CASE STUDY PRESENTATION
            ON
“ad caMPaigN gOT MiLK???”




               PRESENTED BY:
               Sumit kumar maurya
               Surajeet singh
               Vineet singh
INTRODUCTION


 “GOT MILK” One of the popular campaign of the 1990s.

 Initiated by California Milk Processor Board. (CPMB).

 Persons and agency involved were Manning the then newly appointed
   Executive Director of California Milk Processor Board. (CPMB) and
   Goodby, Silverstein & Partners.

 The Dairy industry constituted of the Farmers, Processors and Distributors.

 Marketing brand Vs. Commodities.

 How the campaign made its journey over the period.
Beverages


                                Beverage



                     Water                 Flavoured



         NonAlcoholic                                   Alcoholic



  Milk            Juices                         Wine         Distilled Spirits



     Hot Beverages         Soft Drinks                    Beer
Q.1. What associations do consumers have for milk?
                              Consumer Associations …
     User Imagery                                     Usage Imagery
     -Children                                        -Taken at Home
     -Adults / Teenagers                              - Complements other food types
     -Baby beverage: outside the home


Product-Related Attributes
-Not thirst quenching
                                                                     Brand Personality
-Lack of flavour
                                                                     - Dull & Boring
-Milk is White & Sold in Gallons          MILK




     Functional Benefits                                           History & Heritage
     -Nutritious                                                   -Nostalgia
     -Calcium Rich                                                 -Ritual


                                   Experiential Benefits
                                   Filling Drink                          Harmful
Implications of Associations…

            •Diminishing
            Behavioral Loyalty
            •Less Intense Activity                 •Social Approval
                                                   •Health
                            Resonance
     •Low consideration                            •Dull & Boring
     •Credible
                                                        • Personality
     •Quality                                           mismatch
                       Judgments        Feelings
                                                        • Ritual
•Nutritional drink
                                                        • No PODs
•Reliable
                     Performance         Imagery        • POP’s
•Style Missing                                               •Moderate depth
                                                              •Low breadth
                           Brand Salience

                             Salience
Q:1. What are the implications of these associations in terms of building
       brand equity for and increasing the consumption of milk?
                         Old Marketing Campaign
 “Milk Does a Body Good” Campaign
    Displayed target group drinking milk
    Emphasis on Nutrients and benefits
    Milk was shown without food
    Generated positive attitudes towards milk
             New Marketing Campaign – Building Brand Equity

     Change Consumer Behaviors : Increase Brand Breadth
     Make Consumers think about milk : Refine Brand Image

   Target Market

       Regular / Loyal users of Milk (70%)
       Behavioral Segmentation : When & Where
        consumers drink Milk
       Identify fresh insights of the target consumer
New Marketing Campaign – Building Brand Equity


 Integrated Communication Strategy
    Priming purchases at PoS
        Billboards                 PoP displays
        Bus Stop ads               Got Milk stickers on bananas etc.
        Got Milk checkout dividers

 Media Strategy
   3 ideal times to communicate
       On the way to the store
       In the store
       At home
   Synchronization of TV ads & consumption timings
       Breakfast, late afternoon, late evening
Q:2. Evaluate the CMPB marketing program now and early 90s? What do
you see as its strength & weaknesses ? What changes would you make?

                  Evaluation - Got Milk Campaign

 • 6% increase in no of milk consumers. – Changing consumer behavior

 • 1.07% increase in Sales Volume – Sales Increase

 • Ads - 60% Aided Recall within 3 months – Making Consumers Think about
   Milk

 • Licensing of Got Milk? – National Dairy

 • Advertisement of the Year | Effie Award – 1995
Strengths & Weakness

• Collaborative Marketing
   – Marketing with complementary foods
• Right Target Customers
• Partnership with ad agency
• Extremely creative campaign
• Integrative Marketing
   – Television
   – Billboards
• Memorable and inspiring brand slogan and signature
   – Got Milk? – Iconic Status
• Non Milk drinkers were not targeted (Weakness)
Q.3. Evaluate their Hispanic marketing initiatives. Does the CMPB risk alienating
its current consumer base?


•   An inhabitant of one of the countries of Hispanic America (or Spanish America)
• A person of Hispanic ancestry who is citizen, resident or other in the United States.
• The Ad Campaigns like La Liorona and Licuados, which were solely directed to the
  Hispanic demographic in California gained favor to milk sales from the Hispanic-
  Californians


         • Large Hispanic population
         • Heavy milk drinkers
         • Deprivation concept was not funny for them
         • Sacred ingredient: family, love & milk
         • Campaign was very successful
         • Risk of alienating current consumer base is low (2 different cultures; 2
           different languages)
No CMPB does not risk alienating its current consumer base as
they had already succeeded in creating a strong brand image
and mind share with its current consumer base.
Q.4. There are several areas of growth that lay ahead of the CMPB—
health, cheese, Hispanic, and new channels of distribution. Given the
trends, what should they do and how should they do it?


They need to focus on their future by concentrating on these new directions, like
the Hispanic demographic and their cheese consumption for instance


         Health: trend that should be pursued
         Cheese: an opportunity among Hispanics
         New channels: sources of growth
• Target on Hispanic Population to increase the consumption of Milk.•

• To encourage more dairies to invest in upgrading their plants for the production
  of flavored milk products packaged in plastic containers.

• Launch more number of milk products for every category like flavored for teens,
  demand for the Soy & other variants like organic products would also grow.

• Improved portable packaging and variety of milk flavors naturally led to the
  expansion of milk into vending machines.

• Concentrate on the high schools where the sales of the carbonated drinks have
  been banned, flavored milk can very well replace that.

• Tie with the fast food joints like McDonalds, Burger King would be good
  strategy to adopt
5. How long can the CMPB keep running the “got milk?” campaign? What
can they do to keep the message and strategy fresh in the consumer’s minds?
Are there other examples of other successful campaigns that ran this long?


        • Problems relate to the weaknesses described above
        • Difficult to increase consumption for reasons described above
        • Possible Remedies:
            Expand flavors (Greater variety; Milk becomes less a
               commodity, more a beverage)
            Expand usage occasions (Portability leads to greater usage)
            Push strategy (Milk is highly profitable in retail)
            Expand through other channels (Half of meal occasions
               outside home)

Got milk

Got milk

  • 1.
    CASE STUDY PRESENTATION ON “ad caMPaigN gOT MiLK???” PRESENTED BY: Sumit kumar maurya Surajeet singh Vineet singh
  • 2.
    INTRODUCTION  “GOT MILK”One of the popular campaign of the 1990s.  Initiated by California Milk Processor Board. (CPMB).  Persons and agency involved were Manning the then newly appointed Executive Director of California Milk Processor Board. (CPMB) and Goodby, Silverstein & Partners.  The Dairy industry constituted of the Farmers, Processors and Distributors.  Marketing brand Vs. Commodities.  How the campaign made its journey over the period.
  • 3.
    Beverages Beverage Water Flavoured NonAlcoholic Alcoholic Milk Juices Wine Distilled Spirits Hot Beverages Soft Drinks Beer
  • 4.
    Q.1. What associationsdo consumers have for milk? Consumer Associations … User Imagery Usage Imagery -Children -Taken at Home -Adults / Teenagers - Complements other food types -Baby beverage: outside the home Product-Related Attributes -Not thirst quenching Brand Personality -Lack of flavour - Dull & Boring -Milk is White & Sold in Gallons MILK Functional Benefits History & Heritage -Nutritious -Nostalgia -Calcium Rich -Ritual Experiential Benefits Filling Drink Harmful
  • 5.
    Implications of Associations… •Diminishing Behavioral Loyalty •Less Intense Activity •Social Approval •Health Resonance •Low consideration •Dull & Boring •Credible • Personality •Quality mismatch Judgments Feelings • Ritual •Nutritional drink • No PODs •Reliable Performance Imagery • POP’s •Style Missing •Moderate depth •Low breadth Brand Salience Salience
  • 6.
    Q:1. What arethe implications of these associations in terms of building brand equity for and increasing the consumption of milk? Old Marketing Campaign  “Milk Does a Body Good” Campaign  Displayed target group drinking milk  Emphasis on Nutrients and benefits  Milk was shown without food  Generated positive attitudes towards milk New Marketing Campaign – Building Brand Equity  Change Consumer Behaviors : Increase Brand Breadth  Make Consumers think about milk : Refine Brand Image  Target Market  Regular / Loyal users of Milk (70%)  Behavioral Segmentation : When & Where consumers drink Milk  Identify fresh insights of the target consumer
  • 7.
    New Marketing Campaign– Building Brand Equity  Integrated Communication Strategy  Priming purchases at PoS  Billboards  PoP displays  Bus Stop ads  Got Milk stickers on bananas etc.  Got Milk checkout dividers  Media Strategy  3 ideal times to communicate  On the way to the store  In the store  At home  Synchronization of TV ads & consumption timings  Breakfast, late afternoon, late evening
  • 8.
    Q:2. Evaluate theCMPB marketing program now and early 90s? What do you see as its strength & weaknesses ? What changes would you make? Evaluation - Got Milk Campaign • 6% increase in no of milk consumers. – Changing consumer behavior • 1.07% increase in Sales Volume – Sales Increase • Ads - 60% Aided Recall within 3 months – Making Consumers Think about Milk • Licensing of Got Milk? – National Dairy • Advertisement of the Year | Effie Award – 1995
  • 9.
    Strengths & Weakness •Collaborative Marketing – Marketing with complementary foods • Right Target Customers • Partnership with ad agency • Extremely creative campaign • Integrative Marketing – Television – Billboards • Memorable and inspiring brand slogan and signature – Got Milk? – Iconic Status • Non Milk drinkers were not targeted (Weakness)
  • 10.
    Q.3. Evaluate theirHispanic marketing initiatives. Does the CMPB risk alienating its current consumer base? • An inhabitant of one of the countries of Hispanic America (or Spanish America) • A person of Hispanic ancestry who is citizen, resident or other in the United States. • The Ad Campaigns like La Liorona and Licuados, which were solely directed to the Hispanic demographic in California gained favor to milk sales from the Hispanic- Californians • Large Hispanic population • Heavy milk drinkers • Deprivation concept was not funny for them • Sacred ingredient: family, love & milk • Campaign was very successful • Risk of alienating current consumer base is low (2 different cultures; 2 different languages)
  • 11.
    No CMPB doesnot risk alienating its current consumer base as they had already succeeded in creating a strong brand image and mind share with its current consumer base.
  • 12.
    Q.4. There areseveral areas of growth that lay ahead of the CMPB— health, cheese, Hispanic, and new channels of distribution. Given the trends, what should they do and how should they do it? They need to focus on their future by concentrating on these new directions, like the Hispanic demographic and their cheese consumption for instance Health: trend that should be pursued Cheese: an opportunity among Hispanics New channels: sources of growth
  • 13.
    • Target onHispanic Population to increase the consumption of Milk.• • To encourage more dairies to invest in upgrading their plants for the production of flavored milk products packaged in plastic containers. • Launch more number of milk products for every category like flavored for teens, demand for the Soy & other variants like organic products would also grow. • Improved portable packaging and variety of milk flavors naturally led to the expansion of milk into vending machines. • Concentrate on the high schools where the sales of the carbonated drinks have been banned, flavored milk can very well replace that. • Tie with the fast food joints like McDonalds, Burger King would be good strategy to adopt
  • 14.
    5. How longcan the CMPB keep running the “got milk?” campaign? What can they do to keep the message and strategy fresh in the consumer’s minds? Are there other examples of other successful campaigns that ran this long? • Problems relate to the weaknesses described above • Difficult to increase consumption for reasons described above • Possible Remedies:  Expand flavors (Greater variety; Milk becomes less a commodity, more a beverage)  Expand usage occasions (Portability leads to greater usage)  Push strategy (Milk is highly profitable in retail)  Expand through other channels (Half of meal occasions outside home) 