Identifying Local 
Olympia Oyster 
Stocks Useful for 
Restoration 
Jake Heare, Joth Davis, Brady Blake, 
Brent Vadopalas, Steven Roberts 
Data, slides, and preprint @ oystergen.es/olympia 
16th International Conference on Shellfish Restoration, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
Outline 
● Background 
o O. lurida history 
o Local stocks? 
● Experiment 
o Broodstock/Outplant 
o Fieldwork 
● Results 
o Mortality 
o Growth 
o Reproduction 
● Conclusion 
o Summary 
o Implications
Outline 
● Background 
● Experiment 
● Results 
● Conclusion
Brief History of Olympia Oysters 
1. Ostrea lurida Native to 
Puget Sound 
2. Culturally & 
Commercially Important 
3. Heavy Declines 
4. Targeted for Restoration 
in Washington
How local should stocks be? 
● Scale 
● Restoration 
Success
Outline 
● Background 
● Experiment 
● Results 
● Conclusion
Experiment Basics 
● Reciprocal Transplant 
● Monitor 
o 3 Groups 
o 4 Sites 
Each group was placed in 
home site and three 
foreign sites. 
Fidalgo Bay 
Dabob Bay 
Manchester 
Oyster Bay
Winter Field Work 
● Collected Dead 
● Counted Live 
● Imaged for Size 
● Maintained Trays
Summer Field Work 
● 15 Weeks 
● Reproduction 
● Number of Brooders 
● Growth 
● Mortality
Expectations 
1. No difference 
2. Home Field 
Advantage 
3. Uber-Oyster 
1. All Groups Equally 
Successful 
2. Groups Only 
Successful at 
Home 
3. One Group 
Outperforms
Outline 
● Background 
● Experiment 
● Results 
● Conclusion
1.0 
0.5 
0 
Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr June 
1.0 
0.5 
0 
Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr June 
Mortality 
Fidalgo 
Manchester
1.0 
0.5 
0 
1.0 
0.5 
0 
Dabob Mortality 
Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr June 
Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr June 
Oyster Bay 
Dabob
Oyster Bay 
Dabob
50 
30 
10 
50 
30 
10 
50 
30 
10 
Growth 
Dabob 
Group 
Fidalgo 
Group 
Oyster Bay 
Group 
Fidalgo 
Manchester 
Oyster Bay 
Dabob 
Dabob 
Fidalgo
Reproduction 15 
Temperature 
10 
5 
0 
May June July Aug 
15 
10 
5 
0 
May June July Aug 
Fidalgo 
Manchester 
Oyster Bay 
Dabob 
Group 
Fidalgo 
Group 
Oyster Bay 
Group 
X 
X 
X
Outline 
● Background 
● Experiment 
● Results 
● Conclusion
Expectations vs. Reality 
1. Equality? 
2. Home Field Advantage? 
3. Uber-Oyster? 
4. ??? 
1. No 
2. No 
3. No
Summary 
● Mortality 
o Dabob Survives Better 
● Growth 
o Dabob Smallest 
● Reproduction 
o Oyster Bay Most Active (early & more)
Conclusions 
Oysters from home site with harsh conditions – 
temperature, food, habitat -- survive better 
(Dabob Bay). 
Oysters from home site with lush conditions – 
temperature, food, habitat -- are more 
reproductively active* (Oyster Bay).
* Number of brooders and spawning period 
does not equal reproductive success.
How local should stocks be? 
● Scale 
● Restoration 
Success 
In Puget Sound we found 
differences in Olympia oyster 
performance, 
related to population of origin 
habitat conditions.
Acknowledgements 
Aquaculture Program
Acknowledgements 
Roberts Lab: 
● Sam White 
● Claire Olson 
● Mackenzie Gavery 
● Emma Timmins- 
Schiffman 
● Grace Crandall 
● Jonathon Allen 
● Etilet Maipi 
● Samantha Adams 
● Hannah Wear 
● Jessica Richards 
● Katie Jackson 
● Andy Jasonowicz 
● Doug Immerman 
● Giles Goetz 
PSRF: 
● Ryan Crim 
● Brian Allen 
● Betsy Peabody 
● Stuart Ryan 
Crab Fresh: 
● Brendan Mahaffey 
● Jeff Koenings 
● Rick Tweed 
● Hatchery Crew 
Fidalgo Marina: 
● Einar Sortun 
● Yacht Owners 
Taylor Shellfish: 
● Molly Jackson 
● Sara Wykoff 
● Ed Jones 
NOAA: 
● Rick Goetz 
● Dive Team 
● Netpen Crew 
Fagergren Family 
Rockpoint Oyster 
Company: 
● Dick Steele 
● Crew 
Miscellaneous: 
● L. Christine 
Savolainen 
● Sean Bennet 
● Joelle Blais 
● Joe Stevick 
● Bethany Stevick 
● Lisa Crosson 
● Alicia Godersky 
● Lea Savolainen 
Photo Credits: 
● Jake Heare 
● L. Christine 
Savolainen 
● Steven Roberts 
● Sam Adams
Follow Jake’s Research! 
Lab Notebook: 
heareresearch.blogspot.com 
Twitter: 
@HeareBraindIdea 
Roberts Lab: 
faculty.washington.edu/sr320 
Facebook: 
facebook.com/pages/Roberts-Lab 
Data, slides, and preprint @ oystergen.es/olympia
Temperature and Reproduction 
Oyster Bay Site 
Mar Apr May June July Aug 
750 
500 
250 
0 
AVG Fidalgo/Dabob Peak Spawn 483.01 DD 
AVG Oyster Bay Peak Spawn 331.025 DD 
Fidalgo 
Site 
151.985

Identifying Local Olympia Oyster Stocks Useful for Restoration

  • 1.
    Identifying Local OlympiaOyster Stocks Useful for Restoration Jake Heare, Joth Davis, Brady Blake, Brent Vadopalas, Steven Roberts Data, slides, and preprint @ oystergen.es/olympia 16th International Conference on Shellfish Restoration, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
  • 2.
    Outline ● Background o O. lurida history o Local stocks? ● Experiment o Broodstock/Outplant o Fieldwork ● Results o Mortality o Growth o Reproduction ● Conclusion o Summary o Implications
  • 3.
    Outline ● Background ● Experiment ● Results ● Conclusion
  • 4.
    Brief History ofOlympia Oysters 1. Ostrea lurida Native to Puget Sound 2. Culturally & Commercially Important 3. Heavy Declines 4. Targeted for Restoration in Washington
  • 5.
    How local shouldstocks be? ● Scale ● Restoration Success
  • 6.
    Outline ● Background ● Experiment ● Results ● Conclusion
  • 7.
    Experiment Basics ●Reciprocal Transplant ● Monitor o 3 Groups o 4 Sites Each group was placed in home site and three foreign sites. Fidalgo Bay Dabob Bay Manchester Oyster Bay
  • 8.
    Winter Field Work ● Collected Dead ● Counted Live ● Imaged for Size ● Maintained Trays
  • 9.
    Summer Field Work ● 15 Weeks ● Reproduction ● Number of Brooders ● Growth ● Mortality
  • 10.
    Expectations 1. Nodifference 2. Home Field Advantage 3. Uber-Oyster 1. All Groups Equally Successful 2. Groups Only Successful at Home 3. One Group Outperforms
  • 11.
    Outline ● Background ● Experiment ● Results ● Conclusion
  • 12.
    1.0 0.5 0 Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr June 1.0 0.5 0 Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr June Mortality Fidalgo Manchester
  • 13.
    1.0 0.5 0 1.0 0.5 0 Dabob Mortality Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr June Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr June Oyster Bay Dabob
  • 14.
  • 15.
    50 30 10 50 30 10 50 30 10 Growth Dabob Group Fidalgo Group Oyster Bay Group Fidalgo Manchester Oyster Bay Dabob Dabob Fidalgo
  • 16.
    Reproduction 15 Temperature 10 5 0 May June July Aug 15 10 5 0 May June July Aug Fidalgo Manchester Oyster Bay Dabob Group Fidalgo Group Oyster Bay Group X X X
  • 17.
    Outline ● Background ● Experiment ● Results ● Conclusion
  • 18.
    Expectations vs. Reality 1. Equality? 2. Home Field Advantage? 3. Uber-Oyster? 4. ??? 1. No 2. No 3. No
  • 19.
    Summary ● Mortality o Dabob Survives Better ● Growth o Dabob Smallest ● Reproduction o Oyster Bay Most Active (early & more)
  • 20.
    Conclusions Oysters fromhome site with harsh conditions – temperature, food, habitat -- survive better (Dabob Bay). Oysters from home site with lush conditions – temperature, food, habitat -- are more reproductively active* (Oyster Bay).
  • 21.
    * Number ofbrooders and spawning period does not equal reproductive success.
  • 22.
    How local shouldstocks be? ● Scale ● Restoration Success In Puget Sound we found differences in Olympia oyster performance, related to population of origin habitat conditions.
  • 23.
  • 24.
    Acknowledgements Roberts Lab: ● Sam White ● Claire Olson ● Mackenzie Gavery ● Emma Timmins- Schiffman ● Grace Crandall ● Jonathon Allen ● Etilet Maipi ● Samantha Adams ● Hannah Wear ● Jessica Richards ● Katie Jackson ● Andy Jasonowicz ● Doug Immerman ● Giles Goetz PSRF: ● Ryan Crim ● Brian Allen ● Betsy Peabody ● Stuart Ryan Crab Fresh: ● Brendan Mahaffey ● Jeff Koenings ● Rick Tweed ● Hatchery Crew Fidalgo Marina: ● Einar Sortun ● Yacht Owners Taylor Shellfish: ● Molly Jackson ● Sara Wykoff ● Ed Jones NOAA: ● Rick Goetz ● Dive Team ● Netpen Crew Fagergren Family Rockpoint Oyster Company: ● Dick Steele ● Crew Miscellaneous: ● L. Christine Savolainen ● Sean Bennet ● Joelle Blais ● Joe Stevick ● Bethany Stevick ● Lisa Crosson ● Alicia Godersky ● Lea Savolainen Photo Credits: ● Jake Heare ● L. Christine Savolainen ● Steven Roberts ● Sam Adams
  • 25.
    Follow Jake’s Research! Lab Notebook: heareresearch.blogspot.com Twitter: @HeareBraindIdea Roberts Lab: faculty.washington.edu/sr320 Facebook: facebook.com/pages/Roberts-Lab Data, slides, and preprint @ oystergen.es/olympia
  • 27.
    Temperature and Reproduction Oyster Bay Site Mar Apr May June July Aug 750 500 250 0 AVG Fidalgo/Dabob Peak Spawn 483.01 DD AVG Oyster Bay Peak Spawn 331.025 DD Fidalgo Site 151.985

Editor's Notes

  • #13 Make into two slides
  • #14 Make into two slides
  • #15 Make into two slides
  • #28 Cushing’s Match-Mismatch Hypothesis