Gi presentations of non gi disorders how to avoid pitfalls
1.
Title
Speaker
GI presentations ofnon GI
disorders - how to avoid
pitfalls.
Dr Mark Fernandes
B.Sc(Hons), MBChB(Hons), MRCP(UK), FAMS(Gastro)
Gastroenterologist
2.
Learning Objectives
At theconclusion of this CME activity, the learner should be better
able to:
• Have greater knowledge of the GI presentations of systemic
diseases.
• Be able to discuss differential diagnoses for the cases presented
• Be able to list appropriate investigations
• Be able to outline a plan of management
CASE
A 45yr chineseman presented to A&E in March 2020 with a 1 day history of abdominal
pain, vomiting 2x and diarrhoea<6x/day. PMHX: Hypertension on Amlodipine 5mg om.
He was treated with symptomatic relief (Buscopan, Maxolon and loperamide) and told
to return if symptoms did not improve.
He returned to A&E 2 days later because his abdominal pain had gotten
worse and diarrhoea had not resolved. He was admitted for acute GE.
On the ward he developed a fever of 38.5 degrees. Patient was transferred to an
isolation ward.
On further questioning he revealed he did have dry cough.
Additional labs
• MycoplasmaIgM non reactive
• Stool sent for GI Panel PCR – NAD
• Dengue antigen negative and Dengue IgM non reactive
• SARS-COV2 PCR swab sent
• Radiologic imaging done –CXR and CT abdomen
COVID-19
Symptoms
• Most Common
–Fever (83-89%)
– Respiratory (62%), SOB (19-31%)
– Neurologic: Anosmia/dysgeusia
(approx. 50%), Confusion,
ischaemic/haemorrhagic stroke
– CVS: endothelial involvement,
myocardial injury
14.
GI Manifestations
• Beforerespiratory manifestations,
many patients had diarrhoea,
nausea, vomiting and abdominal
discomfort.
• The range reported in various studies
=2-40%
• In Singapore, GI Manifestations have
been reported at 17%
15.
GI Symptoms
Mao Ret al. Manifestations and prognosis of gastrointestinal and liver involvement in patients with COVID-
19: a systematic review and meta-analysis add text. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 5: 667–78
16.
Outcomes
GI symptoms maybe associated with poor clinical outcomes
including:
• Higher risk of mortality.
• More severe disease
• Longer hospital stay
• Use of drugs in hospital including antibiotics
Pan L, Mu M, Ren HG, et al. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients with digestive symptoms in Hubei, China: a descriptive, cross-
sectional multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2020 March 18 Epub
17.
Potential mechanisms ofCOVID-19 in
the GI
• Uses Angiotensin converting
enzyme-2 (ACE2) as a viral
receptor to enter host cells
• These are present throughout
the GI tract and also on
cholangiocytes
• An intriguing finding was a
higher expression of ACE2 in
absorptive enterocytes from
the ileum and colon than the
lung
Gu J, et al. Gastroenterology. 2020;doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.054.
Xiao F, et al. Gastroenterology. 2020;doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.055.
18.
Transmission
• Human-to-human transmissionoccurs
through
– Respiratory secretions droplets
– Aerosols
– Faeces
– Contaminated surfaces
• Transmission through symptomatic and
asymptomatic patients
• Virus viable up to 3 hrs after aerosolisation
• Risk of infection - healthcare workers
account for 29% of all patients in Wuhan
19.
Faecal Oral
Transmission?
• Inabout 50% of COVID-19 cases, the presence of
SARS-CoV-2 in faecal samples and detection of
SARS-CoV-2 in intestinal mucosa of infected
patients suggest that enteric symptoms could be
caused by invasion of ACE2 expressing
enterocytes and the GI tract may be an
alternative route of infection.
• In >50% of patients, faecal samples remained
positive for SARS-CoV2 RNA for a mean of 11 days
after clearance of respiratory tract samples
• A recent study further confirmed that 8 of 10
infected children had persistently positive viral
rectal swabs after nasopharyngeal testing was
negative.
• Importantly, live SARS-CoV-2 was detected on
electron microscopy in stool samples from two
patients who did not have diarrhoea, highlighting
the potential of faecal-oral transmission
20.
Detectable Faecal Virus
CheungKS et al. Gastrointestinal Manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Virus Load in Fecal Samples from the
Hong Kong Cohort and Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2020 Apr 3
21.
Liver Manifestations
Guan W-J,Ni Z-Y, Hu Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of 2019 novel coronavirus infection in China. N Engl J Med 2020; published online Feb 28.
Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020; 395: 497–506.
Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet 2020; 395: 507–13.
Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalised patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA 2020; published online Feb 7.
DOI:10.1001/jama.2020.1585.
Shi H, Han X, Jiang N, et al. Radiological findings from 81 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis 2020; published online Feb 24.
DOI:10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30086-4.
9 Xu X-W, Wu X-X, Jiang X-G, et al. Clinical findings in a group of patients infected with the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2) outside of Wuhan, China: retrospective case series. BMJ
2020; published online Feb 19.
10 Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet
Respir Med 2020; published online Feb 24. DOI:10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30079-5.
22.
Liver
Manifestations
• Liver impairmenthas been reported
in up to 60% of patients with SARS
and also in patients infected with
MERS-CoV.
• Current data indicate that 2–11% of
patients with COVID-19 had liver
comorbidities and 14–53% cases
reported abnormal levels of alanine
aminotransferase and aspartate
aminotransferase (AST) during
disease progression.
23.
COVID-19 and LFTabnormalities
The aetiology of abnormal liver function tests were due to either COVID-19
related hepatitis or drug induced liver injury
Most of the patients had abnormal liver test results within 1-2 ULN at
admission and only a few (<4%) had abnormal liver test results higher than 2
ULN.
Patients also tended to have underlying liver diseases, including NAFLD,
alcoholic liver disease, and chronic Hepatitis B (P<0.001)
• Be awareof asymptomatic carriers and
transmission.
• Be aware of atypical presentations, especially in
the elderly – Eg: GI manifestations, confusion,
functional decline, falls, prothrombotic events.
• Current SASH workflows do not specifically
tackle patients with atypical presentations
• Be aware that Nasal Swab PCR testing has a
sensitivity of only about 70%
Learning Points
about COVID-19
CASE
• 21 yearold women, shop assistant
• No past history of note
• Presented to ED with acute D+V
and was admitted for severe GE and
discharged 5 days later
• Readmitted 1 week later with
persistent D+V and palpitations
• Found to be in SVT in ED, converted
with adenosine
28.
O/E
afebrile, BP 140/80,HR 130, SpO2
96% RA
- alert, dehydrated
- no rash or lymphadenopathy
- heart S1S2 no murmurs
- lungs clear
- abdo soft, generalised tenderness BS
sluggish ++ bladder palpable
- no focal neuro deficits
Radiologic Findings
• asciteswith increased
peritoneal
enhancement
• circumferential,
symmetrical,
multisegmented mural
thickening usually of the
jejunum and ileum with
associated submucosal
oedema (target sign)
32.
Radiologic Findings
• engorgementof
mesenteric vessels with
a palisade pattern or
comb-like appearance
• dilatation of intestinal
segments mesenteric
fat stranding
Updated
SLE
Diagnostic
Criteria
References 1 AringerM,
Costenbader K, Daikh D, et al. 2019
European League against
Rheumatism/ American College of
rheumatology classification criteria
for systemic lupus erythematosus.
Ann Rheum Dis 2019;78:1151–9.
37.
GI
Presentations
• Side effectsof drugs
– GERD, Dysphagia
– Dyspepsia
– Gastric ulcers, GI Bleed
• peritoneum: ascites is found in up to 10% of patients due to serositis
• gastrointestinal vasculature
– vasculitis causing colitis, mucosal ulceration with haemorrhage or
perforation, intestinal ischaemia, "watermelon stomach" or gastric
antral vascular ectasia, oesophageal dysmotility or intestinal
pseudo-obstruction4
– thrombosis of the intestinal vessels may also occur in association
with antiphospholipid syndrome
• mucosa
– mouth ulcers in 50% of patients
– protein-losing enteropathy and fat malabsorption
– associated ulcerative colitis or Crohn disease
• pancreas: pancreatitis
• liver and biliary tract
– hepatomegaly, steatosis, hepatitis, cholestasis, primary biliary
cirrhosis and eventually cirrhosis may be found.
– Budd-Chiari syndrome which may be associated with
antiphospholipid antibodies in SLE
– acalculous cholecystitis and benign biliary stricture
• spleen: splenic infarction
• adrenal glands
– adrenal haemorrhage
– hypoadrenalism
G Bertsias et al. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Pathogenesis and Clinical Features. 2012
GI tract manifestations are
reported in 25-40% of
patients
38.
Learning Points
Perform athorough physical
examination and be on the look out for
dermatological features of SLE.
Have a high index of suspicion if a
patient has multi-system involvement.
CASE
82yr Chinese gentleman
spendshis time between
here and brunei
PMHx – IHD s/p PCI
Meds: Plavix 75mg om
Admitted with 1 day history
of severe abdominal pain
and vomiting
Management
• Patient underwenta laparotomy,
cause of intestinal obstruction
not found.
• Bowel however was still viable
and no resection was performed.
• He was planned for a gastroscopy
and colonoscopy but delayed this
for a few months
Learning
Points
• The twolargest studies of GI lymphoma reported the
following sites of involvement in Greek and German
populations
• Stomach – 68 to 75 percent
• Small bowel (including duodenum) – 25 percent
• Ileo-cecal region – 7 percent
• More than one GI site – 6 to 13 percent
• Rectum – 2 percent
• Diffuse colonic involvement – 1 percent
• Koch P, del Valle F, Berdel WE, et al. Primary gastrointestinal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: I. Anatomic
and histologic distribution, clinical features, and survival data of 371 patients registered in the German
Multicenter Study GIT NHL 01/92. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19:3861
• Papaxoinis G, Papageorgiou S, Rontogianni D, et al. Primary gastrointestinal non-Hodgkin's
lymphoma: a clinicopathologic study of 128 cases in Greece. A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group
study (HeCOG). Leuk Lymphoma 2006; 47:2140.
CASE
• 44yr oldIndian Expat from Bombay living in Sg for
>5years, Investmant banker
• referred by GP
• PMHX
UC dx 1999 in India
goes for scopes every 3 years
colonoscopy in 2000 - polyp - leiomyoma
capsule endoscopy normal
HP negative
iGG4 normal
Hep Bs Ag neg
• FHX
Father/Grandfather - pancreatitis
Mother ulcerative colitis
56.
Colonoscopy Findings
Endoscopic evidenceof inflammation noted with skip lesions affecting
the sigmoid colon and terminal ileum
These findings were consistent with histology
Acute on chronic inflammation
Cryptitis
Crypt distortion
Crypt abscesses
No granulomas seen
AFB smear negative
57.
Differential
Diagnosis
• UC orCrohns?
• Parasitic infection such as
amoeba, giardia,
crytococcocus
• TB
• Malignancy/Lymphoma
58.
Investigations
• Amoebic antibodynegative
• Stool FEME and culture – Neg
• Stool GI Panel PCR - NAD
• Biopsies sent for histological examination
• Sent for AFB smear, TB PCR, AFB culture
• TB PCR Positive
Learning
Points:
Abdominal
tuberculosis is a
greatmimicker
• Extrapulmonary tuberculosis occurs in about 20% of
tuberculosis.
• GI tuberculosis constitutes about 10% of extra-
pulmonary tuberculosis.
• GI tuberculosis (TB) can present with involvement of
any site. Symptoms and signs may include fever, weight
loss, abdominal pain and/or distension, ascites,
hepatomegaly, diarrhea, abdominal mass, and abnormal
liver function tests.
• Risk factors include (history of prior TB infection or
disease, known or possible TB exposure, and/or past or
present residence in or travel to an area where TB is
endemic).
• Spread through ingestion of infected sputum or milk, (2)
through hematogenous or lymphatic spread and finally
(3) through direct spread into the peritoneum from the
fallopian tubes
62.
Learning
Points
• The diagnosisof abdominal TB may
be definitively established by
demonstration
of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in
peritoneal fluid or a biopsy
specimen of an involved site.
• AFB smear, AFB culture, Nucleic
Acid Amplification Test (TB-PCR) are
recommended
• Interferon-gamma response assays
may be helpful but cannot
differentiate between latent and
active TB (TB Quantiferon Gold or T-
Spot tests)
Lewinsohn DM et al. Official American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America/Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention Clinical Practice Guidelines: Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Adults and
Children. Diagnosis of TB in Adults and Children • CID 2017:64 (15 January)
Case
• 29yr oldchinese lady admitted with 4days of
abdominal pain.
• She had already been to EMD once but cont to
have persistent pain and was admitted.
Progress
• On the4th day of admission around I saw her
in the morning and she was clinically well.
• At 7pm I was notified that the patient was
extremely breathless.
Management
• Diagnosis: DiabeticKetoacidosis
• Transferred to MICU
• Started on IV Insulin
• IV Bicarbonate
• Aggressive fluid rehydration
• Correction of electrolytes
• Patient discharged and currently on insulin