SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 41
1
Academic Ranking of World Universities
Methodologies and Problems
August, 2008August, 2008
By Professor Nian Cai LIUBy Professor Nian Cai LIU
Center for World-Class Universities, Graduate School of EducationCenter for World-Class Universities, Graduate School of Education
Shanghai Jiao Tong University, ChinaShanghai Jiao Tong University, China
2
Outline
Purposes1
Methodologies & Results2
Problems & Discussion33
Ranking by Subject Fields44
35 Final Remarks5
3
PurposesPurposes
4
Dream of Chinese for WCU
 World-class university (WCU) is a dream for
generations of Chinese. It’s not only for pride, but also
for the future of China.
 Recently, Chinese government has launched several
initiatives for research universities. The best-known one
is specially designed to build WCU (985 Project).
5
Goals of Top Chinese Universities
 Many top Chinese universities have setup their
strategic goals as WCU.
 Most of them have also set time tables for achieving the
goal of WCU. For example:
2016 for Peking University
2020 for Tsinghua University
6
Questions About WCU
 Is there a clear definition for WCU?
 How many WCU should there be in the world?
 What are the positions of top Chinese universities in
the world?
 How can Chinese universities improve themselves to
reach the goal of WCU?
7
Academic Ranking of World Universities
 Our original purpose of doing the Academic Ranking of
World Universities (ARWU) was to find out the position
of Chinese universities in the world and the gap between
them and WCU.
 ARWU was put on the internet upon the encouragement
of colleagues from all over the world.
8
Features of ARWU
 ARWU uses a few carefully selected, objective criteria and
internationally comparable data that everyone could
verify in some way.
 It has been carried out by a ranking team of four
researchers at Shanghai Jiao Tong University for their
academic interests.
 It has been done independently without any financial
support from any external sources.
9
MethodologiesMethodologies
& Results& Results
10
Selection of Universities
 Any university that has any Nobel Laureates, Fields
Medals, Highly Cited Researchers, or papers published
in Nature or Science.
 Major universities of every country with significant
amount of papers indexed by Thomson.
 Number of universities scanned: >2000
 Number of universities actually ranked: >1000
 Number of ranked universities on our web: 500
11
Ranking Criteria and Weights
12
Definition of Indicator: Alumni
 The total number of the alumni of an institution
winning Nobel Prizes and Fields Medals.
 Alumni are defined as those who obtain bachelor,
Master’s or doctoral degrees from the institution.
 Different weights are set according to the periods of
obtaining degrees. The weight is 100% for alumni of
1991-2000, 90% for alumni of 1981-1990, 80% for
alumni of 1971-1980, and so on.
 If a person obtains more than one degrees from an
institution, the institution is considered once only.
13
Definition of Indicator: Award
 The total number of the staff of an institution winning Nobel
prizes in physics, chemistry, medicine and economics and Fields
Medal in Mathematics.
 Staff is defined as those who work at an institution at the time of
winning the prize.
 Different weights are set according to the periods of winning the
prizes. The weight is 100% for winners since 2001, 90% for
winners in 1991-2000, 80% for winners in 1981-1990, 70% for
winners in 1971-1980, and so on.
 If a winner is affiliated with more than one institution, each
institution is assigned the reciprocal of the number of institutions.
 For Nobel prizes, if a prize is shared by more than one person,
weights are set for winners according to their proportion of prize.
14
Definition of Indicator: HiCi
 The number of highly cited researchers in 21 broad
subject categories in life sciences, medicine, physical
sciences, engineering and social sciences.
 The definition of categories and detailed procedures
can be found at the website of Institute of Scientific
Information.
 The total number of HiCi is about 5000, about 4000
of which is university staff.
15
Definition of Indicator: N&S
 The annual average number of articles published in
Nature and Science in the past five years.
 To distinguish the order of author affiliation, a
weight of 100% is assigned for corresponding
author, 50% for first author (second author if the
first author is the same as corresponding author),
25% for the next author, and 10% for other
authors.
 Only publications of article type are considered.
16
Definition of Indicator: PUB
 Total number of articles indexed in Science Citation
Index-expanded (SCIE) and Social Science Citation
Index (SSCI) in the past year.
 A weight of 2 is assigned to articles indexed in SSCI
to compensate the bias against humanities and social
sciences.
 Only publications of article type are considered.
17
Definition of Indicator: PCP
 The sub-total scores of the above five indicators
divided by the number of full-time equivalent
academic staff.
 If the number of academic staff for institutions of a
country cannot be obtained, the total scores of the
above five indicators is used.
 For ranking 2005, the number of full-time equivalent
academic staff is obtained for institutions in USA,
China, Australia, Italy, Netherlands, Sweden, and
Belgium etc.
18
Main Sources of Data
 Nobel laureates:
http://www.nobel.se
 Fields Medals:
http://www.mathunion.org/medals/
 Highly-cited researchers:
http://www.isihighlycited.com
 Articles published in Nature and Science:
http://www.isiknowledge.com
 Articles indexed in SCIE and SSCI:
http://www.isiknowledge.com
19
Results of ARWU
 http://www.arwu.org/
 Top 500 universities in the world
 Top 100 universities in North and Latin America
 Top 100 universities in Asia/Oceania
 Top 100 universities in Europe
 Statistics of top universities by region and country
 Percentage distribution of top universities by country
as compared with the share of global population and
GDP
20
ProblemsProblems &&
DiscussionDiscussion
21
Methodological: Education and Service
 Education is the basic function of any university,
however, it would be impossible to rank the quality of
education due to the huge differences among the national
systems.
 Contribution to the national economic development is
becoming increasingly important for universities,
however, it is impossible to obtain internationally
comparable indicators and data.
 The academic or research performance of universities, a
good indication of their reputation, can be ranked
internationally.
22
Methodological: Humanities & Social Sciences
 Many well-known institutions specialized in humanities
and social sciences are ranked relatively low.
 Since 2004, the indicator of N&S is not considered for
institutions specialized in humanities and social sciences,
its weight is relocated to other indicators.
 Since 2005, a weight of 2 for articles indexed by SSCI is
considered.
 Nevertheless, if a university specialized in social sciences
and humanities had Nobel Laureates in economics and
Highly Cited Researchers in social sciences, it should have
good standing.
23
Methodological: Language Bias
 English is the language of international academic
community.
 Any ranking based on academic performance will be
biased towards institutions in English-speaking
countries.
 One possible solution: papers published in non-native
languages are offered a special weight.
 Another possible solution: normalization of total
articles by the proportion of journal editors of each
country.
24
Methodological: Award and Alumni
 Universities which started after 1911 do not have a fair
chance.
 Disciplines not related to the awarding fields do not have
a fair chance. Other important awards include Abel,
Pulitzer, Turing, Tyler, Pritzker, etc.
 Institutions for winning awards and those for doing the
researches may not be the same.
 Institutions for obtaining degrees and those for pursuing
the studies may not be the same.
 Postdoctoral training is not considered.
25
Methodological: Per Capita Performance
 The weight of the PCP indicator for per capita
performance is rather low. Large institutions have
relatively high positions in the ranking.
 However, it’s very difficult to obtain internationally
comparable data on the number of academic staff.
 The types of academic staff: such as purely teaching staff,
teaching and research staff, purely research staff.
 The ranks of academic staff: such as professor, associate
professor, reader, lecturer, research scientist etc.
26
Technical: Attributions
 Many universities have more than one commonly used
names: such as Virginia Tech and Virginia Polytechnic
and State University.
 Variations due to translation: such as Univ Koln and
Univ Cologne, Univ Vienna and Univ Wien.
 Abbreviated names: such as ETH Zurich for Swiss
Federal Institute of Technology Zurich.
 Some authors only write their departmental or institute
names without mentioning their university names.
27
Technical: Definition of Institution
 University systems: such as Univ California system,
Univ London system.
 Affiliated institutions and research organizations:
such as Ecole Polytechnique Montreal (affiliated to
University of Montreal), CNRS Labs (affiliated to
French universities).
 Teaching and affiliated Hospitals: complex!
 Our answer: according to author’s expression.
28
Other Technical Problems
Merging, splitting, inheriting, discontinuing, name-
changing of institutions such as:
 Univ Kwazulu-Natal in South Africa merged from Univ
Natal and Univ Durban-Westville.
 University of Innsbruck in Austria splitted into Univ
Innsbruck and Innsbruck Medical Univ.
 Humboldt Univ Berlin and Free Univ Berlin inheriting
the Nobel Prizes of the Berlin University before world
war II.
29
Ranking byRanking by
Broad Subject FieldsBroad Subject Fields
(ARWU-FIELD)(ARWU-FIELD)
30
Requests for Ranking of World Universities by
 Broad subject fields or schools, colleges
and
 Subject fields or programs, departments
★ In addition, many top Chinese universities want to
learn their positions in the world by broad subject
fields or disciplines.
31
Definition of Broad Subject Fields
 Natural Sciences and Mathematics (SCI)
 Engineering/Technology and Computer Sciences (ENG)
 Life and Agriculture Sciences (LIFE)
 Clinical Medicine and Pharmacy (MED)
 Social Sciences (SOC)
 Arts and humanities are not ranked
32
ARWU-FIELD Indicators and Weights
Code SCI ENG LIFE MED SOC
Alumni 10% 10% 10% 10%
Award 15% 15% 15% 15%
HiCi 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%
TOP 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%
PUB 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%
Fund 25%
33
Changes in Indicators and Definition
 N&S in ARWU is not used in ARWU-FIELD.
 TOP is the percentage of articles published in the top
20% journals of each broad subject field.
 Fund is the total engineering-related research
expenditures. It’s used only for ENG ranking.
 Alumni and Award since 1951 are used for all rankings
fields except ENG.
 PUB is the total number of articles indexed by Thomson
in the past year.
34
Results of ARWU-FIELD
 http://ed.sjtu.edu.cn/ranking.htm
 Top 100 universities in SCI
 Top 100 universities in ENG
 Top 100 universities in LIFE
 Top 100 universities in MED
 Top 100 universities in SOC
 Statistics of top universities by region & country
 List of top universities by number of top fields
35
Special Problems in ARWU-FIELD
 It’s difficult to obtain data on engineering-related
research expenditures and make them comparable.
For 2007, Fund was obtained only for US and
Canadian universities.
 It’s difficult to separate the Nobel Laureates in
Physiology or Medicine. They are used in both LIFE
and MED ranking.
36
Final RemarksFinal Remarks
37
Controversy of Ranking
 Any ranking is controversial and no ranking is
absolutely objective.
 University rankings become popular in many
countries. Whether we agree or not, ranking systems
clearly are here to stay.
 The key issue then becomes how to improve ranking
systems for the benefits of higher education (IREG).
38
Use of Ranking
 Rankings should be used with cautions. Their
methodologies must be read carefully before
reporting or using their results.
 Rankings should be used in combination with other
types of evaluation whenever possible, such as
bench-marking, peer review, etc.
39
Future Efforts
 Study all the above mentioned problems and
continuously improve the ranking methodologies.
 Establish more comprehensive databases of
WCU.
 Update ARWU (every August) and ARWU-
FIELD annually (every February).
40
Future Efforts (Cont’ed)
 Provide ranking of universities specialized or
strong in engineering, medicine, etc. based on the
classification of world universities.
 Provide ranking of universities with different
size, history, budget and function etc. once
internationally comparable data are obtained.
41
http://gse.sjtu.edu.cn/
http://www.arwu.org

More Related Content

What's hot

Overcoming Curriculum Challenges: Linking Global Internships to Academic Cour...
Overcoming Curriculum Challenges: Linking Global Internships to Academic Cour...Overcoming Curriculum Challenges: Linking Global Internships to Academic Cour...
Overcoming Curriculum Challenges: Linking Global Internships to Academic Cour...CIEE
 
International rankings of universities; An overview for managers M&C TU Delft
International rankings of universities; An overview for managers M&C TU DelftInternational rankings of universities; An overview for managers M&C TU Delft
International rankings of universities; An overview for managers M&C TU DelftKim Huijpen
 
Competition over research funds and junior researchers in Japanese universiti...
Competition over research funds and junior researchers in Japanese universiti...Competition over research funds and junior researchers in Japanese universiti...
Competition over research funds and junior researchers in Japanese universiti...Masatsura IGAMI
 
THE Russia supplement March 2015
THE Russia supplement March 2015THE Russia supplement March 2015
THE Russia supplement March 2015Fiona Salvage
 
3rd International Conference on Learning, Education and Pedagogy (LEAP)
3rd International Conference on Learning, Education and Pedagogy (LEAP)3rd International Conference on Learning, Education and Pedagogy (LEAP)
3rd International Conference on Learning, Education and Pedagogy (LEAP)Global R & D Services
 
Is Western Europe Even Relevant Anymore?”
Is Western Europe Even Relevant Anymore?”Is Western Europe Even Relevant Anymore?”
Is Western Europe Even Relevant Anymore?”CIEE
 
Changing Student Employer Attitudes
Changing Student Employer Attitudes Changing Student Employer Attitudes
Changing Student Employer Attitudes Ray Wallace
 
7th International Conference on Learning, Education and Pedagogy (LEAP)
7th International Conference on Learning, Education and Pedagogy (LEAP)7th International Conference on Learning, Education and Pedagogy (LEAP)
7th International Conference on Learning, Education and Pedagogy (LEAP)Global R & D Services
 
LMIC Contact 2019 Conference
LMIC Contact 2019 ConferenceLMIC Contact 2019 Conference
LMIC Contact 2019 ConferenceSteven Tobin
 
Scientific Impact of Institutions, Academic Journals and Researchers in the R...
Scientific Impact of Institutions, Academic Journals and Researchers in the R...Scientific Impact of Institutions, Academic Journals and Researchers in the R...
Scientific Impact of Institutions, Academic Journals and Researchers in the R...Mirko Spiroski
 
William Allan Kritsonis, PhD & Norman Butler
William Allan Kritsonis, PhD & Norman ButlerWilliam Allan Kritsonis, PhD & Norman Butler
William Allan Kritsonis, PhD & Norman ButlerWilliam Kritsonis
 

What's hot (18)

Graduate Engineering Programs at USC (Spring 2016)
Graduate Engineering Programs at USC (Spring 2016)Graduate Engineering Programs at USC (Spring 2016)
Graduate Engineering Programs at USC (Spring 2016)
 
Overcoming Curriculum Challenges: Linking Global Internships to Academic Cour...
Overcoming Curriculum Challenges: Linking Global Internships to Academic Cour...Overcoming Curriculum Challenges: Linking Global Internships to Academic Cour...
Overcoming Curriculum Challenges: Linking Global Internships to Academic Cour...
 
International rankings of universities; An overview for managers M&C TU Delft
International rankings of universities; An overview for managers M&C TU DelftInternational rankings of universities; An overview for managers M&C TU Delft
International rankings of universities; An overview for managers M&C TU Delft
 
Competition over research funds and junior researchers in Japanese universiti...
Competition over research funds and junior researchers in Japanese universiti...Competition over research funds and junior researchers in Japanese universiti...
Competition over research funds and junior researchers in Japanese universiti...
 
2010412 ocw-angela 11h20
2010412 ocw-angela 11h202010412 ocw-angela 11h20
2010412 ocw-angela 11h20
 
M9 chinese students in u.s. schools - college board
M9   chinese students in u.s. schools - college board M9   chinese students in u.s. schools - college board
M9 chinese students in u.s. schools - college board
 
THE Russia supplement March 2015
THE Russia supplement March 2015THE Russia supplement March 2015
THE Russia supplement March 2015
 
Domorad
DomoradDomorad
Domorad
 
3rd International Conference on Learning, Education and Pedagogy (LEAP)
3rd International Conference on Learning, Education and Pedagogy (LEAP)3rd International Conference on Learning, Education and Pedagogy (LEAP)
3rd International Conference on Learning, Education and Pedagogy (LEAP)
 
Is Western Europe Even Relevant Anymore?”
Is Western Europe Even Relevant Anymore?”Is Western Europe Even Relevant Anymore?”
Is Western Europe Even Relevant Anymore?”
 
Changing Student Employer Attitudes
Changing Student Employer Attitudes Changing Student Employer Attitudes
Changing Student Employer Attitudes
 
A Simple Guide to Higher Education
A Simple Guide to Higher EducationA Simple Guide to Higher Education
A Simple Guide to Higher Education
 
7th International Conference on Learning, Education and Pedagogy (LEAP)
7th International Conference on Learning, Education and Pedagogy (LEAP)7th International Conference on Learning, Education and Pedagogy (LEAP)
7th International Conference on Learning, Education and Pedagogy (LEAP)
 
2011_directors_report
2011_directors_report2011_directors_report
2011_directors_report
 
Nacme workshop
Nacme workshopNacme workshop
Nacme workshop
 
LMIC Contact 2019 Conference
LMIC Contact 2019 ConferenceLMIC Contact 2019 Conference
LMIC Contact 2019 Conference
 
Scientific Impact of Institutions, Academic Journals and Researchers in the R...
Scientific Impact of Institutions, Academic Journals and Researchers in the R...Scientific Impact of Institutions, Academic Journals and Researchers in the R...
Scientific Impact of Institutions, Academic Journals and Researchers in the R...
 
William Allan Kritsonis, PhD & Norman Butler
William Allan Kritsonis, PhD & Norman ButlerWilliam Allan Kritsonis, PhD & Norman Butler
William Allan Kritsonis, PhD & Norman Butler
 

Similar to Links prezi

Universties global ranking systems for pub.
Universties global ranking systems for pub.Universties global ranking systems for pub.
Universties global ranking systems for pub.Ahmed Metwaly
 
Paper 1: Shanghai Ranking (Liu, Nian Cai)
Paper 1: Shanghai Ranking (Liu, Nian Cai)Paper 1: Shanghai Ranking (Liu, Nian Cai)
Paper 1: Shanghai Ranking (Liu, Nian Cai)Kent Business School
 
University rankings; an overview for the municipality of Delft July 2013
University rankings; an overview for the municipality of Delft July 2013University rankings; an overview for the municipality of Delft July 2013
University rankings; an overview for the municipality of Delft July 2013Kim Huijpen
 
Doctoral Dissertation - Pablo Migliorini - July 2015
Doctoral Dissertation - Pablo Migliorini - July 2015Doctoral Dissertation - Pablo Migliorini - July 2015
Doctoral Dissertation - Pablo Migliorini - July 2015Pablo Migliorini
 
Higher education is not only teaching, it is both teaching and research (PAGE...
Higher education is not only teaching, it is both teaching and research (PAGE...Higher education is not only teaching, it is both teaching and research (PAGE...
Higher education is not only teaching, it is both teaching and research (PAGE...Carlo Magno
 
Harassing with Numbers: the Uses and Abuses of Bureaucracy and Bibliometry
Harassing with Numbers: the Uses and Abuses of Bureaucracy and BibliometryHarassing with Numbers: the Uses and Abuses of Bureaucracy and Bibliometry
Harassing with Numbers: the Uses and Abuses of Bureaucracy and BibliometryGiuseppe De Nicolao
 
The Chinese National Top Level Courses Project - using Open Educational Resou...
The Chinese National Top Level Courses Project - using Open Educational Resou...The Chinese National Top Level Courses Project - using Open Educational Resou...
The Chinese National Top Level Courses Project - using Open Educational Resou...Stian Håklev
 
“Classification and ranking in Europe” by Mr Hans Hoving
“Classification and ranking in Europe” by Mr Hans Hoving“Classification and ranking in Europe” by Mr Hans Hoving
“Classification and ranking in Europe” by Mr Hans HovingSATN
 
Paper 7: Ranking Methodology of Times Higher Education (Baty)
Paper 7: Ranking Methodology of Times Higher Education (Baty)Paper 7: Ranking Methodology of Times Higher Education (Baty)
Paper 7: Ranking Methodology of Times Higher Education (Baty)Kent Business School
 
University Rankings, the Triple Helix Model and Webometrics: Opening Pandora’...
University Rankings,the Triple Helix Modeland Webometrics:Opening Pandora’...University Rankings,the Triple Helix Modeland Webometrics:Opening Pandora’...
University Rankings, the Triple Helix Model and Webometrics: Opening Pandora’...Han Woo PARK
 
Warsaw Seminar Melita Kovacevic
Warsaw Seminar Melita KovacevicWarsaw Seminar Melita Kovacevic
Warsaw Seminar Melita KovacevicYouth Agora
 
Increasing university publication and citation rate
Increasing university publication and citation rateIncreasing university publication and citation rate
Increasing university publication and citation rateNader Ale Ebrahim
 
A scientometric perspective on university ranking
A scientometric perspective on university rankingA scientometric perspective on university ranking
A scientometric perspective on university rankingLudo Waltman
 
The Impact of World University Rankings on Research and Curriculum Developmen...
The Impact of World University Rankings on Research and Curriculum Developmen...The Impact of World University Rankings on Research and Curriculum Developmen...
The Impact of World University Rankings on Research and Curriculum Developmen...Leslie Chan
 
Japans University Ranking System.pptx
Japans University Ranking System.pptxJapans University Ranking System.pptx
Japans University Ranking System.pptxLenaZwatz
 
International ranking system
International ranking system International ranking system
International ranking system Kirsten Siksne
 

Similar to Links prezi (20)

ARWU 2010
ARWU 2010ARWU 2010
ARWU 2010
 
Utr. prog. frid. ying cheng
Utr. prog. frid. ying chengUtr. prog. frid. ying cheng
Utr. prog. frid. ying cheng
 
Universties global ranking systems for pub.
Universties global ranking systems for pub.Universties global ranking systems for pub.
Universties global ranking systems for pub.
 
Paper 1: Shanghai Ranking (Liu, Nian Cai)
Paper 1: Shanghai Ranking (Liu, Nian Cai)Paper 1: Shanghai Ranking (Liu, Nian Cai)
Paper 1: Shanghai Ranking (Liu, Nian Cai)
 
University rankings; an overview for the municipality of Delft July 2013
University rankings; an overview for the municipality of Delft July 2013University rankings; an overview for the municipality of Delft July 2013
University rankings; an overview for the municipality of Delft July 2013
 
Doctoral Dissertation - Pablo Migliorini - July 2015
Doctoral Dissertation - Pablo Migliorini - July 2015Doctoral Dissertation - Pablo Migliorini - July 2015
Doctoral Dissertation - Pablo Migliorini - July 2015
 
Higher education is not only teaching, it is both teaching and research (PAGE...
Higher education is not only teaching, it is both teaching and research (PAGE...Higher education is not only teaching, it is both teaching and research (PAGE...
Higher education is not only teaching, it is both teaching and research (PAGE...
 
Harassing with Numbers: the Uses and Abuses of Bureaucracy and Bibliometry
Harassing with Numbers: the Uses and Abuses of Bureaucracy and BibliometryHarassing with Numbers: the Uses and Abuses of Bureaucracy and Bibliometry
Harassing with Numbers: the Uses and Abuses of Bureaucracy and Bibliometry
 
The Chinese National Top Level Courses Project - using Open Educational Resou...
The Chinese National Top Level Courses Project - using Open Educational Resou...The Chinese National Top Level Courses Project - using Open Educational Resou...
The Chinese National Top Level Courses Project - using Open Educational Resou...
 
“Classification and ranking in Europe” by Mr Hans Hoving
“Classification and ranking in Europe” by Mr Hans Hoving“Classification and ranking in Europe” by Mr Hans Hoving
“Classification and ranking in Europe” by Mr Hans Hoving
 
Paper 7: Ranking Methodology of Times Higher Education (Baty)
Paper 7: Ranking Methodology of Times Higher Education (Baty)Paper 7: Ranking Methodology of Times Higher Education (Baty)
Paper 7: Ranking Methodology of Times Higher Education (Baty)
 
University Rankings, the Triple Helix Model and Webometrics: Opening Pandora’...
University Rankings,the Triple Helix Modeland Webometrics:Opening Pandora’...University Rankings,the Triple Helix Modeland Webometrics:Opening Pandora’...
University Rankings, the Triple Helix Model and Webometrics: Opening Pandora’...
 
Warsaw Seminar Melita Kovacevic
Warsaw Seminar Melita KovacevicWarsaw Seminar Melita Kovacevic
Warsaw Seminar Melita Kovacevic
 
Increasing university publication and citation rate
Increasing university publication and citation rateIncreasing university publication and citation rate
Increasing university publication and citation rate
 
Ranking online university provision globally
Ranking online university provision globallyRanking online university provision globally
Ranking online university provision globally
 
A scientometric perspective on university ranking
A scientometric perspective on university rankingA scientometric perspective on university ranking
A scientometric perspective on university ranking
 
The Impact of World University Rankings on Research and Curriculum Developmen...
The Impact of World University Rankings on Research and Curriculum Developmen...The Impact of World University Rankings on Research and Curriculum Developmen...
The Impact of World University Rankings on Research and Curriculum Developmen...
 
Japans University Ranking System.pptx
Japans University Ranking System.pptxJapans University Ranking System.pptx
Japans University Ranking System.pptx
 
International ranking system
International ranking system International ranking system
International ranking system
 
Comparing Education Internationally
Comparing Education InternationallyComparing Education Internationally
Comparing Education Internationally
 

Links prezi

  • 1. 1 Academic Ranking of World Universities Methodologies and Problems August, 2008August, 2008 By Professor Nian Cai LIUBy Professor Nian Cai LIU Center for World-Class Universities, Graduate School of EducationCenter for World-Class Universities, Graduate School of Education Shanghai Jiao Tong University, ChinaShanghai Jiao Tong University, China
  • 2. 2 Outline Purposes1 Methodologies & Results2 Problems & Discussion33 Ranking by Subject Fields44 35 Final Remarks5
  • 4. 4 Dream of Chinese for WCU  World-class university (WCU) is a dream for generations of Chinese. It’s not only for pride, but also for the future of China.  Recently, Chinese government has launched several initiatives for research universities. The best-known one is specially designed to build WCU (985 Project).
  • 5. 5 Goals of Top Chinese Universities  Many top Chinese universities have setup their strategic goals as WCU.  Most of them have also set time tables for achieving the goal of WCU. For example: 2016 for Peking University 2020 for Tsinghua University
  • 6. 6 Questions About WCU  Is there a clear definition for WCU?  How many WCU should there be in the world?  What are the positions of top Chinese universities in the world?  How can Chinese universities improve themselves to reach the goal of WCU?
  • 7. 7 Academic Ranking of World Universities  Our original purpose of doing the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) was to find out the position of Chinese universities in the world and the gap between them and WCU.  ARWU was put on the internet upon the encouragement of colleagues from all over the world.
  • 8. 8 Features of ARWU  ARWU uses a few carefully selected, objective criteria and internationally comparable data that everyone could verify in some way.  It has been carried out by a ranking team of four researchers at Shanghai Jiao Tong University for their academic interests.  It has been done independently without any financial support from any external sources.
  • 10. 10 Selection of Universities  Any university that has any Nobel Laureates, Fields Medals, Highly Cited Researchers, or papers published in Nature or Science.  Major universities of every country with significant amount of papers indexed by Thomson.  Number of universities scanned: >2000  Number of universities actually ranked: >1000  Number of ranked universities on our web: 500
  • 12. 12 Definition of Indicator: Alumni  The total number of the alumni of an institution winning Nobel Prizes and Fields Medals.  Alumni are defined as those who obtain bachelor, Master’s or doctoral degrees from the institution.  Different weights are set according to the periods of obtaining degrees. The weight is 100% for alumni of 1991-2000, 90% for alumni of 1981-1990, 80% for alumni of 1971-1980, and so on.  If a person obtains more than one degrees from an institution, the institution is considered once only.
  • 13. 13 Definition of Indicator: Award  The total number of the staff of an institution winning Nobel prizes in physics, chemistry, medicine and economics and Fields Medal in Mathematics.  Staff is defined as those who work at an institution at the time of winning the prize.  Different weights are set according to the periods of winning the prizes. The weight is 100% for winners since 2001, 90% for winners in 1991-2000, 80% for winners in 1981-1990, 70% for winners in 1971-1980, and so on.  If a winner is affiliated with more than one institution, each institution is assigned the reciprocal of the number of institutions.  For Nobel prizes, if a prize is shared by more than one person, weights are set for winners according to their proportion of prize.
  • 14. 14 Definition of Indicator: HiCi  The number of highly cited researchers in 21 broad subject categories in life sciences, medicine, physical sciences, engineering and social sciences.  The definition of categories and detailed procedures can be found at the website of Institute of Scientific Information.  The total number of HiCi is about 5000, about 4000 of which is university staff.
  • 15. 15 Definition of Indicator: N&S  The annual average number of articles published in Nature and Science in the past five years.  To distinguish the order of author affiliation, a weight of 100% is assigned for corresponding author, 50% for first author (second author if the first author is the same as corresponding author), 25% for the next author, and 10% for other authors.  Only publications of article type are considered.
  • 16. 16 Definition of Indicator: PUB  Total number of articles indexed in Science Citation Index-expanded (SCIE) and Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) in the past year.  A weight of 2 is assigned to articles indexed in SSCI to compensate the bias against humanities and social sciences.  Only publications of article type are considered.
  • 17. 17 Definition of Indicator: PCP  The sub-total scores of the above five indicators divided by the number of full-time equivalent academic staff.  If the number of academic staff for institutions of a country cannot be obtained, the total scores of the above five indicators is used.  For ranking 2005, the number of full-time equivalent academic staff is obtained for institutions in USA, China, Australia, Italy, Netherlands, Sweden, and Belgium etc.
  • 18. 18 Main Sources of Data  Nobel laureates: http://www.nobel.se  Fields Medals: http://www.mathunion.org/medals/  Highly-cited researchers: http://www.isihighlycited.com  Articles published in Nature and Science: http://www.isiknowledge.com  Articles indexed in SCIE and SSCI: http://www.isiknowledge.com
  • 19. 19 Results of ARWU  http://www.arwu.org/  Top 500 universities in the world  Top 100 universities in North and Latin America  Top 100 universities in Asia/Oceania  Top 100 universities in Europe  Statistics of top universities by region and country  Percentage distribution of top universities by country as compared with the share of global population and GDP
  • 21. 21 Methodological: Education and Service  Education is the basic function of any university, however, it would be impossible to rank the quality of education due to the huge differences among the national systems.  Contribution to the national economic development is becoming increasingly important for universities, however, it is impossible to obtain internationally comparable indicators and data.  The academic or research performance of universities, a good indication of their reputation, can be ranked internationally.
  • 22. 22 Methodological: Humanities & Social Sciences  Many well-known institutions specialized in humanities and social sciences are ranked relatively low.  Since 2004, the indicator of N&S is not considered for institutions specialized in humanities and social sciences, its weight is relocated to other indicators.  Since 2005, a weight of 2 for articles indexed by SSCI is considered.  Nevertheless, if a university specialized in social sciences and humanities had Nobel Laureates in economics and Highly Cited Researchers in social sciences, it should have good standing.
  • 23. 23 Methodological: Language Bias  English is the language of international academic community.  Any ranking based on academic performance will be biased towards institutions in English-speaking countries.  One possible solution: papers published in non-native languages are offered a special weight.  Another possible solution: normalization of total articles by the proportion of journal editors of each country.
  • 24. 24 Methodological: Award and Alumni  Universities which started after 1911 do not have a fair chance.  Disciplines not related to the awarding fields do not have a fair chance. Other important awards include Abel, Pulitzer, Turing, Tyler, Pritzker, etc.  Institutions for winning awards and those for doing the researches may not be the same.  Institutions for obtaining degrees and those for pursuing the studies may not be the same.  Postdoctoral training is not considered.
  • 25. 25 Methodological: Per Capita Performance  The weight of the PCP indicator for per capita performance is rather low. Large institutions have relatively high positions in the ranking.  However, it’s very difficult to obtain internationally comparable data on the number of academic staff.  The types of academic staff: such as purely teaching staff, teaching and research staff, purely research staff.  The ranks of academic staff: such as professor, associate professor, reader, lecturer, research scientist etc.
  • 26. 26 Technical: Attributions  Many universities have more than one commonly used names: such as Virginia Tech and Virginia Polytechnic and State University.  Variations due to translation: such as Univ Koln and Univ Cologne, Univ Vienna and Univ Wien.  Abbreviated names: such as ETH Zurich for Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich.  Some authors only write their departmental or institute names without mentioning their university names.
  • 27. 27 Technical: Definition of Institution  University systems: such as Univ California system, Univ London system.  Affiliated institutions and research organizations: such as Ecole Polytechnique Montreal (affiliated to University of Montreal), CNRS Labs (affiliated to French universities).  Teaching and affiliated Hospitals: complex!  Our answer: according to author’s expression.
  • 28. 28 Other Technical Problems Merging, splitting, inheriting, discontinuing, name- changing of institutions such as:  Univ Kwazulu-Natal in South Africa merged from Univ Natal and Univ Durban-Westville.  University of Innsbruck in Austria splitted into Univ Innsbruck and Innsbruck Medical Univ.  Humboldt Univ Berlin and Free Univ Berlin inheriting the Nobel Prizes of the Berlin University before world war II.
  • 29. 29 Ranking byRanking by Broad Subject FieldsBroad Subject Fields (ARWU-FIELD)(ARWU-FIELD)
  • 30. 30 Requests for Ranking of World Universities by  Broad subject fields or schools, colleges and  Subject fields or programs, departments ★ In addition, many top Chinese universities want to learn their positions in the world by broad subject fields or disciplines.
  • 31. 31 Definition of Broad Subject Fields  Natural Sciences and Mathematics (SCI)  Engineering/Technology and Computer Sciences (ENG)  Life and Agriculture Sciences (LIFE)  Clinical Medicine and Pharmacy (MED)  Social Sciences (SOC)  Arts and humanities are not ranked
  • 32. 32 ARWU-FIELD Indicators and Weights Code SCI ENG LIFE MED SOC Alumni 10% 10% 10% 10% Award 15% 15% 15% 15% HiCi 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% TOP 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% PUB 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% Fund 25%
  • 33. 33 Changes in Indicators and Definition  N&S in ARWU is not used in ARWU-FIELD.  TOP is the percentage of articles published in the top 20% journals of each broad subject field.  Fund is the total engineering-related research expenditures. It’s used only for ENG ranking.  Alumni and Award since 1951 are used for all rankings fields except ENG.  PUB is the total number of articles indexed by Thomson in the past year.
  • 34. 34 Results of ARWU-FIELD  http://ed.sjtu.edu.cn/ranking.htm  Top 100 universities in SCI  Top 100 universities in ENG  Top 100 universities in LIFE  Top 100 universities in MED  Top 100 universities in SOC  Statistics of top universities by region & country  List of top universities by number of top fields
  • 35. 35 Special Problems in ARWU-FIELD  It’s difficult to obtain data on engineering-related research expenditures and make them comparable. For 2007, Fund was obtained only for US and Canadian universities.  It’s difficult to separate the Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine. They are used in both LIFE and MED ranking.
  • 37. 37 Controversy of Ranking  Any ranking is controversial and no ranking is absolutely objective.  University rankings become popular in many countries. Whether we agree or not, ranking systems clearly are here to stay.  The key issue then becomes how to improve ranking systems for the benefits of higher education (IREG).
  • 38. 38 Use of Ranking  Rankings should be used with cautions. Their methodologies must be read carefully before reporting or using their results.  Rankings should be used in combination with other types of evaluation whenever possible, such as bench-marking, peer review, etc.
  • 39. 39 Future Efforts  Study all the above mentioned problems and continuously improve the ranking methodologies.  Establish more comprehensive databases of WCU.  Update ARWU (every August) and ARWU- FIELD annually (every February).
  • 40. 40 Future Efforts (Cont’ed)  Provide ranking of universities specialized or strong in engineering, medicine, etc. based on the classification of world universities.  Provide ranking of universities with different size, history, budget and function etc. once internationally comparable data are obtained.