Individual report mdp

Frederico Costa @00255034 2012

Live Projects 2012:
Individual Report

Frederico Costa
@00255034
Msc (Hons) Business Studies with IT
Page12

Contents

Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3

Team Building Process…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3

Contribution on Team Building……………………………………………………………………………………………………... 4, 5

Contribution on products & services ……………………………………………………………………………………………….6

Week Log ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..6–10

Reflection ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..11

Summary ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...11

References………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..12

Appendix

Team Leader Overview…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 13

Individual Overview as team leader……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 13, 14

Peer Assessment…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 15

Page12


Introduction

This report explains my point of view of work undertaken and skills developed on the module MDP2:
Live Projects 2012, applying the concept of Team Working, a personal contribution on the project, a
reflection part where it is explained in what this project helped me developing my skills and in what
I’ve used knowledge learned from other modules and a weekly log where it’s described the team’s
workload through this academic year and a reflection part, all this divided into an introduction, main
body and summary.

Team building process
“A good leader directs the sequence of steps the group take and keeps the group "on-track.” They
are good at controlling people and events and coordinating resources. They have the energy,
determination and initiative to overcome obstacles and bring competitive drive to the team. They
give shape to the team effort. They recognise the skills of the individuals and how they can be used.
Leaders are outgoing individuals who have to be careful not to be domineering. They can sometimes
steamroller the team but get results quickly. They may become impatient with complacency and lack
of progress and may sometimes overreact”.( http://www.kent.ac.uk/careers/sk/leadership.htm)

Based on this statement I used the following advantages of team working:

 Delegated power in order to have individual response;

 Faster productivity;

 New approaches and solutions;

 Use strengths of group members;
Page12


Contribution on Team Building

Source: http://www.kent.ac.uk/careers/sk/teamwork.htm

Page12

The chart above shows how I decided has a team leader to motivate and orientate the team through
team working. Based on the chart it can be said that the following motives were the key for the
team’s success:

 Focusing people on their tasks and co-relating departments;

 Being objective and goal-oriented – being aware of deadlines and achieving milestones;

 Motivating and creating enthusiasm on this project;

 Being supportive and making use of humour;

 Giving and listening to constructive feedback;

 Always be honest and comfortable showing points of view – building up confidence;

 Giving responsibilities and coordinating according to everyone’s strenghts;

 Taking positive attitude to face challenges;

 Using different skills from different people – supressing weaknesses and making everybody
comfortable doing their tasks;

Contribution on products & services (based on deliverables chart)

My past experience as a consultant and my previous Law degree helped me to easily write down the
full contract for the client. Since I am creative I was expected to give good ideas to our products and
services to be developed as well making use of my analysing skills I had influence on the market
research and SWOT analysis. For the same reason and after writing down the Project Scope I was
confident that I could pull out the team’s strengths and make sure that their responsibilities were
based on their skills so they could be comfortable on their tasks. Making use of my people and social
skills I helped some colleagues with their tasks but also being honest, sending back their parts and
asking for better and more dedicated results. In the end the client already achieved the results that
he wanted and the expo was a success so it can be said that our goal and vision were the right path
through success.
Page12


Practical contribution based on Week Log

12 October
Nivair and Terri first establishes contact between assigned group members Nivair and Terri set up an
agreed date to meet up at university.

13 October
MDP Consulting had formed as a group most members attend the first meeting excluding Amir and
Carl. The group has assigned team roles and e-mailed our client to set up a date of appointment.
Additionally we started to network ideas about how to meet our client’s needs. An online group has
been created for MDP Consulting to make contact easier between team members.

15 October
MDP Consulting attends their first tutorial with Mr Trodden. We raised concerns about the two
absent team members also our client that has not replied to our email. Mr Trodden raised concerns
and changed our client to Tempus Restaurant.

18 October
MDP Consulting establishes first contact with client; Mr Grove is happy discussing the current
Page12

project of Tempus restaurant.


19 October
MDP consulting had a meeting. We discussed the nature of the project and scope; Me and Nivair
discussed the milestones to be achieved and made an attempt to start the project planning.

20 October
Received a reply from Miss Oh (assistant manager) informing us that a date of appointment can be
established on Monday 23 October at 4pm.

21 October
Attended our tutorial with Mr Trodden Carl and Amir are also present at the tutorial we discussed
our progress we made with Mr Trodden he seemed pleased.

23 October
We have our first meeting with Mr Grove. We discussed our milestones and our objectives that
needed to be met for our live projects module. Mr grove identified problems within the organisation
and exchanged ideas on how to tackle the problems. Our dress code was formal dress wear. We
gave the contract to Mr grove to be signed which is an agreement on objectives that need to be met
for the live projects specification. Mr Grove was impressed with the group and especially the
professionalism of speech. Mr Grove gave us a whole tour around the hotel identifies key aspects of
the hotel.

26 October
Our group had a meeting to summarise what tasks that need to be met and also appropriate the
tasks fairly. Nivair and me had started to make an attempt to write up the business plan and
marketing strategy whilst Terri was assigned to keep the minutes and keep contact with Mr Grove
with Omer. Carl was assigned to help design our group logo.

28 October
We had a meeting with our tutor discussing our progress so far. We all handed in our personal
statements to Mr Trodden as requested. Mr Trodden seemed impressed with the fast progress we
have made.

5 November
A meeting took place at university. We discussed our project scope, plan (including task deliverables)
and risk assessment that needed to be handed in additionally the meeting with Mr grove to be taken
place in 2 days.

7 November
Omer attended the second meeting with Mr Grove as it was his duty as public relations the whole
group did not attend as advised. Omer took pictures of the hotel which was to be included in the
Page12

redesign of the website, menu, logo banner.


11 November
We attended our meeting with Patrick discussing our recent concerns about the project deliverables
and our PowerPoint presentation that was to be presented to Mr Grove. He reviewed our
PowerPoint and indicated what needed to be improved and changed. Me and Nivair completed the
project and submitted the project plan before the deadline.

14 November
We had done a SWOT analysis in order to understand the business strengths, opportunities,
weaknesses and threats.
Also delegated responsibilities putting Wu in charge to check prices for banners and the rest of the
team to analyse what the hotel could do to improve the booking service to the restaurant and Carl
was assigned to design banners and menus for the restaurant following the client’s instructions and
limitations to re-create those products for the tempus restaurant.

18 November
The SWOT analysis was our main tool in this meeting to explore opportunities to the restaurant,
suppressing weaknesses and avoiding threats while maintaining its strengths and the team came up
with a few ideas based on the SWOT analysis.

21 November
The team has done a presentation in the meeting with the tutor. Patrick was impressed with the
quality of it and our communicating skills too. The ideas were a success at the eyes of our tutor
which has great experience in the sector.

1 December
The team decided to do some research to see if the SWOT analysis was similar to some other hotels.
Also some products and services were evaluated by us to see where the Tempus Restaurant could
have what is called in Marketing as a competitive advantage.

2 December
I and Nivair attended a meeting with Mr Trodden discussing recent progress with our project.

7 December
A meeting took place at university to clarify objectives to be met for Mr Grove.

15 December
We compiled a PowerPoint presentation including everyone’s contributions to their part of the slide.
We decided appropriate the presentation into sections so that each member had their individual
part.

9 January
The research was delivered to the Deputy Manager and analysed in group. I wasn’t present due to
my grandmother’s death.

10 January

Due to a setback of Frederico’s personal issues Nivair had to fill post of team leader Nivair called an
emergency meeting at university discussing what objectives needed to be done to avoid falling
Page12

behind during the exam period. We also revised our PowerPoint presentation to improve our
presentation skills.


January 13
Presented our presentation to Mr Trodden which is to be presented to Mr Grove; Frederico was
absent due to family issues. Mr Trodden was impressed with the level of professionalism and clarity
of the presentation.

20 January
Mr Trodden gave our team feedback on our personal statements he also asked if our group had any
concerns. We raised concerns with the level of communication with our client as our client seemed
very busy.

3 February
Omer raised concerns about team management as he felt that the team was communicating
ineffectively and working together in a non-consistent non cohesive manner. Frederico raised some
concerns about the progress report and deadlines. Also explained to Omer and to the whole team
that there’s a weekly meeting and a meeting with the tutor every 2 weeks and people need to be
aware of what is talked in the meetings and if don’t attend need to check the minutes and deadlines
as they are available to every student in this module and not only to the team leader, that has the
responsibility to motivate the team to do their work but not to be anyone’s secretary.
I went through my peer assessment with the group explaining why people rewarded the mark I gave
for each criteria of the peer assessment. It was helpful recognising where we have made mistakes so
we could improve on it. We all agreed to make Omer the new team leader as the group felt that I
had too many responsibilities on my shoulders.

9 February
Meeting at university; the agenda was to establish contact with Mr Grove and prepare for a meeting
with Mr Grove. Our main aim was to preserve our relationship with Mr Grove since the last meeting
and also prepare what ideas to present to him. Nivair appropriated what tasks needed to be done.

13 February
All the members attended and gave their parts of the report to Omer, who has supervised the
progress report draft.
The Draft was very poor and our tutor advised us to do a better one while we had time to deliver it
on time. He believes that our potential should not be ‘represented’ by such a poor draft so UNTIL
THE END OF THE DAY we should come up with a fine Progress Report or just send this one.
I took the lead as Omer did not show any progress in this matter (with no objections from the rest of
the team) asking the colleagues to re-send their parts but improving it. Frederico has written the
progress report in a way that would look written by only one person (as Patrick asked us to make it
look like).
27 February
We had satisfactory feedback from Mr.Grove and Nivair has sent it to Mr Patrick.

9 March
Meeting is to specify what tasks are allocated to arrange the meeting with Mr Grove and inform all
group members about individual reports, final reports and expo.
Page12

Nivair got reply from Mr Grove and e-mailed them to know if they are on target of what is needed.

Terri and Wu progressed with the banners and key rings prices and forms (with supervision of
Nivair).

12 March
Mr Grove contacts Nivair explaining the agenda of the meeting and giving us a choice what date to
pick to meet. Nivair establishes an online meeting.
14 March
We had a meeting with Mr Grove at 6pm. As Mr Grove said to do not bring all the team Omer,
Nivair, Wu and Amir represented Mdp Consulting. Nivair brought all the equipment necessary to
perform the presentation done a few months ago. It went well. Also updated feedback since the
progress report was taken.
Mr Grove delivered great feedback (apart from client feedback) after a good presentation prepared
for 2 months.
All the products/services/procedures were accepted expect the key ring, which was ‘updated’ to a
medal pound coin that could have use even after a customer leaves the hotel.
April 6
Meeting up to summarise the meeting that took place with Mr Grove. Mr Grove identified that
implicit advertising through the key ring fob was a simple but effective idea so we proceeded with
that idea. Additionally the ideas of the Smart phone, the banner design and canapés was approved
so we appropriated the tasks that needed to be done.

April 12
I and Nivair have a meeting; we both piece together the final parts of the final progress report. And
pass it on to Carl to be formatted.

April 19
Nivair and Frederico have a meeting online establishing a date of appointment; Nivair decides to
print of a draft of the final progress report so that it can be assessed by group members for the next
meeting.

April 20
Meeting we discuss how to write our final individual reports and brief on expo to be taken place.
Nivair and I piece together the yearly diary so this will aid members to write their individual reports.

Page12


Reflection

Through this module I’ve learned that leadership is not enough to be a good team leader. Leading by
example makes anyone more responsible and organized. Furthermore, learning from everybody’s
strengths made me a more complete individual (e.g. I am creative but learned with Carl Price how to
put my creativity into a design program). MDP made me look into business with a different
perspective: what we learn matters. Facing some problems motivating the team due to their other
responsibilities on their other modules, I’ve learned that flexibility is the key to success, alongside
with encouragement and professionalism; If I was not flexible my team wouldn’t deliver their works
on time with excellence so I had a look on People Management notes to motivate the team, creating
bonds between us and encourage them awakening the confidence inside them, because alone I
could not deliver such great products, services or think of procedures to be taken in the Palace Hotel
to lead the customers to the Tempus restaurant. All this allied with excellence in the delivered
solutions made me more professional in everything I do. Also the Rich Media module made me look
into multimedia in a different perspective so a smartphone app (more than a website as every hotel
has one) alongside with Marketing ‘principles of competitive advantage’ made the team deliver an
excellent tool to captivate customers in the long-run.

Also my tutor, Mr Patrick Trodden had a huge impact on me. He made me feel that being confident
and business oriented was the key to my success in this module and that I could not take care of
everything by myself so listening to the others and be humble enough to accept new ideas from
people better than me in certain areas was a tool to drive this team to success.

For last, I looked to this module as a project, establishing milestones, margin errors and following
the theory of project failure given in the Project Management classes I made sure that I was covering
every possibility of failure.

Summary

It was an excellent but hard working module where I’ve learned how to combine abstract and
practical skills and dealing with deadlines where I needed to meet up a real client’s expectations.

Moreover, it has strengthen my point of view about team working and hierarchies and made of me a
decision-maker and now I believe that I am a more complete individual that had the honour of
learning through experience.
Page12


References

(2012)http://www.kent.ac.uk/careers/sk/teamwork.htm University of Kent

(2012)http://www.kent.ac.uk/careers/sk/leadership.htm University of Kent

Jamal, T., Smith, B. and Watson, E. (2008) “Ranking, Rating and Scoring, Tourism Management,
Vol.9 No1, Pages 66-68

Linton, J.D. and Thongpapanl, N. (2004), “Perspective: ranking the technology Innovation
Management journals”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 21 No. 2,
pp. 123-39.

Duchastel, Philippe C. “Marginalia.” The Technology of Text: Principles for Structuring, Designing
and Displaying Text. Vol. 2. Ed. David H. Jonassen. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology
Publications, 1985. 210-236.

Defining yield management and measuring its impact on hotel performance
P Jones - Ingold, McMahon-Beattie, and Yeoman (Eds) Yield …, 2000

Page12


Appendix

Team Leader Overview (document delivered to tutor to base team leader reviews)

I was assigned Team Leader (Frederico Costa) for team 27 on our second meeting, in the first tutorial
(we had a meeting before to brainstorm possibilities to help our client), maybe because we did not
have a structure to debate and I organised a debate and led the team dividing research to do they
thought I was the most suitable person to be the Chairman. From my point of view my leadership,
organisational skills and a continuous sense of ‘not wasting time in business’ acquired from previous
working experience in the banking sector made me be seen as a focused and reliable team leader.

Nivair Merdono was assigned has Deputy Leader since he has exceptional organisational skills. Omer
Aly proposed himself to be Public Relations and in fact he has good communication skills so the
position was suitable for him. Yujing Wu arrived UK a few months ago and was not comfortable with
the language but because she is studying Business with Economics I thought that the ‘Finance
Responsibilities’ could suit her ambitions in the group and she happily accepted the position.

Terri Kay seemed to be organised and assertive so it was decided that she could have the
Administrative responsibilities.

Motivated with such a project (promote the restaurant that actually belongs to the Palace Hotel, a
four star superior) the team worked hard looking for possible ways of promoting the restaurant
(trying to compensate the 3 weeks wasted) brainstorming and trying to get ahead of possible refuses
for the ideas.

Since there my main duty was not just do my part of the work and organise the team, I needed to
pull out the strengths of each individual and supress their weaknesses at the eyes of the client,
letting talk the ones with confidence to talk, putting other people doing some work exploring their
individualism to present to the tutor and the client, making use of the fact that 3 of us were studying
IT and 6 of us are in a Business related course analyse and compare every possibility to bring a new
service, product or procedure to the client.

Individual overview for each member:

Nivair Merdono: Excellent in terms of attendance in the meetings and very good organisational skills.
On the other hand does too much ‘by heart’, by impulse when his position demanded more
experience to deal with problems like deadlines. Like me, he has the ‘urgency’ to get the work done.

Designing is not his best attribute but it is compensated with hard work always on top of everything.
Page12

Omer Aly: Poor attendance to the meetings. Excellent communication skills but much disorganised.
Democratically attempted a ‘coupe d’état’ saying that from his point of view the delegations were
always given too close to the deadlines. It was explained that everything was posted on a shared file
online and at this stage of our studies he should know the ‘rule’ (if he is not attending to the meeting
he needs to check the minutes and resume of the meeting) instead of complaining all the time. Given
the opportunity to do it his way, he delegated all the work to team members and made a poor draft
of a report and the team was not happy with the quality of his work, since for him delegating
everything to the others and not having any work to do and then making a poor draft that could
have blown our hopes to have a good mark in this module, the team decided not to have it and
everything was back to normal. Besides not attending and lacking organisation he has excellent
communication skills and has good concepts for business but no organisation and the wrong concept
of team working, where it should be divided based on each other’s strengths and not just assuming
that the leader should just divide the tasks not having any task for himself to do.

Terri Kay: Good attendance to the meetings and always on top of her tasks. Passed good information
about Tourism and Leisure. Every time she could not attend to a meeting she informed the leader or
deputy. The minutes were always organised by her or the deputy who was in charge of keeping it
updated. Could make better use of multimedia to spread the information but the important is that
she has done her tasks. Good communication skills but could have delivered more ideas but she has
done all the tasks that was asked for.

Wu Yujing: Excellent attendance to the meetings. Very good ideas but poor communication skills. I’ve
spent the whole academic year building up her confidence to talk more since her ideas were really
good and I developing skills was part of my job it has resulted with Wu. Has a good understanding of
business cycles and all the tasks that was asked to do she accomplished them with great effort.

Carl Price: Joined the group later but I’ve always seen him as a great ‘add-on’ to the team. Great IT
skills, creative and transformed all the ideas given to him into products. Satisfactory commitment
with the project but no enthusiasm, which maybe is part of his way if living. Regular attendance to
the meetings.

Amir: Excellent attendance to the meetings. Not being exceptional he always made an effort to
accomplish his tasks and be present. Good communication skills but not assertive.
Page12

Names of your team

Amir
Costa
Nivair
members

Frederico

Terri Kay
Merdomo

Carl Price
Omer Aly

Yujing Wu
4
5
4
4
2
5
4
Peer Assessment
group meetings, Regular attendance at

5
5
4
5
3
5
4
discussion, planning etc.Was available at other times for

4
4
4
3
3
4
4
Maintain good communication with the team

4
4
5
4
4
5
4
Worked effectively with other team members

4
3
4
4
3
4
5
cohesionContribution to needs of the team, leadership, team

3
3
3
4
3
3
3
Provided innovative suggestions for project

4
3
5
5
2
5
5
Achieving agreed tasks to adequate standards

4
4
4
5
3
4
4
Undertake a fair share of the work

3
4
3
4
3
4
4
Professional attitude to team and client

3
4
4
4
3
4
4

Positive attitude towards the work and the project

38
39
40
42
29
43
41

Total

Page12


Page12

Individual report mdp

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to Individual report mdp

Similar to Individual report mdp (20)

More from Frederico Costa

More from Frederico Costa (9)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Individual report mdp