pass a stronger Lokpal bill as conceived in the Jan Lokpal Bill.
The document discusses the Jan Lokpal Bill and its key provisions. It outlines that the Lokpal would be the central anti-corruption ombudsman while the Lokayukta would serve the same function at the state level. Selection of Lokpal members would involve senior leaders and judges. The Lokpal would have independence and powers to investigate corruption cases within strict timelines, impose penalties, and initiate contempt proceedings. It would merge existing anti-corruption agencies and ensure transparency in its own functioning. The bill also aims to address corruption at lower levels through measures like citizen charters and protecting whistleblowers.
The document compares and contrasts the key differences between the government's draft Lokpal bill and the civil society draft bill. Some of the major differences highlighted include: selection and composition of the Lokpal members and search committee; accountability and independence of the Lokpal; jurisdiction and scope of corruption covered; powers to investigate complaints and tap phones; whistleblower protection; and inclusion of the prime minister. The civil society draft provides for a more independent and effective anti-corruption body compared to the government's draft which is seen as keeping control over the Lokpal and potentially making it a "puppet in the government's hands."
This document provides an overview of delegated legislation in India. It defines delegated legislation as the exercise of legislative power by an agent who is lower in rank or subordinate to the legislative body. The document discusses the history and types of delegated legislation under the Indian constitution. It outlines cases that illustrate judicial control over delegated legislation and analyzes the effectiveness of parliamentary control. The document also discusses advantages and criticisms of the practice of delegated legislation in India.
Mr. Greco Belgica : Pork Barrel Petition PresentationNowPlanetTV
This document is a petition to declare the Philippine pork barrel system unconstitutional. It argues that the pork barrel system violates the principle of separation of powers and checks and balances by allowing Congress to intrude on executive functions. It also claims the system lacks accountability and transparency. The petition requests the Supreme Court to declare pork barrel funds like the Priority Development Assistance Fund as unconstitutional and to order the Executive to provide details on usage of lump sum discretionary funds. It seeks to prohibit all respondents from including pork barrel in future budgets.
The document is a petition to declare the pork barrel system in the Philippines unconstitutional. It makes the case that the pork barrel system violates separation of powers and checks and balances by allowing Congress to intrude on executive functions. It also argues that the pork barrel system is impervious to accountability and amounts to grave abuse of discretion. The petition requests that the Supreme Court give due course to the petition and immediately issue injunctions preventing the release of any pork barrel funds and related actions by the executive branch, Congress, and the National Treasurer.
The document discusses the ongoing debate around Lokpal, an anti-corruption ombudsman institution in India. It provides background on similar ombudsman models in other countries and discusses various proposals and bills regarding Lokpal in India, including its powers, qualifications, and selection process. Key points of contention have included the scope of officials under its jurisdiction and whether the prime minister should be included. Overall, the document outlines the history and ongoing discussion around establishing an independent anti-corruption watchdog in India.
NAB and Corruption in Business in PakistanAyesha Majid
the core objective of this paper is to beware ourselves of what are the practices that must be avoided in practical world in Pakistan as to stay legal and avoid fraudulent practices in both private and government sector. Also in lieu of the current National Action Plan, NAB is very active in bringing the culprits within the framework of law.
Article 11 accountability of public officersJudithFtlvr
1. The document outlines the accountability of public officers under the Philippine Constitution. It defines key terms like public office, public officer, and establishes standards for integrity and conduct.
2. It discusses the process for impeachment of public officials, the grounds for impeachment, and which officials can be impeached.
3. It creates the Office of the Ombudsman to investigate graft and corruption, and outlines their powers, functions, and fiscal autonomy.
4. It establishes protections against ill-gotten wealth and conflicts of interest, and requires public officers to disclose their assets and maintain allegiance to the State.
This document discusses key concepts related to political law and local government in the Philippines. It begins by defining political law and its divisions such as constitutional law and administrative law. It then discusses different types of corporations including public, private, and quasi-public corporations. A major focus is on municipal corporations, including their definition and elements. The document also defines local government and discusses the sources of power and classifications of powers of local governments. Key provisions from the 1987 Constitution and Local Government Code related to local governments are summarized.
This document provides information about the legislative branch of the Philippine government. It discusses the structure of Congress, which is bicameral consisting of the Senate and House of Representatives. It outlines the qualifications, terms of office, powers and duties of members of the House of Representatives, including their freedom of speech and debate, and investigative powers. It also summarizes the law-making process in the Philippines.
The document provides information about the House of Representatives in the Philippines. It discusses that the House is part of the bicameral Congress, along with the Senate. It outlines various sections from the 1987 Constitution regarding the composition and powers of the House, such as representing the citizens, its legislative functions, and investigative powers. The summary also mentions privileges of House members like freedom from arrest and speech during sessions.
1) The document discusses various issues and proposals related to strengthening anti-corruption institutions like the Lokpal bill, CAG, CVC and CBI in India.
2) It argues that instead of creating a new parallel anti-corruption body like the Lokpal, existing institutions like the CAG, CVC and CBI should be reformed, given more independence and resources to effectively tackle corruption.
3) The author proposes various reforms like making the CAG and CVC multi-member bodies, increasing their powers, budgets and staffing to properly investigate all government agencies and departments currently under their purview.
LEGISLATIVE ACTS AS BASES FOR PUBLIC POLICYKathleen Abubo
The document discusses the role of the Philippine legislative branch in the public policy-making process. It explains that the legislative branch is responsible for crafting laws through bills and resolutions. Bills require approval by both houses of Congress and the President to become law, while resolutions express principles or sentiments and do not require Presidential approval. Examples of bills that became law, like the Bayanihan to Heal as One Act, are provided. The types of resolutions - joint, concurrent, and simple - are also outlined.
Shivani Dharmaraj Pawar
NLC IV
Roll No- 5422
Sub- Jurisprudence
College Name- Yashwantao Chavan Law College, Malkapur-Karad
Subject Teacher- Dr. M.S.Khairnar
The document discusses various corporate laws that are important for corporate citizens to understand, including the Companies Act, Contract Act, Negotiable Instruments Act, and intellectual property laws. It defines a company and outlines the characteristics of public and private companies. It also describes the formation process for a company, contents of the memorandum and articles of association, and key concepts like prospectus, kinds of companies, and corporate veil.
The document summarizes the Jan Lokpal Bill, an anti-corruption bill drafted by civil society activists in India. It discusses key features of the bill such as establishing a central anti-corruption body called Lokpal to investigate corruption cases independently. It also covers differences between the government's draft Lokpal bill and the Jan Lokpal bill, as well as advantages and disadvantages of the proposed bill. Overall, the Jan Lokpal bill aims to create a stronger anti-corruption framework in India by granting more independence and powers to the Lokpal agency.
The document discusses the Katarungang Pambarangay, the barangay justice system in the Philippines. It was established by the Local Government Code of 1991 to provide a venue for amicable settlement of disputes at the barangay level. The barangay captain appoints a Lupon or committee of 10-20 members to facilitate mediation between disputing parties. The Lupon helps the parties find mutually agreeable solutions rather than acting as judges. A wide range of civil and criminal cases can be addressed through the barangay justice system.
AAP's Janlokpal is weaker than Central Govt's LokpalShivendra Chauhan
The document highlights key differences between the central Lokpal bill and the AAP's proposed Jan Lokpal bill for Delhi. Some key differences include:
1) The composition and experience requirements of the selection committees that appoint Lokpal members differ, with the AAP bill potentially favoring those with legal experience or ties to AAP.
2) The AAP bill excludes MLAs of Delhi and NGOs from the Lokpal's jurisdiction, while the central bill includes them.
3) Provisions around frivolous complaints, repeal of existing laws, reporting structures, and prosecution powers are less stringent or clear in the AAP bill compared to the central bill.
This document summarizes the key provisions of Article XI of the 1987 Philippine Constitution regarding accountability of public officers. It outlines the grounds and process for impeachment of high-ranking officials, as well as the procedures for removal of other public officers. It also describes the powers, functions, and composition of key accountability institutions like the Office of the Ombudsman, Sandiganbayan, and Office of the Special Prosecutor. Other topics covered include prohibitions on certain financial transactions, requirements for statements of assets/liabilities, and allegiance of public officers.
The document summarizes the key aspects of the proposed Jan Lokpal Bill in India, which aims to establish an independent anti-corruption ombudsman agency called the Jan Lokpal at the central government level and corresponding Jan Lokayuktas in each state. The Jan Lokpal and Lokayuktas would have powers to investigate and prosecute cases of corruption in a time-bound manner, recover stolen public funds, and dismiss corrupt public servants from their jobs. Selection processes for members and oversight measures are also outlined to ensure the independence and accountability of these new agencies.
The powers of the government, by virtue of this principle are divided into three (3) distinct classes: the legislative, the executive and the judicial. They are distributed, respectively among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches or departments of the government.
Under the principle of co-equal and coordinate powers among the three (3) branches, the officers entrusted with each of these powers are not permitted to encroach upon the powers confided to the others. If one department goes beyond the limits set by the Constitution, its acts are null and void. The adoption of this principle was motivated by the belief that arbitrary rule would result if the same person or body were to exercise all the powers of the government.
The document discusses the role and powers of the Ombudsman in the Philippine government based on provisions in Article XI of the Philippine Constitution. It states that the Ombudsman investigates and prosecutes government officials accused of crimes, independently monitors all three branches of government, and receives complaints from citizens. The Ombudsman usually prosecutes officials accused of graft and corruption. It also outlines the qualifications and appointment process for the Ombudsman and deputies.
Success is often not achievable without facing and overcoming obstacles along the way. To reach our goals and achieve success, it is important to understand and resolve the obstacles that come in our way.
In this article, we will discuss the various obstacles that hinder success, strategies to overcome them, and examples of individuals who have successfully surmounted their obstacles.
Learnings from Successful Jobs SearchersBruce Bennett
Are you interested to know what actions help in a job search? This webinar is the summary of several individuals who discussed their job search journey for others to follow. You will learn there are common actions that helped them succeed in their quest for gainful employment.
In the intricate tapestry of life, connections serve as the vibrant threads that weave together opportunities, experiences, and growth. Whether in personal or professional spheres, the ability to forge meaningful connections opens doors to a multitude of possibilities, propelling individuals toward success and fulfillment.
Eirini is an HR professional with strong passion for technology and semiconductors industry in particular. She started her career as a software recruiter in 2012, and developed an interest for business development, talent enablement and innovation which later got her setting up the concept of Software Community Management in ASML, and to Developer Relations today. She holds a bachelor degree in Lifelong Learning and an MBA specialised in Strategic Human Resources Management. She is a world citizen, having grown up in Greece, she studied and kickstarted her career in The Netherlands and can currently be found in Santa Clara, CA.
A Guide to a Winning Interview June 2024Bruce Bennett
This webinar is an in-depth review of the interview process. Preparation is a key element to acing an interview. Learn the best approaches from the initial phone screen to the face-to-face meeting with the hiring manager. You will hear great answers to several standard questions, including the dreaded “Tell Me About Yourself”.
Leadership Ambassador club Adventist modulekakomaeric00
Aims to equip people who aspire to become leaders with good qualities,and with Christian values and morals as per Biblical teachings.The you who aspire to be leaders should first read and understand what the ambassador module for leadership says about leadership and marry that to what the bible says.Christians sh
We recently hosted the much-anticipated Community Skill Builders Workshop during our June online meeting. This event was a culmination of six months of listening to your feedback and crafting solutions to better support your PMI journey. Here’s a look back at what happened and the exciting developments that emerged from our collaborative efforts.
A Gathering of Minds
We were thrilled to see a diverse group of attendees, including local certified PMI trainers and both new and experienced members eager to contribute their perspectives. The workshop was structured into three dynamic discussion sessions, each led by our dedicated membership advocates.
Key Takeaways and Future Directions
The insights and feedback gathered from these discussions were invaluable. Here are some of the key takeaways and the steps we are taking to address them:
• Enhanced Resource Accessibility: We are working on a new, user-friendly resource page that will make it easier for members to access training materials and real-world application guides.
• Structured Mentorship Program: Plans are underway to launch a mentorship program that will connect members with experienced professionals for guidance and support.
• Increased Networking Opportunities: Expect to see more frequent and varied networking events, both virtual and in-person, to help you build connections and foster a sense of community.
Moving Forward
We are committed to turning your feedback into actionable solutions that enhance your PMI journey. This workshop was just the beginning. By actively participating and sharing your experiences, you have helped shape the future of our Chapter’s offerings.
Thank you to everyone who attended and contributed to the success of the Community Skill Builders Workshop. Your engagement and enthusiasm are what make our Chapter strong and vibrant. Stay tuned for updates on the new initiatives and opportunities to get involved. Together, we are building a community that supports and empowers each other on our PMI journeys.
Stay connected, stay engaged, and let’s continue to grow together!
About PMI Silver Spring Chapter
We are a branch of the Project Management Institute. We offer a platform for project management professionals in Silver Spring, MD, and the DC/Baltimore metro area. Monthly meetings facilitate networking, knowledge sharing, and professional development. For more, visit pmissc.org.
Joyce M Sullivan, Founder & CEO of SocMediaFin, Inc. shares her "Five Questions - The Story of You", "Reflections - What Matters to You?" and "The Three Circle Exercise" to guide those evaluating what their next move may be in their careers.
1. LOKPAL BILL GOVERNMENT VS TEAM ANNA OBJECTIVE VIEWS
2. TEAM ANNA SHOULD THE PM COME UNDER THE AMBIT OF LOKPAL? GOVERNMENT COMPLAIN OF ‘CORRUPTION’ 7 MEMBER LOKPAL PANEL GUILTY OR NOT GUILTY PM WILL HAVE TO RESIGN POLITICAL INSTABILITY DURING ERA OF COALITION GOVTS/MULTIPLE PARTIES NO POLITICAL SEAT IN INDIA IN WAR LIKE SITUATION COMPLAIN OF ‘CORRUPTION’ COMPLAIN NOT ENTERTAINED UNLESS PM DEMITS OFFICE AFTER COMPLETING HIS TERM FORMER PM PROSECUTED IF GUILTY STABLE GOVT. FOR 5 YEARS EVEN IN DIFFICULT CIRCUMSTANCES
3. WHERE WILL THE GOVT. GET 50,000 “HONEST” JUNIOR LOKPALS, FROM THE SAME ‘CORRUPT SYSTEM’? TEAM ANNA SHOULD LOWER BUREAUCRACY BE UNDER AMBIT OF LOKPAL? GOVERNMENT YES, IT SHOULD COME WILL CREATE A FORCE OF 50,000 JUNIOR ‘LOKPALS’ TO MONITOR THE STATE AND CENTRAL BUREAUCRACY EVERYBODY WILL OVERSEE EVERYBODY NO IT SHOULD NOT COME, ONLY HIGHER BUREAUCRACY FOR LARGE SCAMS 1.5 CRORE GOVT EMPLOYEES – SYSTEMS LIKE RTI, PUBLIC GRIEVENCES, E-GOVERNANCE ALREADY IN PLACE AND ARE BENIFITING ‘AAM AADMI’ ! THE FEAR OF A LOKPAL ENQUIRY WILL RESULT IN SLOW DECISION MAKING AT LOWER LEVEL, PAIN FOR AAM AADMI !
4. SUCH ALLEGATIONS SHOULD BE LEFT TO BE INVESTIGATED AND PROSECUTED BY THE PARLIAMENT AND IN COURT TEAM ANNA SHOULD MP’S “CASH FOR VOTE” ETC BE INCLUDED? GOVERNMENT YES, IT SHOULD COME ALLEGATION OF BRIBERY FOR VOTE OR SPEAK IN PARLIAMENT 7 MEMBER LOKPAL MAY/MAY NOT PROSECUTE AN ELECTED MP NO IT SHOULD NOT COME PARLIAMENT IS SUPREME AND UNDER CONSTITUTION ITS POWERS SHOULD NOT BE DISSOLVED, UNLESS THEY ARE AMMENDED UNLESS ‘RIGHT TO RECALL’ IS IMPLEMENTED WITH ELECTORAL REFORMS THIS IS SUBVERSION OF POWERS OF PARLIAMENT
5. RESULTS IN INTERFERING IN THE BASIC STRUCTURE OF CONSTITUTION,WHERE THE 3 ORGANS- LEGILATURE, EXECUTIVE AND JUDICIARY ARE INDEPENDENT LAW ALREADY DRAFTED AND ON WEBSITE OF MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE, DUE SUGGESTIONS WILL BE ENTERTAINED AND REMOVAL OF JUDGES WILL FOLLOW ACCORDING TO THE LAW, LOKPAL CANNOT INTEREFE IN BASIC ORGANS TEAM ANNA SHOULD JUDICIARY BE BROUGHT UNDER LOKPAL? GOVERNMENT YES, IT SHOULD COME 7 MEMBER LOKPAL MAY/MAY NOT PROSECUTE THE JUDGE SOLUTION IN JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY BILL, NOT IN LOKPAL BILL
6. CHANGES THE BASIC FEDERAL STRUCTURE OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION MORE LOKAYUKTAS CAN BE APPOINTED BY THE STATES WITH THEIR OWN LAWS TEAM ANNA LOKAYUKTA GOVERNMENT THE SAME BILL SHOULD PROVIDE LOKPAL AT CENTRE AND LOKAYUKTA IN STATES MORE THAN 18 STATES ALREADY HAVE A LOKAYUKTA
7. EACH DEPARTMENT SHOULD SPECIFY WHICH WORK WILL BE DONE BY WHICH OFFICER IN HOW MUCH TIME LOKPAL TO ACT AS OFFICER AND PENALTY TO BE IMPOSED IF NOT FOLLOWED THE PM MONITORS THE MINISTRIES, THE MINISTERIES MONITOR THEIR DEPARTMENTS, RTI IN PLACE, SCOPE OF A LOT OF IMPROVEMENT BY ENGAGING IN REFORMS ON LARGE SCALE TEAM ANNA SHOULD EACH DEPT HAVE A CITIZEN CHARTER FOR GRIEVANCE REDRESSEL ? GOVERNMENT YES ALREADY A PUBLIC GRIEVANCE REDRESS CELL IN PLACE IN CENTRAL GOVT LOKPAL OVERSEES EVERY LITTLE THING, LOKPAL BECOMES SUPREME
8. LOKPAL TO PROVIDE PROTECTION COMPLAINTS BY WHISTLEBLOWERS MUST BE TRACKED AND THEY MUST BE PROTECTED BILL IN THE DOMAIN OF STANDING COMMITTEE OF PARLIAMENT, BEING DISCUSSED AND RELAVENT SUGGESTIONS WILL BE TAKEN. DUE PROCESS OF LEGISLATION WILL BE FOLLOWED TEAM ANNA WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION GOVERNMENT WORKING ON A SEPARATE WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION BILL
9. 3 MONTHS OF JAIL IF AGAINST A MEMBER OF LOKPAL NO JAIL, FINE UPTO ONE LAKH IMPOSED BY THE LOKPAL THIS CLAUSE WILL HAVE ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE FUNCTIONING OF A LOKPAL. MANY LESS COMPLAINTS WOULD BE RECEIVED TEAM ANNA FALSE/FRIVILOUS COMPLAINTS TO LOKPAL GOVERNMENT 2 TO 5 YEARS OF JAIL IF A SERIOUS COMPLAINT. 20,000 TO 5 LAKH RUPEE PENALTY ANYBODY CAN MAKE ANY COMPLAINT AND WILL BE SCOTT FREE
10. LOKPAL TO INITIATE PROSECUTION ACCORDING TO PAC (PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT 1988) LOKPAL CAN APPOINT RETIRED JUDGES/JUDICIAL OFFICERS TO PROSECUTE THE COMPETANT AUTHORITY AFTER RECEIVING THE REPORT FROM LOKPAL HAS TO TAKE ACTION WITHIN 30 DAYS AND INFORM THE LOKPAL TEAM ANNA DISMISSAL OF A GOVT. OFFICIAL GUILTY OF CORRUPTION GOVERNMENT LOKPAL TO FILE A CASE IN SPECIAL COURT PROSECUTION OF PM TO BE INITIATED BY SC ONLY BE SANCTION OF LOKPAL, HENCE LOKPAL BECOMES SUPER SANCTIONING AUTHORITY ! FOR PM/MINISTERS , THE REPORT OF LOKPAL TO BE TABLED IN LOK SABHA, THEN ACTION WITHIN 90 DAYS
11. MAXIMUM PUNISHMENT OF LIFE IMPRISONMENT PUBLIC SERVANT TO BE REMOVED IF FOUND GUILTY TEAM ANNA PUNISHMENT OF CORRUPTION GOVERNMENT MAXIMUM PUNISHMENT OF 10 YEARS PUBLIC SERVANT TO BE REMOVED IF FOUND GUILTY ACCORDING TO IPC, LIFE IMPRISONMENT IS 14 YEARS IF CONDUCT IS GOOD, FOR OFFENCES LIKE MURDER, FOR CORRUPTION- 10 YEARS SEEMS JUSTIFIED
12. CBI UNDER LOKPAL TEAM ANNA MERGER OF CBI WITH LOKPAL GOVERNMENT LOKPAL WILL HAVE ITS OWN INVESTIGATIVE WING NO SANCTION SHALL BE REQUIRED BY THE LOKPAL TO INQUIRE ANY COMPLAINT AGAINST A PUBLIC SERVANT ALREADY BURDENED CBI CANNOT PERFORM SO MANY FUNCTIONS, ITS WING SHOULD BE STRENGTHENED. MAKE CBI INDEPENDENT CBI UNDER LOKPAL CANNOT BE INDEPENDENT, FOR CBI TO BE INDEPENDENT- IT SHOULD BE MONITERED BY THE SUPREME COURT LIKE IN THE RECENT CORRUPTION CASES
13. TO THE PEOPLE TEAM ANNA WHO WILL LOKPAL BE ACCOUNTABLE TO? GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABLE TO ALL THE EXECUTIVE, LEGILATURE AND JUDICIARY-ALL ORGANS OF THE CONSTITUTION THIS WILL JUSTIFY ITS FUNCTION OF ACTING AS A ‘REAL OMBUDSMEN’ BETWEEN ALL ORGANS TO BE PROSECUTED BY SUPREME COURT INITIATES PROCEEDINGS BY RECEIVING A COMPLAINT LOKPAL IS A ‘ UELECTED SUPER EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY ’, ACCOUNTABLE TO NONE- AS IT HAS THE POWERS TO PROSECUTE- LEGISLATURE, EXECUTIVE AS WELL AS JUDICIARY
14. SELECTION COMMITTEE OF 4 JUDGES, 2 POLITICIANS AND 2 BUREAUCRATS. MEMBERS OF THAT COMMITTEE BE SELECTED BY 10 CVIL SOCIETY REPRESENTATIVES TEAM ANNA SELECTION OF LOKPAL MEMBERS GOVERNMENT SELECTION COMMITTEE OF 5 POLITICIANS, 2 JUDGES, AN EMINENT JURIST AND ONE EMINENT PERSON WITH DEALING WITH ANTI CORRUPTION RTI CAN BE USED TO ATTAIN INFORMATION ON WHAT GROUNDS, THE COMMITTEE SELECTED THE MEMBERS OF THE LOKPAL DEFINATION OF ‘CIVIL SOCIETY’ MEMBERS VAGUE. WHO REPRESENTS THAT ‘CIVIL SOCIETY’ NOT KNOWN
15. LOKPAL BUDGET CHARGED TO CONSOLIDATED FUND OF INDIA TEAM ANNA FINANCES OF LOKPAL GOVERNMENT BUDGET TO BE DECIDED BY THE FINANCE MINISTRY BUDGET DECIDED BY LOKPAL, NOT TO EXCEED 0.25% OF REVENUE OF GOVT OF INDIA LOKPAL BECOMES THE ONLY ORGAN OF THE ‘GOVT’ WHOSE BUDGET IS NOT DECIDED BY FINANCE MINISTRY. AGAIN A ‘SUPER AUTHORITY’ ! LOKPAL BUDGET CHARGED TO CONSOLIDATED FUND OF INDIA INDIA IS GROWING AT 8.5% PER ANNUM. NO MINISTRY IN GOVT OF INDIA IS FACING REAL FINANCIAL PROBLEMS
16. LOKPAL CAN TAP PHONES TEAM ANNA POWERS TO TAP PHONES GOVERNMENT ENDANGERING NATIONAL SECURITY, IF HOME SEC IS NOT CONSULTED SANCTION OF HOME SEC REQUIRED TO TAP PHONES
17. NO NGO’S COVERED OTHER THAN GOVT. FUNDED TEAM ANNA NGO’S UNDER LOKPAL GOVERNMENT NO TRANSPARENCY FOR PRIVATE PLAYERS, THE SO CALLED CORRUPTION CRUSADE IS ONLY AGAINST GOVERNMENT AND NOT THE ENTIRE SYSTEM ALL NGO’S, OFFICERS OF ORGANIZATIONS HAVING AN ANNUAL INCOME ABOVE A SPECIFIED AMOUNT RECEIVING FUNDS FROM THE GOVERNMENT OR THE PUBLIC. CORRUPTION IS A UNIVERSAL PROBLEM AND NEEDS TO DEALT WITH COMPREHENSIVELY
18. DO WE NEED A SUPER MONSTER OR AN OMBUDSMEN ? YOU BE THE JUDGE !