Search engine dependency
 and its influence on data
           quality
                                    By Ronan CHARDONNEAU

 Intermediate report presentation –
        Final Master Thesis


     European Master in Business Studies 2007/2009
Table of contents

      • Structure of the thesis
  • Summary of selected chapters
• Further research and proceeding
                 plan
            • Conclusion
Structure
Chapter 1: Introduction of the topic background;
Chapter 2: Concept of data quality;
Chapter 3: Search engines dependency;
  – Search engine market configuration;
  – Search engines dependency aspect;
  – Search engines dependency problems;
Chapter 4: Risks of search engines dependency and its
                  influence on data quality;
  – Measuring the problematic and trying to answer it;
Chapter 5: The Google example;
  – Emphazing the report on Google
Chapter 1: Introduction
• Internet is everyday getting bigger and
  bigger;
• We are using more and more Internet to
  find information;
• Search engines are until now the best way
  to crawl the web;
• Search engine dependency is quite
  relevant;
Chapter 2: Data quality
• I have no results;
• I expect to have some results;
• I expect to have some results which fit my
  expectations;
• I expect to have some results that I can use
  afterward;
• I expect to have some results that I can re -
  use afterward;
Chapter 3: Search engine
           dependency
• 3 different categories of search engine;
• 1 leader (Google), 1 follower (Yahoo), 2
  champions (MS & Baidu) and very few local
  heroes;
• 1 winner/country, no revolution since 1998;
• SED phenomenon 3 categories
• Cons of addiction (one can think that the
  information does not exist, Privacy,
  disappearance, awareness about others
  SE, bad addiction);
Chapter 4: Topic
• Search engine dependency is proved;
• Search engines are using different
  technology and are not browsing the
  Internet at the same place;
• How to browse the Web properly;
• Measurement of the gap of information;
Chapter 5: The Google example
• An anglo-Saxon phenomenon (West vs
  East);
• Blogger, Gmail, Adsense, Google News...
• Banalization of Google;
• Google success weakness;
• Google sub search engines;
Further research and proceeding
              plan
• Chapter 4: the measurement of the gap
  information; (3 weeks of work)
• Coming back on Chapter 5 and make it
  better;
• Rewriting the report in an impersonal way;
Milestones
                   Measurements Ch.4 Finishing the thesis




       60~70%                            10~20%
                      20%


June              January End of                        June
2008               2009 February                        2009
                          2009
Conclusion
• On time;
• No particular stress for the coming events;
• A final thesis which until so far gave me
  great opportunities to learn and to do
  something I am really enjoying;
• Still some work to go on but quite
  unsignificant regarding all the work I did so
  far;
Thank you for your attention

Intermediate Report Presentation Example

  • 1.
    Search engine dependency and its influence on data quality By Ronan CHARDONNEAU Intermediate report presentation – Final Master Thesis European Master in Business Studies 2007/2009
  • 2.
    Table of contents • Structure of the thesis • Summary of selected chapters • Further research and proceeding plan • Conclusion
  • 3.
    Structure Chapter 1: Introductionof the topic background; Chapter 2: Concept of data quality; Chapter 3: Search engines dependency; – Search engine market configuration; – Search engines dependency aspect; – Search engines dependency problems; Chapter 4: Risks of search engines dependency and its influence on data quality; – Measuring the problematic and trying to answer it; Chapter 5: The Google example; – Emphazing the report on Google
  • 4.
    Chapter 1: Introduction •Internet is everyday getting bigger and bigger; • We are using more and more Internet to find information; • Search engines are until now the best way to crawl the web; • Search engine dependency is quite relevant;
  • 5.
    Chapter 2: Dataquality • I have no results; • I expect to have some results; • I expect to have some results which fit my expectations; • I expect to have some results that I can use afterward; • I expect to have some results that I can re - use afterward;
  • 6.
    Chapter 3: Searchengine dependency • 3 different categories of search engine; • 1 leader (Google), 1 follower (Yahoo), 2 champions (MS & Baidu) and very few local heroes; • 1 winner/country, no revolution since 1998; • SED phenomenon 3 categories • Cons of addiction (one can think that the information does not exist, Privacy, disappearance, awareness about others SE, bad addiction);
  • 7.
    Chapter 4: Topic •Search engine dependency is proved; • Search engines are using different technology and are not browsing the Internet at the same place; • How to browse the Web properly; • Measurement of the gap of information;
  • 8.
    Chapter 5: TheGoogle example • An anglo-Saxon phenomenon (West vs East); • Blogger, Gmail, Adsense, Google News... • Banalization of Google; • Google success weakness; • Google sub search engines;
  • 9.
    Further research andproceeding plan • Chapter 4: the measurement of the gap information; (3 weeks of work) • Coming back on Chapter 5 and make it better; • Rewriting the report in an impersonal way;
  • 10.
    Milestones Measurements Ch.4 Finishing the thesis 60~70% 10~20% 20% June January End of June 2008 2009 February 2009 2009
  • 11.
    Conclusion • On time; •No particular stress for the coming events; • A final thesis which until so far gave me great opportunities to learn and to do something I am really enjoying; • Still some work to go on but quite unsignificant regarding all the work I did so far;
  • 12.
    Thank you foryour attention