1. 24 January 2018
Prepared for Midlands Intelligent Mobility Conference
Inclusive design for mobility.
Considering the needs
of older users
2. 1. Intelligent mobility
2. Some macro trends around older users
3. A survey we conducted of older travellers in the UK
1. Transport modes used
2. Current challenges faced
4. Solve for older users, fix for disability - does this work?
5. Designing mobility solutions with universal benefits
Contents
3. open inclusion
@openforaccess
We provide:
• User insights from disabled & older people
• Authentic and expert audits
• Innovation and universal design thinking
• Inclusion solutions, tools and training
• Governance support and value analysis
Open Inclusion
an accessibility and innovation consultancy
4. We identify and remove hurdles between
customer and product or service providers
so that both can achieve to the
fullest of their ambitions.
Open’s essence
5. We have a user panel of +350 people who
- Have sensory impairments
- Have mobility/dexterity impairments
- Are cognitively diverse
- Have complex (mixed) conditions
- Are over 65 years old
We do mainly qualitative user research, both
behavioral and attitudinal. In physical, digital
and hybrid environments.
Guidelines are not sufficient guides
Ask your users. Gain real insights
Authentic insight
9. 4 macro trends that make designing for older users very relevant
10. % of the UK population over 65 years old % of the UK population over 85 years old
Source: ONS 2017
1/ We are getting older as a society
11. 2/ Older people are increasingly choosing to live in rural areas
12. Source: FRS 2015/16
Percentage of each age category who have at least one impairment that would be classed as a disability (EA)
By gender and age
3/ As we age we incur impairments at an increasing rate
13. 4/ Technology is making adaptive solutions more pervasive,
cheaper and easier
14. We ran an online survey from our panel
Survey conducted: January 2018
Participants: n = 16
Ages: 66 to 92
Based across the UK
Rural/village, town and urban
If in doubt - ask
How do older people travel? What do they want?
16. Modes of transport
75% Driven by friends/family
63% Caught a local train
63% Walk (<1 mile)
56% Urban bus
56% Regional train
56% Taxi
50% Drive own car
44% Regional / national bus
44% Underground
25% Walk (>1 mile)
How do older people travel? What modes do they use?
17. People age very differently -
confidence, social interactions, attitudes
and ability to see, hear, think, react etc.
Older people are not a single
demographic group
18. Participant 2
Most frequent to least
1. am driven by family
2. regional train
3. public urban bus
4. local train
5. regional bus
6. private hire vehicle
7. taxi
Participant 1
Most frequent to least
1. walk (< 1 mile)
2. cycle
3. walk (>1 mile)
4. public bus
5. local train
6. regional train
7. London underground
8. aeroplane
When arranging transport modes by regularity
There were major usage differences
across the surveyed group
19. Public transport - current barriers Category
Cannot walk to public transport Mobility
Putting mobility scooter on public transport. Mobility
Lack of buses locally and non lowered curbs. Mobility
The train station is 1.5 miles away and Victorian, so I
cannot get across to the other platform. There is no lift. Mobility
High step or gap to get on train or coach Mobility
Railway stations that have stairs and no lift. Mobility
Pushchairs who cannot or will not fold for me to access
the wheelchair bay Mobility
Buses are overcrowded. Standing involves risk of falling Mobility
Holding on when moving Mobility
20. Public transport - current barriers Category
Limited car parking Multiple
Taxis refusing assistance dogs Multiple
It is increasingly difficult to press the correct buttons to
purchase a ticket from a machine due to my hand
tremor. I prefer to buy tickets from station staff, if
available Dexterity
Announcements in audible form Hearing
Read bus numbers from a distance Vision
Identification of the bus route numbers Vision
Finding the right bus or train at a stop or station
Vision/
Cognitive
Access barriers older travellers face
Public transport - sensory, dexterity, cognitive
21. Private transport - current barriers Category
Getting walker/scooter out of car because of weight. Mobility
My left leg does not bend much, so any car has to have
wide opening doors and needs to be high, for me to get
in and out. Mobility
Some cars are too high or low to get into or out of, need
to open door fully to get in and out.
Some parking spaces are too narrow. Mobility
Accessible parking and space at the side of car to get
out. Some accessible spaces do not have the hash
markings on both sides. Also some on road parking not
having enough room to open tailgate to get scooter in
and out. Mobility
No disabled bay or all bays already filled. Mobility
Cannot take static chair in car so only accept lift if close
enough to walk Mobility
22. Private transport - current barriers Category
When they [taxi company] calls me on my mobile Hearing
Shutting the door and putting my seatbelt on Dexterity
Access barriers older travellers face
Private - hearing and dexterity
23. Walking or cycling - current barriers Category
Increasing immobility as hip and knee joints
stiffen and become painful when walking. Mobility
Pain, unable to walk more than a few metres, I
use a rollator around the house as I hate to
think I might be stuck in the chair forever. Mobility/ Pain
Pain, and stiffness of my joints walking
especially on uneven ground, gravel etc. Mobility/ Pain
Uneven pavements Mobility
Shared space, overgrown hedges, general
clutter such as street furniture Mobility
Obstacles such as cars on pavements, wheely
bins etc Mobility
Access barriers older travellers face
Walking and cycling - mobility
24. Access to friends/family, shops, work (paid and voluntary), healthcare providers,
entertainment and other daily living needs that provides:
• Independence
• Safety
• Communication and physical design adapted to their needs
• Time efficiency (duration, regularity and reliability)
• Cost efficiency
Not too many new things to learn. Simplicity or consistency.
Although “discovering” new challenges and technologies can be a pleasure too.
What older users want
26. We spend a lot of time designing the bridge, but not enough
time thinking about the people who are crossing it”
Dr. Prabhjot Singh
Director of Systems Design
Earth Institute
“
These challenges provide the seeds for innovation and
great inclusive design
27. Therefore solving for older travellers needs requires good inclusive design that will
also support the needs of younger people with a disability or temporary access
needs
Older people have a higher propensity to incur impairments and co-morbidities
• mobility / dexterity
• hearing
• sight
• memory
• other cognitive decline
Good solutions for older transport users, may by default
solve access needs for disabled passengers
28. Older people with access needs
Identify as “just getting older”
May adapt slowly working around the
access need rather than directly
addressing it
Use adaptive technology and simple
universal design “hacks”
Younger people with access needs
Identify as disabled or Deaf or CP etc
Are more likely to directly address the
access need. e.g. get a hearing aid,
learn braille, BSL, use advanced
assistive technology
Become part of a community of people
with similar access needs
A few main difference exist between older and younger
people with access needs
29. Greater digital adoption and skills
Have higher education levels
Question and challenge more
Are working later in life
Greater economic resources
Higher service expectations
Travel more and more adventurously
Have better overall health for longer
Are living longer
The “new” old
30. Good insight: user research, measures and analysis
Effective government policy: leading to budget decisions, standards and legislation
Good public infrastructure
Simple, effective design principles
So what is needed - the broader framework
31. Design for ease of learning
Consider ease of use including access, egress and in motion
Consider full needs of end-to-end solutions
Use real-time data such as seat availability and schedules to reduce uncertainty
Provide multi-modal communication
Create / maintain urban spaces that are safe people who have reduced mobility
Design solutions that cater for multiple co-existing impairments
Recognise emotional as well as functional needs
So what does this mean for inclusive design principles
for creators of smart mobility solutions?
32. “When we design for disability first, we often stumble upon solutions that are
not only inclusive but also are often better than when we design for the
Elise Roy
US Attorney and inclusive design advocate
“
Understanding and designing for the needs older and
disabled users will catalyse more innovative solutions
How intelligent mobility could overcome or create transport related challenges for older people and those with disabilities
This image is a German tricycle especially adapted for older cyclists
Hi I am Christine.
I am the Founder and Managing Director of Open Inclusion
We are a business that specialises in:
- identifying gaps that exclude or frustrate a proportion of customers or employees
designing or improving products, services and environments to ensure that there are as few barriers as possible
We do this through user testing, audits, inclusive design including co-creation, technical solutions, business tools, role-based training and skills and executive management support
Essentially , we …
Our “killer app” or unfair and unreplacable competitive advantage is our user panel.
We have a panel of over 350 people across the UK who are older, have impairments or are “just getting older”
This panel has been carefully built up over nearly 2 decades to reflect a very broad range of demographics, attitudes, backgrounds, adaption approaches and of course impairments both in type & severity.
It predates our business as we acquired it 2 years ago
I will share some insights from a transport survey we conducted with members of our panel who are over 65 shortly
Thankfully, with a panel like ours I don’t need to be an expert, I just need to be an expert at asking others, listening to what they tell me and spotting the interesting bits and patterns.
Cool, environmentally friendly, healthy and fun
Doc from Back to the Future 2 - with his Huvr Board created in 1989 and supposedly available for teenagers to chase each other down the streets in the world of 2015
Dystopian, chaotic, stressful and environmentally disastrous but gets everywhere where they want in a busy crowded world
This is from the first Total Recall from 2012
In fact this is it as at today – and possibly more broadly used in the near future. An early real example of what intelligent mobility looks like
This is robotaxi from Masdar City in the UAE. Part of a fleet of 10 autonomous taxis servicing 25,000 people per month - but for now operating on a closed to traffic, prescribed routes so without the usual risks and complexities faced by a London black cabbie
The future of mobility may be
less scary than Total Recall
but feel less cool than Back to The Future
however it will still help to solve a number of very key issues for both users and society, including ease of use, comfort and enjoyment in use, inclusive design - more broadly shared benefits, environmentally friendly, fast and safe.
Intelligent is a comparative concept. It is more informed or capable than now as a result of data access, analysis and usage for decisions.
It could come in small almost imperceivable changes, like park assist as an option for reverse parking on a narrow street or emergency brake assist reducing your ability to go into a skid while maximising the braking effect
Or it could have moments where quite transformative steps change things in a way we can’t quite predict and plan for, like the launch of the iPhone in 2007 triggered a transformation in personal digital interactions, products and expectations
Intelligent is a comparative concept - more informed or capable than now as a result of data access or usage. Combination of humans (needs, preferences and solutions) and technology (data capture, analytics, solutions/ optimisation within set constraints and data outputs)
It may be something as simple as a trolley in a supermarket to which you can scan in your shopping list and it directs you around the supermarket the most efficient way to collect the items. Or it could be autonomous community share mini buses. Both of these are already feasible.
By 2040 almost 1 in 4 of the population will be over 65 (24.2%)
The fastest growth will however be in the oldest old
Population of +85 in the UK are projected to double in the next 23 years
No transport provider - personal or public will want to lose 25% of the total market!
Source ONS 2017 https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/articles/overviewoftheukpopulation/july2017
A much higher proportion of older people lived in rural areas in 2002 as shown by the higher average age, and this has steadily increased to 2015.
Source: ONS 2014/15 Rural Survey
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/rural-population-and-migration/rural-population-201415#population-by-age
There is an excellent animated graphic
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/articles/overviewoftheukpopulation/july2017 if we have time to run it
Although mobility seems the obvious one to focus on here, dexterity, sensory and cognitive loss all impact transport solutions - ease and options
Whereas 1 in 7 people are born with a disability
By the time we are over 65, more than ½ of us have acquired at least one impairment that is severe and permanent enough to be classed as a disability
By the time we are over 75 it is 2 in 3 of us (and the co-morbidity rate is much higher then also)
Source: Family Resource Survey 2015/16
see https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/family-resources-survey--2
Technology is making it easier to solve for varying users needs and preferences. Inclusion is getting cheaper, easier to use and mainstreamed.
Voice interfaces: Siri and Alexa
Text to speech tech: Voiceover, Talkback
Haptics: Apple Watch taptics
I knew I was coming to speak on inclusive transport, specifically considering the needs of older users
So rather than think I knew already, or read and absorb work other people have done, I did what we like to do most - I asked the users we are talking about
Insight keeps knowledge fresh and relevant
Esp important as the new +65 “Baby Boomers” are very different to the last generation of older people. Let’s not assume we know from past what will be the expectations of the current generation of older travellers
used digital during their working careers, much more digitally aware, skilled and confident
wealthier at retirement as they benefited from the housing market prior to it reaching the unattainable highs that the current GenX are upset about as well as the general economic growth that supported growth in their wealth and kept them employed to a relatively high level (relative to other generations)
higher expectations of service as services have always been created that suit their needs given their number and relative wealth
are healthier at retirement and have greater expectations of ongoing work (albeit in a changed way potentially as people move to a second career that is part time or aligned closely to personal interests) travel, social, voluntary help (such as caring for grandkids or like my mother-in-law at a volunteer at Botanical Gardens) and other interactions
This compares with overall UK population impairments (+65) of
Mobility: 35% 65-75 and 50% 75+
Which shows a slight overweighting of people with mobility difficulties in the survey.As the survey was an opt in one about travel and transport that is not surprising but worth noting.
Vision: 10% 65-75 and 17% 75+
Hearing: 14% 65-75 and 23% 75+
Dexterity:19% 65-75 and 26% 75+
Memory : 9% 65-75 and 16% 75+
Speech: TBC
Source FRS 2015/16
Other modes (<25%)
13% Private bus / dial-a-ride
13% Private vehicle (eg Uber)
13% Cycle
13% Flights
Some 65yo are more like 80yo, others like 55 year olds
Some 85 year olds are more like 75 year olds while others are like 100 year olds
Some 100 year olds are as spritely as a 70 year young chicken!
Participant 1 is urban based, in relatively good health with impairments that don’t include mobility
Participant 2 is in a rural/village region, with mobility and other sensory impairments
Participant 2 is older than participant 1
Age is indicative of need.
Health, access needs and attitude such as personal independence and confidence are the differentiators not necessarily age or gender
Although age can’t be changed - attitude, health, confidence, sense of independence all can be, as can the adaptability and inclusiveness of the transport options themselves. Mobility constraints are not fixed to age. They are dependent on personal circumstances, attitude and the environment, services and technology on offer.
Each of these are the opportunities for Smart or Intelligent Mobility
Design out the barriers
Eg. 3 of these are connected. Crowded - standing involves risk of falling. Standing for +10mins or holding on when moving
Seating options and priority, app that provides available seating information prior to boarding and
Think of journey as full end-to-end experiences eg
Each of these are the opportunities for Smart or Intelligent Mobility
Design out the barriers
Eg. 3 of these are connected. Crowded - standing involves risk of falling. Standing for +10mins or holding on when moving
Seating options and priority, app that provides available seating information prior to boarding and
Each of these are the opportunities for Smart or Intelligent Mobility
Design out the barriers
Eg. 3 of these are connected. Crowded - standing involves risk of falling. Standing for +10mins or holding on when moving
Seating options and priority, app that provides available seating information prior to boarding and
Each of these are the opportunities for Smart or Intelligent Mobility
Design out the barriers
Eg. 3 of these are connected. Crowded - standing involves risk of falling. Standing for +10mins or holding on when moving
Seating options and priority, app that provides available seating information prior to boarding and
To some extent older people want “faster, cheaper horses” to misquote the Henry Ford quote
They don’t yet see what is possible with emerging new tech
However they want it to be safe, easy, reliable, cost and environmentally efficient in the way it gets them from their specific As to Bs
Differences in gender
Women travel more and not so far
Men travel less often but further
Social differences
Public/ private transport use is a economic divide issue
Generally not sure it will come and if it does, evenly split as to whether they would use it or not
(N) I wouldn’t feel safe!
(N) I don’t trust the technology yet. Not yet tested enough.
(N) I would not trust that technology on what are very busy roads and I would not be able to see when it went wrong.
(N) When they fail, I would be stranded as unable to walk
(Y) I think it would be great if I could have one. Would have the independence and none of the hassle.
(Y) For my current car the boot closes with the touch of a button, the hand brake is electronic, the steering is assisted, the gearbox is automatic, I have Park assist, the breaks have ABS, so why not have the car drive itself too?
(Y) I presume driverless cars will initially only be in cities and, as I don’t live in a city, therefore not normally available to me.
(Y) If these cars become widely available, I’d enjoy using one if I believed it was safe and if starting (or any other procedure) was possible with my hand tremor. However, I assume that these cars would be too expensive.
Great research provides insights
that increase the probability of success by
increasing the quality of management discussions and decisions and
shortening the time to improvements and innovation.
Not just working - also engaged in other value creation activities like childminding grandchildren or like my Granny, volunteering with Meals on Wheels and at the local Op shop through to her late 90th birthday
The rise of the “grey nomads”
Greater desire for independence later
“I think I’ll still be driving myself until I’m about 95 years old” John 76 yo
More open to taking advantage of new technologies as they emerge
Greater current adoption, usage (and ownership) of mobile technology
It may seem incremental starting with understanding barriers and looking to older audiences to create the future
However if you can solve for an older user who
has declining hearing and vision but has not yet adopted assistive technology such as hearing aids or medical intervention like cataract surgery
has Multiple Sclerosis so uses a motorised scooter from time to time, has low energy and stamina and both sight and dexterity challenges
is early stage dementia and english is a second language
Co-existing conditions are not uncommon but provide rich opportunity for really innovative end-to-end journey design and innovative, not incremental solutions
Besides benefiting the older community they were designed for,
it will also have a positive solutions benefit for people of any age with permanent access needs as well as all of us when we have temporary or situational access needs such as headphones on (hearing), full hands (dexterity), drunk, tired or stressed (cognitive) or injured
Lastly better adapted and design mobility solutions for the parts of the community that are currently underserved has positive social and economic benefits on society as a whole
Thank you and good luck creating great inclusive, intelligent mobility solutions