This document provides a summary of litigation procedures and court structure in Kansas. It discusses the state's appellate courts (Supreme Court and Court of Appeals), trial courts (District Courts and Municipal Courts), and key statutes and rules governing litigation procedures. Direct appeals can generally be made from District Courts to the Court of Appeals, and from the Court of Appeals to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has discretion to review Court of Appeals decisions. To become a member of the Kansas bar, attorneys must graduate from an ABA-accredited law school, pass the bar exam, and prove good moral character and mental fitness. Kansas offers reciprocity to attorneys admitted in other states.
The North Carolina Court of Appeals issued an order granting a writ of prohibition to restrain the trial court from enforcing its order requiring the state to appropriate $1.7 billion in unappropriated school funding. The majority concluded that the trial court erred in interpreting the education clause of the state constitution as an ongoing appropriation, which would undermine the separation of powers and legislative authority over appropriations. A dissenting judge argued that the majority prematurely decided the case on an expedited schedule without allowing full briefing or argument.
This document is a notice of appeal filed by Governor Eric Holcomb appealing a trial court decision regarding the constitutionality of HEA 1123, an Indiana statute addressing the General Assembly's ability to address future emergencies. It provides information about the parties, attorneys, trial court case, basis for jurisdiction, requests for records, and certifications. The governor is appealing the trial court's entry and orders granting summary judgment to the defendants on the governor's challenge to HEA 1123 under the Indiana Constitution.
This document provides notice of intervention by the Legislative Intervenors in the lawsuit Hoke County Board of Education, et al., v. State of North Carolina, et al. The Legislative Intervenors, Philip E. Berger as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate and Timothy K. Moore as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives, are intervening on behalf of the General Assembly pursuant to a North Carolina statute that gives legislative leaders standing to intervene when the validity or constitutionality of a legislative act or constitutional provision is challenged. The notice argues that the lawsuit challenges recent legislation as well as provisions of the North Carolina Constitution concerning appropriations and the separation of powers.
The North Carolina State Board of Education filed a motion seeking relief from a 2002 court order requiring it to provide all students access to a sound basic education as defined by the state constitution. The court denied the motion, finding that while legislative reforms have been enacted, the State Board failed to present convincing evidence that the reforms have substantially complied with the constitutional mandate or moved the state closer to ensuring all children receive their right to an education meeting minimum standards of quality. Test score data and other evidence in the court record show that hundreds of thousands of students continue to be denied their right to a sound basic education. The court found the State Board's motion was untimely given it relied on reforms from 2012 but was not filed until 2017.
This document is a petition in support of a writ of habeas corpus seeking a reduction in bail for Anna Gristina. It summarizes that Gristina was arrested and charged with a single count of promoting prostitution in the third degree, a class D non-violent felony, and bail was set at $2 million bond or $1 million cash. It argues the bail is excessive given Gristina has no criminal record, strong community ties, and faces a non-custodial sentence if convicted. It requests the court grant the writ and set reasonable bail.
Deputy Grafton County Attorney Tara Heater Tells Judge James O'Neill III How ...Rich Bergeron
Pay particular attention to how this "objection" is worded. Judge O'Neill ends up not only filing the fastest order in my favor in the history of the case, but he also writes it as if he's only addressing it to the prosecution. My initial motion asked for the judge to either schedule a prompt trial date or dismiss the case. It was not a motion to dismiss, but the mere mention of a suggested dismissal made Judge O'Neill act fast, and the language of the request criticizing him so vociferously obviously made him furious.
Indiana's Public Access Counselor says Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita's Office must turn over documents requested by Indy Politics publisher Abdul-Hakim Shabazz regarding Shabazz being banned from Rokita's news conferences.
Newtown Loses By Default Judgment- NECA -vs- KaaihueAngela Kaaihue
Newtown Loses By Default Judgment- NECA -vs- Kaaihue, a five year litigation and court battle. When NECA board of directors, and community are jealous for driving right by a property that could have been purchased, but was inherited by Angela Kaaihue, who has turned the property she inherited into a Hawaiian Gold Mine.
Hawaii Appellant Court Supreme Court judge castegnetti, judge jeffrey crabtree, judge karen t. nakasone, judge katherine g. leonard, judge keith hiraoka, judge lisa m. ginoza, judge sonja mccullen, judge clyde j. wadsworth, judge karen holma, judge gary W.B. chang
The North Carolina Court of Appeals issued an order granting a writ of prohibition to restrain the trial court from enforcing its order requiring the state to appropriate $1.7 billion in unappropriated school funding. The majority concluded that the trial court erred in interpreting the education clause of the state constitution as an ongoing appropriation, which would undermine the separation of powers and legislative authority over appropriations. A dissenting judge argued that the majority prematurely decided the case on an expedited schedule without allowing full briefing or argument.
This document is a notice of appeal filed by Governor Eric Holcomb appealing a trial court decision regarding the constitutionality of HEA 1123, an Indiana statute addressing the General Assembly's ability to address future emergencies. It provides information about the parties, attorneys, trial court case, basis for jurisdiction, requests for records, and certifications. The governor is appealing the trial court's entry and orders granting summary judgment to the defendants on the governor's challenge to HEA 1123 under the Indiana Constitution.
This document provides notice of intervention by the Legislative Intervenors in the lawsuit Hoke County Board of Education, et al., v. State of North Carolina, et al. The Legislative Intervenors, Philip E. Berger as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate and Timothy K. Moore as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives, are intervening on behalf of the General Assembly pursuant to a North Carolina statute that gives legislative leaders standing to intervene when the validity or constitutionality of a legislative act or constitutional provision is challenged. The notice argues that the lawsuit challenges recent legislation as well as provisions of the North Carolina Constitution concerning appropriations and the separation of powers.
The North Carolina State Board of Education filed a motion seeking relief from a 2002 court order requiring it to provide all students access to a sound basic education as defined by the state constitution. The court denied the motion, finding that while legislative reforms have been enacted, the State Board failed to present convincing evidence that the reforms have substantially complied with the constitutional mandate or moved the state closer to ensuring all children receive their right to an education meeting minimum standards of quality. Test score data and other evidence in the court record show that hundreds of thousands of students continue to be denied their right to a sound basic education. The court found the State Board's motion was untimely given it relied on reforms from 2012 but was not filed until 2017.
This document is a petition in support of a writ of habeas corpus seeking a reduction in bail for Anna Gristina. It summarizes that Gristina was arrested and charged with a single count of promoting prostitution in the third degree, a class D non-violent felony, and bail was set at $2 million bond or $1 million cash. It argues the bail is excessive given Gristina has no criminal record, strong community ties, and faces a non-custodial sentence if convicted. It requests the court grant the writ and set reasonable bail.
Deputy Grafton County Attorney Tara Heater Tells Judge James O'Neill III How ...Rich Bergeron
Pay particular attention to how this "objection" is worded. Judge O'Neill ends up not only filing the fastest order in my favor in the history of the case, but he also writes it as if he's only addressing it to the prosecution. My initial motion asked for the judge to either schedule a prompt trial date or dismiss the case. It was not a motion to dismiss, but the mere mention of a suggested dismissal made Judge O'Neill act fast, and the language of the request criticizing him so vociferously obviously made him furious.
Indiana's Public Access Counselor says Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita's Office must turn over documents requested by Indy Politics publisher Abdul-Hakim Shabazz regarding Shabazz being banned from Rokita's news conferences.
Newtown Loses By Default Judgment- NECA -vs- KaaihueAngela Kaaihue
Newtown Loses By Default Judgment- NECA -vs- Kaaihue, a five year litigation and court battle. When NECA board of directors, and community are jealous for driving right by a property that could have been purchased, but was inherited by Angela Kaaihue, who has turned the property she inherited into a Hawaiian Gold Mine.
Hawaii Appellant Court Supreme Court judge castegnetti, judge jeffrey crabtree, judge karen t. nakasone, judge katherine g. leonard, judge keith hiraoka, judge lisa m. ginoza, judge sonja mccullen, judge clyde j. wadsworth, judge karen holma, judge gary W.B. chang
J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY LAWYER J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY LAWYER J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY LAWYER J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY LAWYER
Request for Entry of Default Judgment in favor for Angela KaaihueAngela Kaaihue
This document is a request for entry of default from Angela Sue Kaaihue and Yong Nam Fryer, who are pro se defendants and counter-claim plaintiffs, against Newtown Estates Community Association. It includes affidavits from Kaaihue and Fryer stating that the association failed to respond to their counter-claim within the required time period. It requests a default judgment of $43,450,000 including principal of $40 million, interest, costs and attorney's fees. Exhibits of the filed counter-claim and proofs of service are attached in support of the request.
This document is a motion filed by the State of Texas seeking to file a bill of complaint against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin challenging their administration of the 2020 presidential election. Texas alleges that these states unconstitutionally changed their election laws, resulting in significant irregularities. Texas argues that non-legislative actors improperly amended election statutes, treated voters differently in different areas, and weakened ballot integrity measures. Texas requests that the Supreme Court delay the deadline for states to certify electors to allow investigations into these issues.
Confessions of Judgement in Kyko Global Inc vs Madhavi Vuppalapati & Prithvi ...mh37o
The judgement was passed in favour of Plaintiffs Kyko Global Inc. Confessions of Judgement in Kyko Global Inc vs Madhavi Vuppalapati & Prithvi Info Solutions Ltd
This document provides summaries for 10 Kentucky statutes related to various legal topics:
1) School property ownership and approval of land purchases
2) Definition of nudists and exceptions
3) Operations of limited liability companies outside of Kentucky
4) Licensing and certification requirements for private fire investigators
5) Terms of imprisonment for first and second DUI offenders
6) Court's ability to seek advice and interview children in divorce/custody cases
7) Fines for corporate criminal convictions based on offense level
8) Restrictions on pawnbrokers receiving articles from minors or at night
9) Restrictions on removing books from libraries
10) Tax credits for thin seam coal based on mining location
This document is a judgment of divorce that:
1. Dissolves the marriage between the plaintiff and defendant due to irretrievable breakdown of the relationship.
2. Awards sole custody of the minor children to either the plaintiff or defendant, and establishes a visitation schedule.
3. Requires one party to pay child support and/or maintenance to the other party, including provisions for health insurance and unreimbursed medical expenses.
Court Says NJ Took Too Long For Subpoenas In FCA ClaimBrian Dickerson
The New Jersey Superior Court ruled that the state attorney general cannot subpoena former employees of a pharmacy benefits company that is the target of a False Claims Act suit because the deadline for the state to intervene had passed. The attorney general failed to declare intent to intervene within 60 days and did not act even after receiving 600 days of extensions. While the attorney general has power to investigate under the NJ False Claims Act, that authority expires when the right to intervene expires. The court found the attorney general's interpretation that investigations could continue indefinitely to be unsupported and absurd.
The document summarizes Wisconsin's implied consent and refusal laws. It provides:
1) A brief history of Wisconsin's drunk driving laws including the passage of the state's first implied consent law in 1969 which allowed license suspension for test refusal.
2) An overview of the implied consent process where drivers are deemed to consent to chemical testing upon arrest and penalties apply for refusal.
3) Details on the refusal hearing process where a defendant can request a hearing to challenge the refusal within 10 days or face automatic revocation. The issues considered are limited to probable cause for arrest, proper warnings by police, and whether a test was refused.
The United States Attorney's Office and defense counsel for Matthew Wade Beasley filed a stipulation requesting the court to extend two deadlines: 1) conducting a preliminary hearing within 14 days of the defendant's initial appearance and 2) filing an indictment within 30 days of arrest. The parties are attempting to resolve the matter before indictment through a pre-indictment plea agreement and need more time. The defendant consents to waiving his rights under the speedy trial act and rule 5.1 and extending the deadlines to allow for potential resolution. The parties request scheduling the preliminary hearing 120 days from the date of the filing.
FOIA, protective order, law brief, Darren-Chaker, notes many of the legal cases in brief fit the facts of the case before the court. Often times the law allows attorney fees to the prevailing party.
Thomas Woznicki vs. Dennis Erickson (Wisconsin Supreme Court Ruling)SteveJohnson125
This is a 1996 Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling pertaining to a former New Richmond High School teacher named Thomas Woznicki who successfully fought to prevent the release of his personnel and telephone records. The ruling established the “Woznicki Notice” precedent, which gives public employees in Wisconsin the right to challenge the release of certain public records.
MALAYSIAN LEGAL SYSTEM Administration of justice intro civil jurisdictionxareejx
This document outlines the court system in Malaysia. It discusses the hierarchy and jurisdiction of the different courts, including the subordinate courts (sessions court and magistrates court), the high courts, court of appeal, and federal court. It also discusses some of the laws governing the courts, such as the Courts of Judicature Act 1964, Subordinate Courts Act 1948, and Child Act 2001. Key details provided include the jurisdiction and powers of each court level, as well as rules around appeals.
This verified complaint alleges medical malpractice and wrongful death on behalf of parents against a hospital and doctor. It alleges the infant plaintiff received negligent medical care and treatment from defendants that caused injuries and death. The complaint brings four causes of action: 1) medical malpractice, 2) wrongful death, 3) lack of informed consent, and 4) loss of services as parents. It seeks monetary damages exceeding the jurisdiction of lower courts for each cause of action.
Immigration lawsuits and the apa the basics of a district court actionUmesh Heendeniya
The document provides an overview of bringing an Administrative Procedure Act (APA) lawsuit in federal district court to challenge unlawful immigration agency actions outside of removal proceedings. It discusses that:
1) The APA allows individuals to sue the US government for non-monetary relief over unlawful agency actions. Suits are brought in federal district court.
2) Successful APA lawsuits have challenged various immigration agency decisions such as visa denials and delays in application processing.
3) The statute of limitations is six years under the general statute for suits against the US government. Jurisdiction is based on the federal question statute and the APA waives sovereign immunity.
This document provides notice of appeal by Intervenor-Defendants Philip E. Berger, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate, and Timothy K. Moore, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives, to the Court of Appeals of North Carolina from an order entered on November 10, 2011 by Judge W. David Lee in the case of Hoke County Board of Education v. State of North Carolina. The notice was filed on December 8, 2021 and certifies service of the notice to various parties in the case.
The parties have agreed to voluntarily dismiss the case Abdul-Hakim Shabazz v. Todd Rokita in its entirety without prejudice. Each party has agreed to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. Additionally, the parties have stipulated that the plaintiff will not be barred from future in-person press conferences held by the defendant and will be allowed admission under the same terms and conditions as other press or media.
The document is a motion filed by the defense attorney Ralph Megna on behalf of their client, who has been indicted on drug and paraphernalia charges. The motion requests several forms of relief from the court, including inspection of grand jury minutes, dismissal of indictment, a Huntley hearing on statements made by the defendant, a Wade hearing on identification procedures, disclosure of Brady material, a Sandoval hearing, and leave to make further motions. The attorney provides supporting arguments for each request.
Answering Brief by Newtown Estates Community AssociationAngela Kaaihue
Answering Brief by Newtown Estates Community Association
ANGELA KAAIHUE -VS- NEWTOWN ESTATES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION- OPENING BRIEF CAAP-19-0000806
NEWTOWN ESTATES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
Hawaii Appellant Court Supreme Court judge castegnetti, judge jeffrey crabtree, judge karen t. nakasone, judge katherine g. leonard, judge keith hiraoka, judge lisa m. ginoza, judge sonja mccullen, judge clyde j. wadsworth, judge karen holma, judge gary W.B. chang
Online version black and white motion practice in criminal trials power point...jjohnsebastianattorney
This document provides guidance on various pre-trial motions in criminal cases, including omnibus motions, motions to dismiss or reduce charges, and motions to suppress evidence. It discusses the timeline and requirements for filing pre-trial motions under the Criminal Procedure Law. The document also provides sample motion templates and analyses of key cases related to ineffective assistance of counsel during the plea bargaining process.
Este documento resume la Ley de Análisis de ADN Post Sentencia en Puerto Rico. Explica que la ley permite solicitar análisis de ADN de nueva evidencia tanto para el gobierno como la defensa para comprobar si existe una legítima duda sobre los resultados originales. También describe el Proyecto Inocencia de Puerto Rico, el cual ha logrado la exoneración de personas erróneamente condenadas a través del análisis de ADN. Finalmente, provee detalles sobre los tipos de delitos elegibles y evidencia que puede ser analizada bajo esta le
Brondino gustavo vis∆o hiperb¢rea da hist¢riajoao_schramm
O documento discute a mitologia grega como uma fonte histórica dos mitos hiperbóreos. Aponta que os mitos estão presentes em todas as mitologias dos povos ários e descrevem estratégias para a libertação espiritual. Também destaca a importância do pensamento mitológico na história e como a Grécia desenvolveu posteriormente uma gnose filosófica.
J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY LAWYER J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY LAWYER J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY LAWYER J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY LAWYER
Request for Entry of Default Judgment in favor for Angela KaaihueAngela Kaaihue
This document is a request for entry of default from Angela Sue Kaaihue and Yong Nam Fryer, who are pro se defendants and counter-claim plaintiffs, against Newtown Estates Community Association. It includes affidavits from Kaaihue and Fryer stating that the association failed to respond to their counter-claim within the required time period. It requests a default judgment of $43,450,000 including principal of $40 million, interest, costs and attorney's fees. Exhibits of the filed counter-claim and proofs of service are attached in support of the request.
This document is a motion filed by the State of Texas seeking to file a bill of complaint against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin challenging their administration of the 2020 presidential election. Texas alleges that these states unconstitutionally changed their election laws, resulting in significant irregularities. Texas argues that non-legislative actors improperly amended election statutes, treated voters differently in different areas, and weakened ballot integrity measures. Texas requests that the Supreme Court delay the deadline for states to certify electors to allow investigations into these issues.
Confessions of Judgement in Kyko Global Inc vs Madhavi Vuppalapati & Prithvi ...mh37o
The judgement was passed in favour of Plaintiffs Kyko Global Inc. Confessions of Judgement in Kyko Global Inc vs Madhavi Vuppalapati & Prithvi Info Solutions Ltd
This document provides summaries for 10 Kentucky statutes related to various legal topics:
1) School property ownership and approval of land purchases
2) Definition of nudists and exceptions
3) Operations of limited liability companies outside of Kentucky
4) Licensing and certification requirements for private fire investigators
5) Terms of imprisonment for first and second DUI offenders
6) Court's ability to seek advice and interview children in divorce/custody cases
7) Fines for corporate criminal convictions based on offense level
8) Restrictions on pawnbrokers receiving articles from minors or at night
9) Restrictions on removing books from libraries
10) Tax credits for thin seam coal based on mining location
This document is a judgment of divorce that:
1. Dissolves the marriage between the plaintiff and defendant due to irretrievable breakdown of the relationship.
2. Awards sole custody of the minor children to either the plaintiff or defendant, and establishes a visitation schedule.
3. Requires one party to pay child support and/or maintenance to the other party, including provisions for health insurance and unreimbursed medical expenses.
Court Says NJ Took Too Long For Subpoenas In FCA ClaimBrian Dickerson
The New Jersey Superior Court ruled that the state attorney general cannot subpoena former employees of a pharmacy benefits company that is the target of a False Claims Act suit because the deadline for the state to intervene had passed. The attorney general failed to declare intent to intervene within 60 days and did not act even after receiving 600 days of extensions. While the attorney general has power to investigate under the NJ False Claims Act, that authority expires when the right to intervene expires. The court found the attorney general's interpretation that investigations could continue indefinitely to be unsupported and absurd.
The document summarizes Wisconsin's implied consent and refusal laws. It provides:
1) A brief history of Wisconsin's drunk driving laws including the passage of the state's first implied consent law in 1969 which allowed license suspension for test refusal.
2) An overview of the implied consent process where drivers are deemed to consent to chemical testing upon arrest and penalties apply for refusal.
3) Details on the refusal hearing process where a defendant can request a hearing to challenge the refusal within 10 days or face automatic revocation. The issues considered are limited to probable cause for arrest, proper warnings by police, and whether a test was refused.
The United States Attorney's Office and defense counsel for Matthew Wade Beasley filed a stipulation requesting the court to extend two deadlines: 1) conducting a preliminary hearing within 14 days of the defendant's initial appearance and 2) filing an indictment within 30 days of arrest. The parties are attempting to resolve the matter before indictment through a pre-indictment plea agreement and need more time. The defendant consents to waiving his rights under the speedy trial act and rule 5.1 and extending the deadlines to allow for potential resolution. The parties request scheduling the preliminary hearing 120 days from the date of the filing.
FOIA, protective order, law brief, Darren-Chaker, notes many of the legal cases in brief fit the facts of the case before the court. Often times the law allows attorney fees to the prevailing party.
Thomas Woznicki vs. Dennis Erickson (Wisconsin Supreme Court Ruling)SteveJohnson125
This is a 1996 Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling pertaining to a former New Richmond High School teacher named Thomas Woznicki who successfully fought to prevent the release of his personnel and telephone records. The ruling established the “Woznicki Notice” precedent, which gives public employees in Wisconsin the right to challenge the release of certain public records.
MALAYSIAN LEGAL SYSTEM Administration of justice intro civil jurisdictionxareejx
This document outlines the court system in Malaysia. It discusses the hierarchy and jurisdiction of the different courts, including the subordinate courts (sessions court and magistrates court), the high courts, court of appeal, and federal court. It also discusses some of the laws governing the courts, such as the Courts of Judicature Act 1964, Subordinate Courts Act 1948, and Child Act 2001. Key details provided include the jurisdiction and powers of each court level, as well as rules around appeals.
This verified complaint alleges medical malpractice and wrongful death on behalf of parents against a hospital and doctor. It alleges the infant plaintiff received negligent medical care and treatment from defendants that caused injuries and death. The complaint brings four causes of action: 1) medical malpractice, 2) wrongful death, 3) lack of informed consent, and 4) loss of services as parents. It seeks monetary damages exceeding the jurisdiction of lower courts for each cause of action.
Immigration lawsuits and the apa the basics of a district court actionUmesh Heendeniya
The document provides an overview of bringing an Administrative Procedure Act (APA) lawsuit in federal district court to challenge unlawful immigration agency actions outside of removal proceedings. It discusses that:
1) The APA allows individuals to sue the US government for non-monetary relief over unlawful agency actions. Suits are brought in federal district court.
2) Successful APA lawsuits have challenged various immigration agency decisions such as visa denials and delays in application processing.
3) The statute of limitations is six years under the general statute for suits against the US government. Jurisdiction is based on the federal question statute and the APA waives sovereign immunity.
This document provides notice of appeal by Intervenor-Defendants Philip E. Berger, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate, and Timothy K. Moore, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives, to the Court of Appeals of North Carolina from an order entered on November 10, 2011 by Judge W. David Lee in the case of Hoke County Board of Education v. State of North Carolina. The notice was filed on December 8, 2021 and certifies service of the notice to various parties in the case.
The parties have agreed to voluntarily dismiss the case Abdul-Hakim Shabazz v. Todd Rokita in its entirety without prejudice. Each party has agreed to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. Additionally, the parties have stipulated that the plaintiff will not be barred from future in-person press conferences held by the defendant and will be allowed admission under the same terms and conditions as other press or media.
The document is a motion filed by the defense attorney Ralph Megna on behalf of their client, who has been indicted on drug and paraphernalia charges. The motion requests several forms of relief from the court, including inspection of grand jury minutes, dismissal of indictment, a Huntley hearing on statements made by the defendant, a Wade hearing on identification procedures, disclosure of Brady material, a Sandoval hearing, and leave to make further motions. The attorney provides supporting arguments for each request.
Answering Brief by Newtown Estates Community AssociationAngela Kaaihue
Answering Brief by Newtown Estates Community Association
ANGELA KAAIHUE -VS- NEWTOWN ESTATES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION- OPENING BRIEF CAAP-19-0000806
NEWTOWN ESTATES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
Hawaii Appellant Court Supreme Court judge castegnetti, judge jeffrey crabtree, judge karen t. nakasone, judge katherine g. leonard, judge keith hiraoka, judge lisa m. ginoza, judge sonja mccullen, judge clyde j. wadsworth, judge karen holma, judge gary W.B. chang
Online version black and white motion practice in criminal trials power point...jjohnsebastianattorney
This document provides guidance on various pre-trial motions in criminal cases, including omnibus motions, motions to dismiss or reduce charges, and motions to suppress evidence. It discusses the timeline and requirements for filing pre-trial motions under the Criminal Procedure Law. The document also provides sample motion templates and analyses of key cases related to ineffective assistance of counsel during the plea bargaining process.
Este documento resume la Ley de Análisis de ADN Post Sentencia en Puerto Rico. Explica que la ley permite solicitar análisis de ADN de nueva evidencia tanto para el gobierno como la defensa para comprobar si existe una legítima duda sobre los resultados originales. También describe el Proyecto Inocencia de Puerto Rico, el cual ha logrado la exoneración de personas erróneamente condenadas a través del análisis de ADN. Finalmente, provee detalles sobre los tipos de delitos elegibles y evidencia que puede ser analizada bajo esta le
Brondino gustavo vis∆o hiperb¢rea da hist¢riajoao_schramm
O documento discute a mitologia grega como uma fonte histórica dos mitos hiperbóreos. Aponta que os mitos estão presentes em todas as mitologias dos povos ários e descrevem estratégias para a libertação espiritual. Também destaca a importância do pensamento mitológico na história e como a Grécia desenvolveu posteriormente uma gnose filosófica.
La lista enumera las 8 películas de Harry Potter lanzadas hasta la fecha, comenzando con la precuela "Criaturas fantásticas y donde encontrarlas" y luego las 7 películas basadas en los libros de J.K. Rowling que cubren la historia de Harry desde su primer año en Hogwarts hasta su batalla final contra Lord Voldemort, concluyendo con la adaptación de la novela final en dos partes. El documento finaliza señalando posibles películas adicionales en el futuro basadas en rumores.
La Unión Europea ha acordado un paquete de sanciones contra Rusia por su invasión de Ucrania. Las sanciones incluyen restricciones a las transacciones con bancos rusos clave y la prohibición de la venta de aviones y equipos a Rusia. Los líderes de la UE también acordaron excluir a varios bancos rusos del sistema SWIFT de mensajería financiera.
The area of law dealing with the use of computers and the Internet and the exchange of communications and information thereon, including related issues concerning such communications and information as the protection of intellectual property rights, freedom of speech, and public access to information called cyber law.
El documento habla brevemente sobre el verano y las reuniones, mencionando dos temas clave de la temporada de verano y las actividades sociales con otros.
El documento describe lo que hace un coach de negocios. Un coach puede dar una perspectiva objetiva y compartir experiencias de trabajar con otros negocios para ayudar a los dueños a alcanzar su máximo potencial. Al igual que un entrenador deportivo, un coach reconoce el potencial de un negocio y proporciona las herramientas y motivación para llevarlo al siguiente nivel enfocándose en el tiempo, el equipo y el dinero.
The document discusses the field of medical robotics and the potential impacts of increased use of medical robots. It notes that while films often depict robots destroying humanity, medical robots instead focus on rebuilding and repairing through minimally invasive surgeries. The Da Vinci robot pioneered this field with over 2,000 systems in the US helping to perform surgeries more efficiently. China also seeks to develop its own medical robots both for healthcare and the lucrative market. Increased use of medical robots could impact jobs and healthcare systems, but may also create new opportunities as technology advances.
El menú incluye abrebocas como deditos de pescado con tres salsas, el plato principal consiste en arroz con guandu, plátano, ensalada de papas, zanahorias y remolacha, filete de pescado al ajillo y medio libra de filete de ternera con papas. Las bebidas son jugos de kist roja, manzana, piña y uva así como gaseosas Coca-cola, Pepsi y ginger ale.
The document proposes a design for an Alzheimer's research and treatment center based on synaptic connections in the brain. It describes how the building layout would guide patients along a trajectory through interconnected program spaces, similar to how synapses connect neurons. This "synaptic overlay" is intended to help patients better retain spatial memory as their disease reduces synaptic activity in the brain. The design also aims to promote interaction between patients, researchers, and doctors to provide mental stimulation for patients and more direct understanding of patients for researchers.
Google Docs, Sheets, and Slides are free, web-based office apps that allow users to create and edit documents, spreadsheets, and presentations online and collaborate with others in real time. While traditionally lacking some features of Microsoft Office, Google Docs is praised for its simplicity, ease of collaboration, and frequent updates. It allows multiple simultaneous editors to view character-by-character changes and discuss edits through an in-document chat sidebar. Documents can be opened on any device with a supported browser through mobile apps or the web interface.
L2 Specialties installed Klein Sliding Glass installation for Quartus Engineering in San Diego. Architect was ACI, Architectural Concepts Inc and GC was Prevost Construction.
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty provides enhanced accuracy in femoral rotation and tibiofemoral alignment compared to conventional surgery. However, conventional surgery is quicker and less expensive than robotic-assisted surgery. While robotic-assisted surgery achieves better short-term alignment results, both procedures show no significant differences in functional outcomes after two years.
Los videos exploran la batalla ideológica entre las teorías económicas de John Maynard Keynes y Friedrich Hayek desde principios del siglo XX. Keynes apoyaba la intervención estatal para estabilizar la economía, mientras que Hayek favorecía los mercados libres. A lo largo del siglo, las ideas de ambos economistas influyeron en las políticas aplicadas por diferentes países y en la evolución del sistema económico mundial hacia la globalización.
Este documento presenta información sobre habilidades sociales e inteligencia emocional en ambientes universitarios. Se discuten conceptos como enfoques de psicología clínica y social, dimensiones cognitivas y conductuales, modelos de entendimiento del entorno y estrategias de desarrollo de habilidades. También se describen aspectos intrapersonales e interpersonales, la comunicación asertiva, los tipos de motivación, la solución de problemas y el liderazgo situacional.
This document discusses different types of DC generators, including series, shunt, and compound generators. It provides the following key details:
1. Series generators have a rising voltage characteristic where voltage increases with load, but voltage starts decreasing at high loads due to armature reaction demagnetizing effects.
2. Shunt generators have a constant voltage characteristic, but voltage decreases slightly with increasing load due to armature reaction and armature drop. Adding a few series field coils can make the voltage substantially constant or rising.
3. Compound generators have both shunt and series field windings, allowing their external characteristics to be adjusted to compensate for line voltage drops. Flat-compound generators aim for constant voltage,
En este libro ofrezco un estudio, basado principalmente en documentos inéditos, de una Orden Mágica actualmente famosa, la Orden Hermética de la Golden Dawn, cuyo apogeo tuvo lugar entre 1890 y 1900, aunque hasta mucho
después sobrevivieran varias Ordenes que la sucedieron.
Mi objetivo ha sido investigar los orígenes, la organización y, sobre todo, la historia interna de una moderna cofradía mágica representativa. Hubo en ella personas que se
dedicaron a actividades fuera de lo común. Quise saber quiénes fueron, qué hicieron y qué lograron, y cómo reaccionaron ante situaciones insólitas, al menos según criterios normales. No he intentado describir ni explicar con amplitud los rituales ni las enseñanzas mágicas de la Orden porque se puede disponer de este material a lo largo de más de mil páginas de la obra del doctor Regardie, The Golden Dawn.
This document summarizes the process for appealing court decisions in Kansas. It discusses the types of rulings that can be appealed as of right, such as final judgments, injunctions, and orders involving the constitution. It also outlines the process for appealing these decisions, which involves filing a notice of appeal within 30 days. The document also discusses appealing interlocutory orders by permission, which requires the trial court to state the order involves a controlling legal issue and could expedite the case, and then filing an application for permission to appeal within 14 days. The appellate courts in Kansas are limited to reviewing questions of law and whether facts are supported by evidence.
This document summarizes the procedures for responding to a civil complaint filed in Kansas state court. It addresses the timeline for filing a response, options for extending the deadline, and types of allowable responses such as an answer, motion to dismiss, or motion for a more definite statement. It provides details on filing pre-answer motions and the procedures that apply, including requirements for papers, the plaintiff's response, optional reply, and whether oral argument or discovery are stayed pending the decision. If a pre-answer motion is denied, the defendant must file a response within 14 days.
know-how that gives lawyers a
This document summarizes the process for appealing a decision of an intermediate appellate court to the highest court in Kansas. It addresses starting an appeal as of right or by permission, obtaining a stay pending appeal, submitting briefs and an appendix, and participating in oral arguments. The summary provides that a party can appeal as of right if a constitutional question is raised for the first time, and can appeal by permission for other rulings. It outlines the procedures for filing a petition for review, responding, and submitting supplemental briefs. Oral argument is available unless the case does not present a new legal question or argument would not be helpful. Parties have 30 minutes or less for oral argument
The document discusses the structure and jurisdiction of the United States federal court system. It begins with an overview of the main components, including 94 U.S. District Courts, 13 U.S. Courts of Appeals, and the 1 U.S. Supreme Court. It then covers the jurisdiction and authority of federal courts to hear cases involving federal laws/treaties or disputes between states/citizens of different states. The remainder discusses aspects like the process of becoming a Supreme Court justice and potential reforms around lifetime appointments.
The federal court system is established by Article III of the Constitution. The federal courts have jurisdiction over cases involving the Constitution, federal law, disputes between states or citizens of different states, and disputes involving foreign governments. The lower federal courts include district courts and courts of appeals. District courts handle most cases and have original jurisdiction, while courts of appeals only hear appeals from lower courts. The highest court is the Supreme Court, which has the power of judicial review to determine the constitutionality of laws and final authority on interpreting the Constitution.
REPLY BRIEF FILED BY ANGELA KAAIHUE -VS- NECAAngela Kaaihue
ANGELA KAAIHUE'S REPLY BRIEF IN APPEALLANT COURT, CAAP-19-0000806 VERSUS NEWTOWN ESTATES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
HAWAII LAND COURT JUDGE GARY CHAN
CORRUPTION AT IT'S FINEST, Judge CrabTree, Judge Holma, Judge Sonja M. P. McCullen, Hawaii Chief Judge Lisa Ginoza, Hawaii Associate Judge Keith Hiraoka, Hawaii Judge Katherine G. Leonard, Hawaii Judge Karen T. Nakasone, Hawaii Judge Clyde J. Wadsworth
SharonsDefaultJudgmentvsCitySt.Paul,MN 5 jul07ratasslegal 22Sharon Anderson
Sharon Anderson aka Peterson Scarrella decades fighting City St. Paul,MN Filing for Office to Make Government Accountable current on the MN Ballot Republican 4 MN Attorney General http://sharon4mnag.blogspot.com Civil Rights Activist Forensic Files also at http://sharon4anderson.org
The chapter discusses the U.S. court system, which consists of both federal and state courts. At the top is the U.S. Supreme Court, which has the power to review all other courts. Below are the federal courts, organized into four tiers - magistrate courts, district courts, courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court. States each have their own court systems that generally mirror the federal structure. Courts hear both criminal cases involving the government and civil cases between private parties.
Slide show prepared for a series of lectures on the Federal Judiciary for PS 101 American Government at the University of Kentucky, Fall 2007. Dr. Christopher S. Rice, Lecturer.
The document discusses the American legal system, including its system of checks and balances between the three branches of government. It describes the federal and state court systems, from trial courts up to the Supreme Court. It also covers the jurisdiction of courts, the types of cases heard in civil and criminal courts, and how legal analysis is conducted of the constitution, statutes, regulations, and common law.
The document discusses the structure and functions of the US judicial branch. It explains that federal courts handle cases involving violations of federal law and disputes between states. It also discusses the different levels of federal courts, from district courts to circuit courts to the Supreme Court. The document also covers judicial philosophies like judicial activism versus restraint and how Supreme Court rulings can act as de facto law through precedent.
The federal judiciary in the United States consists of trial courts called U.S. District Courts, appellate courts called U.S. Courts of Appeals, and the Supreme Court of the United States. Federal courts have jurisdiction over cases involving the Constitution, federal laws and treaties, disputes between states, and controversies where the U.S. government is a party. District courts have original jurisdiction to hear cases first, while appellate courts have appellate jurisdiction to hear cases on appeal from district courts based on legal issues rather than factual questions. Precedent from past cases guides future court decisions through principles like stare decisis. The Supreme Court has discretionary appellate jurisdiction and can review lower court decisions through a writ of certiorari.
Top of FormWEEK 5 SUPREME COURT Lesson Lesson 5 Th.docxedwardmarivel
Top of Form
WEEK 5: SUPREME COURT
Lesson
Lesson 5: The Supreme Court
"A law embodies beliefs that have triumphed in the battle of ideas.”
-Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes
Expected Outcomes
To understand the evolution of the Supreme Court in relation to the other branches of power; to appreciate the difference between the “original intent” and “judicial activist” philosophies; and to critically evaluate the political and cultural importance of major Supreme Court decisions.
Overview
I. The Legal Framework
Most American laws are based on the English legal system. The body of judge-made law is referred to as common law. The U.S. Constitution, State Constitutions and statutes - laws passed by Congress or State Legislatures - are sources upon which American law is founded. Common law countries around the world include: United States; Britain, Australia, Canada, India, and New Zealand.
The United States utilizes a dual court system which is comprised of both State and Federal Courts. The rules and principles which are the basis of court decisions are referred to as Case Law. Case law has bearing on future cases that involve similar facts and constitutional issues. The case law or court rule from previous cases establishes the precedents on which future cases will be relied upon in the decision making process. The doctrine of stare decisis means to stand on the decided cases.
A courts authority to hear and decide cases refers to the jurisdiction of the court. According to the Constitution, the accused must receive a fair trial in the jurisdiction in which the crime was committed. Federal Courts have jurisdiction when there is a federal question in the case, when there is diversity of citizenship involved in the case (meaning citizens from different states), and when there are two or more different states or state boundaries involved. When a case is to be heard in Federal Court, courts with limited jurisdiction include Tax and Bankruptcy Courts. These are examples of courts that deal with very specialized issues that do not deal with constitutional issues, but other federal issues.
II. The Judicial Powers
According to Article III of the Constitution, the judicial power of the United States would be vested in one Supreme Court. The actual authority of the Supreme Court was described as:
· “The Judicial power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority; to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party; to Controversies between two or more States; between a State and Citizens of another State; between Citizens of different States; between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizen ...
The American Judicial System by Dr. Fred C. LunenburgWilliam Kritsonis
The document discusses the American judicial system, which consists of federal and state courts. The federal court system is based on the US Constitution and includes district courts, circuit courts of appeal, and the Supreme Court. State court systems are based on state constitutions and laws and generally include courts of limited jurisdiction, courts of general jurisdiction, intermediate appellate courts, and a state supreme court. Both federal and state courts have played an important role in interpreting laws relating to schools.
This presentation deals with SCOTUS in detail and uncovered all aspects of it's working ,powers etc.It is beneficial for law students who take US Constitution as their minor subject in their course.
Wisconsin: Mailed Ballots Must Once Again Be Returned By Election Day, Court ...Baker Publishing Company
Mailed ballots in Wisconsin must be received by elections officials by election day, Nov. 3, to be counted, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday in a reversal of a previous decision that would have given extra time for ballots to be counted through Nov. 9 so long as they were postmarked by Nov. 3.
The latest ruling in the case, which may well be challenged at the US Supreme Court, means the deadline for absentee ballots to arrive remains at 8 p.m. on election day as is spelled out under state law. Judge William Conley, a federal judge in Wisconsin’s Western District, initially extended to Nov. 9 the deadline for ballots to arrive at local election clerks’ offices to account for an expected surge in mail-in ballots due to the coronavirus pandemic and anticipated mail service slowdowns caused in part by President Donald Trump and Postmaster Louis DeJoy’s intentional throttling of the US Postal Service ahead of the election.
The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005,Reed R. Kathrein, Esq.
San Francisco, California
Reed.Kathrein@gmail.com
Reedkathrein.com
CLE International – 3rd Class Actions Annual Conference
January 25-26, 2007 Los Angeles, California
Charfauros bus415 wk2. Copyright 2013 Edward F. T. Charfauros. Reference, www...Edward F. T. Charfauros
Edward F. T. Charfauros, inspiring author, assists fellow students with their presentation for a successful grade. He also blogs upon his own inspiring blog, where you'll discover life changing stuff. Sign up for his blog by sending him an email~
Copyright 2013 Edward F. T. Charfauros. Reference, www.YourBlogorResume.net.
THE TORT OF OUTRAGE IN KANSAS - INVOKING A COURT'S THRESHOLD DETERMINATIONAmy Morgan
This document discusses who may attend depositions under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and case law. It begins by outlining the issue of non-parties attempting to attend depositions and the purpose of determining their eligibility. It then analyzes Rule 615 of the Federal Rules of Evidence regarding excluding witnesses at trial and compares this to Rule 26(c)(5) of the FRCP regarding seeking a protective order to exclude individuals from depositions. The document also discusses the split among courts on whether Rule 615 applies to depositions or if Rule 26(c)(5) alone governs. It concludes by examining how these rules have been applied regarding parties to an action attending their own or other depositions.
The Indispensible Local Counsel - Partnering with Lead Counsel in Kansas Liti...Amy Morgan
This document discusses best practices for attorneys serving as local counsel in complex litigation in Kansas courts. It outlines 10 key principles for local counsel to follow, including clearly understanding their role, fulfilling duties beyond just signing court filings, offering involvement in meetings with opposing counsel, knowing local rules inside and out, providing evaluative information on judges and juries, respecting the relationship between lead counsel and their client, supporting defense strategies, deferring to lead counsel's expertise, hosting lead counsel well, and serving lead counsel with grace and humility. Following these practices will help local counsel develop a productive working relationship with lead counsel and contribute effectively to positive case outcomes.
The document summarizes the statutes of limitation for various commercial claims under Kansas law, including:
- The statute of limitations is 3 years for account stated and antitrust claims, 5 years for express contracts, 3 years for oral contracts, 4 years for UCC breach of contract claims, and 2 years for breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, and fraud claims.
- The limitations period begins at the time of the breach for most contract and commercial claims, and when the injury becomes reasonably ascertainable for tort claims like conversion and fraud. Discovery rules and tolling may also apply to determine accrual date in some cases.
KBA CLE Attract and Retain Top Attorney TalentAmy Morgan
This document discusses strategies for law firms to attract and retain top attorney talent, especially women. It notes that while law school graduates are now evenly split between men and women, women remain underrepresented at the partnership level. Common reasons for women leaving law firms include difficulties balancing work and family responsibilities given the billable hours model and lack of flexibility. The document also cites lack of mentoring, fewer opportunities for business development, and bias in work assignments and perceptions of commitment as contributing factors. It stresses the importance of effective flexibility policies, mentorship programs, and diversity initiatives to support women's advancement and reduce attrition rates.
Informal Discovery - Simple Strategies for Cost-Effective LitigationAmy Morgan
The document discusses strategies for informal discovery that can help reduce litigation costs. It defines informal discovery as obtaining factual information without formal requests to opposing counsel. Some benefits of informal discovery include not requiring cooperation from the opposition, being unconstrained by discovery schedules, and potentially revealing key evidence. The document provides examples of informal discovery methods like searching online court dockets, secretary of state websites, social media sites, paid databases, witness interviews, public records requests, and speaking with opposing counsel. It emphasizes keeping informal discovery budget-conscious and within ethical rules.
Informal Discovery Simple Strategies for Cost-Effective LitigationAmy Morgan
The document discusses strategies for informal discovery that can help reduce litigation costs. Informal discovery involves obtaining factual information without formal requests to opposing counsel and includes searching online court dockets, secretary of state websites, social media sites, and conducting fee-based searches and witness interviews. Examples are provided that show how informal discovery uncovered crucial information that altered cases, such as finding contradictory testimony or establishing a party was not properly registered. Keeping discovery costs low while still obtaining necessary information benefits budget-conscious clients.