Knobbe partners Jeff Van Hoosear (OC) Jason Jardine (SD) and associate Julia Hanson (SD) recently gave a presentation at San Diego Fashion week on intellectual property for designers and artists. The presentation explored what IP is, why it is important to designers, top 5 misconceptions, how to get a copyright, how to get a trademark and how to get a design patent.
There are conferences and expos held worldwide on 3D printing, including its impact in the fashion industry.
Dutch designer Iris van Herpen has created a line emphasizing graceful, florid shapes thanks to 3D printing technology. Introduced at the 2018 Paris Fashion Week, her Spring/Summer 2018 collection of 21 pieces resorts to advanced digital technology such as laser-cutting, parametric design, and 3D printing. Balenciaga took 3D scans of models’ bodies to create jackets with only two seams: at the side and at the arm hole.
Shoe companies are competing for who can create the best shoes using 3D printing. Nike has partnered with HP to speed up their 3D printing technology. Adidas, New Balance, and Underarmour also have innovative 3D printed shoes. Adidas is using technology from a silicon valley start-up, Carbon, for the creation of its new 3-d printed mid-soles. “Digital Light Synthesis” technology uses light and oxygen to make plastic objects like the sneaker midsoles from a pool of resin, without any messy waste or need for injection molding.
Despite its immense benefits, 3D technology also comes with its challenges. Just as designers will be able to create a shoe at the click of a button, infringers can do the same. It will not be long before a 3D printer will allow anybody to produce an exact replica of any design made via 3D printing technology. The decreasing time required to design and produce shoe replicas will increase the importance of IP protection.
Soon Anybody Can Have an Exact Replica Of Any Design, Custom Made, at the Click of a Button…
Jury found Substantially Similar—awarded $7.39 million
Crocs, Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 598 F.3d 1294 (Fed. Cir. 2010). In one of several decisions involving design patents for CROCS shoes, the Federal Circuit held in favor of the plaintiff Crocs, finding that, when viewing the accused shoe designs side-by side with the patent drawings, the accused shoe designs were substantially similar to and, thus, infringing on plaintiff Crocs’ design patent The Federal Circuit
also reminded lower courts about the “misplaced reliance” on detailed verbal descriptions in design cases, which “risks undue emphasis on particular features of the design rather than examination of the design as a whole.” Crocs, 598 F.3d at 1302.
What was not decided was whether these designs were original enough to qualify for copyright protection—modicum of originality.
Unfortunately, the Star Athletica case was settled by the insurance carrier and dismissed
Talk about Why register on same slide
The point of the pictures is that the red-sole of Louboutin’s shoes and the design of the birkin bag are not trademarkable without secondary meaning. Thus, one strategy that both Louboutin and Hermes employ is that they file design patents on their products and this gives them time to acquire that secondary meaning required to register a shoe color or a product design as a trademark. Both Louboutin and Hermes have numerous registered design patents.
Louboutin red sole: U.S. Trademark Registration No. 3,361,597
Hermes, Birkin Bag: U.S. Trademark Registration Nos. 3,936,105 and 1,806,107
Obtain exclusivity in your market niche, design=appearance