· K’Watch Glucose· K’Watch Athlete· About Us· Press· Blo

· K’Watch Glucose
· K’Watch Athlete
· About Us
· Press
· Blog
· Support
· Jobs
· Contact us
· Newsletter
·
K'Watch Glucose
Discreet and Painless
Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Right on your Wrist
WATCH THE VIDEO
Your glucose level in no time
K’Watch Glucose is a CGM (Continuous Glucose Monitor)
device that will track your glucose level continuously
throughout the day and night. Check your sugar levels
discreetly by simply glancing at the watch. The glucose trend
and history graphs will help you to improve your glucose level
control.
Bloodfree
Get your glucose level without painful blood test. No more
lancets, no more strips, no more wounded fingers. Check it
anytime anywhere.
As simple as a watch
Checking your glucose has never been so simple. No applicator,
no extra reader. Just a watch.
Show it without exposing yourself

K'Watch is a cool and sleek technology. When others will
simply see a watch, you will find your day-to-day diabetes
companion.
Alerts for peace of mind
Your watch will help you monitor your sugars even when you
are busy with life. It will alert you to highs or lows with
discreet vibrations. You will be able to program different alert
levels for night time and even send alerts to your family or
friends*.
Simple usage, complex technology
Underneath the watch, you will find the disposable K’apsul,
using SkinTaste® technology. K’apsul will consist of an array
of micro-points and biosensors that will measure glucose
painlessly through the skin. K’apsul will be held in place with a
hypoallergenic adhesive patch. The patch will be easily
removed and replaced after 7 days of use.
Stay fit, get connected
Need a coach? K'Watch will track your steps taken, calories
burned and heart rate. It will track your progress and help you
hit your goals.
You will get more insights through the iOS and Android apps
available at product launch. You will be able to explore your
history to identify patterns and better understand your diabetes,
in order to share your results with family or doctors. K’Watch
may also be used as an extension of your smartphone.
* Requires dedicated mobile app PKvitality
Let’s keep in touch
Be notified of the progress of K'Watch by subscribing to the
newsletter*.
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
* Your e-mail and IP address shall be collected to send you our
newsletter and targeted information about the activities of

PKvitality.
This product shall be a medical device but is still under
development process and may still shift in the course of
carrying out the project. It is not available yet. All information
within emails you may receive from PKvitality or this website
are provided for information purpose only. All informations,
data, photos, videos contained in emails you may receive from
PKvitality or this website are non contractual and proprietary
information.
Know more
Our products
K’Watch Glucose
K’Watch Athlete
Discover PKvitality
About Us
Press
Blog
Contact Us
Support
Jobs
Contact Us
Legal Notice and privacy policy
Follow us !
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you
navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are
categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are

essential for the working of basic functionalities of the ...
NecessaryAlways Enabled
Performance Cookies
SAVE & ACCEPT
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NRNP_6645_Week7_Assignment_Rubric
Grid ViewList View
Excellent
90%–100%
Good
80%–89%
Fair
70%–79%
Poor
0%–69%
Develop a 2- to 3-page paper comparing humanistic-existential
therapy to another psychotherapeutic approach of your choice.
Be sure to address the following:
· Briefly describe humanistic-existential psychotherapy and the

second approach you selected.
Points:
Points Range:
23 (23%) - 25 (25%)
The response includes an accurate and concise description of
humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected
approach.
Feedback:

Points:
Points Range:
20 (20%) - 22 (22%)
The response includes a description of humanistic-existential
psychotherapy and your selected approach.
Feedback:

Points:
Points Range:
18 (18%) - 19 (19%)
The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate
description of humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your
selected approach.
Feedback:

Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) - 17 (17%)
The response includes a vague and inaccurate description of
approach, or is missing.
Feedback:

· Explain at least three differences between humanistic-
existential psychotherapy and the approach you selected.
· Include how these differences might impact your practice as
a PMHNP.
Points:
Points Range:
23 (23%) - 25 (25%)
The response includes an accurate and clear explanation of
three differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy
and your selected approach.
The response includes a thoughtful and throrough explanation of
how the differences between humanistic-existential

psychotherapy and your selected approach might impact your
practice as a PMHNP.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
20 (20%) - 22 (22%)
The response includes an accurate explanation of three

differences between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and
your selected approach.
The response includes an explanation of how the differences
between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected
approach might impact your practice as a PMHNP.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
18 (18%) - 19 (19%)

The response includes a somehwat vague or inaccurate
explanation of three differences between humanistic-existential
explanation of how the differences between humanistic-
existential psychotherapy and your selected approach might
impact your practice as a PMHNP.
Feedback:
Points:

Points Range:
0 (0%) - 17 (17%)
The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of
and your selected approach, or is missing.
practice as a PMHNP, or is missing.
Feedback:
· Explain why humanistic-existential psychotherapy was
utilized with the client in the video and why it was the

treatment of choice.
· Describe the expected potential outcome if the second
approach had been used with the client.
· Support your response with at least three peer-reviewed,
evidence-based sources from the literature. PDFs are attached.
Points:
Points Range:
32 (32%) - 35 (35%)
The response includes a thorough and accurate explanation of
why humanistic-existential psychotherapy was utilized with the
client and why it was the treatment of choice.
The response includes a thorough and accurate description of
the expected potential outcome had the second approach been

used with the client.
The response is supported by at least three peer-reviewed,
evidence-based sources from the literature that provide strong
support for the rationale provided. PDFs are attached.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
28 (28%) - 31 (31%)

The response includes an accurate explanation of why
humanistic-existential psychotherapy was utilized with the
The response includes a description of the expected potential
outcome had the second approach been used with the client.
The response is supported by three peer-reviewed, evidence-
based sources from the literature that provide appropriate
Feedback:
Points:

Points Range:
24 (24%) - 27 (27%)
The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete
explanation of why humanistic-existential psychotherapy was
utilized with the client and why it was the treatment of choice.
description of the expected potential outcome had the second
approach been used with the client.
The response is supported by two or three peer-reviewed,
evidence-based sources from the literature. Resources selected
may provide only weak support for the rationale provided. PDFs
may not be attached.
Feedback:

Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) - 23 (23%)
client and why it was the treatment of choice, or is missing.
The response includes a vauge and incomplete description of the
expected potential outcome had the second approach been used
with the client, or is missing.

The response is supported by vague or inaccurate evidence from
the literature, or is missing.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development
and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas,
flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences
are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and
lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose
statement and introduction is provided which delineates all
required criteria.
Points:

Points Range:
5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and
conclusion are provided that delineates all required criteria.
Feedback:
Points:

Points Range:
4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are
stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.
Feedback:

Points:
Points Range:
3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
vague or off topic.
Feedback:

Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were
provided.
Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting - English writing
standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
Points:
Points Range:
5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no
errors.
Feedback:

Points:
Points Range:
4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains 3 or 4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct
APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins,
indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and
reference list.
Points:
Points Range:
5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.

Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Contains 1 or 2 APA format errors.

Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
Feedback:

Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Feedback:

Show Descriptions
Show Feedback
Develop a 2- to 3-page paper comparing humanistic-existential
therapy to another psychotherapeutic approach of your choice.
Be sure to address the following:
second approach you selected.--
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent
90%–100%
23 (23%) - 25 (25%)
The response includes an accurate and concise description of

approach.
Good
80%–89%
20 (20%) - 22 (22%)
The response includes a description of humanistic-existential
Fair
70%–79%
18 (18%) - 19 (19%)
description of humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your
selected approach.
Poor
0%–69%
0 (0%) - 17 (17%)

The response includes a vague and inaccurate description of
approach, or is missing.
Feedback:
· Explain at least three differences between humanistic-
existential psychotherapy and the approach you selected.
· Include how these differences might impact your practice as
a PMHNP.--
Excellent
90%–100%
23 (23%) - 25 (25%)

The response includes an accurate and clear explanation of three
The response includes a thoughtful and throrough explanation of
practice as a PMHNP.
Good
80%–89%
20 (20%) - 22 (22%)
The response includes an accurate explanation of three
The response includes an explanation of how the differences
between humanistic-existential psychotherapy and your selected
approach might impact your practice as a PMHNP.
Fair
70%–79%
18 (18%) - 19 (19%)

The response includes a somehwat vague or inaccurate
explanation of three differences between humanistic-existential
explanation of how the differences between humanistic-
existential psychotherapy and your selected approach might
impact your practice as a PMHNP.
Poor
0%–69%
0 (0%) - 17 (17%)
and your selected approach, or is missing.
practice as a PMHNP, or is missing.

Feedback:
· Explain why humanistic-existential psychotherapy was
utilized with the client in the video and why it was the
treatment of choice.
· Describe the expected potential outcome if the second
approach had been used with the client.
· Support your response with at least three peer-reviewed,
evidence-based sources from the literature. PDFs are attached.--
Excellent
90%–100%
32 (32%) - 35 (35%)
The response includes a thorough and accurate explanation of

The response includes a thorough and accurate description of
the expected potential outcome had the second approach been
used with the client.
The response is supported by at least three peer-reviewed,
evidence-based sources from the literature that provide strong
Good
80%–89%
28 (28%) - 31 (31%)
The response includes an accurate explanation of why
humanistic-existential psychotherapy was utilized with the
The response includes a description of the expected potential
outcome had the second approach been used with the client.
The response is supported by three peer-reviewed, evidence-
based sources from the literature that provide appropriate
Fair

70%–79%
24 (24%) - 27 (27%)
explanation of why humanistic-existential psychotherapy was
utilized with the client and why it was the treatment of choice.
description of the expected potential outcome had the second
approach been used with the client.
The response is supported by two or three peer-reviewed,
evidence-based sources from the literature. Resources selected
may provide only weak support for the rationale provi ded. PDFs
may not be attached.
Poor
0%–69%
0 (0%) - 23 (23%)

client and why it was the treatment of choice, or is missing.
The response includes a vauge and incomplete description of the
expected potential outcome had the second approach been used
with the client, or is missing.
The response is supported by vague or inaccurate evidence from
the literature, or is missing.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development
and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas,
flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences
are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and
lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose
statement and introduction is provided which delineates all
required criteria.--

Excellent
90%–100%
5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and
conclusion are provided that delineates all required criteria.
Good
80%–89%
4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Fair

70%–79%
3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
vague or off topic.
Poor
0%–69%
0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were
provided.

Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation--
Excellent
90%–100%
5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Good
80%–89%
4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Fair
70%–79%
3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains 3 or 4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Poor
0%–69%
0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct
APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins,
indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and
reference list.--
Excellent
90%–100%
5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
Good
80%–89%
4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Fair
70%–79%
3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
Poor
0%–69%
0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Feedback:

Total Points: 100
Name: NRNP_6645_Week7_Assignment_Rubric
NRNP/PRAC 6645 Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation
Template
Assignment: Comparing Humanistic-Existential Psychotherapy
with Other Approaches
Photo Credit: motortion / Adobe Stock
Understanding the strengths of each type of therapy and which
type of therapy is most appropriate for each patient is an
essential skill of the psychiatric-mental health nurse
practitioner. In this Assignment, you will compare humanistic-
existential therapy to another psychotherapeutic approach. You
will identify the strengths and challenges of each approach and
describe expected potential outcomes.
To prepare:
· Review the humanistic-existential psychotherapy videos in
this week’s Learning Resources.
· Reflect on humanistic-existential psychotherapeutic
approaches.
· Then, select another psychotherapeutic approach to compare
with humanistic-existential psychotherapy. The approach you

choose may be one you previously explored in the course or one
you are familiar with and especially interested in.
The Assignment
In a 2- to 3-page paper, address the following:
second approach you selected.
· Explain at least three differences between these therapies.
Include how these differences might impact your practice as a
PMHNP.
· Focusing on one video you viewed, explain why humanistic-
existential psychotherapy was utilized with the patient in the
video and why it was the treatment of choice. Describe the
expected potential outcome if the second approach had been
used with the patient.
· Support your response with specific examples from this
week’s media and at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based
sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is
considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources.
Note: The School of Nursing requires that all papers submitted
include a title page, introducti on, summary, and references. The
Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides
an example of those required elements (available at
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates ).
All papers submitted must use this formatting.Lear ning
Resources
Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and
statistical manual of mental disorders (5th

ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
· For reference as needed
Nichols, M., & Davis, S. D. (2020). The essentials of family
therapy (7th ed.). Pearson.
· Chapter 7, “Experiential Family Therapy”
Wheeler, K. (Ed.). (2020). Psychotherapy for the advanced
practice psychiatric nurse: A how-to guide for evidence-based
practice (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing.
· Chapter 6, “Humanistic-Existential and
Solution
-Focused Approaches to Psychotherapy”
Required Media (click to expand/reduce)
Grande, T. (2019, January 9). Theories of counseling –
Existential therapy [Video]. YouTube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YvAvc2aWup0

HYPERLINK
"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zl8tVTjdocI" o "James
Bugental live case consultation psychotherapy video" t
"_blank"
PsychotherapyNet. (2009, June 29). James Bugental live case
consultation psychotherapy video [Video]. YouTube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zl8tVTjdocI
HYPERLINK
"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjDNKGIvWPQ" o
"James Bugental: Humanistic psychotherapy (excerpt) – A
thinking allowed DVD w/ Jeffrey Mishlove" t "_blank"
ThinkingallowedTV. (2010, September 20). James Bugental:
Humanistic psychotherapy (excerpt) – A thinking allowed DVD
w/ Jeffrey Mishlove [Video]. YouTube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjDNKGIvWPQ
Optional Media
Biophily2. (2016, October 4). Abraham Maslow, Rollo May,
Carl Rogers – Existential psychology II (1962) [Video].
YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTTqKNI7wDo

Bugental, J. (2008). Existential-
humanistic psychotherapy [Video]. https://waldenu.kanopy.com
/video/existential-humanistic-psychotherapy
Learning Resources
Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and
statistical manual of mental disorders (5th
ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
· For reference as needed
Nichols, M., & Davis, S. D. (2020). The essentials of family
therapy (7th ed.). Pearson.
· Chapter 7, “Experiential Family Therapy”
Wheeler, K. (Ed.). (2020). Psychotherapy for the advanced
practice psychiatric nurse: A how-to guide for evidence-based
practice (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing.
· Chapter 6, “Humanistic-Existential and

· K’Watch Glucose· K’Watch Athlete· About Us· Press· Blo

· K’Watch Glucose· K’Watch Athlete· About Us· Press· Blo

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from LesleyWhitesidefv

More from LesleyWhitesidefv (20)

· K’Watch Glucose· K’Watch Athlete· About Us· Press· Blo