This is the presentation of a hypothesis for my personal use Airesis as electronic platform for a political force. http://www.airesis.it/blogs/78-blog-di-zanna/blog_posts/1709-Ipotesi-di-un-gruppo-politico-su-Airesis

1. citizens
Hypothesis political action of the Group
Group on Airesis
Member of
the group
political
initiative
elected
representatives
institutional
Organizations
• Is hypothesized the development of a political group independently,
without a control system external.
• Political action should materialize by the political representatives of
reference, placed in institutional bodies (city councils, provincial
councils, regional councils, parliament), or settle for an action for the
promotion of ideas and themes that educate and convince the
electorate and / or their representatives.
The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

2. Structure of a Group
group
proposals
Blog & forum
citizens
general
public
general
private
Areas
reserved
Thematic
Areas
reserved
Management
anonymous
registered
sympathizers
members
experienced
members
The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

3. Structure of a Group
group
proposals
Blog & forum
citizens
general
public
general
private
Areas
reserved
Thematic
Areas
reserved
Management
anonymous
registered
sympathizers
members
experienced
members
The diagram shows the
proposed structure of a
group and possible
relationships with users
The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

4. Structure of a Group
group
proposals
Blog & forum
citizens
general
public
general
private
Areas
reserved
Thematic
Areas
reserved
Management
anonymous
registered
sympathizers
members
experienced
members
The group may be structured
in different areas, accessible
to users so selectively and
progressive, depending on
the level of involvement in the
Group
The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

5. Structure of a Group
group
proposals
Blog & forum
citizens
general
public
general
private
Areas
reserved
Thematic
Areas
reserved
Management
anonymous
registered
sympathizers
members
experienced
members
The areas could be split
even for functions /
themes in a reasonable
number on the size of the
group.
The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

6. Settings area for the proposed structure "free"
group
proposals
citizens
general
general
private
Areas
reserved
Thematic
Areas
reserved
Management
sympathizers
Member
experts
Anonymous and
registered users
The editors of the proposals can individually choose which options apply to the same:
✔ anonymity temporary
✔ Make proposals externally visible
✔ Vote secret / open vote
Settings of "proposals" Group:
Users can change the advanced settings = YES
The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

7. Settings area for the proposed structure "closed"
group
proposals
citizens
General only private Areas
reserved
Thematic
Areas
reserved
Management
sympathizers
Member
experts
All proposals will be "private", only visible to members of the Group, other options are
predefined, common to all
Settings of "proposals" Group:
anonymity temporary = yes or no
Proposals visible outside = NO
Vote secret = yes or no
Users can change the advanced settings = NO
The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

8. Settings for the area proposals "open"
group
proposals
citizens
General only public
Areas
reserved
Thematic
Areas
reserved
Management
sympathizers
Member
experts
Anonymous and
registered users
All proposals will be in the general area "public", visible to visitors not belonging to the
Group, other options are predefined, common to all.
Settings of "proposals" Group:
anonymity temporary = yes or no
Proposals visible outside = YES
Vote secret = yes or no
Users can change the advanced settings = NO
The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

9. Restricted areas / work areas
The Group may provide one or more sub-groups reserved, managed by
its access permissions and activities.
The purpose of these sub-groups are:
– make space available for proposals that require special privacy;
– designated areas to create committees / working groups, restricted to the
"experts".
Below are listed some typical examples.
● Management areas:
– internal organization
– Management Events / meetings
● Commissions / Thematic Working Groups
– Theme by category (health, education, budget control, legal control ...)
– Group Communications
– Financial Administration Group
– Legal Assistance Group
The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

10. User access management and certification
Access to the Group (as a sympathizer or member) is possible only with the
permission of members who hold the rights of acceptance.
It proposes a system of certification of identity manual, which serves to give
concreteness to users. Obviously, it requires work and responsibility on the
part of the managers of the Group.
Steps:
●
Step 1: the user formally applies to join the group
● Step 2: a manager ("bureaucrat") evaluates the conditions for membership,
based on the Group's policy
●
Step 3: a manager (“bureaucrat”) checks that the account to the physical
person who has applied for membership
●
Step 4: if the identity match, the user is certified and can access the group
● Step 5: a manager (“bureaucrat”) keep register of users and their roles
The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

11. Structure and types of users
Users can be differentiated into four basic types, depending on
their involvement in the Group:
➢anonymous – Visitor not logged in Airesis, wants to browse
Group activities;
➢registered – Airesis registered user, but not a member of the
Group, he wants to know the activities of the Group;
➢sympathizer – member of the group that sympathizes with it
and wants to participate in the activities occasionally;
➢Full Members – member of the group that spends time and
resources to support;
➢expert member – group member with special skills or roles.
Access permissions can be customized with specific settings
for each group, an option made available by Airesis.​​
anonymous
user Airesis
group
Full
Members
experts
sympathizer
The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

12. Anonymous User
Visitor not logged in Airesis, wants to browse Group activities.
● requirements:
– No one (not even logging in Airesis)
● Permissions to the Group:
– Blog & forum public:
● Read the post
● Can not comment on posts
– Forum private:
● inaccessibile
– General proposals public:
● Reads the proposals;
● Can not insert, comment, vote, see the voting results;
– General proposals private:
● inaccessibile
– Proposals in restricted areas:
● inaccessibile
The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

13. Registered User
Airesis registered user, but not a member of the Group, he wants
to know the activities of the Group.
● requirements:
– No one
● Permissions to the Group:
– Blog:
● Read and commented on the blog post
– Forum public:
● read, but would not comment on posts
– Forum private:
● inaccessibile
– General proposals public:
● Read the proposals;
● Unable to submit, comment, vote, but can see the results of voting;
– General proposals private or restricted areas:
● inaccessibile
The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

14. sympathizer user
Member of the group that sympathizes with it and wants to
participate in the activities occasionally.
● requirements:
– User with certification of identity
– Provides a contact (e-mail)
● Permissions to the Group:
– Blog:
● Read and commented on the blog post
– Forum (all):
● Reads, commented and adds post
– General proposals (all):
● Reads, commented and see the results of the proposed;
● Can not vote for them and put them;
– Proposals on restricted areas:
● inaccessibile
The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

15. Full Members
member of the group that spends time and resources to support
● requirements:
– certified member
– financially supports the group (enrollment)
– working in the Group's initiatives (activism)
● Permissions to the Group:
– Blog:
● Read and commented on the blog post
– Forum (all):
● Reads, commented and adds post
– General proposals (all):
● Put, reads, commented, vote and see the results of the proposed;
– Proposals on restricted areas:
● Reads, commented, vote and see the results of the proposed;
● Can not put them;
The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

16. Expert Member
group member with special skills or roles
●
requirements:
– certified member
– financially supports the group (enrollment)
– working in the Group's initiatives (activism)
●
Permissions to the Group:
– Blog:
● Read and commented on the blog post
– Forum (all):
● Reads, commented and adds post
– General proposals (all):
● Put, reads, commented, vote and see the results of the proposed;
– Proposals on Thematic restricted areas, no specific competence:
●
Reads, commented, vote and see the results of the proposed;
●
Can not put them
– Proposals on Thematic restricted areas of specific expertise:
●
Put, reads, commented, vote and see the results of the proposed;
The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

17. Special roles in the Group
● Administrator Group:
– Manages the group on the platform (area, quorum, roles, permissions, ...)
● Communications expert "Dialer":
– Runs the blog (draw new post)
– Indicates meetings, conferences and other events
●
Organizer:
– manages the agendas
– Manages periods of vote
– organizes meetings and internal meetings
●
Bureaucrat:
– Supports external proposals behalf of the Group
– Verify the identity of sympathizers
– records the role of members / supporters (register of certified users)
– Manages common documents
In the absence of members of the roles can be combined.
The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

18. Setting roles and permissions in Group
no no
no no
no no
no no
no no
no
no no
no
permissions
Sympathi-
zer
member
expert
member
Publish in the Home group dialer
create events
dialer
organizer
Create periods of vote organizer
Supporting proposals behalf of the
Group
Bureaucrat
Add participants in the group Bureaucrat
View the proposed private yes yes yes
Contribute to proposals yes yes yes
Insert new proposals in the group yes yes
View documents yes yes yes
Manage documents Bureaucrat
Vote on proposals yes yes
Blue = see special roles
The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

19. Setting roles and permissions in the restricted areas
Area
no
no
no
no
no
no
no no
no
permisions
Sympathi-
zer
member
expert
member
organization
View proposals yes yes
Contribute to proposals yes yes
Insert new proposals maybe maybe
Vote on proposals yes yes
thematic
View proposals yes yes
Contribute to proposals yes yes
Insert new proposals maybe
Vote on proposals yes yes
Maybe = the permit depends on the role of "expert" who takes compared to the
reserved area / workgroup.
The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

20. Setting "quorum" for Proposals
180 d 50% 70% 67% 80%
90 d 20% 50% 40% 67%
60 d 10% 50% 10% 50%
30 d 5% 50% 5% 50%
15 d 10% 50% 10% 50%
Agenda 7 d 0% 50% 0% 50%
3 d 10% 70% 10% 70%
Types of proposal
time for
debate
quorum of debate quorum of final vote
ratings
minimum
Rating /
maturity
Minimum
minimum
voters
required
majority
Group's Statute
strategic guidance
Creation of new activity /
service
Modify activities / services
Fast amendments
urgent proposal
The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.

21. Problems
You should not hide the fact that this proposal / hypothesis has
problems, and that these need to be tackled with traditional
organizational systems.
The platform offers a set of online solutions, but not solutions to all
problems.
● I conclude by listing some obvious problems:
– safety problems related to the use of a non-proprietary platform;
– the impossibility of share with other groups in the proposals, if not by groups
representing higher geographical levels;
– the absence of mechanisms for transferring / sharing initiatives between the
areas of the group;
– the mechanism of user certification requires the same level of activity of the
traditional systems (the platform today does not help).
The text has been automatically translated by Google Translator; are likely typographical errors.