SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
Download to read offline
General Relativity and Gravitation, Vol. 34, No. 3, March 2002 ( c 2002)




LETTER

Generation of Solutions of the Einstein Equations by
Means of the Kaluza–Klein Formulation


G. F. Torres del Castillo 1 and V. Cuesta-S´ nchez2
                                           a
              Received July 31, 2001


              It is shown that starting from a solution of the Einstein–Maxwell equations coupled to
              a scalar field given by the Kaluza–Klein theory, invariant under a one-parameter group,
              one can obtain a one-parameter family of solutions of the same equations.

              KEY WORDS: Kaluza–Klein formulation; generation of solutions.




In the Kaluza–Klein theory one considers a five-dimensional Riemannian man-
ifold with a metric tensor d s 2 = gAB dx A dx B (A, B, . . . = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4) of
                              ˆ      ˆ
                                                          ˆ
signature (+ − − − −), or equivalent, whose Ricci tensor, RAB , vanishes. The met-
ric gAB admits a “spacelike” Killing vector field K = K A ∂/∂x A which induces
    ˆ
a 4 + 1 decomposition of the metric gAB , analogous to the 3 + 1 decomposition
                                      ˆ
of a stationary spacetime (see, e.g., Ref. 1). In a coordinate system such that
K = ∂/∂x 4 the metric d s 2 can be written as
                        ˆ
                      d s 2 = gαβ dx α dx β −
                        ˆ                            2
                                                         (dx 4 + κAα dx α )2 ,                          (1)

 1 Departamento de F´sica Matem´ tica, Instituto de Ciencias de la Universidad Aut´ noma de Puebla,
                      ı          a                                                o
   Apartado postal 1152, 72001 Puebla, Pue., M´ xico. E-mail: gtorres@fcfm.buap.mx
                                                e
 2 Facultad de Ciencias F´sico Matem´ ticas, Universidad Aut´ noma de Puebla, Apartado postal 1152,
                         ı          a                       o
   72001 Puebla, Pue., M´ xico.
                          e

                                               435

                                                0001–7701/02/0300-0435/0 c 2002 Plenum Publishing Corporation
436                                                     Torres del Castillo and Cuesta-S´ nchez
                                                                                        a


where the Greek lower case indices α, β, . . ., run from 0 to 3, 2 = −g44 > 0,
                                                                       ˆ
                                                                      ˆ
κ is a constant and ∂ gAB /∂x 4 = 0. Then one finds that the equations RAB = 0
                      ˆ
are equivalent to (see, e.g., Ref. 2)

                    Gαβ = 2 κ 2
                          1           2
                                          Fαγ Fβ γ − 4 gαβ Fγ δ F γ δ
                                                     1

                                 −1                            γ
                           −          (    α   β   − gαβ   γ        ),                     (2)
                                  αβ               −1          αβ
                             αF           = −3      ( α )F ,                               (3)
                                  γ
                             γ             = − 4 κ 2 3 Fαβ F αβ ,
                                               1
                                                                                           (4)

where Gαβ is the Einstein tensor of the four-dimensional metric gαβ , Fαβ =
∂α Aβ −∂β Aα , and α is the covariant derivative compatible with gαβ . In particular,
when = constant, eqs. (2) and (3) are the usual Einstein–Maxwell equations
and eq. (4) imposes the condition Fαβ F αβ = 0.
     Thus, if one starts with a spacetime metric gαβ and fields Aα and , defined
on that spacetime, which satisfy eqs. (2)–(4), then the five-dimensional metric (1)
              ˆ
is Ricci flat, RAB = 0.
     Following Ref. 3 we shall assume that the five-dimensional metric d s 2 admits
                                                                           ˆ
a second Killing vector field L = LA ∂/∂x A , that commutes with K. In a
coordinate system such that K = ∂/∂x 4 , these conditions amount to ∂LA /∂x 4 =
0 and

                        Lα ∂α = 0,                                                         (5)
                        Lβ ∂β Aα + Aβ ∂α Lβ = −κ −1 ∂α L4 ,                                (6)
                        Lγ ∂γ gαβ + 2gγ α ∂β Lγ = 0.                                       (7)

Equation (6), in turn, is locally equivalent to the vanishing of the Lie derivative
of Fαβ with respect to Lα ∂α . Conversely, if Lα ∂α is a Killing vector field of the
four-dimensional metric gαβ and the Lie derivatives of Fαβ and with respect to
Lα ∂α also vanish then, defining L4 by means of eq. (6), it follows that LA ∂/∂x A
is a Killing vector field of gAB that commutes with K = ∂/∂x 4 .
                               ˆ
       If a, b are two real constants such that aK+bL is “spacelike” (i.e., gAB (aK A +
                                                                            ˆ
bLA )(aK B + bLB ) < 0), then aK + bL induces another 4 + 1 decomposition of
d s 2 of the form (1), with some fields gαβ , Aα , and
  ˆ                                                       that also obey eqs. (2)–(4).
Thus, by decomposing a given Ricci flat five-dimensional space in two different
ways, making use of two different “spacelike” Killing vector fields, one obtains
two possibly different solutions of eqs. (2)–(4).
       According to the preceding discussion, starting from a solution of eqs. (2)–(4)
such that the Lie derivatives of gαβ , Fαβ and with respect to some vector field
Lα ∂α vanish (e.g., a stationary solution of the Einstein vacuum field equations,
with Fαβ = 0 and = constant), eq. (6) yields a function L4 (x α ), defined up
Generation of Solutions of Einstein Equations by Means of Kaluza–Klein Formulation          437


to an additive constant, in such a manner that LA ∂/∂x A (as well as ∂/∂x 4 ) is a
Killing vector field of the five-dimensional metric (1). Then, for any choice of the
                                     A           B
real constants a, b such that gAB (aδ4 +bLA )(aδ4 +bLB ) < 0, the Killing vector
                              ˆ
field a∂/∂x  4 + bLA ∂/∂x A induces a 4 + 1 decomposition of g   ˆ AB of the form (1),
which gives another solution, gαβ , Aα , , of eqs. (2)–(4) (that also possesses a
vector field with respect to which the Lie derivatives of gαβ , Fαβ , and     vanish).
The new solution thus obtained only depends on the ratio of the constants a, b.
      As a simple example we shall start from the Schwarzschild solution with
Aα = 0 and = 1, which give a solution of eqs. (2)–(4); letting x 4 = w, the
corresponding five-dimensional metric is
                                         −1
                 2M                2M
ds2 = 1 −
 ˆ                    dt 2 − 1 −              dr 2 −r 2 dθ 2 −r 2 sin2 θ dφ 2 −dw2 . (8)
                  r                 r

Choosing Lα ∂α = ∂t , which satisfies eqs. (5)–(7) with, for instance, L4 = 0, it
follows that LA ∂/∂x A = ∂t is a Killing vector field of d s 2 , as can be seen directly
                                                          ˆ
from eq. (8). Taking, for instance, a = b = 1, ∂w + ∂t is a “spacelike” Killing
vector field of (8) and by means of the coordinate transformation w = w − t ,
t = t + w one finds that ∂w + ∂t = ∂w and the metric (8) takes the form
                                                  −1
                  r                2M
     ds2 = 4
      ˆ             − 1 dt 2 − 1 −                     dr 2 − r 2 dθ 2 − r 2 sin2 θ dφ 2
                 2M                 r
                 2M          r                2
             −      dw + 1 −   dt
                  r          M
therefore,
                                                       −1
                       r               2M
gαβ dx α dx β = 4        −1 dt 2 − 1 −                      dr 2 − r 2 dθ 2 − r 2 sin2 θ dφ 2 ,
                      2M                r
                                      r                              2M
                  κAα dx α = 1 −        dt ,                 2
                                                                 =      ,
                                      M                               r
is a new solution of eqs. (2)–(4), which is stationary and spherically symmetric as
the seed solution.
      As pointed out above, a Killing vector field of the four-dimensional metric
gαβ that also leaves Fαβ and invariant gives rise to a Killing vector field of gAB
                                                                                ˆ
that commutes with ∂/∂x 4 . These “lifted” Killing vector fields form a Lie algebra
that is a central extension of the Lie algebra of four-dimensional vector fields that
leave gαβ , Fαβ , and invariant (the proof is essentially that given in Ref. 4).
      The condition imposed on the seed solution in the generating method pre-
sented here is similar to that imposed in the method given in Ref. 1; but in the
method considered here the only differential condition that has to be integrated is
438                                                 Torres del Castillo and Cuesta-S´ nchez
                                                                                    a


eq. (6) for L4 . Furthermore, the Killing vector field Lα ∂α of the seed solution may
be null since it is only necessary that the Killing vector field (aK A + bLA )∂/∂x A
of the five-dimensional metric gAB be spacelike. A similar procedure to that
                                    ˆ
developed here is applicable to the generalizations of the Kaluza–Klein theory
with more extra dimensions.

REFERENCES

1. Geroch, R. P. (1971). J. Math. Phys. 12, 918.
2. Wesson, P. S. (1999). Space, Time, Matter: Modern Kaluza–Klein Theory (World Scientific,
   Singapore).
3. Torres del Castillo, G. F. and Flores-Amado, A. (2000). Gen. Rel. Grav. 32, 2159.
4. Torres del Castillo, G. F. and Mercado-P´ rez, J. (1999). J. Math. Phys. 40, 2882.
                                            e

More Related Content

What's hot

Module 12 Matrices
Module 12   MatricesModule 12   Matrices
Module 12 Matricesguestcc333c
 
Kittel c. introduction to solid state physics 8 th edition - solution manual
Kittel c.  introduction to solid state physics 8 th edition - solution manualKittel c.  introduction to solid state physics 8 th edition - solution manual
Kittel c. introduction to solid state physics 8 th edition - solution manualamnahnura
 
Computer Science and Information Science 3rd semester (2011-July) Question Pa...
Computer Science and Information Science 3rd semester (2011-July) Question Pa...Computer Science and Information Science 3rd semester (2011-July) Question Pa...
Computer Science and Information Science 3rd semester (2011-July) Question Pa...B G S Institute of Technolgy
 
Form 4 formulae and note
Form 4 formulae and noteForm 4 formulae and note
Form 4 formulae and notesmktsj2
 
Conformable Chebyshev differential equation of first kind
Conformable Chebyshev differential equation of first kindConformable Chebyshev differential equation of first kind
Conformable Chebyshev differential equation of first kindIJECEIAES
 
New Families of Odd Harmonious Graphs
New Families of Odd Harmonious GraphsNew Families of Odd Harmonious Graphs
New Families of Odd Harmonious GraphsIJMIT JOURNAL
 
P1 Variation Modul
P1 Variation ModulP1 Variation Modul
P1 Variation Modulguest3952880
 
P1 Variations Test
P1 Variations TestP1 Variations Test
P1 Variations Testguest3952880
 
P1 Variation Modul 2
P1 Variation Modul 2P1 Variation Modul 2
P1 Variation Modul 2guest3952880
 
Module 15 Algebraic Formulae
Module 15   Algebraic FormulaeModule 15   Algebraic Formulae
Module 15 Algebraic Formulaenorazilah
 
Module 11 Tansformation
Module 11  TansformationModule 11  Tansformation
Module 11 Tansformationguestcc333c
 
A transference result of Lp continuity from the Jacobi Riesz transform to the...
A transference result of Lp continuity from the Jacobi Riesz transform to the...A transference result of Lp continuity from the Jacobi Riesz transform to the...
A transference result of Lp continuity from the Jacobi Riesz transform to the...Wilfredo Urbina
 
Ysu conference presentation alaverdyan
Ysu conference  presentation alaverdyanYsu conference  presentation alaverdyan
Ysu conference presentation alaverdyanGrigor Alaverdyan
 

What's hot (19)

Module 12 Matrices
Module 12   MatricesModule 12   Matrices
Module 12 Matrices
 
Kittel c. introduction to solid state physics 8 th edition - solution manual
Kittel c.  introduction to solid state physics 8 th edition - solution manualKittel c.  introduction to solid state physics 8 th edition - solution manual
Kittel c. introduction to solid state physics 8 th edition - solution manual
 
Computer Science and Information Science 3rd semester (2011-July) Question Pa...
Computer Science and Information Science 3rd semester (2011-July) Question Pa...Computer Science and Information Science 3rd semester (2011-July) Question Pa...
Computer Science and Information Science 3rd semester (2011-July) Question Pa...
 
Form 4 formulae and note
Form 4 formulae and noteForm 4 formulae and note
Form 4 formulae and note
 
mathematics formulas
mathematics formulasmathematics formulas
mathematics formulas
 
1114 ch 11 day 14
1114 ch 11 day 141114 ch 11 day 14
1114 ch 11 day 14
 
Maths model%20 qp
Maths model%20 qpMaths model%20 qp
Maths model%20 qp
 
Module 5 Sets
Module 5 SetsModule 5 Sets
Module 5 Sets
 
Conformable Chebyshev differential equation of first kind
Conformable Chebyshev differential equation of first kindConformable Chebyshev differential equation of first kind
Conformable Chebyshev differential equation of first kind
 
New Families of Odd Harmonious Graphs
New Families of Odd Harmonious GraphsNew Families of Odd Harmonious Graphs
New Families of Odd Harmonious Graphs
 
2 homework
2 homework2 homework
2 homework
 
P1 Variation Modul
P1 Variation ModulP1 Variation Modul
P1 Variation Modul
 
P1 Variations Test
P1 Variations TestP1 Variations Test
P1 Variations Test
 
P1 Variation Modul 2
P1 Variation Modul 2P1 Variation Modul 2
P1 Variation Modul 2
 
Module 15 Algebraic Formulae
Module 15   Algebraic FormulaeModule 15   Algebraic Formulae
Module 15 Algebraic Formulae
 
Module 11 Tansformation
Module 11  TansformationModule 11  Tansformation
Module 11 Tansformation
 
A transference result of Lp continuity from the Jacobi Riesz transform to the...
A transference result of Lp continuity from the Jacobi Riesz transform to the...A transference result of Lp continuity from the Jacobi Riesz transform to the...
A transference result of Lp continuity from the Jacobi Riesz transform to the...
 
Relation and function_xii
Relation and function_xiiRelation and function_xii
Relation and function_xii
 
Ysu conference presentation alaverdyan
Ysu conference  presentation alaverdyanYsu conference  presentation alaverdyan
Ysu conference presentation alaverdyan
 

Viewers also liked

Propositional Logic, Boolean Arithmetic And Binary Arithmetic
Propositional Logic, Boolean Arithmetic And Binary ArithmeticPropositional Logic, Boolean Arithmetic And Binary Arithmetic
Propositional Logic, Boolean Arithmetic And Binary Arithmeticguest9fa195
 
Poster Partial And Complete Observables
Poster Partial And Complete ObservablesPoster Partial And Complete Observables
Poster Partial And Complete Observablesguest9fa195
 
Monoids, Computer Science And Evolution
Monoids, Computer Science And EvolutionMonoids, Computer Science And Evolution
Monoids, Computer Science And Evolutionguest9fa195
 
Gauge Systems With Noncommutative Phase Space
Gauge Systems With Noncommutative Phase SpaceGauge Systems With Noncommutative Phase Space
Gauge Systems With Noncommutative Phase Spaceguest9fa195
 
Conformal Anisotropic Mechanics And Horavas Particle
Conformal Anisotropic Mechanics And Horavas ParticleConformal Anisotropic Mechanics And Horavas Particle
Conformal Anisotropic Mechanics And Horavas Particleguest9fa195
 
Propositional Logic, Boolean Arithmetic And Binary Arithmetic
Propositional Logic, Boolean Arithmetic And Binary ArithmeticPropositional Logic, Boolean Arithmetic And Binary Arithmetic
Propositional Logic, Boolean Arithmetic And Binary Arithmeticvcuesta
 

Viewers also liked (6)

Propositional Logic, Boolean Arithmetic And Binary Arithmetic
Propositional Logic, Boolean Arithmetic And Binary ArithmeticPropositional Logic, Boolean Arithmetic And Binary Arithmetic
Propositional Logic, Boolean Arithmetic And Binary Arithmetic
 
Poster Partial And Complete Observables
Poster Partial And Complete ObservablesPoster Partial And Complete Observables
Poster Partial And Complete Observables
 
Monoids, Computer Science And Evolution
Monoids, Computer Science And EvolutionMonoids, Computer Science And Evolution
Monoids, Computer Science And Evolution
 
Gauge Systems With Noncommutative Phase Space
Gauge Systems With Noncommutative Phase SpaceGauge Systems With Noncommutative Phase Space
Gauge Systems With Noncommutative Phase Space
 
Conformal Anisotropic Mechanics And Horavas Particle
Conformal Anisotropic Mechanics And Horavas ParticleConformal Anisotropic Mechanics And Horavas Particle
Conformal Anisotropic Mechanics And Horavas Particle
 
Propositional Logic, Boolean Arithmetic And Binary Arithmetic
Propositional Logic, Boolean Arithmetic And Binary ArithmeticPropositional Logic, Boolean Arithmetic And Binary Arithmetic
Propositional Logic, Boolean Arithmetic And Binary Arithmetic
 

Similar to Generation Of Solutions Of The Einstein Equations By Means Of The Kaluza Klein Formulation

Change of variables in double integrals
Change of variables in double integralsChange of variables in double integrals
Change of variables in double integralsTarun Gehlot
 
Change of variables in double integrals
Change of variables in double integralsChange of variables in double integrals
Change of variables in double integralsTarun Gehlot
 
transplantation-isospectral-poster
transplantation-isospectral-postertransplantation-isospectral-poster
transplantation-isospectral-posterFeynman Liang
 
Solution of ps02 cmth03apr13
Solution of ps02 cmth03apr13Solution of ps02 cmth03apr13
Solution of ps02 cmth03apr13Prakash Dabhi
 
D. Vulcanov - On Cosmologies with non-Minimally Coupled Scalar Field and the ...
D. Vulcanov - On Cosmologies with non-Minimally Coupled Scalar Field and the ...D. Vulcanov - On Cosmologies with non-Minimally Coupled Scalar Field and the ...
D. Vulcanov - On Cosmologies with non-Minimally Coupled Scalar Field and the ...SEENET-MTP
 
Local Volatility 1
Local Volatility 1Local Volatility 1
Local Volatility 1Ilya Gikhman
 
Stability criterion of periodic oscillations in a (9)
Stability criterion of periodic oscillations in a (9)Stability criterion of periodic oscillations in a (9)
Stability criterion of periodic oscillations in a (9)Alexander Decker
 
Lesson 16: Implicit Differentiation
Lesson 16: Implicit DifferentiationLesson 16: Implicit Differentiation
Lesson 16: Implicit DifferentiationMatthew Leingang
 
Note on Character Theory-summer 2013
Note on Character Theory-summer 2013Note on Character Theory-summer 2013
Note on Character Theory-summer 2013Fan Huang (Wright)
 
SMB_2012_HR_VAN_ST-last version
SMB_2012_HR_VAN_ST-last versionSMB_2012_HR_VAN_ST-last version
SMB_2012_HR_VAN_ST-last versionLilyana Vankova
 
Group theory notes
Group theory notesGroup theory notes
Group theory notesmkumaresan
 
Inmo 2010 problems and solutions
Inmo 2010 problems and solutionsInmo 2010 problems and solutions
Inmo 2010 problems and solutionsaskiitians
 

Similar to Generation Of Solutions Of The Einstein Equations By Means Of The Kaluza Klein Formulation (20)

Thesis 6
Thesis 6Thesis 6
Thesis 6
 
Change of variables in double integrals
Change of variables in double integralsChange of variables in double integrals
Change of variables in double integrals
 
Change of variables in double integrals
Change of variables in double integralsChange of variables in double integrals
Change of variables in double integrals
 
transplantation-isospectral-poster
transplantation-isospectral-postertransplantation-isospectral-poster
transplantation-isospectral-poster
 
Solution of ps02 cmth03apr13
Solution of ps02 cmth03apr13Solution of ps02 cmth03apr13
Solution of ps02 cmth03apr13
 
Maths04
Maths04Maths04
Maths04
 
D. Vulcanov - On Cosmologies with non-Minimally Coupled Scalar Field and the ...
D. Vulcanov - On Cosmologies with non-Minimally Coupled Scalar Field and the ...D. Vulcanov - On Cosmologies with non-Minimally Coupled Scalar Field and the ...
D. Vulcanov - On Cosmologies with non-Minimally Coupled Scalar Field and the ...
 
Chern-Simons Theory
Chern-Simons TheoryChern-Simons Theory
Chern-Simons Theory
 
Local Volatility 1
Local Volatility 1Local Volatility 1
Local Volatility 1
 
Stability criterion of periodic oscillations in a (9)
Stability criterion of periodic oscillations in a (9)Stability criterion of periodic oscillations in a (9)
Stability criterion of periodic oscillations in a (9)
 
Lesson 16: Implicit Differentiation
Lesson 16: Implicit DifferentiationLesson 16: Implicit Differentiation
Lesson 16: Implicit Differentiation
 
Note on Character Theory-summer 2013
Note on Character Theory-summer 2013Note on Character Theory-summer 2013
Note on Character Theory-summer 2013
 
SMB_2012_HR_VAN_ST-last version
SMB_2012_HR_VAN_ST-last versionSMB_2012_HR_VAN_ST-last version
SMB_2012_HR_VAN_ST-last version
 
Thesis
ThesisThesis
Thesis
 
Group theory notes
Group theory notesGroup theory notes
Group theory notes
 
Monopole zurich
Monopole zurichMonopole zurich
Monopole zurich
 
Calculus Homework Help
Calculus Homework HelpCalculus Homework Help
Calculus Homework Help
 
Directional derivative and gradient
Directional derivative and gradientDirectional derivative and gradient
Directional derivative and gradient
 
Legendre
LegendreLegendre
Legendre
 
Inmo 2010 problems and solutions
Inmo 2010 problems and solutionsInmo 2010 problems and solutions
Inmo 2010 problems and solutions
 

Generation Of Solutions Of The Einstein Equations By Means Of The Kaluza Klein Formulation

  • 1. General Relativity and Gravitation, Vol. 34, No. 3, March 2002 ( c 2002) LETTER Generation of Solutions of the Einstein Equations by Means of the Kaluza–Klein Formulation G. F. Torres del Castillo 1 and V. Cuesta-S´ nchez2 a Received July 31, 2001 It is shown that starting from a solution of the Einstein–Maxwell equations coupled to a scalar field given by the Kaluza–Klein theory, invariant under a one-parameter group, one can obtain a one-parameter family of solutions of the same equations. KEY WORDS: Kaluza–Klein formulation; generation of solutions. In the Kaluza–Klein theory one considers a five-dimensional Riemannian man- ifold with a metric tensor d s 2 = gAB dx A dx B (A, B, . . . = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4) of ˆ ˆ ˆ signature (+ − − − −), or equivalent, whose Ricci tensor, RAB , vanishes. The met- ric gAB admits a “spacelike” Killing vector field K = K A ∂/∂x A which induces ˆ a 4 + 1 decomposition of the metric gAB , analogous to the 3 + 1 decomposition ˆ of a stationary spacetime (see, e.g., Ref. 1). In a coordinate system such that K = ∂/∂x 4 the metric d s 2 can be written as ˆ d s 2 = gαβ dx α dx β − ˆ 2 (dx 4 + κAα dx α )2 , (1) 1 Departamento de F´sica Matem´ tica, Instituto de Ciencias de la Universidad Aut´ noma de Puebla, ı a o Apartado postal 1152, 72001 Puebla, Pue., M´ xico. E-mail: gtorres@fcfm.buap.mx e 2 Facultad de Ciencias F´sico Matem´ ticas, Universidad Aut´ noma de Puebla, Apartado postal 1152, ı a o 72001 Puebla, Pue., M´ xico. e 435 0001–7701/02/0300-0435/0 c 2002 Plenum Publishing Corporation
  • 2. 436 Torres del Castillo and Cuesta-S´ nchez a where the Greek lower case indices α, β, . . ., run from 0 to 3, 2 = −g44 > 0, ˆ ˆ κ is a constant and ∂ gAB /∂x 4 = 0. Then one finds that the equations RAB = 0 ˆ are equivalent to (see, e.g., Ref. 2) Gαβ = 2 κ 2 1 2 Fαγ Fβ γ − 4 gαβ Fγ δ F γ δ 1 −1 γ − ( α β − gαβ γ ), (2) αβ −1 αβ αF = −3 ( α )F , (3) γ γ = − 4 κ 2 3 Fαβ F αβ , 1 (4) where Gαβ is the Einstein tensor of the four-dimensional metric gαβ , Fαβ = ∂α Aβ −∂β Aα , and α is the covariant derivative compatible with gαβ . In particular, when = constant, eqs. (2) and (3) are the usual Einstein–Maxwell equations and eq. (4) imposes the condition Fαβ F αβ = 0. Thus, if one starts with a spacetime metric gαβ and fields Aα and , defined on that spacetime, which satisfy eqs. (2)–(4), then the five-dimensional metric (1) ˆ is Ricci flat, RAB = 0. Following Ref. 3 we shall assume that the five-dimensional metric d s 2 admits ˆ a second Killing vector field L = LA ∂/∂x A , that commutes with K. In a coordinate system such that K = ∂/∂x 4 , these conditions amount to ∂LA /∂x 4 = 0 and Lα ∂α = 0, (5) Lβ ∂β Aα + Aβ ∂α Lβ = −κ −1 ∂α L4 , (6) Lγ ∂γ gαβ + 2gγ α ∂β Lγ = 0. (7) Equation (6), in turn, is locally equivalent to the vanishing of the Lie derivative of Fαβ with respect to Lα ∂α . Conversely, if Lα ∂α is a Killing vector field of the four-dimensional metric gαβ and the Lie derivatives of Fαβ and with respect to Lα ∂α also vanish then, defining L4 by means of eq. (6), it follows that LA ∂/∂x A is a Killing vector field of gAB that commutes with K = ∂/∂x 4 . ˆ If a, b are two real constants such that aK+bL is “spacelike” (i.e., gAB (aK A + ˆ bLA )(aK B + bLB ) < 0), then aK + bL induces another 4 + 1 decomposition of d s 2 of the form (1), with some fields gαβ , Aα , and ˆ that also obey eqs. (2)–(4). Thus, by decomposing a given Ricci flat five-dimensional space in two different ways, making use of two different “spacelike” Killing vector fields, one obtains two possibly different solutions of eqs. (2)–(4). According to the preceding discussion, starting from a solution of eqs. (2)–(4) such that the Lie derivatives of gαβ , Fαβ and with respect to some vector field Lα ∂α vanish (e.g., a stationary solution of the Einstein vacuum field equations, with Fαβ = 0 and = constant), eq. (6) yields a function L4 (x α ), defined up
  • 3. Generation of Solutions of Einstein Equations by Means of Kaluza–Klein Formulation 437 to an additive constant, in such a manner that LA ∂/∂x A (as well as ∂/∂x 4 ) is a Killing vector field of the five-dimensional metric (1). Then, for any choice of the A B real constants a, b such that gAB (aδ4 +bLA )(aδ4 +bLB ) < 0, the Killing vector ˆ field a∂/∂x 4 + bLA ∂/∂x A induces a 4 + 1 decomposition of g ˆ AB of the form (1), which gives another solution, gαβ , Aα , , of eqs. (2)–(4) (that also possesses a vector field with respect to which the Lie derivatives of gαβ , Fαβ , and vanish). The new solution thus obtained only depends on the ratio of the constants a, b. As a simple example we shall start from the Schwarzschild solution with Aα = 0 and = 1, which give a solution of eqs. (2)–(4); letting x 4 = w, the corresponding five-dimensional metric is −1 2M 2M ds2 = 1 − ˆ dt 2 − 1 − dr 2 −r 2 dθ 2 −r 2 sin2 θ dφ 2 −dw2 . (8) r r Choosing Lα ∂α = ∂t , which satisfies eqs. (5)–(7) with, for instance, L4 = 0, it follows that LA ∂/∂x A = ∂t is a Killing vector field of d s 2 , as can be seen directly ˆ from eq. (8). Taking, for instance, a = b = 1, ∂w + ∂t is a “spacelike” Killing vector field of (8) and by means of the coordinate transformation w = w − t , t = t + w one finds that ∂w + ∂t = ∂w and the metric (8) takes the form −1 r 2M ds2 = 4 ˆ − 1 dt 2 − 1 − dr 2 − r 2 dθ 2 − r 2 sin2 θ dφ 2 2M r 2M r 2 − dw + 1 − dt r M therefore, −1 r 2M gαβ dx α dx β = 4 −1 dt 2 − 1 − dr 2 − r 2 dθ 2 − r 2 sin2 θ dφ 2 , 2M r r 2M κAα dx α = 1 − dt , 2 = , M r is a new solution of eqs. (2)–(4), which is stationary and spherically symmetric as the seed solution. As pointed out above, a Killing vector field of the four-dimensional metric gαβ that also leaves Fαβ and invariant gives rise to a Killing vector field of gAB ˆ that commutes with ∂/∂x 4 . These “lifted” Killing vector fields form a Lie algebra that is a central extension of the Lie algebra of four-dimensional vector fields that leave gαβ , Fαβ , and invariant (the proof is essentially that given in Ref. 4). The condition imposed on the seed solution in the generating method pre- sented here is similar to that imposed in the method given in Ref. 1; but in the method considered here the only differential condition that has to be integrated is
  • 4. 438 Torres del Castillo and Cuesta-S´ nchez a eq. (6) for L4 . Furthermore, the Killing vector field Lα ∂α of the seed solution may be null since it is only necessary that the Killing vector field (aK A + bLA )∂/∂x A of the five-dimensional metric gAB be spacelike. A similar procedure to that ˆ developed here is applicable to the generalizations of the Kaluza–Klein theory with more extra dimensions. REFERENCES 1. Geroch, R. P. (1971). J. Math. Phys. 12, 918. 2. Wesson, P. S. (1999). Space, Time, Matter: Modern Kaluza–Klein Theory (World Scientific, Singapore). 3. Torres del Castillo, G. F. and Flores-Amado, A. (2000). Gen. Rel. Grav. 32, 2159. 4. Torres del Castillo, G. F. and Mercado-P´ rez, J. (1999). J. Math. Phys. 40, 2882. e