Guj hc june 23 order
•
0 likes•220 views
1. The document is a court order from the High Court of Gujarat granting bail to 33 applicants who were arrested and charged with various offenses related to a protest. 2. The applicants were migrant workers from Jharkhand and West Bengal working in Ahmedabad who, due to the lockdown, were without work, money, or food and wanted to return home. 3. Considering the circumstances of the lockdown and that the applicants seemed to be victims rather than criminals, the court exercised its powers to release the applicants on regular bail against a personal bond of 500 rupees each.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
Shahpur stone pelting bail order june 26
The document is a court order from the High Court of Gujarat regarding applications for regular bail filed by three individuals in connection with an FIR registered for various offenses. The court heard arguments from both sides. It observed that no specific role was attributed to the applicants in the FIR. Further, no police personnel were seriously injured. Considering these facts, the court exercised its discretion and granted the applicants regular bail on executing personal bonds of Rs. 15,000 each with one surety of the same amount, along with various conditions for bail.
Henry tiphagne v state
The petitioner filed a criminal original petition to quash an FIR registered against him for conducting a peaceful protest against the CAA and NRC amendments. While the court acknowledged that there were grounds to register the FIR for public nuisance and traffic interference, it ruled that continuing the prosecution was not warranted since no violence or untoward incidents occurred. Noting that peaceful protests had been seen across India against the amendments, the court quashed the FIR and allowed the petition, with the benefit also applying to other non-petitioning accused in the case.
Saathik ali v state
The petitioner filed a criminal original petition in the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court to quash an FIR registered against him and others for conducting a peaceful demonstration against the CAA and NRC amendments. While there was prima facie evidence for an FIR, the court noted that no untoward incidents occurred during the peaceful protest. Since continued prosecution was not warranted given the lack of violence, the court quashed the FIR to secure the ends of justice, with the benefit also applying to the non-petitioning accused mentioned in the FIR.
Patna hc illegal migrants order aug 18
1) The Patna High Court reviewed an affidavit from the Bihar government about establishing detention centers for illegal foreign nationals outside of jail premises.
2) The affidavit stated that the government has approved a proposal to set up a temporary detention center at the Bihar Institute of Correctional Administration in Hajipur.
3) However, the court found the affidavit vague about the timeline for establishing detention centers and ensuring the temporary center has adequate infrastructure. It directed the government to file a fresh affidavit providing more details.
Gauhati hc sep 9 order
The document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Asor Uddin challenging a ex-parte order from the Foreigners' Tribunal declaring him to be a foreigner. The High Court allowed the petition, set aside the ex-parte order, and remanded the matter back to the Foreigners' Tribunal for fresh proceedings. However, the petitioner was ordered to remain on bail, appear before the Superintendent of Police, and the Foreigners' Tribunal by certain dates or the ex-parte order would be revived.
Vinod dua judgment
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India case regarding a writ petition filed by Vinod Dua against the registration of an FIR against him. The FIR was filed pursuant to a complaint alleging that statements made by Dua in a YouTube talk show on March 30th spread false information and violated sections of the Indian Penal Code. In the writ petition, Dua argues that the contents of the video were critical analysis of the government and not unlawful. He seeks quashing of the FIR and guidelines for registering FIRs against members of the media with over 10 years of experience. The state's affidavit in reply refers to sections of the Disaster Management Act regarding punishment for false claims or warnings leading to panic during a pandemic.
Gauhati hc
1) The petitioner had been declared a foreigner by a Foreigners Tribunal in Jorhat and has been in detention since May 2019, nearing completion of two years in detention.
2) In light of Supreme Court orders on releasing detainees who have completed two years to avoid COVID spread, the court directs the petitioner's release on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 5,000 and one surety of the same amount.
3) The court reiterates an earlier order directing authorities to release all detainees who have completed two years, on a personal bond and one surety to address the pandemic, while complying with other directions.
Appointment reciept
The document is an online appointment receipt from the Ministry of External Affairs in India for passport renewal. It provides details of the applicant such as name, date of birth, address, appointment details including date and time, and instructions for attending the appointment. The appointment is scheduled for August 31st, 2017 at 10:30 AM at the Passport Seva Kendra in Chandigarh. The applicant is asked to arrive by 10:15 AM and bring relevant documents and previous passport.
Recommended
Shahpur stone pelting bail order june 26
The document is a court order from the High Court of Gujarat regarding applications for regular bail filed by three individuals in connection with an FIR registered for various offenses. The court heard arguments from both sides. It observed that no specific role was attributed to the applicants in the FIR. Further, no police personnel were seriously injured. Considering these facts, the court exercised its discretion and granted the applicants regular bail on executing personal bonds of Rs. 15,000 each with one surety of the same amount, along with various conditions for bail.
Henry tiphagne v state
The petitioner filed a criminal original petition to quash an FIR registered against him for conducting a peaceful protest against the CAA and NRC amendments. While the court acknowledged that there were grounds to register the FIR for public nuisance and traffic interference, it ruled that continuing the prosecution was not warranted since no violence or untoward incidents occurred. Noting that peaceful protests had been seen across India against the amendments, the court quashed the FIR and allowed the petition, with the benefit also applying to other non-petitioning accused in the case.
Saathik ali v state
The petitioner filed a criminal original petition in the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court to quash an FIR registered against him and others for conducting a peaceful demonstration against the CAA and NRC amendments. While there was prima facie evidence for an FIR, the court noted that no untoward incidents occurred during the peaceful protest. Since continued prosecution was not warranted given the lack of violence, the court quashed the FIR to secure the ends of justice, with the benefit also applying to the non-petitioning accused mentioned in the FIR.
Patna hc illegal migrants order aug 18
1) The Patna High Court reviewed an affidavit from the Bihar government about establishing detention centers for illegal foreign nationals outside of jail premises.
2) The affidavit stated that the government has approved a proposal to set up a temporary detention center at the Bihar Institute of Correctional Administration in Hajipur.
3) However, the court found the affidavit vague about the timeline for establishing detention centers and ensuring the temporary center has adequate infrastructure. It directed the government to file a fresh affidavit providing more details.
Gauhati hc sep 9 order
The document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Asor Uddin challenging a ex-parte order from the Foreigners' Tribunal declaring him to be a foreigner. The High Court allowed the petition, set aside the ex-parte order, and remanded the matter back to the Foreigners' Tribunal for fresh proceedings. However, the petitioner was ordered to remain on bail, appear before the Superintendent of Police, and the Foreigners' Tribunal by certain dates or the ex-parte order would be revived.
Vinod dua judgment
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India case regarding a writ petition filed by Vinod Dua against the registration of an FIR against him. The FIR was filed pursuant to a complaint alleging that statements made by Dua in a YouTube talk show on March 30th spread false information and violated sections of the Indian Penal Code. In the writ petition, Dua argues that the contents of the video were critical analysis of the government and not unlawful. He seeks quashing of the FIR and guidelines for registering FIRs against members of the media with over 10 years of experience. The state's affidavit in reply refers to sections of the Disaster Management Act regarding punishment for false claims or warnings leading to panic during a pandemic.
Gauhati hc
1) The petitioner had been declared a foreigner by a Foreigners Tribunal in Jorhat and has been in detention since May 2019, nearing completion of two years in detention.
2) In light of Supreme Court orders on releasing detainees who have completed two years to avoid COVID spread, the court directs the petitioner's release on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 5,000 and one surety of the same amount.
3) The court reiterates an earlier order directing authorities to release all detainees who have completed two years, on a personal bond and one surety to address the pandemic, while complying with other directions.
Appointment reciept
The document is an online appointment receipt from the Ministry of External Affairs in India for passport renewal. It provides details of the applicant such as name, date of birth, address, appointment details including date and time, and instructions for attending the appointment. The appointment is scheduled for August 31st, 2017 at 10:30 AM at the Passport Seva Kendra in Chandigarh. The applicant is asked to arrive by 10:15 AM and bring relevant documents and previous passport.
8284 of 2019 gauhati hc
This document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a petition filed by Rahima Khatun challenging an ex-parte order from the Foreigners Tribunal declaring her an illegal migrant. The High Court remanded the matter back to the Foreigners Tribunal for reconsideration of Rahima Khatun's citizenship status, after hearing from her. It also directed Rahima Khatun to appear before the Superintendent of Police within 15 days to provide information and furnish a bail bond, and not leave the district without permission. The records were then remitted back to the Foreigners Tribunal for further proceedings.
15656 of 2020
The document summarizes a court case regarding a complaint filed against individuals who depicted the Indian national flag on a cake at a Christmas celebration event.
1) The complainant felt depicting the flag on a cake that was later cut and consumed amounted to insulting the national flag, which is an offense under Indian law. However, police initially refused to file an FIR.
2) The complainant then filed a petition with a judicial magistrate seeking an order directing police to file an FIR. The magistrate took cognizance of the complaint but then improperly reverted to using powers under a different section of criminal law to direct police to investigate.
3) The court hearing the challenge to the magistrate's order found that once cogniz
Gauhati hc order july 20
1) The petitioner challenged a Foreigners Tribunal order declaring her a foreigner.
2) The Court remanded the case back to the Foreigners Tribunal for reconsideration, noting communication issues with the petitioner's counsel resulted in her missing hearings.
3) The Court will allow the petitioner to appear before the Tribunal again to prove her citizenship, as this is an important right that should be decided on the merits rather than by default.
4) The impugned Foreigners Tribunal order declaring the petitioner a foreigner is set aside, and she must appear before the Tribunal within one month to prove she is an Indian citizen.
Madras hc cbi judgment
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to transfer the investigation of a case involving the collection of around Rs. 300 crores in deposits by a company to the CBI. The court noted that the case is currently being investigated by the Economic Offences Wing and that the investigation is progressing well with movable properties seized and 19 immovable properties identified based on confession statements. While there is usually a demand for CBI investigation, transferring the case now would adversely affect the ongoing investigation. The court thus denied the petitioner's request and hopes the Economic Offences Wing will attach properties and file a charge sheet swiftly.
K'taka HC on Marital Rape.pdf
The document summarizes four writ petitions filed in the High Court of Karnataka regarding charges of rape against a husband.
1. The petitions challenge the constitutionality of sections 29 and 30 of the POCSO Act, which place the burden of proof on the accused, as violating Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Indian constitution.
2. One petition was filed by the accused husband seeking to quash the criminal proceedings against him for offenses including rape of his wife under section 376 of the IPC.
3. The lawyers for the accused argued that the presumptions under the POCSO Act are unconstitutional and that the original FIR did not mention offenses under section 376 of the IPC.
4
Bom hc nagpur july 29 order
The applicant challenged two orders - one extending his detention for 90 days under the UAPA and the other rejecting his application for default bail. The court analyzed whether the requirements for seeking extension of detention under the UAPA were satisfied. It found that the public prosecutor had submitted a detailed report outlining the progress of the investigation and reasons for seeking an extension. It also found that a joint application for the applicant and another accused was justified as the allegations against them were identical. Therefore, the mandatory requirements for extending detention under the UAPA were satisfied and the applicant was not entitled to default bail.
Gauhati hc judgement july 15
The petitioner challenged an opinion by a Foreigners Tribunal that held she was a foreigner who entered India illegally after March 24, 1971. The High Court set aside the opinion and remanded the matter back to the Tribunal. The Court found that the Tribunal exceeded the scope of the reference made to it by the police, which was to determine if the petitioner entered between January 1, 1966 and March 25, 1971. The Tribunal instead ruled she entered after March 25, 1971. The High Court held this was impermissible and sent the matter back for the Tribunal to rule on the actual terms of the reference.
Second Appeal dated 06 04 2017 against SC before CIC New Delhi
Second Appeal vide D.NO. 122864 dated 06.04.2017 before CIC New Delhi against Registrar Supreme Court of India for refusal of Registration of Writ (Criminal) D.NO.2188 of 2017 entitled "OM PRAKASH & ANR VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS"
Order dated 08.10.2020
This document summarizes a court case in India. It discusses an application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to quash criminal proceedings arising from a case involving charges of kidnapping and rape. The court notes that the accused and victim have now married and reconciled their dispute through a compromise. Referring to previous court rulings, the judge determines that compromise can be allowed even in some serious criminal cases. Given the reconciliation between the parties, the court quashes the criminal proceedings and earlier court order, allowing the case to be closed.
Reply by First Appellate Authority CIC New Delhi against Non-Implementation o...
Reply by First Appellate Authority CIC New Delhi against Non-Implementation of Section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005 dated 30 January 2017
анкета
This document is an online visa application submitted by Aleksandra Vorobeva, a Russian citizen, on May 21, 2014. She is applying for a family visitor visa to the UK to visit from July 18-August 9, 2014. The application provides her biographic and passport details, contact information, travel history, employment, and family details. It includes payment confirmation for the visa application fee and declares that the information provided is true.
RTI dated 22-03-2020 against Supreme Court of India
Opposite Parties in M.A. 583/2020 in W.P.(Criminal) are CORRUPT JUDGES, ADVOCATES and POLICE.
Biased Mentioning Officer of Supreme Court of India allowing Civil matters for listing during COVID 19 and Criminal matters are NOT CONSIDERED as URGENT MATTER
Application for Urgent Hearing of Appeal before Supreme Court of India vide D...
Application for Urgent Hearing of Appeal by way of motion against the Lodgment Order dated 16.02.2017 in W.P.(Crl.)D.No.3913 of 2017 issued by the Registrar, Supreme Court of India under Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 along with Affidavit and Annexures P-1 to P-5 filed before Supreme Court of India vide D.NO. 45930 dated 05.06.2017
First appeal against CIC New Delhi dated 24.01.2017 for Non- Implementation ...
First appeal against CIC New Delhi dated 24.01.2017 for Non- Implementation of Section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005
Interlocutory Application 01 of 2019 before Patna High Court
Against violation of High Court Rules by the Registry & Organised mob lynching and illegal detention of petitioner by the nexus of State and Mafia.
Madras hc bail caa mar 25 order
The petitioner, Jafar Sathick, filed a criminal original petition to quash the FIR registered against him in Crime No. 63 of 2020 by the Boothapandy Police Station. The FIR alleged that the petitioner organized a protest against amendments to the Citizenship Laws that caused public nuisance and hindered traffic. However, the court noted that the protest was peaceful with no untoward incidents. Since the investigation was almost complete, the court quashed the FIR against the petitioner while emphasizing the constitutional right to peaceful protest without arms.
Guj hc sedition bail aug 3
The document is an order from a High Court in India regarding an application for bail. It summarizes the following:
1) The applicant, Babita Sukar Kashyap, is seeking bail in connection with an FIR registered against her for offenses related to sedition, conspiracy, and causing enmity between groups.
2) She is alleged to have instigated followers of a tribal group in Gujarat to take violent action based on her interpretation of constitutional provisions. However, the prosecution has not clearly established her specific role or any actual violence.
3) The court observed that the applicant has been in custody for over a year, the key evidence is collected, and the prosecution has not shown any risk
Sc judgement 02-aug-2021
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India judgment regarding a preventive detention order passed against a man under the Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act. The detention order was based on 5 FIRs filed against the man for cheating by collecting over 50 lakhs rupees from victims by promising high returns through stock market investments. The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the detention order. The Supreme Court is hearing an appeal of that dismissal.
Gujrat HC on custodial torture.pdf
1. The court ordered an inquiry into the arrest of four petitioners by police authorities in Gujarat, as the court believes this was a case of extreme excess and the petitioners appear to be victims due to their birth in a particular community.
2. While independent witnesses said the petitioners earned an honest living, police implicated them in around 5 cases based only on their confessions obtained through torture. The petitioners were acquitted in all cases by trial courts.
3. The court ordered the Inspector General of Police to conduct an inquiry and submit an affidavit regarding any excess committed by police in arresting and implicating the petitioners. The court will then decide on action against police officers and compensation for the petition
Allahabad hc order ashish kumar bail
The applicant, Ashish Kumar, applied for bail in a case under Section 124-A IPC regarding criminal charges. He had previously been granted bail for other offenses related to the same incident. The prosecution opposed bail, arguing he may interfere with evidence or commit other crimes. Considering Article 21 of the Indian Constitution regarding personal liberty, the court granted bail with conditions, including that the applicant not tamper with evidence, cooperate with trial, and avoid further criminal acts or the bail will be cancelled.
Madras hc jan 21 order
1) The petitioner, M. Ananthan, was arrested in 2018 for drug offenses involving commercial quantities of ganja and has been in judicial custody since.
2) While the petitioner satisfies one requirement for bail under the NDPS Act by not having a criminal record, the court found he did not satisfy the second requirement that he is not likely to have committed the offense based on evidence.
3) However, the court determined the petitioner's right to a speedy trial had been violated as the trial had not commenced for over two years. As such, the court directed the prosecution to pay compensation of Rs. 1 lakh and for the trial to conclude within three months.
Yatin oza contempt guj hc 09062020
1) The court initiated suo moto contempt proceedings against Yatin Oza, President of the Gujarat High Court Advocates' Association, for making serious allegations of corruption against the High Court registry in a press conference during the COVID-19 pandemic.
2) In the press conference, Oza levelled accusations of corrupt practices, undue favors to influential people, and forum shopping in the High Court without providing valid evidence.
3) The court observed that Oza's statements scandalized and lowered the authority of the High Court during a time when both the bench and bar should be working together constructively to address the pandemic crisis.
More Related Content
What's hot
8284 of 2019 gauhati hc
This document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a petition filed by Rahima Khatun challenging an ex-parte order from the Foreigners Tribunal declaring her an illegal migrant. The High Court remanded the matter back to the Foreigners Tribunal for reconsideration of Rahima Khatun's citizenship status, after hearing from her. It also directed Rahima Khatun to appear before the Superintendent of Police within 15 days to provide information and furnish a bail bond, and not leave the district without permission. The records were then remitted back to the Foreigners Tribunal for further proceedings.
15656 of 2020
The document summarizes a court case regarding a complaint filed against individuals who depicted the Indian national flag on a cake at a Christmas celebration event.
1) The complainant felt depicting the flag on a cake that was later cut and consumed amounted to insulting the national flag, which is an offense under Indian law. However, police initially refused to file an FIR.
2) The complainant then filed a petition with a judicial magistrate seeking an order directing police to file an FIR. The magistrate took cognizance of the complaint but then improperly reverted to using powers under a different section of criminal law to direct police to investigate.
3) The court hearing the challenge to the magistrate's order found that once cogniz
Gauhati hc order july 20
1) The petitioner challenged a Foreigners Tribunal order declaring her a foreigner.
2) The Court remanded the case back to the Foreigners Tribunal for reconsideration, noting communication issues with the petitioner's counsel resulted in her missing hearings.
3) The Court will allow the petitioner to appear before the Tribunal again to prove her citizenship, as this is an important right that should be decided on the merits rather than by default.
4) The impugned Foreigners Tribunal order declaring the petitioner a foreigner is set aside, and she must appear before the Tribunal within one month to prove she is an Indian citizen.
Madras hc cbi judgment
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to transfer the investigation of a case involving the collection of around Rs. 300 crores in deposits by a company to the CBI. The court noted that the case is currently being investigated by the Economic Offences Wing and that the investigation is progressing well with movable properties seized and 19 immovable properties identified based on confession statements. While there is usually a demand for CBI investigation, transferring the case now would adversely affect the ongoing investigation. The court thus denied the petitioner's request and hopes the Economic Offences Wing will attach properties and file a charge sheet swiftly.
K'taka HC on Marital Rape.pdf
The document summarizes four writ petitions filed in the High Court of Karnataka regarding charges of rape against a husband.
1. The petitions challenge the constitutionality of sections 29 and 30 of the POCSO Act, which place the burden of proof on the accused, as violating Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Indian constitution.
2. One petition was filed by the accused husband seeking to quash the criminal proceedings against him for offenses including rape of his wife under section 376 of the IPC.
3. The lawyers for the accused argued that the presumptions under the POCSO Act are unconstitutional and that the original FIR did not mention offenses under section 376 of the IPC.
4
Bom hc nagpur july 29 order
The applicant challenged two orders - one extending his detention for 90 days under the UAPA and the other rejecting his application for default bail. The court analyzed whether the requirements for seeking extension of detention under the UAPA were satisfied. It found that the public prosecutor had submitted a detailed report outlining the progress of the investigation and reasons for seeking an extension. It also found that a joint application for the applicant and another accused was justified as the allegations against them were identical. Therefore, the mandatory requirements for extending detention under the UAPA were satisfied and the applicant was not entitled to default bail.
Gauhati hc judgement july 15
The petitioner challenged an opinion by a Foreigners Tribunal that held she was a foreigner who entered India illegally after March 24, 1971. The High Court set aside the opinion and remanded the matter back to the Tribunal. The Court found that the Tribunal exceeded the scope of the reference made to it by the police, which was to determine if the petitioner entered between January 1, 1966 and March 25, 1971. The Tribunal instead ruled she entered after March 25, 1971. The High Court held this was impermissible and sent the matter back for the Tribunal to rule on the actual terms of the reference.
Second Appeal dated 06 04 2017 against SC before CIC New Delhi
Second Appeal vide D.NO. 122864 dated 06.04.2017 before CIC New Delhi against Registrar Supreme Court of India for refusal of Registration of Writ (Criminal) D.NO.2188 of 2017 entitled "OM PRAKASH & ANR VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS"
Order dated 08.10.2020
This document summarizes a court case in India. It discusses an application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to quash criminal proceedings arising from a case involving charges of kidnapping and rape. The court notes that the accused and victim have now married and reconciled their dispute through a compromise. Referring to previous court rulings, the judge determines that compromise can be allowed even in some serious criminal cases. Given the reconciliation between the parties, the court quashes the criminal proceedings and earlier court order, allowing the case to be closed.
Reply by First Appellate Authority CIC New Delhi against Non-Implementation o...
Reply by First Appellate Authority CIC New Delhi against Non-Implementation of Section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005 dated 30 January 2017
анкета
This document is an online visa application submitted by Aleksandra Vorobeva, a Russian citizen, on May 21, 2014. She is applying for a family visitor visa to the UK to visit from July 18-August 9, 2014. The application provides her biographic and passport details, contact information, travel history, employment, and family details. It includes payment confirmation for the visa application fee and declares that the information provided is true.
RTI dated 22-03-2020 against Supreme Court of India
Opposite Parties in M.A. 583/2020 in W.P.(Criminal) are CORRUPT JUDGES, ADVOCATES and POLICE.
Biased Mentioning Officer of Supreme Court of India allowing Civil matters for listing during COVID 19 and Criminal matters are NOT CONSIDERED as URGENT MATTER
Application for Urgent Hearing of Appeal before Supreme Court of India vide D...
Application for Urgent Hearing of Appeal by way of motion against the Lodgment Order dated 16.02.2017 in W.P.(Crl.)D.No.3913 of 2017 issued by the Registrar, Supreme Court of India under Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 along with Affidavit and Annexures P-1 to P-5 filed before Supreme Court of India vide D.NO. 45930 dated 05.06.2017
First appeal against CIC New Delhi dated 24.01.2017 for Non- Implementation ...
First appeal against CIC New Delhi dated 24.01.2017 for Non- Implementation of Section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005
Interlocutory Application 01 of 2019 before Patna High Court
Against violation of High Court Rules by the Registry & Organised mob lynching and illegal detention of petitioner by the nexus of State and Mafia.
Madras hc bail caa mar 25 order
The petitioner, Jafar Sathick, filed a criminal original petition to quash the FIR registered against him in Crime No. 63 of 2020 by the Boothapandy Police Station. The FIR alleged that the petitioner organized a protest against amendments to the Citizenship Laws that caused public nuisance and hindered traffic. However, the court noted that the protest was peaceful with no untoward incidents. Since the investigation was almost complete, the court quashed the FIR against the petitioner while emphasizing the constitutional right to peaceful protest without arms.
Guj hc sedition bail aug 3
The document is an order from a High Court in India regarding an application for bail. It summarizes the following:
1) The applicant, Babita Sukar Kashyap, is seeking bail in connection with an FIR registered against her for offenses related to sedition, conspiracy, and causing enmity between groups.
2) She is alleged to have instigated followers of a tribal group in Gujarat to take violent action based on her interpretation of constitutional provisions. However, the prosecution has not clearly established her specific role or any actual violence.
3) The court observed that the applicant has been in custody for over a year, the key evidence is collected, and the prosecution has not shown any risk
Sc judgement 02-aug-2021
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India judgment regarding a preventive detention order passed against a man under the Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act. The detention order was based on 5 FIRs filed against the man for cheating by collecting over 50 lakhs rupees from victims by promising high returns through stock market investments. The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the detention order. The Supreme Court is hearing an appeal of that dismissal.
Gujrat HC on custodial torture.pdf
1. The court ordered an inquiry into the arrest of four petitioners by police authorities in Gujarat, as the court believes this was a case of extreme excess and the petitioners appear to be victims due to their birth in a particular community.
2. While independent witnesses said the petitioners earned an honest living, police implicated them in around 5 cases based only on their confessions obtained through torture. The petitioners were acquitted in all cases by trial courts.
3. The court ordered the Inspector General of Police to conduct an inquiry and submit an affidavit regarding any excess committed by police in arresting and implicating the petitioners. The court will then decide on action against police officers and compensation for the petition
Allahabad hc order ashish kumar bail
The applicant, Ashish Kumar, applied for bail in a case under Section 124-A IPC regarding criminal charges. He had previously been granted bail for other offenses related to the same incident. The prosecution opposed bail, arguing he may interfere with evidence or commit other crimes. Considering Article 21 of the Indian Constitution regarding personal liberty, the court granted bail with conditions, including that the applicant not tamper with evidence, cooperate with trial, and avoid further criminal acts or the bail will be cancelled.
What's hot (20)
Second Appeal dated 06 04 2017 against SC before CIC New Delhi
Second Appeal dated 06 04 2017 against SC before CIC New Delhi
Reply by First Appellate Authority CIC New Delhi against Non-Implementation o...
Reply by First Appellate Authority CIC New Delhi against Non-Implementation o...
RTI dated 22-03-2020 against Supreme Court of India
RTI dated 22-03-2020 against Supreme Court of India
Application for Urgent Hearing of Appeal before Supreme Court of India vide D...
Application for Urgent Hearing of Appeal before Supreme Court of India vide D...
First appeal against CIC New Delhi dated 24.01.2017 for Non- Implementation ...
First appeal against CIC New Delhi dated 24.01.2017 for Non- Implementation ...
Interlocutory Application 01 of 2019 before Patna High Court
Interlocutory Application 01 of 2019 before Patna High Court
Similar to Guj hc june 23 order
Madras hc jan 21 order
1) The petitioner, M. Ananthan, was arrested in 2018 for drug offenses involving commercial quantities of ganja and has been in judicial custody since.
2) While the petitioner satisfies one requirement for bail under the NDPS Act by not having a criminal record, the court found he did not satisfy the second requirement that he is not likely to have committed the offense based on evidence.
3) However, the court determined the petitioner's right to a speedy trial had been violated as the trial had not commenced for over two years. As such, the court directed the prosecution to pay compensation of Rs. 1 lakh and for the trial to conclude within three months.
Yatin oza contempt guj hc 09062020
1) The court initiated suo moto contempt proceedings against Yatin Oza, President of the Gujarat High Court Advocates' Association, for making serious allegations of corruption against the High Court registry in a press conference during the COVID-19 pandemic.
2) In the press conference, Oza levelled accusations of corrupt practices, undue favors to influential people, and forum shopping in the High Court without providing valid evidence.
3) The court observed that Oza's statements scandalized and lowered the authority of the High Court during a time when both the bench and bar should be working together constructively to address the pandemic crisis.
Sample criminal proceedings
The petitioner Pushpalatha S filed a petition against respondent Guruswamy S under Section 125(1) of CrPC seeking maintenance. The petitioner and respondent got married on 12-08-2010 in a mass marriage ceremony registered in the Sub-Registrar office of Chamarajanagar. However, the respondent left the petitioner and started living separately without reasonable cause after 2 months of marriage. The petitioner has no independent source of income and is unable to maintain herself. Hence, the petitioner requested that the respondent be directed to pay monthly maintenance of Rs. 5000 for her livelihood.
Court formats
This include some important formats applicable in Indian courts and is very essential for Law Students.
These formats may even be translated to the local (scheduled) indian languages and may be used in the respective courts.
1659618854169994572022-430018.pdf
The court document discusses suspending the sentence of the appellant Babu Lal, who had been sentenced to 10 years imprisonment for offenses under the POCSO Act and IPC against his daughter. While the appellant has served over 7 years of his sentence, his appeal case was not likely to be heard soon. The court decides to suspend the appellant's remaining sentence subject to several conditions to prevent contact with his wife and daughter.
Jnk hc bail ndps
The petitioner Suraj Kumar was arrested for possession of 500 grams of charas and charged with offenses under the NDPS Act. His bail application to the trial court was rejected. In this petition, the High Court considers whether to grant bail. [The High Court grants bail to the petitioner, finding that the quantity was intermediate and not commercial, so the rigors of section 37 do not apply. It also finds that further incarceration would be punitive without conviction. The petitioner is granted bail on furnishing a bond and with conditions of appearing for hearings, not leaving the jurisdiction, and not contacting witnesses.]
Asif_Sultan_Syeda_vs_UT_of_J_K.pdf op[ke[k
न्यायालय को सुल्तान के आचरण पर संदेह करने का कोई कारण नहीं मिला और साथ ही उसके न्याय से भागने की कोई संभावना नहीं थी, फिर भी जमानत की शर्तों के रूप में सुल्तान की संचार विधियों और गतिविधियों पर कड़े प्रतिबंध लगाए गए।
kerala hc UAPA order march 17 2022.pdf
The High Court delivered an order in three criminal revision petitions filed against the orders of a Sessions Court rejecting applications for discharge. The revision petitioner was charged with offenses under the Indian Penal Code and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act for being a member of a banned Maoist organization. The key issues were whether there was delay in sanction by the government violating timelines under the rules, and if so whether it vitiated cognizance taken by the special court. The court heard arguments on whether the timelines were mandatory or directory, and if the delayed sanctions invalidated prosecution of the petitioner.
Allah hc order mohd. faizan v. state of up
This document summarizes a court case in India challenging a show-cause notice issued to deposit damages for public property. The petitioner's counsel argued the notice violated Supreme Court guidelines requiring an independent claims commissioner to investigate liability. While the respondent cited a pending Supreme Court case, the court ruled the notice's authority was also being challenged in that case. It stayed the notice's effect until the Supreme Court makes a determination and the petitioner agreed to abide by the Supreme Court's final order.
Allahabad hc tablighi order
The court heard a bail application for 7 Bangladeshi nationals who were arrested for violating laws during the COVID-19 pandemic. The court granted interim bail to 5 applicants and held the 6th applicant's request pending extension of their expired visa. Strict conditions were imposed, including adherence to visa terms and regular reporting. The Ministry of External Affairs was directed to facilitate the applicants' participation in their trial and discuss their cases with Bangladesh to possibly decide the matter without trial.
Allahabad hc tablighi order
The court heard a bail application for 7 Bangladeshi nationals who were arrested for violating laws during the COVID-19 pandemic. The court granted interim bail to 5 applicants and held the 6th applicant's request pending extension of their expired visa. Strict conditions were imposed, including residing at their visa address, not seeking trial adjournments, and surrendering before visa expiration. The Ministry of External Affairs was directed to assist in securing the applicants' participation in their trial before their visas expire.
Jharkhand hc order
This document is a court order from the High Court of Jharkhand regarding a criminal revision case filed by 6 petitioners seeking to set aside their conviction and sentence under the Railways Act.
The petitioners' counsel argued that the lower courts did not properly consider provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act and section 179(2) of the Railways Act when sentencing the petitioners to 1 year imprisonment. The State opposed bail for the petitioners.
The High Court suspended the petitioners' sentences, granted them bail upon furnishing personal bonds, and imposed conditions including each petitioner paying Rs. 35,000 to the PM CARES Fund and downloading the Aarogya Settu app. The
Orissa hc nsa order quashed dec 16
This document is a court judgment summarizing a case regarding a petition challenging an order of detention under the National Security Act. The key details are:
- The petitioner was detained under the NSA based on his involvement in multiple criminal cases.
- The petitioner argued that the detention order lacked sufficient details and relied on stale cases.
- The court analyzed previous judgments which established that a detention order must demonstrate a likelihood of prejudicial acts and threat to public order, not just criminal behavior.
- The court ultimately set aside the detention order, finding it did not sufficiently demonstrate how the petitioner threatened public order or that normal law was insufficient to address the situation.
Haq cent for child rights v state of up
The Chief Justice's Court heard a public interest litigation petition filed by the Haq Centre for Child Rights regarding the implementation of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 in Uttar Pradesh. The petitioner's society had inspected and reported on the application of the Act's provisions in the state. The court ordered the State of Uttar Pradesh to file a response with details about the application of the Act in each district by the next hearing date of December 14th, 2020.
Scr.a88942020 gjhc240605762020 5_26082021
1) The petitioner challenged an order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Police externig him from several districts for one year.
2) The High Court stayed the execution of the externment order citing issues with it.
3) In its final order, the High Court quashed the externment order, finding that the order relied on two FIRs not mentioned in the notice given to the petitioner and that one of the FIRs mentioned in the notice was for demonstrating against a government policy wherein citizens have a right to raise grievances. The Court also noted inconsistencies in the responses by the authorities.
Patna hc order (1)
This document summarizes three petitions heard by the Patna High Court regarding the right to healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic in Bihar, India. It discusses the constitutional right to health and life under Article 21 and the state's duty to provide medical infrastructure and treatment. It notes the massive surge in COVID cases in Bihar in 2021 and orders the state to take steps to improve oxygen supply and healthcare infrastructure to treat patients.
guj hc order RTI.pdf
This judgment involves a petition filed by Swati Rajiv Goswami seeking publication of rules framed by the police under Section 33 of the Gujarat Police Act, 1951 as well as publication and online access to all rules, regulations, instructions, manuals, and records used by the police. The petitioner's request for permission to hold a peaceful protest was denied by the police. When the petitioner sought information about the rules under which the request was processed, the information was refused. The court examines whether the petitioner has a right to know the rules under which police regulate public assemblies and processions.
Chand mohammad pre arrest bail order
1) The court heard arguments from the counsel for the applicant Mohd. Chand and the counsel for the state in a criminal case involving sections 153A, 295, 505, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the IPC.
2) The applicant was seeking anticipatory bail in a case involving allegations of disrespecting religious feelings and disturbing communal harmony by performing namaz inside a temple.
3) The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant with conditions including surrendering his passport, not contacting witnesses, and appearing for key court hearings.
Madras hc anti caa cases quashed
The court quashed criminal proceedings against two petitioners who were accused of protesting against the Citizenship Amendment Act in 2019. The court found that while the petitioners' protest was unlawful for lacking proper permission, it was a peaceful protest and no criminal acts occurred. Further, witness statements did not properly identify the petitioners as being involved. Prior court rulings established the right to peaceful protest. Thus, the court concluded there was no prima facie evidence against the petitioners and continuing the prosecution would be an abuse of process.
20200227 idrishali gauhatihc
The petitioner challenged a Foreigners Tribunal opinion declaring him a foreigner. The Tribunal had rejected key evidence like voter lists showing the petitioner (Exhibits 6-7), finding inconsistencies. However, the High Court found the Tribunal's appreciation of Exhibits 6-7 to be perverse, as Tribunals have relaxed evidentiary standards compared to courts. The opinion was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration of Exhibits 6-7. The petitioner was also ordered to be produced before the Tribunal on a date for a bail application to be considered, with the proceeding to conclude within 60 days.
Similar to Guj hc june 23 order (20)
More from ZahidManiyar
Letter to-dgp-18 oct21
1. The families of prisoners held in Taloja Central Prison and Byculla Women's Prison wrote a letter regarding the discontinuation of weekly telephone interviews for family members when physical visits resume.
2. They expressed concern that discontinuing phone calls would cause problems for out-of-town family members who cannot easily travel to Mumbai for physical visits, as well as economically weak and elderly relatives.
3. The letter requested that phone interviews be allowed to continue in a hybrid model, where Mumbai-based relatives could choose a physical or phone visit, to ensure prisoners' right to communicate with family and advocates as guaranteed by the Indian Constitution.
Tripura hc order
The High Court of Tripura issued an order directing the State of Tripura Aids Control Society to be impleaded as a respondent. The State and Union of India were directed to issue guidelines to conduct a thorough research of all persons in State prisons to ascertain if any are infected with HIV. If any infected persons are found, necessary action must be taken for their treatment and care in accordance with law to prevent an epidemic. A report on the matter must be submitted to the court by November 9, 2021. The court also requested an Amicus Curiae to assist and oversee the matter.
Report vigilantism and attack on the freedom of religion in meerut
This document summarizes an incident of communal violence and vigilantism in Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India. It discusses the history of communal tensions and riots in Meerut dating back to the 1930s. On September 20, 2017, two members of the Jehovah's Witnesses religious group were invited into a Hindu man's home but then detained against their will for over an hour, assaulted, and handed over to the police with false allegations of forced conversion efforts. The police refused to register a complaint about the assault and illegally detained the victims overnight without medical treatment. The document analyzes this incident as an example of the shift in India to smaller scale vigilantism targeting religious minorities, with the tacit support
Christians under attack_in_india_report
The document provides a summary of attacks on Christians in India, including two specific incidents in Roorkee and Mau, Uttar Pradesh:
1) In Roorkee, a mob of 250-300 people attacked a church, injuring several attendees. Police did not provide security despite prior complaints.
2) In Mau, a mob accused Christians of conversion during a prayer meeting. Seven people including the pastor were arrested under anti-conversion laws.
It also lists other incidents of threats, violence and false accusations against Christians in various parts of Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and other states, indicating growing targeted attacks against the Christian minority in India.
Sharjeel imam vs state
The document discusses an application for bail filed by Sharjeel Imam. It summarizes the key details of the case, including the charges against Imam related to speeches he delivered on December 13th and 15th, 2019 regarding protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act. While the prosecution argues Imam's speeches incited violence, the judge found the evidence linking Imam's speeches to subsequent acts of violence by co-accused to be scanty and inconclusive. The judge granted Imam bail for offenses related to inciting violence but will further examine charges of sedition against Imam.
Sharjeel imam vs state
The document discusses a bail application hearing for Sharjeel Imam. It summarizes the key details of the case, including the charges against Imam related to speeches he delivered on December 13th and 15th, 2019 regarding protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act. It notes that while the prosecution argues Imam's speeches incited violence, the defense argues there is no evidence linking Imam's words to any criminal acts. In its ruling, the court finds the evidence against Imam for abetting offenses to be insufficient and scanty.
Ramesh kumar order
This document summarizes a court case revision petition hearing. The judge stayed the operation of the previous court order from October 12, 2021 until the next hearing date of November 12, 2021. The revision petition notice was ordered to be issued to the respondents. The trial court record was reviewed and the special public prosecutor and police inspector were present to provide submissions.
Cmm order
This document is a court order from a case involving multiple accused persons. It summarizes proceedings from a hearing where the prosecution requested more time for further investigation into the case. The court allowed more time but imposed a cost of Rs. 25,000 to be split among the accused, noting delays in the investigation. It also ordered the Secretary of Home Affairs to inquire about responsibility for the costs being imposed and deducting the amount from the responsible officer's salary. The case was adjourned to a future date for further proceedings.
Archbishop --press-statement
The Archbishop of Bangalore expresses concern over the Karnataka government's plan to survey Christian missionaries and places of worship. He argues that such surveys could unfairly target and endanger the Christian community. The Archbishop questions why only Christians are being surveyed, noting that Christians constitute a small percentage of the population. He calls on the government to respect constitutional protections of religious freedom and consider the educational and social services provided by Christian institutions instead of pursuing anti-conversion policies.
For website 211014 cjp-ncm complaint over muslim family in indore chairperson...
The complaint alleges that a Muslim family in Indore, Madhya Pradesh was attacked by a mob of 150 people associated with the RSS on October 9, 2021. The family was threatened and told to leave the village. Family members sustained head injuries and their house was ransacked. The police delayed registering an FIR and instead filed a counter-complaint against the family. The complaint cites other recent incidents of violence and harassment against Muslims in Indore and calls on the National Commission for Minorities to investigate and take action to prevent further attacks.
For website 211013 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to vice chairman (1)
The complaint alleges that on October 10, 2021 in Mau, Uttar Pradesh, two incidents occurred where Christian religious gatherings were disrupted by Hindu nationalist mobs. In one incident, two nuns were attacked, dragged to the police station and detained for hours on baseless allegations of religious conversion. In another incident, a Christian prayer service was raided and the pastor and congregants were taken to the police station. The complaint urges the National Commission for Minorities to investigate these attacks, ensure protection for religious minorities, condemn the attacks and pressure authorities to take swift action. It notes a pattern of increasing attacks on Christians in India by Hindu nationalist groups.
For website 21103 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to chairperson (1)
1. Citizens for Justice and Peace wrote to the National Commission for Minorities regarding two attacks on Christians in Mau, Uttar Pradesh on October 10, 2021. In the first incident, a mob attacked two nuns and their driver at a bus stand and took them to the police station. In the second incident, a mob disrupted a Christian prayer service and took the pastor and worshippers to the police station.
2. The letter requests that the Commission conduct an inquiry into the attacks, ensure protection for religious minorities, condemn the attacks and urge police to take action, and issue guidelines for dealing with communally motivated attacks. It argues that such attacks violate constitutional rights and aim to subjugate minority communities through fear.
Aiufwp eia response (1) converted
The document is a response letter from the All India Union of Forest Working People (AIUFWP) regarding the draft EIA Notification 2020. The key points made in the letter are:
1) The AIUFWP demands a complete withdrawal of the draft EIA Notification 2020 as it weakens environmental protections and public participation in decision making.
2) The draft was released during a national lockdown without proper accessibility or consideration of forest communities who will be most impacted.
3) Weakening environmental regulations could exacerbate future pandemics by further damaging nature.
4) The draft favors industries and projects over environmental protection by reducing scrutiny and exempting many from public hearings and consent requirements.
Maulana fazlul order
The applicant Maulana Fazlul Karim Qasimi was arrested in August 2021 for a Facebook post expressing the view that the Taliban in Afghanistan are not terrorists. The applicant's lawyer argued that the court had granted bail to someone in a similar case for expressing such an opinion. While reviewing the case diary, the court found nothing incriminating against the applicant beyond the Facebook post. Given the lack of other evidence, the court doubted if the post alone constituted a cognizable offense. Therefore, the court directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a bond, finding further custody unnecessary in this case.
Maqbool alam order
The document is a 3-page court order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a bail application filed by Maqbool Alam, who was charged with several offenses including praising a terrorist organization on Facebook. The court heard arguments from Alam's lawyer and the public prosecutor. Upon reviewing the Facebook posts and finding that they did not require further custodial interrogation, the court granted bail to Alam subject to furnishing a bond and ensuring he does not interfere with the investigation.
Kerala hc order d rajagopal-v-ayyappan-anr-402210
This document summarizes two criminal revision petitions filed in the High Court of Kerala against judgments from lower courts. The lower courts had found police officers guilty of assaulting a complainant while he was in custody. The police officers argue on appeal that the lower courts erred in not requiring sanction from the state government before prosecuting public servants. The High Court examines the evidence and finds that the injuries occurred while the complainant was in police custody, supporting his allegation that police assaulted him at the police station lockup. Medical evidence also supports the complainant's version of events. The High Court dismisses the criminal revision petitions filed by the police officers.
Kpss security of kp's - 05.10.2021
The Kashmiri Pandit Sangarash Samiti (KPSS) wrote a letter to the Lieutenant Governor of Jammu and Kashmir regarding the security of non-migrant Kashmiri Pandits and Hindus living in the Kashmir Valley. KPSS has submitted communications over the past year requesting a meeting about this issue, but their requests have been ignored. Over the past 10 days, intelligence reports indicate prominent Kashmiri Pandit/Hindu businessmen will be targeted, and one was killed on October 5th. KPSS warns that if another Pandit/Hindu is killed due to administrative and security failures, they will file a petition with the International Human Rights Commission and launch a signature campaign against the administration for neglect
Lakhimpur kheri press statement from ct_us_06102021
The Central Trade Unions strongly condemned the killing of farmers protesting in Lakhimpur Kheri, Uttar Pradesh. They demanded the resignation of the Minister of State for Home and stringent punishment for the culprits. The trade unions also condemned the police for preventing opposition leaders and union leaders from visiting the families of the deceased. They reiterated their support for farmers in their struggle against the farm laws.
Allahabad hc wpil(a) 1585 2021
This document summarizes a court order from a Public Interest Litigation case in the State of Uttar Pradesh, India. The order lists several related cases to be heard together on October 22nd. It notes that two specific cases were not listed as directed in a previous order and threatens action against the responsible registry officer. It also directs the respondents to provide the petitioner's counsel a copy of the counter affidavit filed in connected writ petitions.
Mp hc wp 9320 2021_order_30-sep-2021
The document discusses two writ petitions related to prison overcrowding and conditions in Madhya Pradesh. It summarizes the suggestions provided by an amicus curiae to improve prison conditions, which include establishing women's prisons, borstal schools for youth offenders, mental health services, vocational training programs, healthcare facilities, sanitation infrastructure, educational opportunities, and recreational activities for inmates. The court acknowledges the urgent need for prison reforms and decongesting the prisons in the state.
More from ZahidManiyar (20)
Report vigilantism and attack on the freedom of religion in meerut
Report vigilantism and attack on the freedom of religion in meerut
For website 211014 cjp-ncm complaint over muslim family in indore chairperson...
For website 211014 cjp-ncm complaint over muslim family in indore chairperson...
For website 211013 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to vice chairman (1)
For website 211013 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to vice chairman (1)
For website 21103 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to chairperson (1)
For website 21103 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to chairperson (1)
Lakhimpur kheri press statement from ct_us_06102021
Lakhimpur kheri press statement from ct_us_06102021
Recently uploaded
Youngest c m in India- Pema Khandu Biography
Pema Khandu, born on August 21, 1979, is an Indian politician and the Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh. He is the son of former Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh, Dorjee Khandu. Pema Khandu assumed office as the Chief Minister in July 2016, making him one of the youngest Chief Ministers in India at that time.
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75LUMINATIVE MEDIA/PROJECT COUNSEL MEDIA GROUP
From his beginnings with a daily newspaper, he moved easily through Newsweek magazine to cable news and, later, to the frontiers of online journalism.A draft Ukraine-Russia treaty from April 2022
A draft Ukraine-Russia treaty from April 2022, published here in full for the first time.
Snigdha-Sreenath-Minor-v-Travancore-Devaswom-Board-WPCNO-39847-OF-2023-2024-L...
केरल उच्च न्यायालय ने 11 जून, 2024 को मंडला पूजा में भाग लेने की अनुमति मांगने वाली 10 वर्षीय लड़की की रिट याचिका को खारिज कर दिया, जिसमें सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की एक बड़ी पीठ के समक्ष इस मुद्दे की लंबित प्रकृति पर जोर दिया गया। यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति अनिल के. नरेंद्रन और न्यायमूर्ति हरिशंकर वी. मेनन की खंडपीठ द्वारा पारित किया गया
在线办理(latrobe毕业证书)拉筹伯大学毕业证Offer一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(latrobe毕业证书)拉筹伯大学毕业证》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
13062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptx
Discover the essential tools and strategies for modern PR business success. Learn how to craft compelling news releases, leverage press release sites and news wires, stay updated with PR news, and integrate effective PR practices to enhance your brand's visibility and credibility. Elevate your PR efforts with our comprehensive guide.
Recently uploaded (8)
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75
Snigdha-Sreenath-Minor-v-Travancore-Devaswom-Board-WPCNO-39847-OF-2023-2024-L...
Snigdha-Sreenath-Minor-v-Travancore-Devaswom-Board-WPCNO-39847-OF-2023-2024-L...
Guj hc june 23 order
- 1. R/CR.MA/8507/2020 ORDER Page 1 of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 8507 of 2020 ========================================================== RAVI S/O. VINOD GUPTA & 32 OTHERS Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ========================================================== Appearance: MR NIRAV R MISHRA, ADVOCATE for the Applicants MR MITESH AMIN, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR with MR HARDIK SONI, APP for the Respondent-STATE ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY Date : 23/06/2020 ORAL ORDER 1. This application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for regular bail in connection with C.R.No.11191020201055 of 2020 registered with Vastrapur Police Station, District : Ahmedabad for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 144, 147, 148, 149, 186, 332, 333, 336, 337, 427 and 188 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 135(1) of the Gujarat Police Act, Section 3 of the Epidemic Act, 1897, Section 51(b) of the Disaster Management Act and Section 3(1) and 3(2)(e) of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act. 2. Rule. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of rule for the State. Downloaded on : Wed Jun 24 17:28:10 IST 2020
- 2. R/CR.MA/8507/2020 ORDER Page 2 of 3 3. Heard learned advocate for the applicants and the learned Public Prosecutor through Video Conferencing. 4. Learned advocate for the applicants has submitted that, of the total 33 applicants, 32 are from the State of Jharkhand and one is from the State of West Bengal. All the applicants had come to Ahmedabad for labour work and were working at the construction site of New IIM building at Vastrapur, Ahmedabad. It is submitted that in the lockdown, the applicants were without any work, without any money and even without any food and under these circumstances, they wanted to go back their home, which led to the alleged untoward incident on 18.05.2020, which led to registration of the offence in question, wherein as many as 35 persons are named as accused. It is submitted that, the applicants are in jail since 18.05.2020 and they be granted bail. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor for the State has submitted that considering the totality, appropriate order be passed by the Court. 6. Having heard learned advocates for the respective parties and having considered the material on record, this Court finds that, this is the fit case to exercise the discretion to release the applicants on bail, in exercise of powers under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. 7. It is noted that, in the lockdown, when the applicants were without any work, without any money and even without any food and under such circumstances, instead of arranging Downloaded on : Wed Jun 24 17:28:10 IST 2020
- 3. R/CR.MA/8507/2020 ORDER Page 3 of 3 of their going back home, they are sent to jail. The Applicants are more the victims, certainly not the criminals. They need not be continued in custody any further. They need to be set free immediately, on furnishing their personal bond, without any further condition. 8. In view of above, the following order is passed. 8.1 This application is allowed. 8.2 All the applicants are ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with C.R.No.11191020201055 of 2020 registered with Vastrapur Police Station, District : Ahmedabad on their executing personal bond of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred only), each. 8.3 Rule is made absolute in above terms. (PARESH UPADHYAY, J) ALI ISTAYAK/BHATI/01 Downloaded on : Wed Jun 24 17:28:10 IST 2020