The document discusses the 'Keep in Touch' (KIT) iPad app designed to enhance communication for the elderly, helping them age in place despite societal changes like globalization and urbanization. It outlines research goals, user interface considerations, and findings from the literature, emphasizing the importance of designing accessible technology for older adults. The document also includes design guidelines for creating effective touch-based interfaces tailored to the needs of seniors.

1. Keep in Touch (KiT)
Amnon Carmel
Computer Human Adaptive
Interaction Research Group (CHAI)

2. Motivation & Context

3. Motivation & Context

4. Motivation & Context
Ageing population double worldwide by 2050*
Aus. 85+ increase from 1.6% to 4.9%-7.2% **
Elderly people often prefer to “age in place”
Globalisation and urbanisation lead to
distributed families
Communication is key for elderly wellbeing
* http://transgenerational.org/aging/demographics.htm#ixzz1VdKIfz5e
** By 2056, see http://www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/3222.0

6. The Keep in Touch (KiT) iPad App

7. Keep in Touch (KiT) iPad App

8. Keep in Touch (KiT) iPad App

9. My Research

10. Research Overview
To Methodologically Explore…
What do people
actually want from
such a solution
Whether KiT in its
current version is
useful
Suitable user
interface for the
elderly

11. User Interface For the Elderly
Self Explanatory
GUI
Touch-screen
gestures
Colours, fonts &
symbols
Size & number
of objects
Location in
home

12. Is KiT Useful?
How do
people use it?
What sort of
messages?
What are the
implications?
Will it help
aging in place?
Is it useful for
the elderly?

13. What Do People Want (For Next Version)?
Phatic
technology?
Sensor-
based?
Mobile?
Gamification?
Location
based?

14. Research Goals
How to
increase
Communication
interactions
Research Best practices
for touch CHI
Goals for the elderly
Identifying
methods to
bring care
circles closer

15. Research Environment

18. Aurama

19. Aurama

20. Aurama

22. Storyplace.me

23. Storyplace.me

25. MarkerClock

27. Dude’s Magic Box

28. Positive Findings in
Literature Review

29. (Mackay, 2010)
Critical Literature Review
7 18 34

30. (Biemans, 2009), (Frank Bentley, 2011) and (Pavan Dadlani, 2010)
Critical Literature Review

31. (Rowan E. D., 2005), (Frank Bentley, 2011)
Critical Literature Review

32. (Elizabeth D. Mynatt, 2001), (Sunny Consolvo, 2004) and (Pavan Dadlani, 2010)

33. (Sunny Consolvo, 2004), (Georgios Metaxas, 2007), (Boustani, 2010) and (Frank Bentley, 2011)
Critical Literature Review

34. (Frank Bentley, 2011), (Boustani, 2010)
Critical Literature Review
MOVE TOWARDS MOBILE
DEVICES

35. Issues For Consideration
From Literature Review

36. (Georgios Metaxas, 2007), (Pavan Dadlani, 2010)
Critical Literature Review

37. (Georgios Metaxas, 2007)
Critical Literature Review

38. (Biemans, 2009) (Emile Aarts, 2004) (Frank Bentley, 2011) (Georgios Metaxas, 2007) (Mackay, 2010) (Pavan Dadlani, 2010) (Sunny Consolvo, 2004). (Aarts, 2009)
Critical Literature Review
MOSTLY
SMALL
SCALE
RESEARCH

39. (Mackay, 2010), (Birnholtz, 2010)
Critical Literature Review

40. Senior Touch-Based
Design Guidelines

41. Design Guidelines*
* Boustani, S. (2010, October 27). Designing touch-based interfaces for the elderly. Sydney, NSW,
Australia: University of Sydney, faculty of engineering, school of electrical engineering.

42. Design Guidelines*
Avoid scroll bars
Use simple large fonts with left justification
Avoid moving text
Important information should be concentrated in the centre
Keep consistent interface
Avoid red / green and blue / yellow colour combinations
Minimal to no animation
Provide larger targets
Avoid multi-touch interactions
Avoid note taking / scribble functions * Boustani, S. (2010, October 27). Designing touch-based interfaces for the elderly. Sydney, NSW,
Australia: University of Sydney, faculty of engineering, school of electrical engineering.

43. References
1) Mynatt, E.D., et al. Digital family portraits: supporting peace of mind for extended family members. in CHI '01 Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in
computing systems. 2001. Seattle, Washington: ACM.
2) Elizabeth D. Mynatt, J.R., Quan Tran, Gregory Abowd, Wendy Rogers, Itiro Siio, Designing Home Appliances for Older Adults. Cognitive Studies, 2003. 10: p. 343-352.
3) Rowan, J. and E.D. Mynatt, Digital Family Portrait Field Trial: Support for Aging in Place, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems2005,
ACM: Portland, Oregon, USA. p. 521-530.
4) Consolvo, S., P. Roessler, and B. Shelton. The CareNet Display: Lessons Learned from an In Home Evaluation of an Ambient Display. in Lecture Notes in Computer Science,
UbiComp 2004: Ubiquitous Computing. 2004. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
5) Metaxas, G., et al. Daily Activities Diarist: Supporting Aging in Place with Semantically Enriched Narratives. in Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2007 11th IFIP TC 13
International Conference. 2007. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Springer.
6) Dadlani, P., et al., Aurama: caregiver awareness for living independently with an augmented picture frame display. AI & Society, 2010. 25(2): p. 233-245.
7) Riche, Y. and W. Mackay, PeerCare: Supporting Awareness of Rhythms and Routines for Better Aging in Place. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 2010. 19(1): p. 73-
104.
8) Technology, G.I.o. Dude's Magic Box! 2007 [cited 2011 12/09/2011]; Information regarding the 'Dued'es Magic Box!' system including several imges. ]. Available from:
http://home.cc.gatech.edu/jimRowan/5.
9) Saslis-Lagoudakis, G.C., Keith ; Fitto, Dan. Hermes@Home: Keeping in touch with the home. in Designing for Collaborative as well as Indivualised Environment. 2006. Sussex, UK:
University of Sussex.
10) Georgios Saslis-Lagoudakis, K.C., Dan Fitto, Alan Dix, Mark Rouncefield, Hermes@Home: supporting awareness and intimacy between distant family members, in Proceedings of
the 18th Australia conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Design: Activities, Artefacts and Environments2006, ACM: Sydney, Australia. p. 23-30.
11) Bentley, F. and S.K. Chowdhury. Serendipitous family stories: using findings from a study on family communication to share family history. in 12th ACM international conference.
2010. Copenhagen, Denmark: ACM.
12) Bentley, F., S. Basapur, and S.K. Chowdhury. Promoting Intergenerational Communication Through Location-Based Asynchronous Video Communication. in UbiComp 2011. 2011.
Beijing,China: ACM.
13) Boustani, S., Designing touch-based interfaces for the elderly, 2010, The University of Sydney: Sydney, Australia.
14) LLC, A. Interface Design Guidelines for Users of All Ages. 2001.
15) Kim, S., et al., Usability of car dashboard displays for elder drivers, in Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems2011, ACM: Vancouver, BC,
Canada.
16) Olwal, A., D. Lachanas, and E. Zacharouli, OldGen: mobile phone personalization for older adults, in Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing
systems2011, ACM: Vancouver, BC, Canada.
17) Mahmud, A.A., et al., Designing and evaluating the tabletop game experience for senior citizens, in Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction:
building bridges2008, ACM: Lund, Sweden.

44. References
18) Alan F. Newell, A.D., Mick J. Smith, Peter Gregor, Designing a portal for older users: A case study of an industrial/academic collaboration. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact.,
2006. 13(3): p. 347-375.
19) Kankainen, A. and V. Lehtinen, Creative personal projects of the elderly as active engagements with interactive media technology, in Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference
on Creativity and cognition2011, ACM: Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
20) Kirk, D.S., et al., Opening up the family archive, in Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work2010, ACM: Savannah, Georgia, USA. p.
261-270.
21) Stößel, C., H. Wandke, and L. Blessing, Gestural Interfaces for Elderly Users: Help or Hindrance?
22) Gesture in Embodied Communication and Human-Computer Interaction, S. Kopp and I. Wachsmuth, Editors. 2010, Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. p. 269-280.
23) Wacharamanotham, C., et al., Evaluating swabbing: a touchscreen input method for elderly users with tremor, in Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors
in computing systems2011, ACM: Vancouver, BC, Canada. p. 623-626.
24) Piper, A.M., Supporting medical communication with a multimodal surface computer, in Proceedings of the 28th of the international conference extended abstracts on Human
factors in computing systems2010, ACM: Atlanta, Georgia, USA. p. 2899-2902.
25) Piper, A.M., R. Campbell, and J.D. Hollan, Exploring the accessibility and appeal of surface computing for older adult health care support, in Proceedings of the 28th
international conference on Human factors in computing systems2010, ACM: Atlanta, Georgia, USA. p. 907-916.
26) Vatavu, R.D., Augmented photoware interfaces for affective human-human interactions, in Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Affective interaction in natural
environments2010, ACM: Firenze, Italy. p. 93-96.
27) Cunningham, A., et al., TableMouse: a novel multiuser tabletop pointing device, in Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction
Special Interest Group: Design: Open 24/72009, ACM: Melbourne, Australia. p. 169-176.
28) Frank, B.P.D.H.F.P.G.M.R.H.S.L.G.K.J.K.B.V., A Special Kind of Intimacy: Sustaining Sociability with Ubiquitous Computing for the Inter-Generational Family, 2006, University of
Sydney.
29) Gaver, B., Provocative Awareness. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 2002. 11(3): p. 475-493.
30) Aarts, E. and B. de Ruyter, New research perspectives on Ambient Intelligence. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 2009. Volume 1(Number 1 / 2009): p.
5-14.
31) Consolvo, S., et al., Technology for care networks of elders. Pervasive Computing, IEEE, 2004. 3(2): p. 22-29.
32) Biemans, M., et al. Let's stay in touch: sharing photos for restoring social connectedness between rehabilitants, friends and family. in Proceedings of the 11th international ACM
SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. 2009. Pittsburgh, PA, USA: ACM.
33) Aarts, E., Ambient intelligence: a multimedia perspective. Multimedia, IEEE, 2004. 11(1): p. 12-19.
34) Birnholtz, J. and M. Jones-Rounds, Independence and interaction: understanding seniors' privacy and awareness needs for aging in place, in Proceedings of the 28th
international conference on Human factors in computing systems2010, ACM: Atlanta, Georgia, USA. p. 143-152.
35) Matters, T.D. The Demographics of Aging. 2010 [cited 2011 03/10/2011]; Statistics about aging population]. Available from:
http://transgenerational.org/aging/demographics.htm#ixzz1VdKIfz5e.
36) ABS, A.B.o.S. Population Projections, Australia, 2006 to 2101. 2008 [cited 2011 03/10/2011]; Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/3222.0.

45. Thank You
Amnon Carmel
acar4721@uni.sydney.edu.au