This document provides information about the 53rd edition of the Journal Quality List compiled by Professor Anne-Wil Harzing. It includes a revision history of the list and acknowledges contributions from others in compiling the list. The document discusses various journal ranking lists that are included in the Journal Quality List, providing information on how each list was constructed and key for interpreting the rankings.
Scientific Impact of Institutions, Academic Journals and Researchers in the R...Mirko Spiroski
The rank of the Macedonia according the SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) is 99th in the world and 18th in the Eastern Europe.
Out of 20 Universities in Macedonia, only Ss Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje and University St Clement of Bitola are listed in SCImago Institutions Rankings (SIR) for 2013.
Very small number of Macedonian scholarly journals are included in WOS (1), PubMed (1), PubMed Central (1), SCOPUS (5), and Google Scholar metrics (6).
SCOPUS rank and SCOPUS H-index are different for the top 10 authors from Macedonia.
Top twenty Macedonian authors published 72.4% of the total number of abstracts indexed in PubMed.
There is urgent need for organized improvement of the quality of researchers, scholarly journals, and institutions in Macedonia in order to achieve higher international standards.
Manuscriptedit has professional online and in-house editors with excellent writing & editing skills and proven record of publishing in high impact factor international journals in English language
Il ruolo degli editori: criteri per valutare l'informazione scientifica di qu...GIDIF-RBM
Massimiliano Carloni, Strategic Business Manager, Thomson Reuters
Intervento al workshop GIDIF-RBM a Bibiostar 2016: "Disinformazione in rete fra scienza e divulgazione: il ruolo del bibliotecario biomedico". Una rassegna sulle fonti di informazione autorevole sulla medicina integrata.
Milano, Palazzo delle Stelline
18 marzo 2016
Scientific Impact of Institutions, Academic Journals and Researchers in the R...Mirko Spiroski
The rank of the Macedonia according the SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) is 99th in the world and 18th in the Eastern Europe.
Out of 20 Universities in Macedonia, only Ss Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje and University St Clement of Bitola are listed in SCImago Institutions Rankings (SIR) for 2013.
Very small number of Macedonian scholarly journals are included in WOS (1), PubMed (1), PubMed Central (1), SCOPUS (5), and Google Scholar metrics (6).
SCOPUS rank and SCOPUS H-index are different for the top 10 authors from Macedonia.
Top twenty Macedonian authors published 72.4% of the total number of abstracts indexed in PubMed.
There is urgent need for organized improvement of the quality of researchers, scholarly journals, and institutions in Macedonia in order to achieve higher international standards.
Manuscriptedit has professional online and in-house editors with excellent writing & editing skills and proven record of publishing in high impact factor international journals in English language
Il ruolo degli editori: criteri per valutare l'informazione scientifica di qu...GIDIF-RBM
Massimiliano Carloni, Strategic Business Manager, Thomson Reuters
Intervento al workshop GIDIF-RBM a Bibiostar 2016: "Disinformazione in rete fra scienza e divulgazione: il ruolo del bibliotecario biomedico". Una rassegna sulle fonti di informazione autorevole sulla medicina integrata.
Milano, Palazzo delle Stelline
18 marzo 2016
Professor Michael Rowlinson, Queen Mary, University of London, UK presented this seminar "Where Next for the ABS Guide" as part of the Whitaker Institute Seminar Series at the Whitaker Institute on 1st February 2012.
It’s important to remember that the impact factor only looks at an average citation and that a journal may have a few highly cited papers that greatly increase its impact factor, while other papers in that same journal may not be cited at all. Therefore, there is no direct correlation between an individual article’s citation frequency or quality and the journal impact factor.
This presentation was provided by Jonathan Adams of Clarivate Analytics during the NISO event, "Is This Still Working? Incentives to Publish, Metrics, and New Reward Systems," held on February 20, 2019.
SPSS is powerful to analyze Educational data. This paper intends to support educational leaders the benefits of data analyzing with applied SPSS. It showed the data analysis of qualified rates such as bad, neutral, good and very good on the subjects. As SPSS's background algorithms, it showed the cross tabulation algorithm for cross tabulation tables. And then Sample data ‘course evaluation.sav' was downloaded from Google and was analyzed and viewed. It used IBM SPSS statistics version 23 and PYTHON version 3.7. Aung Cho | Aung Si Thu ""Educational Data Analysis by Applied SPSS"" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-3 | Issue-4 , June 2019, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd25092.pdf
Paper URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/computer-science/data-miining/25092/educational-data-analysis-by-applied-spss/aung-cho
1
F_Bus Individual Report (40%)
Submission Deadline: Midnight, 23:59, Sunday 1st December 2019
You will need to choose a company from the list below.
List of Companies
John Lewis Arcadia group
Dyson UK Merlin Entertainment
Virgin Atlantic Unilever
NB: Some of the above companies have subsidiaries, so take care in your research to ensure you focus on one
particular area.
You are required to conduct an analysis of environmental factors relevant to your chosen company and
how the company responds to these environmental factors, which may be subject to change.
You will be expected to conduct external environmental analysis (PEST), Micro analysis (Customers,
competitors and suppliers analysis) and internal analysis (SWOT).
Based on the SWOT analysis, you are expected to make recommendations for the company.
The report will demonstrate your understanding of the PEST, Micro analysis and SWOT. You will apply the
models to evaluate the company and present an analysis making reference to both internal and external
factors. The learning outcomes to be assessed are:
• Recognise and evaluate the general objectives of business and the context in which it operates
• Discuss the nature, characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of different forms of business and
organisational structure
• Appreciate how effective development of the marketing process and be used as a source of competitive
advantages
2
The Report Structure
-You are required to provide a report that includes the following sections:
1. Executive Summary
The main focus of the summary is to explain the purpose of the report, key findings and main recommendations.
Keep it very short. The summary should briefly introduce the target company. The suggested format is as follows:
1.1 Background: a brief paragraph introducing the target company and its products. Ensure you include brief
discussions of the structure, sector and nature of the business.
1.2 Key findings: a brief summary (not bullet points) of the key strengths and weaknesses that have emerged from
your report, as well as opportunities and threats.
1.3 Main Recommendations: a summary of the main recommendations based on the analysis.
It is recommended that you do not complete points 1.2 and 1.3 until you have completed the whole report.
2. The Macro External Environment Analysis (PEST)
-Identify and analyse the macro external environment using PEST analysis.
PEST analysis looks into environmental forces that influence the company or its products. It is exploring the impact
of environmental forces (Political, Economic, Social, and Technological) on the company. See the figure below.
The importance of each force may vary from company to company. You need to discuss the relative impact of
different environmental forces and how they influence the company.
3. The Micro External Environment A ...
Running head: COMPANY NAME 1
COMPANY NAME
5
Company Description and SWOT analysis
First Name Last Name
Strayer University
BUS 599
Prof. Andrea Banto and Prof. Adrian Allen
January 15, 2019
Due: Week 3, worth 100 points
Length: The assignment should be 3 to 5 pages, excluding title page and reference page
Important:
· Review the description of this assignment in the course guide or Blackboard and use the tips provided along with this template to help you in your writing.
· Use the textbook and review the recommended pages. Note that your textbook has sample plans at the end of each paper. They are great examples of content.
· Review the grading rubric before writing. Know what you are graded for. Always look at the “exemplary” section.
Notes:
· Please remove the text in red throughout the paper and replace with your information.
· Leave the text in black as it is. You are required to have a heading for each of the sections in your paper.
· Use APA format
· The references must be on a separate page at the end of the paper.
Company Description and SWOT analysis
Company Name
· Provide a brief introduction of the NAB company (name)
· Explain the significance of the name of your NAB company.
· Describe the non-alcoholic beverage you will produce and sell.
Mission Statement
· Write the mission statement (use quotation marks)
· Explain the components of the mission statement and the reasoning for their selection.
Trends in the industry
· Describe the trends in the industry. Try to be specific for your chosen category of beverage. Project future growth rate and why do you think this segment has potential (p.88 in text)
· Provide 3 reasons for choosing the specific beverage and explain each.
Strategic position
· Choose one strategic position from the text (page 142-143) and discuss why you believe this would be the best position for your company.
· Explain the approach to be used to implement this position to stand out from similar products.
Distribution
· Provide an overview of the company’s distribution channels
· Explain how the product will reach the end users. Provide the rationale for your selected method.
Risks
· Outline at least 3 types of risks your company is facing (including regulatory risks). Check pages 148-149.
· Discuss each and explain why you think the company is facing these risks and how your company will mitigate each risks.
SWOT Analysis
· Complete the table below (at least 4 in each category). You must use this matrix. Use bullets for each item in the SWOT.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Threats
· Briefly describe the key items in each category under the table.
References
Be sure to cite all your sources. Use APA to format all the references. Wikipedia and other Websites do not quality as academic resources
Here are exampl.
Cracking the Workplace Discipline Code Main.pptxWorkforce Group
Cultivating and maintaining discipline within teams is a critical differentiator for successful organisations.
Forward-thinking leaders and business managers understand the impact that discipline has on organisational success. A disciplined workforce operates with clarity, focus, and a shared understanding of expectations, ultimately driving better results, optimising productivity, and facilitating seamless collaboration.
Although discipline is not a one-size-fits-all approach, it can help create a work environment that encourages personal growth and accountability rather than solely relying on punitive measures.
In this deck, you will learn the significance of workplace discipline for organisational success. You’ll also learn
• Four (4) workplace discipline methods you should consider
• The best and most practical approach to implementing workplace discipline.
• Three (3) key tips to maintain a disciplined workplace.
3.0 Project 2_ Developing My Brand Identity Kit.pptxtanyjahb
A personal brand exploration presentation summarizes an individual's unique qualities and goals, covering strengths, values, passions, and target audience. It helps individuals understand what makes them stand out, their desired image, and how they aim to achieve it.
Professor Michael Rowlinson, Queen Mary, University of London, UK presented this seminar "Where Next for the ABS Guide" as part of the Whitaker Institute Seminar Series at the Whitaker Institute on 1st February 2012.
It’s important to remember that the impact factor only looks at an average citation and that a journal may have a few highly cited papers that greatly increase its impact factor, while other papers in that same journal may not be cited at all. Therefore, there is no direct correlation between an individual article’s citation frequency or quality and the journal impact factor.
This presentation was provided by Jonathan Adams of Clarivate Analytics during the NISO event, "Is This Still Working? Incentives to Publish, Metrics, and New Reward Systems," held on February 20, 2019.
SPSS is powerful to analyze Educational data. This paper intends to support educational leaders the benefits of data analyzing with applied SPSS. It showed the data analysis of qualified rates such as bad, neutral, good and very good on the subjects. As SPSS's background algorithms, it showed the cross tabulation algorithm for cross tabulation tables. And then Sample data ‘course evaluation.sav' was downloaded from Google and was analyzed and viewed. It used IBM SPSS statistics version 23 and PYTHON version 3.7. Aung Cho | Aung Si Thu ""Educational Data Analysis by Applied SPSS"" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-3 | Issue-4 , June 2019, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd25092.pdf
Paper URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/computer-science/data-miining/25092/educational-data-analysis-by-applied-spss/aung-cho
1
F_Bus Individual Report (40%)
Submission Deadline: Midnight, 23:59, Sunday 1st December 2019
You will need to choose a company from the list below.
List of Companies
John Lewis Arcadia group
Dyson UK Merlin Entertainment
Virgin Atlantic Unilever
NB: Some of the above companies have subsidiaries, so take care in your research to ensure you focus on one
particular area.
You are required to conduct an analysis of environmental factors relevant to your chosen company and
how the company responds to these environmental factors, which may be subject to change.
You will be expected to conduct external environmental analysis (PEST), Micro analysis (Customers,
competitors and suppliers analysis) and internal analysis (SWOT).
Based on the SWOT analysis, you are expected to make recommendations for the company.
The report will demonstrate your understanding of the PEST, Micro analysis and SWOT. You will apply the
models to evaluate the company and present an analysis making reference to both internal and external
factors. The learning outcomes to be assessed are:
• Recognise and evaluate the general objectives of business and the context in which it operates
• Discuss the nature, characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of different forms of business and
organisational structure
• Appreciate how effective development of the marketing process and be used as a source of competitive
advantages
2
The Report Structure
-You are required to provide a report that includes the following sections:
1. Executive Summary
The main focus of the summary is to explain the purpose of the report, key findings and main recommendations.
Keep it very short. The summary should briefly introduce the target company. The suggested format is as follows:
1.1 Background: a brief paragraph introducing the target company and its products. Ensure you include brief
discussions of the structure, sector and nature of the business.
1.2 Key findings: a brief summary (not bullet points) of the key strengths and weaknesses that have emerged from
your report, as well as opportunities and threats.
1.3 Main Recommendations: a summary of the main recommendations based on the analysis.
It is recommended that you do not complete points 1.2 and 1.3 until you have completed the whole report.
2. The Macro External Environment Analysis (PEST)
-Identify and analyse the macro external environment using PEST analysis.
PEST analysis looks into environmental forces that influence the company or its products. It is exploring the impact
of environmental forces (Political, Economic, Social, and Technological) on the company. See the figure below.
The importance of each force may vary from company to company. You need to discuss the relative impact of
different environmental forces and how they influence the company.
3. The Micro External Environment A ...
Running head: COMPANY NAME 1
COMPANY NAME
5
Company Description and SWOT analysis
First Name Last Name
Strayer University
BUS 599
Prof. Andrea Banto and Prof. Adrian Allen
January 15, 2019
Due: Week 3, worth 100 points
Length: The assignment should be 3 to 5 pages, excluding title page and reference page
Important:
· Review the description of this assignment in the course guide or Blackboard and use the tips provided along with this template to help you in your writing.
· Use the textbook and review the recommended pages. Note that your textbook has sample plans at the end of each paper. They are great examples of content.
· Review the grading rubric before writing. Know what you are graded for. Always look at the “exemplary” section.
Notes:
· Please remove the text in red throughout the paper and replace with your information.
· Leave the text in black as it is. You are required to have a heading for each of the sections in your paper.
· Use APA format
· The references must be on a separate page at the end of the paper.
Company Description and SWOT analysis
Company Name
· Provide a brief introduction of the NAB company (name)
· Explain the significance of the name of your NAB company.
· Describe the non-alcoholic beverage you will produce and sell.
Mission Statement
· Write the mission statement (use quotation marks)
· Explain the components of the mission statement and the reasoning for their selection.
Trends in the industry
· Describe the trends in the industry. Try to be specific for your chosen category of beverage. Project future growth rate and why do you think this segment has potential (p.88 in text)
· Provide 3 reasons for choosing the specific beverage and explain each.
Strategic position
· Choose one strategic position from the text (page 142-143) and discuss why you believe this would be the best position for your company.
· Explain the approach to be used to implement this position to stand out from similar products.
Distribution
· Provide an overview of the company’s distribution channels
· Explain how the product will reach the end users. Provide the rationale for your selected method.
Risks
· Outline at least 3 types of risks your company is facing (including regulatory risks). Check pages 148-149.
· Discuss each and explain why you think the company is facing these risks and how your company will mitigate each risks.
SWOT Analysis
· Complete the table below (at least 4 in each category). You must use this matrix. Use bullets for each item in the SWOT.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Threats
· Briefly describe the key items in each category under the table.
References
Be sure to cite all your sources. Use APA to format all the references. Wikipedia and other Websites do not quality as academic resources
Here are exampl.
Cracking the Workplace Discipline Code Main.pptxWorkforce Group
Cultivating and maintaining discipline within teams is a critical differentiator for successful organisations.
Forward-thinking leaders and business managers understand the impact that discipline has on organisational success. A disciplined workforce operates with clarity, focus, and a shared understanding of expectations, ultimately driving better results, optimising productivity, and facilitating seamless collaboration.
Although discipline is not a one-size-fits-all approach, it can help create a work environment that encourages personal growth and accountability rather than solely relying on punitive measures.
In this deck, you will learn the significance of workplace discipline for organisational success. You’ll also learn
• Four (4) workplace discipline methods you should consider
• The best and most practical approach to implementing workplace discipline.
• Three (3) key tips to maintain a disciplined workplace.
3.0 Project 2_ Developing My Brand Identity Kit.pptxtanyjahb
A personal brand exploration presentation summarizes an individual's unique qualities and goals, covering strengths, values, passions, and target audience. It helps individuals understand what makes them stand out, their desired image, and how they aim to achieve it.
Personal Brand Statement:
As an Army veteran dedicated to lifelong learning, I bring a disciplined, strategic mindset to my pursuits. I am constantly expanding my knowledge to innovate and lead effectively. My journey is driven by a commitment to excellence, and to make a meaningful impact in the world.
India Orthopedic Devices Market: Unlocking Growth Secrets, Trends and Develop...Kumar Satyam
According to TechSci Research report, “India Orthopedic Devices Market -Industry Size, Share, Trends, Competition Forecast & Opportunities, 2030”, the India Orthopedic Devices Market stood at USD 1,280.54 Million in 2024 and is anticipated to grow with a CAGR of 7.84% in the forecast period, 2026-2030F. The India Orthopedic Devices Market is being driven by several factors. The most prominent ones include an increase in the elderly population, who are more prone to orthopedic conditions such as osteoporosis and arthritis. Moreover, the rise in sports injuries and road accidents are also contributing to the demand for orthopedic devices. Advances in technology and the introduction of innovative implants and prosthetics have further propelled the market growth. Additionally, government initiatives aimed at improving healthcare infrastructure and the increasing prevalence of lifestyle diseases have led to an upward trend in orthopedic surgeries, thereby fueling the market demand for these devices.
Remote sensing and monitoring are changing the mining industry for the better. These are providing innovative solutions to long-standing challenges. Those related to exploration, extraction, and overall environmental management by mining technology companies Odisha. These technologies make use of satellite imaging, aerial photography and sensors to collect data that might be inaccessible or from hazardous locations. With the use of this technology, mining operations are becoming increasingly efficient. Let us gain more insight into the key aspects associated with remote sensing and monitoring when it comes to mining.
Accpac to QuickBooks Conversion Navigating the Transition with Online Account...PaulBryant58
This article provides a comprehensive guide on how to
effectively manage the convert Accpac to QuickBooks , with a particular focus on utilizing online accounting services to streamline the process.
Enterprise Excellence is Inclusive Excellence.pdfKaiNexus
Enterprise excellence and inclusive excellence are closely linked, and real-world challenges have shown that both are essential to the success of any organization. To achieve enterprise excellence, organizations must focus on improving their operations and processes while creating an inclusive environment that engages everyone. In this interactive session, the facilitator will highlight commonly established business practices and how they limit our ability to engage everyone every day. More importantly, though, participants will likely gain increased awareness of what we can do differently to maximize enterprise excellence through deliberate inclusion.
What is Enterprise Excellence?
Enterprise Excellence is a holistic approach that's aimed at achieving world-class performance across all aspects of the organization.
What might I learn?
A way to engage all in creating Inclusive Excellence. Lessons from the US military and their parallels to the story of Harry Potter. How belt systems and CI teams can destroy inclusive practices. How leadership language invites people to the party. There are three things leaders can do to engage everyone every day: maximizing psychological safety to create environments where folks learn, contribute, and challenge the status quo.
Who might benefit? Anyone and everyone leading folks from the shop floor to top floor.
Dr. William Harvey is a seasoned Operations Leader with extensive experience in chemical processing, manufacturing, and operations management. At Michelman, he currently oversees multiple sites, leading teams in strategic planning and coaching/practicing continuous improvement. William is set to start his eighth year of teaching at the University of Cincinnati where he teaches marketing, finance, and management. William holds various certifications in change management, quality, leadership, operational excellence, team building, and DiSC, among others.
The world of search engine optimization (SEO) is buzzing with discussions after Google confirmed that around 2,500 leaked internal documents related to its Search feature are indeed authentic. The revelation has sparked significant concerns within the SEO community. The leaked documents were initially reported by SEO experts Rand Fishkin and Mike King, igniting widespread analysis and discourse. For More Info:- https://news.arihantwebtech.com/search-disrupted-googles-leaked-documents-rock-the-seo-world/
RMD24 | Retail media: hoe zet je dit in als je geen AH of Unilever bent? Heid...BBPMedia1
Grote partijen zijn al een tijdje onderweg met retail media. Ondertussen worden in dit domein ook de kansen zichtbaar voor andere spelers in de markt. Maar met die kansen ontstaan ook vragen: Zelf retail media worden of erop adverteren? In welke fase van de funnel past het en hoe integreer je het in een mediaplan? Wat is nu precies het verschil met marketplaces en Programmatic ads? In dit half uur beslechten we de dilemma's en krijg je antwoorden op wanneer het voor jou tijd is om de volgende stap te zetten.
Skye Residences | Extended Stay Residences Near Toronto Airportmarketingjdass
Experience unparalleled EXTENDED STAY and comfort at Skye Residences located just minutes from Toronto Airport. Discover sophisticated accommodations tailored for discerning travelers.
Website Link :
https://skyeresidences.com/
https://skyeresidences.com/about-us/
https://skyeresidences.com/gallery/
https://skyeresidences.com/rooms/
https://skyeresidences.com/near-by-attractions/
https://skyeresidences.com/commute/
https://skyeresidences.com/contact/
https://skyeresidences.com/queen-suite-with-sofa-bed/
https://skyeresidences.com/queen-suite-with-sofa-bed-and-balcony/
https://skyeresidences.com/queen-suite-with-sofa-bed-accessible/
https://skyeresidences.com/2-bedroom-deluxe-queen-suite-with-sofa-bed/
https://skyeresidences.com/2-bedroom-deluxe-king-queen-suite-with-sofa-bed/
https://skyeresidences.com/2-bedroom-deluxe-queen-suite-with-sofa-bed-accessible/
#Skye Residences Etobicoke, #Skye Residences Near Toronto Airport, #Skye Residences Toronto, #Skye Hotel Toronto, #Skye Hotel Near Toronto Airport, #Hotel Near Toronto Airport, #Near Toronto Airport Accommodation, #Suites Near Toronto Airport, #Etobicoke Suites Near Airport, #Hotel Near Toronto Pearson International Airport, #Toronto Airport Suite Rentals, #Pearson Airport Hotel Suites
Explore our most comprehensive guide on lookback analysis at SafePaaS, covering access governance and how it can transform modern ERP audits. Browse now!
Global Interconnection Group Joint Venture[960] (1).pdf
Jql journal1
1. 1
JOURNAL QUALITY LIST
Fifty-third Edition, 8March 2015
Compiled and edited by ProfessorAnne-WilHarzing
The editor welcomes corrections and additions
Email: anne-wil@harzing.com
Website: http://www.harzing.com
Revision history
Fifty-third Edition, 8 March 2015
Fifty-second Edition, 11 February 2014
Fifty-first Edition, 10 December 2013
Fiftieth Edition, 5 July 2013
Forty-ninth Edition, 8 June 2013
Forty-eight Edition, 5 February 2013 (recalled, donotuse)
Forty-seventh Edition, 17 August 2012
Forty-sixth Edition, 13 July 2012
Forty-fifth Edition, 1 April 2012
Forty-fourth Edition, 5 March 2012
Forty-third Edition, 1 January 2012
Forty-second Edition, 16 October 2011
Forty-first Edition, 20 July 2011
Fortieth Edition, 17 June 2011
Thirty-ninth Edition, 23 April 2011
Thirty-eight Edition, 4 February 2011
Thirty-seventh Edition, 27 May 2010
Thirty-sixth Edition, 6 February 2010
Thirty-fifth Edition, 18 December 2009
Thirty-fourth Edition, 3 July 2009
Thirty-third Edition, 4 May 2009
Thirty-second Edition, 26 September 2008
Thirty-first Edition, 31 May 2008
Thirtieth Edition, 28 December 2007
Twenty-ninth Edition, 19 November 2007
Twenty-eighth Edition, 12 September 2007
Twenty-seventh Edition, 23 July 2007
Twenty-sixth Edition, 5 March 2007
Twenty-fifth Edition, 1 February 2007
Twenty-fourth Edition, 23 November 2006
Twenty-third Edition, 12 October 2006
Twenty-second Edition, 6 August 2006
Twenty-first Edition, 23 June 2006
Twentieth Edition, 7 May 2006
Nineteenth Edition, 7 March 2006
Eighteenth Edition, 6 January, 2006
Seventeenth Edition, 4 December, 2005
Sixteenth Edition, 13 November 2005
Fifteenth Edition, 23 July 2005
Fourteenth Edition, 28 March 2005
Thirteenth Edition, 10 January 2005
Twelfth Edition, 13 November 2004
Eleventh Edition, 11 July 2004
Tenth Edition, 9 June 2004
Ninth Edition, 6 April 2004
Eight Edition, 9 January 2004
Seventh Edition, 26 October 2003
Sixth Edition, 12 July 2003
Fifth Edition, 15 February 2003
Fourth Edition, 17 November, 2002
Third Edition, 18 July 2002
Second Edition, 13 October 2000
First Edition, 17 July 2000
Copyright 2000-2015Anne-WilHarzing. Allrights reserved.
Permission to use or copy this list in its entirety is hereby granted, provided that all copies include this title
page, copyright notice, and all explanatory notes. All other uses, copying, or other forms of reproduction are
prohibited.
2. 2
JOURNAL QUALITY LIST
Fifty-third Edition, 8 March 2015
Compiled and edited by Professor Anne-Wil Harzing, http://www.harzing.com
Introduction
The Journal Quality List is published primarily to assist academics to target papers at journals of
an appropriate standard. We would be concerned if the list were used for staff evaluation pur-
poses in a mechanistic way. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the
Journal Quality List, we recommend that it be checked before used extensively for evaluation
purposes. The editor will not be held responsible for omissions or errors.
Acknowledgements
The first version of the JQL was collated when the editor was with the University of Bradford
School of Management (UBSM). The editor gratefully acknowledges the assistance and contri-
butions of the following people: Kathy Cousens (UBSM) for the initial data entry work, Victoria
Lim, Ulrike Magner, Sebastian Reiche, Dinuka Wijetunga, Shea Fan, Sofie Schütte, Markus
Goelz (all University of Melbourne) and Sara de Marco (Middlesex University) for data entry
work between 2006 and 2015, Yves Barlette, Jos Benders, Yehuda Baruch, Malachy Carey,
Graham Hooley, Gunther Maier, and Andrew Kirchner for pointing out and supplying me with
various journal ranking lists and providing corrections.
Subjectareas and abbreviations
Abbreviation Subjectarea
Bus Hist Business History
Comm Communication
Economics Economics
Entrep Entrepreneurship
F&A Finance & Accounting
Gen & Strat General & Strategy
IB International Business
Innovation Innovation
Marketing Marketing
MIS, KM Management Information Systems, Knowledge Management
OB/OS, HRM, IR Organisation Behavior/Studies, Human Resource Management, In-
dustrial Relations
OR, MS & POM Operations Research, Management Science, Production & Opera-
tions Management
PSM Public Sector Management
Psychology Psychology
Sociology Sociology
Tourism Tourism
3. 3
DISCUSSION OF THE RANKINGS
[The 53rd edition removed several older rankings that were created between 2001-2005 and had
not been updated since by their providers. It also removed a range of journals in non-core Econom-
ics & Business areas that – after removing the older rankings – only appeared on a single ranking
list].
EJIS 2007 —European JournalofInformation Systems 2007
Mingers & Harzing
This list provides an integrated ranking of all journal rankings available in the JQL as at Decem-
ber 2005 (17th edition). The details of its construction as well as a range of additional analyses
have been published in the European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 16, no. 4. An earlier
working paper is also available from http://www.harzing.com/papers.htm#jqlrank. Two rankings
are available (EJIS07 and EJIS07-CI); the second ranking includes the JIF for 2004 as part of
its analysis.
[Editor’s note] Some journals had to be removed from this analysis because they had a very lim-
ited number of rankings (e.g. all communication journals that were only ranked on the UQ list).
Further, many journals have been added to the JQL since this list was constructed. Hence, rat-
ings for some 200 journals are not available.
UQ 2007 —University ofQueensland JournalRating 2007
This list was originally constructed in 2003 in three stages:
1. Construction of a mega-database (over 2,000 titles) based on ratings and rankings from
over 120 sources.
2. Allocation of each title to one of 5 tiers (1 = highest, 5 = lowest) on the basis of the second
highest rating from the rating/ranking sources (i.e., the rating must be from at least two sour-
ces).
3. The data base was supplied to the six discipline cluster leaders in the school as a resource
that they could use to construct the official list (which comprises 588 journals). They could
use the mega-database or any other source to justify each journal's rating.
[Editor’s note] In order to keep the JQL to a manageable length, lower-ranked journals (ranking
4&5) of the UQ list were only added if they already featured in the JQL. An exception was made
for Entrepreneurship/Communication journals, since they were underrepresented in the other
ranking lists included in the JQL.
[Editor’s note] The JQL includes the updated (2007) version of the UQ list. Unfortunately, no in-
formation is available on the process that was followed in updating in the 2003 list.
Rank Interpretation
1 Highest quality rating
2
Intermediate quality ratings3
4
5 Lowest quality rating
AST 2008 —Aston March 2008
New version of the Aston lists originally published in 1999/2003/2006. The 1999 list was based
on a large survey of opinions of academics of the Midlands universities. In 2003 this list was
sent to Aston research convenors for discussion within their group and each group then sent in
revised lists which formed the basis of the new rankings. Anybody who wanted to add a journal
was asked to provide evidence, preferably citation evidence from the World of Knowledge Data
Base, but failing that expert opinions in the field from other universities. In the 2006 “rankings
4. 4
are made on the basis of citation rates, impact factors, interrogation of data bases and the eval-
uations of senior academic staff in Aston Business School and other international business
schools. They are subject to change as the standing and impact of journals changes.” No infor-
mation was available about the procedures for the 2008 update.
[Editor’s note] Journals that were mentioned on the Aston 2008 list, but not on any other list,
were only included if they had at least a 3 ranking. Law journals were excluded. Where journals
were ranked differently in different subdisciplines, the highest rating was used.]
Rank Interpretation
4 World leading
3 Internationally excellent
2 Recognised internationally
1 Recognised nationally
0 Unclassified
WIE 2008 —WU Wien JournalRating May 2008
List developed by the Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien (Vienna University of Economics and Busi-
ness Administration). For more information and the complete list see: http://bach.wu-
wien.ac.at/bachapp/cgi-bin/fides/fides.aspx/fides.aspx?journal=true;lang=DE
The 2001 journal list was updated in the context of an incentive scheme that provided financial
incentives for publication in top journals. As such the 2008 list only contains journals with an A+
and A ranking.
[Editor’s note] Journals that were mentioned on the WIE 2008 list, but were not included in the
JQL were only included if they had an A+ ranking.
Den 2011 —Danish Ministry Journallist2011
In collaboration with academics, the Danish Ministry publishes an annual list of journals it recog-
nizes as peer-reviewed and of a particular quality. It assessed those included in the list with ei-
ther a score of 1 (low) or 2 (high). Exact details of this list are unknown, but around 85 % of jour-
nals are scored 1, with the remaining 15% scored 2. Of the 900+ journals in the JQL more than
40% are scored 2, clearly indicating that the JQL tends to focus on high quality journals.
Rank Interpretation
2 Top journals
1 Other recognized journals
HEC 2011 —Hautes Études Commerciales de Paris Ranking ListJuly 2011
The overall approach to construct this list consisted of searching for an algorithm to combine the
different sources of information in a standardized way across all journals of all fields. These
sources were expert opinions (solicited from outside of HEC), existing rankings, and journal im-
pact factors. Borderline cases were then discussed and some corrections made. All corrections
were based on additional factual information (e.g. acceptance rates, evolution of impact factors).
The following five existing ranking were used:
ABS — Association of Business Schools Academic Journal Quality Guide
CNRS — Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (2008), section 37, Economics and Man-
agement
ERIM — Erasmus Research Institute of Management Journals Listing (2006)
FT— Financial Times Journal List (2010)
VHB — Verband der Hochschullehrer für Betriebswirtschaft (2008)
5. 5
A detailed description of the method is available at the following address: www.hec.edu/li-
brary/HEC‐journal‐list‐method
[Editor’s note] In order to keep the JQL to a manageable length, lower-ranked journals (ranking
B-C) of the HEC list were only added if they already featured in the JQL. The same principle
was applied to French-language journals. Also excluded were journals in the area of law and
statistics (unless related to Business & Economics).
Rank Interpretation
A Highest quality rating
B+
Intermediate quality ratings
B
C Lowest quality rating
UQ 2011 —University ofQueensland Adjusted ERA Rankings List
This list is a combination of the UQ 2007 list and the ERA (Excellence in Research Australia)
list. Information on the ERA list is available at: http://www.arc.gov.au/era/era_journal_list.htm. It
is a "Revised ERA" list in that some journals are ranked higher on the UQBS journal list and
their higher score is maintained, but no journal is ranked lower than its ranking on the ERA list
[Editor’s note] In order to keep the JQL to a manageable length, lower-ranked journals (ranking
3&4) of the UQ list were only added if they already featured in the JQL. The UQ list also in-
cluded some professional journals, but these were only ranked if they were already included in
the JQL.
Rank Interpretation
1 Highest quality rating, A* ERA
2 Intermediate quality rating, A ERA
3 Intermediate quality rating, B ERA
4 Lowest quality rating, C ERA
VHB 2011 —Assoc. ofProfessors ofBusiness in German speaking coun-
tries
A ranking developed on behalf of the Association of University Professors of Business in Ger-
man speaking countries (Verband der Hochschullehrer für Betriebswirtschaft - VHB). This ver-
sion (VHB-JOURQUAL 2.1) is an update of the second edition (2008). Rankings of journals on
the list were not updated, but new journals were added. For details about the update, see:
http://vhbonline.org/service/jourqual/vhb-jourqual-21-2011/
Details a about the procedures followed in the second edition (2008) are available here:
http://www.business-research.org/2009/2/01jourqual2/2166
There is an English-language article on the second edition of the VHB-JOURQUAL which is
published as: Schrader, U.; Hennig-Thurau, T. (2009) VHB-JOURQUAL2: Method, Results, and
Implications of the German Academic Association for Business Research's Journal Ranking,
BuR - Business Research, Official Open Access Journal of VHBVerband der Hochschullehrer
für Betriebswirtschaft e.V, Volume 2, Issue 2, December 2009, pp. 180-204.
[Editor’s note] In order to keep the JQL to a manageable length, lower-ranked journals (ranking
B-E) of the VHB list were only added if they already featured in the JQL. The same principle
was applied to German-language journals. The list also included a range of Engineering and
Computer Science as well as Health journals that were not included in the JQL as they were
seen as less relevant to Management/Business/Economics.
6. 6
Rank Interpretation
A+ VHB-JourQual Index 9
A VHB-JourQual Index 8
B VHB-JourQual Index 7
C VHB-JourQual Index 6
D VHB-JourQual Index 5
E VHB-JourQual Index < 5
AERES 2012 —Agence d’évaluation de la recherche etde l’enseignementsu-
périeur(17 Oct2012)
The AERES journal list has been constructed by the section 37 of the CNRS, in consultation
with academics from institutions such as CNRS, INRA and CNU. It has continuously evolved
over time. The 2012 update is a combination of the CNRS 2011 and FNEG 2011 list. Journals
ranked 1*, 1 or 2 on these lists were classified as A, journals ranked 3 as B, and journals ranked
4 as C. As such there is less differentiation in the highest rank than in other journal rankings
with more than a third of the ranked journals (20% of the journals on the list is unranked) in the
highest (A) category.
In order to be qualified as research active, academics generally have to publish at least three
items, including at least two articles in a five year period in journals on the AERES list if they
have a teaching & research contract and at least five items, including at least three articles in
five years if they have a research only contract.
[Editor’s note] In order to keep the JQL to a manageable length, lower-ranked journals (ranked
B, C or unranked) of the AERES 2012 list were only added if they already featured in the JQL.
Journals in Law, Agricultural/Energy Economics and Health that were not already included in
other lists in Business and Management were also excluded as were French journals. Similar to
many French rankings, the list seems to have a rather strong emphasis on Economics and
many of the journals in Management & Marketing are ranked much lower than on other lists.
Cra 2012 —Cranfield University SchoolofManagement
February 2012 (9th ed)
This list provides guidelines to staff on which journals they should consider submitting their pa-
pers to. It should be noted that the grading for each journal is the School’s view, and guided the
School’s submission to the RAE 2008. The projected grading has been produced using a large
number of internal and external sources, including journal impact factors.
[Editor’s note] If a journal of the Cranfield list was not already included in the JQL (which was
rare), it was only added if it had a score of 3 or 4.
Rank Interpretation
4 World leading
3 Top international
2 Lower international
1 National
EJL 2012 —Erasmus Research Institute ofManagementJournals Listing
The strategic purpose of the ERIM Journals List is to contribute to the quality of the scientific
output of ERIM and to the academic reputation of the institute (see http://www.erim.eur.nl/ejl).
The ERIM Journals List (EJL) helps to define the core domain of ERIM and provides direction
as to the type of publications that ERIM would like to produce. The practical purpose is to guar-
antee to the ERIM members and aspirant members that publications in the journals of the EJL
will qualify for membership. The EJL is believed to cover the whole field of research in manage-
7. 7
ment, as far as the ERIM research programs are concerned. This does not imply that no credit
will be given for publications in journals that are not on the EJL. It is impossible to make an ex-
haustive list of all the journals in the domain of research in management. The ERIM journal list
is based on judgment by peers and (ISI) impact scores.
The first edition of the list came out in 2002. In 2011 ERIM solicited proposals from each re-
search program for the fourth edition of the list. Five journals were upgraded to STAR, 12 jour-
nals were upgraded to P, and three journals were downgraded to S. Four new PA journals were
added and a new category (M*) was created. 31 S journals were removed from the list.
[Editor’s note] If a journal of the EJIM list was not already included in the JQL (which apart from
half a dozen Dutch journals was rare), it was only added if it had a score of STAR or P(A).
Rank Interpretation
STAR Top journals among P
P Best journals in the field
P A Top international journals (aspirant). By 1/1/2016 these journals will be trans-
ferred to the secondary list unless ISI with high impact has been attained
S Scientific refereed journals of a recognized academic reputation that do not
reach the quality levels of the Primary Set
M* Top managerial journal
ABDC 2013 —Australian Business Deans CouncilJournalRankings List
November2013
The ABDC Journal List is a collaborative list developed by the Australian Business Deans Coun-
cil that seeks to list journals relevant to Australian business academics and group these journals
into four quality categories ranging in descending order from:
Rank Interpretation
A* Best or leading journal in its field - publishes outstanding, original and rigorous
research that will shape the field. Acceptance rates are typically low and the edi-
torial board is dominated by leading scholars in the field or subfield, including
from top institutions in the world. Where relevant to the field or subfield, the jour-
nal has the highest impact factors or other indices of high reputation.
A Highly regarded journal in the field or subfield - publishes excellent research in
terms of originality, significance and rigour, has competitive submission and ac-
ceptance rates, excellent refereeing process and where relevant to the field or
subfield, has higher than average impact factors. Not all highly regarded journals
have high impact factors, especially those in niche areas.
B Well regarded journal in the field or subfield - publishes research of a good
standard in terms of originality, significance and rigour and papers are fully refer-
eed according to good standards and practices but acceptance rates are higher
than for Tiers A* and A. Depending on the field or sub-field, will have a modest
impact factor and will be ISI listed.
C A recognised journal - publishes research that is of a modest standard and/or is
yet to establish its reputation because of its newness. This tier is more inclusive
than the others but only includes refereed journals.
The 2010 ABDC Journal List has been developed after wide consultation across the sector and
stakeholders. The following organisations provided input into the process:
Australian Council of Professors and Heads of Information Systems (ACPHIS)
Accounting & Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand (AFAANZ)
Association of Industrial Relations of Australia and New Zealand (AIRAANZ)
Australia and New Zealand Academy of Management (ANZAM)
Australia and New Zealand Communication Association (ANZCA)
Australia and New Zealand International Business Academy (ANZIBA)
8. 8
Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy (ANZMAC)
Australian Society for the Study of Labour History (ASSLH)
Council of Law Deans (CLD)
Council for Australian University Tourism and Hospitality Education (CAUTHE)
Economics Society of Australia (ESA)
Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies (ITLS)
Public Relations Institute of Australia (PRIA)
Sport Management Association of Australia and New Zealand (SMAANZ)
Small Enterprise Association of Australia and New Zealand (SEAANZ)
Society of Organisational Behaviour Australia (SOBA
The 2013 revision followed a similarly comprehensive process, which was supported by public
submissions according to a standard template, (all available here:
http://www.abdc.edu.au/29.116.0.0.1.0.htm), qualitative and quantitative data assessment, pub-
lic exposure feedback and international expert consultation.
[Editor’s note] In order to keep the JQL to a manageable length, lower-ranked journals (ranking
B and C) of the ABDC list were only added if they already featured in the JQL. Also excluded
were journals in the area of law, education (unless related to Management), psychology (unless
related to OB), general social sciences (unless related to Management),statistics (unless related
to Economics or Management) and medicine.
FNEG 2013 —Foundation Nationalpourl’Enseignementde la Gestion des
Entreprises, version June 2013
A ranking created by the French Management Association to complement the CNRS list, which
is oriented more towards Science and Economics. The FNEGE Scientific Board includes all the
Academic Associations of Management representing the community of researchers in the field.
The list of scientific journals below is unanimously supported by the 14 scientific associations of
the discipline with the shared desire to obtain a categorization that reflects as accurately as pos-
sible the specificity of management as a science. This unanimous support from a whole scien-
tific community confers high legitimacy on it.
In creating the list, the Association combined peer review with reference to a wide range of
French and international journal rankings (all included in the JQL) as well as bibliometric indica-
tors (ISI Journal Impact Factor, Google Scholar h-index, SCImago SJR).
[Editor’s note] In order to keep the JQL to a manageable length, lower-ranked journals (2-4)
were only added if they already featured in the JQL. The same principle was applied to French-
language journals. Also excluded were journals in the area of health, politics, and medicine.]
Rank Interpretation
1* Most notable management journals with a prominent position (only 8 journals)
1 Most notable management journals, very selective and particularly recognized
in France and abroad
2 Highly selective journals with a very demanding peer review process
3 Very good journals with a good scientific reputation and significant contribu-
tions
4 Good journals with good selectivity and original contributions
CNRS 2014 —Centre Nationalde la Recherche Scientifique (www.cnrs.fr)
November2014 (version 4.03)
7th update of the ranking of journals in Economics and Business constructed by the French
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. The list of journals was constructed through con-
sultation with experts in the field, both in France and abroad. Directors of the various research
groups (and through them the researchers in these groups) were consulted in an iterative proc-
ess. Rankings of foreign universities were also consulted as well as listings such as SSCI and
EconLit. Only academic peer-reviewed journals were included in the list and hence it excludes
9. 9
high-ranked professional journals such as Harvard Business Review. Rankings are based on
several criteria: academic reputation, audience and impact. For more information and the full list
see: https://www.gate.cnrs.fr/IMG/pdf/Categorisation37_Nov2014-2-1.pdf
[Editor’s note] In order to keep the JQL to a manageable length, lower-ranked journals (ranking
2-4) of the CNRS list were only added if they already featured in the JQL. Journals in Law, Agri-
cultural/Energy Economics and Health that were not already included in other lists were also ex-
cluded, as were French journals.
Previous lists appeared to have a rather strong bias towards Economics and (to a lesser extent)
towards the more quantitative fields of Business (Finance & Accounting, IS and Operations Re-
search). This bias has been partially addressed in the new list. Many journals in Management &
Marketing were upgraded, whilst several journals in Finance & Accounting were downgraded.
Even so Management & Marketing still appears to be somewhat undervalued in comparison to
other ranking lists in the JQL.
Rank Interpretation
1* Highest quality rating (only 14 journals were given this ranking)
1
Intermediate quality ratings2
3
4 Lowest quality rating
Ess 2015 —ESSEC Business SchoolParis January 2015
ESSEC is one of the top French business schools. Its first journal ranking list was established
20 years ago. The current list is dated 21.01.2015. The ranking of a journal was decided by a
committee of seven ESSEC professors with outstanding performance in research. Factors con-
sidered are the aim and scope of the journal, the quality of its board, the SCCI impact factor, ex-
ternal opinions about the journal, quality of the papers, readership, scale of distribution in libra-
ries, journal lifetime, refereeing process, etc. Although it is based on a relatively small number of
key informants, the list was included to provide a French perspective on journal rankings.
[Editor’s note] In order to keep the JQL to a manageable length, lower-ranked journals (1-3)
were only added if they already featured in the JQL. Also excluded were journals in the area of
law, politics, mathematics, computing (unless related to OR), psychology (unless related to OB),
and medicine as well as most French journals. Several journals had to be excluded because
their titles were ambiguous and/or could not be found in public sources.]
Ran
k
Interpretation
0+ Recognised internationally as the best in the discipline
0 Excellence at a level close to the top journals in the field
1 High level scientific journals of international reputation and circulation
2 Generally national-circulation journals, or international journals of lesser reputation
3 Journals with a very narrow circulation or low profile.
ABS 2015 —Association ofBusiness Schools Academic JournalQuality
Guide February 2015
The first version of this list was published by Bristol Business School in June 2004, while the
second version appeared in 2005 as the Harvey Morris Business Journals List. The original list
stems from an analysis of where UK academics declared publications for the purposes of RAE
2001. Other journals were then added through comparison with other lists in circulation. Rank-
ings in these lists were standardized at this stage, bearing in mind the UK RAE 2008 classifica-
tion of research outputs as 4* (best work in the field), 3* (international excellence), 2* (interna-
tionally recognised) 1* (nationally recognised).
In converting the second edition of the HM List to the ABS list the editors followed a nine stage
procedure involving significant peer review and review of the quality standards, track records,
10. 10
contents and processes of each journal. For the 2nd (March 2008), 3rd edition (March 2009), 4th
edition (March 2010) and 5th edition (February 2015) a review panel of experts considered feed-
back from academic associations, publishers and individual academics. For further details see
the Introduction to the guide accessible here:
http://www.bizschooljournals.com/
[Editor’s note] In order to keep the JQL to a manageable length, lower-ranked journals (1 and 2)
were only added if they already featured in the JQL. Also excluded were journals in the area of
law, education (unless related to Management), psychology (unless related to OB), general so-
cial sciences (unless related to Management) and medicine.
Rank Interpretation
4* A world elite journal
4 A top journal
3 A highly regarded journal
2 A well regarded journal
1 A recognised journal
FinancialTimes Survey ofTop Business Schools 2006/2010
Journals used by the Financial Times to compile their lists of top Business Schools are marked
with an asterisk in the JQL and are listed below. Journals in bold were added in 2010. Journals
in brackets were removed in 2010.
Academy of Management Perspectives (Academy of Management/OUP)
Academy of Management Journal (Academy of Management, Ada, Ohio)
Academy of Management Review (Academy of Management)
Accounting, Organisations and Society (Elsevier)
Administrative Science Quarterly (Cornell University)
California Management Review (UC Berkeley)
Contemporary Accounting Research (Wiley)
Econometrica (Econometric Society, University of Chicago)
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (Baylor University, Waco, Texas)
Harvard Business Review (Harvard Business School Publishing)
Human Resource Management (John Wiley and Sons)
Information Systems Research (Informs)
[International Journal of Human Resource Management (Routledge)]
Journal of Accounting and Economics (Elsevier)
Journal of Accounting Research (University of Chicago)
Journal of Applied Psychology (American Psychological Association)
Journal of Business Venturing (Elsevier)
Journal of Consumer Research (University of Chicago)
Journal of Consumer Psychology (Elsevier)
Journal of Finance (Blackwell)
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
Journal of Financial Economics (Elsevier)
Journal of International Business Studies (Academy of International Business)
Journal of Management Studies (Wiley)
Journal of Marketing (American Marketing Association)
Journal of Marketing Research (American Marketing Association)
Journal of Operations Management (Elsevier)
Journal of Political Economy (University of Chicago)
Journal of the American Statistical Association (American Statistical Association)
[Management International Review (Gabler)]
Management Science (Informs)
Marketing Science (Informs)
MIS Quarterly (Mgmnt Information Systems Research Centre, University of Minnesota)
11. 11
Operations Research (Informs)
Organization Science (Informs)
Organization Studies (Sage)
Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes (Academic Press)
Production & Operations Management (POMS)
Quarterly Journal of Economics (MITPress)
Review of Accounting Studies (Springer)
Review of Financial Studies (Oxford University Press)
Sloan Management Review (MIT)
Strategic Management Journal (John Wiley and Sons)
The Accounting Review (American Accounting Association)
The American Economic Review (American Economic Association, Nashville)
The Journal of Business Ethics (Kluwer Academic)
The Rand Journal (The Rand Corporation)