Birgit Sauer - Conflicts over values: the issue of Moslem headscarvesARGE Bildungsmanagement
IV. Wiener Konferenz für Mediation 2006
"CULTURE MEETS CULTURE II"
Das »neue« Unbehagen in der Kultur
Termin: Freitag, 05.Mai 2006, 12.10-13.00
Dr.in Birgit Sauer (A), Politikwissenschaftlerin und Univ. Prof. am Institut für Politikwissenschaft der Universität Wien. Forschungsschwerpunkte: Politik der Geschlechterverhältnisse, Staats- und Institutionentheorien, Politik und Kultur
Video unter:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lo0ms5bXa8Q&feature=share&list=PLp7y0fn6UN_hh3wv3Vhw4B6l99kR4jLfs&index=1
World Religion - EndTime Magazine - May/June 2015miscott57
It is prophesied that, just before the Second Coming, a one-world religion will be established, demanding the allegiance of every person on earth. Unbeknownst
to many, the formation of this entity has been in the works for years, with great strides taken over the last several months.
It will be a false religion of which true Christians will never want to be a part.
http://www.tomrichey.net
The French Wars of Religion were a series of armed conflicts between French Catholics and Huguenots (Calvinists) in the sixteenth century. The Catholic faction was led by Catherine de Medici and the Huguenots were led by Henry of Navarre, who would later become Henry IV of France. Upon becoming king, Henry converted to Catholicism ("Paris is worth a Mass.") and issued the Edict of Nantes, which granted Huguenots limited toleration and rights to practice their religion openly in certain cities.
Birgit Sauer - Conflicts over values: the issue of Moslem headscarvesARGE Bildungsmanagement
IV. Wiener Konferenz für Mediation 2006
"CULTURE MEETS CULTURE II"
Das »neue« Unbehagen in der Kultur
Termin: Freitag, 05.Mai 2006, 12.10-13.00
Dr.in Birgit Sauer (A), Politikwissenschaftlerin und Univ. Prof. am Institut für Politikwissenschaft der Universität Wien. Forschungsschwerpunkte: Politik der Geschlechterverhältnisse, Staats- und Institutionentheorien, Politik und Kultur
Video unter:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lo0ms5bXa8Q&feature=share&list=PLp7y0fn6UN_hh3wv3Vhw4B6l99kR4jLfs&index=1
World Religion - EndTime Magazine - May/June 2015miscott57
It is prophesied that, just before the Second Coming, a one-world religion will be established, demanding the allegiance of every person on earth. Unbeknownst
to many, the formation of this entity has been in the works for years, with great strides taken over the last several months.
It will be a false religion of which true Christians will never want to be a part.
http://www.tomrichey.net
The French Wars of Religion were a series of armed conflicts between French Catholics and Huguenots (Calvinists) in the sixteenth century. The Catholic faction was led by Catherine de Medici and the Huguenots were led by Henry of Navarre, who would later become Henry IV of France. Upon becoming king, Henry converted to Catholicism ("Paris is worth a Mass.") and issued the Edict of Nantes, which granted Huguenots limited toleration and rights to practice their religion openly in certain cities.
Мировая политика как черное и белое: Иран и Израиль, или как люди становятся жертвами намеренно проецируемых на них заблуждений
Содержание
Введение
I. Каждый сектантский подход и каждая сектантская мысль являются порочной ошибкой и нетерпимым поступком
II. Политическая ситуация и международные отношения не определяют природу режимов, правительств и государств
III. Когда дело касается мировых дел, не существует шахматной доски с «черными» и «белыми» клетками
IV. Все СМИ сообщают одну и ту же ложь, меняя только «шахматные наборы»
V. Достоинство иранцев и палестинцев является наиболее спорным вопросом
VI. Вера в обещания, данные врагами, замаскированными под друзей, может оказаться смертельной
VII. Военные и фермеры против королевской семьи и аятолл
VIII. Нет никакой разницы между Ираном и Египтом, когда дело доходит до раболепия по отношению к крупным колониальным схемам
Contents
Introduction
I. Every sectarian approach and every sectarian thought are a vicious mistake and an intolerable act.
II. Political situations and international relations do not define the nature of regimes, governments, and states.
III. When it comes to world affairs, there is no such thing as a chessboard with "black" and "white" squares.
IV. All mass media report the same lies, changing only the «chess sets».
V. The dignity of the Iranians and the Palestinians is a most controversial subject.
VI. Believing promises given by enemies disguised as friends may be lethal.
VII. Military and farmers against the royals and the ayatollahs
VIII. There is no difference between Iran and Egypt when it comes to servility toward major colonial schemes.
[Ambassador Hassan] Speech: Presentation by Ambassador S. Azmat Hassan (Ret.)...GlobalPeaceFoundation
Date: Dec. 6th 2013
Session: Interfaith Partnerships: Faith and Diversity: Toward a Global Ethic for Inclusive and Moderate Societies
Speaker: Ambassador S. Azmat Hassan; Former Pakistani Ambassador to Malaysia, Syria and Morrocco, Islamic Republic of Pakistan
Initially published on 19 October 2006 in Buzzle
Excerpt:
The Muslim countries' upper middle-classes are the venomous enemy of the West.
The worst failure of America is not Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia and/or the perpetuation of the Palestinian problem. The worst failure is America's inability to accurately and timely identify the enemy.
The secret enemies of the Americans are their interlocutors.
1. The terrorists are just hands that commit criminal acts.
2. The extremist sheikhs are the owners of the factories that produce terrorists.
3. The bogus-universities that prepare the extremist sheikhs belong to the states, the supposedly US-friendly administrations that strive to help solve all problems with Israel (what a laugh!), while controlling the anti-Zionist local populations!
4. These states belong to the upper middle classes of the Muslim countries; the said social classes represent only a small portion of the society, i.e. the businesspeople, the managers and the directors, the professors and the army generals. As social class, they do not represent more than 2 to 3% of the entire population of each country-factory of Islamic Terrorism.
These people are the Muslim businesspeople, who routinely meet the experts of Microsoft and Intel, Vodafone and France Telecom; these are the traders who contact Toyota and Ford, the professors who hypocritically denounce Ossama Bin Laden, the generals who want to buy military aircraft spare parts, the actors and the singers who are dressed like average people in the streets of San Francisco, Napoli, Sydney and Amsterdam.
Theodore Dalrymple The Frivolity of Evil When prison.docxsusannr
Theodore Dalrymple
The Frivolity of Evil
When prisoners are released from prison, they often say that they have paid their debt
to society. This is absurd, of course: crime is not a matter of double-entry bookkeeping.
Autumn 2004
When prisoners are released from prison, they often say that they have paid their debt
to society. This is absurd, of course: crime is not a matter of double-entry bookkeeping.
You cannot pay a debt by having caused even greater expense, nor can you pay in
advance for a bank robbery by offering to serve a prison sentence before you commit it.
Perhaps, metaphorically speaking, the slate is wiped clean once a prisoner is released
from prison, but the debt is not paid off.
It would be just as absurd for me to say, on my imminent retirement after 14 years of my
hospital and prison work, that I have paid my debt to society. I had the choice to do
something more pleasing if I had wished, and I was paid, if not munificently, at least
adequately. I chose the disagreeable neighborhood in which I practiced because,
medically speaking, the poor are more interesting, at least to me, than the rich: their
pathology is more florid, their need for attention greater. Their dilemmas, if cruder,
seem to me more compelling, nearer to the fundamentals of human existence. No doubt
I also felt my services would be more valuable there: in other words, that I had some
kind of duty to perform. Perhaps for that reason, like the prisoner on his release, I feel I
have paid my debt to society. Certainly, the work has taken a toll on me, and it is time to
do something else. Someone else can do battle with the metastasizing social pathology of
Great Britain, while I lead a life aesthetically more pleasing to me.
My work has caused me to become perhaps unhealthily preoccupied with the problem
of evil. Why do people commit evil? What conditions allow it to flourish? How is it best
prevented and, when necessary, suppressed? Each time I listen to a patient recounting
the cruelty to which he or she has been subjected, or has committed (and I have listened
http://www.city-journal.org/index.html
to several such patients every day for 14 years), these questions revolve endlessly in my
mind.
No doubt my previous experiences fostered my preoccupation with this problem. My
mother was a refugee from Nazi Germany, and though she spoke very little of her life
before she came to Britain, the mere fact that there was much of which she did not speak
gave evil a ghostly presence in our household.
Later, I spent several years touring the world, often in places where atrocity had recently
been, or still was being, committed. In Central America, I witnessed civil war fought
between guerrilla groups intent on imposing totalitarian tyranny on their societies,
opposed by armies that didn't scruple to resort to massacre. In Equatorial Guinea, the
current dictator was the nephew and henchman of the .
The countless rebellions in penitentiaries that have taken place in Brazil have led the federal and state governments to explain what happened as if they were the result of a factional dispute over drug trafficking, seeking to cover up the inhumane prison conditions where prisoners crowd into insufficient spaces that should be occupied by half of the existing prisoners. This situation demonstrates the incompetence of the governments that succeed in Brazil in the management of the penitentiary system and public security in general and the long-delayed judicial system that shows a lack of agility in the trial of detainees and thus avoid the increase of prisoners who multiply every day with the advance of violence against people and property.
Theodore DalrympleThe Frivolity of EvilWhen prisoners are .docxssusera34210
Theodore Dalrymple
The Frivolity of Evil
When prisoners are released from prison, they often say that they have paid their debt
to society. This is absurd, of course: crime is not a matter of double-entry bookkeeping.
Autumn 2004
When prisoners are released from prison, they often say that they have paid their debt
to society. This is absurd, of course: crime is not a matter of double-entry bookkeeping.
You cannot pay a debt by having caused even greater expense, nor can you pay in
advance for a bank robbery by offering to serve a prison sentence before you commit it.
Perhaps, metaphorically speaking, the slate is wiped clean once a prisoner is released
from prison, but the debt is not paid off.
It would be just as absurd for me to say, on my imminent retirement after 14 years of my
hospital and prison work, that I have paid my debt to society. I had the choice to do
something more pleasing if I had wished, and I was paid, if not munificently, at least
adequately. I chose the disagreeable neighborhood in which I practiced because,
medically speaking, the poor are more interesting, at least to me, than the rich: their
pathology is more florid, their need for attention greater. Their dilemmas, if cruder,
seem to me more compelling, nearer to the fundamentals of human existence. No doubt
I also felt my services would be more valuable there: in other words, that I had some
kind of duty to perform. Perhaps for that reason, like the prisoner on his release, I feel I
have paid my debt to society. Certainly, the work has taken a toll on me, and it is time to
do something else. Someone else can do battle with the metastasizing social pathology of
Great Britain, while I lead a life aesthetically more pleasing to me.
My work has caused me to become perhaps unhealthily preoccupied with the problem
of evil. Why do people commit evil? What conditions allow it to flourish? How is it best
prevented and, when necessary, suppressed? Each time I listen to a patient recounting
the cruelty to which he or she has been subjected, or has committed (and I have listened to several such patients every day for 14 years), these questions revolve endlessly in my
mind.
No doubt my previous experiences fostered my preoccupation with this problem. My
mother was a refugee from Nazi Germany, and though she spoke very little of her life
before she came to Britain, the mere fact that there was much of which she did not speak
gave evil a ghostly presence in our household.
Later, I spent several years touring the world, often in places where atrocity had recently
been, or still was being, committed. In Central America, I witnessed civil war fought
between guerrilla groups intent on imposing totalitarian tyranny on their societies,
opposed by armies that didn't scruple to resort to massacre. In Equatorial Guinea, the
current dictator was the nephew and henchman of the last dictator, who had killed or
driven into exile a third of the population, ...
04062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
03062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
‘वोटर्स विल मस्ट प्रीवेल’ (मतदाताओं को जीतना होगा) अभियान द्वारा जारी हेल्पलाइन नंबर, 4 जून को सुबह 7 बजे से दोपहर 12 बजे तक मतगणना प्रक्रिया में कहीं भी किसी भी तरह के उल्लंघन की रिपोर्ट करने के लिए खुला रहेगा।
El Puerto de Algeciras continúa un año más como el más eficiente del continente europeo y vuelve a situarse en el “top ten” mundial, según el informe The Container Port Performance Index 2023 (CPPI), elaborado por el Banco Mundial y la consultora S&P Global.
El informe CPPI utiliza dos enfoques metodológicos diferentes para calcular la clasificación del índice: uno administrativo o técnico y otro estadístico, basado en análisis factorial (FA). Según los autores, esta dualidad pretende asegurar una clasificación que refleje con precisión el rendimiento real del puerto, a la vez que sea estadísticamente sólida. En esta edición del informe CPPI 2023, se han empleado los mismos enfoques metodológicos y se ha aplicado un método de agregación de clasificaciones para combinar los resultados de ambos enfoques y obtener una clasificación agregada.
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series) The Acolyte. Learn about the influence of the program on the Star Wars world, as well as new characters and story twists.
Here is Gabe Whitley's response to my defamation lawsuit for him calling me a rapist and perjurer in court documents.
You have to read it to believe it, but after you read it, you won't believe it. And I included eight examples of defamatory statements/
An astonishing, first-of-its-kind, report by the NYT assessing damage in Ukraine. Even if the war ends tomorrow, in many places there will be nothing to go back to.
1. FREEDOM AND FREEDOM OF
EXPRESSION IN FRANCE ARE THE TRICKS
OF SATAN FOR THE MORAL DECLINE AND
THE PROVOCATION OF EVIL.
By Sadek Kheddache *
First I want to address this, sincerely speaking, I condemn the indiscriminate and
barbaric terrorism whether in France or elsewhere. Islam is completely innocent
of this blind extremism and unfounded or justified by Islamic Sharia.
Dr. Ghaleb BENCHEIKH very well demonstrated the simplicity of mind by which
we interpreted the verses of the Qur'an and hadith of the prophet to give them a
false sense to justify their despicable acts and crimes.
Terrorism is born of dictatorship, despotism, poverty and exclusion of whole
sections of society by the political authorities in Muslim countries.
The terrorist attack of Charlie hebdo, raised many questions and controversies
remain, however, still unclear to most people whether French or Muslims in the
world.
2. I would also like to express my opinion with a political-religious approach to
facilitate the understanding of the event, place it in context and make sense of
things, whether on the issue of freedom of expression or the reactions of Muslim
in France or in the world.
The history of secularism, freedom and freedom of expression in France has
undergone revolutionary steps, which despite everything and to date , have still
not solved all the contours, boundaries and defining the framework freedom and
freedom of expression.
France, like all western countries; God is therefore excluded from their society
and their politics by secularism, religion becomes just a personal confession, free
and excluded from political power and its political representation.
This freedom of expression, free and profligate, can be understood in the case of
the press, as an expression of free court imagination, often cognitive and
emotional, vis-à-vis social facts and social interactions the journalist without any
limits, whether they are about the laws of the republic, about religious
sensibilities, or morals and traditional values of communities in the world. Often
expressed a political position in France, hatred, resentment, racism, a bad taste
mockery, blasphemy, etc. and this by hiding behind free speech.
Yet it is clear that everyone has the freedom to stop where someone else's
begins. The freedom to say and in any situation could restrict the freedom of
others, inflicting direct or indirect damages. This principle has been observed
particularly in the 20th century and first in the European Convention on Human
Rights, the article states: "The exercise of these freedoms ... may be subject to
such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law ...»
The idea is that freedom of expression is counteracted by some duties and
responsibilities in relation to others. Because people are not able to lead a self
thereof, a judicial management is necessary. For the protection of persons,
groups and values including defamation, invasion has a reputation and sacred of
others, hate, etc.
That said, it is considered that the majority of French are religiously misguided,
atheists, worshipers of this life, worshipers of their carnal desires and their sense
of their extremism Epicureans, and Satan. Muslims respect the individual choice
and collective Western countries. Everyone is free to select his life and the life he
wants, but normally it should respect others and their values. Thus the
blasphemous caricatures of a prophet of God mean nothing to an atheist or
Islamophobic, since it ignores God. God and his prophets are nothing in him, he
denies God and his power, etc ... This type has nothing to envy to Satan himself,
though Satan does not deny the existence of God...
Those who are not with God, is with Satan or evil ego. It is then allowed to
conclude that the devil has a great grip on the people. He found the key to moral
decay and misguidance through the concept of freedom.
3. Since it obeys no law of God ,or of nature, now began to make the most heinous
acts against nature that gay marriage, Swingers legal women, pornography and
extremism in worship the devil through witchcraft; etc. All that it is the work of
the devil!
I once made a comparative sociological study from the requirements of Islam
from a Muslim country and a Western country, and this for tracked Satan's hold
on these communities and monitoring of his evil suggestions, I concluded that
virtually everything has been advocated for the happiness of man by Islam was
contradicted and that is doing absolutely the contrary in these societies there.
Whether in the way of living, dressing, eating, etc. until the tattoo has become a
fashion, he is prohibited by Islam. Confirming the total control of Satan stirs
even Islamophobia.
In short all blasphemy and atheism that God had sanctioned by disasters and
apocalyptic punishment since Noah's flood, the people of Ad and Thamoud, to
Sodom and Gomorrah, and the drowning of Pharaoh and his soldiers, etc ... is
much further to the extreme in the Western world today ...
The prophet that prayer and salvation of God be upon him, said: "If you have no
shame, do what you want! »
The Prophet humanly cried once, a Jewish death at the sight of his funeral
procession, he said, "I cry a human being who goes to hell, conquered Satan";
and as a Muslim, I want to say that the events in France do not call on Muslims
to react either in themselves or collectively. Because in France and in the West, it
offends God every day and a thousand times worse than the cartoons ... It is
absolutely ignore this kind of ridiculous mental retardation and blasphemies.
The only reaction that must be a Muslim is the one to fight against the respective
despotic regimes and Machiavellian finally to emerge the rulers at the height of
their missions and to commit to work honestly to develop the economic forces,
technological, and culture of their countries to get them out of their weak
position compared to the West.
However, freedom and freedom of expression does not mean still in France, to
say and do everything without any restraint or morality or civilized behavior! This
is serious! Do we want with these profligates go against the current of
civilization, the moralized and human emancipation and against the same civic
and civilized life today. This is evidence that does not give the meaning to be
freedom or freedom of expression, or it does it on purpose to ulterior purposes.
Besides this libertine form of freedom only applies to French, their understanding
of freedom must remain within their borders, in their society, without prejudice
to other countries values. What is this freedom of expression that we tolerate
insult others, that blasphemy that verbally abuses, caricature, or other
physically? This is not political? Catch a Fire is also allowed gay marriage, an act
against nature! Even these provocative Charlie hebdo , found only the grotesque
4. caricatures and immoral to try to make them laugh, and it's mostly the ass, sex,
and shit like ingredients for a really low-class humor, which irritates you by its
ridiculous. We do not do comedy with the sacred! Man when he tries to let Satan
captivated his reason and pushes to extremism of any kind in the name of
freedom, becomes itself a dangerous demon to society .But it was a well
pampered demon by the French government, and used as a media tool for
international political purposes. This media tool that has not been censored or
reminded order, indeed allowed to gauge the responsiveness of Muslims in the
world, ridicule them and remove the political and terrorist hares .It also political
marketing and emotional, based on an extreme scenario, as the attacks of
Charlie hebdo and store Cacher, to justify a strategy perspective or mobilize the
people to learn more dividends, including the fight against terrorism, the
stigmatization of Muslims in France and moreover, the consolidation of the rating
of the president and his government, etc. Demagoguery no longer consumable in
the West given the high level of education in these societies, which nowadays is
profitable politically, it is the manipulation and awareness of the masses by
scheduling events too strong and emotional those have a galvanizing effect on
the population, such as staging such attacks Charlie hebdo or store Cacher. What
proves that this is not the intelligence services and security Franco -Jews who
prepared these bloody events to draw political dividends? This is a dangerous
and secret strategy that foments to also justify military invasions in preparation.
This is the same thing which it was done by USA since and after the attacks of
September 11, 2001. September 11 have been prepared by the Republicans, the
CIA, the American and Israeli Jewish lobbies, to justify war against Iraq. Man has
in the history of mankind everything against peace, even against their individual
and social happiness, and well in general, he followed the suggestions of Satan is
still strong...
Satan said, "I ride on the back of the ignorant (ignorant of religion), as a man
rides his horse, and I guide where I want, as man guides his horse there or he
wants." he committed the most despicable and heinous acts, including the
worship of idols, barbarism, fornication, homosexuality, incest, heinous crime,
the debasement of men to slavery, and even bury her alive innocent baby, etc.
God has to teach a moral man through prophets and religions, which
unfortunately still censored and falsified by this man ,we are talking to the
perfect religion protected by the Creator himself against forgery which is the
Islam. This divine code that is in our hands allows man to live in the best
possible conditions and that if he honestly has obeyed all the laws of God and to
God's commands, he can already experience a paradise here on earth before
eternal paradise .but of course Satan swore he prevail swathes of humanity with
him to hell, and God omniscient did not contradict, but he told her that the men
who follow him, go with him to hell, and those who follow the way of God and
that of his prophet Mohammed that prayer and salvation of God be upon him,
will go to eternal paradise.
5. Freedom to attack and insult others when you have some intellectual level and
knowledge, is a more serious offense than terrorism based on false
understandings of the Koran and Sharia.
Because for terrorism, the powers that be who is responsible. It is the product of
deviance because power is supposed to integrate and enlighten citizens in their
society, not push them by their exclusion from defects and obscurantism which
then switches to terrorism or crime that becomes a public danger!!! Man is not
free, it is packaged either by nature or by its own limits, either by the company
or by the laws that he created to organize his social life, or by divine will subtle
which includes, without his knowledge. Man is not free not sleeping, not eating,
not to themselves, the man is not free to run 100 kms a pace or free to fly in the
air, nor free to live alone. Man is not free to talk nonsense, if he does he will find
himself marginalized by his own company, or say stupid things in front of the
wise men, nor to be free to violate the rights of others, or Nazi thinking and bad,
then externalize his hatred and resentment, without it being handed a place, or
destroyed by negative opposing forces and the same level; as was the case of
Charlie Weekly. It was a response stupidity by greater stupidity! A balancing
divine justice that also that God does heal sometimes the evil with evil.
Regardless of the size that can be given is free, it should stop there, or the rights
of others begin. At this rate there, and in the name of freedom, Western man is
going to soon allow shitting in front of everyone outside to pee in front of
everybody, spitting in the faces of people kissing in the street, soon allow incest,
allow the marriage of a dog human woman, etc. Human civilization should rather
lead us to assert our divine privilege over all other creatures, our power
delegated by the creator of the rest of creation, our moral values than animal,
our lights of reason, our education, our culture, our accumulated knowledge of
humanity that makes the tremendous level of civilization, to live together and
development in which we live. Our humanity, should allow us to get closer, to
know, to share, to show solidarity tale evil, against Satan, to love and to
universal brotherhood. That's what being a civilized human being, this is not the
charlots Charlie -hebdo that by mocking and insulting a prophet of God, that will
help to promote peace and brotherhood in the world. They not only offended
Muslims in the world, but God and God says about it: "Those who offend God and
his messenger will be cursed in this world and the next, and dedicated to
execution shameful." Islam is universal, is insignificant in France and does not
apply to French, and therefore it should not be a French journalistic subject.
Think! It is not free, it is now codified by Arabian law and code that should not be
ignored, but at the same time is what it takes to avoid anarchy and chaos.
Without the rules of the road that is a stampede without legal codes, it will be
the jungle, without social and political organization, it will be the Apocalypse!
What is this freedom of expression that completely out of the legal framework
and even tramples the laws in force, which exceeds the fair and constructive
expression, to insult, mockery and aggression? Freedom of expression, like that,
without a view you are addressing, and what impact could cause this or that
6. insult or ridicule a caricature, or whether it is tolerated by the human ethics and
living together, or behavior civilized rather foolish or excessive libido expression,
worthy of being treated by a good psychiatrist.
Say anything, especially when we attack sacrosanct values Moreover, other
communities is not only the hatred overflows, racism and Islamophobia but clear
provocation and simple as the appropriate strength and suitable always try to
revenge. God knows justice! But man is free to make his choices in life, he can
believe in God or an atheist or devil worshiper, he is free; but this must remain
personnel in compliance with the laws of the Republic of manners and society
.We can not believe is the primary value of religion, or the beyond, nothing can
be done, and or it is decreed by the divine part of humanity will go to hell,
another in eternal paradise , we must populate the two eternal mansions of the
hereafter, except that not fan the crimes and diving society insecure, limit this
freedom particularly in the media because they affect a very important part of
society or communities in the world. Family, group, friends everything can be
allowed as long as it is restricted and in limited circles and friendly free trade.
Everyone is responsible for his actions and expressions. .Nobody should not
ignore that even the life of this world also belongs to God, he manages such a
subtle way so harmonious and absolute righteousness, that the universal balance
is guaranteed until the end of fixed term the world. God said: "In our
responsibility to lead (guide) men, to us belong the future life and the life of this
world."
The rich life, decorated and very modern, the creator allowed the Western world
to achieve through his will and in response to the will and collective intimate
desires, has crept into the parables of the verse: "Those whose ambition is
limited to the pleasures and splendor of this world, we will reward their efforts in
this same world, without depriving them of the least injustice; but they will have
in the Hereafter but the Fire, and their work on this earth will be in vain and all
they have accomplished on Earth will be worthless. "Verses 15 and 16 Surah
Hud.
Sadek Kheddache
Researcher in sociology and contemporary Islamic politics.
EX: D.G several companies
Management consultant, innovation and business development.