Gen. Info. On Taxes Budget And Performance Mar 2009
1. Garnet Valley School District
Information About Property Taxes, Budget, and Performance
Table of Contents: Page
What is a "Mill" & "PTRI" 1
Mill and Tax Rates Comparison to Dela. Co., Table 2
Four Year Comparative Tax Increase, Chart 3
Total Mills by Year, County Average & GVSD, Chart 4
Assessments, How They Are Done, & Composition 5
Act 1, Rent Rebate, & General Fund Budget Process 6
General Fund Budget Process, (Continued) 7
Summary Budget, Cost per Student ,& Expense Budget Pie Chart 8
Cost per Student Comparison to Other Districts & Tuition History 9
Cost per Student, Chart 10
Local, State, & Federal Funding 1986 to 2009, Chart 11
Special Education & Cost per Remedial Special Ed. Student 12
GVSD and Other Dela. Co. Districts DCIU Spending Table.
(Note: it costs Less to Do Most Special Instruction In-House) 13
Staffing & State Pension System Contribution Rate Tables 14
Enrollment History & Projection Table 15
GVSD PSSA Test Rankings in Dela. Co. 2006 & 2003 Table.
Also includes cost per Student per Scored Performance Point 16
Charts Showing “Bang for the Buck” in Regards to the Cost
per Student Performance Point 17
2. Garnet Valley School District
What is a Mill?
Mills: The standard unit of measure for property taxes is the mill. (1 / 1000 = 1 mill; one
tenth of one percent; or, .001). If the property tax levy is 26.0 mills (.026), then a
property assessed at $100,000 would incur tax of $2,600.00 ($100,000 / 1000 x 26.0 ), or
($100,000 x .026).
Value of a Mill: A taxpayer with an assessment of $200,000 pays an additional $200 of
tax if the millage rate is increased by one mill ($200,000 x .001). If the current millage
rate is 26 mills and it is increased by one mill, the tax rate increase is 4% (1 / 26). For
fiscal year 2008 - 2009, that same one mill rate increase would generate an additional
$2,257,664 of total tax revenue to the district. The district’s actual tax rate for 2008-2009
is 26.079 mills. Using the current tax rate, the district will realize total tax revenues of
$58,876,807, which is the amount of budgeted tax revenue in the general fund this year.
We call this the value of one mill to the taxpayer and to the district respectively.
PTRI: The Property Tax Reduction Index (PTRI) was first enacted by the State for the
2006-2007 fiscal school year as part of Act 72. Essentially the index creates a ceiling that
limits how much a district can raise taxes in a fiscal year. The index is now published
each October under provisions of Act 1, and the “unenhanced” index for 2009-2010 is
4.1%. Some districts (not Garnet Valley) are allowed an “enhanced index” because they
cannot generate substantial revenues due to their lower tax assessment bases.
GVSD PTRI
GVSD Percent Index
F/Y Mills Change (Max.)
05/06 23.527
06/07 24.445 3.90% 3.90%
07/08 25.270 3.37% 3.40%
08/09 26.079 3.20% 4.40%
09/10 TBD* TBD %* 4.10%
Garnet Valley School District (GVSD) complied, voluntarily, with the base, unenhanced,
PTRI index in 2006-2007. Since then, the district has been within the base index limit (no
enhancements or exceptions) each year. The district has never sought to use any of the
state allowed exceptions to the index limit that are available to any qualifying school
district.
* TBD: To Be Determined
1
4. Four Year Tax Rate % Incr
WS
30.00% Rid
Spfld
Cumulative 4 Year Tax Incr %
25.00% Hav
Rad
20.00%
SED
15.00% Chi
UD
10.00%
WP
5.00% RTM
PD
0.00% GV
av
ad
TM
hi
N
id
V
ED
ld
D
D
U
t
MN
S
P
In
G
M
R
C
U
C
-5.00% P
pf
W
W
H
R
R
S
S
Int
School District
CU
3
5. Total Mills by Year
26.2500
25.2500
County Average
M ills
24.2500 Garnet Valley
23.2500
22.2500
0405 0506 0607 0708 0809
Year
4
6. Assessments
Delaware County establishes property assessment values, not school districts. Delaware County
was totally re-assessed in 2000. At that time, the assessed value of property was set equal to the
then existing estimated market value.
The assessed value of your property remains unchanged from year to year unless the property
significantly changes value. Significant property valuation changes can include permanent
impairments arising, (for example), from fire, flood, or demolition, or increases in valuation
arising from the construction of building additions or renovations.
Each year, the State determines an updated “common level” ratio (CLR) that indicates the
difference between assessed values and current market values for properties sold within each
county. The current ratio in Delaware County is now 58.3% vs. 100% back in 2000, which
indicates a widening ratio of about 6.1% per year on average. For example, a property with a
market value of $200,000 back in 2000 in Delaware County could be worth $350,000 today,
assuming normal maintenance, but that property continues to be assessed at $200,000.
Unlike other states, Pennsylvania taxpayers are not subject to annual assessment adjustments
based upon cost of living changes. Also unlike other states, when you buy an existing home in
Pennsylvania, the assessment is not adjusted based upon the sale price.
If a taxpayer believes his property is over-assessed, he has the right to appeal that assessment
annually. For properties more than two years old, the basis for that appeal could include a
current appraisal, and a survey of the valuations of other, similar properties. For properties less
than two years old, the taxpayer can reference his purchase price, the current CLR, and other
similar sales as part of his appeal.
Garnet ValleyTaxable Assessment Composition, Per County
Taxables Count # Assmnt $ Count # Assmnt $
Type 2008 2008 2007 2007
Residential 8306 $1,744,287,290 8023 $1,669,740,143
Commercial 240 $455,326,759 232 $367,950,282
Farm 0 $0 0 $0
Industrial 9 $13,601,862 10 $18,201,862
Ground 914 $54,714,571 1125 $65,943,043
Totals 9469 $2,267,930,482 9390 $2,121,835,330
Large Assessments and Percent of Taxables
Assessments > $1M, July 1: Assessment Count:
0809 - 18.5% of total tax base $422,201,356 74
0708 - 17% of total tax base $374,239,568 69
0607 - 16% of total tax base $335,550,312 69
0506 - 17% of total tax base $332,764,473 66
0405 - 17% of total tax base $318,453,217 63
5
7. Act 1 of 2006 Homestead Property Tax Rebates
From Share of Slot Machine Tax Revenue
By May 1 each year, the Pennsylvania Department of Education notifies each district their share of
property tax reduction funding, if any. A taxpayer must have an approved homestead to receive a share of
the slot tax revenue proceeds; and, every approved homestead gets the same dollar amount of tax relief.
This tax relief appears as a credit reduction on the July 1 school tax bill (you don’t get a check).
In FY 08-09, an approved GVSD homestead received $221 of tax relief, based upon 6,638 qualified
homesteads and a homestead assessment exclusion amount of $8,477. Eighty percent of the district’s total
residential properties participate in the homestead tax relief program
The State reimburses GVSD 50% of its estimated share of slot revenues at the end of August and it pays
the other 50% to GVSD at the end of October.
Senior Citizen Property Tax / Rent Rebate Relief
To qualify for this separate, state program, the taxpayer or renter must have income of less than $35,000
annually, which includes wages, business income, pensions, annuities, IRA distributions interest, dividend
rental and capital gain income, lottery winnings, alimony, disability income, inheritances, life insurance
benefits, gifts, as well as half of any social security benefits.
The claimant or spouse must be 65 or older; widows / widowers 50 and over also qualify, as do disabled
aged 18 or over. The relief ranges from $300 to $650, based on income. Form Pa 1000 is available
annually after Feb 15th and normally must be filed by June 30th
(extended to December 29, 2008 this year).
General Fund Budget Process
Following Act 1 of 2006, most school districts must now adopt a preliminary budget 90 days prior to the
spring primary election (May 19 – 90 days = Feb 18, 2009; Jan 23, 2008 last year) unless they resolve by
resolution (by Feb 18 this year; Jan 23 last year), not to exceed the PTRI. If districts resolve not to exceed
the index, they can follow the old budget development timelines (adopt a proposed final budget at least 30
days prior to the final budget adoption; and, adopt the final budget by June 30th). It’s important to
observe that based upon when the primary election occurs, the mandated budget timelines can shift by as
much as three weeks.
One implication of Act 1 is that a new School Board could be sworn in by the first week in December,
and less than a month later that new Board could be adopting a preliminary budget for the following year,
with little time to review how that budget was constructed.
If a district decided to adopt its preliminary budget in late January or February, that budget must be
developed based upon estimated tax assessments, since the actual tax duplicate is not delivered to the
district from the county until late January, and since all tax base growth between Jan – June would have to
be estimated. The result is that these districts must budget their estimated property tax revenue much
more conservatively than in previous years, before Act 1, when tax assessment base and growth data was
known.
6
8. If you read in the newspapers that districts are adopting preliminary budgets in January or February, that
early budget adoption indicates that those districts are contemplating increasing their property tax millage
rate beyond their PTRI index, either by means of claiming tax exceptions, by voter referendum approval,
or both.
The Garnet Valley School Board decided this past January not to exceed the PTRI index (maximum tax
increase ceiling of 4.1%), so the district is allowed to follow the traditional budget development timeline
and does not need to adopt a preliminary budget in January or February. That resolution obligates the
district not to seek any referendum exceptions to increase its proposed tax rate beyond its PTRI cap.
Garnet Valley’s current millage rate for FY 08-09 is 26.079 mills. The district is now bound by its
Board’s recent tax resolution to a maximum tax rate for 09-10 of 27.148 mills or less.
7
9. Summary Budget and Cost Per Student
Budget Budget Budget Budget
Description 2008 - 2009 2007 - 2008 2006 - 2007 2005 - 2006
Total Expenditure Budget: $78,470,972 $72,731,666 $65,423,440 $58,710,581
Less: Offsetting Program Revenues (If program revenue did not occur; prorgam cost would be cut):
Total offsetting revenue ($5,044,052) ($4,764,692) ($3,933,861) ($3,304,562)
Budget, net of offsetting revenue $73,426,920 $67,966,974 $61,489,579 $55,406,019
Projected students 4,759 4,711 4,588 4,378
Cost per student, gross $16,489 $15,439 $14,260 $13,410
Cost per student, net $15,429 $14,427 $13,402 $12,656
0708 Expense Budget
0% 16%
0%
Wa ge s
7% B e ne f it s
P urc h S v c
8% 50% S upplie s
E quip
F e e s D ue s
D e bt
19%
8
10. Comparative Cost Per Student Cost/ Stdnts Budget
In Delaware County Stdnt 0708 0708 Rank
Chester Upland $20,272 4,445 $90,107,828 1
Radnor $19,236 3,609 $69,424,152 2
Rose Tree Media $18,144 4,000 $72,574,902 3
Marple Newtown $16,412 3,534 $58,000,000 4
Springfield $15,534 3,400 $52,814,552 5
Wallingford-Swarthmore $15,444 3,550 $54,826,200 6
Garnet Valley $15,439 4,711 $72,731,666 7
Chichester $14,913 3,770 $56,220,715 8
Haverford $14,415 5,506 $79,369,445 9
Penn-Delco $14,076 3,332 $46,900,000 10
William Penn $13,600 5,750 $78,198,497 11
Interboro $13,480 3,833 $51,668,140 12
Southeast Delco $13,324 4,134 $55,083,376 13
Ridley $13,000 5,900 $76,697,901 14
Upper Darby $10,832 12,500 $135,401,397 15
Delco SD Tuition History 0708
Elem. Second.
District Tuition Rank Tuition Rank
Radnor $13,278 1 Radnor $13,440 1
Rose Tree Media $12,830 2 Rose Tree Media $11,884 2
Marple Newtown $11,973 3 Wallingford-Swarthmore $11,843 3
Springfield $10,864 4 Marple Newtown $11,778 4
Chichester $10,716 5 Garnet Valley $11,353 5
Southeast Delco $10,119 6 Springfield $10,238 6
Wallingford-Swarthmore $10,008 7 Chichester $9,923 7
Haverford $9,996 8 William Penn $9,596 8
Garnet Valley $9,912 9 Ridley $9,521 9
Ridley $9,769 10 Haverford $9,245 10
Interboro $9,586 11 Penn-Delco $9,175 11
Penn-Delco $9,172 12 Interboro $8,843 12
Chester Upland $8,778 13 Upper Darby $7,909 13
William Penn $8,665 14 Chester Upland $7,289 14
Upper Darby $7,810 15 Southeast Delco $6,654 15
County Average $10,232 County Average $9,913
Garnet Valley does not accept tuition students, but tuition cost is reported by each district and represents the per
student instructional cost net of debt service and transportation.
9
11. Cost Per Student
$22,000
$20,000
$18,000
Cost Ea $16,000
$14,000
$12,000
$10,000
CU MN GV PD SED
District
10
13. Special Education
On September 19, 2005, Judge Eduardo Robreno of the Eastern District Court of Pennsylvania granted the motion
for final approval of the Settlement Agreement in Gaskin v. PA. This ended over ten years of litigation regarding
the education of students with disabilities.
The goal of the settlement is to ensure that Individualized Education Program (IEP) teams consider the regular
classroom with supplementary aids and services before considering a more restrictive placement.
Under the Settlement Agreement, the Pennsylvania Department of Education is responsible for undertaking a
series of activities, including: formation of an advisory panel, Least Restrictive Environment monitoring, training
and technical assistance, and a mini-grant program to support the development and expansion of inclusive
practices. In addition, materials that make it clear that all children are welcome will be developed for display in
public schools.
GVSD Cost Per Remedial Special Education Student
Budget Budget Budget Budget
Description 08/09 07/08 06/07 05/06
Payroll & benefits $7,994,422 $6,913,367 $5,673,732 $5,097,180
All other costs $1,120,163 $993,039 $840,663 $842,316
Gross Spec. Ed. Cost $9,114,585 $7,906,406 $6,514,395 $5,939,496
Offsetting Revenues:
IDEA Revenue ($751,062) ($697,400) ($766,654) ($706,705)
Special Ed Revenue ($1,496,756) ($1,436,076) ($1,408,531) ($1,376,792)
ACCESS Revenue ($660,122) ($660,122) ($340,122) ($120,500)
Net Spec. Ed. Cost $6,206,645 $5,112,808 $3,999,088 $3,735,499
Spec. Ed. Students:
Remedial 1,005 1,001 966 833
Gifted 400 393 402 365
Total 1,405 1,394 1,368 1,198
Net Cost Per Remedial Spec. Ed. Student
Payroll and benefits per stdnt. $5,061 $4,116 $3,270 $3,473
All other costs per stdnt. $1,115 $992 $870 $1,011
Total $6,176 $5,108 $4,140 $4,484
Percent of Students in Special Education Programs
Total GVSD Students 4,759 4,711 4,588 4,378
Pct. in Spec. Ed. Programs 29.5% 29.6% 29.8% 27.4%
12
14. Although the average cost for a remedial special education student this year in GVSD is about $6,176, special education costs can exceed
$60,000 per student for some students with exceptional needs.
Countywide DCIU Contract Special Ed Costs
District 0809 0708 0607 0506
Southeast Delco 1 $2,434,485 $2,099,815 $1,588,456 $1,602,623
Chester Upland 2 $1,873,284 $1,928,300 $1,669,542 $1,932,300
Upper Darby 3 $1,859,461 $1,701,262 $2,038,661 $2,453,215
Interboro 4 $1,538,017 $1,664,986 $1,262,691 $1,131,154
Chichester 5 $1,444,920 $1,398,291 $1,579,401 $1,597,685
Haverford 6 $1,390,227 $1,677,060 $1,704,727 $1,059,081
Ridley 7 $1,284,467 $1,189,940 $1,149,202 $885,090
Rose Tree Media 8 $1,150,332 $1,278,472 $1,441,257 $1,377,692
Wall / Swarth 9 $1,058,623 $1,052,185 $1,115,559 $1,234,115
Penn Delco 10 $1,017,812 $1,126,915 $996,392 $872,937
William Penn 11 $922,549 $1,295,197 $1,961,833 $1,962,397
Marple Newtown 12 $737,624 $798,297 $1,125,753 $996,103
Radnor 13 $697,550 $781,990 $671,569 $848,463
Springfield 14 $397,796 $426,850 $369,116 $324,431
Garnet Valley 15 $360,236 $300,171 $199,863 $289,106
13
15. Staffing 0809 0708
Admininstrators 19 19
Administrative support 31 31
Transportation 65 64
Maintenance 46 45
Paraprofessionals 234 213
Secretaries 33 32
Teachers 405 390
Totals 833 794
Costs Costs
New Teacher Staffing Cost 0809 0708
Salary $40,664 $39,652
Fica, Retire, Life, Disabilty, WC $3,219 $3,139
Medical, etc. $15,735 $14,794
Total Costs $59,618 $57,585
State Pension System (PSERS)
All regular staff are required by law to make mandatory payroll withholding payments into the state teacher’s
retirement system (PSERS). Staff hired after July 22, 1983 are required to pay 7.5% of their regular wages into
PSERS. Staff hired prior to that date pay either 7.5%, or 6.5%, based upon a one- time, personal election.
PSERS is also funded by both the district and the state. A summary of those contribution rates follows:
Total District Total District
F/Y Rate Share F/Y Rate Share
0102 1.09% 0.55% 0910 4.78% 2.39%
0203 1.15% 0.58% 1112 4.75% 2.38%
0304 3.77% 1.89% 1213 16.40% 8.20%
0405 4.23% 2.12% 1314 16.06% 8.03%
0506 4.69% 2.35% 1415 14.87% 7.44%
0607 6.46% 3.23% 1516 14.59% 7.30%
0708 7.13% 3.57% 1617 14.34% 7.17%
0809 4.76% 2.38% 1718 14.05% 7.03%
The employer contribution rate is expected to spike significantly in FY 1213. The district is building reserves and
creating millage to help fund that future increase without adversely affecting property tax millage rates. Since the
state will also need to pay for that rate spike, legislators and consultants are currently reviewing ways to help
finance that increase.
14
16. Enrollment
Year K-2 3-5 6-8 9 - 12 Total
1996-97 575 570 549 495 2,363
1997-98 682 656 600 545 2,697
1998-99 742 741 678 587 2,953
1999-00 807 822 731 612 3,224
2000-01 873 885 807 669 3,480
2001-02 854 962 866 700 3,667
2002-03 859 1,011 925 758 3,823
2003-04 897 1,006 993 791 3,983
2004-05 949 1,021 1,039 854 4,214
2005-06 998 1,032 1,101 938 4,396
2006-07 1,060 1,061 1,121 991 4,613
2007-08 1,059 1,080 1,115 1,082 4,713
2008-09 1,048 1,142 1,108 1,080 4,750
Projection: based on housing starts
2009-10 1,069 1,158 1,115 1,112 4,836
2010-11 1,095 1,158 1,148 1,128 4,895
2011-12 1,085 1,163 1,199 1,120 4,946
2012-13 1,085 1,183 1,215 1,127 4,999
2013-14 1,085 1,209 1,215 1,134 5,042
The average class size at the elementary program level is maintained in the range of eighteen to twenty students
per regular class-room teacher. At the secondary program level, the class size is permitted to increase to the mid-
twenties. Advanced placement and enrichment classes are offered based upon minimum participation thresholds.
15
17. Perform Perform Cost Per Cost Per Cost Per Cost Per
Cost per Student Performance Point (PSSA) Points Points Stdnt Stdnt Qual Pt Qual Pt
2006 2003 FY0506 FY0203 FY0506 FY0203
Radnor 168.1 172.4 $17,225 $17,134 $102 $99
Garnet Valley 163.1 147.0 $13,410 $11,530 $82 $78
Rose Tree Media 152.3 145.9 $16,554 $13,721 $109 $94
Wallingford-Swarthmore 149.2 145.4 $14,404 $12,514 $97 $86
Marple Newtown 144.9 129.8 $15,209 $13,056 $105 $101
Springfield 133.5 132.8 $13,364 $11,595 $100 $87
Haverford 133.0 137.5 $12,417 $10,607 $93 $77
Ridley 126.9 101.6 $11,561 $9,088 $91 $89
Penn-Delco 117.1 120.8 $12,878 $11,175 $110 $93
Interboro 115.8 107.0 $12,145 $10,451 $105 $98
Chichester 90.4 84.3 $12,959 $11,013 $143 $131
Upper Darby 89.5 97.9 $9,692 $8,516 $108 $87
Southeast Delco 80.0 63.2 $11,255 $9,346 $141 $148
William Penn 53.1 52.4 $12,632 $10,276 $238 $196
Chester Upland 27.1 19.3 $18,299 $10,262 $675 $532
County average 116.3 110.5 $13,053 $10,789 $112 $98
Performance Ranking Methodology
Student scores rated advanced or proficient for grade 11 in math and reading were combined,
totaled and ranked for years 2003 and 2006.
16
18. FY 0203 Cost Per Point FY 0506 Cost Per Point
H G
G av ar
ne
ar er
$150
$300
$450
$600
$0
ne fo tV
t V rd al
$0
$150
$300
$450
$600
al le $750
le
y H idR y
W av le
- er y
fo
Sp Up S r
rin Da Sp W d
gf r rin -
ie
l gf S
i
Pe R d R eld
nn idl
D ey In adn
R el te or
os co rb
e o
M ro
17
In Tre ar
te e
rb U ple
o R pD
R ro o
ad
n Pe se T ar
M or nn re
C ar D e
hi p
School District
ch le SE elc
School District
SE este C D o
hi el
r ch co
Cost Per Student Perfomance Point
W De Cost Per Student Perfomance Point
W est
m lco m er
C Pen C Pen
he n he n
s- s-
U U
pl pl