The document discusses criticisms of Jack Welch's management style and rules for running a business from the 1980s. It argues that Welch's focus on being number one or two in the market, maximizing short-term profits, and treating employees as resources no longer works in today's volatile business environment. Several commenters provide opinions that Welch's rules were too rigid and did not account for flexibility needed to adapt to changing markets. However, others argue that Welch's basic rules around shareholder value, efficiency, and competitiveness are still valid principles, but need to be applied differently given increased complexity and pace of business today. There is no consensus on whether Welch's approach is still relevant or if an entirely new model
Keep your team aligned and engaged. Manage tasks, create team schedules, track work time, and bill your clients from the same platform.
https://paymo.grsm.io/8kyp7xk8o7w6
Visionary companies are institutions that have a significant long-term impact and are admired within their industries. They prosper over many product life cycles and leadership generations through building a strong organization, not relying on a single great idea or leader. True visionary companies are focused on "clock building" rather than just implementing ideas - they concentrate on developing strong organizational capabilities and culture that allow them to continually evolve and succeed beyond any single product or leader. Their greatest creation is the company itself and what it stands for in serving people and society, not just profits or the ego of any individual.
Top CEOs share their views on managing an economic downturn without cutting prices, salaries, or staff. They recommend continuing to invest in innovation and employee development. Communicating openly with employees and customers is important to generate optimism. Carefully evaluating employees can identify underperformers without cutting salaries across the board. Mergers and acquisitions may provide opportunities during a downturn. The magazine issue includes articles on Arabic calligraphy and marketing work recently completed by Grow.
The best CEOs don’t just have strategies, they have Strategies of Preeminence that result in outside success. Yet most business leaders don’t have a strategy that is different from a strategy of operational excellence or haven’t thought about it long enough to know whether it’s working.
What does it take to create a Strategy of Preeminence? The 7 Secrets represents an Integrative, systematic, seven step process for rewriting your future, your organization’s future, and transforming yourself as a leader in the process. It starts with asking the leader, “Are you a strategist?” and goes on to designing an impossible future or ennobling purpose, building a strategy of preeminence, and a creating a delivery mechanism to match.
Every CEO and Founder can create a strategy of preeminence and drive explosive growth. Find out how here.
The document discusses the importance of having a clear sense of purpose or "why" (WHY) in business. It argues that people don't buy what a company does (WHAT) but why it does it. Having a clear WHY allows a company to inspire loyalty and avoid relying on short-term manipulations. It also discusses the need for consistency (HOW) between a company's stated WHY and its actions, culture, products and marketing in order to be authentic. Without a clear WHY, companies cannot differentiate themselves or maintain lasting success.
The document discusses criticisms of Jack Welch's management style and rules for running a business from the 1980s. It argues that Welch's focus on being number one or two in the market, maximizing short-term profits, and treating employees as resources no longer works in today's volatile business environment. Several commenters provide opinions that Welch's rules were too rigid and did not account for flexibility needed to adapt to changing markets. However, others argue that Welch's basic rules around shareholder value, efficiency, and competitiveness are still valid principles, but need to be applied differently given increased complexity and pace of business today. There is no consensus on whether Welch's approach is still relevant or if an entirely new model
Keep your team aligned and engaged. Manage tasks, create team schedules, track work time, and bill your clients from the same platform.
https://paymo.grsm.io/8kyp7xk8o7w6
Visionary companies are institutions that have a significant long-term impact and are admired within their industries. They prosper over many product life cycles and leadership generations through building a strong organization, not relying on a single great idea or leader. True visionary companies are focused on "clock building" rather than just implementing ideas - they concentrate on developing strong organizational capabilities and culture that allow them to continually evolve and succeed beyond any single product or leader. Their greatest creation is the company itself and what it stands for in serving people and society, not just profits or the ego of any individual.
Top CEOs share their views on managing an economic downturn without cutting prices, salaries, or staff. They recommend continuing to invest in innovation and employee development. Communicating openly with employees and customers is important to generate optimism. Carefully evaluating employees can identify underperformers without cutting salaries across the board. Mergers and acquisitions may provide opportunities during a downturn. The magazine issue includes articles on Arabic calligraphy and marketing work recently completed by Grow.
The best CEOs don’t just have strategies, they have Strategies of Preeminence that result in outside success. Yet most business leaders don’t have a strategy that is different from a strategy of operational excellence or haven’t thought about it long enough to know whether it’s working.
What does it take to create a Strategy of Preeminence? The 7 Secrets represents an Integrative, systematic, seven step process for rewriting your future, your organization’s future, and transforming yourself as a leader in the process. It starts with asking the leader, “Are you a strategist?” and goes on to designing an impossible future or ennobling purpose, building a strategy of preeminence, and a creating a delivery mechanism to match.
Every CEO and Founder can create a strategy of preeminence and drive explosive growth. Find out how here.
The document discusses the importance of having a clear sense of purpose or "why" (WHY) in business. It argues that people don't buy what a company does (WHAT) but why it does it. Having a clear WHY allows a company to inspire loyalty and avoid relying on short-term manipulations. It also discusses the need for consistency (HOW) between a company's stated WHY and its actions, culture, products and marketing in order to be authentic. Without a clear WHY, companies cannot differentiate themselves or maintain lasting success.
This document discusses five things entrepreneurs must understand to successfully build a self-managing company. It begins by describing three types of entrepreneurs: survival entrepreneurs who have replaced working for others with self-employment; lifestyle entrepreneurs focused on achieving a certain lifestyle; and achievement entrepreneurs who see growth as fun. It emphasizes that achievement entrepreneurs are best positioned to create self-managing companies. It then discusses the importance of experience, a clear vision, focusing on strengths through delegation, and a willingness to learn from mistakes. The overall message is that successfully building a self-managing company requires the right mindset and a gradual process of increasing freedom and responsibility.
The document provides advice for business owners during uncertain economic times. It recommends developing a strategic plan to strengthen the business and increase its value. Now is a good time to improve processes, gain customers from struggling competitors, and make the company more sustainable and valuable. The author advises talking to customers and suppliers to understand how to support them, and working with banks by being proactive if needing funding help. Overall business owners should take a strategic approach of continuously improving their company rather than just waiting for economic conditions to change.
The document discusses how to structure companies so that employees act like owners through creating "businesses within the business". It provides examples of companies that have done this successfully, including:
- Morning Star Foods, where workers manage themselves in peer-to-peer relationships and business units negotiate agreements like small businesses.
- Nordstrom, where salespeople have autonomy to make decisions and operate their own "stores" within the larger company.
- Rational Software, where cross-functional teams operated autonomously as stand-alone pods to serve customers.
- Semco, a Brazilian conglomerate that uses democratic management where workers have autonomy over decisions.
The document argues this "podular" structure
The Corporate Refugee Startup Guide Insights - USASBE PresentationDave Gee
The insights from these slides are intended to help first-time entrepreneurs, especially those leaving corporate, make an effective transition to the life of an entrepreneur. These are slides that were provided to a presentation to the United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
These slides provide an overview of some of the insights from world-class VCs, angel investors, IP attorneys, researchers, entrepreneurs and more. The entire content is available in my book, The Corporate Refugee Startup Guide which is available on Amazon.
If you need guidance on your startup or want insights on how to launch an accelerator program contact Dave at: dave@startupguides.io.
This document summarizes an interview between David Wright and Bill Todd, an expert in sales, marketing, and motivation. Todd discusses five foundations for business and personal success: 1) having a positive attitude, 2) being professionally persistent, 3) injecting fun into work, 4) catching coworkers doing things right, and 5) having excellent customer service. He emphasizes the importance of having a positive attitude and embracing failure. The interview also discusses how incorporating fun into the workplace can boost productivity and success, using Southwest Airlines as an example of a company that does this well.
The document provides guidance on maintaining family harmony during the succession planning process for a family business. It emphasizes the importance of open communication between all family members, including those involved in management and those who are owners. It recommends establishing regular family meetings with set agendas to discuss both business and family matters in a transparent way. This allows different views on issues like reinvesting profits or transition plans to be heard from all sides. The examples show how both a daughter running the business and her non-involved brother feel there is a lack of discussion and transparency currently. The advisor recommends the family begin holding formal meetings to improve understanding and prevent disputes over the business.
The document discusses implementing a Sales Managed Environment program to improve sales performance by providing sales managers with the necessary skills, tools, and processes to effectively coach, recruit, manage performance, and motivate sales teams. It notes that current sales managers often lack these skills and tools, leading to underperforming sales teams. Completing the Sales Managed Environment program would certify sales managers and equip them to build high-performing sales organizations through intensive coaching, testing, training, and use of proven systems and processes.
Some dreams are just too good to pass upJerry Hartman
1) Michael, a contractor with 40 years of experience, is contemplating starting a new business to mentor others after past failures. He is meeting with a friend Jay who wants to start his own business.
2) Michael is unsure how to apply modern management techniques as a small business owner. He realizes the high failure rate of remodeling businesses and wants to learn from past mistakes.
3) The document discusses that having a written business plan is essential to avoid common small business pitfalls. It provides an overview of the necessary components of an effective business plan, including market research, financial projections, and clearly defining the business concept.
This document discusses several factors that can lead to startup failure if ignored, based on the author's experience. It begins by thanking readers for their feedback and encouragement, and states the intention to provide more examples and cover additional overlooked factors. Several key points are then made: focusing on business opportunities rather than unique problems can lead to failure if the opportunity does not address real market needs; thorough research is important and ideas should not be rushed into startups; regular SWOT analysis is important for evaluating strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats; the roles of founders and employees are discussed in the startup context; hiring challenges and pressures are explored from both the startup and candidate perspectives; shortcuts and malpractices can undermine long-term success; mistakes
Management manual for a start up entrepreneur - managing teams and leading ne...Charles Pozzo di Borgo
It is a SIMPLE Down-to-Earth Working manual for an entrepreneur-to-be – from foundation to expansion (maturity= business as usual)
For different stages: Things and issues to be tackled, agreements, problem identification, critical capabilities needed in different stages, how to secure those capabilities are available, milestones and way of acting with them…
KEEP the main focus on organisational development and management practices (our course topic)
My own version of BRL (Business Readiness Level –”thermometer”)
Like a good manual – it has a structure and content pages that lead quickly to the right topic area when your customer ”holder of the manual” has a problem in their hands
This Leadership Mashup features sage advice straight from the experiences of an innovative and successful entrepreneur, G.L. Hoffman, CEO at JobDig. Hope you enjoy!
The document discusses reasons for increasing startup failure rates and identifies factors often ignored in analyzing failures. It notes the failure rate was around 90% in 2015 and is now 95%, questioning if actual reasons are ignored. Nine ignored factors are then each discussed in detail, including founders' personalities and passions, vision alignment, team composition, problem focus, and overemphasis on pedigree versus passion. Other influences like business models, revenues, pricing, expertise and industry trends are also listed. The author aims to help founders understand what it takes to succeed by connecting overlooked dots regarding failure causes.
This module examines the concept of what success looks like for each of us. It is made up of case studies which makes it a very rich source of information.
This document provides an introduction to a book about creating a profitable and sustainable business. It discusses the importance of understanding context and "why" as a business leader. Context provides meaning and clarity, allowing for aligned decision-making. Understanding the fundamental "why" of a business, beyond just the "what" and "how", gives it power and drives success. Focusing first on shared beliefs and context, rather than just operations and content, can help a business thrive even in difficult times.
This document provides a 14-step checklist and exercises to help budding entrepreneurs get started on developing their business venture. It guides them through developing their business idea, mission, target customer, and elevator pitch. The exercises are meant to help entrepreneurs understand their motivations, skills, potential partners, market needs, and first steps to get their business launched. The overall goal is to inspire and support young entrepreneurs in starting meaningful businesses.
eToro startup & mgnt 2.0 course - Class 03 value systemsEstrella Demonte
The document discusses various frameworks for determining a company's objective value, including questions about what problems the company solves and what valuable companies have yet to be built. It then examines three criteria for great companies: they must create value, be durable/permanent, and capture some of the value they create. The document also discusses challenges in valuing high-growth tech companies, where most value is realized far in the future, and the importance of considering monopoly versus perfect competition when analyzing a company's ability to capture value.
This document provides 50 tips from interviews with top Australian entrepreneurs. Some of the key advice includes: plan for difficult times by saving cash as a buffer; focus on basics like returning calls and being on time to satisfy customers; and use tough economic times as an opportunity to improve operations and learn more about your business. The tips cover a wide range of topics from managing cashflow and suppliers to hiring the right people, building an online community, and reflecting on leadership practices.
18 Secrets of super successful business ownersAndrew Lee
What is it that makes a difference in your level of success? In this presentation for the Entrepreneurs Circle Andy Lee BGA for Halifax and Huddersfield shares 18 key attitudes, beliefs and behaviours that make that difference.
Entrepreneurs are the mythic heroes of our economy. We relish retelling the stories of superstar entrepreneurs such as Steve Jobs, Biz Stone, and Debbi Fields. But are they typical? Most new businesses stay small and don’t change the world (at least, not all by themselves).
Let’s start with a 360° view of what a “typical” new business looks like, according to our research.
Mel feller illustrates the steps needed to start your business by mel fellerMel Feller
Mel Feller knows that business coaching is a process used to take a business from where it is now to where the business owner wants it to be. A business coach will assist and guide the business owner in growing their business by helping them clarify the vision of their business and how it fits in with their personal goals. Fitting the business vision in with the business owner’s personal goals is a step that is missed by most business coaches, who often only focus on the business goals. In so doing, they are omitting the goals of the business owner altogether. A great business owner seeks to understand why reaching business growth goals is important to them personally, and the impact it will have on their life. After all, the business owner ultimately determines the speed and passion in which the goal is met (if ever), and if it is not linked to the business owner’s personal dreams, goals and plans for themselves, there is no burning reason why getting to that business goal is critical. Mel Feller has created this guide to take you by systematically through how you can start a business. It covers every conceivable thing you could want to know when setting up a business, including:
5 Biggest Business Challenges Entrepreneurs Faceerickjones014
Have you ever wondered, “Why do so many entrepreneurs work so hard and are usually stressed?” Maybe you’re experiencing some of this yourself? Do you ever ask yourself, “Why is it so hard to run a business?” No success story seems to have come easy. In fact, for many entrepreneurs, life can be so challenging, sometimes it’s tempting to just get a job! Why is that the case?
This document discusses five things entrepreneurs must understand to successfully build a self-managing company. It begins by describing three types of entrepreneurs: survival entrepreneurs who have replaced working for others with self-employment; lifestyle entrepreneurs focused on achieving a certain lifestyle; and achievement entrepreneurs who see growth as fun. It emphasizes that achievement entrepreneurs are best positioned to create self-managing companies. It then discusses the importance of experience, a clear vision, focusing on strengths through delegation, and a willingness to learn from mistakes. The overall message is that successfully building a self-managing company requires the right mindset and a gradual process of increasing freedom and responsibility.
The document provides advice for business owners during uncertain economic times. It recommends developing a strategic plan to strengthen the business and increase its value. Now is a good time to improve processes, gain customers from struggling competitors, and make the company more sustainable and valuable. The author advises talking to customers and suppliers to understand how to support them, and working with banks by being proactive if needing funding help. Overall business owners should take a strategic approach of continuously improving their company rather than just waiting for economic conditions to change.
The document discusses how to structure companies so that employees act like owners through creating "businesses within the business". It provides examples of companies that have done this successfully, including:
- Morning Star Foods, where workers manage themselves in peer-to-peer relationships and business units negotiate agreements like small businesses.
- Nordstrom, where salespeople have autonomy to make decisions and operate their own "stores" within the larger company.
- Rational Software, where cross-functional teams operated autonomously as stand-alone pods to serve customers.
- Semco, a Brazilian conglomerate that uses democratic management where workers have autonomy over decisions.
The document argues this "podular" structure
The Corporate Refugee Startup Guide Insights - USASBE PresentationDave Gee
The insights from these slides are intended to help first-time entrepreneurs, especially those leaving corporate, make an effective transition to the life of an entrepreneur. These are slides that were provided to a presentation to the United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
These slides provide an overview of some of the insights from world-class VCs, angel investors, IP attorneys, researchers, entrepreneurs and more. The entire content is available in my book, The Corporate Refugee Startup Guide which is available on Amazon.
If you need guidance on your startup or want insights on how to launch an accelerator program contact Dave at: dave@startupguides.io.
This document summarizes an interview between David Wright and Bill Todd, an expert in sales, marketing, and motivation. Todd discusses five foundations for business and personal success: 1) having a positive attitude, 2) being professionally persistent, 3) injecting fun into work, 4) catching coworkers doing things right, and 5) having excellent customer service. He emphasizes the importance of having a positive attitude and embracing failure. The interview also discusses how incorporating fun into the workplace can boost productivity and success, using Southwest Airlines as an example of a company that does this well.
The document provides guidance on maintaining family harmony during the succession planning process for a family business. It emphasizes the importance of open communication between all family members, including those involved in management and those who are owners. It recommends establishing regular family meetings with set agendas to discuss both business and family matters in a transparent way. This allows different views on issues like reinvesting profits or transition plans to be heard from all sides. The examples show how both a daughter running the business and her non-involved brother feel there is a lack of discussion and transparency currently. The advisor recommends the family begin holding formal meetings to improve understanding and prevent disputes over the business.
The document discusses implementing a Sales Managed Environment program to improve sales performance by providing sales managers with the necessary skills, tools, and processes to effectively coach, recruit, manage performance, and motivate sales teams. It notes that current sales managers often lack these skills and tools, leading to underperforming sales teams. Completing the Sales Managed Environment program would certify sales managers and equip them to build high-performing sales organizations through intensive coaching, testing, training, and use of proven systems and processes.
Some dreams are just too good to pass upJerry Hartman
1) Michael, a contractor with 40 years of experience, is contemplating starting a new business to mentor others after past failures. He is meeting with a friend Jay who wants to start his own business.
2) Michael is unsure how to apply modern management techniques as a small business owner. He realizes the high failure rate of remodeling businesses and wants to learn from past mistakes.
3) The document discusses that having a written business plan is essential to avoid common small business pitfalls. It provides an overview of the necessary components of an effective business plan, including market research, financial projections, and clearly defining the business concept.
This document discusses several factors that can lead to startup failure if ignored, based on the author's experience. It begins by thanking readers for their feedback and encouragement, and states the intention to provide more examples and cover additional overlooked factors. Several key points are then made: focusing on business opportunities rather than unique problems can lead to failure if the opportunity does not address real market needs; thorough research is important and ideas should not be rushed into startups; regular SWOT analysis is important for evaluating strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats; the roles of founders and employees are discussed in the startup context; hiring challenges and pressures are explored from both the startup and candidate perspectives; shortcuts and malpractices can undermine long-term success; mistakes
Management manual for a start up entrepreneur - managing teams and leading ne...Charles Pozzo di Borgo
It is a SIMPLE Down-to-Earth Working manual for an entrepreneur-to-be – from foundation to expansion (maturity= business as usual)
For different stages: Things and issues to be tackled, agreements, problem identification, critical capabilities needed in different stages, how to secure those capabilities are available, milestones and way of acting with them…
KEEP the main focus on organisational development and management practices (our course topic)
My own version of BRL (Business Readiness Level –”thermometer”)
Like a good manual – it has a structure and content pages that lead quickly to the right topic area when your customer ”holder of the manual” has a problem in their hands
This Leadership Mashup features sage advice straight from the experiences of an innovative and successful entrepreneur, G.L. Hoffman, CEO at JobDig. Hope you enjoy!
The document discusses reasons for increasing startup failure rates and identifies factors often ignored in analyzing failures. It notes the failure rate was around 90% in 2015 and is now 95%, questioning if actual reasons are ignored. Nine ignored factors are then each discussed in detail, including founders' personalities and passions, vision alignment, team composition, problem focus, and overemphasis on pedigree versus passion. Other influences like business models, revenues, pricing, expertise and industry trends are also listed. The author aims to help founders understand what it takes to succeed by connecting overlooked dots regarding failure causes.
This module examines the concept of what success looks like for each of us. It is made up of case studies which makes it a very rich source of information.
This document provides an introduction to a book about creating a profitable and sustainable business. It discusses the importance of understanding context and "why" as a business leader. Context provides meaning and clarity, allowing for aligned decision-making. Understanding the fundamental "why" of a business, beyond just the "what" and "how", gives it power and drives success. Focusing first on shared beliefs and context, rather than just operations and content, can help a business thrive even in difficult times.
This document provides a 14-step checklist and exercises to help budding entrepreneurs get started on developing their business venture. It guides them through developing their business idea, mission, target customer, and elevator pitch. The exercises are meant to help entrepreneurs understand their motivations, skills, potential partners, market needs, and first steps to get their business launched. The overall goal is to inspire and support young entrepreneurs in starting meaningful businesses.
eToro startup & mgnt 2.0 course - Class 03 value systemsEstrella Demonte
The document discusses various frameworks for determining a company's objective value, including questions about what problems the company solves and what valuable companies have yet to be built. It then examines three criteria for great companies: they must create value, be durable/permanent, and capture some of the value they create. The document also discusses challenges in valuing high-growth tech companies, where most value is realized far in the future, and the importance of considering monopoly versus perfect competition when analyzing a company's ability to capture value.
This document provides 50 tips from interviews with top Australian entrepreneurs. Some of the key advice includes: plan for difficult times by saving cash as a buffer; focus on basics like returning calls and being on time to satisfy customers; and use tough economic times as an opportunity to improve operations and learn more about your business. The tips cover a wide range of topics from managing cashflow and suppliers to hiring the right people, building an online community, and reflecting on leadership practices.
18 Secrets of super successful business ownersAndrew Lee
What is it that makes a difference in your level of success? In this presentation for the Entrepreneurs Circle Andy Lee BGA for Halifax and Huddersfield shares 18 key attitudes, beliefs and behaviours that make that difference.
Entrepreneurs are the mythic heroes of our economy. We relish retelling the stories of superstar entrepreneurs such as Steve Jobs, Biz Stone, and Debbi Fields. But are they typical? Most new businesses stay small and don’t change the world (at least, not all by themselves).
Let’s start with a 360° view of what a “typical” new business looks like, according to our research.
Mel feller illustrates the steps needed to start your business by mel fellerMel Feller
Mel Feller knows that business coaching is a process used to take a business from where it is now to where the business owner wants it to be. A business coach will assist and guide the business owner in growing their business by helping them clarify the vision of their business and how it fits in with their personal goals. Fitting the business vision in with the business owner’s personal goals is a step that is missed by most business coaches, who often only focus on the business goals. In so doing, they are omitting the goals of the business owner altogether. A great business owner seeks to understand why reaching business growth goals is important to them personally, and the impact it will have on their life. After all, the business owner ultimately determines the speed and passion in which the goal is met (if ever), and if it is not linked to the business owner’s personal dreams, goals and plans for themselves, there is no burning reason why getting to that business goal is critical. Mel Feller has created this guide to take you by systematically through how you can start a business. It covers every conceivable thing you could want to know when setting up a business, including:
5 Biggest Business Challenges Entrepreneurs Faceerickjones014
Have you ever wondered, “Why do so many entrepreneurs work so hard and are usually stressed?” Maybe you’re experiencing some of this yourself? Do you ever ask yourself, “Why is it so hard to run a business?” No success story seems to have come easy. In fact, for many entrepreneurs, life can be so challenging, sometimes it’s tempting to just get a job! Why is that the case?
The document provides six tips for transforming an MLM business: 1) Take either a shotgun or sniper approach to prospecting, 2) Work deeply with new distributors to build from the bottom up, 3) Inspire leaders rather than control them, 4) Help new recruits sponsor others within 72 hours, 5) Accept that the first year will be difficult but it gets easier, and 6) Different leaders succeed in different ways so encourage various approaches. The tips are based on the author's 17 years of experience in MLM.
The document discusses the importance of adaptability for businesses and leaders to maintain competitive advantage. It states that many companies fail when they reach their peak because they become complacent and unable to adapt to changing markets. The author argues that the most important skill for leaders and businesses is being adaptable. Leaders must continuously work on adapting their approach, thinking, and business models to evolving customer needs. They also need to empower their teams to help drive innovation and change. Examples are given of companies like Blockbuster that failed to adapt their model and were disrupted by more adaptable competitors like Netflix. The document provides five tips for leaders to develop their own adaptability, such as listening to learn, allowing diverse voices, studying emerging trends, maintaining
This document provides an overview of reasons why someone may choose to join a multi-level marketing (MLM) company and strategies for surviving in the MLM industry. It discusses that most people in MLM operate at a loss. However, the document aims to educate people on choosing a suitable MLM opportunity and avoiding problems. It outlines common reasons for joining an MLM as making money, saving on products, meeting new people, and personal growth. The document then elaborates on each of these motivations and considerations for evaluating different MLM opportunities.
Surviving the MLM Business with Ease!.pdfblueyanky
The document provides guidance on how to survive in the multi-level marketing industry. It discusses choosing the right company by considering factors like the product background, marketing plan, team, and industry trends. It also describes different types of people who join MLMs and highlights the importance of exposure to the industry before selecting a company. The overall message is that success requires choosing a company and approach that suits one's goals and abilities.
The document provides guidance on how to survive in the multi-level marketing (MLM) industry. It discusses choosing the right MLM company by considering factors like the product background, marketing plan, team, and industry trends. It also describes different types of people who join MLMs and highlights the importance of exposure to the industry before selecting a company. The overall aim is to help readers make informed choices to successfully build an MLM business.
CEO Innovation Playbook Public Short - Idris Mootee Part OneIdris Mootee
This document is part 1 of 2 of "The CEO's Innovation Playbook" by Idris Mootee. It introduces the concept of design thinking as a new management practice that fuels innovation. It argues that many businesses are missing opportunities by over-managing and under-innovating. The document provides tips for spotting market vulnerabilities and shifts to stay ahead of competition through innovation.
The Disruptive Reader: Three Urgent Questions for B2B Marketing InnovatorsShelly Lucas
This reader is dedicated to the marketing misfits. The interrogators. Because marketers who are courageous enough to ask probing questions are the ones who transform their businesses and ignite their careers.
7 Secrets of a Strategy of Preeminencessuser82a3f2
This document outlines Robert Hargrove's concept of a "strategy of preeminence". It discusses:
1) Defining a strategy of preeminence as a focused way for a company to surpass all others in its industry or market.
2) Examples of companies that have strategies of preeminence like Google, P&G, and Chipotle.
3) Five pathways to achieving a strategy of preeminence including creating monopolies, transforming markets, improving performance, increasing efficiency, and becoming a trusted advisor.
4) The importance of empathizing with customer needs to develop a strategy of preeminence and seven secrets to creating a successful strategy outlined in the book.
Financial IntelligenceLeadership Vision Chapter 6 Lead .docxAKHIL969626
This document provides an overview of tools that organizations can use to demonstrate and promote ethical conduct. It discusses leaders setting an ethical example, citing how Johnson & Johnson handled the Tylenol crisis. It also outlines other tools like a code of ethics, code of conduct, ethics committee, ethics training, and ethics management program. The document emphasizes that taking a 360 degree view and considering multiple perspectives is important for addressing ethical dilemmas, and that business ethics involves studying moral principles within a business context.
5 factors that contribute to the success of your businessGeorge S. Ammar
The document discusses 5 key factors that contribute to business success:
1. Having an innovative business idea that offers real value to customers.
2. Assembling a talented team that shares your vision.
3. Building a strong professional network for advice and resources.
4. Being willing to work hard in the trenches.
5. Prioritizing sales from the beginning to prove viability and generate revenue.
Presentation I gave to a high-growth startup with my perspectives on high-growth companies and how to manage the challenges that come with high growth.
You can no longer count on a return to “ Normal” competitive conditions. The business world is flat, with capital & knowledge able to move anywhere instantly. Brands are losing value, regulations are increasing and competitors can come out anywhere. Filtered information, Selective hearing, Wishful thinking, Fear and Emotional over investment can all act to prevent an organization from Confronting and dealing with reality.
As a way to understand reality, the authors put a high premium on business savvy- the ability to understand the fundamentals of a business, and the connections between them. The book presents a model and process to help leaders learn business savvy to recognize the position of their business in wider external realities and to take action based on that understanding.
The document outlines the first step of the Duct Tape Marketing System - developing a strategy before tactics. It emphasizes that having a clear marketing strategy focused on the ideal client and differentiation is essential. The strategy involves narrowly defining the ideal client through understanding highly profitable and referring clients. It also involves finding ways to differentiate the business from competitors through interviews with satisfied customers to understand unique value propositions. With the right strategy in place, a business can then surround it with effective marketing tactics.
The document outlines a 7 step system for small business marketing success called the Duct Tape Marketing System. Step 3 discusses the importance of publishing educational content to build trust and educate potential customers. It recommends using a blog, social media profiles, and participating in review sites to generate helpful, trust-building content on a consistent basis. The goal is to position the business as a knowledgeable resource that potential customers will turn to for information and advice.
The Publisher has strived to be as accurate and complete as possible in the creationof this report, notwithstanding the fact that he does not warrant or represent at any timethat the contents within are accurate due to the rapidly changing nature of the Internet.
While all attempts have been made to verify information provided in this publication, thePublisher assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions, or contrary interpretation of the subject matter herein. Any perceived slights of specific persons, peoples, or organizations are unintentional.
In practical advice books, like anything else in life, there are no guarantees of incomemade. Readers are cautioned to reply on their own judgment about their individual circumstances to act accordingly.
This book is not intended for use as a source of legal, business, accounting or financial advice. All readers are advised to seek services of competent professionals in legal, business, accounting, and finance field.
You are encouraged to print this book for easy reading.
Introducing Network Marketing Survival – How to Survive in the Network Marketing Jungle. Inside this eBook, you will discover the topics about the shocking truth, why would you be choosing an MLM in the first place, types of people who are looking for opportunities, what is the MLM jungle like, exposure to the industry, the team (upline, sidelines, even the company staff), the trend of time, there is no such thing as a perfect MLM, an MLM that would suit you, being aware of the risks, getting started off the right foot and in a nutshell
My name is George Patience. I worked for four failed businesses in four years and contained in this manual are what I learned. This, is a collection on why businesses fail.
Industrial Tech SW: Category Renewal and CreationChristian Dahlen
Every industrial revolution has created a new set of categories and a new set of players.
Multiple new technologies have emerged, but Samsara and C3.ai are only two companies which have gone public so far.
Manufacturing startups constitute the largest pipeline share of unicorns and IPO candidates in the SF Bay Area, and software startups dominate in Germany.
buy old yahoo accounts buy yahoo accountsSusan Laney
As a business owner, I understand the importance of having a strong online presence and leveraging various digital platforms to reach and engage with your target audience. One often overlooked yet highly valuable asset in this regard is the humble Yahoo account. While many may perceive Yahoo as a relic of the past, the truth is that these accounts still hold immense potential for businesses of all sizes.
Understanding User Needs and Satisfying ThemAggregage
https://www.productmanagementtoday.com/frs/26903918/understanding-user-needs-and-satisfying-them
We know we want to create products which our customers find to be valuable. Whether we label it as customer-centric or product-led depends on how long we've been doing product management. There are three challenges we face when doing this. The obvious challenge is figuring out what our users need; the non-obvious challenges are in creating a shared understanding of those needs and in sensing if what we're doing is meeting those needs.
In this webinar, we won't focus on the research methods for discovering user-needs. We will focus on synthesis of the needs we discover, communication and alignment tools, and how we operationalize addressing those needs.
Industry expert Scott Sehlhorst will:
• Introduce a taxonomy for user goals with real world examples
• Present the Onion Diagram, a tool for contextualizing task-level goals
• Illustrate how customer journey maps capture activity-level and task-level goals
• Demonstrate the best approach to selection and prioritization of user-goals to address
• Highlight the crucial benchmarks, observable changes, in ensuring fulfillment of customer needs
Anny Serafina Love - Letter of Recommendation by Kellen Harkins, MS.AnnySerafinaLove
This letter, written by Kellen Harkins, Course Director at Full Sail University, commends Anny Love's exemplary performance in the Video Sharing Platforms class. It highlights her dedication, willingness to challenge herself, and exceptional skills in production, editing, and marketing across various video platforms like YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram.
Building Your Employer Brand with Social MediaLuanWise
Presented at The Global HR Summit, 6th June 2024
In this keynote, Luan Wise will provide invaluable insights to elevate your employer brand on social media platforms including LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X (formerly Twitter) and TikTok. You'll learn how compelling content can authentically showcase your company culture, values, and employee experiences to support your talent acquisition and retention objectives. Additionally, you'll understand the power of employee advocacy to amplify reach and engagement – helping to position your organization as an employer of choice in today's competitive talent landscape.
Zodiac Signs and Food Preferences_ What Your Sign Says About Your Tastemy Pandit
Know what your zodiac sign says about your taste in food! Explore how the 12 zodiac signs influence your culinary preferences with insights from MyPandit. Dive into astrology and flavors!
Event Report - SAP Sapphire 2024 Orlando - lots of innovation and old challengesHolger Mueller
Holger Mueller of Constellation Research shares his key takeaways from SAP's Sapphire confernece, held in Orlando, June 3rd till 5th 2024, in the Orange Convention Center.
Taurus Zodiac Sign: Unveiling the Traits, Dates, and Horoscope Insights of th...my Pandit
Dive into the steadfast world of the Taurus Zodiac Sign. Discover the grounded, stable, and logical nature of Taurus individuals, and explore their key personality traits, important dates, and horoscope insights. Learn how the determination and patience of the Taurus sign make them the rock-steady achievers and anchors of the zodiac.
The Evolution and Impact of OTT Platforms: A Deep Dive into the Future of Ent...ABHILASH DUTTA
This presentation provides a thorough examination of Over-the-Top (OTT) platforms, focusing on their development and substantial influence on the entertainment industry, with a particular emphasis on the Indian market.We begin with an introduction to OTT platforms, defining them as streaming services that deliver content directly over the internet, bypassing traditional broadcast channels. These platforms offer a variety of content, including movies, TV shows, and original productions, allowing users to access content on-demand across multiple devices.The historical context covers the early days of streaming, starting with Netflix's inception in 1997 as a DVD rental service and its transition to streaming in 2007. The presentation also highlights India's television journey, from the launch of Doordarshan in 1959 to the introduction of Direct-to-Home (DTH) satellite television in 2000, which expanded viewing choices and set the stage for the rise of OTT platforms like Big Flix, Ditto TV, Sony LIV, Hotstar, and Netflix. The business models of OTT platforms are explored in detail. Subscription Video on Demand (SVOD) models, exemplified by Netflix and Amazon Prime Video, offer unlimited content access for a monthly fee. Transactional Video on Demand (TVOD) models, like iTunes and Sky Box Office, allow users to pay for individual pieces of content. Advertising-Based Video on Demand (AVOD) models, such as YouTube and Facebook Watch, provide free content supported by advertisements. Hybrid models combine elements of SVOD and AVOD, offering flexibility to cater to diverse audience preferences.
Content acquisition strategies are also discussed, highlighting the dual approach of purchasing broadcasting rights for existing films and TV shows and investing in original content production. This section underscores the importance of a robust content library in attracting and retaining subscribers.The presentation addresses the challenges faced by OTT platforms, including the unpredictability of content acquisition and audience preferences. It emphasizes the difficulty of balancing content investment with returns in a competitive market, the high costs associated with marketing, and the need for continuous innovation and adaptation to stay relevant.
The impact of OTT platforms on the Bollywood film industry is significant. The competition for viewers has led to a decrease in cinema ticket sales, affecting the revenue of Bollywood films that traditionally rely on theatrical releases. Additionally, OTT platforms now pay less for film rights due to the uncertain success of films in cinemas.
Looking ahead, the future of OTT in India appears promising. The market is expected to grow by 20% annually, reaching a value of ₹1200 billion by the end of the decade. The increasing availability of affordable smartphones and internet access will drive this growth, making OTT platforms a primary source of entertainment for many viewers.
LA HUG - Video Testimonials with Chynna Morgan - June 2024Lital Barkan
Have you ever heard that user-generated content or video testimonials can take your brand to the next level? We will explore how you can effectively use video testimonials to leverage and boost your sales, content strategy, and increase your CRM data.🤯
We will dig deeper into:
1. How to capture video testimonials that convert from your audience 🎥
2. How to leverage your testimonials to boost your sales 💲
3. How you can capture more CRM data to understand your audience better through video testimonials. 📊
At Techbox Square, in Singapore, we're not just creative web designers and developers, we're the driving force behind your brand identity. Contact us today.
How MJ Global Leads the Packaging Industry.pdfMJ Global
MJ Global's success in staying ahead of the curve in the packaging industry is a testament to its dedication to innovation, sustainability, and customer-centricity. By embracing technological advancements, leading in eco-friendly solutions, collaborating with industry leaders, and adapting to evolving consumer preferences, MJ Global continues to set new standards in the packaging sector.
1. FORTUNE: Talkback
So
rry
,
Jac
k!
Te
ari
ng
up
the
Jac
k
We
lch playbook
Enough already. Corporate America needs a new playbook. The old rules of the Jack Welch era don't
work any more. Today's volatile, brutally competitive business climate demands a new set of rules
and whole new mindset.
What do you think? Is it still so critical to be Number One or Two? Is that the best way to think about
your market? Is being biggest still best? Is Six Sigma all it was cracked up to be? What do you think
it takes today to get ahead and stay ahead? What new rules would you add? -- Betsy Morris, Fortune
senior writer
Qaulity, standardization, of products is alwalys an issue....but someone needs to be a visionary and
risk taker within the organization and have the ability to sell the idea to share holder/stake
holders/senior management.
One of the typical problems I have seen within organizations is that when there is an opportunity for
growth they grow but, don 't control expenses and don't analyse why they are growing and their
competitors are not.
The entire six sigma program that Jack Welch championed was about beating your suppliers into the
ground. The result was great, short term, gain in efficiency. Now that GE has taken the profit
2. margins from their suppliers, there is no more gains for GE to get. Where are GE's great earnings
now?? They left with the short term mindset of Jack Welch.
The idea that the old rules don't apply is silly. The new rules are merely new spins on the old ones so
that some business professor somewhere can get credit for something "new" even though all he did
was spin it a different way. The rules will always apply, it's the application of them that changes. For
example, shareholder value always matters. Managers fight day in and day out to keep their jobs and
guess who decides that, the shareholders, or at least the key ones. The WAY to maximize is the
please the customer. Six Sigma was and is all about the customer. By pleasing the customer, you
increase earnings, your stock price rises. Not sure why people think that's the not the same. Agiles
is best, big is no good? Big companies definitely have the ability to be agile. They have the resources
to change what they need when they need to. GE is a huge conglomerate that is made of many much
smaller operating units. When the market changes, the unit responsible for it does. At the same
time, focusing on being number one or number two causes a company to think this way. To think
about the changes needed quickly, to focus on the customer, to look outside the business. As far as
passionate people, that is part of being the best. This thought doesn't differ from Welch's thoughts.
Jeff Immelt once said that he has worked over 100 hours a week for many years. That's passion.
Would any of you do the same? Yes, the world changes, and yes you need to be flexible, but these
rules always work, it's how you apply them that may need changing.
'add rules?' please don't! There's too much of them already.
Focus on what we don't know or really need to know, instead of describing in too many ways what
we in fact already do know about our company processes.
Ever seen the six sigma schemes? worked with them? wrong focus when China is beginning to
accelerate....
http://www.sacbee.com/business/
Mr.Welch and his principles of managing a business has arguably worked well when he was at the
helm of GE. But, I have always had my strong disaggrements to those principles and more
importantly to the business schools preaching of these principles as a 'must-be applied' by all at all
times. Mr.Welch's style and principles, such as you got to be a No 1 or 2 in the industry or the
strong/weaker players dicotomy, forces one to see business competition as 'warfare' and thus leave
out a whole series of other ways a business can be successful despite not being a No 1 or 2.
While now retired, I spent my business life (1962-2004) battling the stock-value syndrom. What
makes a company great is the enthusiasm of its employees. And what makes an employee
enthusiastic is his happiness at seeing a satisfied customer. After all, a customer sees the employee,
not the CEO! Ergo, keeping the customer happy (within limits, of course) should be THE PRIMARY
focus of any company. Take what you know or can invent, and make your customers successful by
using it.
Hopefully business leaders are not only looking at Jack Welch's business practices but also his
unethical personal life. Maybe we can learn from both.
When Jack split GE stock, 3 for 1 six years ago at approximately $180 a share, he was king of the
business world, the dot-com bubble had not burst, and everyone in the market was making money
hand or fist. Jack believed that 6-sigma was the save all for product quality and money for all GE
products, and that people were just resources and should be used up, disposed of, and replaced as
needed. He also believed that ranking people in the company 1 through 4 and rewarding them based
3. on there ranking would drive his employees to perform at the highest levels.
What Jack did not understand was that no one thing, 6-sigma, will save all but instead end up costing
the company millions in the long run, just ask Motorola who went bankrupt using 6-sigma. Product
Quality and Reliability took a beating in many GE product lines because of 6-sigma, in turn customer
satisfaction went down compared to the levels in the past. The stock prices fell sharply after the
stock split in the sunset of Jack?s stay, it dipped as low as $24 a share and has only recovered to
around $33 a share today. The worst part of it all was when Jack was paid around $100 million to
stay on one more year and finish the Honeywell acquisition. He greatly underestimated the
Europeans and the Honeywell deal was lost. Shortly after Jack handpicked Jeffery Emelt to take the
rains and left GE with a $90 million bonus and a huge retirement package that paid him so much
that when GE stockholders found out about it, because of his divorce, the board was forced to
modify the package.
GE has a man that believes in ?Jack? at the helm today. The stock is currently just over $33 a share.
Was Jack really that great or did he just make a lot of money at a time he was able?
Hype Hype Hype.... That is what business is becoming. I am starting to think that companies are
more akin to movie studios. I remember watching bloomberg quiet a bit several years back and they
had the enron people on over and over on their leader spot light or something saying how wonderful
the company is etc. LOL. Oh and my favorite book.... THINK AND GROW RICH.
When I first heard of Six Sigma and then worked in companies that followed it, I always got the
sense that it was a Draconian way of managing large companies. Sort of like taking a red hot poker
and randomly sticking it into a large mass in order to get it to dance the way you want it. In the 80's,
perhaps that's the only thing that could be done with large companies in order to get them to
change. Today we have the internet that allows small companies to act like big companies and deal
with individuals halfway around the world. It makes sense that we need new ways of managing that
are inline with how the global economy works.
Business has changed because people have changed. The blue suit, white shirt, and red tie have
given over to a need for expression and sense of accomplishment. People are looking for
opportunities to find meaning in their work. Talk to Senior Executives and you will find that they are
far more interested in a balanced approach to life than chasing a paycheck. The boomers are aging
and they are questioning (again) the "old rules".
Creating a great product, helping your customers achieve success, mentoring younger employees
and watching them grow, WHILE making a great paycheck is what drives us. Doing these things well
helps create and nuture passion which in turn helps make the business successful. If you don't....it
will show in turnover stats that will eventually lead to the demise of the organization. What was
ridiculed as "new age hocus pocus" is now a fact of life. This isn't your Father's company anymore!
The rules never change, just the ability to make more money selling a book, as Mr Welch did. It
doesn't take a brain surgeon to recognize that every decade, some high-profile people in the
business world will write a book that tries to push the idea that there is only one way to run a
successful business, and that way is to write a book and make lots of money. Even Chainsaw Al
Dunlop came out with a book highlighting his management style, which of course was to lie and
cheat and steal. Personally I don't think is a big differnce between his style and Jack Welch's, other
than Chainsaw got nailed before he could leave with a ridiculous retirement package.
Rules? There are no rules in business. Either you have what it takes to be successful or you don't.
4. Don't kid yourself into believing there is some secret formula. Those that are successful adapt to
thier enviroment, market, and have forward vision to see what is ahead. These skills can not be
taught, you are born with them. If, as a kid, you had a lemon-aide stand or tried to sell those
greeting cards from the Boys Magazine and failed, you should forget about managing a business.
Many of the new rules, opposed to Jack's old rules, just don't make sense!
1) You CAN be Agile and Big - Jack Welch taught nothing if he didn't teach and demonstrate this
with GE.
2) Who cares if you create a new niche, something new, if nobody wants it! GE Leads the world in
new innovations BECAUSE it wants to be (or remain) #1.
3) What - the customer is king so screw the shareholder? Give me a break!
4) Looking ONLY out and NEVER in is just craziness.
5) If all you did was hire passionate losers, your shareholders and customers alike would revolt!
6) The CEO should be charismatic AND courageous.
7) Admire my might? I never heard Jack Welch utter any such sentiment.
I bought a GE Microwave oven when I built my house. It's not worked for more than 3 months at any
time. I bought a new GE Microwave to replace the old one thinking something better (under Welch)
would have ensued.
The GE Microwave is sitting broke in my kitchen.
For all the GE BS I ain't buying anymore!!
I was really amazed with the comments made about Darwinism in business being questioned. We all
know by now that Darwin?s theory was discredited by the top scientists throughout the world and is
only used as reference and a simplifying tool due to a lock of a better one.
Leagues of grad students and scientists are chasing a True theory looking for fame.
You are debating that it is possible that the same is now occurring in business/ management model?
If such, I am wondering if anyone of you readers is participating to shy in this shifting paradigm. If
the fittest does not lead who does? Is it like stock market ? randomness, luckiness, following a rule
of a butterfly, meaning someone names an individual ?right?, presents it to someone with ?some
say? and that spreads or does not. Then people follow and masses of individuals decide this is The
person (the stock) since all people say he/she is. That would take us back to a very old theory
commonly referred to as ?The Emperor has no cloths?.
The CEO's of the 90's destroyed American companies because they had no vision or passion about
the business- their focus was on immediate profits to secure that BIG bonus. Exploitation in the
pursuit of immediate money was the name of that game. Whatever it took to make immediate profits,
even if it meant selling and sacrificing the capital and people was done in the pursuit of the
immediate cash goal. That stupid, short-term tactic hurt many hard-working Americans, and it hurt
5. our nations' overall competitiveness in many areas. And, incidentally, europeans, and the EU Trade
Commission rejected this tactic mainly because it is not in keeping with the long-term, strategic
business AND social goals of their community. Wow, now Americans are beginning to realize that
there's more linkage between business and social goals that Jack Welch ignored at the detriment to
America's long-term strength.
The question of our business leaders' capabilities should be 'Can they build a business empire like
Henry Ford did, not how much money can they generate in two years?' That's the true test of a
business leader!
Each of Jack Welch's rules still hold true - as these are basic fundamentals of any business
game.What has changed in today's scenario is the pace of the game and the complexity. However
the basic rules remain the same -
1. Big Dogs own the street - still holds true...they have the ability to make accquistions, take risky
projects and marketing power to introduce new products. The have the capacity to mitigate country
or product specific losses without having a huge impact on bottom line. Nimble is critical...what Jack
Welsh said about being lean and mean can be interpreted as being having the might but also being
nimble
2.Being No.1 or No.2 - Unless the thrust is to excel and rule the market, the company will only be a
follower ...the drive to be No.1 or No.2 will make the company play offensive rather than a defensive
game
3.Shareholder's value - All sucess needs to be translated into the bottom line. It is the final aim to
give the maximum return to the shareholder's dollar invested. The customer being the king is only a
means to develop better products as per customer requirements to finally increase profit and
improve shareholder;s value. The logic is simple...no company with want to meet customer needs at
the cost of reducing shareholder value.
4. Being lean and mean - Being nimble as reworded today, ability to move in and out of new products
, markets, and adapt to changing scenarios is critical to survival....nobody did this better than GE
when the started moving production and services, R&D to low cost countries before it came into
fashion in the current decade
5. Rank your players go with the A's - To be No.1 or 2, to introduce the best products, to play
offensive, one had to have the best guys on board...The poor performers would pull down
productivity and morale ...so definitely a "must leave" category. This is even more important now
when one has to be nimble and and increase customer value without increasing cost.
6. Hire a charismatic CEO - Well Jack Welsh was one of the most charismatic CEO's of his time who
influenced a whole generation during his time...and his charisma was built on real performance and
not on hollow quotes. Charisma is built on sucess, courage to tread the untrodden path and be path
breaker not a follower and Jack Welsh did all that and more.
7. Well company's soul is as important as its might..a company's social concience plays a great role
on consumer psyche and buying decisions
Fads come and go. Only Warren Buffett
has it correct: cash flow is king!!
6. Jack is still right, his playbook is sound.
It's sad to see so many workers and managers running after some mantra for business success. For
the rank and file it can be downright deppressing to have the director of their division show up one
day with six rules to total success. It is rare to meet or find a CEO or Chairman who is truly smart
and innovative. Mostly, they get to their position by a combination of luck, great ambition, and
business politics. The whole concept of the brilliant CEO seems like a carryover from US politics
itself. The Congress is afraid to make decisions, so by letting the President make them, they can
hope to get re-elected. Bad CEOs come and go, and if one gets lucky and has some success, they get
overpaid, and write books for all the people who will never get to be a CEO.
Oh please. Jack Welch = CEO during end of Nationalist Syndicalist Socialist Era of US.
GE made most of its cash of the back of taxpayers.
Welch recipe for success = corruption, Big Government liberalism largess.
There's nothing but parroting morons in financial media, business media and business school
academia who worship their sacred cows.
The new rules are dead on. The people in the trenches of large organizations have know it for years.
Lets hope the disconnected leadership of today's corporations finally listen. Hard to believe listening
to customers, motivating employess, and moving fast is ground breaking adivce - but for many large
companies it certainly is.
I have told about everyone I know that the person who writes a book about how Jack Welch has
impacted American companies would make a million. There are countless stories about how GE has
pushed companies around, mostly the midsized and smaller companies. Basically sends
manufacturing offshore - not good - Lous Dobbs would agree, I'm sure! The pressure on the GE
personnel, daily, is, in my opinion, where a leader should be rewarded. I have never been a fan of
Jack Welch's Six Sigma, other than in manufacturing processes, for efficiency. Taking it to the
companies operations just reduces the quality - companies cannot manufacture quality goods at the
absolute lowest of margins. Quality goods is what the U.S. is all about.
It is really good to see someone stepping up to address the "Jack Welch" impact on the U.S. Don't
stop now.
Old American Saying: Don't confuse brains with a bull market. Jack Welch is the classic example of
being put on a pedestal for riding the tide of a bull market. In the wake of his departue, accounting
scandal and several years of sub-par performance have resulted while the mess he left behind is
sorted through. Jack' results speak for themsleves, and the voice is pretty pathetic (not to mention
the untold costs to the environment as a result of his "could care less" policies).
Jack Welch - corparate fraud; Jack Welch is the guy everyone thinks is so smart because he's run up
the stock; however, in the 5 yrs since Welch retired, the stock went nowhere. Not because current
management isn't as good, but because Welch stuck GE with the task of unwinding majore insurance
overstatements of earning.
Article is good and right on. The representative on CNBC was poor on explaining the article.
"No one is out saying, "Let's screw this customer today, and if we do, our share price might go up 20
7. cents."
Its not said, but implied all the time by management's decisions. If a new product gets rushed to
market to increase sales (ie. Christmas and the like), it usually means a sub-standard product. There
is no benefit to the customer for this, only the shareholder.
So Sorry - Six Sigma Still Sucks!
In 1988 I escaped the telecom industry and joined Sun Microsystems. WOW! I could get more done
in a day than in a month in my prior life. Commons sense, logic, creativity, and spirit were accepted
tools for all aspects of work life and it was FUN! Customers loved it as much as the employees did
and sales reflected this.
At some point Scott(McNealy) drank the Kool-Aid offered by Jack Welch and Sun started the
downward trend.
The focus became meeting Six Sigma goals, even if reality didn't quite match the image. One of the
biggest conflicts was "player ranking" - A manager could have the top ten people in the world
working for him (in any discipline), but would be forced to "Rank" them and weed out by the
numbers.
Thanks so much for this article. Your list of New Rules really make me miss Sun in the early 1990's.
Jack Welch executed his plans like no one else. He also could put together teams of people to
administer the corporate edicts he put out, based on their particular skills and creativity. He was the
lynch-pin.Many down stream from him within GE tried, but were pale imitations. Often scuttling
good people & or divisions in the process.
I?ve worked at 3M (pre-Emelt), Honeywell (with and without 6-sigma) and GE (with 6-sigma).
Employees gave a lot of lip-service to 6-sigma, it really helped very little, just ended up being this
year?s program for the most part. The real danger to the organization I saw was what Welch?s
employee philosophy did to team work. Team work basically disappeared as the employees
developed an every man for him-self attitude. The better I look, the worse you?ll look and if one of us
has to get whacked, I want it to be you. The other thing that Welch created was, if you?re over 50
years of age, you?re a low-performer. No one but the CEO gets to retire from GE, so the best
employees leave. Creativity was stifled as people became risk-averse. Organic growth declined as a
result. Cost reduction ruled, research and investment was avoided. Customers fled and stagnation
set in. Jack Welch has been a drain on our competitiveness. He is not to be admired.
The Fortune reporter and most of the people commenting in this forum clearly don't understand Six
Sigma.
The foundation and hence the name comes from "Statistical Quality Control" concepts similar to the
well accepted ISO 9000 program initiated in Europe in the 1980-90's.
The GE program as well as many others went right down to the "individual contributor" employee.
While being #1 or 2 has to do with not pouring precious capital and manpower into marginal
businesses, it pales compared to the over-all impact of Six Sigma.
Fortune's authors and readers would be better served by more accurate and meaningful reporting
8. I was always impressed with Jack's success at GE and for the good things he accomplished I believe
he has earned great praise. However, like all good CEO's and politicians he also also managed to
avoid "paying the piper" for all the negatives "rules" he helped to popularize. More specifically:
1. Make sure to be the CEO during Bull market.
2. Blatantly use the innovations of others and when the rewards are more significant due to your
size, aggressively claim the credit. This is best demonstrated by 6-Sigma. Mr. Welch is and, by
rights, should be proud of its success. However, few realize that Motorola was the company that
coined the term and in fact was just derivative of Deming and Duran's earlier work.
3. Everyone MUST collaborate and reach consensus except the CEO. As the ultimate agent for
change, the CEO is above the need for consensus. Thus Jack was able to tell many senior executives
"My Way or the Highway". Not a terrible failing really, but so ironic I had to include it.
4. As a CEO if you don't really understand your business (e.g., your background is in accounting but
your the CEO of a automobile company), change your business to one you can comprehend. GE was
the prime example of this as during Jack's tenure it went from a world class manufacturer to a world
class finance company. This was particularly good for Jack as he continued to earned stock mulitples
associated with manufacturing firms rather than those of banks.
5. Don't manage your business for the long term, managed your earnings for the benefit of the stock
analysts. Jack was a master of putting excess into the stock plans and withdrawing the money
because they are over funded when they were needed. Review the last few years of Jack's tenure and
see how many times more money was withdrawn from the retirement plan than all of GE's remaining
manufacturing units produced in profit for the same time period. I realize this was Jack just
operating within the rules defined by our government. But the biggest sin here, was that because
Jack was such a star, everyone had to do the same thing. Suggested replacement rule: If you hit your
quarterly targets every quarter, your doing something wrong. No one is that good a forecaster, so
games are afoot to move money from one pocket to the next. There should be variability sometimes
over, sometimes under it's the trends that should be predictable and measured.
6. Wall Street and the Government don't properly measure or understand productivity, so don't
waste time on improving processes and tools. Instead dramatic results can be achieved and stock
increased by two simple expedients. Change the standard work week from 40hrs/week to
60hrs/week by reducing staff but insisting on greater output. (This is the real benefit of the firing the
bottom 10% each year, as Jack learned fear is a wonderful motivator.) If you can't increase the hours
worked then move your operations offshore while "encouraging/forcing" your suppliers to do the
same. In both cases, costs go down. Of course if anyone actually measured productivity by looking at
the total hours required to produce product across the supply chain and not just the cost of those
hours we might find productivity actually droppped. But then, this was the genius of this rule, no
actually measures it this way because the measure productivity using money spent rather than man-
hours required.
http://www.businessweek.com/
7. Implement "Darwinian" performance reviews. As mentioned above they a highly effective way to
improve productivity. The second and equally valuable benefit, is that age discrimination can be
conducted on a yearly basis. As a result, wages can be kept down and medical insurance can be
managed. The resulting loss in experience can be overcome by forcing those selected to train their
replacements.
9. 8. Insist that employees only travel coach, especially when going overseas. Without these savings,
it's not possible to afford the corporate jets required for the CEO's extensive travel schedule.
There are more such rules, but I have already taken more space than I should have. Keep in mind,
Jack has received a great deal of credit for the good things he implemented, all I ask is that he
receive credit for all of the bad things he brought to US management too.
The Jack Welch playbook works great for building a Boys-from-Brazil society of unbridled capitalism,
and apparently works best of all (materially) for the CEO. In the end, however, it lacks that key
quality our democracy and its industries need most--virtue! Does one live to work or work to live?
Jack and his philosophies ? here?s what you get with ranking people 1 ? 4? One, it?s highly
subjective, and being such, the rankings are essentially invalid (and given Jack?s penchant for six
sigma, you think he would have realized that). Two ? it can lead to a Machiavellian outlook ? I
wonder how much true teamwork happened at GE across all levels. Three ? it typically has people
focused either on trying to achieve #1 status, or building defensive posturing to validate #2 ? 4
rankings. Given this, who is focusing on providing the customers what they want, and minding the
shop? Regarding his use of Six Sigma, typically a truly well run six sigma program maximizes VOC
quality at an optimized cost, not the lowest cost (I think there is still a difference, at least there used
to be), and GE?s quality deliverables, which others have noted, weren?t the best then, and are not
now (if only the Hudson river could talk). Jack, like so many others, just happened to be at the right
place, at the right time, with the right spin, got out at the right time, and was able to engorge
himself with enormous compensation from the shareholder coffers. Was he worth the premium?
Nope. Would the company have performed approximately the same during Jack?s reign with a CEO
making one tenth of what Jack extracted for himself ? I?d take that bet? Do too many CEO?s follow
his model? Yes, as illustrated by the declining global positioning of the US industry and service
sector base over the past 10 years?
The book by Jim Collins "Good to Great" provides an excellent model for what kind of leaders that
are able to sustain performance. Jack produced great results but what type of results are being
produced by GE now? Has GE now gone from "Great to Good?" The research in "Good to Great"
speaks for itself.
Posted By Anonymous : 3:20 PM
Besides firing people in the thousands, what kind of innovtions did the famous Jack do except pad his
golden parachute and free use of the company jet?
To suggest the Jack Welch playbook should be torn up is ludicrous. The man obviously did something
right. At worst he rode on the backs of the people he hired... at best he was the visionary who
created the largest and one of the most successful companies in America. The principles he touts are
fundamental tenets of good management that business should follow. Why would you tear up the
playbook of the champion team?
Anyone who spent anytime near Jack and his boys knew all along he was a
B-minus executive with an A-plus publicity agent.
10. Well Well. It looks as if the Jack Welch boot did not work. Or did it?
Maybe it was necessary to six sigma the employees and support companies in order to get Mr. Welch
such a large bonus! At any rate, in business it works best when you achieve collaboration.
Our Rules (and they work):
1 Smart dogs don't bother with the big dogs.
2 Sell what people are buying at a profit
3 Balance the needs of your customers, company & associates
4 Continuously improve and do the "right" thing
5 Hire people who care and DWTSTWD (does what they say they would do)
6 Hire a CEO who cares and DWHSHWD (does what he says he would do)
8 Admire our ability to get you what you need.
The need for a new playbook has much more to do with the attention span of most companies'
leadership then the emergence of new set of rules for the game.
Organizations where Management:
1. Has the support and courage to understand and pay attention to good operating fundamentals
(process discipline);
2. Aggressively seeks to understand and deliver superior value to the market (customer centric) and
3. Clearly communicates to employees that they are the most valuable asset the company has and
motivates and rewards them for the right behaviors
have always and will always be at the top of their games.
These are not new ideas they just get lost in the heat of the battle over cross-purpose business goals.
There is no substitute that will fix a short attention span and management that knows its days are
numbered the moment they take on their leadership position.
It looks to me that the modern model for organizational sustainability is seriously flawed. And as
long as organizations and their management are rewarded based on quarterly performance the
search for the new silver bullet will continue.
While I can understand Fortune's desire to have such a title, in fact, the seven rules mentioned in
the article are really spins on the rule they purportedly replace.
Being big is about being agile. Being 1 or 2 in your category is all about the BCG and the experience
curve, the more often you do something the faster you do it, so the more scale you have the more
agile you are and the lower costs you have.
11. Finding a niche, or inventing one like the iPod is a way of being 1 or 2 in that product category.
Six Sigma is a customer focused program. Customers pay your bills, but it only makes sense to
invest shareholders' money in projects that involve paying customers.
Welch was always looking for acquisitions and new businesses he could dominate. But he asked for
ruthless efficiency in pursuing those businesses.
A players are generally passionate people.
Finally, the "soul" and the corporate citizen is not only not new, it is a throwback to the sort of
corporation that Welch had to fix. The kind that offers retirees benefits vastly more valuable than
that which they created when they were working (like GM) which drives hte company out of
business. In whose interest is it for GM not to build cars? Earning a good return on shareholder's
money is still the top priority of any company.
www.strategicinvestor.blogspot.com
I think the thing we got to look at now is EMPLOYEES. Companies today think to much about
customers,share holder's & the companies it self. They have got away from the people that talk to
the customer. If the EMPLOYEES that talk to your customers are not happy then how can a company
grow.Yes Jack's old rules work only if you got EMPLOYEES that are happy with the conpany they
work for.Take GE the EMPLOYEES believe in the copany and the company gave back to the
employees wich made the employee want to work hard. People today do not care about there jobs
becouse companies do not care about the people they have working. When a EMPLOYEE see a
company make a profit and do not share that with the employee,the employee say why should I give
my all and the company give 2% back. New CEO'S must unerstand customer only buy what the
EMPLOYEE sale them. WE all must keep in mind the companies nore the share holder's hold power
its the EMPLOYEE and the word of that EMPLOYEE that make a customer buy.
Here is the brake down
Company=Employees=customer=shareholder's.
Here is what we see now days
Company=shareholder=custmor=Employees.
So yes I think Jack's rule will work but only when the copanies get back to showing there employees
some love with "MONEY" not just a thank you and some cheep pin that they paid $2 for :-) lol......
There are many aspects of making a successful business, and there is no one thing (or six or seven)
that works for everybody. The problem with 6-sigma (or Jack's rules) is that they were taken literally,
and to the extreme I might add, by others who thought just by applying what Jack did at GE they
would also be successful as Jack. I still think his rules had many good and sound principles that are
still true to today, but they are not the 'savior' as many think they are. What we need to do with any
ideas is to learn and understand them, then make them your own, and finally, adopt them to your
business.
Jack's rules will never die. All new rules will be spinoffs of his doctrine. Let us not forget that GE in
1981, when he took over, looked completely different than when he retired. The ideas around being
12. agile, finding niches to grow, and looking out are what made Jack take GE into areas such as
Consumer Finance, Information Technology, etc. The very areas he saw as growth markets are one's
he attacked and dominated, but weren't originally GE's core.
If you're not trying to be #1 in your market then what are you in business to do? Dell is number one,
for different reasons as GE, but are still number one. People's values on products and services they
may buy change everyday, every year, every decade, but that's why businesses adapt (ethically)....to
remain or strive to be #1. No one ever remembers a second place finisher.
People on average are normally passionate about what their good at. Were Michael Jordan, Joe
Montana, Jerry Rice, Bill Gates, Sam Walton, and Oprah not passionate about what they did. Bottom
line..... A players aren't A players without passion. When you're good you strive to be great. That's
passion. Enough said.
Betsy Morris's article does a great job of illustrating a major problem in our society - Monday
morning quarterbacks who have access to the media but not qualifications to offer a useful opinion.
Jack Welch focused GE from top to bottom on what was then the key challenges facing GE. His
WorkOut initiative reinforced the importance of leadership/sponsorship, discipline and change
management while empowering employees to be actively engaged in improving their work. His
emphasis on deliberately managing top, middle and bottom performers with purpose was a bedrock
for GE's success and probably the reason it's produced more Fortune 500 CEO's than any five
companies. His recipe for success in the 90's was Speed, Simplicity and Self Confidence - speed
meant efficieny and responsiveness but Speed could only be derived from Simplicity - Simplicity in
turn depended on Self Confidence - he rested the success of GE on the belief that Self Confidence of
it's workforce (empowerment, risk taking, vision, candor) was the key ingredient to its' necessary
transformation. Whether your objective is increasing efficiency, driving customer satisfaction,
improving productivity, product innovation, etc - these are building blocks and always will be.
Thank you to the Fortune staff and Betsy Morris for illustrating why the quick-fixs, fads and
consultants will always be around.
You can argue Welch being right or wrong, but the reality (for now) is most major companies are
following his directions. Personally, I do not agree with Welch on many issues, but I can not deny
that his methods are being implemented blindly. You can argue about it, but eventually it?s going to
affect you ? regardless if he?s right or not.
I would think most major corporations would have the ability and talent to come up with something
better than just to follow the leader, but that is not the case. It?s even worse now, as many former
GE HR Welchbots are infiltrating the ranks of other corporations and spreading the GE way.
Are we really this lost in corporate America that we latch on to something just because ?that?s what
worked for GE??
Personalizing Welch?s effect, I worked for a major defense contractor (not GE) and was given a
review rank of a ?C? talent or non-participant or general looser slacker. I concluded, maybe Jack was
right, C players are in the wrong job and need to go elsewhere. I quit that company and went to
work for another defense contractor doing the same job for about 100K to 170K / year MORE than I
was making. Yep, the old company did me a favor and essentially forced me to go look for another
(better) job. Thanks Jack!
Even a busted clock is right twice a day.
13. You forgot that the old school CEO would cook the books for his/her bonus, whereas the new school
CEO simply back dates the stock options.
Oh, please, enough already with Jack Welch. Anybody who listens to this jerk is wasting their time. I
live in CT where GE is located and have never met a former GE employee that didn't say they hated
the company nor a current GE employee who didn't love the company. This company recruits wet-
behind the ears college kids and indoctrinates them with the idea of being worked to death is good.
Whatever you think of the company it has a tremendous turnover.Of course, Jack Welch would say
that is by design, getting rid of all but the A players. But the turnover costs the company, and affects
the bottom line.
Like any rule book in business or in warfare, Jack's Rules needs to be updated as well. Nobody in
Corporate America would ever deny that Jack Welch was a superb business manager and visionary,
and he had the results for over two decades to validate his well-earned title as a true business icon.
But times have changed and everything around us, from technology to the environment to world
politics, etc., that affect business have also changed, and so the rules have to change as well,
otherwise, you risk fighting today's "battles" with yesterday's "weapons".
TQM, 6 Sigma, Reengineering, BPO. Management-By-Fad never works.
Ever heard of the 3-legged stool model? It is really simple. Imagine your organization is a 3 legged
stool. One leg is your cutsomers, the next leg is your employees, and the thrid leg is shareholders-
owners. We need to keep these things in perspective.
I just left a major banking corporation who abused the top 10% employee ranking rule. They kept
ranking me in the bottom 10% although I was the only one out of a 1,000 people in our department
who had the specific skill. I was told I was not a team player, although I had 6 bosses in less than 3
years who were all located out of state.
Now I'm in a new position with a $20,000 increase in pay, 25 minutes from my house, and loving
every minute of it.
My former employer is now using 10 people from India to do my job.
Jack Welch's credibility as a manager was brought into question by his relationship with Suzy
Wetlaufer. Their affair cost Jack $100+ million in a divirce settlement. Anyone who pays that much
for "a good time" is suspect. Welch and Wetlaufer's subsequent marraige was likely an afterthought
to prop up Welch's reputation.
Welch's divorce made his exorbitant retirement perks from GE public record. This irked many GE
shareholders, but not as much as his angry defense of them. Finally, Welch relinquished the perks
back to GE, but the damage was done, he had cemented a new reputation for himself.
Welch was driven by urges for power, money, and sex. That was Welch's real playbook. Those forces
have driven men to greatness and ruin from the beginning of time, and will until time's end.
Firstly Darwin has not been displaced. Allowing companies the time to do research and develop new
products is crucial to long term success. The short term'Value' by bleeding a company is so
detrimental to the longterm for American Industry.
14. Six Sigma is still an excellent tool, no matter how large or how small the company, market, or issue
it is being used to solve. The use of consistant methods to solve problems helps on several fronts. It
helps employees in different locations communicate using a common language, and approach
problems with similar set of tools. It helps document solutions to problems in a consistant manner,
which can be learned from or used in solving future problems. And, it provides a databased
approach to solving problems using fundamental statistics. I'd tend to agree that most of the "Old
Rules" do not apply anymore, but I do think that Six Sigma is alive and well, and is a tool that will
continue to be essential for years to come. I also think that Six Sigma will continue to be used by not
just U.S. corporations, but by Global Corporations, where its use will grow.
These rules are not new. Sam Walton followed these "new rules" when he founded Wal-Mart.
Moreover, Peter Drucker the Dean of management teaching proposed similar rules in his
management book in 1974. Simply,we are relearning that leaders with listen skills always out
perform leaders that do not in the long run. Yes! Steve Jobs is the roll model- he listens.
New rule:
Parental Guidance and Back To Basics. Simplify Execution
V. S. Rotondi
Bravo, Fortune!
We have long since passed the time when star CEOs and the coterie of consultants and publicists
that insulate them should receive automatic obeisance.
Is being tough necessary? Sure, sometimes. Is striving for No. 1 status always bad? Hardly. Is being
big automatically evil? Not at all.
But when the primary mechanism of achieving success is through instilling fear ... of being laid off,
of risking an innovative out-of-the-box solution that could fail as easily as it could succeed, of
spending something now to save even more later ... the pendulum has swung too far and needs to be
moved back.
The Welch Way has destroyed the loyalty bond, such as it was, between senior managers and the
rest of their organizations, resulted in large numbers of laid-off employees (but active consumers)
who are disaffected with corporations, and caused innumerable decisions saving nickels and dimes
that will cost quarters and dollars to recover from later.
The issue is balance. A competent CEO needs to know when to nurture as well as when to go
neutron. As an HR consultant in China for a number of years, it's apparent to me that when the
Asian tiger fully awakes and finds its strength, significant changes are going to be forced upon
American business.
Remember: Confucian teaching, which affects hundreds of millions of employees and tens of
thousands of organizations opening up to the world, puts a good boss in almost a parental, caring
role. When bosses raised in that Asian tradition but educated in America's best business schools
compete as equals with the Welch wannabes in the coming decades, we'll yet again see dinosaurs
forced into extinction.
It's taken 20 years for American business to be driven into its current state. It will take at least 20
15. years to recover. In 20 years, Asia's new giants will be really be feeling their oats. If American
business is to succeed in that competition, the time to change management models is now.
Good start, Fortune. We need more.
I believe that who ever wrote this article is looking to create controversy or has not read his book or
heard Jack Welch speak live or
The way the new and old rules are being contrasted, is out of context and does not provide a fair
representation of what JW stands for.
JW principles are not about being big and mighty... but slow. they are about having a clear vision,
focus on your strengths (and big companies can use size as a strength) , surround yourself with the
best people and aiming to be the best. Passion, vision, focus, diferentiation and talent. Who ever
spends time with JW will realize that this is what he is about, you just need to be 5 min with him in a
room.
Jack Welch's ideas work, ask any CEO and they will agree. He has a great avility to create new
leaders who can execute and run companies, if you dont agree with this, name one single CEO who
has produced more CEOs and senior managers than Jack - he produced 3 CEos in the Dow 30, GE,
3Com, Home Depot)
I recomend readers to read JW's book or to hear him live taking about his principles on business, you
will get a very different impression on his principles.
Carlos Rohm
CEO
World Business Forum
Crohm@hsm-group.com
JW has spoken many times at the WBF and he has been rated as the most influential speaker at our
conference. Voted by more than 4,000 senior executives!
I think his principles are very much alive!
The only constant is change. The only way to truly ensure that your organization will be successful is
to recognize and understand the strategies that have worked in the past, why they worked, and most
importantly, WHEN you need to rethink them in order to effectively evaluate and select which
strategies will work in the future.
Jack Welch: Just another exhorbitantly paid CEO continuing to make money off of minimal skills.
Yes, you heard me. Minimal skills. I guarantee that for $100,000 a year, with no business school
training, I could do at least as good a job (I'm convinced I could do better) as any of the multi-million
dollar CEOs out there, in any industry. Looking good on the news or at the big corporate
shareholder meeting is one thing, but let's face it, a CEO only needs to know a little about the
business, and leave the details to a qualified staff. (picking the qualified staff is where the skill lies)
You don't need to pay gazillions for someone to do that. Email me at beacon1b@yahoo.com if you
16. would like me to run your company for a year.
Six Sigma is a joke! GE makes products that are absolute crap. We bought a house five years ago
with all "GE Profile" appliances. They have all broken several times since then. Where is the value
that should be in the appliacnes - where's the Six Sigma? It seems like the Six Sigma was effective in
introducing flaws rahter than removing defects.
This is a RIDICULOUS article. Saying that Jack's playbook doesn't work under today's economy is
like saying that Babe Ruth wouldn't be able to succeed as a baseball player in today's playing
conditions. The truth is that Jack Welch would not only adapt to today's market, but he would control
it. Under his tenure GE's stock surged over 3000%. So if Jack was still in control, he would have his
same play book plus a few tricks up his sleeve. Give the men some respect!
?Tearing up the Jack Welch playbook? is a timely suggestion since he represents the epitome of
arrogant, high control CEO?s. However, your ?new rules? are destined to join the list of
disappointing management fads unless accompanied by an alternative for hierarchical control? the
root cause of disempowered employees, organizational rigidity, poor learning, lack of creativity, and
other seemingly intractable problems. Hierarchical control is also inherently incompatible with the
expectation that employees think economically as they generate ideas for new products/services,
better serving customers, and improving company results. Fulfilling this responsibility requires that
employees have the knowledge and information to evaluate costs and benefits and the freedom to
take risks, evaluate results, and learn from mistakes. And sharing in the financial and intrinsic
rewards of business success will increase the probability that they work passionately.
Dave Packard, Herb Kelleher, Ken Iverson, and Max De Pree created such cultures by emphasizing
freedom in the workplace while building Hewlett Packard, Southwest Airlines, Nucor Steel, and
Herman Miller. Unfortunately freedom?s critical role in their successes has been consistently over-
looked or ignored by other managers, experts, and business schools. Our new book, Freedom-based
Management,? utilizes personal experiences and those of these companies to describe the principles
of freedom-oriented management, the awesome business benefits freedom produces, and a minimal
risk strategy for introducing freedom into organizations?everything needed to create an
environment within which your new rules can flourish.
What a load of crap in "Welch fires back" comparing the perfection of the scorecard in Major League
Baseball to performance evaluations in the coroporate world....there is no comparison.
In baseball you either get a hit or strike out, catch the ball or make an error, it's there for everyone
to see, right up there on the Green Monster.
Things are not quite as clear in the corporate world where depending on how well you can manipulte
and manage perceptions is key to sucess. Especially those corporations that use Jack's axe therory.
When people are treated as chattel, others take notice and take evasive action. Low or no risk
decisions, restricted communication, isolationist behavior. In addition to this many of the people
axed using this theory are only scapegoats or have been framed to cover someone elses failures...it's
a slippery slope...and creates toxic cultures.
Thanks for your cover story in the July 24th issue of Fortune, ?Sorry, Jack!? It will provide much
fodder for discussion in my MBA classes, but I think the article got it wrong. I do not believe that the
fundamental laws of economics and capitalism underlying many of Jack Welch?s rules have been
repealed. Economies of scale, efficient production and deployment of capital still matter.
17. Management techniques such as Six-sigma and differentiation of employee performance are not
mutually exclusive with innovation, flexibility and customer service. The real problem is with
managers blindly looking to mimic these techniques and achieve stellar results without considering
specific cultural and situational aspects. When things don?t work out, they blame the technique and
look for the latest management fad. It just doesn?t work that way. Jack Welch?s real key to success
and his legacy at GE was creating a culture that learned how to apply the appropriate techniques
and adapt to an ever changing world within a set of universal and timeless business principles.
Raymond P. Sarnacki
Adjunct Professor of Management
Erivan K. Haub School of Business
St. Joseph?s University
Philadelphia, PA
I think Jack Welch is missing something very critical that was pointed out in the article.
You can't have leaders without followers. If you get rid of all the followers, all you have left are
leaders with no one to lead.
Jack Welch's policies have destroyed the leader / follower relationships.
Something else to consider. Not everyone wants to be a leader or has the ability to be a leader. That
doesn't mean they can't be a loyal, hard-working contributor to the organization. These are the types
that are being weeded out of GE.
Six Sigma is a very old concept. It is a methodology to reduce defects on the production line in
manufacturing. Now banks are applying this concept. I'm thinking that this concept doesn't translate
100% into other types of organizations and unintended consequences are the result.
Jack is long gone....and GE no longer plays by those rules. Anybody can turn a profit by buying and
bleeding and at the same time cheating on their spouse. It takes real leadership to drive growth by
investing in technology, creating a world calss sales force and delvering on fullfillment....Immelt vs
Welch, two different styles and I would take Immelt over Welch anyday.
Get real, Fortune. For such a great magazine with a distinguished legacy, your coverage on this
topic is disappointing. You take Welch's rules out of context, boiling them down to soundbites, and
then find a few CEO's who are looking to build their own legacies and have the audacity to fall into
your trap of gross oversimplification. Remember what Jim Collins taught us: The Genius of And. Be
big and nimble. Serve shareholders and customers. And so on.
"Tearing up Jack Welch's Playbook, Sorry Jack, the new business rules"...Boy!!!
The way Fortune has publicized and highlighted Jack Welch's successes only to tear them apart and
show their new rules looks more like taking an approach to hilight your cause or agenda by utilizing
the popularity of a great CEO. I guess just highlighting as "Fortune's new business rules" would not
have worked Vs. tearing apart the successfull Jack Welch. What a way to discount a legendary CEO's
rules to forward Fortune advertising.
18. Jack Welch's tenets of management are fundamentals, nothing more and nothing less. Any business
that does not practice the fundamentals and seek to improve execution of the basics will fail or at
best languish in mediocrity. Jack is a fierce competitor and master of leading through volatility.
Following his lead should be embraced more than ever in today's environment. Betsy Morris should
write fiction because her grasp of management and leadership shows incompetence nor does she
have a track record on which to perch. Perhaps she could write about innovating a new wheel and
how to be last to market.
Interesting that you would run an article trashing Jack's style, considering he has an exclusive deal
with Newsweek, and won't give fortuen the time of day.
Welsh?s strategies don?t even achieve their own shareholder values anymore .Between 2001 and
2006 if you bought 100 shares each of the following large prestige leading companies: Coca-Cola,
Citygroup, Dell, Exxon-Mobil, G.M., G.E., and I.BM. , Disney, 3M, Johnson & Johnson, Microsoft,
Wal-Mart, Pfizer and Proctor & Gamble, you would have invested about $50,000 and lost about
$5000... The conclusion is unmistakable: ?Bigger is not better.?
What Welsh and others ignore is that the most limiting factor of bigness is its devastating impact on
culture, structure, passion and creativity. The bigness of organizations causes defensiveness,
uncertainty and structures that inhibit today?s necessary behaviors. The success of smaller more
innovative companies leads to the conclusion that many organizations should simply get smaller in
order to really deal with today?s environment. Splitting up organizations, spinning off or creating
more independence among groups, are what is being necessary to maximize the potential of both
individuals and corporations.
Enough already. Corporate America needs a new playbook. The old rules of the Jack Welch era don't
work any more. Today's volatile, brutally competitive business climate demands a new set of rules
and whole new mindset.
What do you think? Is it still so critical to be Number One or Two? Is that the best way to think about
your market? Is being biggest still best? Is Six Sigma all it was cracked up to be? What do you think
it takes today to get ahead and stay ahead? What new rules would you add? -- Betsy Morris, Fortune
senior writer
I dont know very well Jack Welch and his management ideas. I dont read a lot of management books.
They are boring. They miss few things that are important for a CEO.
1. It is true that it is more brutal competition in any market. But we forget to mention here why this?
The answer is very simple: in this age with the computer power, conductivity and transmission of
data, and connection, it is very easy and inexpensive to jump in any market and become a player.
2. To do that you have to be unbiased, "pure", not indoctrinated by academia, genuine thinker. An
example: outsourcing. Good idea because of lower labor cost overseas? Wrong. It might not be bad
but it is good and winning idea for sure. Toyota, 20 years ago opened its first plant in USA, in the
country where the labor is among the most expensive in the world. Today Toyota is almost
bankrupting the aotumotor giants like GM. this leads me to the next point: what did make Toyota so
successful? The quality of products.
3. Quality management is the core of management in general. You improve the quality you are on
your way to become a winner. How does quality get improved? By process reengineering. Americans
are a little bit slow in getting it. Half a century ago, one of the fathers of quality improvement
19. theory, Deming, had to go half away around the globe to implement his ideas, in Japan that was
known at that time for the worst quality products in the world. Toyota today is proving that quality
does matter. When they built the plan here the only thing that impresed the folks here was the fact
that they did not have a parking space for cars that would need rework? Go figure.
4. and equally important if nt the most important assets for a manager is the vision.
3.
If a company doesn't put the customer first, pretty soon there won't be any customers. They pay the
bills!
The thing I find interesting is the notion that the "score" in business is the share price. This has only
been true since the late 80's, before that, shares were literally shares in a profit-making enterprise
and thus shares of the profit. So, in the first 300 years of capitalism, profit was the "score" in
business as that was the purpose of a corporation, to invest together and create profit to pay
dividends to the investors. Jack Welch's new rules were about this change from corporations as
shared profit-making enterprises to corporations as entities to create speculative bubbles in mostly
phony equity documents. he was acknowleging officially that American corporations were now all in
the same business, the business of selling equity documents to investors. For example, bigger is
better because your "brand name" for your stock is more visible, hence attracting more investors to
your bubble in cumulative effect. Being "No 1 or 2" is good because it has media and press value,
and will attract investors who hear your name as a positive, or winner. Etc. Jack Welch's rules are
rules for the manipulation of investors. Investors haven't changed much, and the stock markets are
still vastly inflated, so these rules still hold.
The change will come suddenly, it will be a general collapse of the speculative stock industry,
probably right as the baby boomers retire. As their share prices collapse, as 100 million people all
try to sell off their prized "investment" pieces of paper with very few buyers, dividends will be again
the only reason people buy stock. Then the rules will shift to favor actual profits and a sound
business strategy. But not until then.
Around 2015? Say 10 years from now?
Fortune hit the nail on the head with this one. Business' fundamental role in society is to make
money. However, as society has changed and demands of stakeholders (those to whom the business'
success is linked) are changing due to globalization and the information age. Companies can no
longer hide behind off-shoring and shell corporations. They must 'stand and deliver' or face
customer revolt, community opposition, regulatory constraints, and employee defections or reduced
productivity.
The notion of the responsible corporate citizen in the US includes heatlh insurance and pensions.
Around the world it is transforming to include responsible environmental stewardship, and respect
for local cultures and ways of life, etc.
You can lead without dominating and the successful business strategy will always be the one that
allows for maximum profit within the accepted norms. Jack Welch's profits at GE came at the
expense of pollution in the Hudson River (for example) that was allowed in an era of laissez-faire
regulation. The communities, employees and shareholders are still bearing the burden of that
decision. Defining what is successful requires a long term view, not juding quarter by quarter
balance sheets.
20. Betsy Morris is right on target with the new rules and pointing out the significant flaws that are
becoming evident in the Jack Welch model. Agility, Innovation, "Outward" focus, and finding and
developing "passionate" people are all powerful elements of a model that will win with "staying
power" over the "Welch model".
I've watched, first hand, the GE/Welch model turn what was once a great company, into one with
short-sighted vision, dimished employee and customer loyalty and now struggling to gain the market
share they desire and could once command.
Thankfully, I chose to make a change to lead in a company that exhibits the "new model" and is now
taking "high performing" people, customers and overall market share from my "GE/Welch" inspired
former employer.
To Fortune,
In baseball it's wins and losses. In business it's market share. Everything else is excuses, smoke and
mirrors. The Japanese (Nissan) I worked for said "if you're third you're dead." They died. Look what
Carlos is doing for them. Do you not think that more market share would help GM? It is all about
product appeal!
I agree with the changes, as world is changing, technology is changing and preferences of each one
us is changing every day. What Jack Welch wrote three years back was based on his understanding
of the market; however it seems that he did not consider a rapid changes in the business
environment / practices. Hence, it is important for all of us to understand, what are rules today may
not remain tomorrow, and therefore, we all need to be on constant change; these rules may be old
tomorrow and who knows Jack's rule will be applicable again!!!
Sustainable business depends upon doing the right thing for the right reasons. If you value
proposition is a zero sum proposition, I win someone else must lose, is not sustainable. Let the buyer
beware will not stand. Our value proposition is that we not only sell the customer what they ask for
we sell them what will make them successful. That means we need to know their intentions and meet
or exceed those expectations.
What I found most interesting is that the seven new rules identified as being keys to success for
corporate America are essentially the attributes of an entrepreneur and his/her venture. As director
of entrepreneurial studies at Bentley Collge (Waltham, MA) as well as a practicing entrepreneur, it
really is no surprise that given the emphasis on innovation and growth, corporations need to
embrace the entrepreneial mindset, skillset, and toolset to achieve success. It's really that simple
and that complex.
Welsh's business practices were always flawed and will always be flawed. His business philosophies
have lead to a soulless business environment that allows business to post profits right up to the day
they have to file bankruptcy!
The simplistic interpretation of Jack Welch's rules and the proposal of an equally simplistic new set
of rules serve to perpetuate the destructive cycles of management fads. Unfortunately, a company's
successful use of a management technique is too often packaged, popularized, and then misapplied
by consultants and educators who offer it as a panacea to management all too eager to find a
panacea. The na?ve application of the fad techniques inevitably produces poor results. Thus the
technique falls into disfavor. This is followed by the wise sages of the business press, management
consulting, and education then denigrating the techniques they promoted 5-10 years earlier while
21. promoting the next panacea.
The focus on the fad management techniques vs. the CEO lets the CEOs off way too easy. It is time
we quit blaming management techniques and look in greater depth at what constitutes sound
management. For example, I hope the CEOs who adopted six-sigma and failed to produce the
expected results were held accountable for their lack of understanding of six-sigma and its
application to their context. Tools work when properly applied.
The fact that "everything Welch said became gospel - often to the extreme" is not Welch's fault. It is
the fault of the CEOs who did not do their homework to understand what the unique needs of their
own businesses were and naively deployed Welch's methods. Also at fault are the consultants more
than willing to sell these CEOs popular, vs. effective, solutions. This cycle of management technique
popularization, misapplication, denigration, and new fad technique adoption does not bode well for
truly advancing the art and science of management.
Welch was neither a god nor a demon as some portrait him, but he obviously achieved great things.
Bull market or not, GE thrived from 1980 to 2000 while its comparable competitor, Westinghouse,
did not. Many other established U.S. companies fell from grace during this time as well.
In regards to some of the old and new rules ?
Agile is best; being big can bite you - Maybe this new rule vs. old rule should be the rule "good
strategy and good management is best; not even size will save you from poor strategy and poor
management." If you are agile you are better off whether big or small. GM has not fallen from grace
because it is big, just as no one is recommending that Toyota downsize to be more agile and
competitive. Certainly both physical and social technologies evolution continually change the
winning business model solutions. If everyone runs from "scale" to "agility", in a few years the
business articles will be bemoaning how those focused on "agility" are out of touch while some other
neglected dimension of the business model rises up to gain attention and favor
Find a niche, create something new vs. Be No. 1 or No. 2 in your market ? Part of the art of
management is defining your market. If you create something new, you are by definition number one
and have the freedom of the number one player in the market. If you are number three or four in
head to head competition with the rest of the industry, the market is telling you your solution is less
valuable than others. In that case, isn't it the CEOs' fiduciary responsibility to redeploy the assets to
a better use that generates more value? Also, don't executives know that they must continually
create something new and that every new investment made cannot be expected to move the needle
in a large business? After all, in 1980, Wal-Mart was a small company and Dell did not exist yet, but
they were new creations which came to dominate their markets.
Customer is king vs. Shareholders rule ? Last I knew it was the customers who provide the revenue
which drives the cash flow, earnings, and stockholder value. Any executive not focusing on the
customer is shortchanging the shareholder. If the only reason for share price growth is due to
earnings manipulation, share buybacks, and acquisitions which do not create value, it is time for the
shareholder to bail out and the board to replace the CEO. It is also time for the board to take a hard
look at incentives in the CEO's compensation package to see if they are aligned with producing value
from the customer's perspective.
Hire a courageous CEO vs. Hire a charismatic CEO ? Does this infer that Jack Welch or Lou Gerstner
were not courageous? I don't buy it. But the focus of this juxtaposition seems to be on a longer term
focus and organic growth vs. operational optimization and acquisition. The facts tell us that a longer
22. term focus and organic growth is the path to creating the greatest value. It seems to me that is a lot
of what Welch and Gerstner did in their respective companies by moving them into higher value
offerings and out of commodities.
The Power of Positive Engagement, as defined in this article by Darcy Rezac, Author of Work the
Pond! (Prentice Hall 2005) and Sauder School of Business Dean UBC, Daniel F. Muzyka. it is all
about the need to creat social capital for benefit of all: customers, employees, communities &
shareholders. The Johnson & Johnson credo--first published in 1942!
http://www.boardoftrade.com/vbot_sb_archive.asp?pageID=179&IssueID=140&ArticleID=2372&yea
r=2006&sbPage=AD
Jack was a leader who beleived in scaring his employees and overworking his employees to death.
Most of the e band execeutives in GE are either single or divorced. Most of the folks who left GE are
happy and doing well. Being a GE supplier is like a ride to hell and being a GE customer means that
GE makes 21 ROI of you.
Enough, already. Jack was right and so is Betsy Morris.
Johnson & Johnson, way back in '42 in their famous 'Credo' identified 4 'Kings.' The customer, the
employee who serves the customer, communities in which we operate...and fourthly, the
shareholder.
I prefer to think of the customer as the 'king-maker' and the other three as kings.
Jack Welch's playbook is still very relevant. People get carried away with new ways of doing business
- dot.com's for example. There is nothing wrong with adopting new thinking and better approaches.
But you never ever discard the playbook that got you where you are if you've been a successful
enterprise. You take what has worked best for you and you adapt it and integrate it with any new
plays that you feel will help execute in whatever direction you want to take your enterprise. Jeff
Immelt isn't going to discard the rules by which he's grown and achieved great personal success but
he might change the focus of the organisation. The things that made GE successful will still work
today; maybe without the same growth rate that they achieved over 20 years under Welch, which is
what Immelt's challenge is and he's meeting that head on. You can bet your life that GE is still going
to succeed and grow using much of the old plays combined with some new ones.
I sent the "Sorry, Jack!" article to a friend of mine who still works at the large company where I used
to work (I was ranked and yanked 1 1/2 years ago). Below is his response...so sad. Open your eyes
corporate leaders of America!
"Still here. Got ranked as a two again, but was given a warning and a lot of BS. I was actually told
that what I do, day in and day out of resolving issues and problems really was not as important as
getting upper management to notice me, doing charts and graphs to show what I have done and
saved the company, doing CPMS on time etc. But yet, they keep me covered up with issues to
resolve. This next ranking results may be somewhat different for me. It really makes you want to dig
deep and work real hard. Yea Right!!"
HThe problem with articles like this is they are "either - or";
there are different rules at different stages of the game, and for different companies.
23. The other problem with the article is it perpetuates the fawning over Jack
Welch, who is not the best CEO GE ever had. He was a good CEO, but I don't think a great one.
I like the article though - provokes a few brain cells.
thnx
The difference between GE and Toyota (who gains share every year), is your "new rule" number 3
(customers) is rule number 1 for Toyota. Jack's "cost out" mentality made GE an internally focused
organization. Ask any GE vendor who is running GE and they will tell you the truth, the finance folks,
risk, purchasing, contracts, cost out, no time to think or plan, do more for less, confuse activity for
progress, no time for tomorrow, today is the only thing that matters. Jack made shareholders "king"
and todays shareholders are paying the price. Jeff Immelt has the hardest job anywhere, trying to
get GE to change from cost-out to customer is going to be interesting to watch.
One of the stakeholders that gets squeezed more and more, are the employees. Top managers are
getting ever more exagerated salaries and bonuses and shares, whereas the ones who deliver the
goods, the amployees, are asked to agree to lower salries, less reitrement behefits, less health
benefits etc.
Only satisfied employees yield satisfied (and profitable) customers.
Oh great.
America has given-up its best industrial and scientific technology to China in recent years. The most-
skilled engineers have been off-loaded to satisfy the cult of offshoring (predominantly to China &
India)and now, just when shareholders and CEO's should be able to sit back and comfortably
observe the wasteland they have created, folk start questioning the viability of the King of Short-
Termism; Jack Welch.
Yet in his heyday, the likes of Fortune magazine were quite willing to trumpet GE and Welch as "a
good thing".
Now the US is being sand-bagged by China and India (a country GE has helped to prosper
considerably) and the recriminations are beginning.
Welch did what he did to satisfy both Wall Street and the cult of short-termism that has engulfed US
firms for the last decade. Until shareholders demand that CEO's are able to make long-term
strategic decisions (and don't get fired for a bad quarter, or rendered rich beyond their dreams for a
good one) then the situation will persist. US firms have given-up all of the family silver (the secrets
and the best staff) only the drapes are left.
There is no zero sum game, you can be innovative and do lean six sigma. There are consulting
companies out there now who consider them complementary and have highly developed practices
for each. It is all about continuous improvement, by the most appropriate means.
If you think about Six Sigma, it is all about doing stuff you should be doing anyway. We should
manage with data, we should involve our customers and we should work as teams. What is
undesirable about that? Where things tend to break down is that Six Sigma is prescriptive and it
requires a lot of effort. Most CEO's don't have the energy to start six sigma, have it show them that
24. they have no effective method of operationalizing their strategy, don't have any data collection
systems worth a darn, etc. and then take all those things on in turn. LSS isn't designed to fix those
things, but will make them obvious.
The rules of business probably don't change much, trends do. The CEO who makes the news does so
because he/she is successful at the moment and is not publicity adverse. Their personality tends to
make them lead in a certain way, so everyone thinks that is the way to go. In other words it is the
times who make the man.
I will never forgive Walmart for what they did to the workers at the Jonquiere store in Quebec. They
closed the store because they exercised their legal right in Canada to form a union.
They can go green till their store front ends looks like a golf tee off.
I will never shop one of their stores again.
I must say that I found the article "Sorry, Jack!" to be very interesting. I believe that Warren Buffett
would agree with the new rule: hire a courageous CEO. I also found it quite humorous that the
article de-emphasized the importance of size and being the "big-dog", yet was immediately followed
by the Fortune Global 500 article chronicling the largest global companies. Thank you for the fine
article and the humorous placement (seriously).
Jack Welch is the worst enemy of the the American Middle-Class working person....and therefore,
America. He has killed more American cities and ruined more Americans lives than terrorists ever
will. Jack Welch is the reason our founding fathers did not grant rights to or even allow the forming
of corporations except in very specific and limited cirmunstances.
Jack Welch's management syle was great. he did to GE what needed to be done, like move it from
the hierarchial structure and "big companies rule" of the mid 1900's. he changed and made GE
successful, now jeff immelt is changing what he feels will help GE be successful in the future. 6
sigma or nothing, these are just management process. when the customer changes, you do too.
The old rule propounded by jack welch some years ago could be accepted during the analogue
period,however the digital era drives the new rules in managing Mega corporations.change as a
management tool determines whatever rules that is in vogue.In other words I will term it as :Time
Value of management concepts
The Rules of Business have changed significantly with the changes in society. Globalization means
the world is interconnected, the key is to utilize that. To be a success you need to network and
understand cultures of the world.
To truly be a succesful manager/ceo in business one needs to connect and understand cultures not
like our own.
Jack Welch and General Motors havent really done that. An example of cross cultural understanding
could be found with someone like 'Coca Cola'
Jack Welch's rules in their current state can not survive in today's information world.They were good
back then and still some are applicable with a little tweaking.Some of the rules create fear and stifle
creativity.Business is still about people,and people skills are still relevant today more than ever.
25. Business Environment is always in constant state of flux. Every decade witnesses a shift in principles
and priorities. What we think is the ultimate rule just becomes a fad in the upcoming decade.
Take the case of what Einstein's model did to the Newton model.
On Jack - Hopefully, MIT will get smart and fire the TURKEY when it realizes that he is just selling
his WARPED CEO opinions. Wonder how he grades the kids papers. Hope they don't take hime too
seriously!
My graduate management professor sent me this article on Jack Welch. Welch largely built GE
profits from GE Capital. We have a done a good job on building a consumer economy based on
readily available credit, hence the success of the finance sector. The only question is how are
consumers going to be able to continue to spend once the bill for all the credit comes due. You can
create great products or great services - but you still need consumers. Right now China is willing to
finance our consumption binge. What happens when they are no longer willing to do this? Economics
teaches us that that there are two things we can do with income - save or consume. At the moment
we are consuming. If we consume and do not invest, then in the long run we will be less
economically productive. This is one challenge no leader, business or political, seems to be willing to
tackle.
I know Jack, and I know GE. Obviously a great man of his time, but times change and a great man, a
great company, changes with it.
The key to being a successful company is not striving to be No 1 or No 2 or increasing shareholder
value -- they are consequences. I agree that the key is creating a product or service that the
customer wants and with which they are satisfied. Better yet, exceeding that level of satisfaction is
the goal.
To get to that goal of customer satisfaction, the employees have to buy-in to it. They are the ones
who imagine the product. They are the ones who design, build, test, and market that product. To
keep them producing, they must be treated with respect and admiration, much like their boss. They
should be valued and rewarded. They should be treated like they matter.
Rank and yank is a siege mentality. After the siege is over, rank and yank can not continue without
the company creating self-inflicting wounds. Hire the best. Treat them with respect. Reward them
when the company does well.
To get to that goal of creating a product that the customer wants, a company must treat its
employees with respect and integrity along the way, rewarding them in the same manner (not
necessarily the same degree) as they do their most prized executives. If the boss gets a competitive
salary, the chief bottle washer gets a competitive wage. If the boss gets a bonus, the chief bottle
washer should get a bonus.
At the risk of adding to your rule book, here are the basic rules from which all others evolve (ps,
Darwin was never discredited!):
1. Customer happiness is the goal. The product is the means. Shareholder value is the consequence.
2. Keep your employees happy. They will make your customers happy.
Previous comment -- forgot "State"!
26. As a new GE employee having worked for numerous large and small companies as a reference, I can
honestly say that the culture is good (upbeat and positive), but the innovation and everything else is
lacking.
The major issue is the behemoth that is so slow and full of itself, it can't get anything done. Nimble is
the opposite of GE today. It is full of too many managers who don't know what is going on and do not
know how to get things done, other than to call someone else to do it. Partly due to the wide
movement qorund the company, depending on good management, rather than knowledge and
experiance.
Numerous layers of bureaucracy, full of all sorts of C players (or worse) from numerous countries (to
tear down American salaries)that can't even converse in English. The reason there are so many C
players is that no one person can get the job done. They don't have the tools, knowledge or both.
Just think, how long it takes to call others to get your job done and wait for them to complete a
complex chain of events. What takes hours or days at other companies, requires weeks or months at
GE.
GE's innovation is shut down by its own EHS system. They are so safe, it is a wonder that they are
still allowed to use computers and drive cars.
Finally, too many groups doing the same thing without any contact between them. Several wheels
are re-invented and the customers are completely perplexed.
Now they claim that they are practicing LEAN. As mentioned before, they ship it offshore and
increase their WIP by 10-20X, the exact opposite of a LEAN supply chain. Then they say that they
don't pay until they take possession. Again, the opposite of LEAN as they have thousands of WIP
product lines with possible scrap in the pipeline and increasing lead time by weeks and months. If
your supply chain isn't lean, then everything else isnt lean either, never will be.
Eventually, GE will not manufacture anything as they continue to lose their key employees and
continue to sell off businesses. Then when the financial industry crashes, they will cease to exist like
so many others. The house of cards that Jack built, destined to fail.
Management itself is the problem. Compare the way "managed economies" operate to the way
managed companies operate and see if you notice any significant differences. Now look at the well-
being of managed countries compared to that of countries with relatively free economies. Imagine
the improvement we'd see if we could replace "management" with something akin to "freedom." If
you're interested in finding out more, see http://tinyurl.com/yanqmm.
i honestly think no one gets it. why the obsession (fortune is a big culprit here) with rules. you win
by doing whatever it takes (legally and ethically) to win.
i think the value is in learning from what jack did versus whose rules are correct. he understood the
game, figured out how to win and then did it.
you want to win - find out what winning means, what it takes to win, organize your resources and
then go win. everyone knows this and nonsensical obsession about rules isnt going to do anything for
you.
It took Michelangelo about 6 years to paint the Sistine Chapel Ceiling giving the world a work of art
27. that has enthralled mankind for 500 years. If he had done it using Six Sigma techniques, he would
have outsourced the work to 24 Indian house painters who would have painted it in 6 weeks with
rollers and ended up with a beige warehouse.
Look at GE's record, starting April Fool's Day 1981 when Welch took over. The next five years --
PROFITS went UP, while SALES went DOWN. Reason: Welch got rid of 150,000 hard-working GE
employees.
ANY IDIOT can make a company look good by laying people off. It takes a REAL LEADER to make
one go in tough times. Welch's rules for shareholder focus were instituted for one reason: because
Welch wanted to be CHIEF SHAREHOLDER. America needs to institute some new rules, to force
primadonnas like Welch to keep from ruining American jobs, while they pave their driveways with
gold.
http://money.cnn.com/blogs/talkback/2006/07/sorry-jack.html