I just uploaded #Geopolitics How the world has been run' to @academia! https://www.academia.edu/41737556/Geopolitics_How_the_world_has_been_run

1. 1
1

2. 2
2
Geopolitics

3. 3
3
How the
world has
been run
Agha H Amin
ISBN-13: 978-1973878230
ISBN-10: 1973878232
Mazen@csio-ops.com

4. 4
4

5. 5
5

6. 6
6

7. 7
7

8. 8
8

9. 9
9

10. 10
10

11. 11
11

12. 12
12

13. 13
13

14. 14
14

15. 15
15

16. 16
16

17. 17
17

18. 18
18

19. 19
19

20. 20
20

21. 21
21

22. 22
22

23. 23
23

24. 24
24

25. 25
25

26. 26
26

27. 27
27

28. 28
28

29. 29
29

30. 30
30

31. 31
31

32. 32
32

33. 33
33

34. 34
34

35. 35
35

36. 36
36

37. 37
37

38. 38
38

39. 39
39

40. 40
40

41. 41
41

42. 42
42

43. 43
43

44. 44
44

45. 45
45

46. 46
46

47. 47
47

48. 48
48

49. 49
49
Pakistans Military usurper
General Zia

50. 50
50

51. 51
51

52. 52
52

53. 53
53

54. 54
54

55. 55
55

56. 56
56

57. 57
57

58. 58
58

59. 59
59

60. 60
60

61. 61
61

62. 62
62

63. 63
63

64. 64
64

65. 65
65

66. 66
66

67. 67
67

68. 68
68
IRAQ STRATEGIC FAILURE
OF USA

69. 69
69

70. 70
70
AFGHANISTAN FAILURE OF
USA
Introduction
This work is a brief
examination of United
States of America’s

71. 71
71
strategic and operational
military failure in
Afghanistan.
We maintain that US failure
in Afghanistan was not
inevitable by any definition
, but US military failure
occurred because of
“ tangible” , “precise” , “
avoidable” political and
military failures.
FIRST STRATEGIC
FAILURE

72. 72
72

73. 73
73
STRATEGIC FAILURE NUMBER ONE
FAILURE TO ADDRESS PAKISTANI
STRATEGIC FEARS AND
APPREHENSIONS ABOUT US
PRESENCE IN AFGHANISTAN
US politically failed to address
Pakistani strategic fears and
apprehensions about US mission in
Afghanistan.

74. 74
74
Pakistans General Musharraf feared
being cracked like a nut between a
US and Indian set of pincers and
outwardly claimed that he was a US

75. 75
75
ally while secretly supporting
Taliban.
If Pakistani fears had been
addressed and generous US financial
and material incentives offered US
could have saved far more than the
losses that it later suffered in
Afghanistan.
Ambassador Chamberlain was
particularly a major failure. So was
the US DIA and CIA staff in Pakistan.

76. 76
76
STRATEGIC FAILURE NUMBER TWO-
FAILURE TO SECURE THE
SOUTHERN BORDER AND TO
CONTROL TALIBAN INFILTRATION
FROM PAKISTAN

77. 77
77
A simple combined with a 1000
metres deep surveilled by drones and
covered by a mobile divisional size
force could have most effectively

78. 78
78
checked Taliban infiltration.This was
however not done.Possible reasons
can be lack of strategic vision but as
per reports from US military sources
desire not to disturb the
contraband/drug smuggling mafia
which was seen as a US asset.

79. 79
79

80. 80
80

81. 81
81
STRATEGIC FAILURE NUMBER
THREE-FAILURE TO ATTACK KEY
TALIBAN BASES IN PAKISTAN

82. 82
82
STRATEGIC FAILURE NUMBER
FOUR-FAILURE TO DESTROY DRUG
MAFIA WHICH CONSTITUTED MAIN
TALIBAN SOURCE OF REVENUE

83. 83
83

84. 84
84
STRATEGIC FAILURE NUMBER FIVE
FAILURE TO PRESSURISE PAKISTAN
TO THE EXTENT THAT IT
ABANDONED SUPPORTING TALIBAN

85. 85
85
STRATEGIC FAILURE NUMBER SIX
FAILURE TO CREATE A CLASS WITH
A VESTED INTEREST IN US VICTORY
IN THE SOUTH
A Border trade zone on both sides of
Af Pak Border would have created a
class of people who had a vested
interest in US victory .
The US politicians failed to push
through legislation to create Border
Trade Zones in the congress.

86. 86
86

87. 87
87

88. 88
88

89. 89
89

90. 90
90

91. 91
91

92. 92
92