The Supreme Court summarized the key issue in interpreting Section 6(7) of the Press Council Act regarding the number of terms a member can be nominated. The Single Judge held the language was plain in allowing nomination for more than two terms, not just renomination for a second term. However, the Division Bench overruled this, finding legislative intent was to limit membership to two terms total. The Supreme Court restored the Single Judge's decision, finding no evidence to depart from the ordinary meaning of the words used in Section 6(7).