Join us on the evening of Wednesday, April 24th, for the launch of the Green SEO movement. Discover how SEO practices can contribute to reducing the environmental impact of websites through sustainable digital strategies.
This event is an opportunity for SEO professionals, digital marketers, and anyone interested to connect with like-minded individuals and learn more about creating a sustainable approach to digital marketing and driving the green web revolution. To get inspired, we're excited to have the following speakers sharing their ideas:
- Green SEO: How SEOs can drive the Green Web Revolution - Stu Davies (Creative Bloom)
- The Green Software Revolution - Adam Newman & Oliver Winks (Green Software Brighton)
- Addressing Greenwashing - Natalie Arney (SEO Consultant)
Join us in taking steps towards a greener web. Reserve your free spot today and be part of the conversation on building a more sustainable digital future.
3. The
GreenSEO
manifesto
1. We will do all within our
power and influence to make
the web a greener place.
2. Each month we pledge to take
one action each towards this
goal.
3. We share, open source, support
and help advise each other.
4. We talk to people about the
impact of the web on the
environment and invite
like-minded souls to join the
greenSEO movement.
#greenSEO
GreenSEO
15. #greenSEO
GreenSEO
● Green SEO: How SEOs can drive the
Green Web Revolution - Stu Davies
(Creative Bloom)
● The Green Software Revolution - Adam
Newman & Oliver Winks (Green Software
Brighton)
● Addressing Greenwashing - Natalie
Arney
16. Green SEO:
How SEOs can
drive the Green
Web Revolution
Slideshare.Net/StuartDavies16
@creativebloomUK
Stuart Davies
Creative Bloom
GreenSEO
17. There is a BIG
problem
#greenSEO
@creativebloomUK
19. BY 2040 IT IS
EXPECTED TO BE
THE SECOND
1. CHINA
2. THE INTERNET
3. USA
4. INDIA
5. RUSSIA
6. JAPAN
7. GERMANY
*SOURCE WORLDOMETER
#greenSEO
@creativebloomUK
20. 1 ONLINE AD
CAMPAIGN = ⅓
annual CO2 FOR AN
avg US consumer**
@creativebloomUK
*GOOD LOOP
#greenSEO
88. A local tech community of people curious about how digital technologies
impact the environment.
Green Software Brighton
88
greensoftwarebrighton.co.uk
Talks, workshops, panels, roundtable discussions …
Supported by
NEXT
EVENT
93. 93
“there is no certainty that
adaptation to a 4°C world
is possible” World Bank
[a 4°C future] “is incompatible
with an organized global
community, is likely to be
beyond ‘adaptation’, is
devastating to the majority of
ecosystems, and has a high
probability of not being
stable” Prof. Kevin Anderson
● Annual flood damage costs of
$12tn
● 37% of world population exposed
to deadly heat waves once every 5
years
● 195 million people exposed to
severe drought
● 27% increase in land area for
malaria transmission
● 7% increase in rainfall in the British
Isles!
Carbon Brief
https://interactive.carbonbrief.org/impacts-climate-
change-one-point-five-degrees-two-degrees/
95. 95
Growth of Digital Technology
2015 2022 Change
Internet users 3 billion 5.3 billion +78%
Internet traffic 0.6 ZB 4.4 ZB +600%
Data centre workloads 180 million 800 million +340%
Data centre energy
use (excluding crypto)
200 TWh 240-340 TWh +20-70%
Crypto mining energy
use
4 TWh 100-150 TWh +2300-3500%
Data transmission
network energy use
220 TWh 260-360 TWh +18-64%
🤬🤬
🎉🎉
[4] Data centres & networks - IEA
96. By 2027 A.I. servers could use between 85 to 134 terawatt hours (Twh) annually
96
Growth of Digital Technology Continued…
[5] The growing energy footprint of artificial
intelligence, Alex de Vries
100. 100
As computers get quicker and cheaper, runtime performance
becomes less important (there’ll always be a faster computer
tomorrow). What’s more important is how fast you can get software
to market.
Dynamic Dependency Injection
Dynamic typing
Garbage Collection
Object Orientation
Just-in-time Compilation
Runtime Performance
Release time over runtime
102. 102
Hardware emits carbon.
Hardware exists to run software.
Why Software, not Hardware?
Hardware emits CO2:
Embodied + Running
Hardware efficiency problem?
What’s generating the demand?
ICT’s Dirty Secret
“How we design, implement
and run our Software is entirely
responsible for the magnitude of carbon
emissions from ICT”
103. 103
What can we do?
Design Patterns
Language & Frameworks
Data Types & Data Collections
Profiling Tools
Logging
Algorithmic Complexity
Compilers
++
Code Efficiency Carbon Awareness
“Do more when electricity is
clean, less when it’s dirty!”
Re-write? (£££££)
Prioritise optimisation by coverage
(SDLC) - opportunities to optimise for power consumption?
107. 107
Cultural Change
Let’s make software differently.
Be curious & geek out!
Recognise software’s role in tech
emissions.
“We think of software solely
as a tool to solve problems,
let’s recognise it is a
significant contributor to one
- climate change”
USERS SOFTWARE HARDWARE ENERGY CO2
108. 108
What Next?
Green Software Foundation
Green Web Foundation
ClimateAction.Tech (Slack)
Awesome Green Software (GitHub)
Green Software book (O’Reilly)
Environment variables (Podcast)
www.greensoftwarebrighton.co.uk
109. 109
The end beginning…
Build amazing technology
(some can help drive sustainability)
Acknowledge our responsibility as software practitioners
Nobody else cares “how” software works, just “that” it works
Only we can hold ourselves and each other accountable
The “how” defines the carbon footprint of digital technologies
151. The ASA enforces the CAP and BCAP Advertising Codes, which
govern media advertising.
These codes include specific sections for environmental claims
and social responsibility, ensuring ads do not mislead about
environmental benefits or other aspects, promoting honest and
responsible advertising.
152. Misleading Advertising
Section 3 of the CAP and BCAP Codes mandates that advertisements must not materially
mislead consumers.
'Material' information—essential for informed decisions—must be accurate and
substantiated by evidence prior to making claims, especially regarding environmental
impact or product attributes, to avoid being misleading.
153. Environmental Advertising
Sections 11 (CAP Code) and 9 (BCAP Code) detail environmental advertising standards,
mandating clarity in environmental claims and the terminology used.
These sections impose stringent requirements for substantiating claims about
environmental impacts, distinguishing between absolute and comparative claims to
prevent misleading advertising.
154.
155.
156.
157. On the EU and rest of the world side, proposals and
laws are in development to tackle misleading
environmental claims more effectively.
162. ● Ensure all environmental claims are
substantiated
● Be honest about how ‘green’ your brand is
● Avoid vague language
● Avoid greenwashed terms
● Don’t rely on offsetting
● Focus on genuine sustainability rather than
marketing
165. Bio
Short for biological. Often used in labels saying ‘bio-based’,
meaning made from living organisms, usually plants.
166. Biodegradable
The product will break down in the natural environment with the
help of bacteria and microbes.
There’s no legal time limit - it can take anywhere from 1 week to
400 years to break down in the environment.
167. Carbon neutral
This doesn’t mean that the product or business does not produce
any emissions.
It means that the company have ‘offset’ their emissions by
investing in projects which supposedly absorb an equal amount of
greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.
168. Climate friendly
This is another way of saying carbon neutral, often meaning the
company has offset their carbon, or reduced their environmental
impact in some way.
169. Compostable
Perhaps the most widely misunderstood claim.
There are two types of compostable: Compostable, Home Compostable
170. Compostable
This means it can be broken down via ‘industrial composting’ which uses a big
machine with lots of organic matter, a high temperature and air flow to compost
items.
It does not mean you can put it on your compost pile in your garden or in your food
bin.
171. Home Compostable
Home compostable - look for the ‘home compostable’ certification logo, this
means it can go in your home compost pile and possibly in your food waste bin (if
your council can accept that type of item).
172.
173. Degradable
It will break down.
Technically most things are degradable, even plastic bags.
There is no legal time limit on how long something can take before companies can
call it degradable.
174. Eco
Short for ecological, but often used to mean environmentally friendly.
There are no rules requiring that companies must show something is beneficial to
the environment to be able to use this term.
175. Environmentally friendly
There are no rules to show that something is beneficial to the
environment, and the term ‘friendly’ has no legal definition either.
176. Green
A buzzword to mean environmentally friendly and good for the
planet but whenever it’s used it’s so vague and has no real
meaning that you should pretty much ignore it.
Always look for evidence behind ‘green’ claims.
177. Net zero
This means an organisation has calculated their emissions and used the process of
reduce, choose renewable, offset, to bring their total emissions to zero.
Some companies are going a step further to try and bring their actual emissions to
zero, meaning they produce absolutely no emissions, but this is almost impossible
unless they produce their own renewable energy on-site.
178.
179. Ocean plastic
Some companies pay for plastic waste that’s been scooped out of the ocean, then
use this in their products.
However, just because something claims to be ‘ocean plastic’ does not mean it has
ever been in the ocean!
Some companies use ‘ocean-bound’ plastic instead which is waste plastic argued
to be destined for the ocean
180. Oxo-degradable
Oxo-degradable plastics are made from standard plastic (from fossil fuels), with
an additive that attracts bacteria to speed up the degrading process.
These items don’t fully disappear, instead they break down into smaller and
smaller pieces, eventually leaving microplastics behind which is a big problem for
our oceans.
181. Plant based
This is popping up more as the popularity, and profitability, of vegan products
rises.
There’s no standard definition, usually it means that it’s based on plants rather
than animal products, but when you see it on a bottle of moisturiser it makes you
wonder why the moisturiser contained animal products before.
182. Plastic free
Plastic free can genuinely be plastic free, sometimes used to promote products
which would not usually be made from plastic or are obviously not made from
plastic, such as ‘plastic-free wooden pegs’.
It can also be used to highlight products that shouldn’t have been made from
plastic in the first place but had hidden plastics many didn't realise existed, such
as ‘plastic-free teabag wrappers’ which we assumed were just paper before.
183. Recycled
Some companies use the word ‘recycled’ but when you read the small print, they’re
made from just 10%or 20% recycled material.
There are two types of recycled content; Pre-consumer Recycled, Post-consumer
Recycled
184. Pre-consumer Recycled
Rubbish that hasn’t been used, usually waste created during manufacturing like
fabric offcuts, plastic pieces, wood shavings etc.
186. Recyclable
A company can prove that their item is recyclable but whether you can recycle it as
a consumer entirely depends on where you are and who is collecting the bin you’re
about to put that ‘recyclable’ product in.
187.
188. Reusable
Technically anything is reusable if you don’t throw it away!
This is used to highlight items that have been designed for reuse, like reusable
coffee cups.
189. Sustainable
Sustainable should consider three elements (social, environmental and
economic), but there’s no requirement to do so before making a claim of being
sustainable.
Some companies will claim their products are sustainable because they’re
reusable or contain recycled content.
190.
191. Thank you.
Where You Can Find Me:
X (Twitter):@__nca
LinkedIn: Natalie Arney
nataliearney.com