A first year law student's introduction to basic elements of the Australian adversarial legal system, and the principles of due process and access to justice.
Gloucester, VA Board of Supervisors Guilty of Willful Misconduct?Chuck Thompson
Reprint of our article over at Gloucester, Virginia Links and News website. We are not attorney;s and are simply asking questions based on our research of law and input from the Gloucester County Attorney, Ted Wilmot.
Emmanuel Roy alias EJR III coupable des cinq chefs d'accusations de fraudes e...GerardPradel
Emmanuel Roy alias EJR III a été reconnu coupable de cinq chefs d'accusations et condamne a sept mois de prison. Les crimes commis sont:
1. Complot pour commettre la fraude
2. Complot pour commettre la fraude électronique
3. Complot pour commettre la fraude bancaire
4. Fraude 1047 A Herkimer Street
5. Fraude 377 Quincy Street et Snedike Ave
Disclaimer: This Powerpoint presentation is created and owned by the user "Bo Yang Low". No one has the permission of distributing these slides and doing so may cause severe consequences.
Gloucester, VA Board of Supervisors Guilty of Willful Misconduct?Chuck Thompson
Reprint of our article over at Gloucester, Virginia Links and News website. We are not attorney;s and are simply asking questions based on our research of law and input from the Gloucester County Attorney, Ted Wilmot.
Emmanuel Roy alias EJR III coupable des cinq chefs d'accusations de fraudes e...GerardPradel
Emmanuel Roy alias EJR III a été reconnu coupable de cinq chefs d'accusations et condamne a sept mois de prison. Les crimes commis sont:
1. Complot pour commettre la fraude
2. Complot pour commettre la fraude électronique
3. Complot pour commettre la fraude bancaire
4. Fraude 1047 A Herkimer Street
5. Fraude 377 Quincy Street et Snedike Ave
Disclaimer: This Powerpoint presentation is created and owned by the user "Bo Yang Low". No one has the permission of distributing these slides and doing so may cause severe consequences.
Ad hoc Tribunals in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoud Zamani
Exploring the Enduring Impact of ICTY and ICTR on International Criminal Law
In this SlideShare presentation, delve into a comprehensive examination of the enduring legacies left by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) in the realm of international criminal law. Gain insights into their pivotal contributions, landmark cases, and their role in shaping the future of global justice
The principle of universal jurisdiction allows the national authorities of any state to investigate and prosecute people for serious international crimes even if they were committed in another country. For example, this means that the German government could, if it chose to do so, prosecute U.S. officials for crimes committed in Iraq and Afghanistan. - http://www.childabductioncourt.eu
Mark’s presentation sets out the current law on hate crime, the justice gap in how it is addressed in relation to different equality concerns, and the case for legal reform of hate crime law.
Comparative Criminal Justice
5th Edition
Chapter 1: Introduction
Adrianna Hughes
University of Scranton
Learning Objectives: Chapter 1Distinguish international criminal justice from comparative criminal justice
Describe the value of comparing systems and issues of criminal justice
Discuss globalization and its effects on crime and criminal justice
Explore how countries have adopted methods from other to change how they practice criminal justice
Describe the purpose of the historical- political approach
Comparative Criminal Justice Systems
5th Edition
Comparative Criminal JusticeInvestigates and evaluates a national system of justice in terms of other countries, cultures, or institutionsKey word: compareExamines strengths and weaknesses of different approaches to : crime, law, and justice around the world.Comparative criminology study of the causes and correlates of crime in two or more cultures.
Comparative Criminal Justice Systems
5th Edition
International & Transnational Crimes
InternationalCrimes against the peace and security of mankindBased on international agreements between countries, or legal precedentsEx’s: genocide, torture, and enslavement of population
TransnationalOffenses whose inception, acts, and impact involve more than one countryUsually involve provision of illicit goods or infiltration of business or government
Comparative Criminal Justice Systems
5th Edition
International & Transnational Crimes: Continued
InternationalThe International Criminal CourtFounded 2002; NetherlandsAdjudicates international crimesEx: President of Liberia: Charles TaylorAiding and abetting crimes
Transnational Occurring more frequently as global communication and interaction increase
Ex: guns used in criminal enterprises smuggled from Mexico to US- 2007-2011Counterfeit perfume sold in United States from China
See: Table 1.1 for most common transnational crimes
Comparative Criminal Justice Systems
5th Edition
International & Transnational Crimes: Continued
Comparative Criminal Justice Systems
5th Edition
Origins of Comparative Criminal JusticeApplies comparative methodologies used in law and political science to sociology and criminal justiceOrigins1700’s- “Age of Enlightenment”Cesare Beccaria- considered first criminologistCalled for changes in Western European criminal justiceSuch as elimination of torture, death penalty, and secret trials.
Comparative Criminal Justice Systems
5th Edition
Origins of Comparative Criminal Justice Continued1800’sOthers such as Jeremy Bentham and Emile Durkheim begin to conduct cross- national studies of crime
Criminal Justice Professionals start researching issue of cross-national crime
General Statistical Congress, International Congress on the Prevention and Repression of Crime, and First International Police Congress
First large scale attempts to collect data on international crime.
Comparative Criminal Justice Systems
...
C H A P T E R 11The Trial Process[T]here are principles.docxRAHUL126667
C H A P T E R 11
The Trial Process
[T]here are principles of liberty and justice, lying at the foundation of our civil and political
institutions, which no State can violate consistently with that due process of law required
by the Fourteenth Amendment in proceedings involving life, liberty, or property.
—JUSTICE JOHN MARSHALL HARLAN I, dissenting, Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516, 546 (1884)
479
CHAPTER OUTLINE
THE IDEAL OF THE FAIR TRIAL
Comparing Adversarial and Inquisitorial Trials
Steps in the Jury Trial
IMPORTANT CONSTITUTIONAL TRIAL
RIGHTS
The Right to Be Present
The Appearance of Fairness
Subpoena: The Right to Compulsory Process
Due Process and Access to Evidence
Right to Silence
Confrontation, Hearsay, and Cross-examination
Presumption of Innocence and Proof beyond a
Reasonable Doubt
THE JURY
Constitutional Requirements
Selecting an Unbiased Jury
Voir Dire and Fairness
LAW IN SOCIETY: JURY TRIALS AND
WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS
Convicting the Innocent
Why Trials Do Not Stop Wrongful Convictions
The Adversary Trial
SUMMARY
LEGAL PUZZLES
JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT: THE
TWENTY-FIRST-CENTURY COURT: SOUTER,
THOMAS, GINSBURG, BREYER, ROBERTS,
AND ALITO
David H. Souter
Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen G. Breyer
John G. Roberts Jr.
KEY TERMS
abuse of discretion
accusatorial trial
adversarial trial
adverse comment
bench trial
challenge for cause
character witness
compulsory process
Confrontation Clause
cross-examination
direct examination
dossier
dying declaration
expert witness
hearsay
hung jury
in camera
inquisitorial trial
invidious discrimination
jury deliberation
jury pool
jury trial
“key man” method
master jury list
peremptory challenge
petty crime
presumption of innocence
prima facie case
reasonable doubt
representative cross section
secret informants
venire
verdict
voir dire
waiver trial
Samuel A. Alito Jr.
M11_ZALM7613_06_SE_CH11.QXD 1/11/10 5:35 PM Page 479
R
O
D
D
Y
,
A
N
T
H
O
N
Y
I
S
A
A
C
3
7
2
7
B
U
THE IDEAL OF THE FAIR TRIAL
All cultures develop methods to ascertain the guilt of those accused of serious norm violations or
crimes. Even if offenders are caught “red-handed,” there is a human tendency to conduct formal
processes for declaring guilt. The trial therefore has two functions: first, to determine a suspect’s
guilt in a practical and efficient manner, and second, to provide a formal setting that solemnizes
the conclusion that this person is guilty and must be punished. The jury trial performs these
functions in the Anglo-American legal tradition.1 Trial by jury was not legislated into being all at
once as the best method to resolve criminal cases. Rather, it evolved over centuries in England.
As a result many have argued that it is not the most efficient or effective method of separating the
guilty from the innocent. Nevertheless, it is embedded in American culture and is guaranteed by
Article III and by the Sixth and Seventh Amendments of the U.S. Constitution, as well as ...
1-3 Short Paper Personality CharacteristicsPrepare a 1,000–.docxSONU61709
1-3 Short Paper: Personality Characteristics
Prepare a 1,000–1,750-word paper in which you discuss at least three of your personality characteristics. Using your life experiences, explain how these characteristics were developed. Such life experiences should include the following:
· Early development
· Family and social relationships
· Educational background
Assess how these characteristics have influenced your social and occupational choices.
C H A P T E R 11
The Trial Process
[T]here are principles of liberty and justice, lying at the foundation of our civil and political
institutions, which no State can violate consistently with that due process of law required
by the Fourteenth Amendment in proceedings involving life, liberty, or property.
—JUSTICE JOHN MARSHALL HARLAN I, dissenting, Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516, 546 (1884)
479
CHAPTER OUTLINE
THE IDEAL OF THE FAIR TRIAL
Comparing Adversarial and Inquisitorial Trials
Steps in the Jury Trial
IMPORTANT CONSTITUTIONAL TRIAL
RIGHTS
The Right to Be Present
The Appearance of Fairness
Subpoena: The Right to Compulsory Process
Due Process and Access to Evidence
Right to Silence
Confrontation, Hearsay, and Cross-examination
Presumption of Innocence and Proof beyond a
Reasonable Doubt
THE JURY
Constitutional Requirements
Selecting an Unbiased Jury
Voir Dire and Fairness
LAW IN SOCIETY: JURY TRIALS AND
WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS
Convicting the Innocent
Why Trials Do Not Stop Wrongful Convictions
The Adversary Trial
SUMMARY
LEGAL PUZZLES
JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT: THE
TWENTY-FIRST-CENTURY COURT: SOUTER,
THOMAS, GINSBURG, BREYER, ROBERTS,
AND ALITO
David H. Souter
Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen G. Breyer
John G. Roberts Jr.
KEY TERMS
abuse of discretion
accusatorial trial
adversarial trial
adverse comment
bench trial
challenge for cause
character witness
compulsory process
Confrontation Clause
cross-examination
direct examination
dossier
dying declaration
expert witness
hearsay
hung jury
in camera
inquisitorial trial
invidious discrimination
jury deliberation
jury pool
jury trial
“key man” method
master jury list
peremptory challenge
petty crime
presumption of innocence
prima facie case
reasonable doubt
representative cross section
secret informants
venire
verdict
voir dire
waiver trial
Samuel A. Alito Jr.
M11_ZALM7613_06_SE_CH11.QXD 1/11/10 5:35 PM Page 479
R
O
D
D
Y
,
A
N
T
H
O
N
Y
I
S
A
A
C
3
7
2
7
B
U
THE IDEAL OF THE FAIR TRIAL
All cultures develop methods to ascertain the guilt of those accused of serious norm violations or
crimes. Even if offenders are caught “red-handed,” there is a human tendency to conduct formal
processes for declaring guilt. The trial therefore has two functions: first, to determine a suspect’s
guilt in a practical and efficient manner, and second, to provide a formal setting that solemnizes
the conclusion that this person is guilty and must be punished. The jury trial performs these
functions in the Anglo-Amer ...
Meeting the changing demands of legal educationKate Galloway
Overview of the Smart Casual project, building professional development modules for sessional law teachers - as presented at the Chinese University of Hong Kong legal education conference, June 2016.
The Smart Casual project includes resources on how to teach law students to 'think like a lawyer'. This presentation canvasses some of the challenges in teaching these complex skills, and some solutions.
More Related Content
Similar to Introduction to due process and the adversarial system
Ad hoc Tribunals in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoud Zamani
Exploring the Enduring Impact of ICTY and ICTR on International Criminal Law
In this SlideShare presentation, delve into a comprehensive examination of the enduring legacies left by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) in the realm of international criminal law. Gain insights into their pivotal contributions, landmark cases, and their role in shaping the future of global justice
The principle of universal jurisdiction allows the national authorities of any state to investigate and prosecute people for serious international crimes even if they were committed in another country. For example, this means that the German government could, if it chose to do so, prosecute U.S. officials for crimes committed in Iraq and Afghanistan. - http://www.childabductioncourt.eu
Mark’s presentation sets out the current law on hate crime, the justice gap in how it is addressed in relation to different equality concerns, and the case for legal reform of hate crime law.
Comparative Criminal Justice
5th Edition
Chapter 1: Introduction
Adrianna Hughes
University of Scranton
Learning Objectives: Chapter 1Distinguish international criminal justice from comparative criminal justice
Describe the value of comparing systems and issues of criminal justice
Discuss globalization and its effects on crime and criminal justice
Explore how countries have adopted methods from other to change how they practice criminal justice
Describe the purpose of the historical- political approach
Comparative Criminal Justice Systems
5th Edition
Comparative Criminal JusticeInvestigates and evaluates a national system of justice in terms of other countries, cultures, or institutionsKey word: compareExamines strengths and weaknesses of different approaches to : crime, law, and justice around the world.Comparative criminology study of the causes and correlates of crime in two or more cultures.
Comparative Criminal Justice Systems
5th Edition
International & Transnational Crimes
InternationalCrimes against the peace and security of mankindBased on international agreements between countries, or legal precedentsEx’s: genocide, torture, and enslavement of population
TransnationalOffenses whose inception, acts, and impact involve more than one countryUsually involve provision of illicit goods or infiltration of business or government
Comparative Criminal Justice Systems
5th Edition
International & Transnational Crimes: Continued
InternationalThe International Criminal CourtFounded 2002; NetherlandsAdjudicates international crimesEx: President of Liberia: Charles TaylorAiding and abetting crimes
Transnational Occurring more frequently as global communication and interaction increase
Ex: guns used in criminal enterprises smuggled from Mexico to US- 2007-2011Counterfeit perfume sold in United States from China
See: Table 1.1 for most common transnational crimes
Comparative Criminal Justice Systems
5th Edition
International & Transnational Crimes: Continued
Comparative Criminal Justice Systems
5th Edition
Origins of Comparative Criminal JusticeApplies comparative methodologies used in law and political science to sociology and criminal justiceOrigins1700’s- “Age of Enlightenment”Cesare Beccaria- considered first criminologistCalled for changes in Western European criminal justiceSuch as elimination of torture, death penalty, and secret trials.
Comparative Criminal Justice Systems
5th Edition
Origins of Comparative Criminal Justice Continued1800’sOthers such as Jeremy Bentham and Emile Durkheim begin to conduct cross- national studies of crime
Criminal Justice Professionals start researching issue of cross-national crime
General Statistical Congress, International Congress on the Prevention and Repression of Crime, and First International Police Congress
First large scale attempts to collect data on international crime.
Comparative Criminal Justice Systems
...
C H A P T E R 11The Trial Process[T]here are principles.docxRAHUL126667
C H A P T E R 11
The Trial Process
[T]here are principles of liberty and justice, lying at the foundation of our civil and political
institutions, which no State can violate consistently with that due process of law required
by the Fourteenth Amendment in proceedings involving life, liberty, or property.
—JUSTICE JOHN MARSHALL HARLAN I, dissenting, Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516, 546 (1884)
479
CHAPTER OUTLINE
THE IDEAL OF THE FAIR TRIAL
Comparing Adversarial and Inquisitorial Trials
Steps in the Jury Trial
IMPORTANT CONSTITUTIONAL TRIAL
RIGHTS
The Right to Be Present
The Appearance of Fairness
Subpoena: The Right to Compulsory Process
Due Process and Access to Evidence
Right to Silence
Confrontation, Hearsay, and Cross-examination
Presumption of Innocence and Proof beyond a
Reasonable Doubt
THE JURY
Constitutional Requirements
Selecting an Unbiased Jury
Voir Dire and Fairness
LAW IN SOCIETY: JURY TRIALS AND
WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS
Convicting the Innocent
Why Trials Do Not Stop Wrongful Convictions
The Adversary Trial
SUMMARY
LEGAL PUZZLES
JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT: THE
TWENTY-FIRST-CENTURY COURT: SOUTER,
THOMAS, GINSBURG, BREYER, ROBERTS,
AND ALITO
David H. Souter
Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen G. Breyer
John G. Roberts Jr.
KEY TERMS
abuse of discretion
accusatorial trial
adversarial trial
adverse comment
bench trial
challenge for cause
character witness
compulsory process
Confrontation Clause
cross-examination
direct examination
dossier
dying declaration
expert witness
hearsay
hung jury
in camera
inquisitorial trial
invidious discrimination
jury deliberation
jury pool
jury trial
“key man” method
master jury list
peremptory challenge
petty crime
presumption of innocence
prima facie case
reasonable doubt
representative cross section
secret informants
venire
verdict
voir dire
waiver trial
Samuel A. Alito Jr.
M11_ZALM7613_06_SE_CH11.QXD 1/11/10 5:35 PM Page 479
R
O
D
D
Y
,
A
N
T
H
O
N
Y
I
S
A
A
C
3
7
2
7
B
U
THE IDEAL OF THE FAIR TRIAL
All cultures develop methods to ascertain the guilt of those accused of serious norm violations or
crimes. Even if offenders are caught “red-handed,” there is a human tendency to conduct formal
processes for declaring guilt. The trial therefore has two functions: first, to determine a suspect’s
guilt in a practical and efficient manner, and second, to provide a formal setting that solemnizes
the conclusion that this person is guilty and must be punished. The jury trial performs these
functions in the Anglo-American legal tradition.1 Trial by jury was not legislated into being all at
once as the best method to resolve criminal cases. Rather, it evolved over centuries in England.
As a result many have argued that it is not the most efficient or effective method of separating the
guilty from the innocent. Nevertheless, it is embedded in American culture and is guaranteed by
Article III and by the Sixth and Seventh Amendments of the U.S. Constitution, as well as ...
1-3 Short Paper Personality CharacteristicsPrepare a 1,000–.docxSONU61709
1-3 Short Paper: Personality Characteristics
Prepare a 1,000–1,750-word paper in which you discuss at least three of your personality characteristics. Using your life experiences, explain how these characteristics were developed. Such life experiences should include the following:
· Early development
· Family and social relationships
· Educational background
Assess how these characteristics have influenced your social and occupational choices.
C H A P T E R 11
The Trial Process
[T]here are principles of liberty and justice, lying at the foundation of our civil and political
institutions, which no State can violate consistently with that due process of law required
by the Fourteenth Amendment in proceedings involving life, liberty, or property.
—JUSTICE JOHN MARSHALL HARLAN I, dissenting, Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516, 546 (1884)
479
CHAPTER OUTLINE
THE IDEAL OF THE FAIR TRIAL
Comparing Adversarial and Inquisitorial Trials
Steps in the Jury Trial
IMPORTANT CONSTITUTIONAL TRIAL
RIGHTS
The Right to Be Present
The Appearance of Fairness
Subpoena: The Right to Compulsory Process
Due Process and Access to Evidence
Right to Silence
Confrontation, Hearsay, and Cross-examination
Presumption of Innocence and Proof beyond a
Reasonable Doubt
THE JURY
Constitutional Requirements
Selecting an Unbiased Jury
Voir Dire and Fairness
LAW IN SOCIETY: JURY TRIALS AND
WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS
Convicting the Innocent
Why Trials Do Not Stop Wrongful Convictions
The Adversary Trial
SUMMARY
LEGAL PUZZLES
JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT: THE
TWENTY-FIRST-CENTURY COURT: SOUTER,
THOMAS, GINSBURG, BREYER, ROBERTS,
AND ALITO
David H. Souter
Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen G. Breyer
John G. Roberts Jr.
KEY TERMS
abuse of discretion
accusatorial trial
adversarial trial
adverse comment
bench trial
challenge for cause
character witness
compulsory process
Confrontation Clause
cross-examination
direct examination
dossier
dying declaration
expert witness
hearsay
hung jury
in camera
inquisitorial trial
invidious discrimination
jury deliberation
jury pool
jury trial
“key man” method
master jury list
peremptory challenge
petty crime
presumption of innocence
prima facie case
reasonable doubt
representative cross section
secret informants
venire
verdict
voir dire
waiver trial
Samuel A. Alito Jr.
M11_ZALM7613_06_SE_CH11.QXD 1/11/10 5:35 PM Page 479
R
O
D
D
Y
,
A
N
T
H
O
N
Y
I
S
A
A
C
3
7
2
7
B
U
THE IDEAL OF THE FAIR TRIAL
All cultures develop methods to ascertain the guilt of those accused of serious norm violations or
crimes. Even if offenders are caught “red-handed,” there is a human tendency to conduct formal
processes for declaring guilt. The trial therefore has two functions: first, to determine a suspect’s
guilt in a practical and efficient manner, and second, to provide a formal setting that solemnizes
the conclusion that this person is guilty and must be punished. The jury trial performs these
functions in the Anglo-Amer ...
Similar to Introduction to due process and the adversarial system (20)
Meeting the changing demands of legal educationKate Galloway
Overview of the Smart Casual project, building professional development modules for sessional law teachers - as presented at the Chinese University of Hong Kong legal education conference, June 2016.
The Smart Casual project includes resources on how to teach law students to 'think like a lawyer'. This presentation canvasses some of the challenges in teaching these complex skills, and some solutions.
Distributive Justice and Gender in Intimate Relationships: A Relational ApproachKate Galloway
In 'performing property' the common law courts enact a market based, transactional understanding of property distribution. This approach is ill-suited to ascertaining distribution within a marriage (or marriage-like) relationship. This paper suggests ways of contesting such claims to property, applying a relational approach to intention as to property distribution.
Tenure in North Queensland: The Autonomy MythKate Galloway
For Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities in North Queensland, the discourse around tenure promises economic growth and opportunity for autonomy. However these claims occur within neoliberal discourse that privileges the individualism of private property as the sole determinant of value. Claims of autonomy in ‘secure and tradeable’ tenure ignore the real mechanisms by which land has been marketised. An idealised or ideological understanding of land and development ignores diverse values of land with two implications. Tenure changes are unlikely to yield the desired economic outcomes; and they will likely perpetuate the historical colonialism of the north.
Presentation for the 2015 TASA Conference, JCU, Cairns
A Lawyering Approach to Teaching StatutesKate Galloway
Judicial concern with the adequacy of statutory interpretation education in law school has been persistent. In some discipline areas such as property law, the nature of the problem has been slightly puzzling for some in light of the inevitability of working with statutes in a statute-based subject. This presentation articulates what may be a differential experience with ‘statutory interpretation’ from the standpoints of judging and lawyering. Further, it asks whether the well-described focus in legal education on the appellate adjudicative process has contributed to the apparent lack of graduates’ experience in ‘statutory interpretation’. This presentation suggests that teaching ‘statutory interpretation’ needs to encompass both a judicial and a lawyering approach to statutes, and presents for discussion teaching approaches that emphasise the role and application of statutes in a transactional context.
Teaching Social Justice through Statutory InterpretationKate Galloway
The contemporary dialogue surrounding statutory interpretation in Australian legal education has tended to focus on the adjudicative experience. Much of the literature on the discrete subject of statutory interpretation is written by experts in public law and by judges. There is however a much wider experience of working with statutes, including the daily practice of transactional lawyers and the application of statutory provisions in contexts that are unlikely ever to see judicial interpretation. In the latter case, it is often by parliamentary design that rights, obligations, and processes for dispute resolution are provided for explicitly outside the context of courts of record. Usually the purpose of such statutes is to promote access to justice. Legislation of this type is therefore a rich context for student learning about the need for and processes of access to justice. Because clues to interpretation, to resolution of ambiguity, or to the meaning of terms cannot be found in the courts, the question for the legal educator becomes how best to teach the reading of a statute outside express judicial guidance through precedent. This paper uses the example of property law to illustrate a statutory interpretation framework within which to use statutes to reveal issues of power, and to understand the operation of legislative responses that promote access to justice.
This presentation covers the history of land dealings from old system, through deeds registration, to Torrens title. It outlines the problems with the old system, and how Torrens has created a better, more sustainable system of land dealings. It deals with the Queensland jurisdiction.
Institutions of International Law: An Australian PerspectiveKate Galloway
Drawing on existing knowledge about legal institutions and processes, this presentation provides an overview of the origin and nature of international law and its institutions and processes of governance. It highlights the relationship between international law and Australian domestic law, through the concept of sovereignty and also Australian processes for incorporating international law domestically.
This presentation looks beyond the principal institutions of the three arms of government, canvassing the role of other actors within the system of governance in general and the legal system in particular. It covers the structure of the legal profession - the roles of solicitors and barristers - and their regulation. Royal commissions and law reform commissions provide a contrast to the courts and parliament, and serve a particular purpose in the administration of justice. The Attorney-General oversees an extensive portfolio of justice-related departments and institutions, including the DPP. Finally we ask: does the media play a role in good governance?
Parliament: Australian Representative DemocracyKate Galloway
An overview of the institution and processes of the Australian parliament, featuring the Commonwealth and Queensland to illustrate and question its representative nature.
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
9. Civil trial process
P outlines
case
Examination
in chief
Cross-
examination
Re-
examination
Summing up
Standard of
proof: BoP
Decision Remedies
9
10. Civil vs criminal trial process
Civil Criminal
Straight to hearing – may require
mediation first
Committal hearing before trial
Plaintiff Prosecution
Calls witnesses Innocent til proven guilty: does not
need to call own witnesses
Jury trial rare Indictable offences: jury trial
Prove on balance of probabilities Prove beyond reasonable doubt
Judge makes finding Further submissions re sentencing
10
17. Universal Declaration Human
Rights
Article 10
everyone is entitled to a fair and public
hearing by an independent and
impartial tribunal, in the determination of
his rights and of any criminal charge
against him
17
23. Rubin Carter, 1967 (US)
23
All of Rubin's cards were marked in
advance
The trial was a pig-circus, he never
had a chance.
The judge made Rubin's witnesses
drunkards from the slums
To the white folks who watched he
was a revolutionary bum
And to the black folks he was just a
crazy nigger.
No one doubted that he pulled the
trigger.
And though they could not produce
the gun,
The D.A. said he was the one who
did the deed
And the all-white jury agreed.
Bob Dylan ‘Hurricane’ (1975)
Image:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304
24. 24
Jury Act 1995 (Qld)
s59 Verdict in criminal cases for particular offences must be unanimous
(1) This section applies to the following criminal trials on indictment—
(a) a trial for any of the following offences— (i) murder; (ii) an offence against the
Criminal Code, section 54A(1) if, because of the circumstances of the offence, the
offender is liable to imprisonment for life, which can not be mitigated or varied under
the Criminal Code or any other law; (iii) an offence against a law of the
Commonwealth;
(b) a trial before a jury consisting of only 10 jurors when it gives its verdict.
(2) For subsection (1)(b), it does not matter that at any time before its
verdict was given the jury consisted of more than 10 jurors.
(3) The verdict of the jury must be unanimous.
(4) However, if on the trial of an offence mentioned in subsection
(1)(a)(i) or (ii)—
(a)the jury is unable to reach a unanimous verdict; and
(b)the defendant is liable to be convicted of another offence not
mentioned in subsection (1)(a)(i) or (ii);
in relation to the conviction for the other offence, section 59A applies as
if the defendant were originally charged with the other offence.
27. Access to justice: layers of
cost
27
Party bears cost:
Time, lost wages
Legal representation
Court fees
Other party’s costs
28. The law in its
majestic equality
forbids the rich as
well as the poor to
sleep under the
bridges, to beg in
the streets, and to
steal bread.
Anatole France28
Image from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahboba%27s_Promise
31. Sexual
violence
since 15
Assault in
home
Violence by
partner
Not reporting
assault to
police
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Experiences of violence (2014, Parliamentary
Library)
Women
Men
31
Domestic violence hotline: 1800 811 811 http://www.dvconnect.org/education-resources/public-
awareness-campaigns/
32. Hindmarsh Island Bridge Case
Q. Which is what you are talking about, is a
question of protecting the island from a lot of
people coming to the island and ruining it.
That’s what it is isn’t it?
A. You interpret it as environment, I don’t. We
have a different interpretation it seems. We
cannot as Aboriginal people, separate
environment and culture. They go hand in
hand.
Q. Why are they different from —
A. Because — no, I can’t talk to you about
that. It is plain to see you would never
understand about that anyway.
32