1. The document discusses the evolution of the HR profession and argues it is at a critical crossroads.
2. It presents a model of HR evolving from administrative and operational roles to more strategic, future-focused roles as a internal consulting organization.
3. The document argues HR must proactively define its future role focused on talent to gain more respect, rather than just reacting to external changes.
This document provides an overview and excerpt from a forthcoming book titled "Fearless HR - Driving Business Results". The book discusses how HR has historically been perceived as adding little value due to its administrative past and role as an overhead cost center. However, the excerpt argues that HR can act as a "force multiplier" by shaping the workplace environment and workforce to strengthen business outcomes. It presents research showing correlations between effective talent practices and higher financial performance and shareholder returns. Specifically, companies with a "Talent Mindset" that views employees as an asset rather than just a cost tend to outperform peers. The excerpt aims to counter the perception that HR does not add value by highlighting evidence that effective talent practices are linked to improved
The document discusses how HR is entering a new decade where it will take center stage. Several facts are presented that show the significant impact HR has on key business metrics like talent retention, market valuation, costs, and performance. As perceptions of HR's strategic value change, the structure of HR departments is evolving with centers of excellence, shared services, and embedded business partners. The most strategic role is that of the HR business partner who works directly with business units to execute organizational strategy through talent practices and workforce optimization.
The document discusses how the 2010s will be known as the "Decade of HR" as irrefutable business facts and evidence show that HR practices make a significant impact on organizational performance. It highlights how people are the primary drivers of business results and the strategic role of HR Business Partners in improving the workforce to help business units execute strategy. To fully capitalize on this opportunity, HR needs to focus on developing HRBP skills, driving business outcomes with data, and shaping cultures and workplaces that enable organizations to adapt and succeed.
This document discusses measuring leadership in companies. It makes the following key points:
1) While companies closely track metrics like finances, quality, and surveys, few directly measure if they have the right leaders now and for the future. Developing leaders is important but difficult to measure precisely.
2) Top companies take a holistic approach to leadership measurement, gathering data to provide insights for human resources, business leaders, people managers, and potential leaders themselves.
3) Examples of companies like Cummins use frameworks to rigorously assess employees' performance and potential, focusing on specific leadership attributes needed for business goals. Surveys also give feedback to better develop individual potential leaders.
Commentators are currently polarised around the future of the HR function. Some suggest that the function is about to enter a boom period as after several years of cajoling, organisations are placing far greater emphasis on talent management and putting strategic HR activities at the heart of the business. On the other hand, others believe that HR is still struggling to rise to the challenge and is destined to remain a transaction based cost centre for the foreseeable future. As with most things, the truth probably lies somewhere in the middle. This article explores the evidence for both perspectives and suggests that solving apparently intangible human capital problems is the best way for HR to profit given current circumstances.
This document provides an overview of key topics in human resource (HR) management. It discusses the importance of elevating HR to a position of power within organizations. It outlines the seven main categories of HR activities, including strategic HR management, staffing, compensation and benefits. It also examines the major challenges facing HR, such as globalization, workforce trends, and organizational costs. The roles of HR are transforming from administrative to more strategic functions. HR technology and ethics in HR management are also addressed.
1) The document reviews the book "Winning" by Jack Welch, the former CEO of General Electric, who led the company to great success during his tenure.
2) Welch outlines his principles for business success, including focusing on human resources, leadership, and adapting the organization as needed. He advocates for recruiting only the best employees and creating a flat organizational structure.
3) While Welch's focus on human capital and leadership provided insights, the reviewer critiques some of Welch's perspectives such as his bias against unions and lack of acknowledgement of external constraints on a CEO's authority from boards, laws and regulations.
This document summarizes a research study from 1994 that examined employee motivation at a UK defense systems manufacturer. The study aimed to understand motivation from the employees' perspective. A survey was administered to 51 employees across levels and departments. The results showed that while the company created a mostly positive work environment, employees gave very low scores for feelings of warmth and support from leadership. Further analysis revealed deep issues in how operators and engineers experienced leadership. The study highlights the importance of understanding employee perceptions in order to close gaps between reality and company goals/philosophy regarding culture and motivation.
This document provides an overview and excerpt from a forthcoming book titled "Fearless HR - Driving Business Results". The book discusses how HR has historically been perceived as adding little value due to its administrative past and role as an overhead cost center. However, the excerpt argues that HR can act as a "force multiplier" by shaping the workplace environment and workforce to strengthen business outcomes. It presents research showing correlations between effective talent practices and higher financial performance and shareholder returns. Specifically, companies with a "Talent Mindset" that views employees as an asset rather than just a cost tend to outperform peers. The excerpt aims to counter the perception that HR does not add value by highlighting evidence that effective talent practices are linked to improved
The document discusses how HR is entering a new decade where it will take center stage. Several facts are presented that show the significant impact HR has on key business metrics like talent retention, market valuation, costs, and performance. As perceptions of HR's strategic value change, the structure of HR departments is evolving with centers of excellence, shared services, and embedded business partners. The most strategic role is that of the HR business partner who works directly with business units to execute organizational strategy through talent practices and workforce optimization.
The document discusses how the 2010s will be known as the "Decade of HR" as irrefutable business facts and evidence show that HR practices make a significant impact on organizational performance. It highlights how people are the primary drivers of business results and the strategic role of HR Business Partners in improving the workforce to help business units execute strategy. To fully capitalize on this opportunity, HR needs to focus on developing HRBP skills, driving business outcomes with data, and shaping cultures and workplaces that enable organizations to adapt and succeed.
This document discusses measuring leadership in companies. It makes the following key points:
1) While companies closely track metrics like finances, quality, and surveys, few directly measure if they have the right leaders now and for the future. Developing leaders is important but difficult to measure precisely.
2) Top companies take a holistic approach to leadership measurement, gathering data to provide insights for human resources, business leaders, people managers, and potential leaders themselves.
3) Examples of companies like Cummins use frameworks to rigorously assess employees' performance and potential, focusing on specific leadership attributes needed for business goals. Surveys also give feedback to better develop individual potential leaders.
Commentators are currently polarised around the future of the HR function. Some suggest that the function is about to enter a boom period as after several years of cajoling, organisations are placing far greater emphasis on talent management and putting strategic HR activities at the heart of the business. On the other hand, others believe that HR is still struggling to rise to the challenge and is destined to remain a transaction based cost centre for the foreseeable future. As with most things, the truth probably lies somewhere in the middle. This article explores the evidence for both perspectives and suggests that solving apparently intangible human capital problems is the best way for HR to profit given current circumstances.
This document provides an overview of key topics in human resource (HR) management. It discusses the importance of elevating HR to a position of power within organizations. It outlines the seven main categories of HR activities, including strategic HR management, staffing, compensation and benefits. It also examines the major challenges facing HR, such as globalization, workforce trends, and organizational costs. The roles of HR are transforming from administrative to more strategic functions. HR technology and ethics in HR management are also addressed.
1) The document reviews the book "Winning" by Jack Welch, the former CEO of General Electric, who led the company to great success during his tenure.
2) Welch outlines his principles for business success, including focusing on human resources, leadership, and adapting the organization as needed. He advocates for recruiting only the best employees and creating a flat organizational structure.
3) While Welch's focus on human capital and leadership provided insights, the reviewer critiques some of Welch's perspectives such as his bias against unions and lack of acknowledgement of external constraints on a CEO's authority from boards, laws and regulations.
This document summarizes a research study from 1994 that examined employee motivation at a UK defense systems manufacturer. The study aimed to understand motivation from the employees' perspective. A survey was administered to 51 employees across levels and departments. The results showed that while the company created a mostly positive work environment, employees gave very low scores for feelings of warmth and support from leadership. Further analysis revealed deep issues in how operators and engineers experienced leadership. The study highlights the importance of understanding employee perceptions in order to close gaps between reality and company goals/philosophy regarding culture and motivation.
This document outlines nine best practices for effective talent management. It discusses how talent management has become a critical organizational function and competitive advantage. Organizations must identify talent gaps, develop a talent management plan integrated with business strategies, and ensure accurate hiring, promotion, performance management, and development. Effective talent management leads to higher business performance, earnings, and financial outcomes. It is driven by factors such as changing employee and demographic trends, increasing complexity, and expectations from boards and investors for leadership to create value through talent.
Leadership, Intangibles & Talent Q1 2009 Four GroupsFour Groups
Unsurprisingly, the financial crisis is still uppermost in people’ s minds and new ideas and insights are slowly emerging, interestingly not always from organisations which one would term the “HR establishment”. Over and above this, other themes for this quarter include;
• Leadership development is going nowhere fast
• HR’ s relevance to an organisation’ s success
• HR acting more like a teenager, or not
• Command and control, enterprise 2.0 and amplified workers
• Successful recruitment via a self directing process
• A lack of creativity and death by data
• The big picture HR role
• Innovation, change and new ideas
As always any comments and feedback are welcome!
A crisis of shortages and gaps in talent at U.S. companies is gathering on the horizon. The coming wave of retiring business executives at companies in the developed world, extreme shortages in the numbers of their replacements, looming
gaps in the talent and skills of these replacements, global competition for talent, and falling birthrates in the developed world are some of the key forces acting together. This crisis is powerful, it will radically change companies, and the effects will be felt for a very long time.
This document discusses strategic human resource management (SHRM) and the role of human resources as a strategic business partner. It provides definitions of SHRM, outlines four perspectives on SHRM activities and themes, and describes models of the evolution of HR roles from administrative experts to strategic partners. The document emphasizes that effective HRM is key to competitiveness and that people and processes within an organization are a source of sustained competitive advantage. It argues that HR leaders should participate directly in strategy formulation, ensure people issues are addressed as part of business strategies, and align HR strategies and processes to enable the implementation of business strategies.
This document discusses trends in human resource management (HRM), including outsourcing certain HR functions to reduce costs and focus internal resources on more strategic activities. It also addresses managing a diverse workforce, promoting employee wellness through programs like EAPs and EWPs, and developing talent strategies to attract and retain top performers in a competitive environment. Effective diversity management and a focus on total employee well-being are highlighted as important for organizational success.
By Courtney Hamilton, David F. Larcker, Stephen A. Miles, and Brian Tayan, Stanford Closer Look Series, February 15, 2019
Two decades ago, McKinsey advanced the idea that large U.S. companies are engaged in a “war for talent” and that to remain competitive they need to make a strategic effort to attract, retain, and develop the highest-performing executives. To understand the contribution of the human resources department to company strategy, we surveyed 85 CEOs and chief human resources officers at Fortune 1000 companies. In this Closer Look, we examine what these senior executives say about the contribution of HR to the strategic efforts and financial performance of their companies.
We ask:
• What role does HR play in the development of corporate strategy?
• Does HR have an equal voice or is it junior to other members of the senior management team?
• Do boards see HR and human capital as critical to corporate performance?
• How do boards ascertain whether management has the right HR strategy?
• How adept are companies at using data from HR systems to learn what programs work and why?
Hr 8 mistakes made in succession planning and how to fix themMarcus Vannini
The document discusses 8 common mistakes made in succession planning and how to fix them. It provides case studies of companies that made these mistakes, such as assuming succession planning is only an HR program, trying to do too much too fast, and failing to sustain succession planning efforts over time. The key mistakes are not having senior leadership buy-in, lack of flexibility, taking on too much at once, lack of individual development plans, and not maintaining succession planning as an ongoing process.
[Whitepaper] The New Boardroom Imperative: Recruitment MarketingAppcast
Learn practical applications that can enhance your recruitment marketing strategy at the board-level, and throughout the rest of your organization.
Written by Dave Forman - Author, Fearless HR
Mc Kinsey Making Talent A Strategic Priorityina_rasheva
Making talent a strategic priority remains an ongoing challenge for companies. While many have invested heavily in HR systems, talent issues are still not adequately addressed and seen as a long-term strategic issue requiring senior management attention. There are also several external factors like demographic changes, globalization, and the rise of knowledge workers that are intensifying the war for talent. Companies also bear some responsibility due to short-term thinking that diverts attention from long-term talent planning. Moving forward, companies need to view talent management as a core business strategy and address the needs of talent at all levels, not just top performers.
1. The document discusses how companies can increase employee productivity and skills through investment in education programs. It argues that replacing experienced workers is risky and costly, so companies should focus on improving existing employees.
2. The author proposes that companies formally and informally train employees, foster engagement through competitive activities and social events, and provide leadership that clearly explains the rationale for educational initiatives in order to increase productivity.
3. Research shows that employee engagement correlates to increased business outcomes, so companies should determine each individual's skills needs, motivate them through reason, authority and compassion, and encourage an open and competitive mindset to continually improve workers.
The Impact of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) on Talent Developmentpaperpublications3
Abstract: This Paper is one of the most important papers which focus on Key Performance Indicators in relation with talent development which start to be the main focus of all companies and countries and most researchers start working on the same subject to give more insights on it. This paper aim to explore the importance of Key Performance Indicators and its impact on Talent development and the advantages of using the performance management system especially in the large companies where there are difficulties in assessing employees’ performance. The importance of this research is the well develop and design comprehensive framework about the establishment, use and evolution of key performance indicators and how specialists can use the tools and implement process step by step with the highlighting of all challenges and limitations. The challenge is in the KPIs more than calculate the human capital ROI and Talent Development because it’s the hardest part where implementing such techniques can restructure all the organization from the bottom line. This level of extensiveness is the place the test exists much of the time, and where the profit of having a decent strategic plan is not completely figured it out. In short, it is a long between joined affix that needs to be concentrated on nearly part by part.
HR Challenges and Solutions - Maintaining Compliance and Mitigating Future RiskADP Marketing
Many companies are facing increasing challenges to stay up to date with risk and compliance. Learn how to take control of compliance and manage risk in your business.
1) The most pressing HR challenge for organizations in 2012 is a lack of high-potential leaders, according to 31% of respondents. Additionally, 23% cited a shortage of talent at all levels.
2) Lean times have made it difficult for organizations to recruit, retain, and develop future leaders. Companies are also concerned about retaining top talent and losing them to other opportunities.
3) HR leaders must work with senior leaders to address concerns about leadership pipelines and retention by focusing on employee engagement, motivation, and career development.
ADP White Paper - The Role of HR - Executives ExpectationsLee Saunders
The document discusses the changing role of HR professionals over the past few decades. It examines expectations that business executives have of HR departments, focusing on talent management, employee engagement, and using technology effectively. While HR is seen as more strategic and valuable than in the past, the document finds there remains a gap between how HR departments view their work and how it is perceived outside of HR, with many non-HR managers still dissatisfied with HR services. Key expectations for HR include effective talent management strategies to recruit and retain top talent.
Managers think they are a bureaucratic chore forced by human resources (HR). Employees approach them with fear and trepidation. No one likes them. Is it time to fire annual performance reviews?
Gallup State of the American Manager ReportBrandon Rigoni
Only about 10% of people possess the talent required to be an effective manager. Most organizations promote people to manager roles for the wrong reasons, such as tenure rather than talent, resulting in miscast managers who fail to engage employees. Gallup estimates that disengaged managers cost the US economy $319-398 billion annually in lost productivity. However, companies that select managers based on talent are more likely to choose high-performing managers who can engage employees and improve business outcomes. The report provides insights into distinguishing great managers and developing a talent-based strategy to maximize human capital potential.
The document summarizes a book review of two books on human resources: Dave Ulrich's "Human Resources Champions: The Next Agenda for Adding Value and Delivering Results" and Dave Ulrich and Wayne Brockbank's "The HR Value Proposition." The summary is as follows:
1) Ulrich's first book calls attention to a transition in HR from what it "does" to what it must "deliver." It argues HR must become "partners, players, and pioneers" and focus on business outcomes rather than employee management.
2) Ulrich and Brockbank's book aims to redefine the "HR value proposition" and argue for transformative rather than transactional HR. It
SPOTLIGHT ARTWORK Do Ho Suh, Floor, 1997–2000, PVC figures, gl.docxsusanschei
SPOTLIGHT ARTWORK Do Ho Suh, Floor, 1997–2000, PVC figures, glass plates, phenolic sheets, polyurethane resin; modules 100 x 100 x 8 cm
Installation view at Lehmann Maupin Gallery, New York
Why We Love
to Hate HR
...and What HR
Can Do About It
by Peter Cappelli
SPOTLIGHT ON RETHINKING HUMAN RESOURCES
Peter Cappelli is a
professor of management
at the Wharton School and
the author of several books,
including Will College
Pay Off? A Guide to the
Most Important Financial
Decision You’ll Ever Make
(PublicAffairs, 2015).
HBR.ORG
July–August 2015 Harvard Business Review 55
These feelings aren’t new. They’ve erupted now
and in the past because we don’t like being told how
to behave—and no other group in organizational life,
not even finance, bosses us around as systematically
as HR does. We get defensive when we’re instructed
to change how we interact with people, especially
those who report to us, because that goes right to the
core of who we are. What’s more, HR makes us per-
form tasks we dislike, such as documenting problems
with employees. And it prevents us from doing what
we want, such as hiring someone we “just know” is
a good fit. Its directives affect every person in the
organization, right up to the top, every single day.
The complaints also have a cyclical quality—
they’re driven largely by the business context. Usu-
ally when companies are struggling with labor issues,
HR is seen as a valued leadership partner. When
things are going more smoothly all around, manag-
ers tend to think, “What’s HR doing for us, anyway?”
This doesn’t mean that HR is above reproach.
Quite the contrary: It has plenty of room to improve,
and this is a moment of enormous opportunity. Little
has been done in the past few decades to examine the
value of widely used practices that are central to how
companies operate. By separating the effective from
the worthless, HR leaders can secure huge payoffs for
their organizations. But it’s important to understand
HR’s tumultuous history with business leaders and
the economy before turning our attention to what the
function should be doing now and in the future.
The “Personnel” Pendulum
How top executives feel about HR pretty reliably re-
flects what’s going on in the U.S. economy. When the
economy is down and the labor market is slack, they
see HR as a nuisance. But sentiments change when
labor tightens up and HR practices become essential
to companies’ immediate success.
Think back to the Great Depression. People would
put up with nearly anything to stay employed. Line
managers complained that personnel departments
were getting in the way of better performance, which
they thought could be achieved with the “drive” sys-
tem: threatening workers and sometimes even hit-
ting them if they failed to measure up.
Similarly, business leaders didn’t put a lot of
stock in HR during the 2001 and 2008 recessions, be-
cause employees—keenly aware of how replaceable
th.
Article Critique Grading Rubric Levels of Achievement.docxfestockton
Article Critique Grading Rubric
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Not Acceptable Poor Fair Good
APA Style,
Proofreading
& Editing of
Paper
0 %
Paper has more
than 5 problems or
errors in the format
and mechanics.
50 %
Paper has 3-5
problems or
errors in the
format and
mechanics
75 %
Paper has one or
two problems or
errors in the
format and
mechanics.
100 %
Paper is formatted using an
APA style: (Includes: Title Page,
Abstract & Text Citations).
Proofreading & Editing of
Paper (Overall paper is free of
spelling, grammar and
punctuation errors)
Article
Summary
0 %
The summary does
not cover key points
in the article.
50 %
The summary
covers some
the key points
in the article.
75 %
The summary
covers most the
key points in the
article.
100 %
The summary covers all the
important key points in the
article.
Critique and
discussion of
the author’s
point of view
0 %
Student does not
present a clear
critique of the
article. Contents of
essay may be
largely summary or
be unsubstantiated
opinion.
50 %
Student
makes an
attempt at a
critique with
some claims,
but little
supporting
evidence.
75 %
Student makes a
clear critique of
the article, using
direct evidence
from the text and
supporting claims
with evidence.
100 %
Student makes a clear, well-
articulated, and well-planned
critique of the article, using
direct evidence from the text
and supporting claims with
evidence.
Explanation
of your own
position
(agree or
disagree)
0 %
The explanation of
the position is
di�cult to
understand and no
supportive
information
50 %
Paper has
explanations
on the
position
(agree or
disagree) but
no strong
supportive
information.
75 %
Paper makes
explanations on
the position
(agree or
disagree) with
supportive
information,
facts, and
references
100 %
Paper makes detailed
explanations on the position
(agree or disagree) with strong
supportive information, facts,
and references.
Extensions of
real world
business
application(s)
0 %
The transitions
between ideas are
unclear or
nonexistent.
50 %
Some
transitions
work well; but
connections
between
other ideas
are fuzzy.
75 %
Transitions clearly
show how ideas
are connected,
but there is little
variety.
100 %
A variety of thoughtful
transitions are used. They
clearly show how ideas are
connected.
Name
Description
Rubric Detail
Weight
20.00%
Weight
20.00%
Weight
20.00%
Weight
20.00%
Weight
20.00%
View Associated Items
javascript:associationListToggle( );
SPOTLIGHT ARTWORK Do Ho Suh, Floor, 1997–2000, PVC figures, glass plates, phenolic sheets, polyurethane resin; modules 100 x 100 x 8 cm
Installation view at Lehmann Maupin Gallery, New York
Why We Love
to Hate HR
...and What HR
Can Do About It
by Peter Cappelli
SPOTLIGHT ON RETHINKING HUMAN RESOURCES
Peter Cappelli is a
professor of management
at the Wharton School and
the author of several books,
including Will College
Pay Off? A Guide to the
Most Important Financial
Decision You’ll Ever Make
(PublicAff ...
This document discusses the changing role of corporate boards and how this impacts chief human resource officers (CHROs). Some key points:
1. Corporate boards have evolved from ritualistic appendages to playing a more active leadership role in areas traditionally managed. This creates opportunities for CHROs but many have yet to become strategic advisors to boards.
2. A survey found that less than a third of directors view their CHRO as having significant influence, and nearly a quarter see the CHRO as having little influence.
3. To succeed, CHROs must position talent as integral to strategy and risk oversight. They should act as advocates rather than bureaucrats and establish themselves as trusted advisors to boards.
This document outlines nine best practices for effective talent management. It discusses how talent management has become a critical organizational function and competitive advantage. Organizations must identify talent gaps, develop a talent management plan integrated with business strategies, and ensure accurate hiring, promotion, performance management, and development. Effective talent management leads to higher business performance, earnings, and financial outcomes. It is driven by factors such as changing employee and demographic trends, increasing complexity, and expectations from boards and investors for leadership to create value through talent.
Leadership, Intangibles & Talent Q1 2009 Four GroupsFour Groups
Unsurprisingly, the financial crisis is still uppermost in people’ s minds and new ideas and insights are slowly emerging, interestingly not always from organisations which one would term the “HR establishment”. Over and above this, other themes for this quarter include;
• Leadership development is going nowhere fast
• HR’ s relevance to an organisation’ s success
• HR acting more like a teenager, or not
• Command and control, enterprise 2.0 and amplified workers
• Successful recruitment via a self directing process
• A lack of creativity and death by data
• The big picture HR role
• Innovation, change and new ideas
As always any comments and feedback are welcome!
A crisis of shortages and gaps in talent at U.S. companies is gathering on the horizon. The coming wave of retiring business executives at companies in the developed world, extreme shortages in the numbers of their replacements, looming
gaps in the talent and skills of these replacements, global competition for talent, and falling birthrates in the developed world are some of the key forces acting together. This crisis is powerful, it will radically change companies, and the effects will be felt for a very long time.
This document discusses strategic human resource management (SHRM) and the role of human resources as a strategic business partner. It provides definitions of SHRM, outlines four perspectives on SHRM activities and themes, and describes models of the evolution of HR roles from administrative experts to strategic partners. The document emphasizes that effective HRM is key to competitiveness and that people and processes within an organization are a source of sustained competitive advantage. It argues that HR leaders should participate directly in strategy formulation, ensure people issues are addressed as part of business strategies, and align HR strategies and processes to enable the implementation of business strategies.
This document discusses trends in human resource management (HRM), including outsourcing certain HR functions to reduce costs and focus internal resources on more strategic activities. It also addresses managing a diverse workforce, promoting employee wellness through programs like EAPs and EWPs, and developing talent strategies to attract and retain top performers in a competitive environment. Effective diversity management and a focus on total employee well-being are highlighted as important for organizational success.
By Courtney Hamilton, David F. Larcker, Stephen A. Miles, and Brian Tayan, Stanford Closer Look Series, February 15, 2019
Two decades ago, McKinsey advanced the idea that large U.S. companies are engaged in a “war for talent” and that to remain competitive they need to make a strategic effort to attract, retain, and develop the highest-performing executives. To understand the contribution of the human resources department to company strategy, we surveyed 85 CEOs and chief human resources officers at Fortune 1000 companies. In this Closer Look, we examine what these senior executives say about the contribution of HR to the strategic efforts and financial performance of their companies.
We ask:
• What role does HR play in the development of corporate strategy?
• Does HR have an equal voice or is it junior to other members of the senior management team?
• Do boards see HR and human capital as critical to corporate performance?
• How do boards ascertain whether management has the right HR strategy?
• How adept are companies at using data from HR systems to learn what programs work and why?
Hr 8 mistakes made in succession planning and how to fix themMarcus Vannini
The document discusses 8 common mistakes made in succession planning and how to fix them. It provides case studies of companies that made these mistakes, such as assuming succession planning is only an HR program, trying to do too much too fast, and failing to sustain succession planning efforts over time. The key mistakes are not having senior leadership buy-in, lack of flexibility, taking on too much at once, lack of individual development plans, and not maintaining succession planning as an ongoing process.
[Whitepaper] The New Boardroom Imperative: Recruitment MarketingAppcast
Learn practical applications that can enhance your recruitment marketing strategy at the board-level, and throughout the rest of your organization.
Written by Dave Forman - Author, Fearless HR
Mc Kinsey Making Talent A Strategic Priorityina_rasheva
Making talent a strategic priority remains an ongoing challenge for companies. While many have invested heavily in HR systems, talent issues are still not adequately addressed and seen as a long-term strategic issue requiring senior management attention. There are also several external factors like demographic changes, globalization, and the rise of knowledge workers that are intensifying the war for talent. Companies also bear some responsibility due to short-term thinking that diverts attention from long-term talent planning. Moving forward, companies need to view talent management as a core business strategy and address the needs of talent at all levels, not just top performers.
1. The document discusses how companies can increase employee productivity and skills through investment in education programs. It argues that replacing experienced workers is risky and costly, so companies should focus on improving existing employees.
2. The author proposes that companies formally and informally train employees, foster engagement through competitive activities and social events, and provide leadership that clearly explains the rationale for educational initiatives in order to increase productivity.
3. Research shows that employee engagement correlates to increased business outcomes, so companies should determine each individual's skills needs, motivate them through reason, authority and compassion, and encourage an open and competitive mindset to continually improve workers.
The Impact of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) on Talent Developmentpaperpublications3
Abstract: This Paper is one of the most important papers which focus on Key Performance Indicators in relation with talent development which start to be the main focus of all companies and countries and most researchers start working on the same subject to give more insights on it. This paper aim to explore the importance of Key Performance Indicators and its impact on Talent development and the advantages of using the performance management system especially in the large companies where there are difficulties in assessing employees’ performance. The importance of this research is the well develop and design comprehensive framework about the establishment, use and evolution of key performance indicators and how specialists can use the tools and implement process step by step with the highlighting of all challenges and limitations. The challenge is in the KPIs more than calculate the human capital ROI and Talent Development because it’s the hardest part where implementing such techniques can restructure all the organization from the bottom line. This level of extensiveness is the place the test exists much of the time, and where the profit of having a decent strategic plan is not completely figured it out. In short, it is a long between joined affix that needs to be concentrated on nearly part by part.
HR Challenges and Solutions - Maintaining Compliance and Mitigating Future RiskADP Marketing
Many companies are facing increasing challenges to stay up to date with risk and compliance. Learn how to take control of compliance and manage risk in your business.
1) The most pressing HR challenge for organizations in 2012 is a lack of high-potential leaders, according to 31% of respondents. Additionally, 23% cited a shortage of talent at all levels.
2) Lean times have made it difficult for organizations to recruit, retain, and develop future leaders. Companies are also concerned about retaining top talent and losing them to other opportunities.
3) HR leaders must work with senior leaders to address concerns about leadership pipelines and retention by focusing on employee engagement, motivation, and career development.
ADP White Paper - The Role of HR - Executives ExpectationsLee Saunders
The document discusses the changing role of HR professionals over the past few decades. It examines expectations that business executives have of HR departments, focusing on talent management, employee engagement, and using technology effectively. While HR is seen as more strategic and valuable than in the past, the document finds there remains a gap between how HR departments view their work and how it is perceived outside of HR, with many non-HR managers still dissatisfied with HR services. Key expectations for HR include effective talent management strategies to recruit and retain top talent.
Managers think they are a bureaucratic chore forced by human resources (HR). Employees approach them with fear and trepidation. No one likes them. Is it time to fire annual performance reviews?
Gallup State of the American Manager ReportBrandon Rigoni
Only about 10% of people possess the talent required to be an effective manager. Most organizations promote people to manager roles for the wrong reasons, such as tenure rather than talent, resulting in miscast managers who fail to engage employees. Gallup estimates that disengaged managers cost the US economy $319-398 billion annually in lost productivity. However, companies that select managers based on talent are more likely to choose high-performing managers who can engage employees and improve business outcomes. The report provides insights into distinguishing great managers and developing a talent-based strategy to maximize human capital potential.
The document summarizes a book review of two books on human resources: Dave Ulrich's "Human Resources Champions: The Next Agenda for Adding Value and Delivering Results" and Dave Ulrich and Wayne Brockbank's "The HR Value Proposition." The summary is as follows:
1) Ulrich's first book calls attention to a transition in HR from what it "does" to what it must "deliver." It argues HR must become "partners, players, and pioneers" and focus on business outcomes rather than employee management.
2) Ulrich and Brockbank's book aims to redefine the "HR value proposition" and argue for transformative rather than transactional HR. It
SPOTLIGHT ARTWORK Do Ho Suh, Floor, 1997–2000, PVC figures, gl.docxsusanschei
SPOTLIGHT ARTWORK Do Ho Suh, Floor, 1997–2000, PVC figures, glass plates, phenolic sheets, polyurethane resin; modules 100 x 100 x 8 cm
Installation view at Lehmann Maupin Gallery, New York
Why We Love
to Hate HR
...and What HR
Can Do About It
by Peter Cappelli
SPOTLIGHT ON RETHINKING HUMAN RESOURCES
Peter Cappelli is a
professor of management
at the Wharton School and
the author of several books,
including Will College
Pay Off? A Guide to the
Most Important Financial
Decision You’ll Ever Make
(PublicAffairs, 2015).
HBR.ORG
July–August 2015 Harvard Business Review 55
These feelings aren’t new. They’ve erupted now
and in the past because we don’t like being told how
to behave—and no other group in organizational life,
not even finance, bosses us around as systematically
as HR does. We get defensive when we’re instructed
to change how we interact with people, especially
those who report to us, because that goes right to the
core of who we are. What’s more, HR makes us per-
form tasks we dislike, such as documenting problems
with employees. And it prevents us from doing what
we want, such as hiring someone we “just know” is
a good fit. Its directives affect every person in the
organization, right up to the top, every single day.
The complaints also have a cyclical quality—
they’re driven largely by the business context. Usu-
ally when companies are struggling with labor issues,
HR is seen as a valued leadership partner. When
things are going more smoothly all around, manag-
ers tend to think, “What’s HR doing for us, anyway?”
This doesn’t mean that HR is above reproach.
Quite the contrary: It has plenty of room to improve,
and this is a moment of enormous opportunity. Little
has been done in the past few decades to examine the
value of widely used practices that are central to how
companies operate. By separating the effective from
the worthless, HR leaders can secure huge payoffs for
their organizations. But it’s important to understand
HR’s tumultuous history with business leaders and
the economy before turning our attention to what the
function should be doing now and in the future.
The “Personnel” Pendulum
How top executives feel about HR pretty reliably re-
flects what’s going on in the U.S. economy. When the
economy is down and the labor market is slack, they
see HR as a nuisance. But sentiments change when
labor tightens up and HR practices become essential
to companies’ immediate success.
Think back to the Great Depression. People would
put up with nearly anything to stay employed. Line
managers complained that personnel departments
were getting in the way of better performance, which
they thought could be achieved with the “drive” sys-
tem: threatening workers and sometimes even hit-
ting them if they failed to measure up.
Similarly, business leaders didn’t put a lot of
stock in HR during the 2001 and 2008 recessions, be-
cause employees—keenly aware of how replaceable
th.
Article Critique Grading Rubric Levels of Achievement.docxfestockton
Article Critique Grading Rubric
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Not Acceptable Poor Fair Good
APA Style,
Proofreading
& Editing of
Paper
0 %
Paper has more
than 5 problems or
errors in the format
and mechanics.
50 %
Paper has 3-5
problems or
errors in the
format and
mechanics
75 %
Paper has one or
two problems or
errors in the
format and
mechanics.
100 %
Paper is formatted using an
APA style: (Includes: Title Page,
Abstract & Text Citations).
Proofreading & Editing of
Paper (Overall paper is free of
spelling, grammar and
punctuation errors)
Article
Summary
0 %
The summary does
not cover key points
in the article.
50 %
The summary
covers some
the key points
in the article.
75 %
The summary
covers most the
key points in the
article.
100 %
The summary covers all the
important key points in the
article.
Critique and
discussion of
the author’s
point of view
0 %
Student does not
present a clear
critique of the
article. Contents of
essay may be
largely summary or
be unsubstantiated
opinion.
50 %
Student
makes an
attempt at a
critique with
some claims,
but little
supporting
evidence.
75 %
Student makes a
clear critique of
the article, using
direct evidence
from the text and
supporting claims
with evidence.
100 %
Student makes a clear, well-
articulated, and well-planned
critique of the article, using
direct evidence from the text
and supporting claims with
evidence.
Explanation
of your own
position
(agree or
disagree)
0 %
The explanation of
the position is
di�cult to
understand and no
supportive
information
50 %
Paper has
explanations
on the
position
(agree or
disagree) but
no strong
supportive
information.
75 %
Paper makes
explanations on
the position
(agree or
disagree) with
supportive
information,
facts, and
references
100 %
Paper makes detailed
explanations on the position
(agree or disagree) with strong
supportive information, facts,
and references.
Extensions of
real world
business
application(s)
0 %
The transitions
between ideas are
unclear or
nonexistent.
50 %
Some
transitions
work well; but
connections
between
other ideas
are fuzzy.
75 %
Transitions clearly
show how ideas
are connected,
but there is little
variety.
100 %
A variety of thoughtful
transitions are used. They
clearly show how ideas are
connected.
Name
Description
Rubric Detail
Weight
20.00%
Weight
20.00%
Weight
20.00%
Weight
20.00%
Weight
20.00%
View Associated Items
javascript:associationListToggle( );
SPOTLIGHT ARTWORK Do Ho Suh, Floor, 1997–2000, PVC figures, glass plates, phenolic sheets, polyurethane resin; modules 100 x 100 x 8 cm
Installation view at Lehmann Maupin Gallery, New York
Why We Love
to Hate HR
...and What HR
Can Do About It
by Peter Cappelli
SPOTLIGHT ON RETHINKING HUMAN RESOURCES
Peter Cappelli is a
professor of management
at the Wharton School and
the author of several books,
including Will College
Pay Off? A Guide to the
Most Important Financial
Decision You’ll Ever Make
(PublicAff ...
This document discusses the changing role of corporate boards and how this impacts chief human resource officers (CHROs). Some key points:
1. Corporate boards have evolved from ritualistic appendages to playing a more active leadership role in areas traditionally managed. This creates opportunities for CHROs but many have yet to become strategic advisors to boards.
2. A survey found that less than a third of directors view their CHRO as having significant influence, and nearly a quarter see the CHRO as having little influence.
3. To succeed, CHROs must position talent as integral to strategy and risk oversight. They should act as advocates rather than bureaucrats and establish themselves as trusted advisors to boards.
Why we hate HRIn a knowledge economy, companies with the best .docxambersalomon88660
Why we hate HR
In a knowledge economy, companies with the best talent win. And finding, nurturing, and developing that talent should be one of the most important tasks in a corporation. So why does human resources do such a bad job — and how can we fix it?
By Fast Company Stafflong Read
Well, here’s a rockin’ party: a gathering of several hundred midlevel human-resources executives in Las Vegas. (Yo, Wayne Newton! How’s the 401(k)?) They are here, ensconced for two days at faux-glam Caesars Palace, to confer on “strategic HR leadership,” a conceit that sounds, to the lay observer, at once frightening and self-contradictory. If not plain laughable.
Because let’s face it: After close to 20 years of hopeful rhetoric about becoming “strategic partners” with a “seat at the table” where the business decisions that matter are made, most human-resources professionals aren’t nearly there. They have no seat, and the table is locked inside a conference room to which they have no key. HR people are, for most practical purposes, neither strategic nor leaders.
I don’t care for Las Vegas. And if it’s not clear already, I don’t like HR, either, which is why I’m here. The human-resources trade long ago proved itself, at best, a necessary evil — and at worst, a dark bureaucratic force that blindly enforces nonsensical rules, resists creativity, and impedes constructive change. HR is the corporate function with the greatest potential — the key driver, in theory, of business performance — and also the one that most consistently underdelivers. And I am here to find out why.
Why are annual performance appraisals so time-consuming — and so routinely useless? Why is HR so often a henchman for the chief financial officer, finding ever-more ingenious ways to cut benefits and hack at payroll? Why do its communications — when we can understand them at all — so often flout reality? Why are so many people processes duplicative and wasteful, creating a forest of paperwork for every minor transaction? And why does HR insist on sameness as a proxy for equity?
It’s no wonder that we hate HR. In a 2005 survey by consultancy Hay Group, just 40% of employees commended their companies for retaining high-quality workers. Just 41% agreed that performance evaluations were fair. Only 58% rated their job training as favorable. Most said they had few opportunities for advancement — and that they didn’t know, in any case, what was required to move up. Most telling, only about half of workers below the manager level believed their companies took a genuine interest in their well-being.
None of this is explained immediately in Vegas. These HR folks, from employers across the nation, are neither evil courtiers nor thoughtless automatons. They are mostly smart, engaging people who seem genuinely interested in doing their jobs better. They speak convincingly about employee development and cultural transformation. And, over drinks, they spin some pretty funny yarns of employee weirdnes.
The document provides a book review of "Talent: Making People Your Competitive Advantage" by Edward Lawler III. It summarizes that Lawler argues that talented employees are the main competitive advantage for firms and that HR needs to be redefined from a structure-centric to human capital-centric model. The book covers topics like talent management, organizational redesign, and reinventing HR to integrate it with corporate strategy and make human capital a source of competitive advantage. It concludes that while the future belongs to human capital-centric firms, not all firms have successfully made the transition and its book reminds readers of the need and costs of doing so.
The document discusses evidence-based HR, which is defined as using data and research to support people-related decision making in organizations. It finds that evidence-based HR is still in an early pioneering stage, with major companies only collecting useful datasets for analysis in the past 2-3 years. While executives are increasingly committed to using big data and analytics, the HR function faces perceptions that it lacks credibility in demonstrating connections between HR initiatives and business outcomes. Academics also believe companies overlook much relevant academic research on HR issues. Overall, evidence-based HR faces obstacles but its use is expected to grow as companies recognize benefits like McDonald's did in boosting sales with older frontline employees. HR must adapt to the changing landscape by gaining needed
This document provides information about human resource management trends in the 21st century. It discusses how the role of HR professionals is evolving from administrative tasks to strategic business partners. Motivation and developing talent will be key focus areas for HR. The document also outlines several competency models for HR professionals, including skills related to business management, leadership, change management, and technical expertise. Looking to the future, the document discusses how HR will need to help organizations address issues like attrition, retention, quality, and innovation through new policies and initiatives.
Managing human resources a strategic prospectiveKULDEEP MATHUR
The document discusses the evolving role of human resource management (HRM) from an administrative function to a strategic business partner. As organizations increasingly compete through talent, knowledge, and intellectual capital, HRM must help attract, develop, and retain top human capital. This requires HRM to shift from transactional tasks to strategic planning, aligning HR strategies with business goals, and demonstrating value through metrics like productivity, costs, retention, and organizational capabilities. The barriers to strategic HRM include a short-term focus and difficulties quantifying human capital outcomes, but making this transition is critical for organizations to excel in the future.
This document is a collection of thought pieces about changing HR operating models. It discusses the evolution of HR operating models from an operational focus to a strategic focus. While the Ulrich model of shared services, centers of expertise, and business partners has dominated, the pieces argue the future model needs to focus more on effectiveness and adding business value. There is no one-size-fits-all model; the optimal structure depends on business strategy and needs. Moving forward, HR functions must design themselves based on organizational needs and ensure they have the right capabilities.
The document discusses the shifting role of human resource management (HRM) from a support function to a strategic partner. Specifically, it explores Dave Ulrich's model of HRM's four roles - strategic partner, change agent, administrative expert, and employee advocate. Recent trends suggest HRM's role is expanding to include participating in strategy development, ensuring employee alignment with organizational goals, facilitating change management, and using metrics to evaluate HR strategies and drive improvement. While this strategic role has benefits, it also faces challenges, such as resistance from management and maintaining operational HR functions.
Why HR needs to shed its Toby Flenderson image?Pradeep Sahay
HR needs to shed its image as represented by Toby Flenderson in The Office, which is soft-spoken and tells people what not to do. HR is at a crossroads and crippled with an inability to adapt to changing business needs. For HR to provide real business value, it needs to become more business-aligned, financially-oriented, and accountable by focusing on talent management and outcomes rather than administrative activities. The future of HR requires professionals with business, finance, technology, and risk-taking skills who can help organizations adapt to changing economic conditions.
Human Resource (HR) departments are often misunderstood and underutilized, focusing mainly on administrative tasks rather than strategic planning. However, HR can help organizations achieve their strategic goals through human resource management (HRM) and human resource development (HRD). HRM focuses on areas like research, benefits, and labor relations while HRD includes career development, organizational development, and training. Both can provide insights during strategic planning related to selection and staffing, organizational changes, and developing employees' future skills. Involving HR professionals in strategic planning ensures goals are workable, changes consider their impacts, and training supports the strategy.
Dell was facing declining profit margins after cutting PC prices, so it needed to find new ways to cut costs from its already lean operations. As HR managers, they had to decide what actions in the areas of recruiting, hiring, training, compensation, and developing employees could help support Dell's new cost-cutting efforts.
The chapter introduces human resource management (HRM) as both a core part of every manager's job in activities like staffing, as well as a separate staff function that assists all managers. It outlines the manager's HRM responsibilities and HR's strategic role in formulating and executing company strategy.
The document discusses how human resources (HR) departments can transform into strategic business partners. It provides recommendations for HR to develop business acumen, improve service delivery, leverage technology, build personal credibility, and make strategic contributions. HR must understand business issues, restructure client services, implement applicant tracking systems, and establish themselves as leaders to effectively partner with other departments and add value to the organization. Support from top managers is also needed for HR to fully transition into a strategic role.
This document discusses strategic human resource management (SHRM) and the role of human resources as a strategic business partner. It provides definitions of SHRM, including tailoring HR to business strategy and planning HR activities to enable organizational goals. The document outlines four perspectives on SHRM: social/economic context, relationship between SHRM and performance, management style/organization, and relationship between SHRM and capabilities. It discusses models of SHRM and the evolution of HR roles from administrative expert to strategic partner and leader. Finally, it emphasizes the importance of HR integrating people considerations into business strategy formulation and implementation.
3 hr trends that are becoming best practicesTahir Chaudhry
HR is evolving from a transactional role focused on compliance to a strategic business partner. As workplaces become more transparent and technological, HR must change as well. Three trends becoming best practices are: 1) HR professionals partnering with leadership by providing a "human" perspective on decisions; 2) HR using data analytics to assess employees and provide insights for strategy; and 3) Automating routine tasks through HR software to free up time for strategic work. Embracing these changes will help HR grow and companies succeed.
CapTechTalks Webinar Slides June 2024 Donovan Wright.pptxCapitolTechU
Slides from a Capitol Technology University webinar held June 20, 2024. The webinar featured Dr. Donovan Wright, presenting on the Department of Defense Digital Transformation.
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...EduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher, Director of Education and Skills at the OECD presents at the launch of PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Minds, Creative Schools on 18 June 2024.
A Free 200-Page eBook ~ Brain and Mind Exercise.pptxOH TEIK BIN
(A Free eBook comprising 3 Sets of Presentation of a selection of Puzzles, Brain Teasers and Thinking Problems to exercise both the mind and the Right and Left Brain. To help keep the mind and brain fit and healthy. Good for both the young and old alike.
Answers are given for all the puzzles and problems.)
With Metta,
Bro. Oh Teik Bin 🙏🤓🤔🥰
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
إضغ بين إيديكم من أقوى الملازم التي صممتها
ملزمة تشريح الجهاز الهيكلي (نظري 3)
💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
تتميز هذهِ الملزمة بعِدة مُميزات :
1- مُترجمة ترجمة تُناسب جميع المستويات
2- تحتوي على 78 رسم توضيحي لكل كلمة موجودة بالملزمة (لكل كلمة !!!!)
#فهم_ماكو_درخ
3- دقة الكتابة والصور عالية جداً جداً جداً
4- هُنالك بعض المعلومات تم توضيحها بشكل تفصيلي جداً (تُعتبر لدى الطالب أو الطالبة بإنها معلومات مُبهمة ومع ذلك تم توضيح هذهِ المعلومات المُبهمة بشكل تفصيلي جداً
5- الملزمة تشرح نفسها ب نفسها بس تكلك تعال اقراني
6- تحتوي الملزمة في اول سلايد على خارطة تتضمن جميع تفرُعات معلومات الجهاز الهيكلي المذكورة في هذهِ الملزمة
واخيراً هذهِ الملزمة حلالٌ عليكم وإتمنى منكم إن تدعولي بالخير والصحة والعافية فقط
كل التوفيق زملائي وزميلاتي ، زميلكم محمد الذهبي 💊💊
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...TechSoup
Whether you're new to SEO or looking to refine your existing strategies, this webinar will provide you with actionable insights and practical tips to elevate your nonprofit's online presence.
Information and Communication Technology in EducationMJDuyan
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 2)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐈𝐂𝐓 𝐢𝐧 𝐞𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧:
Students will be able to explain the role and impact of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in education. They will understand how ICT tools, such as computers, the internet, and educational software, enhance learning and teaching processes. By exploring various ICT applications, students will recognize how these technologies facilitate access to information, improve communication, support collaboration, and enable personalized learning experiences.
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐬𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐭:
-Students will be able to discuss what constitutes reliable sources on the internet. They will learn to identify key characteristics of trustworthy information, such as credibility, accuracy, and authority. By examining different types of online sources, students will develop skills to evaluate the reliability of websites and content, ensuring they can distinguish between reputable information and misinformation.
Contiguity Of Various Message Forms - Rupam Chandra.pptx
History of hr
1. Human Resource Planning 30.3 11
A
s the role and impact of the HR
profession continue to evolve,
we have reached a critical
crossroad. Together and now,
business leaders and HR professionals have
the opportunity to understand the history
that brings us to our current situation, to
be informed by predictable trends, and to
make the transformation necessary to result
in organizational competitive advantage
and HR functional viability. Over the last
hundred years, the HR profession evolved
dramatically, usually in response to external
conditions. Unquestionably we are chang-
ing—the issue in front of us is whether we
will define that future or simply react to the
changes that continue to occur in the econ-
omy and in our business models.
The Evolution of HR:
Developing HR as an
Internal Consulting
OrganizationRichard M. Vosburgh, Mirage Resorts, MGM MIRAGE
2. 12 Human Resource Planning 30.3
If we do not step forward with compelling HR leadership, the
future will be determined for us. When the June 2005 Business
Week reports “Why HR Gets No Respect,” the August 2005 Fast
Company proclaims “Why We Hate HR,” and the “evil personnel
director” in Dilbert continues to get knowing laughs, something is
going on that the HR profession needs to address. This set of issues
goes beyond the never-ending lamentations about lacking a seat at
the table for the top HR person—this is about the future of HR
in total.
We present a historical review and conclude that HR’s greatest
opportunity is to develop the organizational capability to be a
relevant and respected internal consulting organization focused on
talent. The good news is that the knowledge, skills, and abilities
needed to do this exist now and are teachable. A virtual army of HR
professionals “get this” and are ready, willing, and able to develop
in this way.
“No Respect”
It is laughably easy to characterize HR as the Rodney Dangerfield
of the C-Suite (“I don’t get no respect”). HR is not, however, a
monolithic thing. Some individuals and companies still cling to an
old style of personnel administration and policy police, and some
leaders and companies more fully recognize the connection between
talent and results, and the function of HR is well integrated with the
implementation of business strategy. We know that HR professionals
are experiencing the negative views of the function directly. In a
recent study, Kahnweiler (2006) identified five key challenges faced
by successful HR professionals:
Lack of power;
Walking a tightrope;
Dealing with skeptical customers who view HR negatively;
Vulnerability; and
Being overwhelmed.
In addition, the Society for HR Management (SHRM) Global
Forum report on “The Maturing Profession of Human Resources
Worldwide” (2004) showed that over half (54.8%) of HR
professionals say the most frequently encountered obstacle to
career advancement is HR’s not being held in high esteem by the
organization.
One thing is certain, HR is evolving and the profession will either
be driven reactively by external changes or will more proactively
define its own future. The Bureau of National Affairs (2004) reports
that 38 percent of HR professionals have had responsibilities added
during the preceding year (e.g., monitoring corporate ethics, managing
external partnerships, protecting intellectual capital or knowledge
management). The same report shows that HR staff per 100
employees has remained at 1.0, roughly the same average as for the
last 10 years, regardless of automation, efficiencies, scale, or out-
sourcing. The content of the roles in HR continue to increase and
shift, while resources are constrained. In the face of these growing
responsibilities, we have not developed a way to describe adequately
or consistently our value added in terms of effectiveness, or even
to show significant improvements in efficiency—although it must
be said that enterprise software systems have greatly improved the
ability to report on efficiency improvements.
Sadly, this is not a new lament. More than 25 years ago, a noted
Harvard Business School professor wrote an article entitled “Big
Hat, No Cattle: Managing Human Resources” (Wickham, 1981).
You can guess the point: Despite the external trappings, HR was
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
not delivering “the beef.” Over 10 years ago, an article in Fortune
magazine (Stewart, 1996) began with an uncomplimentary view of
HR as “the last bureaucracy” wherein the author then proposes:
I am describing, of course, your human resources
department, and have a modest proposal: Why not
blow the sucker up? I don’t mean improve HR.
Improvement’s for wimps. I mean abolish it. Deep-six
it. Rub it out; eliminate, toss, obliterate, nuke it; give
it the old heave-ho, force it to walk the plank, turn it
into road kill.
The emotional content of this presentation reveals the gut-level
issues involved.
As HR leaders we are challenged to guide the many changes
needed to continue the HR evolution. It surely looks worth the
effort: The Hackett Group in Best Practices in HR (2004) showed
that companies they defined as having “world class HR” spent 27
percent less per employee annually, spent 31 percent less on total
labor, had 35 percent fewer HR staff per 1,000 employees, and
experienced 61 percent fewer voluntary terminations (see Exhibit
1). So, it is possible to improve both the effectiveness and the
efficiency of HR.
Defining the Problem with HR
HR is at the crossroads we have described for many interrelated
reasons:
HR as a profession does not have the same “grounding” in legally
mandated processes and reporting as does Finance, so there
continues to be more “art” than “science” and much greater
variability in the quality and completeness of how the work is
defined and delivered. In addition, professions like Finance that
have their roots in Accounting (and are grounded in FASB and
many other legal requirements, most recently Sarbanes-Oxley)
have mastered the transactional arena and have continued to
evolve into more of a strategic decision science, for example,
using ROI principles to allow leaders to think about how they
manipulate certain variables to get desired business outcomes
(Boudreau & Ramstad, 2006 and 2007). Arguably, HR has
improved in its ability to deliver efficient transactional processing,
but has not yet grown into a strategic decision science even
though variables like talent in certain positions (right seat on the
bus) or organizational capability and culture in support of business
strategies can have a direct impact on business outcomes.
HR in the C-Suite has not been uniformly accepted. CFO
Research Services (2003) found that HR reports to the CEO in
only about 52 percent of companies. HR reports to the COO
1.
2.
Exhibit 1
HR Best Practices Pay Off
Industry Median
World Class HR 25% 50% 75% 100%
Per employee spend
Total labor spend
HR staff per 1,000 employees
Voluntary terminations
-27%
-31%
-35%
-61%
3. Human Resource Planning 30.3 13
in about 17 percent and to the CFO in about 13 percent of
the cases. In addition, boards of directors have differed widely
in the extent of their utilization of the HR leader in the strategy
of the organization.
The role of HR as a function within organizations might best be
described as a scattergram. There are huge variations by industry,
global geography, and CEO preferences on what HR is asked to
do. One cannot attend most HR conferences without smelling
the inferiority complex inherent in the “how do we get a seat at
the table” kinds of topics. When one hears of “outsourcing HR”
and delves into it, one finds that the HR elements that can be
outsourced are really the transactional and administrative part
of HR, not the other more strategic and value-added parts that
relate to business partner and change agent roles (the transfor-
mational business relevant part).
HR as a personal skill set must also continue to grow and
develop. The activities and skills to deliver the transactional
parts of HR are quite different than those required to deliver the
transformational parts of HR. “Letting go” of the transactional
part can be personally pretty scary when one’s value in the past
was “how quickly I can go do what you asked me to do.” When
either an outsourced agency or manager and employee self-service
systems handle those issues, then what is left for me to do? The
truth is, some HR people should migrate toward the delivery of
those outsourced transactional services because that fits better
with their skills and interests; others should develop the internal
consulting skill sets that enable the transformational part of HR.
Many organizations are struggling with this now, or will be in
the near future.
The role of HR as policy police has to be put on the table. In
mid-2005, Fast Company ran an article entitled “Why We Hate
HR” in which Keith Hammonds laid out some facts and drew
3.
4.
5.
some journalistically sensational conclusions. He describes HR
as a “henchmen for the chief financial officer” and as a “dark
bureaucratic force that blindly enforces nonsensical rules, resists
creativity, and impedes constructive change.” Wow, he must have
had a bad day. For many people the article simply rang true, and
as the success of the evil HR Director in Dilbert also attests, we
cannot afford to dismiss this caricature too quickly. Yes, HR
must represent defensible policies to keep the organization in
compliance, but that is not all they must do.
Taken together, these observations present the HR profession
with some real challenges (summarized in Exhibit 2). At the heart of
it, HR must get relevant now or risk continued marginalization.
These are huge challenges and the fate of our profession rests in
the balance, but these challenges can be met and mastered. We have
the talent and the motivation. Now we need a roadmap, which the
remainder of this article attempts to provide through the following
topics:
Evolution of HR Accountabilities—using the Ulrich model and
other research to show “where we have been” and where we
need to be headed.
HR as an Internal Consulting Organization—showing how
this future roadmap is consistent with where boards and CEOs
expect HR to make a contribution.
Outsourcing Transactions and Insourcing Transformations—
exploring more deeply what it means to be an internal consulting
organization.
Content Areas for Internal Consulting—internal consulting is a
process; this section addresses the right value-added content on
which to work.
First Steps—Strategy, Structure, and Skills—“how to” transform
HR in an organization.
Evolution of HR Accountabilities
HR has evolved over the last hundred years in reaction to significant
changes in the way organizations get their work done. Putting the
evolution of business and the evolution of the HR name changes
into one table (Exhibit 3) shows how reactive the profession has
been to changes in the social and economic realities of the time.
The challenge for HR today is to define our own future based on
the trends that are eminently predictable now and to step up to the
challenge of creating our own future.
One other key historical point: The boom and bust economic
history of the last 20+ years has formed in large part what HR was
asked to support. The HR function went from being challenged
with creative recruitment, retention, and compensation strategies
during boom times to being challenged with creative restructuring,
downsizing, and outplacement during bust times and in the latest
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Some HR people should migrate toward the delivery
of those outsourced transactional services because that
fits better with their skills and interests; others should
develop the internal consulting skill sets that enable the
transformational part of HR.
Exhibit 2
HR Challenges
Profession
Art vs. Science
Influence
Boardroom vs.
Department
Skills
Transactional vs.
Tranformational
Perception
Enforcer vs. Advocate
HR
Challenges
4. 14 Human Resource Planning 30.3
wave of mergers and acquisitions. The HR priorities during these
“bust” times were not conducive to discussions of talent and hot
spots: They were more about survival and cost-cutting efficiencies.
HR has reactively dealt with the evolving business issues but has
rarely independently implemented “game changing strategies” for
the function or for employees. HR too often reacts to a problem
or request, and has too rarely anticipated issues and proposed
solutions. We in HR did not strategically design the changing
“deal” between employers and employees, but we were the ones
to alter the pensions and benefits, and to execute downsizing and
restructuring. It is one thing to be service oriented (which HR must
be); it is another to be a simple order taker. The evolution we are
undergoing requires not only the intellectual and strategic capability
to envision a different role, but also the intestinal fortitude to step
out, lead, and enact a new role.
Just as the role of the HR professional has changed over the
years of this business evolution, so too has the role of the line
manager. There continues to be a shift in the activities and account-
abilities we expect managers to own based on their management
role, what we expect leaders to own in their leadership roles, and
what we expect employees to own as they take on greater respon-
sibility for their own learning, growth, and self-management. HR
can be the professional HR process designer and owner, and oversee
implementation and rollup reporting, but in most cases the “work”
of the process is done by employees and managers (e.g., recruiting,
selection, performance appraisal, career development, succession
planning, merit increases, stock option distributions). So, who is
accountable: the leader, manager, employee, or HR? All have a
stake in the success of these processes but companies vary greatly
in the extent to which these performance expectations are made
explicit as part of a manager’s job.
This evolution has one other common link. Throughout the
development of the HR profession, there has been a tension
between the roles of “employee advocate” and “business leader.”
This is a razor’s-edge predicament. HR must serve the needs of
the business (and, for example, must plan and enact downsizing
and outplacement) while serving the needs of employees (to be the
fair and impartial third-party advocate and ombudsman where
needed). Sometimes those two hats are hard to wear at the same
time; yet, the recent egregious failures and lapses by leaders of large
companies in areas like compensation and people management have
shown that HR must be ready to step up to the real issues of ethics
in organizations and integrity in leadership. To be a great business
partner does not mean to be co-opted; sometimes we are the ones
who must blow the whistle.
The “Extended” Ulrich Model
The most well articulated and accepted model for modern HR
was presented by Dave Ulrich in his 1997 book Human Resource
Champions. Ten years later, the model still works well (and he
extended it with his 2005 book, The HR Value Proposition).
Ulrich presents a simple 2x2 model, in which the horizontal axis
is a focus on either process or people and the vertical axis is a
day-to-day operational focus or a future-strategic focus (see Exhibit
4). In the lower left quadrant (process and operational focus) is the
administrative expert role; in the lower right quadrant (people and
operational focus) is the employee relations expert role; in the upper
left (process and strategic focus) is the strategic partner role; and in
the upper right (people and strategic focus) is the change agent role.
This focus on changing roles has provided a vocabulary to allow a
deeper discussion of the evolution that is occurring in HR. Nobody
would argue that the day-to-day operational focus is not important.
When this is done well, nobody notices; yet, if it is fouled up it leads
to a lot of attention, lawsuits, or even front-page headlines. This is
also most often the content for the “outsourcing of HR.”
Let us take some license with Ulrich’s model by adding more
detail. The four role definitions are fully described in the HR
Champions book, to which we have added the further detail of
Exhibit 3
The Reactivity of HR in Its Evolution
Decade Business Realities HR Name Changes Issues
Pre-1900 Small Business & Guilds Did not yet even exist Owners owned the HR issues
1900 Industrial Revolution Labor Relations People as interchangeable parts
1920 Civil Service & WWI Industrial Relations Workers’ rights and more formalized processes
1940 Scientific Management & WWII Personnel Administration Efficiency experts and more highly evolved HR
processes
1960 Civil Rights & Compliance Personnel Legal compliance and reporting; “policy police”
1980 Human Relations, the Knowledge/
Service Economy, and Mergers &
Acquisitions
Human Resources
People
Relevance in a fast-changing world; motivation and
“human relations” theories abound
2000 Modern Organizations Organization Effectiveness?
Human Capital?
Organizational Capability?
No new official names, but lots of “morphing”
as the transactional parts get outsourced and the
transformational parts get defined
2010 Global Economy and E-Enabled
Technologies
TBD Still Evolving, Focus on Talent; Capability; Culture;
Consulting—Challenged to Be an Effective Internal
Consulting Organization
5. Human Resource Planning 30.3 15
16 accountabilities for which HR is typically held responsible. In
Exhibit 4, we have sorted these 16 accountabilities into the four
roles so we can explore and differentiate the transactional parts of
HR (ripe for outsourcing in some way) and the transformational
parts of HR (essential for adding value to the organization, and key
to the internal consulting role).
In addition, the 16 accountabilities can be placed on a graph
in which the horizontal axis is time (over the last 100 years) and
the vertical axis represents HR’s impact on or contribution to
the business (from limiting liability and protecting against the
downside of usually legally mandated things, up to adding value
and maximizing the upside of a strategically differentiated employment
proposition). Exhibit 5 shows the result of this analysis; note that
the author published an earlier version of this summary (Vosburgh,
2004).
Some important caveats are relevant as we explore Exhibits 4
and 5:
Within any of the 16 accountabilities are elements of both the
strategic and transactional; as with most models, this is an
oversimplification (consider, for example, the 5 percent strategic
work in compensation that carries 95 percent of the impact
versus the 95 percent of the volume work that is more admin-
istrative—administrative work can be outsourced, but most
organizations would internally hold dear the design work);
All of the 16 are important and their placement in the exhibits
does not indicate relative importance;
The two-dimensional picture itself is too linear and cannot
adequately show the myriad inter-relationships and multidimen-
sional complexity that exist among these accountabilities; and
Key issues such as diversity, inclusion, and ethics weave through
all these topics in substantial ways.
Exhibit 5 shows that over time (100 years), the name of
the function has evolved in step with the kinds of account-
abilities expected of us. Today it is a world of AND: Having to
do the lower-left legally required transactional parts AND the
upper-right value-added transformational parts of HR. Note that
1.
2.
3.
4.
the lower-left accountabilities tend
to be the “hygiene factors” that
if done perfectly are not noticed,
but if messed up will attract a
lot of attention. In contrast, the
upper-right accountabilities tend
to be the ones that when done
well give the organization a great
strategic advantage. When they are
not done well, many often do not
notice, largely because organiza-
tions vary so greatly in the ways
they define HR and their strategic
expectations of it. This is, unfor-
tunately, part of the indictment of
HR: Opportunities for impacting
business results are not always
recognized or acted upon.
The “lower left” content repre-
sents important technical expertise
that often can be delivered in trans-
actional kinds of ways. The “upper
right” content also requires techni-
cal expertise, but can be delivered
only if the HR professional has established a level of internal
consulting skills and personal credibility. An obvious analogy
can be drawn with the success profile of an externally focused
consultant within a professional services firm. The client expects
the technical knowledge but is only really “won over” when
consulting skills and personal credibility leads to trusted advisor
status. This important parallel is explored later in more detail.
Research Support from Others
Others have explored this HR evolution issue and drawn
somewhat similar conclusions, particularly as they regard business
impact. Jay Jamrog and Miles Overholt (2004) explored the “past,
present, and future” of HR in “Building a Strategic HR Function.”
They concluded that for HR to continue to evolve, we need to put
far more emphasis on human capital as the differentiator. They
argued that a key competency we must develop is the ability to
measure organizational effectiveness. This requires HR professionals
to think, act, and measure in more of a systems way (how actions
create outcomes that we care about)—another way of saying we
need to progress in our ability to be a “decision science” by measuring
the right things, and to be more effective internal consultants.
Similarly, Ed Gubman (2004) explored “HR Strategy and
Planning: From Birth to Business Results,” also concluding that HR
must start to measure its impact on business outcomes rather than
HR activities, with greater focus on customer and market growth
rather than on cost reductions and efficiency measures.
Even Wikipedia (2007) defines the objective of HR “to maximize
the return on investment from the organization’s human capital,”
yet few HR organizations have the kind of metrics that can support
that objective.
Perhaps the most complete and ongoing research and writing
on this HR evolution topic comes from John Boudreau and Pete
Ramstad (2007). The first chapter of their book (Beyond HR:
The New Science of Human Capital) is entitled “The Essential
Evolution: Personnel, Human Resources, Talentship.” They call for
a shift from a focus on the services that HR provides to the decisions
Exhibit 4
Four Roles and Sixteen Accountabilities
Strategic Partner
Strategic HR Planning
HR as Business Partner
Culture and Image
Change Agent
Staffing & Talent Management
Organizational Design
Survey Action Planning
Performance Management
Training and Development
Administrative Expert
Compensation
Benefits
HR Information Systems
Compliance
Employee Relations Expert
Employee Relations
Labor Relations
Safety & Workers’ Compensation
Diversity and EEO
processes people
day-to-day operational focus
future/strategic focus
6. 16 Human Resource Planning 30.3
that HR informs and supports. Specifically, they argue “the mission
of the HR function is to increase the success of the organization by
improving decisions that depend on or impact people” (p. 9). That
is actually more complex than it appears on first consideration, but
they go on to give many examples of how the HR profession can
seize the opportunity to become more of a decision science that is
focused more squarely on talent.
Research also shows a disconnect between how far we think
we have come as a profession and how far we have really come.
Lawler, et al. (2006), report an interesting finding in a longitudinal
study that was repeated in 1995, 2001, and 2004. In 2004, HR
professionals reported that compared to five to seven years earlier,
they were spending much more time as a strategic business partner
(23.5% vs. 9.6%) and far less time maintaining records (13.2% vs.
25.9%). This would be reason for optimism if not for the fact that
the actual percentage of time reported when the study was done all
three times shows almost no change in the amount of time spent as
a strategic business partner (21.9%, 23.2%, and 23.3%) or on
maintaining records (15.4%, 14.9%, and 13.4%). We want to
believe we have advanced, but the facts state otherwise. This finding
provides a significant note of caution regarding declaring victory in
our HR evolution too quickly!
The Global Perspective on HR Evolution
The global picture of the development of HR over time is also
compelling. Recent McKinsey research (Lawson, et al., 2005) found
that “European companies appear to be struggling to find human
resources professionals with the right mix of skills to support
business unit managers” (p. 13). They found problems both with
the “inefficient and ineffective delivery of HR services” and with
the “service focused skills in order to become a true partner of the
business” (p. 14). They concluded that “To deliver on what the
business needs, HR must put its own house in order, starting with
the skills and capabilities of its staff” (p. 14). Similarly, Bear (2005)
concludes that “the stages of HR evolution differ globally” (p.
9), with many structures still led by “personnel administration”
officials with a heavy focus on union relations.
In addition, some fast-growing Asian countries, such as China,
do not yet have one generation’s experience with the free enterprise
system and HR beyond personnel administration. Before China
opened up to the West, “personnel” often acted as the Communist
Party’s spies within the state-owned companies. Talk about “policy
Exhibit 5
HR Continues to Evolve
Labor Employee Personnel Human Organizational
Relations Relations Resources Effectiveness
Add Value &
Maximize
Upside
Limit Liability
& Protect
Downside
Impact/ContributiontotheBusiness
A Century of Evolution in the Function
Strategic HR
Planning
Culture
& Image
HR as
Business Partner
Organizational
Design
Staffing & Talent
Management
Diversity
& EEO
Performance
Management
HR Information
Systems (HRIS)
Survey Action
Planning
Training &
Development
Compensation
Employee
Relations
Benefits
Labor/Union
Relations
Safety & Workers’
Compensation
Compliance
7. Human Resource Planning 30.3 17
Exhibit 6
The HR Effectiveness Pyramid:
Developing HR as an Internal Consulting Organization*
Capability
Realization of Skills to Benefit
Managing Expectations
Shared Crisis
Resolution
Demonstrated
Successes
Preferred
Partner
Trusted
Advisor
Org.
Culture
HR
Strategy
Org.
Capability
Talent:
Right Seat
On the Bus
Renewal:
Growth &
Development
Innovation:
Creative
Continuous
Improvement
Business
Strategy
Industry
Organization
People
Financial Acumen
Business Savvy
Operations Knowledge
Customers
Competitors
Partners
Business Knowledge
Training & Development
Compensation
Benefits
HR Info Systems
Emp. Communications
Legal Compliance
Labor Relations
Employee Relations
Staffing
Diversity & EEO
Performance Mgt.
Succession Planning
HR Functional Knowledge
Skills Content Roles
TransactionalSkills
InternalConsultingSkills
StrategicPartner&
ChangeAgent
Emp.Rel.Expert
Admin.Expert
*Adapted from work by the author with
McMann & Ransford
(www.mcmannransford.com) in 2006
8. 18 Human Resource Planning 30.3
police”! This leads to the current high reliance on Mandarin-speak-
ing Chinese-descent expatriates from Hong Kong, Singapore, and
elsewhere to handle HR duties while a new generation of Chinese
nationals gets their experience levels up.
India’s explosion as the “back office to the world” of necessity
led to quick development of broad-based selection and training
systems, benefiting from hundreds of years of history as a British
colony operating in a free enterprise system—so with more of an
infrastructure on which to build. If anything, the global picture of
the issues facing HR is an even more dramatic enactment of our
conclusion that HR must deliver both the basic operational services
in an efficient, scalable, low-cost way and deliver the internal con-
sulting role that provides business relevant HR solutions.
HR as an Internal Consulting Organization
Bottom line, for HR to address its most compelling challenges,
the one common hurdle is that HR must first ensure that the trans-
actional and legally mandated parts of the HR job are managed in
some way, then the “big leap” opportunity is to develop the strategy,
structure and skills to evolve into an effective internal consulting
organization that addresses talent and strategic, change-oriented
issues. The good news is that these are learnable skills, there is an
established body of knowledge and experience regarding external
consulting effectiveness that can be applied to the development of
the HR professional, and many HR professionals are poised as
“ready, willing, and able” to make this transformation. The bad
news is that few organizations are teaching their HR professionals
these necessary skills, or evolving their strategy and structure to
take the next step.
Our graduate programs in HR and related disciplines such as
industrial/organizational psychology also have not kept up with
some key content areas. When I went to graduate school (many
years ago!), we asked the faculty to give us a class on executive
presentation skills, because that seemed hugely missing and our
ability to be successful in the real world organizational setting
pivoted fairly quickly on that capability. Our graduate students
today should be clamoring for consulting skills training.
Professional services firms and consulting organizations of all
types have created and institutionalized programs to train their
externally facing consultants to develop the client relationships
that lead to “preferred partner” status in the eyes of the customer.
Our model (see Exhibit 6) shows that there is an easy transition
in adapting these programs to help our HR professionals reach
“trusted advisor” status with their internal clients.
The smaller pyramid on the left indicates additional steps that
can be taught to any consultant; the larger pyramid focuses on the
HR internal consultant specifically. Going up the larger pyramid,
a person must first master the HR functional accountabilities and
do so with the business knowledge that makes the actions relevant
to the organization. The lower sections of the pyramid are the
“price of admission” and are related to the concept of operational
excellence: keeping the trains running. Above that is what we term
transformational excellence: applied internal consulting. If HR
delivers on all this, then the top of the pyramid is the attainment
of trusted advisor status within your organization. As one example,
a review of the SHRM certification content shows that most of
the current HR training available externally addresses the HR
functional knowledge part of the pyramid—this is a necessary but
not sufficient condition for success.
Internal Consulting Is Consistent with What Boards and
CEOs Expect of HR
What do boards and CEOs expect of HR? Surprisingly, not much
research has been done to answer this question. A recent study was
conducted by Ed Lawler and John Boudreau of the University of
Southern California’s Center for Effective Organizations. The fund-
ing was partly from the Human Resource Planning Society (www.
hrps.org), and the results are published in the Human Resource
Planning journal (2006), entitled “HR Support for Corporate
Boards.” Input from over 100 HR senior executives and over 75
non-HR executives provided the data. One key conclusion was that
boards and CEOs are limited by their own experiences as to what
they expect of HR, so they tend to ask for input on areas in which
they are more historically comfortable (e.g., executive compensation
and succession planning). So, what boards expect and what they
should expect from HR are two separate things.
Areas of HR contribution that correlated most strongly with the
board’s belief that “HR meets our needs” were in the upper trans-
formational section of our Exhibit 6 pyramid: HR drives change
management, has a human capital strategy that is integrated with
business strategy, partners with line management in developing
business strategy, and makes rigorous data-based decisions about
human capital management. Sounds like great internal consulting!
In the design of HR organizations, the features that correlated
most strongly with the board’s belief that “HR meets our needs”
were:
HR service teams that represent centers of excellence as opposed
to decentralized HR—one key to the “structure” that can support
developing HR as an internal consulting organization; and
Information technology systems that provide relevant data for
decision making—essential in the lower transactional parts of
the pyramid, but also can provide important data for the strategic
analysis required in the upper transformational parts of the
pyramid.
Within HR metrics and analytics, the capabilities that correlated
most strongly with the board’s belief that “HR meets our needs”
were all about “upper quadrant” talent and strategy:
Identifying where talent has the greatest potential for strategic
impact;
Making decisions and recommendations that reflect the
competitive situation;
Contributing to decisions about business strategy and human
capital management; and
Assessing the feasibility of new business strategies.
With all this attention on strategy, one must not lose sight of
basic execution. In reviewing HR skills ratings by non-HR execu-
tives, the one skill that correlated most strongly with their belief
that “HR meets our needs” was “process execution and analysis,”
the basic “keep the trains running” kind of expectation.
The authors observed that HR is generally responsive to board
requests for information, but rarely proactive about “marketing”
the information they may have that would be relevant to some of
the areas described here. If the board has no insight into the avail-
ability or relevance of these kinds of information, it tends to ask
for the traditional information only (e.g., executive compensation
and succession planning). By the preceding lists, the boards clearly
value the strategic business partner and change agent roles that
1.
2.
1.
2.
3.
4.
9. Human Resource Planning 30.3 19
reflect internal consulting but also expect execution of the basic
processes.
Outsourcing Transactions and Insourcing
Transformations
The simplest roadmap feature of this HR evolution is the insight
that strength comes in outsourcing transactions and insourcing
transformations. That means we need to get better at a new set
of skills. On the transactions side, this often means managing
outsourced vendors to service level agreements, leaving HR with
the client manager role (AKA consultant). On the transformation
side, the new skills are the internal consulting skills that relate to
the business partner and change agent roles.
Outsourcing Transactions
Returning to the bottom part of the HR effectiveness
pyramid (Exhibit 6), the delivery of HR tools, processes, and
systems accounts for 18 percent of the impact of HR on business
performance, and effectively using HR technology accounts for
5 percent of the impact (Ulrich & Brockbank, 2005). This is the
lower area of the pyramid that, if done perfectly, nobody notices,
and it adds nothing to the strategic advantage of the organization;
however, when there are problems in execution, this area can get ALL
the attention and undermine other efforts toward more strategic
contributions. Some problems in basic execution (pay, EEO, labor
relations, safety) can land someone on the front page of the head-
lines and create huge morale problems internally. In the end, the
operational and transactional aspects of HR need to be handled
well and completely. No matter what other strategic and transfor-
mational work is being done, the trains still need to run on time.
This area may offer opportunities for manager and employee
self-service web-based support, low-cost back office “contact
HR” support centers, or outsourcing of basic services. Whatever
approach is taken, the solution should be highly efficient and
scalable so the infrastructure costs can remain relatively constant as
the organization grows. The processes that managers need to spend
time on should be greatly simplified and automated; for example:
goal setting, performance planning and feedback, appraisals, and
salary administration. There are many current examples in the mar-
ketplace of software solutions designed to simplify these processes.
To be effective in this “lower part of the pyramid,” one must be:
Seen as knowing the business—one’s industry, one’s company—
and possessing the financial acumen to understand the “gives
and takes” of business decision making;
Seen as a business person first (with a general manager mindset),
and as a functional expert second;
Aware of the analyst reports on one’s company and what, in
their view, is creating shareholder value or holding the company
back from it;
1.
2.
3.
Knowledgeable about both competitors and customers.
When HR is seen as operating from this point of view, HR is taken
much more seriously “at the table.”
The alternative to doing it yourself internally is to outsource
many of these transactional HR services. Rather than needing skills
in direct delivery of services, the HR professional now needs a
different set of skills (and acronyms!):
Human resources outsourcing (HRO): Specifying which services
to outsource;
Business process outsourcing (BPO): Agreeing on exactly what
activities will be outsourced and what will be retained internally;
Request for proposal (RFP): Reviewing multiple providers and
deciding on a partner;
Statement of work (SOW): Clarity on exactly what services are
provided;
Service level agreements (SLA): Metrics to measure, report, and
hold accountable;
Recruiting process outsourcing (RPO): Sourcing, managing and
retaining talent;
Learning process outsourcing (LPO): For training and develop-
ment systems.
Transitioning to a new method of delivery means taking over a
“client manager” role with the internal clients that HR supports. It
is essential to involve key business partners in this transition so they
understand and support internal HR in its new role.
Insourcing Transformations via Internal Consulting Skills
Turn to the “upper part” of the HR effectiveness pyramid
(Exhibit 6). To be a strong internal consultant, business partner,
or change agent, one must first have personal credibility. Research
shows that personal credibility accounts for close to one quarter of
HR’s impact on business performance (Ulrich & Brockbank, 2005).
Note that the following characteristics also represent the character-
istics of personal credibility inherent in a successful consultant:
Effective interpersonal relationships and skills (emotional intel-
ligence);
Understanding the issues and delivering the results;
Great communication skills: up, down, across, inside, and
outside; and
A reputation for meeting commitments (say what you mean and
do what you say).
Internal consulting involves selling services. “Selling” HR inter-
ventions is unique and different from other types of selling, yet
the internal consulting role has many things in common with the
external selling of professional services. Both situations deal with
the art of agreeing on intangibles in ways in which both parties
comprehend the issues and possible solutions and are happy with
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
1.
2.
3.
4.
In the end, the operational and transactional aspects of
HR need to be handled well and completely. No matter
what other strategic and transformational work is being
done, the trains still need to run on time.
10. 20 Human Resource Planning 30.3
the agreement. The goal is to develop long-term client relationships,
not just big one-hit deals. This type of sale is accomplished by
taking the role of an advisor and becoming trusted in that role. In
addition to the personal chemistry and rapport that is needed, this
work requires three things:
Creating solutions that work;
Educating clients on what is possible; and
Operating successfully in an ever-changing environment.
An analogy can be drawn to the business of professional
services organizations. For HR, becoming relevant may lay in fully
understanding and applying the things that professional services
organizations already know about creating strong and abiding
relationships as externally focused consultants, leading to trusted
advisor status. Just as this is the goal for externally focused revenue-
generating businesses in professional services, so this could also be
the goal for internally focused HR organizations that are committed
to helping their internal clients become more successful in the revenue
and profit goals that they must deliver.
The skills that support consulting effectiveness are known and
well tested. For example, one consulting organization has for years
supported those three capabilities through programs called Service
Chains™, Taking Ideas to Market™, and Role Selling™ (McMann,
2007). HR has not yet evolved into the “science” that even effective
management consulting has developed, yet these are the new skills
required of HR professionals in organizations. One can simply not
be a business partner and change agent without exhibiting these
internal consulting skills. These are knowable and teachable. They
are the “how” of the work; the “what” will vary with the situation
and rely on the technical knowledge of the HR professional. So,
the technical knowledge of the specialty areas in HR is a necessary
but not sufficient condition for success in the eyes of one’s internal
clients.
To be an effective internal consultant, both content knowledge
and style are important. Regarding content knowledge, it helps to
have had experience with organizational change from a variety of
perspectives (strategy shifts, mergers, acquisitions, spinoffs), and
to have a point of view well beyond structure changes. It helps to
have models that can be shared with the organization to allow others
to think about organizational change and engage in supporting it.
There are many such models, with management gurus such as John
Kotter (1996), Rosabeth Moss Kanter (1983), William Bridges
(2003), Warren Bennis (1995), W. Warner Burke (2002), and Ed
Schein (2004), providing excellent time-tested guidance. Classic
models such as the McKinsey 7-S Model (Peters & Waterman,
1982), which take a dynamic systems view, have withstood the test
of time. Pick one that works for you and your business that resonates
with your current situation. A model gives managers a common
1.
2.
3.
vocabulary to talk about the change and guides them in how to
engage employees to be part of the change, rather than feeling like
something scary is being imposed from above. Effective internal
consultants and change agents have a blend of political skills, system
skills, analytic skills, people skills, and business skills.
Internal consultant, business partner, change agent—All relate
to each other based on common skill sets and bodies of knowledge.
Much is known and teachable in this area that would allow HR
professionals to become more effective in the transformational area
of their accountabilities, yet, it is rarely part of their basic training
in either organizations or graduate university HR programs
(Ramlall & Sheppeck, 2006). That needs to change.
Content Areas for Internal Consulting
Both general internal consulting skills and specific technical
knowledge are needed for effectiveness. Six content areas in
which HR can make the greatest impact on organizational success
include:
HR Strategy Aligned to Business Strategy;
Talent: Right Seat on the Bus;
Organizational Capability: Delivering Business Results;
Organizational Culture: Mirroring the Customer’s Value
Proposition;
Renewal: Growth and Development;
Innovation: Creative, Continuous Improvement.
All of these require internal consulting skills to maximize the
success of the HR professional. The focus of this article is on the
development of HR as an internal consulting organization, so not all
these content areas are reviewed here. The first two areas are briefly
summarized to give an example of how the internal consulting skills
contribute to the content area. One thing is clear: These are not the
functional areas in which HR is traditionally structured.
HR Strategy Aligned to Business Strategy
Contribution to business strategy is HR’s highest calling and
greatest opportunity for impact, accounting for 43 percent of
HR’s impact on business performance, with business knowledge
accounting for another 11 percent (Ulrich & Brockbank, 2005).
Taken together, these form the area in which HR has the greatest
opportunity to develop. This requires stepping back from the
day-to-day delivery of services and reactionary fire-fighting to
engage with business leaders in a different way.
Most organizations have some formal way to develop business
strategies. The finance function almost always directly connects
to the strategy work because of the obvious budget implications.
The HR function has varied dramatically in the extent to which it
provides an equally compelling connection to the business strategy
work—for example, by exploring with the business leaders the HR
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Organizational culture and capability (HR domain) can
have as much impact on business strategy attainment, espe-
cially in areas like customer support, as does the budget
(the finance domain). The challenge is to claim it, have the
right conversations on these topics, and watch the impact.
11. Human Resource Planning 30.3 21
implications of the business strategy. As a positive example, one
deceptively simple part of the PepsiCo Human Resource Planning
process in the 1980s was the page with two columns: “Business
Strategy” and “HR Implications.” By making this a required page
for each function and the company as a whole, it transformed and
elevated the discussion into one that propelled HR into a strategic
internal consulting role. To assist others in doing this, refer to
Exhibit 7 as an example of the kinds of questions internal HR
consultants should explore with the business leaders they support.
The list could be longer, and can involve any and every lever
that is within HR’s traditional domain, or it can go well beyond the
boundaries of traditional HR, for example:
Opening up internal leadership and development programs to
customers to build relationships;
Including customers in the design of sales incentive programs;
or
Implementing a more effective senior leadership team agenda.
The point is that organizational culture and capability (HR
domain) can have as much impact on business strategy attainment,
especially in areas like customer support, as does the budget (the
finance domain). The challenge is to claim it, have the right conver-
sations on these topics, and watch the impact.
Talent: Right Seat on the Bus
Jim Collins (2001), in From Good to Great, clearly describes
the critical importance to organizational success of having the right
people on the bus, and having those people in the right seats based
on their talent. Buckingham and Vosburgh (2001) further explored
this in an article entitled “The 21st Century Human Resources
1.
2.
3.
Function: It’s the Talent, Stupid!” Consider also McKinsey’s classic
1997 report and later book (Michaels, et al, 2001) on The War for
Talent; clearly this is a prime area HR must own and leverage.
Combine increasing talent shortages with looming demographic
trends, the changing work life balance expectations of the up and
coming workforce, and the changes in the organizational “deal”
with employees, and we have a ticking time bomb. Organizations
that understand this evolution and develop unique talent strategies
will win the game, with or without the help of the traditional
HR function in the organization. General managers whose success
depends on meeting client needs with talented employees will
no doubt lead the charge if HR as a function does not step up to
the plate.
If indeed “It’s the Talent, Stupid,” then HR practice needs to
explore more deeply how talent is ignited within organizations.
Lynda Gratton’s recent work on Hot Spots (Gratton, 2007) illumi-
nates why some teams, workplaces, and organizations buzz with
energy and others do not. One can feel the difference when walking
into a place that has it versus one that does not. She gives great
advice on how leaders can help create and support hot spots, where
creativity and energy deliver business results, and how HR can help
design organizations that have people who are (1) eager to cooper-
ate, (2) across boundaries (3) with an igniting purpose—the three
essential elements. This goes well beyond traditional organizational
development practice, with implications for selection, training,
rewards, engagement, and leadership development. It is a wave we
cannot afford to miss.
How can HR better manage talent in an organization?
Exhibit 7
Aligning HR Strategies to Business Strategies
Leadership: Do we have the leadership in place that can deliver this business strategy? If not, what needs to change? Is the “leadership
structure” right to deliver the strategy? Do employees rate their senior leaders highly on being in touch and effective?
Culture: Does our internal employee culture line up in support of the external customer marketing messages? The two should be a
mirror image. If we promise our customers “speed, agility, and innovation” do we practice that internally as well; e.g., is our culture all
about “speed, agility, and innovation”? How does that show up every day? Have we provided the “vocabulary” of how to talk about
the culture in a way that focused choices can be made that shows up in our mission, vision, and values? Would employees state that our
organization has a clearly defined culture?
Communication & Engagement: Both “top down” and even more importantly, “bottoms up”: Are people feeling actively informed,
involved and engaged? Do employees feel like their voice is heard?
Workforce Planning: Do we have the right numbers of people with the right skill sets in the right place at the right time to deliver on the
business strategy? What needs to change?
Talent: Does the business strategy require some new type of talent? How will we develop or acquire that talent? If we are to develop
the talent, what training and development processes are needed? If we are to acquire talent, what recruitment processes are needed? Do
employees feel that they can use their most valued skills and abilities?
Retention: Will turnover undermine the business strategy? Rather than trying to fix “all turnover,” where is the turnover that will most
affect delivery of the business strategy? What needs to change in leadership, working conditions, or pay to have an impact on retention?
Do employees feel like they are valued and that they make a difference for the company?
Performance Management: Have the tools and processes for performance management been revised to reflect this year’s business strat-
egy? What might that look like? Should everyone in the organization share one or two goals in common? Do people have “line of sight”
between what they do every day and the business strategy? How can HR contribute to large scale performance improvement programs
(such as GE’s Work-Out, Change Acceleration, or Six Sigma programs)?
Team Development: Are the spaces between boundaries being managed well? Is the work within and between teams progressing smoothly?
What could improve effectiveness across the entire cycle of work so the customer notices the difference?
12. 22 Human Resource Planning 30.3
Make it a priority but keep it simple. The CEO and senior leaders
need to believe it, talk it, and walk it.
Link talent to business strategies. Show the connection in
multiple compelling ways.
Develop disciplined systems for assessment. Require leaders to
know their people’s talents and conduct regular reviews (e.g.,
quarterly updates) as well as an annual deep dive.
Use the data. Integrate talent assessments and organizational
needs back into internal search or recruitment, retention and
motivation programs, professional and leadership development
programs, performance management, and workforce planning.
First Steps: Strategy, Structure, and Skills
Bottom line, HR’s challenges include delivering the transactional
and administrative services required in a low cost way (requiring
the HR functional knowledge and the business knowledge in the
lower part of the Exhibit 6 pyramid), and delivering the more
transformational business partner and change agent roles that are
depicted in the upper part of the Exhibit 6 pyramid. Technical,
functional, and business skills will always be important and are the
price of admission, but the development of internal consulting skills
is essential to delivering on the total HR promise. These skills will
lead to the development of trusted advisor status for HR.
At least three initial steps can be taken to develop HR as an
internal consulting organization:
HR Strategy Aligned to Business Priorities—As described in the
preceding section.
HR Structure via Centers of Excellence—The structure to deliver
the lower pyramid transactional issues are described in the
operational excellence section, in which leverage is on self-ser-
vice, efficiency, and scalability. The structure to deliver internal
consulting in the content areas defined here might best be
addressed by centers of excellence related to each content area.
HR Skills Related to Internal Consulting—Explored in more
detail later.
Successful external consultants do some things that are equally
important for internal consultants, which represent the upper pyramid
part of the HR accountabilities. One must show:
Knowledge and understanding of the industry and the
organization;
Quality of ideas;
Ability to solve major business problems;
High quality work;
Ability to develop creative solutions to difficult problems;
Ability to complete projects on time and on budget.
In addition, rapport building is essential. Critical in establishing
credibility is willingness to listen: Demonstrate knowledge and
understanding by the questions asked. One knows intuitively that:
Talking more than you listen is the quickest way to lose your
internal client.
You must acknowledge that the client’s situation is personal and
unique and be willing to listen to their story.
You demonstrate how well you listen by asking appropriate
clarifying questions; you show that you have “done your home-
work” on the issue.
It is helpful to relate similar first-hand experiences with successful
outcomes.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1.
2.
3.
4.
One also needs to understand the client’s frame of reference,
meaning the background, experiences, and personal biases that
influence how he or she thinks about issues. It is important to
develop an understanding of their communications preferences: Do
they prefer detailed factual arguments or one great symbolic story?
Understanding the client’s frame of reference allows one to take the
next step, which is to build empathy. This can be done by:
Paying attention to the emotion around the factual issues.
Reflecting back that you understand how important this is to
them, and that you care also.
Specifically asking “why do you care so deeply about this
issue?”
Finally, to become a good internal consultant one must distin-
guish oneself. Rather than “push an HR agenda,” simply help the
client solve a difficult problem that is important to them. One can:
Provide key information to help solve a problem.
Make him or her look good in front of management and peers.
Bail him or her out of a tight spot.
Leverage resources to demonstrate the willingness to “invest” in
the relationship.
Ultimately, successful internal consultants show predictable
characteristics. They:
Are predisposed to focus on the client, rather than on
themselves.
Focus on the client as an individual, not as a person fulfilling
a role.
Believe that a continued focus on problem definition and resolu-
tion is more important than technical or content mastery.
Show a strong competitive drive aimed not at competitors, but
at constantly finding new ways to be of greater service to the
client.
Are motivated more by an internalized drive to do the right
thing than by their own organization’s rewards and dynamics.
View methodologies, models, techniques, and business processes
as a means to an end; they are useful if they work, and are to be
discarded if they do not; the test is effectiveness here and now,
for this client.
Believe that success in client relationships is tied to the accumu-
lation of quality experiences; as a result, they seek out (rather
than avoid) client-contact experiences, and take personal risks
with clients rather than avoid them.
Believe that both selling and serving are aspects of professional-
ism; both are about proving to clients one’s dedication to helping
them with their issues.
The successful internal consultant is selfless, and gives up his or
her own agenda in service to the needs of their client. The internal
consultant who helps make the client more successful has done his
or her job.
The good news is that a variety of training options exist to
assist with this transformation, varying from contracted exter-
nally delivered training to internal train-the-trainer approaches
that allow an organization to bring the delivery in-house. In addi-
tion, organizations that have long successfully delivered consultant
training to externally focused professional services firms now have
the opportunity to leverage this content to address the internal
consultant development needs for the modern Human Resources
professional.
Overall, we have reason for optimism as our evolution continues.
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
13. Human Resource Planning 30.3 23
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH
Dr. Richard Vosburgh is SVP-HR, Mirage Resorts, for MGM
MIRAGE with responsibility for properties in Las Vegas (Bellagio,
Mirage, New York-New York, Treasure Island, Circus Circus),
Reno (Circus Circus), and Mississippi (Beau Rivage and Gold
Strike), and is planning CityCenter, the largest privately funded
development in the United States, where 12,000 new jobs are
being created. Previously, he was HP’s VP-HR for Asia Pacific
with responsibility for 14 country HR leaders and for HR shared
services across the four business groups from consumer to enter-
prise. Prior to the HP merger and moving to Singapore, Richard
was VP-HR for Compaq’s North America region. In the 25
years since finishing his Ph.D. in industrial/organizational psychol-
ogy, he has held executive positions in Campbell Soup Company,
VW in Germany, the Gallup Organization, and PepsiCo. He has
authored numerous journal articles and one book entitled Career
Development for Engineers and Scientists. Richard is on the board
of the Human Resource Planning Society and is executive editor for
the Human Resource Planning journal.
REFERENCES
Bear DJ (2005). “The Evolving HR Function,” An HRI Highlight Report, St.
Petersburg, FL: The University of Tampa Human Resource Institute.
Bennis WG & Mische M (1995). The 21st Century Organization: Reinventing Through
Reengineering, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
Boudreau JW & Ramstad PM (2006). “Talentship and Human Resource Measurement
and Analysis: From ROI to Strategic Organizational Change,” Human Resource
Planning, 29(1).
Boudreau JW & Ramstad PM (2007). Beyond HR: The New Science of Human
Capital, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.
Bridges W (2003). Managing Transitions: Making the Most of Change, Cambridge,
MA: Perseus Books.
Buckingham M & Vosburgh R (2001). “The 21st Century Human Resources Function:
It’s the Talent, Stupid!” Human Resource Planning, 24(4): 17–23.
Bureau of National Affairs (2004). “HR Department Benchmarks and Analysis 2004,”
BNA.
Burke WW (2002). Organization Change: Theory and Practice, Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications.
CFO Research Services and Mercer Human Resource Consulting (2003). Human
Capital Management: The CFO’s Perspective, Feb. 2003.
Collins J (2001). Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap and Others
Don’t, New York: HarperCollins.
Gratton L (2007). Hot Spots. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Gubman E (2004). “HR Strategy and Planning: From Birth to Business Results,”
Human Resource Planning, 27(1): 13–23.
The Hackett Group (2004). “Secrets to Success: How to Spend Less but Deliver More,”
Best Practices in HR, Aug. 2004, 1–2.
Hammonds K (2005). “Why We Hate HR,” Fast Company, 97 (Aug.): 40.
Jamrog J & Overholt M (2004). “Building a Strategic HR Function,” Human Resource
Planning, 27(1): 51–62.
Kahnweiler WM. (2006). “Sustaining Success in Human Resources: Some Key Career
Self Management Strategies,” Human Resource Planning, 29(1).
Kanter RM (1983). Change Masters, NY, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Kotter JP (1996). Leading Change, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Lawler EE & Boudreau JW (2006). “HR Support for Corporate Boards,” Human
Resource Planning, 29(1).
Lawler EE, Boudreau JW, & Mohrman S (2006). Achieving Strategic Excellence, Palo
Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Lawson E, Mueller-Oerlinghausen J, & Shearn JA (2005). “A Dearth of HR Talent,”
The McKinsey Quarterly, 2: 13–14.
McMann D (2007). Personal correspondence and on www.mcmannransford.com.
Michaels E, Handfield-Jones H, & Axelrod B (2001). The War for Talent, Boston, MA:
Harvard Business School Press.
Peters TJ & Waterman RH (1982). In Search of Excellence, New York, NY:
HarperCollins.
Ramlall SJ & Sheppeck M (2006). “Increasing the Relevance of Graduate HR
Curriculum,” Human Resource Planning, 29(1).
Ryan L (2005). “Why HR Gets No Respect,” Business Week, June 1, 2005.
Schein E (2004). Organizational Culture and Leadership, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-
Bass.
SHRM Global Forum (2004). “The Maturing Profession of Human Resources
Worldwide,” SHRM Research, Jan. 2004.
Stewart T (1996). “Taking on the Last Bureaucracy,” Fortune, Jan. 15.
Ulrich D (1997). Human Resource Champions, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School
Press.
Ulrich D & Brockbank W (2005). The HR Value Proposition, Boston, MA: Harvard
Business School Press.
Vosburgh R (2004). “Introducing the HRPS Knowledge Areas,” Human Resource
Planning, 27(1): 7–10.
Wickham S (1981). “Big Hat, No Cattle: Managing Human Resources,” Harvard
Business Review, Sept.–Oct.