In the case People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals V Daughney: Was there any indication that Doughney was cybersquatting? Solution Yes in the case between PETA (People for the ethical treatment of animals) and daughney, there was an indication of cybersquatting. In simple language cybersquatting to use the domain name of others and also the good will they have already to get profit with some bad intentent and in this case Daughney has used the domain of peta and its intention is towards get profit from the animals and PETA is aganist it. So finally doughney has surrendered the domain..