This document summarizes a research paper that examines the impact of organizational justice on organizational effectiveness. It begins by defining organizational justice and distinguishing between its two main forms: distributive justice and procedural justice. It then reviews several studies that found positive relationships between perceptions of organizational justice and factors like job satisfaction and organizational commitment, which are indirectly linked to organizational effectiveness. The document concludes that promoting fairness in procedures and outcomes can increase employee performance and commitment, which are key to effective organizations. It identifies the need for more longitudinal research directly examining the relationship between organizational justice and effectiveness.
14 the relationship between job burnout, organizational citizenship behavior,...INFOGAIN PUBLICATION
Organizational citizenship behaviors refer to optional behaviors which are not clearly defined by the organization’s official reward system. Overall, these behaviors improve the organization’s performance. Job burnout is on the other hand a psychological response to the mental pressures of a job, which includes three components of emotional burnout, depersonalization, and perceptions regarding self-inefficacy. Organizational citizenship behavior has a positive effect on organizational performance while job burnout has a negative effect on organizational performance. Accordingly, the current study evaluates the roles organizational citizenship behaviors and job burnout play in the occupational performance of the employees. The current study is a descriptive survey. In order to realize the objectives of the study, a sample of 311 participants among the staff members of the country’s State Tax Organization has been selected. A questionnaire was used for gathering the required data. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire were confirmed using Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient and confirmatory factor analysis. In order to analyze the obtained data structural equation modeling (SEM) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were utilized. The findings show that job burnout and organizational citizenship behavior have a significant relationship with occupational performance. Also, the components of job burnout and the components of organizational citizenship behavior have a significant relationship with occupational performance.
Organizational Justice and Job Satisfaction of Health Workers in Example of P...inventionjournals
The purpose of this study is to determine the levels of organizational justice perceptions and job satisfaction of health workers, and to show the relationship between organizational justice and job satisfaction. Within the study, organizational justice and job satisfaction scales were administered by 377 personnel in a public hospital in Turkey. According to the findings of the research, it has been found that there is a moderately significant relationship between three dimensions of organizational justice and job satisfaction. In particular, interaction justice and procedural justice have been found to affect employees' job satisfaction levels more particularly.
This research paper explores the Effect of Organizational Justice dimensions (Distributive Justice, Procedural Justice, Interactional Justice) on Organizational Engagement in public sector banks of Pakistan: Mediating role of Work Engagement
14 the relationship between job burnout, organizational citizenship behavior,...INFOGAIN PUBLICATION
Organizational citizenship behaviors refer to optional behaviors which are not clearly defined by the organization’s official reward system. Overall, these behaviors improve the organization’s performance. Job burnout is on the other hand a psychological response to the mental pressures of a job, which includes three components of emotional burnout, depersonalization, and perceptions regarding self-inefficacy. Organizational citizenship behavior has a positive effect on organizational performance while job burnout has a negative effect on organizational performance. Accordingly, the current study evaluates the roles organizational citizenship behaviors and job burnout play in the occupational performance of the employees. The current study is a descriptive survey. In order to realize the objectives of the study, a sample of 311 participants among the staff members of the country’s State Tax Organization has been selected. A questionnaire was used for gathering the required data. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire were confirmed using Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient and confirmatory factor analysis. In order to analyze the obtained data structural equation modeling (SEM) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were utilized. The findings show that job burnout and organizational citizenship behavior have a significant relationship with occupational performance. Also, the components of job burnout and the components of organizational citizenship behavior have a significant relationship with occupational performance.
Organizational Justice and Job Satisfaction of Health Workers in Example of P...inventionjournals
The purpose of this study is to determine the levels of organizational justice perceptions and job satisfaction of health workers, and to show the relationship between organizational justice and job satisfaction. Within the study, organizational justice and job satisfaction scales were administered by 377 personnel in a public hospital in Turkey. According to the findings of the research, it has been found that there is a moderately significant relationship between three dimensions of organizational justice and job satisfaction. In particular, interaction justice and procedural justice have been found to affect employees' job satisfaction levels more particularly.
This research paper explores the Effect of Organizational Justice dimensions (Distributive Justice, Procedural Justice, Interactional Justice) on Organizational Engagement in public sector banks of Pakistan: Mediating role of Work Engagement
Procedural justice: Inclusive process for inclusive growth, E. Allan LindOECD Governance
Presentation by E. Allan Lind, James L. Vincent Distinguished Professor of Leadership, Duke University, at the 6th Expert Meeting on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement in Regulatory Policy, Academic Speaker, The Hague, 16-18 June 2014. Further information is available at http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/
The Effect of Perceived Organizational Support and Safety Climate on Voluntar...Waqas Tariq
A model investigating the relationship between safety climate, perceived organizational support, and voluntary turnover is developed and tested with data collected from the trucking industry. Perceived organizational support is shown to mediate the relationship between safety climate and voluntary turnover, but this effect occurs only with tenured employees who are not at the beginning or end of their careers. This implicates a curvilinear relationship of the variables and offers statistical support for a temporal nature of perceived organizational support which has not been found in previous studies.
The Relationship Between Organizational Theory & Behavior TheoryMaurice Dawson
This reaction paper will exhibit when organizational theories and behavioral theories are not aligned properly, an organization will become unmotivated, chaotic, and misguided. Through selections of various authors, these theories will be explained more in depth and how they relate to each other.
A Research Aimed at Determining Employees' Ethical Climate Perceptions in Acc...inventionjournals
Ethical climate, is one of the most important factors influencing behavior and relationships with in the organization which is considered to be common perception in dealing with the ethics problems and what are the ethically right and wrong behaviors of employees. The main objective of this research is to expose the ethical climate perceptions of employees in the accommodation establishments. And also is to determine ethical climate perception of the employees whether is indicating a significant difference with demographic characteristics who participated in the research. For this purpose, it was carried out a survey to 102 employes who work in accommodation establishments in Hatay province. According to research results; employes stated that they most act in the helpfulness behavior. Additionally there is no significant difference between the dimensions of ethical climate and gender, marital status, age variable. However there is significant difference between egotistic dimension of ethical climate and education status variable.
International Journal of Business and Management Invention (IJBMI)inventionjournals
International Journal of Business and Management Invention (IJBMI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Business and Management. IJBMI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Business and Management, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online
International Journal of Business and Management Invention (IJBMI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Business and Management. IJBMI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Business and Management, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online
Procedural justice: Inclusive process for inclusive growth, E. Allan LindOECD Governance
Presentation by E. Allan Lind, James L. Vincent Distinguished Professor of Leadership, Duke University, at the 6th Expert Meeting on Measuring Regulatory Performance: Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement in Regulatory Policy, Academic Speaker, The Hague, 16-18 June 2014. Further information is available at http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/
The Effect of Perceived Organizational Support and Safety Climate on Voluntar...Waqas Tariq
A model investigating the relationship between safety climate, perceived organizational support, and voluntary turnover is developed and tested with data collected from the trucking industry. Perceived organizational support is shown to mediate the relationship between safety climate and voluntary turnover, but this effect occurs only with tenured employees who are not at the beginning or end of their careers. This implicates a curvilinear relationship of the variables and offers statistical support for a temporal nature of perceived organizational support which has not been found in previous studies.
The Relationship Between Organizational Theory & Behavior TheoryMaurice Dawson
This reaction paper will exhibit when organizational theories and behavioral theories are not aligned properly, an organization will become unmotivated, chaotic, and misguided. Through selections of various authors, these theories will be explained more in depth and how they relate to each other.
A Research Aimed at Determining Employees' Ethical Climate Perceptions in Acc...inventionjournals
Ethical climate, is one of the most important factors influencing behavior and relationships with in the organization which is considered to be common perception in dealing with the ethics problems and what are the ethically right and wrong behaviors of employees. The main objective of this research is to expose the ethical climate perceptions of employees in the accommodation establishments. And also is to determine ethical climate perception of the employees whether is indicating a significant difference with demographic characteristics who participated in the research. For this purpose, it was carried out a survey to 102 employes who work in accommodation establishments in Hatay province. According to research results; employes stated that they most act in the helpfulness behavior. Additionally there is no significant difference between the dimensions of ethical climate and gender, marital status, age variable. However there is significant difference between egotistic dimension of ethical climate and education status variable.
International Journal of Business and Management Invention (IJBMI)inventionjournals
International Journal of Business and Management Invention (IJBMI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Business and Management. IJBMI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Business and Management, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online
International Journal of Business and Management Invention (IJBMI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Business and Management. IJBMI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Business and Management, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online
Leadership & Organization Development JournalEmployee justic.docxsmile790243
Leadership & Organization Development Journal
Employee justice perceptions and coworker relationships
Monica Forret Mary Sue Love
Article information:
To cite this document:
Monica Forret Mary Sue Love, (2008),"Employee justice perceptions and coworker relationships",
Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 29 Iss 3 pp. 248 - 260
Permanent link to this document:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437730810861308
Downloaded on: 20 March 2017, At: 10:38 (PT)
References: this document contains references to 45 other documents.
To copy this document: [email protected]
The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 5177 times since 2008*
Users who downloaded this article also downloaded:
(2011),"Organizational justice and employee satisfaction in performance appraisal", Journal of European
Industrial Training, Vol. 35 Iss 8 pp. 826-840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090591111168348
(2014),"Organizational justice and employee engagement: Exploring the linkage in public sector banks in
India", Personnel Review, Vol. 43 Iss 4 pp. 628-652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/PR-08-2013-0148
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:444336 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for
Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines
are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company
manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as
providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee
on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive
preservation.
*Related content and download information correct at time of download.
D
ow
nl
oa
de
d
by
U
ni
ve
rs
it
y
of
M
ar
yl
an
d
U
ni
ve
rs
it
y
C
ol
le
ge
U
M
U
C
A
t
10
:3
8
20
M
ar
ch
2
01
7
(P
T
)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437730810861308
Employee justice perceptions and
coworker relationships
Monica Forret
Department of Managerial Studies, St Ambrose University,
Davenport, Iowa, USA, and
Mary Sue Love
Department of Management and Marketing,
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, Illinois, USA
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this investigation is to explore whether perceptions of organizational
justice are related to coworker trust and morale. As jobs have become more broadly defined and
collaboration with colleagues has become increasingly important for accomplishing work, coworker
relationships are especially critical to manage effectively.
Design/methodo ...
A Study of Perceived Organizational Justice, Trust, and Organisational Citize...IOSR Journals
The present organizations in which cut throat competition is there among employees, organizational justice and trust become more important to develop organizational citizenship behavior. organisation citizenship behavior is voluntary behavior on the part of employee which does not bring any reward to them. An employee who feels like citizen of organization does something extra for organization and coworkers which is not described in job description. Many previous researches proved impact of trust on organizational citizenship behavior and impact of organizational justice on organizational citizenship behavior. This study attempts to find out impact of trust and justice on OCB separately as well as combined impact of both the variables on OCB in service industry of Gwalior (MP, India).various statistical tools like reliability analysis and regression analysis was applied to the gathered data to fulfill the objective of the study.
Finally, let us understand that when we stand together, we will always win. When men and women stand together for justice, we win. When black, white and Hispanic people stand together for justice, we win.
- Bernie Sanders
Running head: MANAGEMENTSTYLES 1
MANAGEMENTSTYLES 2
An Analysis of Management Styles in the Criminal Justice System
Joe Student
American Intercontinental University
Abstract
The most important aspect of any organization is its leadership and management. This sentiment is no different in the criminal justice community. Operating a law enforcement agency or a correctional facility involves a highly specialized brand of leadership. This writing will discuss three separate management styles. The management styles that will be discussed will be scientific management, human relations management, and systems management styles. After discussing each style, the author will determine what style would be most affected for use in the criminal justice system. The author will do this by citing examples where this style is being utilized in various agencies throughout the country. After offering that explanation, the author will discuss the disadvantages of utilizing the other 2 management styles within that same community. The author will then offer an opinion as to whether or not all three components of the criminal justice system should use the same style of management.
Which to how do you believe would be the most effective to use in the criminal justice system?
Management is a term that can be quite difficult to define. In trying to define this term, it will become apparent to many that it is easier to identify the duties of a manager rather than defining the term itself. There are some that would describe management as planning goals and specify the purpose of a particular agency. Others may define it as an individual who organizes, finances, and performs other task in leading staff or an organization. At any length, management is largely considered to be an ongoing progress that works towards achieving organizational goals. It is a multi-layered entity in any corporation that focuses on getting task accomplish through a variety of individuals with the minimum amount of effort, cost, and waste. This is all done in order to achieve the goals of an organization. (Allen & Sawhney, 2010)
The scientific management theory that was founded by Frederick Winslow Taylor. This school of thought attempted to study the work process from a scientific standpoint. This spirit was often referred to as Taylorism. The main objective of Taylorism is to improve economic efficiency and labor productivity. The philosophy behind Taylorism focused on the premise that making a person work as hard as they could was not as efficient as getting the most out of how a person’s work was done. This gave birth to the idea of working smarter, not harder. Taylorism saw to use a systematic and scientific approach to the study of jobs. Taylorism relies on the study of time and movement needed for a job in order to improve the overall performance of the work. The scientific management style basically calls for the worker to adjust to the management and not the management t.
Well Being, Fairness, and Supervisor’s Ability and Support IJSRP Journal
To maximize work outcomes and increase the opportunity for organizations to achieve their goals in today’s society, organizations must prioritize their employees’ well-being. Research suggests that several factors can impact employees including: affective well-being, employee perception of fairness, perception of supervisors’ skills and Family Supportive Supervisor Behaviors (FSSB). To investigate the relationship between employees' affective well-being, their perceptions of fairness, their perceived ability and FSSB, a study was conducted using a total of 395 participants, who were selected using convenience sampling. Participants completed a survey by answering three questionnaires, which measured the constructs, and the pertinent demographics. The instruments used were the Job-related Affective Well-being Scale (JAWS), the Equity/Fairness subscale from the International Personality Item Pool, the Ability subscale, and the Creative work-family management subscale from the Handbook of Management Scales, respectively. Results of this study found a moderate positive correlation between employees’ affective well-being and the following variables: perception of fairness (r=.301, p=.000), perceived supervisor’s ability (r=.401, p=.000), and FSSB (r=.377, p=.000), as well as between employees’ perception of fairness and managerial skills of their supervisors (r=.347, p=.000). Findings confirmed hypotheses and the relationship among variables. The study’s findings have implications for managers’ performance and for HR practices.
International Journal of Business and Management Invention (IJBMI)inventionjournals
International Journal of Business and Management Invention (IJBMI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Business and Management. IJBMI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Business and Management, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online.
TheIncubatorAttribution theory in the organizational.docxssusera34210
The
Incubator
Attribution theory in the organizational
sciences: A case of unrealized potential
MARK J. MARTINKO
1*, PAUL HARVEY
2* AND
MARIE T. DASBOROUGH
3*
1
College of Business, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, U.S.A.
2
Whittemore School of Business and Economics, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New
Hampshire, U.S.A.
3
School of Business, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, U.S.A.
Summary We argue that although attributional processes appear to affect virtually all goal and reward
oriented behavior in organizations, they have not received adequate attention in the organ-
izational sciences. In this Incubator, we encourage scholars to unlock the potential
of attribution theory to develop more complete explanations of organizational behavior.
Copyright # 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Introduction
Attribution processes have been underutilized in the organizational sciences, yet have tremendous
potential to explain a wide range of workplace behaviors. The validity of attribution theory and the
tools to measure attributional processes are well-documented and frequently used by social
psychologists (Martinko, Douglas, & Harvey, 2006). We suspect that the underutilization of attribution
theory in the organizational sciences may have originated from concerns raised in the early-1980s that
cast attribution theory in an overly negative light. In this Incubator, we address those concerns and
demonstrate that attributions are relevant to many organizational phenomena, with a particular
emphasis on attribution styles, which are stable and reliable predictors of human behavior (e.g.,
Martinko, Harvey, & Douglas, 2007).
Definition, Role, and Function of Attributions
When we refer to attribution theory we are referring to the work of Heider (1958), Kelley (1973), and
Weiner (1986), which defines attributions as individuals’ explanations for the causes of their successes
Journal of Organizational Behavior
J. Organiz. Behav. 32, 144–149 (2011)
Published online 25 August 2010 in Wiley Online Library
(wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/job.690
*Please address correspondence via email to any or all of the above authors at [email protected]; [email protected];
and [email protected]
Copyright # 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Received 22 January 2010
Accepted 25 January 2010
and failures. The basic premise is that people have an innate desire to understand the causes of
important outcomes in their lives and that their attributions influence their responses to these outcomes
(Heider, 1958). Typical attributional explanations for outcomes are ability, effort, the nature of the task,
and luck.
Attributions are individuals’ beliefs about the causes of their successes and failures (i.e., rewards
and punishments) and influence expectancies, emotions, and behaviors (Martinko et al., 2007).
Recognizing that behavior is influenced by rewards and punishments, as almost all organizational
scholars would agree, ...
TheIncubatorAttribution theory in the organizational.docxchristalgrieg
The
Incubator
Attribution theory in the organizational
sciences: A case of unrealized potential
MARK J. MARTINKO
1*, PAUL HARVEY
2* AND
MARIE T. DASBOROUGH
3*
1
College of Business, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, U.S.A.
2
Whittemore School of Business and Economics, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New
Hampshire, U.S.A.
3
School of Business, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, U.S.A.
Summary We argue that although attributional processes appear to affect virtually all goal and reward
oriented behavior in organizations, they have not received adequate attention in the organ-
izational sciences. In this Incubator, we encourage scholars to unlock the potential
of attribution theory to develop more complete explanations of organizational behavior.
Copyright # 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Introduction
Attribution processes have been underutilized in the organizational sciences, yet have tremendous
potential to explain a wide range of workplace behaviors. The validity of attribution theory and the
tools to measure attributional processes are well-documented and frequently used by social
psychologists (Martinko, Douglas, & Harvey, 2006). We suspect that the underutilization of attribution
theory in the organizational sciences may have originated from concerns raised in the early-1980s that
cast attribution theory in an overly negative light. In this Incubator, we address those concerns and
demonstrate that attributions are relevant to many organizational phenomena, with a particular
emphasis on attribution styles, which are stable and reliable predictors of human behavior (e.g.,
Martinko, Harvey, & Douglas, 2007).
Definition, Role, and Function of Attributions
When we refer to attribution theory we are referring to the work of Heider (1958), Kelley (1973), and
Weiner (1986), which defines attributions as individuals’ explanations for the causes of their successes
Journal of Organizational Behavior
J. Organiz. Behav. 32, 144–149 (2011)
Published online 25 August 2010 in Wiley Online Library
(wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/job.690
*Please address correspondence via email to any or all of the above authors at [email protected]; [email protected];
and [email protected]
Copyright # 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Received 22 January 2010
Accepted 25 January 2010
and failures. The basic premise is that people have an innate desire to understand the causes of
important outcomes in their lives and that their attributions influence their responses to these outcomes
(Heider, 1958). Typical attributional explanations for outcomes are ability, effort, the nature of the task,
and luck.
Attributions are individuals’ beliefs about the causes of their successes and failures (i.e., rewards
and punishments) and influence expectancies, emotions, and behaviors (Martinko et al., 2007).
Recognizing that behavior is influenced by rewards and punishments, as almost all organizational
scholars would agree, ...
Managerial psychology is a sub-discipline of industrial and organizational psychology, which focuses on the efficacy of individuals, groups and organizations in the workplace. It's purpose is to specifically aid managers in gaining a better understanding of the psychological patterns common among individuals and groups within any given organisation. Managerial psychology can be used to predict and prevent harmful psychological patterns within the workplace and can also be implemented to control psychological patterns among individuals and groups in a way that will benefit the organisation long term.
Running Head IndustrialOrganizational Psychology .docxinfantkimber
Running Head: Industrial/Organizational Psychology 1
Industrial/Organizational Psychology 7
Industrial/Organizational Psychology
Christina Washek
Dr. Michelle Vallie
PSYC 495
4 April 2020
Introduction
Organizational psychology is the usage of a person’s psychological knowledge to explain their work. The aim is to improve job satisfaction among the workers and to increase their productivity while ensuring that any issues in the organization are solved by promoting a healthy working environment. The issues in the organization are addressed using facts to ensure that the decisions made are beneficial to the involved parties.
Many aspects are considered in one’s working relationship that is from the employer’s point of view, the employee, and any external factors that enable work to be done in the organization. Therefore, psychology is a crucial subject as it benefits both the organization and individuals in the environment, ensuring that there is an optimal surrounding. The environment should be clear that productivity, efficiency, and the wellbeing of the employees are supported.
Organizational psychology covers a wide spectrum, which is from the time a person starts to work in the organization up to when they retire. The purpose of this essay is to analyze organizational psychology, the history, theories, and the relationship it has with other areas, among other considerations. Also, a study is done on how human resource management is incorporated into the organizational setup.
History of Organizational psychology
It is an academic discipline, and the area of practice has become more and more useful in the working life of individuals in organizations and creating a proper work environment. This is a field that involves the identification of issues in an organization, obtaining the effects, and finding solutions for the problems using data obtained for research. The main focus is on the attitude and behavior of individuals in the workplace. Some important outcomes that are required out of an employee from psychology are; understanding the attitude of the employee and controlling their behavior.
Organizational psychology is made up of two pillars. One of the pillars is fitting a man to the job, and the other is fitting the job to a man. The first pillar implies that an individual needs to attain the skills and knowledge required for the task in the organization while the second pillar implies that the job is designed in a way that the individual assigned the task can manage it without difficulties. The job can have tolls and equipment necessary to handle the task that cannot be handled by the use of hands.
Industrial and organizational psychology comes in from the fact that there was a need to understand individu ...
3.0 Project 2_ Developing My Brand Identity Kit.pptxtanyjahb
A personal brand exploration presentation summarizes an individual's unique qualities and goals, covering strengths, values, passions, and target audience. It helps individuals understand what makes them stand out, their desired image, and how they aim to achieve it.
Memorandum Of Association Constitution of Company.pptseri bangash
www.seribangash.com
A Memorandum of Association (MOA) is a legal document that outlines the fundamental principles and objectives upon which a company operates. It serves as the company's charter or constitution and defines the scope of its activities. Here's a detailed note on the MOA:
Contents of Memorandum of Association:
Name Clause: This clause states the name of the company, which should end with words like "Limited" or "Ltd." for a public limited company and "Private Limited" or "Pvt. Ltd." for a private limited company.
https://seribangash.com/article-of-association-is-legal-doc-of-company/
Registered Office Clause: It specifies the location where the company's registered office is situated. This office is where all official communications and notices are sent.
Objective Clause: This clause delineates the main objectives for which the company is formed. It's important to define these objectives clearly, as the company cannot undertake activities beyond those mentioned in this clause.
www.seribangash.com
Liability Clause: It outlines the extent of liability of the company's members. In the case of companies limited by shares, the liability of members is limited to the amount unpaid on their shares. For companies limited by guarantee, members' liability is limited to the amount they undertake to contribute if the company is wound up.
https://seribangash.com/promotors-is-person-conceived-formation-company/
Capital Clause: This clause specifies the authorized capital of the company, i.e., the maximum amount of share capital the company is authorized to issue. It also mentions the division of this capital into shares and their respective nominal value.
Association Clause: It simply states that the subscribers wish to form a company and agree to become members of it, in accordance with the terms of the MOA.
Importance of Memorandum of Association:
Legal Requirement: The MOA is a legal requirement for the formation of a company. It must be filed with the Registrar of Companies during the incorporation process.
Constitutional Document: It serves as the company's constitutional document, defining its scope, powers, and limitations.
Protection of Members: It protects the interests of the company's members by clearly defining the objectives and limiting their liability.
External Communication: It provides clarity to external parties, such as investors, creditors, and regulatory authorities, regarding the company's objectives and powers.
https://seribangash.com/difference-public-and-private-company-law/
Binding Authority: The company and its members are bound by the provisions of the MOA. Any action taken beyond its scope may be considered ultra vires (beyond the powers) of the company and therefore void.
Amendment of MOA:
While the MOA lays down the company's fundamental principles, it is not entirely immutable. It can be amended, but only under specific circumstances and in compliance with legal procedures. Amendments typically require shareholder
Kseniya Leshchenko: Shared development support service model as the way to ma...Lviv Startup Club
Kseniya Leshchenko: Shared development support service model as the way to make small projects with small budgets profitable for the company (UA)
Kyiv PMDay 2024 Summer
Website – www.pmday.org
Youtube – https://www.youtube.com/startuplviv
FB – https://www.facebook.com/pmdayconference
Implicitly or explicitly all competing businesses employ a strategy to select a mix
of marketing resources. Formulating such competitive strategies fundamentally
involves recognizing relationships between elements of the marketing mix (e.g.,
price and product quality), as well as assessing competitive and market conditions
(i.e., industry structure in the language of economics).
Putting the SPARK into Virtual Training.pptxCynthia Clay
This 60-minute webinar, sponsored by Adobe, was delivered for the Training Mag Network. It explored the five elements of SPARK: Storytelling, Purpose, Action, Relationships, and Kudos. Knowing how to tell a well-structured story is key to building long-term memory. Stating a clear purpose that doesn't take away from the discovery learning process is critical. Ensuring that people move from theory to practical application is imperative. Creating strong social learning is the key to commitment and engagement. Validating and affirming participants' comments is the way to create a positive learning environment.
Falcon stands out as a top-tier P2P Invoice Discounting platform in India, bridging esteemed blue-chip companies and eager investors. Our goal is to transform the investment landscape in India by establishing a comprehensive destination for borrowers and investors with diverse profiles and needs, all while minimizing risk. What sets Falcon apart is the elimination of intermediaries such as commercial banks and depository institutions, allowing investors to enjoy higher yields.
Digital Transformation and IT Strategy Toolkit and TemplatesAurelien Domont, MBA
This Digital Transformation and IT Strategy Toolkit was created by ex-McKinsey, Deloitte and BCG Management Consultants, after more than 5,000 hours of work. It is considered the world's best & most comprehensive Digital Transformation and IT Strategy Toolkit. It includes all the Frameworks, Best Practices & Templates required to successfully undertake the Digital Transformation of your organization and define a robust IT Strategy.
Editable Toolkit to help you reuse our content: 700 Powerpoint slides | 35 Excel sheets | 84 minutes of Video training
This PowerPoint presentation is only a small preview of our Toolkits. For more details, visit www.domontconsulting.com
Premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions for Modern BusinessesSynapseIndia
Stay ahead of the curve with our premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions. Our expert developers utilize MongoDB, Express.js, AngularJS, and Node.js to create modern and responsive web applications. Trust us for cutting-edge solutions that drive your business growth and success.
Know more: https://www.synapseindia.com/technology/mean-stack-development-company.html
Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey throu...dylandmeas
Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey through Full Sail University. Below, you’ll find a collection of my work showcasing my skills and expertise in digital marketing, event planning, and media production.
What is the TDS Return Filing Due Date for FY 2024-25.pdfseoforlegalpillers
It is crucial for the taxpayers to understand about the TDS Return Filing Due Date, so that they can fulfill your TDS obligations efficiently. Taxpayers can avoid penalties by sticking to the deadlines and by accurate filing of TDS. Timely filing of TDS will make sure about the availability of tax credits. You can also seek the professional guidance of experts like Legal Pillers for timely filing of the TDS Return.
What is the TDS Return Filing Due Date for FY 2024-25.pdf
Impact of organizational justice on organizational effectiveness
1. Industrial Engineering Letters www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-6096 (print) ISSN 2225-0581 (online)
Vol 1, No.3, 2011
Impact of Organizational Justice on Organizational
Effectiveness
Neetu Choudhry*, P. J. Philip, Rajender Kumar
Department of Humanities & Social Sciences, National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra-136119,
Haryana, India.
* E-mail of the corresponding author: neetu141@rediffmail.com
Abstract
The study of Organizational Justice has received great attention from the researchers and it has become
frequently topic in the field of industrial-organizational psychology. But, little research has tested the
fundamental assumption that organizational justice improves the effectiveness of organizations. This paper
examines that Organizational Justice improves the effectiveness of organizations by increasing job
satisfaction and organizational commitment. First, several theoretical explanations why Organizational
Justice (OJ) may improve organizational effectiveness are provided. Second, by distinguishing among the
two forms of Organizational Justice (Distributive and Procedural Justice). Then few existing studies applying
to organizational effectiveness contexts are summarized for supporting the relationship. This research paper
enhances the understanding of Organizational Justice of the employees in organizations. Finally, the
implications of these findings are discussed.
Keywords: Organizational effectiveness, Employees, Perception of Fairness, Behavior, Job Satisfaction.
1. Introduction
In an organization human resources find a key position in the priorities agenda of all concerns. Irrespective of
the sales volume, the budget or the manufacturing processes the central element which performs the work and
gives its final shape is the human resources. An employee at any position has some definite role to play
according to the job. The employee provides his services to the organization accordingly and delivers result.
But in unison it is very important to understand that an employee is not a machine which can be programmed
to be error free. The performance level of an employee is governed by many factors but organizational justice
is one of the important factors in the effective functioning of employees (Greenberg, 1990). Greenberg
(1987) suggested that employees are concerned about matters of justice and this justice influence job attitudes
like job satisfaction, organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. In essence,
Moorman (1991) who support the value of organizational justice is that if people believe they are treated
fairly, they will be more likely to hold positive attitude about their work, their work outcomes and their
supervisors. As evidence for the relationship among procedural, distributive and interactional justice and a
variety of organizational variables studied by Alexander and ruderman (1987), Folger & Konovosky (1989),
Fryxell and Gordon (1989). In recent review of theories of organizational justice, several researchers
predicted that, perception of justice may also promote effectiveness in organization by influencing an
individual employee’s job satisfaction and organizational commitment level.
1.1 Organizational Justice
Justice is one goal which is considered by human beings in ethical, political and social dimensions over the
years. Justice is among the most important conceptions which are explained in political and social subjects.
According to Plato, social organization which is civilization symbol will not exist without justice. Justice is
the center of attention of all humanistic affairs, because people are sensitive to how it is behaved towards
justice, deeply. In management, observing and making justice is one of the most important jobs of every
18
2. Industrial Engineering Letters www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-6096 (print) ISSN 2225-0581 (online)
Vol 1, No.3, 2011
manager and every human in each condition. When justice exists, all the works are done correctly, but
employee have to get their rights illegally if the justice does not exist. In fact, organizational justice is a kind
of fulfillment in all activities, behaviors and tendencies of organizational individuals. Organizational justice
is a basis for tactical thinking and value management and is also basis of all organizational values and
principles.
Organizational justice was developed by west scholars as one of the social justice dimensions in 1970s and
now is one of the new subjects related to organizational studies. Abraham Mazlo is one of the most
outstanding psychologists in the field of motivation, who set a sequence of human needs. Though, in his
sequence justice is not important, he was aware of its importance and was informed of injustice
consequences. According to Tasdan, organizational justice is related to staff perceptions of work fair. In fact,
he uses this phrase to explain and to analyze the role of fair at work place. Researchers have conceptualized
organizational justice mainly into two types: distributional and procedural justice (Moorman, 1991).
Distributive justice refers to the perceived fairness of the distribution of final outcomes (e.g. pay raises,
promotions, and selection for further studies/training) in an organization. Procedural justice refers to the
perceived fairness with which allocation decisions regarding the distribution of outcomes are made in an
organization.
1.1.1 Distributive Justice
Distributive justice assumes the fair distribution of organizational resources. It determines employees’
perceptions about payment, promotion and similar results. According to Homans (1961), distributive justice
is related specifically to the results of decisions on distribution. Approaches to distributive justice are
primarily related to structural causes. Structural causes are rules and environmental contexts in the decision
making process. Distributive justice is not related to very specific cases, although it is connected to resource
allocation and the results of resource allocation. Distributive justice is related to the perception held by an
employee after comparing his/her results with those of others. Organ (1988) stated that “distributive justice is
arguments on status, seniority, production, effort, needs and determination of payment”. In his explanation,
Organ suggested three rules of distribution. These rules are justice, equity and needs which can also be seen
as dimensions of distributive justice.
1.1.2 Procedural Justice
Procedural justice is the perception of justice in the decision-making process. This kind of justice is based on
the perception that the reasons for the decisions taken by the management are justified. The concept of
procedural justice hinges on an individual’s assessment about rightness or wrongness of procedures and
methods in decision making relevant to him or others.
Procedural justice is the perception of equity regarding rules and regulations applied in the process of
rewarding or punishing. Employees who have a sense of equity regarding the method tend to perceive
distribution of rewards and punishments as fair. Procedural justice is related to equity in procedures applied
in organizations and organizational procedures in decision-making. These procedures generally include
promotions; performance assessment, rewards and sharing other organizational opportunities the criteria
used for making decisions regarding organizational practices are related to this type of justice.
2. Organizational Justice (OJ) and Organizational Effectiveness
It is commonly believed that employees are the most important asset of an organization. This is because the
long-term viability and effectiveness of any organization critically depends on the skills, expertise,
competencies and proactive behaviors which include perception of justice (Organizational Justice) of
employees towards its management as well as organization. Organizational justice describes an individual’s
perception of fairness within organizational settings. The organizational justice literature
19
3. Industrial Engineering Letters www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-6096 (print) ISSN 2225-0581 (online)
Vol 1, No.3, 2011
proposes that employee perceptions about fairness in organizational procedures, outcomes, and interpersonal
exchanges may influence their work-related attitudes and behaviors, and how they react to the performance of
organizational activities (Greenberg and Tyler, 1987). Thus we expect not only organizational justice to
influence organizational effectiveness, but also organizational justice to moderate the relationship between
the human factor and organizational effectiveness. In the Critical review, Researchers found that although
over 160 studies have been reported on Organizational Justice (OJ), only five of them analyzed the impact of
OJ on Organizational Effectiveness (Cunha and Rego, 2008). In several studies from past decades, it is found
that there is a positive relationship between OJ and Organizational effectiveness. For example- Fryxell and
Gordon (1989) studied that there is positive relationship between Job Satisfaction and OJ, and satisfied
employees always show higher performance. In another study Lowe and Vodanovich (1995) examined the
affect of OJ dimensions on the satisfaction and organizational commitment of employees. In general, it has
been argued that organizational Justice may enhance organizational performance by lubricating the social
machinery of Organization. Table 1 summarizes some of the ways in which this may happen.
The general findings on organizational justice shows that while distributive justice is more strongly related to
personnel outcomes, procedural justice is more strongly related to organizational outcomes (Lind & Tyler,
1988). Employees are more likely to alter their behavior towards an organizational effectiveness if they
believe that the organization is fair or unfair in the allocation of resources as well as rewards rather than when
they believe that a decision outcome is fair or unfair. Thus perceptions of unfairness and fairness therefore
generate behaviors and attitudes that may have detrimental effects on organizational effectiveness. Social
exchange theory and the norm of reciprocity asserts that employee perform both their in-role and extra role
activities to reciprocate fair treatment they receive from organizational leaders by making the effort to
improve the effectiveness of the organization (Fryxell and Gordan, 1989). Thus, when employees perceive
that the procedures used to determine rewards are fair and consistent across the employee population, it
suggests to the employees that the organization values their welfare, and that will lead them to demonstrate
behaviors helpful to the achievement of the organization’s tactical goals and objectives. When employees
perceive an organization to be fair, they may react positively to the organization and would be more willing to
exercise their qualities to improve the organization’s effectiveness and performance. On the other hand, when
employees view an organization to be unfair in the way it treats them, they are more likely to react negatively
and exhibit behaviors and attitudes such as shirking, absenteeism, bribery, corruption, etc. Thus, employees
may exhibit strong It has been shown that individuals’ perception of “justice from and relationships with
organizations are associated with outcomes relevant to the organization”.
3. Evidence of the Impact of OJs on Organizational Effectiveness
Very few studies in which OJ (Organizational Justice) contribute to the effectiveness of organization has
been tested empirically. There is not even a single study which shows the relationship between OJ and
organizational effectiveness. Table 2 shows the summary of results across studies, in which relationship
between Organizational Justice dimensions (Procedural and Distributive Justice) and other variables like Job
satisfaction, organizational commitment, normative commitment, management satisfaction and overall
satisfaction have been studied. These variables have indirect and direct relationship with organizational
effectiveness (Ruderman, 1987; Fryxell & Gordon, 1989; Folger & Konovsky, 1989; McFarlin & Sweeney,
1992; Lowe & Vodaanovice, 1995).
In the first study, Fryxell and Gordan (1989) examined the relation between management satisfactions and
organizational justice of three different samples. In first sample, Respondents included member and
nonmembers of five public-sector unions’ members. The second sample was comprised of members of a
private-sector, industrial union, and the third sample was comprised of member and nonmembers of a
public-sector union representing employees. Authors used satisfaction with management as criteria as
predictors of perception of justice in organization. Table 2 reports the regression coefficient of this model
for the three samples. Result shows that overall satisfaction with a job had greater effects in predicting
satisfaction with management. In both cases (PJ & DJ) there is a strong relationship between OJ and Job
satisfaction. In the second study, McFarlin & Sweeney (1992) examined the 675 employees of Midwestern
20
4. Industrial Engineering Letters www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-6096 (print) ISSN 2225-0581 (online)
Vol 1, No.3, 2011
banks from USA that how procedural and distributive justice effects the personnel (job satisfaction) and
organizational outcomes (organizational commitment). Study found that Distributive Justice was more
important predictor of organizational outcome (organizational commitment) as compared to procedural
justice and for personnel outcome (Job satisfaction) reverse was true. However, procedural and distributive
justice also interacted in predicting organizational outcomes. In the third study, Moorman, Niehoff and Organ
(1993) measured the relative contribution of perceptions of procedural justice towards predicting Job
satisfaction controlling for the effects of OCB and organizational commitment of 1500 employees in a
national cable television company. Results indicated support for the relationship between procedural justice
and organizational commitment.
In the final study, Lowe and Vodanovich (1995) examined the effect of distributive and procedural factors on
the satisfaction and organizational commitment of university administrative and support personnel (N=138)
were examined. As in table, result showed that distributive justice was stronger predictor of satisfaction and
commitment than were aspects of procedural justice. So, it can be concluded that the relative importance of
distributive and procedural justice may vary across time or may be employees using an inductive process in
assessing organizational outcomes but it has been proved from past studies that both the variables affect
organizational effectiveness, sometimes procedural justice matters more and in others issues distributive
justice. So Organizational Justice makes a foundation for employees to think better for their organizations.
4. Limitation and Direction for Future Research
Employees usually give different preference for giving different perception of justice for organizations. The
result raises important questions about how OCB and OJ are measured. This study examined the facets of
work place justice as predictor of organizational effectiveness. Despite the contribution by various past
studies, this study has some limitation. One of the most basic limitation of the present study is that most of the
studies reviewed are based upon cross sectional, self reported data. This reliance precludes us from making
strong statements about our results. Second limitation of the study is that, possibly more effective
organizations’ employees are more positive while describing Organizational Justice. A related explanation is
the halo effect. Another limitation of the study is that all studies employees’ attitude and job definitions were
assessed through self reports, which creates the potential for common method bias.
Obvious sources for future researches are those questions that remain unanswered in present research.
Although there are doubtlessly many of these, too many to identify here, we select the few questions that
seem first targets for future research into impact of Organizational Justice on organizational effectiveness.
First suggestion arises due to imbalance of the studies on the present topic. Very few studies are present
which shows the relation between OJ and organizational effectiveness because greater concern has been paid
to the antecedents of the justice than to the consequences. So, research should be done on these aspects,
besides this second direction for future research would be to employ longitudinal designs to investigate these
effects in the present study. Unfortunately, circumstances limited the present study to cross- sectional design.
Third direction for future would be to determine whether personnel and organizational outcomes other than
present here in study will give same pattern of results for procedural and distributive justice. These are all
interesting possibilities that should be investigated in future.
5. Conclusion
It is commonly believed that employees are the most important asset of an organization. This is because the
long-term viability and effectiveness of any organization critically depends on the skills, expertise,
competencies and proactive behaviors which include perception of justice (Organizational Justice).
Greenberg (1987) suggested that effective organizations depend on employees’ performance which is
directly affected by individual job satisfaction at workplace and their commitment towards organization. The
results of present study suggest that the use of fair treatment and fair procedures may be a key antecedent to
promoting organizational effectiveness. Fairness invokes moral obligation that go beyond affective response.
And this study’s results show the same. So, Organizations should encourage their managers to support
21
5. Industrial Engineering Letters www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-6096 (print) ISSN 2225-0581 (online)
Vol 1, No.3, 2011
workplace fairness. By discussing the implications of decisions with employees and treating them fairly, one
can increase the justice level of organizational high that enriches the performance potential of a department or
organization.
References
Alexander, S., & Ruderman, M. (1987), “The role of Procedural and Distributive justice in Organizational
Behavior,” Social Justice Research, 1(2), 177-197.
Bateman, T.S., & Organ, D.W. (1983), “Job Satisfaction and the Good Soldier: The Relationship between
Affect and Employee Citizenship,” Academy of Management Journal, 26, 588- 595.
Blakely, L.G., Moorman, H. R., & Niehoff, P. B. (1998) “Does perceived organizational support mediate
the relationship between procedural Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior,” Academy of
Management Journal, 41(3), 351-357.
Cunha, E. P. M., & Rego, A. (2008), “OCB and Effectiveness: An empirical study in two small insurance
companies,” The Service Industrial Journal, 28(4), 541-554.
Farh, Jiing-Lih., Podsakoff, M. P., & Organ,.W. D. (1990) “Accounting for Organizational Citizenship
Behavior: Leader fairness and task scope versus satisfaction,” Journal of Management, 16(4), 705-721.
Folger, R., & Konovsky, A. M. (1989) “Effects of Procedural justice and Distributive Justice on reaction to
Pay raise Decision,” Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 115-130.
Fryxell, E.G., & Gordon, E.M. (1989) “Work place Justice and Job Satisfaction as predictor of satisfaction
with Union and Management,” Academy of Management Journal, 32(4), 851-866.
Greenberg, J. (1986), “Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluation,” Journal of Applied
Psychology, 71(2), 340-342.
Greenberg, J., & Tyler. R. T. (1987), “Why Procedural Justice in Organizations? ,” Social Justice Research,
1(2), 127-142.
Greenberg, J. (1998), “Cultivating an image of justice: Looking fair on the Job,” Academy of Management
executive, 2(2), 155-158.
Lewicki, J. R., & Sheppard, H. B. (1987), “Towards general principle of Fairness,” Social Justice Research,
1(2), 161-176.
Lind, A. E., Thiabaut. J., & Walker, L. (1979), “The relation between Procedural and Distributive Justice,”
Virginia Law Review, 65(8), 1401-1421.
Lowe, H. R.,& Vodanovich, J. S. (1995), “A field study of distributive and Procedural Justice as predictors
of satisfaction and organizational commitment,” Journal of Business and Psychology, 10(1), 99-114.
Mackenzie, B. S., & Podsakoff, M. P. (1997), “Impact of OCB on Organizational performance: A review and
suggestion for future research,” Human Performance, 10(2), 133-151.
McFarlin, B. D., & Sweeney, D .P. (1992), “Distributive and Procedural Justice as predictors of satisfaction
with personal and organizational outcomes,” Academy of Management journal, 35(3), 626-637.
Moorman, H. R. (1991) Relationship between Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Organizational
Justice: Do fairness perception influence employee citizenship?, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6),
845-855.
Moorman, H. R., Niehoff, P.B., & Organ .W. D. (1993), “Treating employee fairly and Organizational
Citizenship Behavior: Sorting the Effect of Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, Procedural
justice,” Employee Responsibility and Right Journal, 6, 209-225.
Niehoff, P. B., & Moorman, H. R. (1993), “Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of
monitoring and Organizational Citizenship Behavior,” Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 527-556.
22
6. Industrial Engineering Letters www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-6096 (print) ISSN 2225-0581 (online)
Vol 1, No.3, 2011
Table 1 : Summary of Reasons why Organizational Justice might influence Organizational
effectiveness
Reasons why OJ influence Org.
Examples
Effectiveness.
1.OJ may enhance employee -Employee may feel more
satisfied in terms of
productivity pay, promotion,
rewards (Distributive Justice)
and satisfied
employees help each other and
make org.
environment more suitable more
productive.
2.OJ may enhance managerial -Fair and Open procedures for
employees
Productivity procedural Justice)
led to less crisis mgmt.
3.OJ may enhance -Healthy and sporting
procedures can attract
Organizational environment other good employees and
also help in retaining
them.
-Better
environment better performance of Org.
4. OJ may enhance team Spirit -Unbiased behavior of
supervisors (Interactional
And Coordination Justice) which will
enhance coordination and
Team spirit
among employees.
5.OJ may enhance -Distributive, Procedural
and interactional justice
Organizational performance helps the organization to
give better
Performance.
23
7. Industrial Engineering Letters www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-6096 (print) ISSN 2225-0581 (online)
Vol 1, No.3, 2011
-More job
satisfied and committed employee
Lead to
greater productivity of organization.
Table 2: Summary of Results across Studies
Fryxell & McFarlin & Moorman,
Niehoff Lowe &
Gordan (1989) Sweeney (1992) & Organ (1993)
Vodaanovice(1995)
Description S1 S2 S3 JS OC AC
CC OS NC
(Job Satisfaction)
Procedural .52** .16** .62** .18*** .34*** .50** .09*
.48*** .53**
Justice
Distributive .15* .30** .22* .30*** .23*** -- --
.80** .63**
Justice
Here S1, S2, S3 stand for sample 1, 2 and 3, JS= Job Satisfaction, OC= Organizational commitment, AC=
Affective commitment, CC= Continuance commitment, OS= Overall satisfaction, NC= Normative
Commitment, *p<.05 **p < .001 ***p < .0001
24