This document outlines key language features to consider when writing an investigative report, including using clear language, precise words, an objective tone, credible sources, quotes, data, examples, hedging uncertain claims, a compelling headline, strong lead, background context, thesis statement, well-organized body with evidence and counterarguments, conclusion, and call to action. It also provides a sample headline and lead for a report about uncovering financial irregularities in city housing projects.

1. Language Features:
Clarity:
Use clear and concise language to convey complex information.
Avoid jargon and technical language that may confuse the audience.
Precision:
Be precise in your use of words to convey specific details.
Avoid vague or ambiguous language.
Objectivity:
Present information in a neutral and unbiased manner.
Avoid expressing personal opinions or emotions in the reporting.
Credible Sources:
Rely on credible and authoritative sources for information.
Attribute information to its source to enhance credibility.
Quotes and Interviews:
Include direct quotes from relevant sources to provide firsthand perspectives.
Conduct interviews with key stakeholders to gather additional insights.
Data and Statistics:
Incorporate relevant data and statistics to support your findings.
Present numerical information in a clear and understandable manner.
Anecdotes and Examples:
Use real-life examples and anecdotes to illustrate key points.
Humanize the story by including personal stories of those involved.
Hedging Language:
Use cautious language when uncertainties exist, making it clear what is known and what is
still being investigated.

2. Structural Features:
Headline:
Craft a compelling and informative headline that captures the essence of the investigation.
Lead:
Begin with a strong lead that grabs the reader's attention and provides a concise summary of
the investigation.
Background Information:
Provide necessary context and background information to help readers understand the
significance of the investigation.
Thesis Statement:
Clearly state the main purpose or thesis of the investigative piece early on.
Body:
Divide the body of the article into well-organized sections, each focusing on a specific aspect
of the investigation.
Use subheadings to guide readers through different parts of the story.
Evidence and Documentation:
Include detailed evidence and documentation to support your claims.
Attach relevant documents, images, or links when applicable.
Counterarguments:
Address potential counterarguments or alternative explanations to demonstrate thoroughness.
Conclusion:
Summarize key findings and their implications.
Invite readers to draw their conclusions based on the presented evidence.
Call to Action:
Urge readers to contact local representatives, demand an independent audit of city finances,
and participate in community forums to discuss solutions.
Sample:
Headline:
"Behind Closed Doors: Uncovering Financial Irregularities in City Housing Projects"
Lead:
In a groundbreaking investigation, our team delves into the shady financial dealings
surrounding major city housing projects, revealing a web of corruption that has gone
unnoticed for far too long.

3. Background Information:
City officials have long touted the success of housing initiatives aimed at addressing the
growing urban housing crisis. However, our investigation suggests that beneath the surface
lies a complex network of financial irregularities that demands public scrutiny.
Thesis Statement:
Our investigation aims to expose the mismanagement of funds allocated for city housing
projects, highlighting the need for accountability and transparency in urban development.
Body:
Section 1: The Financial Web Unraveled
Detailed examination of financial records obtained through Freedom of Information Act
requests exposes questionable transactions and unexplained budget discrepancies.
Section 2: Whistleblower Testimonies
Exclusive interviews with former city employees and contractors shed light on the culture of
silence and fear that has allowed these financial irregularities to persist.
Section 3: Dubious Contractor Dealings
Evidence points to collusion between city officials and specific contractors, leading to
inflated costs and substandard construction in housing projects.
Evidence and Documentation:
Include copies of financial documents, screenshots of emails, and transcripts of interviews.
Use graphs and charts to visually represent financial irregularities.
Counterarguments:
Address potential claims of misunderstanding or misinformation, providing solid evidence to
rebut alternative explanations.
Conclusion:
Our investigation calls for immediate action to hold those responsible accountable for their
actions. The residents of these housing projects deserve transparency and assurance that their
tax dollars are being used responsibly.
Call to Action:
Urge readers to contact local representatives, demand an independent audit of city finances,
and participate in community forums to discuss solutions.
References:
Cite all sources, including official documaents, interviews, and relevant legal or financial
regulations.