An escalation policy is a documented guideline instructs team members on the appropriate procedures for escalating the incident management process. This policy delineates the hierarchy of alert escalation and the distribution of responsibilities within your organization. When the issue is more complex and impossible, the staff at Level-1 transfers the incident to a higher-level expert team.

1. Incident Escalation Guideline
Home » Blog » Incident Escalation Guideline
The escalation process goes by various names and assessments during the incident response.
We aimed to understand these differences to better focus on objectives and achieve results,
which led us to explore this topic.
An escalation policy is a documented guideline instructs team members on the appropriate
procedures for escalating the incident management process. This policy delineates the
hierarchy of alert escalation and the distribution of responsibilities within your organization.
When the issue is more complex and impossible, the staff at Level-1 transfers the incident to a
higher-level expert team.
During the incident phase, especially after a data breach, Level 1 escalates the issue to the more
expert Level 2 and beyond.
 Cyblu  December 25, 2023  No Comments
Search...
January 16, 2024
CybersecurityTraining
And Bootcamps From
Cyblu
December 28, 2023
Incident ResponseBest
Practices:A Guide...
December 25, 2023
Incident Escalation
Guideline
July 15, 2023
Top CybersecurityThreats
For2023And...
Recent Posts
Categories
Cyber Crime
Cyber Security
Incident Escalation
Incident Response
Security
Tags
Cybersecurity Analyst Bootcamps
Cybersecurity Boot Camp
Hands-On Cybersecurity Training

Email: info@cyblu.com 7600 Chevy Chase Dr, Suite 300, Austin, TX 78752
(210) 460-0004
  
 

Academy Services  Blog About Us Contact Us

2. All Members of CIRC (Cyber Incident Response Center) are very excited about the issue that
could not be solved in Level-1 and the greater risk; sometimes, excitement makes people make
mistakes. Therefore, what needs to be done at this point of the problem should be written in
detail and taught to the members.
Now, let’s explore the idea of an escalation policy and delve into creating an efficient policy that
bolsters our organization’s incident response plan.
At the time of the incident:
It should provide clear criteria for when an incident should be escalated to the next level.
Whether the incident occurs during or outside business hours should be kept separate, and
rules should be set for both situations.
It needs to be determined who will report the incident and to whom the report should be made.
Confidentiality of the case is paramount. For this reason, the person to whom the incident will
be conveyed and the transmitters must be determined well in advance. Reporting the incident
to an influential and authorized person plays a vital role in resolving the incident. Sometimes, if
there is an important issue such as ransomware, it is necessary to act more thoughtfully.
The Incident Needs To Be Reported To The Relevant Party In A Specific Manner:
The entire workflow should be done with tools that provide secure and fast communication, for
example, ChatOps, Slack, Microsoft Teams,
DevOps.
The escalation process needs to be clearly defined: The team working on this issue should
summarize and explain all aspects of the incident. If the organization uses “automated incident
response management tools,” the team must know their workflow and that the reported
incident is an incident. If the institution has yet to have the opportunity to reach a higher level,
it should inform in advance what it will do.
Here are the things to do after the incident is delivered to the relevant person safely and safely.
Organizations commonly classify incidents using a three or five-tier severity scale, where each
level dictates a unique response. For instance, a three-tier system might rank incidents from
SEV 3 to SEV 1, with increasing importance.
Severity levels in organizations usually vary, falling within a range of one to three, four, or five,
where SEV 1 represents the most critical incidents, and the most significant number (3, 4, or 5)
indicates the least severe cases.
Severity levels are not standardized; they are defined based on what matters most to your
organization and its users. While three levels suffice for some companies, others might find
dividing incidents into five groups more suitable. Severity levels are not standardized; they are
defined based on what matters most to your organization and its users. While three levels
suffice for some companies, others might find dividing incidents into five groups more suitable.
Below are the definitions for a five-level system:
Let’s divide this accident into five or three, but the first level is the most severe. The accident in
the first level should be tried to be solved in the five stages shown above.
In this regard, SEV-1 is a critical issue affecting many users in a production environment. The
problem affects essential services or inaccessible services, negatively impacting the customer
Incident Escalation Guideline
Incident Response

3. experience. For Sev 1 incidents, it’s vital for staff to intervene thoughtfully at an early stage to
decide the appropriate time to notify stakeholders.
Some organizations use two different words to express the degree of severity of the incident,
but they mean the same thing. One of these is priority, and the other is severity.
Priority and severity frequently align perfectly; for example, an outage stopping all users from
accessing a service is classified as high priority and SEV 1.
But very few times, something that is a priority may be minimal in severity.
It is necessary to write a separate topic to determine incident severity levels. We won’t get into
that issue now.
Each organization assigns different names to levels of violence and priorities and establishes
designated response times at various intervals.
Accordingly, some organizations have explained the solution with the reporting period as
follows:
P1 (priority 1) must be reported to the upper level within 15 minutes and resolved within 4
hours.
P2 (priority 2) must be reported to the upper level within 1 hour and resolved within 9 hours.
P3 (priority 3) must be reported to the upper level within 4 hours and resolved within 18 hours.
P4 (priority 4) must be reported to the upper level within 9 hours and resolved within 45 hours.
Etc.
Conclusion
Different solutions and naming can be done to escalate to the upper level. No matter what
method we apply, we must make a rule.
An escalation policy is essential for guaranteeing that critical incidents receive proper
attention from support staff and that the right teams and management are informed in the
event of an incident. It offers a straightforward process for staff to respond to incidents and
simplifies the documentation and auditing of your incident response.
References
https:/
/www.xmatters.com/blog/how-to-build-an-escalation-policy-for-effective-incident-
management#:~:text=An%20escalation%20policy%20is%20a,time%20in%20an%20incident’s%20lifec
.
https:/
/www.splunk.com/en_us/blog/learn/incident-severity-levels.html
https:/
/ut.service-now.com/sp?id=kb_article&number=KB0011708
Tags: Incident Escalation Guideline
Contact Info
Hotline:
Phone: (210) 460-0004

Email:
info@cyblu.com

Address:
7600 Chevy Chase Dr, Suite 300, Austin, TX
78752

Quick Support
Contact Us

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Cookie Policy for Cyblu


4. Copyright @2023 CYBLU. All Rights Reserved. Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy