Bhawanipatna Call Girls 📞9332606886 Call Girls in Bhawanipatna Escorts servic...
IHC in breast CA
1. Defining the clinical challenges – Pitfalls ofDefining the clinical challenges – Pitfalls of
IHC testing in Breast cancerIHC testing in Breast cancer
Dr. Ashutosh Mukherji
Associate Professor,
Department of Radiotherapy,
Regional Cancer Centre, JIPMER
2. • Histologic subtype
• Axillary lymph node status
• Tumor size
• Grade
• Age
• Comorbidities
5. Breast Cancer Subtypes
• Breast cancer is classified into clinical subtypes
based upon receptor expression
• These subtypes dictate possible therapeutic
options and vary in their prognosis
– Luminal: derived from the luminal cells
• TYPE A:ER+, PR+,HER-2-
• TYPE B:ER+,PR+,HER-2+
• Can use hormonal therapy
• Less aggressive
– Basal: derived from myoepithelial cells
• ER-, PR-,HER-2-,ck 5/6+ or HER -1+
• No specific target for therapies
• More aggressive
– HER2-enriched
• More aggressive
Luminal A
Luminal B
Claudin-Low
HER2-enriched
Basal
6. Luminal and Basal Characteristics
Basal
• Low ER
• Low HER2
• High CK5/6
• c-KIT higher
• High EGFR
• High p53 mutation
• High p53 protein
• High cyclin E
• Very high
vimentin
Luminal
• High ER
• Higher HER2
• Low CK5/6
• Low c-KIT
• Low EGFR
• Low p53 mutation
• Low p53 protein
• Low cyclin E
• Low vimentin
Basement
membrane
Myoepithelial Cells
Basal
Luminal Cells
Luminal
7. ER Receptors
• Weak prognostic marker for clinical outcome
• Strong marker for tamoxifen response
• Results can be affected by method of processing (tissue
fixation/ choice of antibody / interpretation of results)
• Alred scoring important
• Score of more than or equal to 3 means atleast 1% cells
expressing – puts result in St Gallen uncertain group where
hormone therapy may / may not help.
7
8. HER 2 NEU
• Positive result means more than 6 copies per tumour cell or a HER2 /
Chromosome 17 ratio of 1.8 – 2.2
• Positive in 15-30% cases of breast carcinoma
• Associated with increase disease recurrence and poor prognosis
• expression of HER2 is regulated by signaling through estrogen receptors.
• Normally tamoxifen down regulate HER2
8
9. Role of Ki67
• Prognostic indicator for high risk patients; indicates cellular
proliferation
• helps decide on whether to add chemo to endocrine therapy
9
15. Levels of Gene Expression Determine
Recurrence Score
21-gene assay = 16 outcome-related genes + 5 reference genes
Higher expression levels of
“favorable” genes = ↓ RS
Higher expression levels of
“unfavorable” genes = ↑ RS
A risk score is calculated from 0 -100
Cutoff points chosen based on
Results of NSABP trial B-20
16. Targeted therapy
ER + ER-
Hormonal Herceptin EGFR BRCA 1 C-kit
Therapy Geftinib, erlotinib, DNA damage Imatinib
lapatinib PARP inh
Luminal A Luminal B HER 2 +
Basal Like
17. Predictive relevance of molecular
classification
Goldhirsch et al. Ann Oncol June 2011. St Gallen 2011
18. NCCN guidelines include Oncotype DX®
testing in the
treatment-decision pathway for node-negative and
micrometastatic disease
18
• Tumor 0.6-1.0 cm,
moderately or
poorly
differentiated,
intermediate or
high grade, or
vascular invasion
• Tumor > 1 cm with
favorable or
unfavorable
pathologic
features
Consider
Oncotyp
e DX
Hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative
disease
pT1, pT2, or pT3 and pN1mi
No test
RS <
18
RS 18-
30
RS ≥
31
Adjuvant endocrine
therapy
± adjuvant chemotherapy
Adjuvant endocrine
therapy
endocrine therapy
± adjuvant chemotherapy
Adjuvant endocrine
therapy
+ adjuvant chemotherapy
Main point: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Practice Guidelines in Oncology for breast cancer suggests the use of Oncotype DX® in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative or micrometastasis-involved disease.
The option of using a gene-based assay of tumor tissue, namely the Oncotype DX assay, to help guide chemotherapy treatment decisions is now included within the systemic adjuvant treatment decision pathway for patients with node-negative or pN1mi (micrometastasis: 0.2-2.0 mm), hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative tumors that are 0.6-1.0 cm and moderately/poorly differentiated or with unfavorable features or tumors that are &gt; 1 cm.
Category 2B: The recommendation is based on lower level evidence, and there is nonuniform NCCN consensus (but no major disagreement).
http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/categories_of_consensus.asp
National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. Available at: http://www.nccn.org. Accessed [Apr 27, 2009].