1. KOLONG TOL:
Community-Based Urban Revitalization
Barry Beagen
Civil and Environmental Engineering
Cornell University ‘11
internship
Mercy Corps Urban Program June 7 - August 6 2010
4. banner:
kampung ini dalam lindungan
KOMNASHAM. siapapun dilarang
mengusur, mengancam dan
meneror warga di kampung ini.
Surat dari KomnasHAM
no. 281/8 - EKOSOB/IX/2007
5.
6. lokasi komunitas kolong tol
papango warakas
ancol sungai bambu
kota tua
pejagalan penjaringan lodan
west jakarta central jakarta north jakarta
7.
8.
9.
10.
11. kolong tol di jakarta
papango warakas
ancol sungai bambu
kota tua
pejagalan penjaringan lodan
13. rawa bebek, penjaringan
kelurahan penjaringan tol pelabuhan
kecamatan penjaringan papango
warakas
sungai bambu
kelurahan penjaringan
elevated toll road rawa bebek
TOL PELABUHAN neighborhood
22. idea and process: participation as political infill
participatory training of trainers proposal facilitation
workshop leadership community
+ capacity building leadership
community techical support
exhibition stakeholders meeting
common vision
community
continued facilitation
30. BENEFITS
SOCIAL
EMPOWERMENT
community develop greater
ownership and empowered
to better their environment
CAPACITY BUILDING
community is able to
develop a common vision
and proposals
EQUAL REPRESENTATION
women and children
are represented in the
process to prevent
elite capture
31. BENEFITS
ECONOMIC
COMMUNITY INCOME
sites, services and
activities that are under
regulations can help to gen-
erate income for the com-
munity
COST SAVINGS
authorities and government
can save costs for
maintenance of structures
and ‘cleaning up’ of
squatting activities
RISK PREVENTION
when space is well-kept, fire
hazzards can be prevented
32. BENEFITS
POLITICAL
BUILD TRUST
participatory process can
develop trust between
government and
community
BETTER GOVERNANCE
urban poor communities
can resolve specific and
local issues with the
participatory process
INNOVATIVE SPATIAL
PLANNING PROCESS
the innovative method can
aid in indonesia’s move
towards democracy and
development
38. ISSUES
systemic bureaucratic inertia
lack of monitoring and potential conflicts
premanisme and cronyism
activities entrenched economic interests
health risks and fire hazards
urban poor’s contribution is not recognized
physical uncontrolled open dumping
poor drainage
flooding
poor access and lighting