With the Scottish referendum only months away, this seminar focussed on current issues being debated in Scotland and the UK more broadly.
Experts from ESRC's Future of the UK and Scotland programme highlighted the latest evidence on a range of topics including EU membership, defence, public and business attitudes, and Scotland's relationship with the rest of the UK.
Session themes were:
The current state of the debate
What business thinks
Scottish independence: what the public thinks
Scotland and the rest of the UK
Organised by the Economic and Social Research Council and the UK Research Office
Tuesday 11 February 2014, Brussels
The Scottish Government is holding a referendum on 18 September 2014 asking “Should Scotland be an independent country?”
The UK’s Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) has initiated a Future of the UK and Scotland programme of activities bringing the best of UK social science to the debate about Scotland’s constitutional future and its implications for the rest of the UK and Europe. This work aims to both inform the debate in the run-up to the referendum and assist in planning across a wide range of areas which will be affected by the outcome of the vote – whether for Scottish independence or continued Union.
This meeting offered an overview of the programme of work and focused on the key areas of migration and business, on questions about Scotland and the UK’s future membership of the EU as the Scottish referendum – and potentially a UK referendum on EU membership – approach.
Should we forget about ‘the older consumer’? An expert roundtable on market s...ILC- UK
In an ageing society, understanding and engaging with ‘the older consumer’ is of pressing interest for businesses who want to realise the potential of the market. But it is not an easy market to understand or describe.
A key issue to be addressed by marketers is to avoid a homogenisation of older people. The diversity of consumer spending of this group is often lost in ageist perceptions of ‘what older people want’. Despite this however, it remains to be seen if the commonalities of ageing – such as wealth depletion and physiological changes – nudge older people to gravitate to a norm.
In Dec 2010, ILC-UK and the Personal Finance Resource Centre (PFRC) at the University of Bristol published a report which explored what and how older people spent their income (Consumption Patterns Among Older Consumers). The evidence from this report fed into the ILC-UK report for Age UK on older consumers (The Golden Economy).
ILC-UK and PFRC have teamed up again to further explore issues around consumption and old age, funded by the Economic and Social Research Council Secondary Data Analysis Initiative. At this seminar we presented new evidence which explores patterns of expenditure among older people and considers what explains these.
During the seminar we:
Considered how our spending varies as we age, including setting out average and overall spending by age group;
Segmented older households based on their patterns of expenditure;
Considered the validity of a single ‘older consumer’ model.
This was the final event in the Population Patterns Seminar Series which explored the “silver separators”- divorce later in life.
Figures from the Office for National Statistics published in 2012 showed a huge rise in the divorce rate amongst those in their 60s, with an increase of 58% on the 2011 figure. The last 10 years have seen more and more older people part ways, despite divorce amongst the general population becoming less common. This has happened to such an extent that the over 60’s are now the fastest growing divorce group in the UK.
A variety of reasons have been suggested, including a reduction in the stigma surrounding divorce and couples no longer feeling obliged to stay together if their attitudes and needs change.
However, figures released by the ONS in June 2012 revealed that marriages involving older people were also rising faster than for other age groups – up by 21% for women and by 25% for men in their late sixties. Re-partnership is likely to be even higher than these figures suggest, as older people in a new relationship may not choose to remarry.
During the event the discussion explored a number of themes, including:
What factors have contributed to the rising rate of divorce amongst the over 60s?
How can older people’s relationships be better supported?
What challenges does ageing present to relationships?
How do care responsibilities effect relationships?
What are the potential ramifications of older couples separating?
Debt and problem debt among older people 4june13 - presentationILC- UK
Debt is commonly assumed to be a problem of the young and not of the old. New research carried out by ILC-UK and supported by Age UK examines the validity of this assumption and sets out the extent to which debt impacts on the lives of older people.
Over recent years, older people, in common with other age groups, have faced significant financial challenges. For older people, lower than expected returns on savings and decreases in annuity rates have reduced the income many retirees were expecting in later life. Increases in energy and food costs are also hitting older people on fixed incomes hard, while older workers are faced with unprecedented job and income insecurity. Could these new challenges have influenced the attitudes and behaviours of older people towards credit usage? And just how accurate are cosy depictions of older people as ‘squirreling savers shunning credit’ compared to the reality?
This new research explores the way in which attitudes towards borrowing vary by age before presenting new findings on levels of problem debt among older people. The characteristics associated with entering problem debt are explored in this research, as well as the outcomes of living with problem debt on the lives of older people.
Dr Dylan Kneale, Head of Research at ILC-UK, presented the findings of the research. Dr Stella Creasy MP, known for her parliamentary work around the field of debt, was a keynote speaker, while Sally West, Income and Poverty Strategy Adviser at Age UK, provided insight into the organisation’s work in providing debt counselling and advice for older people. Tom Wright, Chief Executive of Age UK, and Baroness Sally Greengross, Chief executive of ILC-UK, co-chaired the event and all took part in a panel debate after presentations.
Throughout 2014, ILC-UK, supported by specialist insurance company, Partnership Assurance Group plc, is undertaking a series of events to explore the relationship between our changing demography and public policy.
The fourth event in this 'Population Patterns Seminar Series' considered the findings of our ‘Factpack’ of UK demographic statistics.
We all know that people are living longer but how is that likely to change our society? How will pensions be affected? How will we care for our growing older society when the traditional “working age” population is shrinking?
These types of debates are increasingly being played out in the media and in political circles but in order for such debates to be productive, they have to be well informed.
ILC-UK believes its 2014 ‘Factpack’ will support this process by highlighting the most recent evidence of our rapidly ageing society. Not only does it provide statistics on a range of critical topics from life expectancy to housing supply; and pensions to long-term care, it also includes a special focus on the current and potential future state of pensioner poverty.
The event was chaired by Baroness Sally Greengross (ILC-UK) with a welcome from Steve Haberman (Dean of the Cass Business School). We were delighted that Gregg McClymont MP, Shadow Minister (Work and Pensions), spoke at at the launch event. We also heard presentations from Professor Les Mayhew (Professor of Statistics, Cass Business School), Steve Groves (Chief Executive of Partnership), Ben Franklin (Research Fellow at ILC-UK) and a response from Tom Younger of the Department for Work and Pensions.
During the discussion we explored:
How the UK’s demography has changed since the release of the 2013 Factpack and how it might change in the future,
How demographic change is reshaping our society,
The challenge of pensioner poverty,
Regional variations in the experiences of older people,
How policy makers should respond to these findings.
Agenda
16:00 - 16:30 Registration
16:30 - 16:35 Welcome by Chair, Baroness Sally Greengross (ILC-UK)
16:35 - 16:40 Welcome by the Dean of Cass Business School, Professor Stete Habberman
16:40 - 16:50 Presentation from Richard Willets (Partnership)
16:50 - 17:10 Presentation from Gregg McClymont MP (Shadow Minister for Work and Pensions)
17:10 - 17:20 Presentation from Ben Franklin (ILC-UK)
17:20 - 17:30 Presentation from Professor Les Mayhew (Cass Business School) Presentation
17:30 - 17:35 Response from Tom Younger (Department for Work and Pensions)
17:35 - 18:25 Discussion/Q&A
18:25 - 18:30 Close by Chair, Baroness Sally Greengross (ILC-UK)
18:30 - 19:15 Drinks reception
Organised by the Economic and Social Research Council and the UK Research Office
Tuesday 11 February 2014, Brussels
The Scottish Government is holding a referendum on 18 September 2014 asking “Should Scotland be an independent country?”
The UK’s Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) has initiated a Future of the UK and Scotland programme of activities bringing the best of UK social science to the debate about Scotland’s constitutional future and its implications for the rest of the UK and Europe. This work aims to both inform the debate in the run-up to the referendum and assist in planning across a wide range of areas which will be affected by the outcome of the vote – whether for Scottish independence or continued Union.
This meeting offered an overview of the programme of work and focused on the key areas of migration and business, on questions about Scotland and the UK’s future membership of the EU as the Scottish referendum – and potentially a UK referendum on EU membership – approach.
Should we forget about ‘the older consumer’? An expert roundtable on market s...ILC- UK
In an ageing society, understanding and engaging with ‘the older consumer’ is of pressing interest for businesses who want to realise the potential of the market. But it is not an easy market to understand or describe.
A key issue to be addressed by marketers is to avoid a homogenisation of older people. The diversity of consumer spending of this group is often lost in ageist perceptions of ‘what older people want’. Despite this however, it remains to be seen if the commonalities of ageing – such as wealth depletion and physiological changes – nudge older people to gravitate to a norm.
In Dec 2010, ILC-UK and the Personal Finance Resource Centre (PFRC) at the University of Bristol published a report which explored what and how older people spent their income (Consumption Patterns Among Older Consumers). The evidence from this report fed into the ILC-UK report for Age UK on older consumers (The Golden Economy).
ILC-UK and PFRC have teamed up again to further explore issues around consumption and old age, funded by the Economic and Social Research Council Secondary Data Analysis Initiative. At this seminar we presented new evidence which explores patterns of expenditure among older people and considers what explains these.
During the seminar we:
Considered how our spending varies as we age, including setting out average and overall spending by age group;
Segmented older households based on their patterns of expenditure;
Considered the validity of a single ‘older consumer’ model.
This was the final event in the Population Patterns Seminar Series which explored the “silver separators”- divorce later in life.
Figures from the Office for National Statistics published in 2012 showed a huge rise in the divorce rate amongst those in their 60s, with an increase of 58% on the 2011 figure. The last 10 years have seen more and more older people part ways, despite divorce amongst the general population becoming less common. This has happened to such an extent that the over 60’s are now the fastest growing divorce group in the UK.
A variety of reasons have been suggested, including a reduction in the stigma surrounding divorce and couples no longer feeling obliged to stay together if their attitudes and needs change.
However, figures released by the ONS in June 2012 revealed that marriages involving older people were also rising faster than for other age groups – up by 21% for women and by 25% for men in their late sixties. Re-partnership is likely to be even higher than these figures suggest, as older people in a new relationship may not choose to remarry.
During the event the discussion explored a number of themes, including:
What factors have contributed to the rising rate of divorce amongst the over 60s?
How can older people’s relationships be better supported?
What challenges does ageing present to relationships?
How do care responsibilities effect relationships?
What are the potential ramifications of older couples separating?
Debt and problem debt among older people 4june13 - presentationILC- UK
Debt is commonly assumed to be a problem of the young and not of the old. New research carried out by ILC-UK and supported by Age UK examines the validity of this assumption and sets out the extent to which debt impacts on the lives of older people.
Over recent years, older people, in common with other age groups, have faced significant financial challenges. For older people, lower than expected returns on savings and decreases in annuity rates have reduced the income many retirees were expecting in later life. Increases in energy and food costs are also hitting older people on fixed incomes hard, while older workers are faced with unprecedented job and income insecurity. Could these new challenges have influenced the attitudes and behaviours of older people towards credit usage? And just how accurate are cosy depictions of older people as ‘squirreling savers shunning credit’ compared to the reality?
This new research explores the way in which attitudes towards borrowing vary by age before presenting new findings on levels of problem debt among older people. The characteristics associated with entering problem debt are explored in this research, as well as the outcomes of living with problem debt on the lives of older people.
Dr Dylan Kneale, Head of Research at ILC-UK, presented the findings of the research. Dr Stella Creasy MP, known for her parliamentary work around the field of debt, was a keynote speaker, while Sally West, Income and Poverty Strategy Adviser at Age UK, provided insight into the organisation’s work in providing debt counselling and advice for older people. Tom Wright, Chief Executive of Age UK, and Baroness Sally Greengross, Chief executive of ILC-UK, co-chaired the event and all took part in a panel debate after presentations.
Throughout 2014, ILC-UK, supported by specialist insurance company, Partnership Assurance Group plc, is undertaking a series of events to explore the relationship between our changing demography and public policy.
The fourth event in this 'Population Patterns Seminar Series' considered the findings of our ‘Factpack’ of UK demographic statistics.
We all know that people are living longer but how is that likely to change our society? How will pensions be affected? How will we care for our growing older society when the traditional “working age” population is shrinking?
These types of debates are increasingly being played out in the media and in political circles but in order for such debates to be productive, they have to be well informed.
ILC-UK believes its 2014 ‘Factpack’ will support this process by highlighting the most recent evidence of our rapidly ageing society. Not only does it provide statistics on a range of critical topics from life expectancy to housing supply; and pensions to long-term care, it also includes a special focus on the current and potential future state of pensioner poverty.
The event was chaired by Baroness Sally Greengross (ILC-UK) with a welcome from Steve Haberman (Dean of the Cass Business School). We were delighted that Gregg McClymont MP, Shadow Minister (Work and Pensions), spoke at at the launch event. We also heard presentations from Professor Les Mayhew (Professor of Statistics, Cass Business School), Steve Groves (Chief Executive of Partnership), Ben Franklin (Research Fellow at ILC-UK) and a response from Tom Younger of the Department for Work and Pensions.
During the discussion we explored:
How the UK’s demography has changed since the release of the 2013 Factpack and how it might change in the future,
How demographic change is reshaping our society,
The challenge of pensioner poverty,
Regional variations in the experiences of older people,
How policy makers should respond to these findings.
Agenda
16:00 - 16:30 Registration
16:30 - 16:35 Welcome by Chair, Baroness Sally Greengross (ILC-UK)
16:35 - 16:40 Welcome by the Dean of Cass Business School, Professor Stete Habberman
16:40 - 16:50 Presentation from Richard Willets (Partnership)
16:50 - 17:10 Presentation from Gregg McClymont MP (Shadow Minister for Work and Pensions)
17:10 - 17:20 Presentation from Ben Franklin (ILC-UK)
17:20 - 17:30 Presentation from Professor Les Mayhew (Cass Business School) Presentation
17:30 - 17:35 Response from Tom Younger (Department for Work and Pensions)
17:35 - 18:25 Discussion/Q&A
18:25 - 18:30 Close by Chair, Baroness Sally Greengross (ILC-UK)
18:30 - 19:15 Drinks reception
Public service and demographic change: an ILC-UK/Actuarial Profession joint d...ILC- UK
Full details of the event are available here: http://www.ilcuk.org.uk/index.php/events/ilc_uk_and_the_actuarial_profession_debate_public_service_and_demographic_c
The live blog for this event is available here: http://blog.ilcuk.org.uk/2013/04/23/live-blog-public-service-and-demographic-change/
Many older people have equity tied up in their homes that could be used to provide them with a greater income in later life and improve their standard of living. Traditionally, the ways to unlock the equity in people’s homes have been through downsizing, equity release lifetime loans or home reversion plans. However, not everyone is in a position to downsize, there are pros and cons to each approach, and all have associated costs.
The Equity Bank would provide a new way for people to unlock the equity in their home. It would be a state agency which provides people with a low cost fixed lifetime income in exchange for a fixed share of the equity in their home. The Equity Bank would take a charge on the person’s home and recover the value of the equity from the person’s estate after their death.
The event was chaired by Baroness Sally Greengross, Chief Executive of the ILC-UK. Nick Kirwan, Director of the ILC-UK Care Funding Advice Network, opened the discussion. Professor Les Mayhew of Cass Business School and co-author of the paper 'The UK Equity Bank - Towards income security in old age' thened present the concept, after which Paul Burstow MP responded. There was then time for questions and a general discussion.
27Mar14 - Community Matters Semiar Series - At Home - ppt presentation ILC- UK
The slides from the second in a series of three seminars from ILC-UK and Age UK on Community Matters - are our communities ready for ageing?
Full details here: http://www.ilcuk.org.uk/index.php/events/community_matters_are_our_communities_ready_for_ageing._at_home
Nueva presentación:
Asignatura: Historia de los países de habla inglesa / History of english-speaking countries.
✏ Título: UN SDG's project.: Scotland Case Study
#ODS 5 y 13: Igualdad de género y Acción por el clima / #SDG 5 and 13: Gender equality and Climate action
By: Ishbel Miller
02May14 - The demographic implications of Scottish independenceILC- UK
During 2014, ILC-UK, supported by the specialist insurance company, Partnership Assurance Group plc, is undertaking a series of events to explore the relationship between our changing demography and public policy.
The third event in the series explored the demographic implications of Scottish independence.
In 2014, Scotland will vote in an independence referendum which could significantly change its relationship with the rest of the United Kingdom. An independent Scotland would have a fully independent NHS, control a significant proportion of the North Sea oil reserves and will take on a percentage of the UK national debt.
An independent Scotland would also result in the UK having a new demographic makeup. There are currently a number of marked differences between the two countries which will be highlighted by the division. These include a 2.8 year gap in healthy life expectancy for men, as well as differences in overall life expectancy and mortality rates. Recent figures released by the ONS suggest that the future health of an independent Scotland may actually align with that of the UK. The number of children aged two to 15 either overweight or obese in Scotland is now equal to that of England (30%), and lower than Wales (36%), and Scottish men are significantly more active than their counterparts in both countries.
The seminar explored these differences, as well as how the demography of an independent Scotland may change over time, and what future Scottish Governments (with or without independence) may need to do to adapt to these demographic changes.
Scottish independence would have a number of age-related policy implications for both Scotland and the rest of the United Kingdom. The issue of Scotland’s ageing population has already entered political debate, with the SNP announcing that, if elected, they would make new pensioners £4.40 a month better off than in England, while also pledging to set up a commission looking at the state pension age. The Scottish government has also announced that benefits, tax credits and state pensions would continue to be paid from the first day of independence, but have not addressed how they will meet the challenge of moving schemes from one administration to another.
Stephen Boyd, NERI Seminar on Devolution Post Scottish Referendum on Independ...Daragh McCarthy
Stephen Boyd's slides from his presentation at the Nevin Economic Research Institute's seminar on devolution post the Scottish referendum on independence. The seminar was held on November 18, 2014.
Presentation delivered to the STUC's DEcent Work, Dignified Lives conference on 15 Oct 2014 by Karel Williams and Sukhdev Johal of Manchester University's Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change (CRESC). Presentation discusses failures of both the current development model and some alternatives debated during the independence referendum and the proposes a new model for Scotland.
Science advice to government - Auckland conferencebis_foresight
Presentation by Sir Mark Walport at the Science Advice to Governments conference held in Auckland, 28-29 August 2014.
(This is the final version of the presentation, as it was delivered.)
Slides from breakout session B4: Update on Brexit and the implications for charities, from the NCVO Annual Conference which took place on 16 April 2018.
As part of our Norfolk Annual VCSE Conference, Nikki Luke, Senior Education and Engagement Officer for the East of England, will be delivering a politically neutral session on the opportunities for engaging with and influencing Parliament to ensure the voices of those we support are heard.
Public service and demographic change: an ILC-UK/Actuarial Profession joint d...ILC- UK
Full details of the event are available here: http://www.ilcuk.org.uk/index.php/events/ilc_uk_and_the_actuarial_profession_debate_public_service_and_demographic_c
The live blog for this event is available here: http://blog.ilcuk.org.uk/2013/04/23/live-blog-public-service-and-demographic-change/
Many older people have equity tied up in their homes that could be used to provide them with a greater income in later life and improve their standard of living. Traditionally, the ways to unlock the equity in people’s homes have been through downsizing, equity release lifetime loans or home reversion plans. However, not everyone is in a position to downsize, there are pros and cons to each approach, and all have associated costs.
The Equity Bank would provide a new way for people to unlock the equity in their home. It would be a state agency which provides people with a low cost fixed lifetime income in exchange for a fixed share of the equity in their home. The Equity Bank would take a charge on the person’s home and recover the value of the equity from the person’s estate after their death.
The event was chaired by Baroness Sally Greengross, Chief Executive of the ILC-UK. Nick Kirwan, Director of the ILC-UK Care Funding Advice Network, opened the discussion. Professor Les Mayhew of Cass Business School and co-author of the paper 'The UK Equity Bank - Towards income security in old age' thened present the concept, after which Paul Burstow MP responded. There was then time for questions and a general discussion.
27Mar14 - Community Matters Semiar Series - At Home - ppt presentation ILC- UK
The slides from the second in a series of three seminars from ILC-UK and Age UK on Community Matters - are our communities ready for ageing?
Full details here: http://www.ilcuk.org.uk/index.php/events/community_matters_are_our_communities_ready_for_ageing._at_home
Nueva presentación:
Asignatura: Historia de los países de habla inglesa / History of english-speaking countries.
✏ Título: UN SDG's project.: Scotland Case Study
#ODS 5 y 13: Igualdad de género y Acción por el clima / #SDG 5 and 13: Gender equality and Climate action
By: Ishbel Miller
02May14 - The demographic implications of Scottish independenceILC- UK
During 2014, ILC-UK, supported by the specialist insurance company, Partnership Assurance Group plc, is undertaking a series of events to explore the relationship between our changing demography and public policy.
The third event in the series explored the demographic implications of Scottish independence.
In 2014, Scotland will vote in an independence referendum which could significantly change its relationship with the rest of the United Kingdom. An independent Scotland would have a fully independent NHS, control a significant proportion of the North Sea oil reserves and will take on a percentage of the UK national debt.
An independent Scotland would also result in the UK having a new demographic makeup. There are currently a number of marked differences between the two countries which will be highlighted by the division. These include a 2.8 year gap in healthy life expectancy for men, as well as differences in overall life expectancy and mortality rates. Recent figures released by the ONS suggest that the future health of an independent Scotland may actually align with that of the UK. The number of children aged two to 15 either overweight or obese in Scotland is now equal to that of England (30%), and lower than Wales (36%), and Scottish men are significantly more active than their counterparts in both countries.
The seminar explored these differences, as well as how the demography of an independent Scotland may change over time, and what future Scottish Governments (with or without independence) may need to do to adapt to these demographic changes.
Scottish independence would have a number of age-related policy implications for both Scotland and the rest of the United Kingdom. The issue of Scotland’s ageing population has already entered political debate, with the SNP announcing that, if elected, they would make new pensioners £4.40 a month better off than in England, while also pledging to set up a commission looking at the state pension age. The Scottish government has also announced that benefits, tax credits and state pensions would continue to be paid from the first day of independence, but have not addressed how they will meet the challenge of moving schemes from one administration to another.
Stephen Boyd, NERI Seminar on Devolution Post Scottish Referendum on Independ...Daragh McCarthy
Stephen Boyd's slides from his presentation at the Nevin Economic Research Institute's seminar on devolution post the Scottish referendum on independence. The seminar was held on November 18, 2014.
Presentation delivered to the STUC's DEcent Work, Dignified Lives conference on 15 Oct 2014 by Karel Williams and Sukhdev Johal of Manchester University's Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change (CRESC). Presentation discusses failures of both the current development model and some alternatives debated during the independence referendum and the proposes a new model for Scotland.
Science advice to government - Auckland conferencebis_foresight
Presentation by Sir Mark Walport at the Science Advice to Governments conference held in Auckland, 28-29 August 2014.
(This is the final version of the presentation, as it was delivered.)
Slides from breakout session B4: Update on Brexit and the implications for charities, from the NCVO Annual Conference which took place on 16 April 2018.
As part of our Norfolk Annual VCSE Conference, Nikki Luke, Senior Education and Engagement Officer for the East of England, will be delivering a politically neutral session on the opportunities for engaging with and influencing Parliament to ensure the voices of those we support are heard.
03062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
role of women and girls in various terror groupssadiakorobi2
Women have three distinct types of involvement: direct involvement in terrorist acts; enabling of others to commit such acts; and facilitating the disengagement of others from violent or extremist groups.
In a May 9, 2024 paper, Juri Opitz from the University of Zurich, along with Shira Wein and Nathan Schneider form Georgetown University, discussed the importance of linguistic expertise in natural language processing (NLP) in an era dominated by large language models (LLMs).
The authors explained that while machine translation (MT) previously relied heavily on linguists, the landscape has shifted. “Linguistics is no longer front and center in the way we build NLP systems,” they said. With the emergence of LLMs, which can generate fluent text without the need for specialized modules to handle grammar or semantic coherence, the need for linguistic expertise in NLP is being questioned.
हम आग्रह करते हैं कि जो भी सत्ता में आए, वह संविधान का पालन करे, उसकी रक्षा करे और उसे बनाए रखे।" प्रस्ताव में कुल तीन प्रमुख हस्तक्षेप और उनके तंत्र भी प्रस्तुत किए गए। पहला हस्तक्षेप स्वतंत्र मीडिया को प्रोत्साहित करके, वास्तविकता पर आधारित काउंटर नैरेटिव का निर्माण करके और सत्तारूढ़ सरकार द्वारा नियोजित मनोवैज्ञानिक हेरफेर की रणनीति का मुकाबला करके लोगों द्वारा निर्धारित कथा को बनाए रखना और उस पर कार्यकरना था।
‘वोटर्स विल मस्ट प्रीवेल’ (मतदाताओं को जीतना होगा) अभियान द्वारा जारी हेल्पलाइन नंबर, 4 जून को सुबह 7 बजे से दोपहर 12 बजे तक मतगणना प्रक्रिया में कहीं भी किसी भी तरह के उल्लंघन की रिपोर्ट करने के लिए खुला रहेगा।
01062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
31052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Future of the UK and Scotland presentation, 4 June 2014, London
1.
2. Welcome and introduction to the
ESRC’s Future of the UK and Scotland
programme of activities
• PHIL SOOBEN
• Director of Policy, Resources and
Communications
• Economic and Social Research Council
3. The current state of the debate
CURRENT POLITICAL STRATEGIES
• PROFESSOR CHARLIE JEFFERY
• Future of the UK and Scotland Research
Co-ordinator
• University of Edinburgh
6. Political Strategies
• How the two sides are approaching the
referendum
– The ‘big picture’
– The economic implications
7. The big picture strategy
Should Scotland be an
independent country? Yes/No
A binary choice superimposed
on a three-way split in opinion
8. What should the Scottish Parliament do?
2013 data, Scottish Social Attitudes
Make all decisions for Scotland
(= independence)
31%
UK Government decides on defence and
foreign affairs, the Scottish Parliament
everything else
32%
UK Govt decides on defence, foreign
affairs, taxes and benefits, the Scottish
Parliament everything else (= now)
25%
UK Govt makes all decisions for Scotland 8%
9. The Median Voter
Make all decisions for Scotland
(= independence)
31%
UK Government decides on defence and
foreign affairs, the Scottish Parliament
everything else
32%
UK Govt decides on defence, foreign
affairs, taxes and benefits, the Scottish
Parliament everything else (= now)
25%
UK Govt makes all decisions for Scotland 8%
10. Yes: What kind of independence?
• Scottish Govt White Paper Nov 2013: ‘independence
with partnership’
– Doing some things markedly differently from RUK
– Doing the same things as RUK but better
– Doing the same things in much the same way as now in
partnership with RUK
• Keeping five of the six current unions: EU, NATO, currency,
monarchy, social union
11. Yes: What kind of independence?
• Scottish Govt White Paper Nov 2013: ‘independence
with partnership’
– Doing some things markedly differently from RUK
– Doing the same things as RUK but better
– Doing the same things in much the same way as now in
partnership with RUK
• Keeping five of the six current unions: EU, NATO, currency,
monarchy, social union
– This the key terrain in the debate
12. Yes: What kind of independence?
• Scottish Govt White Paper Nov 2013: ‘independence
with partnership’
– Doing some things markedly differently from RUK
– Doing the same things as RUK but better
– Doing the same things in much the same way as now in
partnership with RUK
• Keeping five of the six current unions: EU, NATO, currency,
monarchy, social union
– This the key terrain in the debate
• A principled vision of independence? Yes
13. Yes: What kind of independence?
• Scottish Govt White Paper Nov 2013: ‘independence
with partnership’
– Doing some things markedly differently from RUK
– Doing the same things as RUK but better
– Doing the same things in much the same way as now in
partnership with RUK
• Keeping five of the six current unions: EU, NATO, currency,
monarchy, social union
– This the key terrain in the debate
• A principled vision of independence? Yes
• Referendum tactic? That too
14. The Median Voter
Make all decisions for Scotland
(= independence)
31%
UK Government decides on defence and
foreign affairs, the Scottish Parliament
everything else
32%
UK Govt decides on defence, foreign
affairs, taxes and benefits, the Scottish
Parliament everything else (= now)
25%
UK Govt makes all decisions for Scotland
2013 data
8%
15. The UK Govt No:
the Scotland Analysis Series
• Feb 2013 to May 2014
• 14 papers, ~ 1,500 pages
– Several on economy, plus defence, security,
EU/international, borders/migration, research
– Core message: status quo better than
independence
– Written in measured, scholarly manner, not
dismissing ‘independence with partnership’, but
‘no guaranteed access’ …
16. Until
• Currency Union debate February 2014
• Formal sterling currency union ruled out
– By Scotland Analysis paper
– By publication of civil service advice
– By Conservative, Labour, LibDem figures in one voice
“it is not going to happen”
Refusal to engage on the terrain
of ‘independence with partnership’
17. Why?
• A set of beliefs at the UK level about what
‘independence’ means (see EU debate)
• A pre-negotiating stance? [The Scottish Govt
view]
• Tactics: (one part of an) electoral pincer
movement
18. The Median Voter
Make all decisions for Scotland
(= independence)
31%
UK Government decides on defence and
foreign affairs, the Scottish Parliament
everything else
32%
UK Govt decides on defence, foreign
affairs, taxes and benefits, the Scottish
Parliament everything else (= now)
25%
UK Govt makes all decisions for Scotland
2013 data
8%
19. The Other Part: When No Means More …
• Proposals for further-reaching devolution if
Scotland votes No from pro-union parties,
think tanks
– Tax devolution, welfare devolution
– The Conservatives yesterday completed the set
• Completing the pincer movement on the
median voter
20. The Median Voter
Make all decisions for Scotland
(= independence)
31%
UK Government decides on defence and
foreign affairs, the Scottish Parliament
everything else
32%
UK Govt decides on defence, foreign
affairs, taxes and benefits, the Scottish
Parliament everything else (= now)
25%
UK Govt makes all decisions for Scotland
2013 data
8%
21. The Economy
• Voters’ views of the economic consequences
of independence are the best predictors of Yes
or No voting
22. The Economy (aka the £500 question)
“Say it was clear that if Scotland became an
independent country (separate from the rest of the
UK) the standard of living would be higher/lower
and people would on average be £500 a year
better/worse off.
In these circumstances would you be in favour or
against Scotland becoming an independent
country?”
Scottish Social Attitudes Survey
23. £500
2013 £500 Better
off
No change £500 Worse
off
% % %
In favour of
independence 52 34 15
Neither 12 9 16
Against
independence
30 40 72
24. Last Week …
• UK Govt paper: Scots £1,400 better off in
union
• Scottish Govt paper: Scots £1,000 better off
with independence
• Different assumptions, each challenged
– See www.futureukandscotland/blog/financial-
reflections-blog-round
• A turbo-charged version of the £500 question
25. The current state of the debate
THE DEBATE AROUND DEFENCE
• DR COLIN FLEMING
• ESRC Scottish Centre on Constitutional Change
• University of Edinburgh
•
27. The Defence Debate
• Small States vs Large States
• What Scotland Wants?
• NATO and Trident?
• Defence Relationship with the UK
28. The current state of the debate
THE EU MEMBERSHIP DEBATE
• PROFESSOR MICHAEL KEATING
• Director, Scottish Centre on Constitutional
Change
• University of Edinburgh
29. The current state of the debate
• PROFESSOR CHARLIE JEFFERY
• DR COLIN FLEMING
• PROFESSOR MICHAEL KEATING
30.
31. What business thinks
UNCERTAINTIES FOR BUSINESS LEADERS
• PROFESSOR BRAD MACKAY
• ESRC Senior Scottish Fellow in the Scotland
Analysis
• University of Edinburgh Business School
32. THE SCOTTISH INDEPENDENCE DEBATE:
EVIDENCE FROM BUSINESS
Future of the UK and Scotland
12.30pm – 3.30pm, Wednesday 4 June 2014
Hoare Memorial Hall, Church House Conference Centre
Dean's Yard, London SW1P 3NZ
Professor Brad MacKay, University of Edinburgh Business School
33. What risks and opportunities does the independence
referendum pose for businesses in Scotland? Are
businesses planning for the referendum, and if they are,
how? Is the constitutional debate impacting on business
decisions? What decisions might be taken in different
constitutional scenarios?
The Scottish independence debate and referendum
raises questions about how conditions of constitutional
uncertainty are influencing business decision-making
across diverse industry sectors in Scotland.
Uncertainties around issues such as fiscal and monetary
policies, currency, industry regulation, international
agreements, or future participation in the EU have
implications for businesses operating in Scotland, and
influence decisions on whether to invest, re-invest,
expand, withdraw, locate or relocate business activity.
THE SCOTTISH INDEPENDENCE DEBATE:
EVIDENCE FROM BUSINESS
35. THE SAMPLE
By Sector No. %
Financial Services (life insurance, retail, wealth
management) 20 33
Energy (incl. Hydro and Oil and Gas companies) 12 20
Electronics/Technology 9 15
Life Science 7 12
Engineering/Industrial Manufacturing 12 20
Total 60 100
Other (Food and Drink) 4
36. COMPANY PROFILE
36
By Size No. %
Large 32 53
Medium (2XS/M) 28 47
Total 60 100
Primary
Trade/Customers
No. %
Scotland 6 10
rUK 16 27
Global 38 63
Total 60 100
Ownership
Structure
No. %
PLC 28 47
Private 18 30
Partnership 8 13
Trade Body 6 10
Total 60 100
Ownership No. %
Scotland 33 55
rUK 12 20
Abroad 15 25
Total 60 100
37. THE SCOTTISH ECONOMY
Source: McPhee, D. 2013. Business in Scotland. Scottish Government,
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Statistics/Browse/Business/Corporate
40. RISKS
“It’s perceived risk around stability.
And I guess there’s a number of
subsets of that, so one of them is
fiscal…issues around currency…
concerns around who the
regulators will be, where they’ll be
based, what the influence of
Europe may or may not be on
that… EU safety regulation…
there’s questions about Scotland’s
EU membership, our infrastructure
will cross boundaries … So there’s
a whole host of issues but they all
really come down to this question
of stability or uncertainty around
what these things might look like.”
L, PLC, rUK, Global
40
“I think the simple answer to that
is no. Because sometimes I think
the people who are raising the
uncertainty issues, I’m not sure
they get out enough, you
know…we’re all in the EU
transacting cross-border… we’re
dealing with a multitude of
currencies, different nationalities.
So for the life of me, if Scotland
chooses independence, I don’t
see necessarily why that is going
to overcomplicate things. I just
can’t see it.”
(ET, M, Priv., Global)
Indicative View Minority View
42. Industry
Financial
Services
Life
Sciences
Electronics/
Technology
Engineering/
Ind. Manuf.
Energy (incl.
oil and gas)
Key Opportunities
Products/Services 4 2 -- 1 1
Income tax decreases 6 -- -- 2 --
Corp tax decreases 2 -- -- 2 2
Access to government -- 1 1 1 1
Liberal Immigration 2 2 1 2 1
R&D Rebates -- -- 1 -- --
Redesign Regulations -- 1 1 -- 3
Scottish Brand/Pride 1 -- 1 1 --
Made in Scotland prov. -- -- -- 1 2
Gov. funding/subsidy -- 4 -- 2 2
Connections -- 2 1 1 --
Skills training -- -- -- 1 1
Influence EU Directly -- -- -- 1 1
Change model of
independence 2 -- -- -- 1
OPPORTUNITIES
43. OPPORTUNITIES
“[Reducing] Import/export
legislation. Taxation associated
with cross border trade.
Regulation of the business in
Scotland… Change. And risk, and
fear, and all these other things,
plus opportunity, catalyse action in
a way that doesn’t happen if it’s
just the status quo... I think there
would be a sense of immediacy in
terms of what one could do that
would really affect prosperity, in a
way that’s maybe different in a
larger country.” (EM, M. Priv., SB,
FO, Global)
“I think if Scotland went
Independent, it would make the
most of it, and it would rise to the
challenge, and everybody would
do the best they could… But I
think certainly initially in the short
term, it would be a net loss and
wouldn’t bring any benefits in the
short term at all, other than to
perhaps generate a bit more
national pride and the will to
overcome the difficulties. But it’s
not just about Scotland; it’s
about Scotland’s place in the
larger world...” (EM, M. Priv., SB)
Indicative view … Minority view…
45. Industry
Financial
Services
Life
Sciences
Electronics/
Technology
Engineering/
Ind. Manuf.
Energy (incl.
oil and gas)
Contingency Planning
Discussions 16 1 2 2 5
Monitoring risks 4 1 2 1 1
Analysis/tactical plans 12 -- -- 4 4
Investing in/existing
option to restructure 3 -- 3 1 2
Rely on business
continuity plans 3 1 2 -- --
Deferring investment -- 1 -- 1 --
CONTINGENCY PLANNING
* These numbers are fluid and, data suggests, largely reflect the time interviews were
conducted and previous stability in the polls. A narrowing of the polls is likely to result in more
wide-spread contingency planning, as has the publication of annual reports in recent weeks.
46. CONTINGENCY PLANNING
“None at all, as I say, I can only
see positives if Scotland were to
gain its independence. And I think
a lot of the debate up here around
issues going across the border are
just overheated nonsense frankly.”
(ET, Priv., M, Global)
“[Contingency planning] is bluster.
If there’s a yes vote you don’t
know what the environment will
be.”
(EM, L., Priv., Global).
“None whatsoever.”
(ET, M., Priv., Global)
On the other hand …On the one hand …
“Very informal. There has been no
contingency plan, though I’m being
asked more and more, what would
you do if Scotland were to go
independent… we could be based
anywhere.” (FS, M. Priv., EU).
“You know, I can’t afford to move the
business, nor would I want to … but
if there are problems by way of
labour migration or customers not
wanting to necessarily trade as
easily, or suddenly I’m a Scottish
supplier and not a UK supplier, then
I’m building a supply chain, a near-
shore supply chain as a
contingency.” (EM, L., PLC, rUK).
48. DRAWING CONCLUSIONS
FROM THE SAMPLE …
Uncertainty poses a challenge for business leaders;
The risks expressed by business leaders are highly
specific and directly concern business activity;
The opportunities are less specific and tend to relate
to the politics of the debate;
Business leaders of medium-sized, private
companies exporting globally are the most likely to
emphasise the opportunities presented by the
possibility of Scottish independence;
PLC companies headquartered in Scotland appear
most affected;
49. DRAWING CONCLUSIONS
FROM THE SAMPLE…
Companies whose trade is mainly in the rUK
(typically 90%, with 10% in Scotland) appear far more
affected than companies whose trade is mainly in
Scotland or is global;
Medium sized, privately owned companies appear
more willing to absorb downside risk than PLCs;
Medium sized, foreign-owned companies trading
predominantly in a global market indicate they are less
affected by the constitutional debate than PLCs
trading primarily in the rUK;
About 10% of companies indicate they have
contingency plans to restructure their businesses to
migrate economic activity out of Scotland.
51. “But this isn’t a complex or complicated debate for us. It’s really very
straightforward. We have 3 categories of stakeholder whose interest
we need to bear in mind: our customers, our shareholders, and our
employees. And we’re a PLC … so our shareholders’ interests are
obviously of paramount importance. So it’s, does the economic
environment in which we operate, does it support the continued
sustainability of the business and the future prosperity of those three
groups. And if it doesn’t, what do we do about it. It’s not a political
debate for us. It isn’t complicated. But it’s trying to take the politics out
of it that’s the difficult thing. If you take any of those three stakeholder
groups, employees for example, it’s very difficult to, in their minds, to
differentiate between the political statement and the statement
protecting stakeholders’ interests. So it’s quite difficult….But in terms
of understanding what the right thing to do is, that’s not difficult at all.
That’s not difficult. We’ve got to protect the interests of those three
groups.” (PLC., L., rUK)
52. FIRM BEHAVIOUR?
Business behaviour will be driven by protecting:
Customers
Ability to sell products/services (location of customer base,
regulations, reputation);
Ability to access markets (ie. MOD, EU, rUK, trade agreements).
Employees
Ability to attract high value, skilled labour (ie. quality of life);
Ability to maintain high value, skilled labour (ie. personal taxes).
Shareholders
Ability to create value (ie. perception, profitability);
Value destruction (ie. through increasing costs/complexity).
Environment/Government Support
Trading environment competitiveness/Government support
53. THE SCENARIO MATRIX
INDEPENDENCE
HEAVY
(HIGH TRANSITION
COSTS)
DEVO MINOR
INDEPENDENCE
LITE
(MODEST TRANSITION
COSTS)
DEVO PLUS
Behaviours
Conflict Partnership
Referendum
Vote
Yes
No
54. THE SCOTTISH PRIVATE
SECTOR IN THE TRANSITION?
Source: McPhee, D. 2013. Business in Scotland. Scottish Government,
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Statistics/Browse/Business/Corporate
56. What business thinks
SURVEY EVIDENCE ON BUSINESS AND
INDIVIDUAL ATTITUDES TO CONSTITUTIONAL
CHANGE
• PROFESSOR DAVID BELL
• ESRC Senior Scottish Fellow and part of the ESRC
Scottish Centre on Constitutional Change
• University of Stirling
•
57. The Independence Debate: Views from Business
PROFESSOR DAVID BELL
DIVISION OF ECONOMICS
STIRLING MANAGEMENT SCHOOL
UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING
58. Business Attitudes to the Independence Debate
• Economy is vital to the referendum outcome
• University of Stirling has carried out two surveys of business opinion
• Key issues for businesses
– Taxation
– Currency
– Regulation
– Relationship with EU
59. How important is the following factor in deciding how you
are going to vote …
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Percent
How the Scottish economy will fare
YouGov Poll for University of Stirling taken Dec 2013 n = 2037
60. Exploring business attitudes: surveys of Scottish Chambers
of Commerce members in June 2013 and Feb 2014
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 1-9 10-49 50-250 250+
NumberofCompaniesinSample
Number of Employees
Jun 2013
Feb 2014
broadly the same size distribution ….
61. Where does your company mainly trade?
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Mainly
Scotland
Mainly rUK Mainly
Europe
Mainly RoW
NumberofCompanies
Jun 2013
Feb 2014
Most focussed on Scottish market …
62. Share of firms viewing each issue as ‘important’ or ‘very
important’ in relation to independence
Growing concerns in the business community …
63. Main concerns for firms by main trading area ….
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Income Tax
Rates
Corporation
tax
Business
Regulation
Currency Migration
Percentoffirmsviewingissueas
'important'or'extremelyimportant'
Mainly Scotland
Mainly rUK
Mainly Europe
Mainly RoW
65. Risks with independence …
shareoffirms
Source: Second Survey - Feb 2014
More firms take the view that there are
‘No opportunities’ rather than ‘No risks’
66. Risks with independence by main trading area …
38%
27%
8% 8% 9% 10%
39%
15%
7%
4%
23%
11%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
Uncertainty/
time it takes to
transfer to
independence
Less access /
business links
with the rUK
Less
identification
with the
'UK/British
brand'
Contraction of
the firm
No risks Other risk
Percentoffirms
Mainly rUK
Other
Source: Second Survey - Feb 2014
67. Opportunities – business views
– ‘More Scottish appropriate policies which will lead to a closer
identification with a Scottish brand which I think will have greater traction
with a global market.‘
– ‘Lower taxation & economic incentives. International inward investment.’
– ‘Although we might be hammered by differential exchange rates on our
importation of ingredients and raw materials - mostly sourced outside
Scotland, we might also benefit if a new Scottish currency is created and
the value sinks against our major trading currency partners. This could
improve competiveness?’
68. Risks – business views
– ‘Higher taxation, greater investment risk.’
– ‘Antagonisms currently being generated that seems to be sending the
wrong messages to the other UK members.’
– ‘The obvious risk is that the Scotland will be unable to meet its debts
when they fall due as the proposals from Salmond are lacking in any
business credibility’
– ‘If there is a yes vote overseas students will be uncertain where and how
they can apply for a Scottish Visa so they will study in another country’
69. Evidence of negative effects on trade – “the border effect”
• Border effect - trade is much higher within countries than across national
boundaries. Current evidence suggests high levels of trade “friction”
between Scotland and Rest of World (excluding Rest of UK) but very low
level of friction between Scotland and ruK
• Estimated effect of borders ~ 5 per cent of GDP
Source: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/archives/41434
70. Final thoughts …
• Large scale surveys suggest that businesses believe that risks associated
with independence outweigh opportunities
• Businesses strongly support the retention of a monetary union with rUK. In
their view, other currency options will have a negative or very negative
impact on their businesses.
• Independence is not the only risk/opportunity faced by Scottish businesses.
Leaving the EU, whether as part of the UK, or as an independent country is
viewed negatively by the majority of Scottish businesses.
• [Source: Bell, D. and McGoldrick, M. (2014) ‘Business attitudes to Constitutional Change’
Accessed at: http://www.futureukandscotland.ac.uk/papers/business-attitudes-constitutional-
change ]
73. Scottish independence: what the
public thinks
PUBLIC ATTITUDES AND SCOTLAND'S
INDEPENDENCE REFERENDUM
• PROFESSOR JOHN CURTICE
• ESRC Senior Scotland Fellow
• NatCen/ScotCen Social Research
• Strathclyde University
74. Public Attitudes and the
Referendum
John Curtice
whatscotlandthinks.org
@whatscotsthink
76. The Referendum Race
38 39 39 41 43 43
62 61 61 59 57 57
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Feb-May 13 July-Sept.
13
Oct-Dec. 13 Jan-mid
Feb. 14
Mid Feb-
Mar 14
Apr - May
14
Yes
No
Based on 9 polls conducted Feb-May 13; 11 July-Oct 13; 8 Oct-Dec. 1;, 7 Jan-mid Feb 14; 12 mid-Feb-Mar 14; 11 Apr-May 14.
Don’t Knows excluded
77. House Differences
45 45 44
41 40
38
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Panelbase ICM Survation TNS BMRB YouGov (Ipsos MORI)
%Yes
Based on all polls since Jan. Don’t Knows excluded
78. Partly A Question of Identity
67
46
16
9 7
18
39
71
81
87
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Sc not Br More Sc than
Br
Equal More Br than
Sc
Br not Sc
Yes
No
Source: Ipsos MORI May 14. Don’t Knows included in denominator
79. But Identity Largely Unchanging (and
Dual)
24 23 24 23 22 24
30 27 28 26 25 24
33
33 33 34 33 34
4
5 5 7
6 6
7 9 8 8
9 9
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Feb May Sept Dec Feb May
Sc not Br More Sc than Br Equal More Br than Sc Br not Sc
Source: Ipsos MORI
81. And Tracks Ref VI Better
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
Sept Jan Feb Mar Apr May
No Lead Net Economy Net Equality
Source: ICM Research. Don’t Knows included in denominators
82. Summary
• The No lead narrowed in the winter – but has
remained stable (at the lower level) in the
spring. Still differences between polls.
• People’s sense of national identity provides a
starting point, but is far from being a sole
determinant
• Thus the importance of the debate about the
economy (but less so equality). Yes progress in
this debate helps explain the smaller No lead
83. Scottish independence: what the
public thinks
THE ECONOMIC DIMENSION IN PUBLIC
OPINION
• PROFESSOR LIAM DELANEY
• ESRC Scottish Centre on Constitutional Change
• Stirling University
84. Citizen Preferences for Constitutional
Change in Scotland
David Bell, Liam Delaney and
Michael McGoldrick
Stirling Management School
University of Stirling
86. • Designed by Research Team
• Administered by Yougov in December 2013
• 2037 Respondents
• Follow-up from Scottish Election Survey
• Wide range of demographic and other questions
• Simple measure of risk aversion validated in recent papers
• Validated Measures of future orientation
Survey
88. Constitutional Options
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Scotland in the UK
with no increase in
powers
Scotland in the UK
with increased tax
powers
Scotland
independent,
pound
Scotland
independent, own
currency
Scotland
independent, euro
None of the above Don't know
Yes to independence No to independence Do not Know
93. Factors in Voting Intention
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Importance of Scotland's National debt
Yes to independence No to independence
94. Factors in Voting Intention
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Importance of pension entitlements to voters
Yes to independence No to independence
95. Economic Voting
70%
4%
5%
3% 3% 3% 4%
8%
63%
1%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
8%
27%
3%
5%
7%
10%
7%
4%
39%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
No amount would
make
Less than 500
per year
500 to 1,000 1,001 to 2,000 2,001 to 5,000 5,000 to 10,000 More than 10,000 Don't know
96. Economic Voting
17%
24%
13% 14% 14%
18%
3%
7%
12%
20%
26%
32%
7%
15%
20%
28%
20%
11%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Less than 500 per
year
500 to 1,000 1,001 to 2,000 2,001 to 5,000 5,000 to 10,000 More than 10,000
Amount of income to sway the changeable minds
Yes to independence No to independence D0 not know
97. • Higher risk willingness substantially increases support for
Independence
• Females less supportive of Independence
• Those born in Scotland more supportive
• Older and higher income less supportive
• Some of gender effect explained by risk willingness
Statistical Modelling
98. • Salience
• Priming of risk
• Framing of risk
• Risk and Ambiguity
• Risk and Benefit “Overload”
• Endowment Effects
Further Questions
101. Scotland and the Rest of the UK
BRITISH ELECTION STUDY: FIRST FINDINGS ON
CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES IN SCOTLAND, WALES,
ENGLAND
• PROFESSOR JANE GREEN
• Institute for Social Change
• Manchester University
102. Constitutional issues in Scotland, Wales and England
Professor Jane Green, University of Manchester
103. BES2015 data collection - wave 1
• 20,881 person online sample fielded by YouGov
• 4,139 respondents in Scotland
• 2,256 respondents in Wales
• Fieldwork: 20 February – 9 March 2014
• Same respondents surveyed again end May, after
September 2014, and then 2015 onwards
• 5 minute module to Scottish respondents
• Large number of items on Scottish independence
104. Scottish constitutional preference Qs
• If Scotland votes to remain part of the United
Kingdom, *should* the Scottish Parliament have
more powers than it does at present, fewer powers,
or should the Parliament's powers stay about the
same as they are now.
• And if Scotland votes to remain part of the United
Kingdom, do you think that the powers devolved to
the Scottish parliament *will* change?
108. Welsh and English preferences for Scotland
remaining in the Union
68
16 16
68
16 16
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Remain UK Independent Don't know
English
Welsh
109. Welsh constitutional preference Qs
• Which of these statements comes closest to your view?
There should be no devolved government in Wales
The National Assembly for Wales should have fewer powers
We should leave things as they are now
The National Assembly for Wales should have more powers
Wales should become independent, separate from the UK
• How do you think that the powers devolved to the
National Assembly for Wales will change over the next
few years?
112. English constitutional preference Qs
• Some UK laws only affect England because some policies are
decided in Scotland and Wales. How do you think laws that
only affect England should be made?
• By UK Parliament, with all MPs having a vote 18%
• By UK Parliament, only English MPs having a vote 47%
• By a new, separate parliament for England, but with
England remaining part of the UK 13%
• By a new, separate parliament for England, England
becoming independent from the rest of the UK 4%
• Don't know 18%
113. BES data playground from summer 2014
www.britishelectionstudy.com
ESRC Future of the UK and Scotland
4 June 2014
114. 0-100 expectations that Scotland will
choose independence
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Scotland will definitely choose
independence
Scotland will definitely choose to stay
in UK
%
115. If expect Scotland to become independent
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Many fewer powers Some fewer powers Same Some more powers Many more powers
Scotland in the Union Independent Scotland
116. The BES instruments
2015 General Election
Pre
N = 20,000
Post-election face-to-face
probability sample
+ mailback inc. CSES module
N = 3,000
Post
N = 20,000
Scottish and
local elections
N = 20,000
Local elections
N = 15,000
Twitter data harvest
January 2014 May 2014 September 2014
May 2017 May 2016
Voter registration data matching
2010
election
sample
2005
election
sample
Base sample
N = 20,000
European and
local elections
N = 20,000
Independence
referendum
N = 20,000
Daily rolling thunder
N = 650 per day
117. Scotland and the Rest of the UK
WHAT KIND OF RELATIONSHIP COULD A POST-
YES SCOTLAND HAVE WITH THE REST OF THE
UK?
• DR NICOLA MCEWEN
• Associate Director, ESRC Scottish Centre on
Constitutional Change
• University of Edinburgh
118. What kind of relationship could a
post-yes Scotland have with the
rest of the UK?
Dr Nicola McEwen
University of Edinburgh
Associate Director
ESRC Scottish Centre on Constitutional Change
119. Yes to what…?
What would ‘an independent
country’ look like?
Scottish Government’s
independence vision embedded
within British Isles and EU
Independence as end of only the
parliamentary union –
monarchical, currency, defence,
European, and social unions
would remain intact
Institutional and governmental
co-operation & ‘strategic
partnerships’ with rUK
“with independence… Scotland
and the rest of the UK would both
stand on our own two feet – taking
our own decisions, and working
together on issues of common
interest. Our relationship would be
what it should always have been – a
partnership of equals.”
Nicola Sturgeon MSP,
Deputy First Minister
June 2013
120. White Paper on Scotland’s Future:
a vision of cooperative governance
Shared monarchy
Sterling currency union
Common Travel Area/labour
market
Cross-border agreements in
specialist health care
services/transplant
Common research area in
higher education
Strategic energy partnership,
GB market, Green Investment
Bank
BBC/SBC Joint venture
UK-wide National Lottery/Big
Lottery Fund
Cross-border co-operation to
combat serious & organised
crime
Functional cross-border bodies,
e.g. Office of Rail Regulation,
Civil Aviation Authority
Informal partnership - as
‘equals’ and ‘allies’ - within
NATO/the European Union
121. No pre-negotiation
Benefits of union as ‘best of
both worlds’ +
Hard view of independence as
separation:
no currency union;
EU/NATO membership in doubt
Likely necessity of border posts
No energy partnership/integrated
common market
Defence co-operation unlikely
Hard pre-referendum
stance
“…the value of the pound lies in the
entire monetary system underpinning
it... supported by political union,
banking union and automatic
transfers of public spending across
the United Kingdom. A vote to leave
the UK is also a vote to leave these
unions and those transfers and those
monetary arrangements…
If Scotland walks away from the
UK, it walks away from the UK
pound. ”
George Osborne
Chancellor of the Exchequer
122. Post-Yes
pragmatism?
Edinburgh agreement >
loser’s consent/goodwill
Desire to maintain stability
Easier to maintain co-
operation than to
completely dismantle union
EU as a driver promoting
cross-border co-operation
and integration
“we will continue to work
together constructively in the
light of the outcome,
whatever it is, in the best
interests of the people of
Scotland and of the rest of
the United Kingdom”
Edinburgh
Agreement, 2012
123. Competing interests – business, regional, political, international
– shape and constrain choices
UK Gen Election > political costs of (in)action
Principled & practical objection to pooling sovereignty/ceding
control
Resistance to imposed change on centre
Concessions, where they come, will imply constraints
Limits to cooperative governance
124. Inadequacies of existing machinery of IGR - Joint Ministerial
Committee/British-Irish Council
Annual summits/joint working groups on the UK-Irish model?
Standing institutions - e.g. North South Ministerial Council,
Nordic Council of Ministers - can help to:
foster mutual trust
nurture common purpose/identity
raise awareness
get issues on national agendas
Informal bilateral networks crucial
Governing Interdependence after
independence
125. “Our citizens, uniquely linked by
geography and history, are connected today as never before... Our two
economies benefit from a flow of people, goods, investment, capital and
ideas on a scale that is rare even in this era of global economic
integration…
“We intend that this Joint Statement will be the starting point for
realising the potential over the next decade of even stronger relations for
current and future generations living on these islands.”
David Cameron and Enda Kenny, March 2012
Why would it be different for
Scotland?
126. Dr Nicola McEwen, University of Edinburgh
Email: N.McEwen@ed.ac.uk
@mcewen_nicola
ESRC Future of the UK and Scotland Programme website:
http://www.futureukandscotland.ac.uk
@UKScotland
Further info
127. Scotland and the Rest of the UK
• PROFESSOR JANE GREEN
• DR NICOLA MCEWEN