Minimizing Risk within Your Organization by Auditing Your Employment PoliciesQuarles & Brady
This document discusses how organizations can minimize employment risks by auditing their policies. It recommends auditing policies related to equal employment opportunities, hiring and firing practices, wage and hour compliance, protecting confidential information, workplace safety, and record keeping. Conducting these audits can help identify policy deficiencies, reduce organizational risk, and support strategic objectives. The document provides examples of litigation and enforcement trends to demonstrate employment areas that commonly expose organizations to risks.
This document summarizes the findings of a study on employment equality law in Ireland regarding claimants, representation, and outcomes between 2001-2007. Some key findings include:
- The majority (59%) of claimants were female and most common grounds were gender, age, disability, and race.
- The claimant failure rate was high, with 65% losing outright and 11% having partial failure.
- Private sector claimants had higher success rates than public sector claimants.
- Legal representation and trade unions were the most common and most successful forms of representation.
- Redress for successful claimants included compensation, loss of earnings awards, and policy/procedure changes.
Check out this newsletter for a quick read on some recent OSHA updates. Murphy Insurance recently put on a free seminar regarding some of these updates so email me anytime at Leif.Erickson@MurphyInsurance.com to get yourself added to our seminar mailing list.
The document summarizes recent guidance from the EEOC and FTC on employer use of background checks. It discusses concerns that criminal record exclusions can disproportionately impact certain racial groups. The new guidance recommends employers conduct targeted background checks narrowly tailored to essential job duties, allow for individual assessments, and address inaccuracies in criminal records. It also stresses compliance with antidiscrimination laws and the Fair Credit Reporting Act when obtaining and using background check information.
This document discusses how companies need to update their social media policies to address employer liability issues and comply with laws protecting employee rights. It provides examples of policies that have been deemed lawful or unlawful by the NLRB and EEOC. The NLRB in particular has taken an expansive view of protected concerted activities, finding that many existing social media and confidentiality policies could chill employees' rights under federal law to discuss terms of employment. The document advises employers to limit restrictive language and clearly define confidential information in policies.
This document summarizes key information from the June 2010 issue of TN Workers' Comp Chronicle, a legal publication about Tennessee workers' compensation law and cases. It discusses a new law that grants the Department of Labor primary jurisdiction over future medical benefit disputes. It also outlines upcoming certification requirements for adjusters, bill reviewers, and supervisors handling TN workers' comp claims. Finally, it summarizes several recent TN appellate court cases related to issues like compensability of parking lot injuries, statute of limitations for hearing loss claims, and the willful misconduct defense.
Minimizing Risk within Your Organization by Auditing Your Employment PoliciesQuarles & Brady
This document discusses how organizations can minimize employment risks by auditing their policies. It recommends auditing policies related to equal employment opportunities, hiring and firing practices, wage and hour compliance, protecting confidential information, workplace safety, and record keeping. Conducting these audits can help identify policy deficiencies, reduce organizational risk, and support strategic objectives. The document provides examples of litigation and enforcement trends to demonstrate employment areas that commonly expose organizations to risks.
This document summarizes the findings of a study on employment equality law in Ireland regarding claimants, representation, and outcomes between 2001-2007. Some key findings include:
- The majority (59%) of claimants were female and most common grounds were gender, age, disability, and race.
- The claimant failure rate was high, with 65% losing outright and 11% having partial failure.
- Private sector claimants had higher success rates than public sector claimants.
- Legal representation and trade unions were the most common and most successful forms of representation.
- Redress for successful claimants included compensation, loss of earnings awards, and policy/procedure changes.
Check out this newsletter for a quick read on some recent OSHA updates. Murphy Insurance recently put on a free seminar regarding some of these updates so email me anytime at Leif.Erickson@MurphyInsurance.com to get yourself added to our seminar mailing list.
The document summarizes recent guidance from the EEOC and FTC on employer use of background checks. It discusses concerns that criminal record exclusions can disproportionately impact certain racial groups. The new guidance recommends employers conduct targeted background checks narrowly tailored to essential job duties, allow for individual assessments, and address inaccuracies in criminal records. It also stresses compliance with antidiscrimination laws and the Fair Credit Reporting Act when obtaining and using background check information.
This document discusses how companies need to update their social media policies to address employer liability issues and comply with laws protecting employee rights. It provides examples of policies that have been deemed lawful or unlawful by the NLRB and EEOC. The NLRB in particular has taken an expansive view of protected concerted activities, finding that many existing social media and confidentiality policies could chill employees' rights under federal law to discuss terms of employment. The document advises employers to limit restrictive language and clearly define confidential information in policies.
This document summarizes key information from the June 2010 issue of TN Workers' Comp Chronicle, a legal publication about Tennessee workers' compensation law and cases. It discusses a new law that grants the Department of Labor primary jurisdiction over future medical benefit disputes. It also outlines upcoming certification requirements for adjusters, bill reviewers, and supervisors handling TN workers' comp claims. Finally, it summarizes several recent TN appellate court cases related to issues like compensability of parking lot injuries, statute of limitations for hearing loss claims, and the willful misconduct defense.
The Equality Act of 2010 harmonized UK discrimination law and extended some protections to new groups. One key aspect was restrictions on pre-employment health questions. Currently, many employers ask health questions or require questionnaires before offering jobs. However, the Equality Act only allows health inquiries before offering a job in limited circumstances, such as when questions are necessary to establish if a candidate can perform intrinsic job functions. Employers must also avoid questions about previous health conditions and may face legal claims if their questions violate the Act. It is generally safest for employers to avoid health questions until after making a job offer, unless specific job requirements clearly warrant such inquiries.
The document outlines terms and conditions for an employer to agree to regarding consortium training. It states that:
1) The Westmoreland-Fayette Workforce Investment Board will create an employer profile if one does not already exist and list the employer as a point of contact for matters related to the training.
2) The employer agrees to provide student information including name, SSN, gender, race, ethnicity, and worker status for all employees participating in the training in order for them to be eligible for reimbursement.
3) The completed form should be emailed or faxed to Greg Schwing at the Westmoreland-Fayette WIB by the authorized employer representative.
Seven Hiring Mistakes that Could Cost You ThousandsPatrick Barnett
This document discusses 7 common hiring mistakes that can cost companies thousands of dollars:
1. Not conducting thorough criminal background checks in all relevant counties and databases. Incomplete checks increase the risk of negligent hiring lawsuits.
2. Failing to use proper consent and disclosure forms required by the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) when conducting background checks, which can result in large fines.
3. Ignoring FCRA requirements to notify applicants and give them a chance to respond before taking adverse action based on background check results.
4. Not adjusting background check policies to comply with FCRA, state laws, and EEOC guidelines, which can also result in fines or lawsuits.
Too Much Information: The Use and Misuse of Pre-Employment Inquiries, Applica...Parsons Behle & Latimer
This document summarizes a seminar on pre-employment inquiries, applications, background checks, and credit checks. It discusses key principles such as only asking questions related to job qualifications and not discriminating against protected classes. It also reviews which questions are allowed or not allowed during different stages of hiring like applications and interviews. The document provides an overview of laws governing these areas like Title VII, ADA, GINA, and FCRA and explains employer responsibilities and best practices for compliance.
This document discusses pre-employment background investigations that employers conduct, including drug/alcohol screening, criminal records checks, and other types of investigations. It notes that drug/alcohol screening is common and can be done through blood, urine, or hair tests, with urine being the most frequent method. Criminal records checks vary in scope from just the state to a full FBI records search, but employers must consider arrests separately from convictions due to bias. Overall, background checks aim to protect employers and customers but also require complying with laws around medical privacy and bias.
Background checks can be helpful tools in guiding your hiring choices, as well as subsequent decisions. Once you've used them and won't need them again for awhile, it's easy to tuck these reports away in a file and forget them. But, like most aspects of business, the handling of background checks is subject to government rules.
EEOC SETTLES RETALIATION LAWSUIT AGAINST ADECCOVogelDenise
The EEOC settled a retaliation lawsuit against staffing firm Adecco USA Inc. for $62,500. The lawsuit charged that Adecco disciplined and fired an office manager after he supported his supervisor's sexual harassment complaint against their boss. As part of the settlement, Adecco agreed to provide employee training on laws against retaliation. The EEOC takes retaliation claims seriously and employers cannot take action against employees for their involvement in discrimination claims.
Educaterer India is an unique combination of passion driven into a hobby which makes an awesome profession. We carve the lives of enthusiastic candidates to a perfect professional who can impress upon the mindsets of the industry, while following the established traditions, can dare to set new standards to follow. We don't want you to be the part of the crowd, rather we like to make you the reason of the crowd.
Today's Effort For A Better Tomorrow
The document discusses criminal law and employment law issues that can arise when an employee's criminal conduct outside of work impacts their employment. It provides information on:
1) The test for determining if an employee can be dismissed for criminal conduct outside of work, which requires that the conduct damages the employment relationship or the employer's interests.
2) Examples of cases where employees were or were not dismissed based on this test.
3) Rules around workplace drug testing and policies, and cases related to drug use and driving under the influence.
4) When dishonesty or deception outside of work could provide grounds for dismissal if it impacts trust in the employment relationship.
Stuart presented on medical marijuana in the workplace at a LegalEase Breakfast Seminar hosted by the Human Resources Professional Association (HRPA) on February 25, 2016.
According to an informal study, only 20% of job applicants had no criminal or driving history. 52% of applicants with one offense had multiple issues in their history. Additionally, 30% of resumes contain inaccurate information about work experience, education, or job titles. Thorough background checks including criminal, driving, and education/employment histories can help identify concerning inaccuracies or issues in an applicant's background. However, employers must ensure background check policies do not have an unlawful discriminatory impact and consider the nature and severity of any offenses. Two ongoing lawsuits are challenging hiring policies based on past arrests.
The document summarizes a judicial review case brought by the Durand Academy Trust against Ofsted regarding Ofsted's complaints procedure. The court found Ofsted's complaints procedure to be unfair because it did not allow for substantive challenges to inspection reports that found a school to require special measures. As a result, the court quashed the Ofsted report for the Durand Academy Trust. The outcome means Ofsted will need to revisit its complaints procedure to address the court's findings and avoid future challenges regarding the fairness of inspections.
This document provides an overview of whistleblower and retaliation protection. It defines a whistleblower as someone who reveals wrongdoing within an organization, and notes they are protected from retaliation under various workplace safety and other laws. It highlights a success story where the Labor Department sought damages for a wrongly terminated employee who filed an OSHA complaint. Information is also given on where and how to report issues of wrongdoing or retaliation.
Affirmative Action must be taken by covered employers to recruit and advance qualified minorities, women, persons with disabilities, and covered veterans. Affirmative Actions include training programs, outreach efforts, and other positive steps. These procedures should be incorporated into the company’s written personnel policies. Employers with written Affirmative Action programs must implement them, keep them on file and update them annually.
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is responsible for enforcing federal laws that make it illegal to discriminate against employees or job applicants based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or genetic information. The EEOC has the authority to investigate discrimination charges against covered employers, make findings, try to settle charges, and file lawsuits if needed. It also provides guidance on anti-discrimination laws and regulations, conducts outreach and education programs, and offers additional assistance through social media and its website.
Karl Ulrich, Esq., Shareholder at Sebaly Shillito + Dyer and OSBA Board Certified Labor & Employment Law Specialist, gave a presentation at OhioMeansJobs, 4631 Dixie Highway in Fairfield, Ohio with Matt Messersmith
of Signet Pre-Employment Screening. They explored information to consider when hiring new employees.
This document summarizes resources for researching employment law issues related to banning the box and criminal background checks. It provides an overview of relevant primary and secondary sources.
The document first discusses background checks and their disproportionate impact on protected classes. It then summarizes key internet sources like the EEOC enforcement guidance and the All of Us or None initiative.
Next, it outlines important legal treatises on hiring and firing practices and the Labor and Employment Law treatise. Practice specific sources like a BNA Insights article on statistical tools for evaluating discrimination are also highlighted.
Finally, the document discusses relevant law review articles and American Law Reports that address issues like disparate impact discrimination from criminal background checks and public sector
Employment and Labor Law in 2014 How Has The Workplace ImprovedWendi Lazar
Employee rights saw some unusual developments in 2014. The Supreme Court ruled in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby that requiring private companies to provide birth control violated religious freedom, raising concerns about discrimination. New York increased its minimum wage and passed laws providing accommodations for pregnant workers and paid sick leave. However, a religious exemption clause and forced arbitration threaten anti-discrimination protections. Overall, changes in laws and policies both improved and worsened conditions for employees.
Stuart Rudner spoke at the Benefits3 Conference 2016 where he addressed medical marijuana; finding the balance between the duty to accommodate and the need to keep the workplace safe.
The document summarizes an employment discrimination case involving an Indigenous Australian woman named Ms. Vata-Meyer. She complained that a colleague made racially offensive comments towards her, including offering "black babies" candy and making references to racist terms. The Federal Circuit Court initially dismissed her case, but the Full Court of the Federal Court overturned this decision. The Full Court found issues with how the lower court analyzed the law and considered the evidence, particularly the context of the racially charged comments. The case highlights the challenges faced by plaintiffs in proving racial discrimination in Australian courts.
This document describes TheViddiverse, a proposed video social network for tweens ages 8-13. Some key points:
- It would be COPPA compliant and safe for kids, allowing them to upload parentally approved videos and watch over 120 hours of licensed programming.
- Tweens represent a large market of 25 million kids in the US with $45 billion in annual disposable income. However, they are currently using YouTube and Facebook in ways that break COPPA laws.
- TheViddiverse would provide a creative video editing studio for tweens to upload videos from phones/tablets/desktops and add filters, music, etc.
- They aim to partner with stars and
The Equality Act of 2010 harmonized UK discrimination law and extended some protections to new groups. One key aspect was restrictions on pre-employment health questions. Currently, many employers ask health questions or require questionnaires before offering jobs. However, the Equality Act only allows health inquiries before offering a job in limited circumstances, such as when questions are necessary to establish if a candidate can perform intrinsic job functions. Employers must also avoid questions about previous health conditions and may face legal claims if their questions violate the Act. It is generally safest for employers to avoid health questions until after making a job offer, unless specific job requirements clearly warrant such inquiries.
The document outlines terms and conditions for an employer to agree to regarding consortium training. It states that:
1) The Westmoreland-Fayette Workforce Investment Board will create an employer profile if one does not already exist and list the employer as a point of contact for matters related to the training.
2) The employer agrees to provide student information including name, SSN, gender, race, ethnicity, and worker status for all employees participating in the training in order for them to be eligible for reimbursement.
3) The completed form should be emailed or faxed to Greg Schwing at the Westmoreland-Fayette WIB by the authorized employer representative.
Seven Hiring Mistakes that Could Cost You ThousandsPatrick Barnett
This document discusses 7 common hiring mistakes that can cost companies thousands of dollars:
1. Not conducting thorough criminal background checks in all relevant counties and databases. Incomplete checks increase the risk of negligent hiring lawsuits.
2. Failing to use proper consent and disclosure forms required by the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) when conducting background checks, which can result in large fines.
3. Ignoring FCRA requirements to notify applicants and give them a chance to respond before taking adverse action based on background check results.
4. Not adjusting background check policies to comply with FCRA, state laws, and EEOC guidelines, which can also result in fines or lawsuits.
Too Much Information: The Use and Misuse of Pre-Employment Inquiries, Applica...Parsons Behle & Latimer
This document summarizes a seminar on pre-employment inquiries, applications, background checks, and credit checks. It discusses key principles such as only asking questions related to job qualifications and not discriminating against protected classes. It also reviews which questions are allowed or not allowed during different stages of hiring like applications and interviews. The document provides an overview of laws governing these areas like Title VII, ADA, GINA, and FCRA and explains employer responsibilities and best practices for compliance.
This document discusses pre-employment background investigations that employers conduct, including drug/alcohol screening, criminal records checks, and other types of investigations. It notes that drug/alcohol screening is common and can be done through blood, urine, or hair tests, with urine being the most frequent method. Criminal records checks vary in scope from just the state to a full FBI records search, but employers must consider arrests separately from convictions due to bias. Overall, background checks aim to protect employers and customers but also require complying with laws around medical privacy and bias.
Background checks can be helpful tools in guiding your hiring choices, as well as subsequent decisions. Once you've used them and won't need them again for awhile, it's easy to tuck these reports away in a file and forget them. But, like most aspects of business, the handling of background checks is subject to government rules.
EEOC SETTLES RETALIATION LAWSUIT AGAINST ADECCOVogelDenise
The EEOC settled a retaliation lawsuit against staffing firm Adecco USA Inc. for $62,500. The lawsuit charged that Adecco disciplined and fired an office manager after he supported his supervisor's sexual harassment complaint against their boss. As part of the settlement, Adecco agreed to provide employee training on laws against retaliation. The EEOC takes retaliation claims seriously and employers cannot take action against employees for their involvement in discrimination claims.
Educaterer India is an unique combination of passion driven into a hobby which makes an awesome profession. We carve the lives of enthusiastic candidates to a perfect professional who can impress upon the mindsets of the industry, while following the established traditions, can dare to set new standards to follow. We don't want you to be the part of the crowd, rather we like to make you the reason of the crowd.
Today's Effort For A Better Tomorrow
The document discusses criminal law and employment law issues that can arise when an employee's criminal conduct outside of work impacts their employment. It provides information on:
1) The test for determining if an employee can be dismissed for criminal conduct outside of work, which requires that the conduct damages the employment relationship or the employer's interests.
2) Examples of cases where employees were or were not dismissed based on this test.
3) Rules around workplace drug testing and policies, and cases related to drug use and driving under the influence.
4) When dishonesty or deception outside of work could provide grounds for dismissal if it impacts trust in the employment relationship.
Stuart presented on medical marijuana in the workplace at a LegalEase Breakfast Seminar hosted by the Human Resources Professional Association (HRPA) on February 25, 2016.
According to an informal study, only 20% of job applicants had no criminal or driving history. 52% of applicants with one offense had multiple issues in their history. Additionally, 30% of resumes contain inaccurate information about work experience, education, or job titles. Thorough background checks including criminal, driving, and education/employment histories can help identify concerning inaccuracies or issues in an applicant's background. However, employers must ensure background check policies do not have an unlawful discriminatory impact and consider the nature and severity of any offenses. Two ongoing lawsuits are challenging hiring policies based on past arrests.
The document summarizes a judicial review case brought by the Durand Academy Trust against Ofsted regarding Ofsted's complaints procedure. The court found Ofsted's complaints procedure to be unfair because it did not allow for substantive challenges to inspection reports that found a school to require special measures. As a result, the court quashed the Ofsted report for the Durand Academy Trust. The outcome means Ofsted will need to revisit its complaints procedure to address the court's findings and avoid future challenges regarding the fairness of inspections.
This document provides an overview of whistleblower and retaliation protection. It defines a whistleblower as someone who reveals wrongdoing within an organization, and notes they are protected from retaliation under various workplace safety and other laws. It highlights a success story where the Labor Department sought damages for a wrongly terminated employee who filed an OSHA complaint. Information is also given on where and how to report issues of wrongdoing or retaliation.
Affirmative Action must be taken by covered employers to recruit and advance qualified minorities, women, persons with disabilities, and covered veterans. Affirmative Actions include training programs, outreach efforts, and other positive steps. These procedures should be incorporated into the company’s written personnel policies. Employers with written Affirmative Action programs must implement them, keep them on file and update them annually.
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is responsible for enforcing federal laws that make it illegal to discriminate against employees or job applicants based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or genetic information. The EEOC has the authority to investigate discrimination charges against covered employers, make findings, try to settle charges, and file lawsuits if needed. It also provides guidance on anti-discrimination laws and regulations, conducts outreach and education programs, and offers additional assistance through social media and its website.
Karl Ulrich, Esq., Shareholder at Sebaly Shillito + Dyer and OSBA Board Certified Labor & Employment Law Specialist, gave a presentation at OhioMeansJobs, 4631 Dixie Highway in Fairfield, Ohio with Matt Messersmith
of Signet Pre-Employment Screening. They explored information to consider when hiring new employees.
This document summarizes resources for researching employment law issues related to banning the box and criminal background checks. It provides an overview of relevant primary and secondary sources.
The document first discusses background checks and their disproportionate impact on protected classes. It then summarizes key internet sources like the EEOC enforcement guidance and the All of Us or None initiative.
Next, it outlines important legal treatises on hiring and firing practices and the Labor and Employment Law treatise. Practice specific sources like a BNA Insights article on statistical tools for evaluating discrimination are also highlighted.
Finally, the document discusses relevant law review articles and American Law Reports that address issues like disparate impact discrimination from criminal background checks and public sector
Employment and Labor Law in 2014 How Has The Workplace ImprovedWendi Lazar
Employee rights saw some unusual developments in 2014. The Supreme Court ruled in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby that requiring private companies to provide birth control violated religious freedom, raising concerns about discrimination. New York increased its minimum wage and passed laws providing accommodations for pregnant workers and paid sick leave. However, a religious exemption clause and forced arbitration threaten anti-discrimination protections. Overall, changes in laws and policies both improved and worsened conditions for employees.
Stuart Rudner spoke at the Benefits3 Conference 2016 where he addressed medical marijuana; finding the balance between the duty to accommodate and the need to keep the workplace safe.
The document summarizes an employment discrimination case involving an Indigenous Australian woman named Ms. Vata-Meyer. She complained that a colleague made racially offensive comments towards her, including offering "black babies" candy and making references to racist terms. The Federal Circuit Court initially dismissed her case, but the Full Court of the Federal Court overturned this decision. The Full Court found issues with how the lower court analyzed the law and considered the evidence, particularly the context of the racially charged comments. The case highlights the challenges faced by plaintiffs in proving racial discrimination in Australian courts.
This document describes TheViddiverse, a proposed video social network for tweens ages 8-13. Some key points:
- It would be COPPA compliant and safe for kids, allowing them to upload parentally approved videos and watch over 120 hours of licensed programming.
- Tweens represent a large market of 25 million kids in the US with $45 billion in annual disposable income. However, they are currently using YouTube and Facebook in ways that break COPPA laws.
- TheViddiverse would provide a creative video editing studio for tweens to upload videos from phones/tablets/desktops and add filters, music, etc.
- They aim to partner with stars and
The document provides an overview and instructions for using a marketing playbook created by Engineers Australia. It explains that the playbook aims to promote consistency, coordination, and collaboration across marketing campaigns. It provides guidance on developing effective campaigns, executing them using various channels, reviewing results, and sharing successes. The playbook also includes templates for campaign planning and resources for things like graphic design standards and requesting marketing support.
Οι βασικές θέσεις των Ευρωπαίων και Ελλήνων διανοητών, προκειμένου να διαπιστώσουμε τους επηρεασμούς του Νεοελληνικού Διαφωτισμού από τα ευρωπαϊκά κινήματα και τις Επαναστάσεις που είχαν προηγηθεί.
Presentation for the Diamond Stallion Auction 2014, Breedings to Arabian Stallions offered for sale to the highest bidder - 90% of the proceeds of the Auction will be offered as prize money in a competition for the resulting yearlings.
El documento presenta una descripción de varios personajes de la serie de Los Pitufos. Entre ellos se encuentran Gargamel y Azrael, los villanos que intentan capturar a los Pitufos, y Papá Pitufo, el líder de la aldea Pitufa. También se mencionan a otros Pitufos como Pitufina, Fortachón, Filósofo y Bromista, y se brindan detalles sobre sus personalidades y roles dentro de la comunidad Pitufa.
Este documento é um mapa detalhado da região do Jalapão no Tocantins, Brasil. Ele mostra as principais cidades, estradas, rios, cachoeiras e atrações turísticas da região, como a Pousada Santa Helena em Mateiros, a 137 km de Palmas. O mapa fornece distâncias e direções para explorar as belezas naturais do Jalapão.
Este documento habla sobre el modelo 1:1 en educación, que se refiere a la distribución de una computadora por estudiante. Explica que originalmente se refería a computadoras de escritorio pero ahora son equipos portátiles con conexión a Internet. También describe algunas de las ventajas de este modelo como el acceso universal a la tecnología, la posibilidad de descargar contenidos y trabajar de forma colaborativa. Finalmente, señala que es importante pensar este modelo principalmente como un cambio didáctico y académico más que solo instrumental
Por que a digitalização é um processo importante?Netscan Digital
Descubra nessa apresentação como é importante a Gestão Eletrônica de Documentos. Um conteúdo super bacana que você pode conferir e saber mais sobre o processo de Digitalização de Documentos.
Terima kasih banyak bagi blog-blog atau website yang telah menyediakan banyak info sebagai sumber dari presentasi saya. Karena tanpa info-info tsb apalah ppt saya ini. Tetapi maaf sekali saya tidak sempat memasukkan daftar pustaka sehingga sumber-sumber tidak dapat dimuat. Sekali lagi saya minta maaf dan banyak berterima kasih.
Untuk para pembaca atau siapapun yang telah membuka PPT Kimia saya tentang Semi Logam (Metaloid) ini, semoga PPT saya ini sangat membantu kalian semua :) Selamat belajar!
La metrología estudia el uso de símbolos en las mediciones físicas. Por ejemplo, cuando se mide el estiramiento de un alambre al colgar un peso, se asigna un número al símbolo que representa el peso. Cualquier relación entre las mediciones se puede expresar mediante una expresión algebraica. Las leyes físicas y de medición describen rutinas de experiencia a través de símbolos algebraicos.
Sheet1Phase of Business Financal Management needsDebt FinancingEq.docxbjohn46
Sheet1Phase of Business/ Financal Management needsDebt FinancingEquity FinancingGift FinancingFinancing for StartupsConsumer Banks, Commercial Banks, SBA insured loans, Economic development agencies, Incubators, Accelerators, Leasing companies, Personal credit cardsFriends, family, Angels, Venture capital, direct public offering, CrowdfundingPersonal: Cash, pick up the tab, free use, free work, unpaid labor, overpayment, favored status/sweetheart deal forgiveness, deferralFinancing for GrowthCommercial banks, SBA, Private placement loans, Economic development agency, supplliers, leasing company, personal credit cardself generated funds, venture capital, direct public offering, merger, acquisitionInstitutional: SBIR, STTR grant, state grant, incubator, accelerator, dontated capital, tax abatement
Personal: Cash, pick up the tab, free use, free work, unpaid labor, overpayment, favored status/sweetheart deal forgiveness, deferralFinancing for Operationsfactor receivables, business cc, commercial bank, sba, private placement loans, suppliers, leasing companiesself generated funds, venture capital, direct public offeringInstitutional: SBIR, STTR grant, state grant, incubator, accelerator, dontated capital, tax abatement
Personal: Cash, pick up the tab, free use, free work, unpaid labor, overpayment, favored status/sweetheart deal forgiveness, deferralFinancing for Exitconsumer banks, Commercial Banks, SBA, private placement loans, economic development agencies, sba investment companies, suppliers, leasing companies, lines of creditself generate funds, venture capital, direct public offeringInstitutional: SBIR, STTR grant, state grant, incubator, accelerator, dontated capital, tax abatement
Personal: Cash, pick up the tab, free use, free work, unpaid labor, overpayment, favored status/sweetheart deal forgiveness, deferral
1
Email Communication Responses – No. 1 Employment Law Compliance Plan
Email Communication Responses – No. 1 Employment Law Compliance Plan
From:
To: “CEO Smith” [email protected][email protected]
Date: November 28, 2016
Re: Employment Law Compliance Plan
Mr. Smith:
With reference to the email sent to Nov.1, these are and will be the measures to take regarding your request
With the purpose of improving the operation of the company, it is necessary to review and update the policies of the company, as well as everything related to labor laws. This will provide the necessary means to comply with what is established by law and in turn with the company staff. If everything related to these issues is kept up to date, errors are less likely to be made when corrective measures are taken, just as it is of the utmost importance that all the members of the directive know in depth the laws that protect the workforce in all aspects. It is necessary to carry out the appropriate training as soon as possible. Remember that as a team, meeting these requirements is completely necessary.
Every decision taken, entails a res.
This document proposes a comprehensive sexual harassment policy for Arbor Building Services to comply with legal requirements and prevent costly lawsuits. It outlines the need for a policy due to a recent sexual harassment lawsuit filed against the company. The policy aims to clearly define harassment, establish procedures for reporting incidents and investigating complaints, ensure confidentiality, provide training to promote prevention, and designate an employee to coordinate compliance. Research cited shows sexual harassment claims and related costs to companies have sharply increased in recent years, emphasizing the importance of a strong policy.
There were major forces at work this past year that have made the labor and employment landscape in 2015 more dynamic and unpredictable than in recent years. A volatile political climate, still-sluggish economy, historic swing in the mid-term elections and aggressive federal initiatives have left many employers wondering what 2015 holds in store. In this report, we cover some of the hottest employment and health care trends, plus new payroll, tax and benefits information.
The document provides statistics on hiring at Symco Industries for engineering jobs in 2016. It asks questions about potential adverse impact in the hiring process based on these statistics. Specifically, it asks (a) if there is overall indication of discrimination based on the numbers, (b) if discrimination could be occurring at any stage of the process based on who, and (c) what argument the company could make in response to charges of discrimination. It then provides background on adverse impact analysis and different statistical tests that can be used to identify potential discrimination.
The document provides statistics on applications, interviews, tests, and job offers for men, women, minorities, and non-minorities for an engineering job at Symco Industries. It asks three questions: 1) Is there overall discrimination indicated by the statistics? 2) Is there potential discrimination at any stage of the process, and if so for whom? 3) What argument could the company make in response to charges of discrimination based on the analysis? It also provides background on how adverse impact analyses are used in evaluating equal employment opportunity considerations.
Running head ERISA AND EEOC1ERISA AND EEOC6.docxtodd271
Running head: ERISA AND EEOC 1
ERISA AND EEOC 6
Comparing and Contrasting ERISA and EEOC
Keri King
Module 5
Comparing and Contrasting ERISA and EEOC
Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) protects Americans’ retirement assets through the implementation of procedures that qualified plans must adhere to. In the context, the intention is ensuring that fiduciaries do not misuse plan assets. Moreover, it formulates minimum standards for participation, vesting, benefit accrual, and funding of retirement plans. In this case, participants in the retirement plan are entitled to sue either for benefits or breaches of fiduciary duty.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on the other hand, enforces federal laws regarding discrimination or harassment of job applicants or other employees in the United States of America. In the context, it investigates discrimination charges that are leveled against employers, companies being subject to the law if they have at least 15 employees. Unlike ERISA, EEOC highlights acceptable practices that employers should engage in as well as those that should be shunned. As an illustration, it provides that an employer should not publish a job advertisement that exhibits some preference for a group of people based on sex, color, age, and the like.
Although some similarities exist between ERISA and EEOC, it is worth noting that the functionality and provisions therein involve a great deal of differences. In my view, the appropriate methodology for the presentation of the differences would be the discussion of individual provisions of both ERISA and EEOC.
ERISA cover involves a myriad of benefits, one of which is medical, surgical, or hospital care. Under it, a participant who is admitted to medical facilities either for basic medical care or comprehensive check-up enjoys ERISA cover. The other benefit is that of sickness, accident, disability, or death. The implication in the case is that a participant who is admitted to the hospital enjoys full medical cover. Moreover, a beneficiary who suffers an accident and sustains an injury of whichever magnitude would receive some benefits to enable them to push on with a decent life. In case of death, however, the participant’s beneficiaries receive compensation for the avoidance of interruption of their lives due to the loss of the breadwinner. The cover also entails unemployment benefits for the extension of a stipend on a regular basis during the period of loss of employment (Anderson, 2015). In this case, the stipend may be extended on a monthly basis to enable the participant to cater to the needs of his family members. The cover also entails vacation benefits, whereby the participants who are on leave continue to enjoy the compensation benefits they would have if they were working. The benefits therein encourage participants to proceed on vacation, where they gain the opportunity to refresh and plan for future endeavors. Notably, the .
This document provides a summary of an HR safety training presentation on labor law issues and risks ("labor landmines") in 2017. It covers several topics:
1. Harassment/discrimination training requirements for California employers with 50+ employees.
2. Recent changes to the Fair Employment and Housing Act regulations in California regarding written policies, protected classifications, and anti-bullying training.
3. Considerations for employers regarding transgender employees' access to facilities, California law on harassment protections for unpaid interns/volunteers, and EEOC guidance on questioning prospective employees about HIV/AIDS.
HRM UNIT II Lesson 1 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (EEO)_58f235c213585377c241c...VielMarvinPBerbano
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) laws prohibit discrimination in hiring and employment decisions based on certain protected characteristics. Under EEO, all qualified candidates should have an equal chance of being hired or promoted based solely on job-related merits regardless of their race, gender, religion, or other protected attributes. EEO regulations require employers to make employment decisions only based on factors like qualifications, performance, and conduct, rather than personal characteristics. Employers who violate EEO laws can face lawsuits and penalties.
Employment Practices Liability Insurance (EPLI) and Workers CompensationTom Daly
Please join us for a discussion with Cleve Daigle, Vice President of Hartwig Moss Insurance Agency (HMIA). Below are some of the topics Cleve will be discussing.
Employment Practices Liability Insurance (EPLI):
- What types of employee-related lawsuits are covered?
- Facts about Employment Practices Lawsuits
- Best Defenses against Employment Practices Lawsuits
Worker's Compensation Insurance:
- History of Worker’s Compensation Insurance
- 4 Types of Benefits Provided by Worker’s Comp Insurance
- Employers Liability Coverage
- What’s Best for Business Owners - Worker’s Comp or Medical Insurance?
- Best Defenses against Employment Practices Lawsuits
This document summarizes the history and role of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and provides an overview of key US employment discrimination laws. It discusses the EEOC's establishment in 1965 to enforce antidiscrimination laws and its responsibilities to coordinate regulations, interpret laws, and support local agencies. The document also outlines various discriminatory practices prohibited by laws covering race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability status and more. Finally, it provides helpful hints for employers to promote diversity and inclusion in the workplace.
R2P Community Impact Guide 2013 8 22 (2)Julie Sweeney
This document summarizes guidance from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on how employers can safely limit the use of criminal records in hiring. It discusses how overuse of criminal records disproportionately impacts minority communities and can violate anti-discrimination laws. The EEOC guidance encourages individualized assessments of criminal histories that consider the nature of the offense, time since conviction, and relevance to the job. It recommends against blanket bans and considering arrests without convictions. The document provides best practices for employers, such as not asking about convictions initially, only using conviction records, limiting how far back convictions are considered, and giving applicants a chance to challenge reports. It encourages community members to educate employers on these issues.
How the Obama Administration has re-shaped the OFCCP into an aggressive enforcement arm of affirmative action and nondiscrimination compliance, and what it all means for your organization.
Even if you run a tight ship with respect to federal labor laws, it's wise to stay current on what the government considers hot-button issues. Doing so can be helpful as you monitor your company's practices and policies -- looking for areas that could create problems and push some of the hot buttons. Here's the latest summary of where the government is turning its spotlight of enforcement.
10 Trending Employee Relations Issues for 2016HR ACUITY LLC
This document discusses several trending employee relations issues for 2016, including same-sex marriage benefits, social media policies, tattoo policies, transgender employee policies, performance reviews, medical marijuana, "ban the box" policies, reverse mentoring, the Affordable Care Act employer mandate, and confidentiality in workplace investigations. Key issues around each topic center on balancing employee rights and privacy with business interests.
The document discusses key concepts in US employment law, including the employment-at-will doctrine and its exceptions, major federal statutes governing wages/hours and workplace safety/health, leave laws like FMLA, and protections against discrimination based on characteristics like race, gender, age, and disability under laws such as Title VII, EPA, ADEA, and ADA. Defenses to discrimination claims include business necessity, BFOQ, seniority systems, and after-acquired evidence of employee misconduct.
FINAL Employers Guide to Best Practices 2013 (1)Julie Sweeney
The document provides guidance to employers on safely limiting the use of criminal records in hiring. It advises that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has issued guidelines for employers related to adverse hiring actions based on criminal history. The EEOC's guidelines reflect disparities in incarceration rates among different racial groups. The employer should consider the nature of any offenses, time passed since conviction, and relevance to the job. Failure to comply with these and other federal laws like the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) could result in legal liability for employers.
The document provides information about Connecticut's mandatory training law for preventing sexual harassment. It summarizes that Connecticut law requires organizations with 50 or more employees to provide two hours of sexual harassment prevention training to supervisors and managers located in Connecticut. It must cover federal and state harassment laws, remedies, types of conduct, and strategies for prevention. Training can be delivered in-person, online, or through webinars, and documentation of training content and attendance is encouraged.
1. Griggs V. Duke Energy Co.
On September 17, 2014, the Equal Employment chance Commission (EEOCâ€) issued a press
launch announcing it really is suing BNV Home Care Agency, Inc. (BNVâ€) for techniques which
are prohibited by the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINAâ€).
Anyone believing that their employment legal rights were violated because of the forms of
discrimination covered by the national laws and regulations, or because of retaliation for opposing
job discrimination, processing a charge, or taking part in procedures under those regulations, may
lodge a charge of discrimination because of the EEOC. In many says, the charge should be recorded
within 300 days of the date associated with alleged discrimination. The EEOC will inform the
company within 10 days of obtaining a charge.
the product range of discriminatory methods prohibited by EEOC-enforced guidelines is much
broader than simply employing and firing. If a prohibited discriminatory motive could be the root
cause associated with the choice or action taken, an employer are held liable such places as
compensation, projects, transfers, promotions, layoffs and recalls, assessment, and fringe
advantages. The reach of the regulations can also be extended by catchall language prohibiting
discrimination in most conditions and terms†of work.
tips and reality sheets posted by the Department of Labor and on the EEOC's website are
particularly helpful. One of the most helpful information recently offered may be the EEOC's 2006
Compliance guide, available at Published in April 2006, the manual describes common issues and
best methods for businesses striving in order to prevent discriminatory practices.
The most significant recent improvement in civil-rights enforcement is reflected in EEOC's
admonition that supervisor training is a best training. Actually, the prevalence of supervisory
learning the office is paid utilizing the decrease in the number of instances of intimate harassment
recently. Ca happens to be a leader of this type using its state law mandate that companies offer
sexual harassment training to supervisors every 2 yrs.
2. It is unlawful for an employer to create work ad that presents a preference for or discourages
someone from applying for employment as a result of his or her race, color, faith, intercourse
(including pregnancy), nationwide beginning, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information.
Homepage
If work applicant with a disability needs an accommodation (such as for example an indicator
language interpreter) to try to get a job, the people finder background check employer must give
you the accommodation, provided that the accommodation cannot cause the company significant