An analytical paper, prepared by IFES in cooperation with Center of Policy and Legal Reform, Chesno Civic Movement and the Committee of Voters of Ukraine.
The adoption of the 2015 Political Finance Reform Law has proven to be a significant step towards effective regulation of the role of money in Ukrainian politics. The Law was the result of concerted efforts by members of Ukraine’s parliament, civil society organizations, international organizations and experts.
Asian Election Stakeholder Forum III (AESF III)
August 22 – 26, 2016
Bali, Indonesia
"Transparency & integrity for Quality Elections"
General Election Commission Republic of Indonesia
and
General Election Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL)
Asian Election Stakeholder Forum III (AESF III)
August 22 – 26, 2016
Bali, Indonesia
"Transparency & integrity for Quality Elections"
General Election Commission Republic of Indonesia
and
General Election Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL)
Asian Election Stakeholder Forum III (AESF III)
August 22 – 26, 2016
Bali, Indonesia
"Transparency & integrity for Quality Elections"
General Election Commission Republic of Indonesia
and
General Election Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL)
Asian Election Stakeholder Forum III (AESF III)
August 22 – 26, 2016
Bali, Indonesia
"Transparency & integrity for Quality Elections"
General Election Commission Republic of Indonesia
and
General Election Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL)
The adoption of the 2015 Political Finance Reform Law has proven to be a significant step towards effective regulation of the role of money in Ukrainian politics. The Law was the result of concerted efforts by members of Ukraine’s parliament, civil society organizations, international organizations and experts.
Asian Election Stakeholder Forum III (AESF III)
August 22 – 26, 2016
Bali, Indonesia
"Transparency & integrity for Quality Elections"
General Election Commission Republic of Indonesia
and
General Election Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL)
Asian Election Stakeholder Forum III (AESF III)
August 22 – 26, 2016
Bali, Indonesia
"Transparency & integrity for Quality Elections"
General Election Commission Republic of Indonesia
and
General Election Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL)
Asian Election Stakeholder Forum III (AESF III)
August 22 – 26, 2016
Bali, Indonesia
"Transparency & integrity for Quality Elections"
General Election Commission Republic of Indonesia
and
General Election Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL)
Asian Election Stakeholder Forum III (AESF III)
August 22 – 26, 2016
Bali, Indonesia
"Transparency & integrity for Quality Elections"
General Election Commission Republic of Indonesia
and
General Election Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL)
Asian Election Stakeholder Forum III (AESF III)
August 22 – 26, 2016
Bali, Indonesia
"Transparency & integrity for Quality Elections"
General Election Commission Republic of Indonesia
and
General Election Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL)
Implementation of the Uniform Information Practices ActRyan Ozawa
Hawaii Governor David Ige: "Effective citizen participation in state government requires timely access to information and appropriate opportunities for the public to provide its government with feedback and ideas. As part of this effort, I have already asked executive branch departments and agencies (“executive agencies”) to be accessible, hold community meetings throughout Hawaii, and work toward increasing community involvement in government affairs, including considering input from the public in decision-making."
The financial viability of the civil society sector improved slightly due to growth in crowdfunding; funding through the 2 percent Law; and the development of social entrepreneurship. Sectoral infrastructure strengthened with increased sub-granting and the growth of intersectoral partnerships. At the same time, the public image of Civil Society Organisations (CSO) worsened slightly as government propaganda continued to be used to attack them. These are some of the conclusions of the CSO Sustainability Index for 2018, an annual analytical instrument that evaluates the strength and sustainability of the CSO sector in 71 countries from Asia, Eastern and Central Europe, Eurasia, Sub-Saharan Africa, Middle East and North Africa.
Election Day Voter Registration in New Mexicocoryhelene
Report authors R. Michael Alvarez and Jonathan Nagler have analyzed the likely impact on voter turnout should New Mexico adopt Same Day Registration (SDR). Under the system proposed in New Mexico, eligible voters who miss the current 28-day deadline for registering by mail may be able to register to vote during the state's early voting period. The availability of Same Day Registration procedures should give voters who have not previously registered the opportunity to vote.
Getting rid of pork barrels and other political bribesradaprogram
Ivan Sikora: “Our efforts aimed at reducing a share of politically motivated
budget decisions and preventing risks of political corruption in activities of the
Members of Parliament. It is completely realistic to stop pork barrel practices,
if we cooperate within the Agenda of MPs without Political Corruption Risks
Partnership.”
In spite of the impressive economic growth recorded in the first decade of the 2000s, Ukraine is not considered a business-friendly country. This is reflected, for example, in the Heritage Foundation Index of Economic Freedom, which ranked Ukraine 125th in its 2007 rankings (out of 157 countries), and placed it in the category of “mostly unfree” economies, behind most other CIS countries. Scores in the categories of “Fiscal Freedom” and “Trade Freedom” were above the world average. However, in categories such as “Freedom from Corruption,” “Property Rights,” and “Investment Freedom,” Ukraine’s record looks dismal.
Authored by: Marek Dąbrowski
Published in 2007
The Congress of the People wants to highlight a fundamental matter of national importance and calls for urgent action to be implemented to realise the Freedom Charter vision that "The People Shall Govern".
The report highlights the issues on the political parties willingness to implement a new law on the political parties financing; comprehensiveness of relevant legislation; the political parties statements on property, income, expenses and financial obligations for the first, second and third quarters of 2016; the reports form and quality; powers of the NAPC and other supervisory bodies and their interactions concerning the political party financing; applying sanctions for violations of the law on the political parties fin ancing.
Asian Election Stakeholder Forum III (AESF III)
August 22 – 26, 2016
Bali, Indonesia
"Transparency & integrity for Quality Elections"
General Election Commission Republic of Indonesia
and
General Election Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL)
Implementation of the Uniform Information Practices ActRyan Ozawa
Hawaii Governor David Ige: "Effective citizen participation in state government requires timely access to information and appropriate opportunities for the public to provide its government with feedback and ideas. As part of this effort, I have already asked executive branch departments and agencies (“executive agencies”) to be accessible, hold community meetings throughout Hawaii, and work toward increasing community involvement in government affairs, including considering input from the public in decision-making."
The financial viability of the civil society sector improved slightly due to growth in crowdfunding; funding through the 2 percent Law; and the development of social entrepreneurship. Sectoral infrastructure strengthened with increased sub-granting and the growth of intersectoral partnerships. At the same time, the public image of Civil Society Organisations (CSO) worsened slightly as government propaganda continued to be used to attack them. These are some of the conclusions of the CSO Sustainability Index for 2018, an annual analytical instrument that evaluates the strength and sustainability of the CSO sector in 71 countries from Asia, Eastern and Central Europe, Eurasia, Sub-Saharan Africa, Middle East and North Africa.
Election Day Voter Registration in New Mexicocoryhelene
Report authors R. Michael Alvarez and Jonathan Nagler have analyzed the likely impact on voter turnout should New Mexico adopt Same Day Registration (SDR). Under the system proposed in New Mexico, eligible voters who miss the current 28-day deadline for registering by mail may be able to register to vote during the state's early voting period. The availability of Same Day Registration procedures should give voters who have not previously registered the opportunity to vote.
Getting rid of pork barrels and other political bribesradaprogram
Ivan Sikora: “Our efforts aimed at reducing a share of politically motivated
budget decisions and preventing risks of political corruption in activities of the
Members of Parliament. It is completely realistic to stop pork barrel practices,
if we cooperate within the Agenda of MPs without Political Corruption Risks
Partnership.”
In spite of the impressive economic growth recorded in the first decade of the 2000s, Ukraine is not considered a business-friendly country. This is reflected, for example, in the Heritage Foundation Index of Economic Freedom, which ranked Ukraine 125th in its 2007 rankings (out of 157 countries), and placed it in the category of “mostly unfree” economies, behind most other CIS countries. Scores in the categories of “Fiscal Freedom” and “Trade Freedom” were above the world average. However, in categories such as “Freedom from Corruption,” “Property Rights,” and “Investment Freedom,” Ukraine’s record looks dismal.
Authored by: Marek Dąbrowski
Published in 2007
The Congress of the People wants to highlight a fundamental matter of national importance and calls for urgent action to be implemented to realise the Freedom Charter vision that "The People Shall Govern".
The report highlights the issues on the political parties willingness to implement a new law on the political parties financing; comprehensiveness of relevant legislation; the political parties statements on property, income, expenses and financial obligations for the first, second and third quarters of 2016; the reports form and quality; powers of the NAPC and other supervisory bodies and their interactions concerning the political party financing; applying sanctions for violations of the law on the political parties fin ancing.
This presentation by Gary Pienaar (www.idasa.org) was given at a Transparency International conference –
Zimbabwe workshop on Political Finance in the SADC Region - the South African Experience.
August 2009
See more at www.idasa.org
What Every Ohio School Leader Should Know About Advocacy and the Legislative ...Craig Eric Burford
This presentation provides an overview of the political context in Ohio and the knowledge school leaders need to effectively navigate the state legislative and budget processes.
Підсумки проекту «Посилення ролі громадянського суспільства у забезпеченні демократичних реформ і якості державної влади», що реалізувався ЦППР за підтримки Європейського Союзу протягом 1 жовтня 2017 року – 30 вересня 2019 року.
The purpose of this article is to present tools and means that enable the execution of the management of internal accounting control, mutually, between parts of the same sphere of government, with the work being carried out by accounting professionals themselves, both from distinct and similar organizations, Not with the function of punishing or policing, but rather of providing through this experience, efficiency and effectiveness in the conduct of public affairs
The monthly information bulletin of the Centre of Policy and Legal Reform (CPLR) is dedicated to the analysis of state reforms,
in particular in the areas of parliamentarianism and elections, constitutional and judicial reforms, civil service, anticorruption,
etc. The goal of the publication is to increase the level of expert awareness among the citizens and to strengthen their
capacity to influence the government authorities in order to expedite democratic reforms and to establish good governance
in Ukraine.
Supreme Court issues notice to Centre, Election Commission about making polit...Newslaundry
The petition, which was filed by Association of Democratic Reforms [ADR] and Centre for Public Interest Litigation [CPIL], challenges various amendments made through Finance Act 2017 and Finance Act 2016 in Companies Act, Income Tax Act, Representation of People’s Act, Reserve Bank of India Act and Foreign Contribution Regulations Act.
The monthly newsletter of the Centre of Policy and Legal Reform is devoted to the analysis of the state reform, in particular in the areas of parliamentarism and elections, constitutional and judicial reform, civil service, anti-corruption, etc.
The purpose of the publication is to raise the awareness among citizens and to strengthen their ability to influence the state authorities in order to accelerate democratic reforms and establish proper governance in Ukraine.
If you want to receive the monthly newsletter by mail, please send an e-mail to busol@pravo.org.ua (Yaryna Busol, communications manager of the CPLR).
The monthly information bulletin of the Centre of Policy and Legal Reform (CPLR) is dedicated to the analysis of state reforms, in particular in the areas of parliamentarianism and elections, constitutional and judicial reforms, civil service, anticorruption, etc. The goal of the publication is to increase the level of expert awareness among the citizens and to strengthen their
capacity to influence the government authorities in order to expedite democratic reforms and to establish good governance
in Ukraine.
Similar to Key Political Finance Reform Priorities (20)
В аналітичному звіті проаналізовано виклики, пов'язані з питаннями дисциплінарної відповідальності суддів, та запропоновано низку заходів для їх усунення
The White Paper proposes ways to improve the preparation of draft laws by the subjects of legislative initiative and the plan of legislative work of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, improvement of the examination of draft legal acts, approaches to the formation of committees and enhancement of their role in the legislative process, the procedure for consideration and adoption of draft acts by the Parliament, proposals to overcome the so-called legislative spam, monitoring the implementation of laws, and the need to determine the specifics of the legislative process under the martial law regime
The object of this study is the decisions of the High Anti-Corruption Court and courts of general jurisdiction in criminal proceedings on corruption and corruption-related criminal offenses, and its subject is the general trends in the practice of applying the provisions of criminal and criminal procedural legislation in proceedings on corruption and corruption-related criminal offenses.
This study proposes to use the example of judicial reform to find a balance of flexibility and clarity to improve the effectiveness of Ukraine’s accession negotiations. This paper proposes a methodological approach to address these challenges, focusing on a normative and empirical analysis of the judiciary in Ukraine and offering policy recommendations that are appropriate for different stages of the negotiation process.
The White Paper contains an action plan to address the problematic issues of post-war elections and recommendations for the parties involved in the electoral process. Among other things, the recommendations will contain a list of proposed solutions to the most pressing problems that should be resolved before the election process is announced, with arguments for the necessary time frame for their implementation.
The discussions were conducted by the Center for Political and Legal Reforms, the International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES) in Ukraine, the Civil Network OPORA and the All-Ukrainian Initiative "Active Community" from the Institute "Respublica" with the support of the National Democratic Institute (NDI), the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Global Affairs Canada and British aid from the UK Government.
Center for Policy and Legal Reform has translated the OECD study "The Role and Functions of the Center of Government in the Eastern Partnership Region of the European Neighborhood Policy". The translation was carried out within the framework of the USAID RADA: The Next Generation". The study focuses on the role and functioning of the center of government in the Eastern Partnership countries.
This report presents empirical data on the work of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine in the period from February 2022 to June 2023 (some statistical indicators are displayed as of April or May 2023). The authors focused specifically on the legislative function, because it was the main activity of the Parliament during the analyzed time period.
У Звіті представлені емпіричні дані щодо роботи Верховної Ради України у період з лютого 2022 року до червня 2023 року (окремі статистичні показники відображено станом на квітень та травень 2023 року). Автори сконцентрувалися саме на законодавчій функції, адже вона була основною в діяльності парламенту протягом аналізованого періоду часу.
The book defines the concepts of oligarchs, de-oligarchization and their peculiarities in Ukraine, examines the causes and conditions of the emergence of oligarchs in Ukraine, critically analyzes the anti-oligarchic legislation of Ukraine, in particular in comparison with the relevant acts of some other states, and outlines the peculiarities of its implementation and other anti-oligarchic measures of the state.
The author provides conclusions and recommendations that can be used in further implementation of the de-oligarchization policy by representatives of the state authorities (in particular, the President of Ukraine, members of the Parliament of Ukraine, members of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine, officials of the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine, the National Bank of Ukraine, the National Energy and Utilities Regulatory Commission, the State Property Fund of Ukraine, prosecutors and law enforcement agencies, and judges of the High Anti-Corruption Court).
This publication provides information on the steps needed in the area of state policy aimed at depoliticizing prosecutorial and law enforcement agencies, particularly by introducing competitive principles for the appointment of the Prosecutor General and leaders of law enforcement agencies, based on the practices of the EU states and the United Kingdom.
The publication is intended for a wide range of legal professionals, scholars, employees of prosecutor’s offices and law enforcement agencies, as well as anyone interested in the reform of law and order system in Ukraine.
The publication contains information on the necessary steps in the field of public policy to depoliticize prosecution and law enforcement agencies in terms of introducing competitive principles for the appointment of the Prosecutor General and heads of law enforcement agencies based on the experience of the EU and the United Kingdom. The publication is intended for a wide range of lawyers, academics, prosecutors, law enforcement officials and anyone interested in reforming the law enforcement system in Ukraine.
The book defines the concepts of oligarchs, de-oligarchization and their peculiarities in Ukraine, examines the causes and conditions of the emergence of oligarchs in Ukraine, critically analyzes the anti-oligarchic legislation of Ukraine, in particular in comparison with the relevant acts of some other states, and outlines the peculiarities of its implementation and other anti-oligarchic measures of the state.
The White Paper on the Legislative Process is an analytical document prepared by the experts of the Centre of Policy and Legal Reform, which proposes ways and means to solve the problems of the legislative process in Ukraine, summarized in the Green Paper. The draft White Paper was developed within the framework of the Next Generation Rada (RANG) project.
A joint study by the Democracy Reporting International, Reanimation Package of Reforms Coalition and Center of Policy and Legal Reform of the functioning of Ukraine's democratic institutions during the war
Спільне дослідження Центру політико-правових реформ, Коаліції Реанімаційний Пакет Реформ та Democracy Reporting International стосовно функціонування демократичних інститутів України під час війни
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
1. Key Political Finance Reform Priorities Page 1 out of 7
Key Political Finance Reform Priorities
Background
On October 8, 2015, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine adopted the Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to
Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine on the Prevention and Counteraction of Political Corruption”
(hereinafter – the Political Finance Reform Law), which launched political finance reform in Ukraine.
This was the result of coordinated efforts of various stakeholders in Ukraine, including members of
parliament, civil society and national experts, and was positively assessed by international
organizations, such as the Group of States against Corruption (GRECO), the Council of Europe’s Venice
Commission and the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights of the Organization for
Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE/ODIHR). The Political Finance Reform Law introduced new
political finance rules for political parties and candidates in elections, including public funding for
political parties, establishing limits on donations to political parties and candidates, determining
financial reporting requirements for political parties, and strengthening public oversight of political
finance.
Since the adoption of the Political Finance Reform Law, significant progress has been made to increase
political finance transparency by obliging political parties to submit quarterly financial reports. The
National Agency for Prevention of Corruption (NAPC) plays an important role in the implementation
of the Political Finance Reform Law and is tasked to analyze financial reports of political parties and
perform oversight functions. The NAPC made some progress in analyzing financial reports of political
parties and documenting political finance violations.
However, in the run-up to the 2019 presidential and parliamentary elections, the regulator faced
numerous significant challenges in: countering shadow funding of political parties; verifying the data
reflected in financial reports of political parties and candidates against their actual incomes and
expenditures; preventing funding of campaigns by entities who are not eligible to make donations;
combating excessive dependence of political parties and candidates on big corporate donors; and in
reducing the overall cost of election campaigns. In the period between 2017–2019, unfortunately, the
quality of the NAPC’s performance decreased and its political independence was compromised. This
resulted in the inability of the NAPC to address the above-mentioned challenges effectively and even
led to some deterioration in the reform implementation process.
The degradation of the NAPC’s institutional capacity resulted in calls to replace its management and
improve its internal structure. On October 2, 2019, following the snap parliamentary election, the Law
of Ukraine “On Amending Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine to Guarantee Effectiveness of the
Institutional Mechanism of Corruption Prevention” was adopted, which laid the foundation for the
renewal of the leadership of the anti-corruption body by selecting a new Head of the NAPC through
an open competition, involving Ukrainian and international anti-corruption experts. The competition
was held in late 2019, and the Cabinet of Ministers appointed the new NAPC Chair on January 15,
2020.
The reboot of the NAPC actualizes the need to identify key priorities of political finance reform in
Ukraine. This document presents an analysis of the key barriers for an effective implementation of
2. Key Political Finance Reform Priorities Page 2 out of 7
political finance reform and outlines measures needed to remove these barriers. The recommended
steps are addressed mostly to the renewed NAPC, but other stakeholders, including the Central
Election Commission (CEC), the Verkhovna Rada, political parties, non-governmental organizations
and the media, should also play important roles.
Key Political Finance Priorities
Political finance reform in Ukraine aims to increase transparency of political finance and decrease the
dependence of parties and candidates on big corporate donors. To reach these goals, both legal
reforms and better compliance with and enforcement of political finance rules are required.
Legal reforms
Although the current legislation regulating political finance is quite progressive, many gaps and
shortcomings have been identified over the past few years and need to be addressed. Ukrainian and
international observers have repeatedly reiterated the need to introduce amendments to the current
political finance legislation. The main drawbacks of the political finance legislation include the
following:
• Unreasonably high limits on donations to political parties by individuals and companies and the
lack of any correlation between the amount of donation and the level of a donor’s income;
• Lack of proper regulation of third-party expenditures in favor of political parties and candidates
and in-kind donations;
• An unreasonably high threshold for receiving public funds, i.e. non-eligibility of non-
parliamentary parties for public funding;
• Lack of regulation for what purposes political parties can spend public funds;
• Lack of procedures determining how local party organizations can receive public funds;
• Unclear procedures for the conduct of external independent audit of political parties;
• Absence of effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions for political finance violations;
• Unjustifiably burdensome procedures for documenting administrative offenses and short
statutes of limitations for legal proceedings.
To address these shortcomings, it is necessary to develop and approve comprehensive changes to
the legislation that regulates political finance.
Key priorities should include the following:
• Decrease and limit the annual ceiling on donations from individuals and companies so that it
would correlate with the income of the donors in the given period;
• Legally oblige third parties to inform about their intention to make a donation to a party;
• Restore the right of non-parliamentary parties to receive public funding;
• Enhance the system of allocation of public funding among parties so that smaller parties will be
given more than their proportional share (introduce a mixed system for the allocation of funds
from the state budget);
• Allow parties to use public funding for election-related activities and simultaneously abolish the
reimbursement of campaign expenditures to parties;
• Provide an exhaustive list of the items on which parties cannot spend public funds;
3. Key Political Finance Reform Priorities Page 3 out of 7
• Oblige local party organizations to open separate accounts for receipt of public funding;
• Specify the procedures for conducting independent external audit of parties’ financial reporting;
• Provide the NAPC with real-time access to registers and data bases necessary for the effective
control of financial reports and give the NAPC the ability to receive bank accounts information
on its written requests;
• Restrict the right of parties that systematically violate the laws governing financial reporting to
contest elections;
• Extend the statutes of limitation for courts considering administrative cases in the area of
political finance;
• Simplify the procedures for drawing up administrative protocols for political finance violations;
• Enhance the capacity of law enforcement agencies to investigate criminal cases in the area of
political finance;
• Provide NAPC officials with the right to participate in court proceedings;
• Introduce effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions for party and campaign finance
violations.
To ensure an open and inclusive discussion of the necessary legal changes in the area of political
finance reform, a working group which includes Members of Parliament, representatives of the
NAPC, the CEC and lower level election commissions, as well as representatives of other state
authorities, political parties, international and Ukrainian non-governmental organizations, should
be established. Once the respective draft law is submitted to the Verkhovna Rada, it is worth sharing
it with the OSCE/ODIHR for an expert opinion. The draft law text should be subject to inclusive
consultations involving key stakeholders. It is also important that the parliament holds a meaningful
debate prior to the final adoption of the Law.
Enforcement and implementation
Although reforming the legislation could give an important impetus to the revival of political finance
reform, further progress in this area depends on several other, non-legislative improvements. It is
important to keep in mind, however, that some of the measures outlined below will require
amendments to the legislation.
The current system of financial reporting has been repeatedly criticized by political parties and the
NAPC. The obligation of political parties to submit financial reports to the NAPC in a paper-based
format imposes unjustified burden on central and local party organizations, as well as complicates
their verification by the NAPC and hinders access to the reporting data for the public and the media.
To solve this problem, an electronic reporting system for political parties that would enable them
to publish reports in an open data format should be developed. This will significantly simplify the
process of reporting by political parties and make it easier for the NAPC to analyze them. It will also
help non-governmental organizations and media to monitor published data and simplify the average
citizens’ access to the information. The Law “On Amending Certain Legislative Acts on the Prevention
and Counteraction of Political Corruption” adopted by the Rada in December 2019 laid the foundation
for the introduction of such system, but its development requires time. The electronic reporting
system needs to be developed in consultation with various stakeholders, including political party
representatives, to ensure its user-friendliness.
4. Key Political Finance Reform Priorities Page 4 out of 7
At the same time, it is possible to optimize the current political party reporting system before a new
electronic system is introduced. In order to do so, it is necessary to improve the current political party
reporting format by creating a template based on a Microsoft Excel document, which will make it
easier for political parties to complete reports and for the NAPC to analyze them. Civil society
organizations (CSOs) have already developed such report templates, which the NAPC could use for
developing a new reporting format. In addition, attention should be given to amending the
procedures for submission of party financial reports by harmonizing it with the current legislation,
which would also streamline the financial reporting process for political parties.
The paper-based format of financial reports, as well as the lack of access of the NAPC to all registers
and databases, makes it difficult for the anti-corruption body to verify the reports. In order to enhance
the capacity of the NAPC to verify report data which is currently done manually, the new electronic
reporting system shall be connected to all necessary registers and databases to ensure automatic
verification of the reported data. Additionally, following the introduction of the electronic reporting
system, the NAPC should develop and implement an automatic system for the verification of political
party reports, as well as an electronic case management system for the random distribution of cases
between officials authorized to perform the verification.
The effective oversight of political party finance is also hampered by flawed by-laws. The Law “On
Political Parties in Ukraine” obliges the NAPC to approve a methodology for determining the value of
in-kind donations to political parties, so that political parties can properly reflect such donations in
their financial reports. However, the methodology approved by the NAPC did not provide a clear
algorithm for determining the value of in-kind donations, leaving parties with no instruments to
declare such donations. Therefore, there is a pressing need to update or adopt a new methodology
for determining the value of in-kind donations, which shall include clear guidelines on how to
evaluate and reflect such donations.
In addition, a number of other issues related to the NAPC oversight functions remain unaddressed in
by-laws, which also complicates effective state control in this area. In particular, the NAPC failed to
adopt separate procedures for the verification of financial reports of political parties, the use of public
funds by political parties and the verification of information about illegal donations. To ensure that
the NAPC effectively performs its oversight functions, it is necessary to develop and adopt the
mentioned by-laws and regulations.
The effectiveness of public oversight in the area of political finance depends not only on the capacity
of the NAPC to verify the reported data, but also on its ability to reveal what was not reflected in party
financial reports. Monitoring carried out by CSOs, such as CHESNO Civic Movement, Civil Network
OPORA and the Committee of Voters of Ukraine, shows that advertising and other means of
communication in media constitute the largest share of undeclared party spending. Hence, there is a
need to ensure regular monitoring of media, including online media, as well as outdoor advertising,
in order to identify undeclared donations in support of political parties and their expenditures on
media. In line with the recently adopted Election Coder, to perform such media monitoring, the NAPC
may use materials provided by CSOs that deal with election observation and monitoring. In addition,
the NAPC should be provided with access to audio and video recordings of all broadcasts that include
campaigning materials and are owned by TV and radio organizations.
5. Key Political Finance Reform Priorities Page 5 out of 7
At the same time, it is worth paying attention to other expenditures of political parties that are not
reflected in their financial reports and are more difficult to identify. Such expenditures include the
remuneration paid to political party staff, political technologists, spin doctors, campaigners, members
of election commissions, etc. To effectively monitor such expenditures, it is essential to establish
cooperation between the NAPC and other state institutions, including the State Fiscal Service and
the National Police.
The capacity of the NAPC to monitor party activities in the regions is essential to ensure effective
control over the actual spending of political parties. The Law entitles the NAPC to establish up to six
regional branches, but such branches have not been created yet. If the renewed NAPC management
decides to establish such regional branches, it will be necessary to ensure that they have the
capacity to ensure its fully-fledged operation when it comes to the verification of data on political
party incomes and expenditures at regional and local levels, as well as to ensure their cooperation
with local civil society activists.
The inability of the NAPC to effectively perform its oversight functions derived largely from the poor
performance of its Department on the Prevention of Corruption. Since its establishment in 2016, the
Department encountered a number of challenges, in particular the lack of staff (the number of
employees never reached 25 as stipulated in the staff list) and a high staff turnover. In addition, the
delineation of responsibilities between the employees of the Department was not quite clear,
resulting in poor interaction between them. In order to address the above challenges, it is necessary
to identify what caused the said problems by conducting an audit of the Department’s activities. Based
on the results of the audit, additional staff should be hired or, if necessary, the present staff shall
be renewed, ensuring transparent selection of the new employees, as well as proper delineation of
responsibilities among the new employees.
To enhance the NAPC capacity to perform its oversight functions, it is necessary to strengthen the
skills and knowledge of its employees. This task becomes even more relevant, should the oversight
functions and capabilities of the NAPC be expanded, as stated above. Therefore, the
new NAPC management should continuously develop the professional skills (through training
sessions, workshops, learning opportunities, etc.) of the employees responsible for the verification
of financial reports of political parties and for documenting offenses, including on how to effectively
work with open registers, requests for information, conducting verifications, etc.
So far, the NAPC has focused primarily on minor violations of political finance rules, such as making
and receiving donations from persons with tax debts or non-compliance with technical reporting
requirements. At the same time, the process of documenting violations and legal proceedings, and, in
some cases, applying sanctions have imposed an unnecessary burden on the NAPC, the political
parties and their donors which was often disproportionate to the nature of the violations. Therefore,
the NAPC should better focus on preventing such minor violations instead of trying to prosecute all
offenders. The NAPC should consider carrying out awareness raising campaigns on a regular basis to
inform political parties about the most typical violations and to prevent such violations in future. In
addition, the NAPC should consider issuing compliance notices for political parties to correct their
wrongdoings (in accordance with Article 20 of the Law of Ukraine “On Political Parties in Ukraine”),
should they fail to comply with the legal requirements, before applying sanctions.
6. Key Political Finance Reform Priorities Page 6 out of 7
The Election Code empowers the NAPC with oversight functions in presidential and parliamentary
elections. In both cases, the NAPC shares its mandate in campaign finance oversight with the CEC;
however, the delineation of responsibilities between the NAPC and the CEC is not clear and may lead
to duplication of efforts and blurring the lines of responsibility. In the 2019 presidential and
parliamentary elections, the CEC and NAPC managed to establish cooperation to fulfil their functions,
but such cooperation was set up quite late. Furthermore, according to the OSCE/ODIHR election
observation mission, the control exercised by the two oversight institutions was “largely technical”
and neither of them “accepted responsibility or had investigatory powers to determine any
circumvention of transparency regulations, including third-party financing and in-kind donations, or
misuse of state resources”. Therefore, the NAPC and the CEC should prepare for the next national
elections well in advance and work to strengthen their ability to identify undeclared income and
expenditures of political parties and candidates.
In the period 2016-2019, CSOs and investigative journalists played an important role in monitoring the
financial activities of political parties and candidates against the backdrop of ineffective public
oversight of political finance. In some cases, they identified potential violations that served as a basis
for further analysis by the NAPC or investigations by the National Police. Hence, representatives of
CSOs interested in the implementation of political finance reform may become reliable partners for
the renewed NAPC. The new leadership of the anti-corruption institution should establish effective
communication with civil society activists and investigative journalists in terms of recording and
documenting identified offenses, analyzing provided information, as well as developing and
implementing joint initiatives in the field of political finance oversight.
Conclusions
The NAPC reboot opens a window of opportunities for further progress in the implementation of the
political finance reform in Ukraine. To that end, it is very important to ensure smooth coordination of
efforts by all stakeholders, including the parliament, the NAPC, the CEC and other state authorities,
political parties and CSOs. Such cooperation should lay the foundation for the implementation of key
political finance priorities that include both legislative and non-legislative measures.
To reform the political finance legislation, it is necessary to:
• Develop comprehensive changes to the political finance legislation that would address all gaps
and shortcomings of the current legal framework;
• Ensure that the proposed changes are discussed within a broad working group that should
include all relevant stakeholders;
• Ensure that the parliament holds a proper debate on the proposed changes prior to the final
adoption of the comprehensive draft law.
Other political finance reform priorities include the steps to:
• Introduce the electronic reporting system for political parties to ensure that the information
reflected in financial reports of political parties is published in an open data format; such a
system should be automatically connected to all registers and databases required for the
analysis and verification of reported data;
• Simplify and bring the financial report template and the procedure for its submission in
7. Key Political Finance Reform Priorities Page 7 out of 7
compliance with the current law;
• Develop and approve the new methodology for evaluating in-kind donations that would provide
clear and comprehensive guidelines for determining their value and reflecting them in financial
reports;
• Adopt new by-laws and regulations governing the procedures for the verification of party
financial reports, the use of public funding by political parties and the verification of information
on illegal donations;
• Conduct regular monitoring of media and outdoor advertising to identify undeclared donations
to political parties and their expenditures on advertising and media;
• Ensure the fully-fledged operation of the NAPC regional branches (if established) and their
cooperation with regional and local stakeholders;
• Recruit new staff and, if necessary, renew the current staff of the Department for the
Prevention of Political Corruption;
• Provide capacity building opportunities for employees of the NAPC through their participation
in workshops, training courses, etc.;
• Carry out awareness raising campaigns for political parties to prevent the most widespread
violations;
• Ensure continued cooperation between the NAPC and the CEC to strengthen their capacity to
analyze and identify undeclared expenditures of political parties and candidates in elections;
• Establish effective coordination of the NAPC with CSOs and investigative journalists to identify
and document violations and elaborate further ways to facilitate the political finance reform.
This document was prepared by experts from the International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES),
the Center for Political and Legal Reforms, the CHESNO Civic Movement, the Committee of Voters of
Ukraine, and independent experts with the financial support of the United States Agency for
International Development (USAID), Global Affairs Canada and UK Aid. The views expressed herein are
those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID, the governments of the United
States, Canada or the United Kingdom.