Law Case study
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
1 like•2,345 views
Nickerson advertised an auction of brewing materials, plant, and office furniture. On the day office furniture was to be auctioned, he withdrew all furniture lots. Harris, who attended to buy furniture, sued for expenses. The court unanimously found the advertisement was an invitation to treat, not an offer, so Nickerson was not liable. Auctions are invitations to bid, not offers, so goods can be withdrawn without liability.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Carlil v carbolic smoke ball co
A landmark case which proves that an advertisement can sometimes amounting to an offer and not necessarily be treated as an invitation to treat.
Offer & acceptance offer
An offer is made when one party indicates a willingness to be bound if the other party accepts. An offer is different from an invitation to treat, which merely invites further negotiations. Displays of goods and advertisements are usually invitations to treat rather than offers, allowing either party to back out. However, an advertisement can be an offer if the wording and context show a clear intent to be bound if accepted. An offer can generally be withdrawn at any time before acceptance.
Business Law - Sales of Goods Act Case Studies
The document discusses four legal cases related to sale of goods and consumer disputes:
1) Ravinder Raj vs Maruti Udyog involved a dispute over payment of increased excise duty on a car. The Supreme Court dismissed the petitioner's claim based on sections of the Sale of Goods Act.
2) JCL International vs Bharat Petroleum concerned fixing the price of LPG cylinders. The court ruled the provisional price could be revised based on the contract and Sale of Goods Act.
3) Ammireddy Oils vs Oriental Insurance involved an insurance claim for goods damaged in a fire. The court awarded partial payment based on the policy terms.
4) C.N.
moot file of sec 304 -b,201and 34 of indian penal code
The document is an appeal filed on behalf of the prosecution in the Supreme Court of India regarding the case of Union of India vs. Ajay Gupta & Ors. It summarizes the key facts of the case, which involve the dowry death of a woman named Aarti shortly after her marriage. It outlines the judgments from the trial court and high court, and presents two issues for the Supreme Court's consideration: 1) whether Ajay Gupta and his wife can be held liable for dowry death and cruelty, and 2) whether two other individuals can be held liable for murder. It proceeds to provide arguments supporting the prosecution's position on both issues.
Contract Cases - offer, acceptance, legal capacity
those who are taking foundation in law in uitm, this masterpiece contains most of the cases for LAW087.
Balfour v/s Balfour
Mr. Balfour promised to pay his wife £30 per month while they were separated due to her health issues. When he stopped payments, she sued to enforce the promise. The lower court ruled in her favor, finding the promise enforceable. However, the appellate court determined that for a promise between spouses to be legally binding, both parties must intend it to be enforceable. Since there was no evidence Mr. Balfour intended a legally binding agreement, the appellate court found the promise was not enforceable.
Contract Case law: Offer
This document summarizes several contract case law rulings related to offers:
1) R v Clarke and Taylor v Laird established that for an offer to be accepted, the offeree must have knowledge of the offer and intend to accept it at the time of the alleged acceptance.
2) Partridge v Crittenden, P.S.G.B. v Boots Chemists, Fisher v Bell, and Harvey v Facey ruled that shop displays and advertisements are invitations to treat, not offers, which can be revoked before acceptance.
3) Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co established that advertisements can constitute unilateral offers in exceptional cases.
Wagering agreements
What is a wager; agreements by way of wager void; some special cases; difference between wagering agreements and insurance contracts.
Recommended
Carlil v carbolic smoke ball co
A landmark case which proves that an advertisement can sometimes amounting to an offer and not necessarily be treated as an invitation to treat.
Offer & acceptance offer
An offer is made when one party indicates a willingness to be bound if the other party accepts. An offer is different from an invitation to treat, which merely invites further negotiations. Displays of goods and advertisements are usually invitations to treat rather than offers, allowing either party to back out. However, an advertisement can be an offer if the wording and context show a clear intent to be bound if accepted. An offer can generally be withdrawn at any time before acceptance.
Business Law - Sales of Goods Act Case Studies
The document discusses four legal cases related to sale of goods and consumer disputes:
1) Ravinder Raj vs Maruti Udyog involved a dispute over payment of increased excise duty on a car. The Supreme Court dismissed the petitioner's claim based on sections of the Sale of Goods Act.
2) JCL International vs Bharat Petroleum concerned fixing the price of LPG cylinders. The court ruled the provisional price could be revised based on the contract and Sale of Goods Act.
3) Ammireddy Oils vs Oriental Insurance involved an insurance claim for goods damaged in a fire. The court awarded partial payment based on the policy terms.
4) C.N.
moot file of sec 304 -b,201and 34 of indian penal code
The document is an appeal filed on behalf of the prosecution in the Supreme Court of India regarding the case of Union of India vs. Ajay Gupta & Ors. It summarizes the key facts of the case, which involve the dowry death of a woman named Aarti shortly after her marriage. It outlines the judgments from the trial court and high court, and presents two issues for the Supreme Court's consideration: 1) whether Ajay Gupta and his wife can be held liable for dowry death and cruelty, and 2) whether two other individuals can be held liable for murder. It proceeds to provide arguments supporting the prosecution's position on both issues.
Contract Cases - offer, acceptance, legal capacity
those who are taking foundation in law in uitm, this masterpiece contains most of the cases for LAW087.
Balfour v/s Balfour
Mr. Balfour promised to pay his wife £30 per month while they were separated due to her health issues. When he stopped payments, she sued to enforce the promise. The lower court ruled in her favor, finding the promise enforceable. However, the appellate court determined that for a promise between spouses to be legally binding, both parties must intend it to be enforceable. Since there was no evidence Mr. Balfour intended a legally binding agreement, the appellate court found the promise was not enforceable.
Contract Case law: Offer
This document summarizes several contract case law rulings related to offers:
1) R v Clarke and Taylor v Laird established that for an offer to be accepted, the offeree must have knowledge of the offer and intend to accept it at the time of the alleged acceptance.
2) Partridge v Crittenden, P.S.G.B. v Boots Chemists, Fisher v Bell, and Harvey v Facey ruled that shop displays and advertisements are invitations to treat, not offers, which can be revoked before acceptance.
3) Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co established that advertisements can constitute unilateral offers in exceptional cases.
Wagering agreements
What is a wager; agreements by way of wager void; some special cases; difference between wagering agreements and insurance contracts.
Case laws in indian contract act 1872
This document summarizes key concepts from Indian contract law:
1) It discusses offer and acceptance through examples like offers to buy a car or house. It also examines the Carlil v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. case where a company was held liable for failing to pay a reward.
2) It analyzes requirements for a valid contract including free consent, lawful consideration, and capacity of parties. It also covers restraint of trade, impossible acts, and contracts with minors.
3) It discusses performance of contracts including actual performance, tender of performance, and circumstances where performance is not required like novation or rescission. It also summarizes who can perform a contract.
The terms lien of shares
This document provides an overview of lien of shares under company law based on case law and judicial decisions. It defines lien and explains that a company's right of lien must be provided in its articles of association. Key points covered include: the effect of exercising lien; circumstances where lien cannot be enforced; and the nature of a lien in terms of not being affected by limitation, being transferable, applying to joint shareholdings, and being capable of being waived or discharged. The document also discusses when a notice threatening sale would be invalid and circumstances where an illegal sale may still protect an innocent purchaser.
Offer and acceptance/Law of Contract/Business Law
This document discusses the legal principles of offer and acceptance in contract law. It defines an offer as a proposal made with the intention of obtaining consent. The key points covered are:
1) An offer must be definite, unambiguous, and communicated to the offeree. It cannot be vague or a mere invitation.
2) For a valid acceptance, the acceptance must be absolute and unconditional, conforming to all terms of the offer. A conditional or qualified acceptance is considered a counter-offer.
3) The acceptance must be communicated to the offeror in a reasonable manner, such as in writing or orally, for a contract to be formed. Silence does not imply acceptance.
Privity of Contract
Privity of contract refers to the principle that a contract can only grant rights and impose obligations on the contracting parties.
Under this principle, a person who is not a party to a contract has no right to sue on that contract or enforce any of its terms. However, there are some exceptions where third parties may gain rights, such as if a contract establishes a trust intended to benefit third parties, or if collateral contracts between one party and a third party exist within the subject matter of the main contract.
While privity of contract is the general rule, third parties can also sometimes pursue claims in tort law, such as with negligence actions. An action may also be based on a collateral contract between one party and a
Moot Memorial
This document is a memorial submitted on behalf of the respondent in a civil suit filed under Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It contains the index of authorities cited, a list of abbreviations, statements of jurisdiction and facts of the case, issues raised, summary of arguments, and detailed arguments on each issue. The key issues are whether the offer and acceptance were valid as per the Indian Contract Act, 1872, whether the revocation of offer by the defendant was valid, and whether there was a breach of contract. The respondent argues that while the offer was valid, the acceptance was not as the defendant was unaware of it, and the revocation of offer was valid as per the provisions of the Act. Therefore, no valid
Consideration
The document discusses the key elements of consideration according to Indian contract law:
1) Consideration must move at the desire of the promisor. It must be done at their request.
2) Consideration can move from either the promisee or any other person, including a stranger to the contract.
3) Consideration can be past (before the promise), present (at the time of promise), or future (after the promise).
Law of Contract Cases
The document discusses offer and acceptance in contract law. It provides definitions for key terms like offeror and offeree. It examines landmark cases that established important principles. Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co established that advertisements can constitute offers capable of acceptance. Bowerman v ABTA established that notices displayed by travel agents constituted offers. The document also discusses what does and does not constitute an offer, like negotiations being invitations to treat, and how long an offer remains open.
Offer
An offer is an expression of willingness to contract made with the intention of becoming binding once accepted. An offer can be made in writing, verbally, expressly, or impliedly. It can be made to a specific individual or group. However, certain pre-contractual communications like advertisements, price displays, and tenders are considered invitations to treat rather than offers. An offer ends upon acceptance, rejection, counteroffer, lapse of time, failure of condition, death of the offeror or offeree, or revocation communicated to the offeree.
Partners and Outsiders in a Partnership
Contents are listed in the 1st page
P/S : Hi, I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
Agreement in Contract: Mirror Image Rule
Learning Objectives:
Students will be analysing the importance of Mirror Image Rule in detecting starting point of an agreement
Memorial respondent
dont ever try todownload it, if u r trying to download it, thn risk lies totally on u. we dont have any ulterior motive.
Subrogation othman bin hashim v kkw auto centre [2012] hc
This summary provides the high level details of the document in 3 sentences:
The document discusses a case regarding subrogation where an insurer filed a claim in the plaintiff's name after the plaintiff's vehicle was involved in an accident while in the defendant's possession. The court determined that the insurer was not entitled to subrogation as the driver at the time of the accident was covered by the plaintiff's insurance policy. The court also found that the plaintiff did not prove the defendant was negligent and dismissed the plaintiff's claim, while allowing the defendant's counterclaim for outstanding repair costs.
(5) section 8
Section 8 of the Evidence Act 1950 provides that evidence of motive, preparation, and previous or subsequent conduct is relevant in legal proceedings. Motive refers to the reason for doing something, while intention refers to consciously shaping conduct to cause a certain event. Evidence of motive is admissible but absence of motive does not prove innocence. Motive cannot be proven through hearsay evidence. Evidence of other crimes can also be relevant to show motive. The document discusses these principles and provides examples of how Malaysian courts have interpreted and applied Section 8 in past cases.
memorial of ipc sec 302 and 326 B
1. The prosecution is appealing the conviction of the accused Sunil in the High Court of Delhi.
2. Sunil was convicted by the sessions court of murder under section 302 IPC and acid attack under section 326B read with section 34 IPC for throwing acid on the victim Reema, which led to her death.
3. The prosecution is arguing that Sunil must be convicted on both charges. For the murder charge, the prosecution argues that Sunil threw acid on Reema with the help of his friend Ramesh, causing grievous injuries that led to her death, satisfying the conditions for murder. For the acid attack charge, the prosecution argues that Sunil threw the acid with help from R
Remedies Of Breach of contract(law)
This document summarizes various remedies available for breach of contract, including rescission, damages, quantum meruit, specific performance, and injunction. It defines each remedy and provides examples to illustrate when each would apply. Rescission cancels the contract, allowing the non-breaching party to be discharged from obligations. Damages compensate for losses from the breach. Quantum meruit pays for work completed if a contract is terminated before completion. Specific performance requires actual fulfillment of contractual obligations. An injunction restrains a breaching party from prohibited actions.
Importance of carlill v carbolic smoke ball
1) Mrs. Carlill saw an advertisement from Carbolic Smoke Ball Company offering £100 to anyone who got sick with influenza after using its product as directed.
2) Mrs. Carlill purchased and used the product until she contracted influenza, then claimed the £100 as offered. The company refused to pay.
3) The Court of Appeal ruled that the advertisement constituted a binding unilateral contract, with Mrs. Carlill's purchase and use of the product representing acceptance of the offer and consideration for the promise of £100. This established that advertisements can represent offers capable of being accepted.
Tresspass to land and goods.pptx
Trespass to land involves direct interference with possession of land without lawful justification. Throwing stones onto a neighbor's property is an example. Trespass to goods involves unreasonable interference with goods in someone's possession. Remedies for trespass include re-entry, suits for damages, and actions for mense profits. Detinue involves wrongfully detaining someone's goods after demand for return. Conversion involves dealing with goods in a way that is inconsistent with the owner's rights, such as mixing another's wine with water.
Sale of goods Act, 1930
The document discusses the key aspects of a contract of sale under Indian law. It begins by defining a contract of sale and differentiating between a sale and an agreement to sell. It then covers the essential elements of a valid contract of sale, implied conditions and warranties, caveat emptor, and how the transfer of property occurs. Specifically, it examines how property is transferred for unascertained goods, specific goods, and goods sold on approval. The document provides a comprehensive overview of contract of sale with examples to illustrate important legal concepts.
Moot memorial
This document provides arguments regarding a dispute over the formation and alleged breach of a contract for the sale of a vintage car between Mr. Raghav and Mr. Sam. It summarizes the 3 key issues in dispute and provides supporting arguments for each issue in 3 or less sentences.
Issue 1: Whether the offer and acceptance were valid. It argues that the offer and acceptance communicated via telex met the requirements to form a valid contract under the Indian Contract Act.
Issue 2: Whether the revocation of the offer was valid. It argues that the revocation was not valid as it did not comply with provisions for revocation under the Indian Contract Act.
Issue 3: Whether there was a breach of contract.
MOHORI BIBEE VS DRAHMOS GHOSH
A minor had taken out a loan of 20,000 rupees at 12% interest from Dharmodas Ghose and secured it with a mortgage. The minor's mother later claimed the mortgage was void due to the minor's lack of capacity to enter into a contract. The court held that the contract made by the minor was void as minors do not have the capacity to enter contracts under Indian law. As the minor was not bound by the contractual promises made, they could not be compelled to repay the loan amount. The defense of estoppel also did not apply to validate the contract as the law's purpose is to protect minors.
Introduction to Offer: Advertisement, Auction and Tender
Learning Outcome: After completion of this lesson students will -
a) learn about the general principle relating to offer in case of advertisements of products and auctions placed in newspapers
b) learn about exceptions to the prima facie rules of offer.
Lecture 2 cases on formation of a contract
The document discusses numerous cases related to the formation of contracts, specifically focusing on offer, acceptance, and termination of offers. Regarding offers, cases establish that displaying goods does not constitute an offer, advertisements are generally invitations to treat rather than offers, and bids can be withdrawn before acceptance. Regarding acceptance, cases show that counteroffers reject original offers, silence does not imply acceptance, and conduct can indicate acceptance. Regarding termination, cases demonstrate that offers can be revoked before acceptance.
More Related Content
What's hot
Case laws in indian contract act 1872
This document summarizes key concepts from Indian contract law:
1) It discusses offer and acceptance through examples like offers to buy a car or house. It also examines the Carlil v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. case where a company was held liable for failing to pay a reward.
2) It analyzes requirements for a valid contract including free consent, lawful consideration, and capacity of parties. It also covers restraint of trade, impossible acts, and contracts with minors.
3) It discusses performance of contracts including actual performance, tender of performance, and circumstances where performance is not required like novation or rescission. It also summarizes who can perform a contract.
The terms lien of shares
This document provides an overview of lien of shares under company law based on case law and judicial decisions. It defines lien and explains that a company's right of lien must be provided in its articles of association. Key points covered include: the effect of exercising lien; circumstances where lien cannot be enforced; and the nature of a lien in terms of not being affected by limitation, being transferable, applying to joint shareholdings, and being capable of being waived or discharged. The document also discusses when a notice threatening sale would be invalid and circumstances where an illegal sale may still protect an innocent purchaser.
Offer and acceptance/Law of Contract/Business Law
This document discusses the legal principles of offer and acceptance in contract law. It defines an offer as a proposal made with the intention of obtaining consent. The key points covered are:
1) An offer must be definite, unambiguous, and communicated to the offeree. It cannot be vague or a mere invitation.
2) For a valid acceptance, the acceptance must be absolute and unconditional, conforming to all terms of the offer. A conditional or qualified acceptance is considered a counter-offer.
3) The acceptance must be communicated to the offeror in a reasonable manner, such as in writing or orally, for a contract to be formed. Silence does not imply acceptance.
Privity of Contract
Privity of contract refers to the principle that a contract can only grant rights and impose obligations on the contracting parties.
Under this principle, a person who is not a party to a contract has no right to sue on that contract or enforce any of its terms. However, there are some exceptions where third parties may gain rights, such as if a contract establishes a trust intended to benefit third parties, or if collateral contracts between one party and a third party exist within the subject matter of the main contract.
While privity of contract is the general rule, third parties can also sometimes pursue claims in tort law, such as with negligence actions. An action may also be based on a collateral contract between one party and a
Moot Memorial
This document is a memorial submitted on behalf of the respondent in a civil suit filed under Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It contains the index of authorities cited, a list of abbreviations, statements of jurisdiction and facts of the case, issues raised, summary of arguments, and detailed arguments on each issue. The key issues are whether the offer and acceptance were valid as per the Indian Contract Act, 1872, whether the revocation of offer by the defendant was valid, and whether there was a breach of contract. The respondent argues that while the offer was valid, the acceptance was not as the defendant was unaware of it, and the revocation of offer was valid as per the provisions of the Act. Therefore, no valid
Consideration
The document discusses the key elements of consideration according to Indian contract law:
1) Consideration must move at the desire of the promisor. It must be done at their request.
2) Consideration can move from either the promisee or any other person, including a stranger to the contract.
3) Consideration can be past (before the promise), present (at the time of promise), or future (after the promise).
Law of Contract Cases
The document discusses offer and acceptance in contract law. It provides definitions for key terms like offeror and offeree. It examines landmark cases that established important principles. Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co established that advertisements can constitute offers capable of acceptance. Bowerman v ABTA established that notices displayed by travel agents constituted offers. The document also discusses what does and does not constitute an offer, like negotiations being invitations to treat, and how long an offer remains open.
Offer
An offer is an expression of willingness to contract made with the intention of becoming binding once accepted. An offer can be made in writing, verbally, expressly, or impliedly. It can be made to a specific individual or group. However, certain pre-contractual communications like advertisements, price displays, and tenders are considered invitations to treat rather than offers. An offer ends upon acceptance, rejection, counteroffer, lapse of time, failure of condition, death of the offeror or offeree, or revocation communicated to the offeree.
Partners and Outsiders in a Partnership
Contents are listed in the 1st page
P/S : Hi, I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
Agreement in Contract: Mirror Image Rule
Learning Objectives:
Students will be analysing the importance of Mirror Image Rule in detecting starting point of an agreement
Memorial respondent
dont ever try todownload it, if u r trying to download it, thn risk lies totally on u. we dont have any ulterior motive.
Subrogation othman bin hashim v kkw auto centre [2012] hc
This summary provides the high level details of the document in 3 sentences:
The document discusses a case regarding subrogation where an insurer filed a claim in the plaintiff's name after the plaintiff's vehicle was involved in an accident while in the defendant's possession. The court determined that the insurer was not entitled to subrogation as the driver at the time of the accident was covered by the plaintiff's insurance policy. The court also found that the plaintiff did not prove the defendant was negligent and dismissed the plaintiff's claim, while allowing the defendant's counterclaim for outstanding repair costs.
(5) section 8
Section 8 of the Evidence Act 1950 provides that evidence of motive, preparation, and previous or subsequent conduct is relevant in legal proceedings. Motive refers to the reason for doing something, while intention refers to consciously shaping conduct to cause a certain event. Evidence of motive is admissible but absence of motive does not prove innocence. Motive cannot be proven through hearsay evidence. Evidence of other crimes can also be relevant to show motive. The document discusses these principles and provides examples of how Malaysian courts have interpreted and applied Section 8 in past cases.
memorial of ipc sec 302 and 326 B
1. The prosecution is appealing the conviction of the accused Sunil in the High Court of Delhi.
2. Sunil was convicted by the sessions court of murder under section 302 IPC and acid attack under section 326B read with section 34 IPC for throwing acid on the victim Reema, which led to her death.
3. The prosecution is arguing that Sunil must be convicted on both charges. For the murder charge, the prosecution argues that Sunil threw acid on Reema with the help of his friend Ramesh, causing grievous injuries that led to her death, satisfying the conditions for murder. For the acid attack charge, the prosecution argues that Sunil threw the acid with help from R
Remedies Of Breach of contract(law)
This document summarizes various remedies available for breach of contract, including rescission, damages, quantum meruit, specific performance, and injunction. It defines each remedy and provides examples to illustrate when each would apply. Rescission cancels the contract, allowing the non-breaching party to be discharged from obligations. Damages compensate for losses from the breach. Quantum meruit pays for work completed if a contract is terminated before completion. Specific performance requires actual fulfillment of contractual obligations. An injunction restrains a breaching party from prohibited actions.
Importance of carlill v carbolic smoke ball
1) Mrs. Carlill saw an advertisement from Carbolic Smoke Ball Company offering £100 to anyone who got sick with influenza after using its product as directed.
2) Mrs. Carlill purchased and used the product until she contracted influenza, then claimed the £100 as offered. The company refused to pay.
3) The Court of Appeal ruled that the advertisement constituted a binding unilateral contract, with Mrs. Carlill's purchase and use of the product representing acceptance of the offer and consideration for the promise of £100. This established that advertisements can represent offers capable of being accepted.
Tresspass to land and goods.pptx
Trespass to land involves direct interference with possession of land without lawful justification. Throwing stones onto a neighbor's property is an example. Trespass to goods involves unreasonable interference with goods in someone's possession. Remedies for trespass include re-entry, suits for damages, and actions for mense profits. Detinue involves wrongfully detaining someone's goods after demand for return. Conversion involves dealing with goods in a way that is inconsistent with the owner's rights, such as mixing another's wine with water.
Sale of goods Act, 1930
The document discusses the key aspects of a contract of sale under Indian law. It begins by defining a contract of sale and differentiating between a sale and an agreement to sell. It then covers the essential elements of a valid contract of sale, implied conditions and warranties, caveat emptor, and how the transfer of property occurs. Specifically, it examines how property is transferred for unascertained goods, specific goods, and goods sold on approval. The document provides a comprehensive overview of contract of sale with examples to illustrate important legal concepts.
Moot memorial
This document provides arguments regarding a dispute over the formation and alleged breach of a contract for the sale of a vintage car between Mr. Raghav and Mr. Sam. It summarizes the 3 key issues in dispute and provides supporting arguments for each issue in 3 or less sentences.
Issue 1: Whether the offer and acceptance were valid. It argues that the offer and acceptance communicated via telex met the requirements to form a valid contract under the Indian Contract Act.
Issue 2: Whether the revocation of the offer was valid. It argues that the revocation was not valid as it did not comply with provisions for revocation under the Indian Contract Act.
Issue 3: Whether there was a breach of contract.
MOHORI BIBEE VS DRAHMOS GHOSH
A minor had taken out a loan of 20,000 rupees at 12% interest from Dharmodas Ghose and secured it with a mortgage. The minor's mother later claimed the mortgage was void due to the minor's lack of capacity to enter into a contract. The court held that the contract made by the minor was void as minors do not have the capacity to enter contracts under Indian law. As the minor was not bound by the contractual promises made, they could not be compelled to repay the loan amount. The defense of estoppel also did not apply to validate the contract as the law's purpose is to protect minors.
What's hot (20)
Subrogation othman bin hashim v kkw auto centre [2012] hc
Subrogation othman bin hashim v kkw auto centre [2012] hc
Similar to Law Case study
Introduction to Offer: Advertisement, Auction and Tender
Learning Outcome: After completion of this lesson students will -
a) learn about the general principle relating to offer in case of advertisements of products and auctions placed in newspapers
b) learn about exceptions to the prima facie rules of offer.
Lecture 2 cases on formation of a contract
The document discusses numerous cases related to the formation of contracts, specifically focusing on offer, acceptance, and termination of offers. Regarding offers, cases establish that displaying goods does not constitute an offer, advertisements are generally invitations to treat rather than offers, and bids can be withdrawn before acceptance. Regarding acceptance, cases show that counteroffers reject original offers, silence does not imply acceptance, and conduct can indicate acceptance. Regarding termination, cases demonstrate that offers can be revoked before acceptance.
AIS 2102 Offer in Contract Law
After completion of this lesson students will be able to:
a) define offer
b) distinguish between offer and invitation to treat
c) explain how a proposal is revoked
cpc presentation case law of cpc main impo
This case concerns an appeal to set aside a property sale conducted by a court-appointed commissioner. The key facts are:
1) The appellant purchased the disputed property at a court auction for Rs. 12 lakhs.
2) One respondent filed an application to set aside the sale, claiming another party was willing to pay Rs. 18 lakhs. However, this alleged purchaser failed to appear in court on three occasions.
3) The High Court set aside the sale, finding inadequate notice and publicity of the sale.
4) The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and reinstated the sale. It found no requirement to publish newspaper notices and adequate publicity was given. Further, no
sas
The document discusses the legal distinction between an invitation to treat and a binding offer in contract law. It provides the case of Spencer v Harding, where the court established that an invitation for tenders to purchase stock was not an offer capable of acceptance, but rather an invitation to treat. Generally, displays of goods, advertisements of prices, and invitations for tenders or bids are considered invitations to treat rather than offers. An invitation to treat is not a binding promise and the inviter can change their mind, unlike a true offer.
Contracts cases
The document summarizes several key contract law cases:
1. Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company established that serious promises made in advertisements, like offering a reward, can form binding unilateral contracts if the promisor intends for people to rely on the promise.
2. Dickinson v. Dodds held that an offer lapses if the offeree is informed the property is no longer for sale before acceptance, as the offeror has no obligation to keep the offer open.
3. Marshall v. Canadian Permanent Trust said a contract can be rescinded if one party was incapable of understanding the transaction and it was an improvident deal that did not reflect fair market value.
Acceptance case
The document discusses 9 cases related to contract law principles of offer and acceptance:
1) Heathcote Ball v Barry established that the highest bid at an auction without reserve creates a binding contract.
2) Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking determined that terms posted after payment at a parking machine were not incorporated into the contract.
3) Entorres v Miles Far East ruled that acceptance of an offer is effective when received, not when sent.
4) Three additional cases addressed issues like battle of forms negotiations, option agreements, and certainty of terms.
5) Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company established that advertisements can form binding unilateral contracts when conditions are met.
6
contract cases of invitation to treat
- Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company established that advertisements can constitute contractual offers if they invite acceptance by performance of an act. The company's advertisement offering a reward if its product did not cure influenza was held to be an enforceable unilateral contract that the plaintiff accepted by using the product as directed.
- Harris v Nickerson established that auction sales are generally considered invitations to treat rather than offers. Displaying goods with prices at an auction does not complete a contract until the auctioneer accepts a bid by dropping the hammer.
- Fisher v Bell held that displaying a restricted weapon with a price tag in a shop window was an invitation to treat rather than an offer for sale, so the defendant was not guilty of
General Principles of Offer and Invitation to Treat
Learning Objectives:
Students will -
a) learn the basics about 'offer'
b) be able to differentiate between offer and invitation to treat
c) be acquainted with precedents which led to established rules of law regarding the status of offer and invitation to treat under Common Law
Lecture 11 misrepresentation - cases
1. This document discusses various cases related to misrepresentation in contracts. It examines different types of misrepresentation including false statements of fact, statements that induce a contract, and different categories of misrepresentation such as negligent or fraudulent misrepresentation.
2. The document also explores the remedies available for misrepresentation, such as rescission of the contract, claims for damages or indemnity. Key cases establish that a misrepresentation must be of a material fact rather than just opinion, and that it must have actually induced the claimant to enter into the contract.
3. The document provides an overview of English law on misrepresentation through analyzing numerous past cases that set precedents on important issues like what constitutes a misrepresentation,
The laws Case
The document summarizes several important cases related to contract law in the UK and India. It discusses key principles such as:
1) The intention to create legal relations and whether agreements between family members constitute a legally binding contract.
2) What constitutes an offer versus invitation to treat and whether displaying goods amounts to an offer.
3) The need for acceptance of an offer to be unconditional and without deviation from the original terms, or it will be considered a counteroffer.
4) Circumstances where performance or conduct can imply acceptance of an offer, such as with rewards, rather than requiring direct communication of acceptance.
GROUP_5.pptx
The document discusses advertisements, auctions, and relevant case law. It explains that advertisements are generally invitations to treat rather than offers, since they do not commit the seller to a sale. Auctions without reserve price are an exception, where the auctioneer makes an offer to sell to the highest bidder. Key cases discussed include Partridge v Crittenden, which established advertisements as invitations to treat, and Warlow v Harrison, where an auction without reserve was deemed an offer. The document also notes exceptions in Pakistani law, such as auction agreements requiring approval from development authorities.
BUSINESS LAW UNIT 2-LAW OF CONTRACT.pptx
The document discusses the essential elements required to form a legally binding contract according to business law. It outlines the key elements of offer, acceptance, consideration, intention to create legal relations, certainty and capacity. It defines what constitutes a valid offer and discusses how an offer can be communicated, terminated through lapse of time, rejection or revocation. It also differentiates an offer from an invitation to treat, providing examples of invitations to treat like displaying goods for sale and advertisements.
Lecture 10 mistake - cases
The document summarizes several common law cases dealing with mistakes in the formation of contracts:
1) Common mistake cases involve situations where there was a fundamental assumption or fact that was mistaken by both parties at the time of contract formation.
2) Unilateral mistake cases involve situations where one party was mistaken about a basic assumption when entering the contract, while the other party was not.
3) Mutual mistake cases involve situations where both parties were mistaken about the same fundamental assumption or fact when forming the contract.
The document provides brief summaries of several cases that exemplify each type of mistake.
Carlill vs carbolic smoke ball co. project
The document summarizes a law student's case project on the landmark 1892 contract law case Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company. It discusses how the case established that advertisements promising rewards for certain actions can constitute binding unilateral contracts. The summary discusses how Mrs. Carlill contracted influenza after using the Carbolic Smoke Ball as instructed, despite the company's advertisement promising £100 to anyone who did. The Court of Appeal unanimously ruled that the advertisement formed a valid contract between Mrs. Carlill and the company and ordered the £100 to be paid.
Contract_law_ppt.ppt
This document provides an overview of contract law, specifically focusing on the essential elements of a binding contract, including offer, acceptance, consideration, and intention to be legally bound. It defines an offer as a clear statement of terms that the offeror is willing to do business under, and discusses types of offers like bilateral and unilateral offers. It also examines what constitutes a valid acceptance, including requirements that it mirrors the offer, is firm, and is communicated to the offeror. The termination of offers through refusal, counteroffers, lapse of time, and revocation is also summarized.
Introduction to contract law - offer by Maxwell ranasinghe
This document provides an introduction and overview of key concepts related to the formation of a valid contract under UK law. It defines a contract and outlines the essential elements for a valid contract, including offer and acceptance, intention to create legal relations, capacity to contract, consideration, and adherence to legal formalities. It then examines in more detail the requirements for a valid offer, including that an offer must be definite, communicated to the offeree, and distinguishable from invitations to treat or tenders. The document also discusses how an offer can be revoked or rejected and the requirements for a valid acceptance.
Offer & acceptance acceptance
- An offer must be accepted for a contract to be formed. Acceptance is usually communicated to the offeror. Silence is generally not considered acceptance unless the offer specifies that silence will constitute acceptance. A counteroffer rejects the original offer and a new offer is made instead of accepting the original. Acceptance can be through words or conduct demonstrating assent to the offer's terms.
Similar to Law Case study (19)
Introduction to Offer: Advertisement, Auction and Tender
Introduction to Offer: Advertisement, Auction and Tender
General Principles of Offer and Invitation to Treat
General Principles of Offer and Invitation to Treat
Introduction to contract law - offer by Maxwell ranasinghe
Introduction to contract law - offer by Maxwell ranasinghe
Recently uploaded
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
Integrating Advocacy and Legal Tactics to Tackle Online Consumer Complaints
Our company bridges the gap between registered users and experienced advocates, offering a user-friendly online platform for seamless interaction. This platform empowers users to voice their grievances, particularly regarding online consumer issues. We streamline support by utilizing our team of expert advocates to provide consultancy services and initiate appropriate legal actions.
Our Online Consumer Legal Forum offers comprehensive guidance to individuals and businesses facing consumer complaints. With a dedicated team, round-the-clock support, and efficient complaint management, we are the preferred solution for addressing consumer grievances.
Our intuitive online interface allows individuals to register complaints, seek legal advice, and pursue justice conveniently. Users can submit complaints via mobile devices and send legal notices to companies directly through our portal.
快速办理(SCU毕业证书)澳洲南十字星大学毕业证文凭证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(SCU毕业证书)澳洲南十字星大学毕业证文凭证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Corporate Governance : Scope and Legal Framework
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
MEANING
Corporate Governance refers to the way in which companies are governed and to what purpose. It identifies who has power and accountability, and who makes decisions. It is, in essence, a toolkit that enables management and the board to deal more effectively with the challenges of running a company.
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
slide deck : Patenting innovations in 3D printing
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptx
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Pim Betist's presentation about generative AI in the legal sector at Lexpo.com '24
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
Search Warrants for NH Law Enforcement Officers
Training aid for law enforcement officers related to search warrants, the requirements needed, drafting, and execution of the search warrant.
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
在线办理(UNE毕业证书)新英格兰大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(UNE毕业证书)新英格兰大学毕业证成绩单》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Business Laws Sunita saha
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
Lincoln硕士毕业证成绩单【微信95270640】办理新西兰林肯大学毕业证原版一模一样、Lincoln毕业证制作【Q微信95270640】《新西兰林肯大学毕业证购买流程》《Lincoln成绩单制作》新西兰林肯大学毕业证书Lincoln毕业证文凭新西兰林肯大学
本科毕业证书,学历学位认证如何办理【留学国外学位学历认证、毕业证、成绩单、大学Offer、雅思托福代考、语言证书、学生卡、高仿教育部认证等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务】代办国外（海外）英国、加拿大、美国、新西兰、澳大利亚、新西兰等国外各大学毕业证、文凭学历证书、成绩单、学历学位认证真实可查。
[留学文凭学历认证(留信认证使馆认证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单毕业证证书大学Offer请假条成绩单语言证书国际回国人员证明高仿教育部认证申请学校等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务。
多年留学服务公司,拥有海外样板无数能完美1:1还原海外各国大学degreeDiplomaTranscripts等毕业材料。海外大学毕业材料都有哪些工艺呢？工艺难度主要由：烫金.钢印.底纹.水印.防伪光标.热敏防伪等等组成。而且我们每天都在更新海外文凭的样板以求所有同学都能享受到完美的品质服务。
国外毕业证学位证成绩单办理方法：
1客户提供办理新西兰林肯大学新西兰林肯大学毕业证学位证信息：姓名生日专业学位毕业时间等（如信息不确定可以咨询顾问：我们有专业老师帮你查询）；
2开始安排制作毕业证成绩单电子图；
3毕业证成绩单电子版做好以后发送给您确认；
4毕业证成绩单电子版您确认信息无误之后安排制作成品；
5成品做好拍照或者视频给您确认；
6快递给客户（国内顺丰国外DHLUPS等快读邮寄）
— — — — 我们是挂科和未毕业同学们的福音我们是实体公司精益求精的工艺！ — — — -
一真实留信认证的作用(私企外企荣誉的见证):
1：该专业认证可证明留学生真实留学身份同时对留学生所学专业等级给予评定。
2：国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书这个入网证书并且可以归档到地方。
3：凡是获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内将在公安部网内查询个人身份证信息后同步读取人才网入库信息。
4：个人职称评审加20分个人信誉贷款加10分。
5：在国家人才网主办的全国网络招聘大会中纳入资料供国家500强等高端企业选择人才。问山娃想买什么想吃什么山娃知道父亲赚钱很辛苦除了书籍和文具山娃啥也不要能牵着父亲的手满城闲逛他已心满意足了父亲连挑了三套童装叫山娃试穿山娃有点不想父亲说城里不比乡下要穿得漂漂亮亮爸怎么不穿得漂亮望着父亲山娃反问道父亲听了并不回答只是吃吃地笑山娃很精神越逛越起劲父亲却越逛越疲倦望着父亲呵欠连天的样子山娃也说困了累了回家吧小屋闷罐一般头顶上的三叶扇彻夜呜呜作响搅得满屋热气腾腾也搅得山娃心烦意乱父亲一的
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
Presentation by Justin Ordoyo
University of the Philippines College of Law
It's the Law: Recent Court and Administrative Decisions of Interest
2024 Idaho Water Users Association, Sun Valley, Idaho - June 11, 2024. Presented by Payton Hampton and Garrett Kitamura
Recently uploaded (20)
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
Integrating Advocacy and Legal Tactics to Tackle Online Consumer Complaints
Integrating Advocacy and Legal Tactics to Tackle Online Consumer Complaints
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
It's the Law: Recent Court and Administrative Decisions of Interest
It's the Law: Recent Court and Administrative Decisions of Interest
Law Case study
- 1. CASE STUDY ON HARRIS V. NICKERSON(1873) Made by:- Shubham Bhatnagar Enrolment no.-05917003918 MBA Div.A (1st Shift)
- 2. HIGHLIGHTS OF THE CASE Court: High Court, Queen's Bench Division Place: Bury St. Edmunds, United Kingdom Decided: 25th April, 1873 Judges Sitting: Blackburn, Quain and Archibald, JJ Defendant: Nickerson Plaintiff: Harris Concepts Involved: Contract, offer, auction, withdrawal of goods
- 3. Facts about the Case Nickerson i.e. the defendant, an auctioneer, advertised in the London papers that certain brewing materials, plant, and office furniture would be sold by him at Bury St. Edmunds on 14th August,1872 and two following days. Harris i.e. the plaintiff, a commission broker in London, having a commission to buy the office furniture, went down to the sale. On the third day, on which the furniture was advertised for sale, all the lots of furniture were withdrawn. Upon which the plaintiff brought an action against the defendant to recover for his loss of time and expenses.
- 4. Issues Involved? Whether Advertisement constituted Offer or Invitation to treat? Whether at auction sale, withdrawn of goods made defendant liable to plaintiff in eye of court?
- 5. What their lawyers said? • Macrae Moir, for the defendant, contended that it was clear that the mere advertising of a sale did not amount to a contract with anybody who attended the sale that any particular lot, or class of articles advertised, would be put up for sale. • Warton, for the plaintiff, contended that the advertisement of the sale by the defendant was a contract by him with the plaintiff, who attended the sale on the faith of it, that he would sell the property advertised according to the conditions; and the withdrawal of the property after the plaintiff had incurred expenses in consequence of the advertisement was a breach of such contract. A reasonable notice of the withdrawal, at all events, ought to have been given.
- 6. The Judgement… • Blackburn, J. founded his judgment that "any one who advertises a sale by publishing an advertisement [would become] responsible to everybody who attends the sale for his cab hire or travelling expenses“. • Quain and Archibald, JJ. also drew public policy arguments, emphasising that there existed no authority on which to base a decision that the Defendant be liable to indemnify all those who attended his auction. • The court held unanimously that the advertisement did not constitute an offer, but rather was a mere declaration of intent to sell the goods. • Therefore, Harris lost the case.
- 7. Conclusion • The case established that an advertisement that goods will be put up for auction does not constitute an offer to any person that the goods will actually be put up, and that the advertiser is therefore free to withdraw the goods from the auction at any time prior to the auction. • So, we can say Auction is not an offer, but it is an invitation to offer.
- 8. Suggestions In the advertisement, Nickerson mentioned that brewing materials, plant, and office furniture would be sold. So, he should not have withdraw the sales of office furniture, even though he is not liable to pay anything to anyone. 1 As it is a case of Invitation to treat, so Harris should not have appealed for loss of time and expenses incurred. 2