From: Herhausen, Ludwig, Grewal, Wulf, and Schoegel (2019)
Detecting, Preventing, and Mitigating Online
Firestorms in Brand Communities
More than 65 million firms leverage online brand communities
to connect with customers and increase online reputation,
brand patronage, and customer spending. However, online
communities are vulnerable to online firestorms, or negative
electronic Word of Mouth (eWOM), that receives substantial
support from other customers in a short period of time.
From: Herhausen, Ludwig, Grewal, Wulf, and Schoegel (2019)
1. How can firms detect potential online firestorms (“detection”)?
2. How can firms prevent potential online firestorms (“prevention”)?
3. How can firms mitigate evolved online firestorms (“mitigation”)?
time
Impact
User Post as Trigger
of Firestorm
Research Questions
From: Herhausen, Ludwig, Grewal, Wulf, and Schoegel (2019)
Detection: WHAT is being said by WHOM is contagious
The senders’ structural ties, high emotional arousal, and similarity to the online brand
community drive the virality of negative eWOM.
From: Herhausen, Ludwig, Grewal, Wulf, and Schoegel (2019)
Prevention: Responses by firms to recover and regulate
Engaging with empathy and disengaging with an apology or channel change limits the
virality of negative eWOM while providing a compensation further “fuels the fire”.
From: Herhausen, Ludwig, Grewal, Wulf, and Schoegel (2019)
Mitigation: Responses should be tailored
From: Herhausen, Ludwig, Grewal, Wulf, and Schoegel (2019)
Mitigation: Responses should vary over time
Explanation Empathy Compensation

Herhausen et al (2022).pptx

  • 1.
    From: Herhausen, Ludwig,Grewal, Wulf, and Schoegel (2019) Detecting, Preventing, and Mitigating Online Firestorms in Brand Communities More than 65 million firms leverage online brand communities to connect with customers and increase online reputation, brand patronage, and customer spending. However, online communities are vulnerable to online firestorms, or negative electronic Word of Mouth (eWOM), that receives substantial support from other customers in a short period of time.
  • 2.
    From: Herhausen, Ludwig,Grewal, Wulf, and Schoegel (2019) 1. How can firms detect potential online firestorms (“detection”)? 2. How can firms prevent potential online firestorms (“prevention”)? 3. How can firms mitigate evolved online firestorms (“mitigation”)? time Impact User Post as Trigger of Firestorm Research Questions
  • 3.
    From: Herhausen, Ludwig,Grewal, Wulf, and Schoegel (2019) Detection: WHAT is being said by WHOM is contagious The senders’ structural ties, high emotional arousal, and similarity to the online brand community drive the virality of negative eWOM.
  • 4.
    From: Herhausen, Ludwig,Grewal, Wulf, and Schoegel (2019) Prevention: Responses by firms to recover and regulate Engaging with empathy and disengaging with an apology or channel change limits the virality of negative eWOM while providing a compensation further “fuels the fire”.
  • 5.
    From: Herhausen, Ludwig,Grewal, Wulf, and Schoegel (2019) Mitigation: Responses should be tailored
  • 6.
    From: Herhausen, Ludwig,Grewal, Wulf, and Schoegel (2019) Mitigation: Responses should vary over time Explanation Empathy Compensation