April 27, 2018
With over 70 million Baby Boomers retiring, elder financial exploitation has been labeled the “Crime of the 21st Century.” In this half-day event, we will explore the neuroscience, psychology, and legal doctrine of financial decision-making in older adults. How does the aging brain make financial decisions, and when is it uniquely susceptible? How can courts best use science to improve their adjudication of disputes over “competency”, “capacity”, and “undue influence”? Is novel neuroimaging evidence of dementia ready for courtroom use? This conference brought together experts in medicine, science, and law to explore these important questions and chart a path forward for dementia and the law.
For more information, visit our website at: http://petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/events/details/our-aging-brains
April 27, 2018
With over 70 million Baby Boomers retiring, elder financial exploitation has been labeled the “Crime of the 21st Century.” In this half-day event, we will explore the neuroscience, psychology, and legal doctrine of financial decision-making in older adults. How does the aging brain make financial decisions, and when is it uniquely susceptible? How can courts best use science to improve their adjudication of disputes over “competency”, “capacity”, and “undue influence”? Is novel neuroimaging evidence of dementia ready for courtroom use? This conference brought together experts in medicine, science, and law to explore these important questions and chart a path forward for dementia and the law.
For more information, visit our website at: http://petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/events/details/our-aging-brains
This presentation explores whether SORNA laws are making us safer, 2) examines the negative effects on sex offenders, family and friends, and 3) takes a cursory look at the constitutionality of the laws.
PART TWENTY-SEVENCONSENSUS AND CONFORMITYMARITAL STATUS .docxdanhaley45372
PART TWENTY-SEVEN
CONSENSUS AND CONFORMITY
MARITAL STATUS AND SEXUAL OUTLET
Among the social factors affecting sexual activity, marital status is the one that would seem most likely to influence both
the frequencies and the sources of the individual’s outlet. The data, however, need detailed analyses.
Social and Legal Limitations
In Social and religious philosophies, there have been two antagonistic interpretations of sex. There have been
cultures and religions which have inclined to the hedonistic doctrine that sexual activity is justifiable for its immediate and
pleasurable return; and there have been cultures and religions which accept sex primarily as the necessary means of pro-
creation, to be enjoyed only in marriage, and then only if reproduction is the goal of the act. The Hebrews were among the
Asiatics who held this ascetic approach to sex; and Christian sexual philosophy and English-American sex law is largely
built around these Hebraic interpretations, around Greek ascetic philosophies, and around the asceticism of some of the
Roman cults (Angus 1925, May 1931).
A third possible interpretation of sex as a normal biologic function, acceptable in whatever form it is manifested,
has hardly figured in either general or scientific discussions. By English and American standards, such an attitude is con-
sidered primitive, materialistic or animalistic, and beneath the dignity of a civilized and educated people. Freud has con-
tributed more than the biologists toward an adoption of this biologic viewpoint.
Since English-American moral codes and sex laws are the direct outcome of the reproductive interpretation of sex,
they accept no form of socio-sexual activity outside of the marital state; and even marital intercourse is more or less lim-
ited to particular times and places and to the techniques which are most likely to result in conception. By this system, no
socio-sexual outlet is provided for the single male or for the widowed or divorced male, since they cannot legally procreate;
and homosexual and solitary sources of outlet, since they are completely without reproductive possibilities, are penalized
or frowned upon by public opinion and by the processes of the law.
Specifically, English-American legal codes restrict the sexual activity of the unmarried male by characterizing all
pre-marital, extra-marital, and post-marital intercourse as rape, statutory rape, fornication, adultery, prostitution, association
with a prostitute, incest, delinquency, a contribution to delinquency, assault and battery, or public indecency—all of which
are offenses with penalties attached. However it is labelled, all intercourse outside of marriage (non-marital intercourse) is
illicit and subject to penalty by statute law in most of the states of the Union, or by the precedent of the common law on
which most courts, in all states, chiefly depend when sex is involved. In addition to their restrictions on hetero-sexual inter-
course, statute law and t.
"Canadian Charter Rights case and criminalization of polyamorous households"
Presentation made at the Poly Living 2010 conference in Seattle on Oct 23,2010.
Crime Waves, Fears, and Social RealityThe American criminal just.docxwillcoxjanay
Crime Waves, Fears, and Social Reality
The American criminal justice system is a mirror that shows a distorted image of the dangers that threaten us—an image created more by the shape of the mirror than by the reality reflected.
—Jeffrey Reiman and Paul Leighton
For decades, polls have found that people in the United States are wor- ried about crime. A Gallup poll found that people worried their credit card information would be stolen by hackers (69%), their homes would be bur- glarized when they were not there (45%), their car would be stolen (42%), their child would be physically harmed while attending school (31%), they would be mugged on the streets (31%), their home would be burglarized when they were there (30%), they would be victims of terrorism (28%), they would be attacked while driving their car (20%), they would be murdered (18%), they would be the victim of a hate crime (18%), they would be sexu- ally assaulted (18%), or they would be assaulted/killed at work (7%) (Riffkin, 2014). The learning process for these fears is complex, but one contributing factor is the dissemination of crime statistics by the media and the govern- ment. (Recall our discussion of the crime clock in the first chapter.) How reli- able and valid are these statistics? Does the public’s perception of crime reflect the reality of crime?
The number of people who fear crime is substantial. Perceptions about individuals who engage in criminal behavior are even more revealing. Jef- frey Reiman and Paul Leighton (2017) describe the stereotyped image:
Think of a crime, any crime. . . . What do you see? The odds are you are not imagining an oil company executive sitting at his desk, calculating the costs of proper safety precautions and deciding not to invest in them. Prob
ably what you see with your mind’s eye is one person attacking another physically or robbing something from another via the threat of physical attack. Look more closely. What does the attacker look like? It’s a safe bet he (and it is a he, of course) is not wearing a suit and tie. In fact, you—like us, like almost anyone else in America—picture a young, tough, lower- class male when the thought of crime first pops into your head. (p. 74)
The “Typical Criminal” in the minds of most people who fear being vic- tims of crime is poor, young, urban, and black—“threatening the lives, limbs, and possessions of the law-abiding members of society, necessitating recourse to the ultimate weapons of force and detention in our common defense” (pp. 67–68).
The presidential campaign for George H. Bush in 1988 capitalized on this stereotypical image with its infamous “Willie Horton” commercials. The governor of Massachusetts, Michael Dukakis, was Bush’s opponent; his state had a highly successful prison furlough program. The Bush campaign seized on a single case where a participant in the program (Horton) committed a violent crime while on furlough. Willie Horton was an African American male whose predations were .
Crime Waves, Fears, and Social RealityThe American criminal just.docxfaithxdunce63732
Crime Waves, Fears, and Social Reality
The American criminal justice system is a mirror that shows a distorted image of the dangers that threaten us—an image created more by the shape of the mirror than by the reality reflected.
—Jeffrey Reiman and Paul Leighton
For decades, polls have found that people in the United States are wor- ried about crime. A Gallup poll found that people worried their credit card information would be stolen by hackers (69%), their homes would be bur- glarized when they were not there (45%), their car would be stolen (42%), their child would be physically harmed while attending school (31%), they would be mugged on the streets (31%), their home would be burglarized when they were there (30%), they would be victims of terrorism (28%), they would be attacked while driving their car (20%), they would be murdered (18%), they would be the victim of a hate crime (18%), they would be sexu- ally assaulted (18%), or they would be assaulted/killed at work (7%) (Riffkin, 2014). The learning process for these fears is complex, but one contributing factor is the dissemination of crime statistics by the media and the govern- ment. (Recall our discussion of the crime clock in the first chapter.) How reli- able and valid are these statistics? Does the public’s perception of crime reflect the reality of crime?
The number of people who fear crime is substantial. Perceptions about individuals who engage in criminal behavior are even more revealing. Jef- frey Reiman and Paul Leighton (2017) describe the stereotyped image:
Think of a crime, any crime. . . . What do you see? The odds are you are not imagining an oil company executive sitting at his desk, calculating the costs of proper safety precautions and deciding not to invest in them. Prob
ably what you see with your mind’s eye is one person attacking another physically or robbing something from another via the threat of physical attack. Look more closely. What does the attacker look like? It’s a safe bet he (and it is a he, of course) is not wearing a suit and tie. In fact, you—like us, like almost anyone else in America—picture a young, tough, lower- class male when the thought of crime first pops into your head. (p. 74)
The “Typical Criminal” in the minds of most people who fear being vic- tims of crime is poor, young, urban, and black—“threatening the lives, limbs, and possessions of the law-abiding members of society, necessitating recourse to the ultimate weapons of force and detention in our common defense” (pp. 67–68).
The presidential campaign for George H. Bush in 1988 capitalized on this stereotypical image with its infamous “Willie Horton” commercials. The governor of Massachusetts, Michael Dukakis, was Bush’s opponent; his state had a highly successful prison furlough program. The Bush campaign seized on a single case where a participant in the program (Horton) committed a violent crime while on furlough. Willie Horton was an African American male whose predations were .
Research Paper draftHave changes implemented by the Trump .docxverad6
Research Paper draft
Have changes implemented by the Trump era Justice Department affected civil rights and if so,
how have civil rights been affected?
Ayala Layen-Slann
Prof. Jean, Adeline Bernadette
ENC-1101-OL2: COMPOSITION
St. Thomas University
Tuesday, December 11, 2018
Jean Adeline Bernadette
106850000000004004
The United States Justice Department has greatly reduced enforcement of civil rights 2
For decades, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has used court-enforced agreements to
protect civil rights, successfully desegregating school systems, reforming police departments,
ensuring access for the disabled and defending religious freedom (Huseman and Waldman 2017).
In 2016 the many of the new first-time voters exercised their right to vote, hoping to be able to
see how “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness” (Jefferson, 1776) take place in a free and
democratic country.
Since the election in November 2016, the general concept is that the country is in a
continued ride on a roller-coaster where many core values are compromised, and more conflicts
arise. In the following pages, a conflict of interest and how it affects the political, economic and
social system will be reviewed. Additionally, suggested approaches to this conflict of interest will
be reviewed as well.
The Office of the Attorney General was created by the Judiciary Act of 1789, as a part-
time position. By 1870, after the civil war, the Congress passed the act to establish the
Department of Justice with the Attorney General as its head. The DOJ mission as it is taken from
their website states ”To enforce the law and defend the interests of the United States according to
the law; to ensure public safety against threats foreign and domestic; to provide federal leadership
in preventing and controlling crime; to seek just punishment for those guilty of unlawful
behavior; and to ensure fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans.”(DOJ,
2018). There is no doubt that changes implemented by the Justice Department under President
Trump are having the overall effect of reducing the enforcement of civil rights laws.
On June 16, 2017, Elizabeth Hill, press secretary for the Department of Education told
ProPublica that the new “enforcement instructions seek to clear out the backlog while giving
every complaint the individualized and thorough consideration it deserves.” (Huseman and
Waldman 2017). The DOJ under Attorney General Jeff Sessions is now taking more of a light
Jean Adeline Bernadette
106850000000004004
A comma is generally not needed in an in-text citation.
Jean Adeline Bernadette
106850000000004004
All of this should be one Introduction paragraph.
Jean Adeline Bernadette
106850000000004004
A running head is not used in the MLA format.
The United States Justice Department has greatly reduced enforcement of civil rights 3
approach towards enforcement of civil rights whi.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
This presentation explores whether SORNA laws are making us safer, 2) examines the negative effects on sex offenders, family and friends, and 3) takes a cursory look at the constitutionality of the laws.
PART TWENTY-SEVENCONSENSUS AND CONFORMITYMARITAL STATUS .docxdanhaley45372
PART TWENTY-SEVEN
CONSENSUS AND CONFORMITY
MARITAL STATUS AND SEXUAL OUTLET
Among the social factors affecting sexual activity, marital status is the one that would seem most likely to influence both
the frequencies and the sources of the individual’s outlet. The data, however, need detailed analyses.
Social and Legal Limitations
In Social and religious philosophies, there have been two antagonistic interpretations of sex. There have been
cultures and religions which have inclined to the hedonistic doctrine that sexual activity is justifiable for its immediate and
pleasurable return; and there have been cultures and religions which accept sex primarily as the necessary means of pro-
creation, to be enjoyed only in marriage, and then only if reproduction is the goal of the act. The Hebrews were among the
Asiatics who held this ascetic approach to sex; and Christian sexual philosophy and English-American sex law is largely
built around these Hebraic interpretations, around Greek ascetic philosophies, and around the asceticism of some of the
Roman cults (Angus 1925, May 1931).
A third possible interpretation of sex as a normal biologic function, acceptable in whatever form it is manifested,
has hardly figured in either general or scientific discussions. By English and American standards, such an attitude is con-
sidered primitive, materialistic or animalistic, and beneath the dignity of a civilized and educated people. Freud has con-
tributed more than the biologists toward an adoption of this biologic viewpoint.
Since English-American moral codes and sex laws are the direct outcome of the reproductive interpretation of sex,
they accept no form of socio-sexual activity outside of the marital state; and even marital intercourse is more or less lim-
ited to particular times and places and to the techniques which are most likely to result in conception. By this system, no
socio-sexual outlet is provided for the single male or for the widowed or divorced male, since they cannot legally procreate;
and homosexual and solitary sources of outlet, since they are completely without reproductive possibilities, are penalized
or frowned upon by public opinion and by the processes of the law.
Specifically, English-American legal codes restrict the sexual activity of the unmarried male by characterizing all
pre-marital, extra-marital, and post-marital intercourse as rape, statutory rape, fornication, adultery, prostitution, association
with a prostitute, incest, delinquency, a contribution to delinquency, assault and battery, or public indecency—all of which
are offenses with penalties attached. However it is labelled, all intercourse outside of marriage (non-marital intercourse) is
illicit and subject to penalty by statute law in most of the states of the Union, or by the precedent of the common law on
which most courts, in all states, chiefly depend when sex is involved. In addition to their restrictions on hetero-sexual inter-
course, statute law and t.
"Canadian Charter Rights case and criminalization of polyamorous households"
Presentation made at the Poly Living 2010 conference in Seattle on Oct 23,2010.
Crime Waves, Fears, and Social RealityThe American criminal just.docxwillcoxjanay
Crime Waves, Fears, and Social Reality
The American criminal justice system is a mirror that shows a distorted image of the dangers that threaten us—an image created more by the shape of the mirror than by the reality reflected.
—Jeffrey Reiman and Paul Leighton
For decades, polls have found that people in the United States are wor- ried about crime. A Gallup poll found that people worried their credit card information would be stolen by hackers (69%), their homes would be bur- glarized when they were not there (45%), their car would be stolen (42%), their child would be physically harmed while attending school (31%), they would be mugged on the streets (31%), their home would be burglarized when they were there (30%), they would be victims of terrorism (28%), they would be attacked while driving their car (20%), they would be murdered (18%), they would be the victim of a hate crime (18%), they would be sexu- ally assaulted (18%), or they would be assaulted/killed at work (7%) (Riffkin, 2014). The learning process for these fears is complex, but one contributing factor is the dissemination of crime statistics by the media and the govern- ment. (Recall our discussion of the crime clock in the first chapter.) How reli- able and valid are these statistics? Does the public’s perception of crime reflect the reality of crime?
The number of people who fear crime is substantial. Perceptions about individuals who engage in criminal behavior are even more revealing. Jef- frey Reiman and Paul Leighton (2017) describe the stereotyped image:
Think of a crime, any crime. . . . What do you see? The odds are you are not imagining an oil company executive sitting at his desk, calculating the costs of proper safety precautions and deciding not to invest in them. Prob
ably what you see with your mind’s eye is one person attacking another physically or robbing something from another via the threat of physical attack. Look more closely. What does the attacker look like? It’s a safe bet he (and it is a he, of course) is not wearing a suit and tie. In fact, you—like us, like almost anyone else in America—picture a young, tough, lower- class male when the thought of crime first pops into your head. (p. 74)
The “Typical Criminal” in the minds of most people who fear being vic- tims of crime is poor, young, urban, and black—“threatening the lives, limbs, and possessions of the law-abiding members of society, necessitating recourse to the ultimate weapons of force and detention in our common defense” (pp. 67–68).
The presidential campaign for George H. Bush in 1988 capitalized on this stereotypical image with its infamous “Willie Horton” commercials. The governor of Massachusetts, Michael Dukakis, was Bush’s opponent; his state had a highly successful prison furlough program. The Bush campaign seized on a single case where a participant in the program (Horton) committed a violent crime while on furlough. Willie Horton was an African American male whose predations were .
Crime Waves, Fears, and Social RealityThe American criminal just.docxfaithxdunce63732
Crime Waves, Fears, and Social Reality
The American criminal justice system is a mirror that shows a distorted image of the dangers that threaten us—an image created more by the shape of the mirror than by the reality reflected.
—Jeffrey Reiman and Paul Leighton
For decades, polls have found that people in the United States are wor- ried about crime. A Gallup poll found that people worried their credit card information would be stolen by hackers (69%), their homes would be bur- glarized when they were not there (45%), their car would be stolen (42%), their child would be physically harmed while attending school (31%), they would be mugged on the streets (31%), their home would be burglarized when they were there (30%), they would be victims of terrorism (28%), they would be attacked while driving their car (20%), they would be murdered (18%), they would be the victim of a hate crime (18%), they would be sexu- ally assaulted (18%), or they would be assaulted/killed at work (7%) (Riffkin, 2014). The learning process for these fears is complex, but one contributing factor is the dissemination of crime statistics by the media and the govern- ment. (Recall our discussion of the crime clock in the first chapter.) How reli- able and valid are these statistics? Does the public’s perception of crime reflect the reality of crime?
The number of people who fear crime is substantial. Perceptions about individuals who engage in criminal behavior are even more revealing. Jef- frey Reiman and Paul Leighton (2017) describe the stereotyped image:
Think of a crime, any crime. . . . What do you see? The odds are you are not imagining an oil company executive sitting at his desk, calculating the costs of proper safety precautions and deciding not to invest in them. Prob
ably what you see with your mind’s eye is one person attacking another physically or robbing something from another via the threat of physical attack. Look more closely. What does the attacker look like? It’s a safe bet he (and it is a he, of course) is not wearing a suit and tie. In fact, you—like us, like almost anyone else in America—picture a young, tough, lower- class male when the thought of crime first pops into your head. (p. 74)
The “Typical Criminal” in the minds of most people who fear being vic- tims of crime is poor, young, urban, and black—“threatening the lives, limbs, and possessions of the law-abiding members of society, necessitating recourse to the ultimate weapons of force and detention in our common defense” (pp. 67–68).
The presidential campaign for George H. Bush in 1988 capitalized on this stereotypical image with its infamous “Willie Horton” commercials. The governor of Massachusetts, Michael Dukakis, was Bush’s opponent; his state had a highly successful prison furlough program. The Bush campaign seized on a single case where a participant in the program (Horton) committed a violent crime while on furlough. Willie Horton was an African American male whose predations were .
Research Paper draftHave changes implemented by the Trump .docxverad6
Research Paper draft
Have changes implemented by the Trump era Justice Department affected civil rights and if so,
how have civil rights been affected?
Ayala Layen-Slann
Prof. Jean, Adeline Bernadette
ENC-1101-OL2: COMPOSITION
St. Thomas University
Tuesday, December 11, 2018
Jean Adeline Bernadette
106850000000004004
The United States Justice Department has greatly reduced enforcement of civil rights 2
For decades, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has used court-enforced agreements to
protect civil rights, successfully desegregating school systems, reforming police departments,
ensuring access for the disabled and defending religious freedom (Huseman and Waldman 2017).
In 2016 the many of the new first-time voters exercised their right to vote, hoping to be able to
see how “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness” (Jefferson, 1776) take place in a free and
democratic country.
Since the election in November 2016, the general concept is that the country is in a
continued ride on a roller-coaster where many core values are compromised, and more conflicts
arise. In the following pages, a conflict of interest and how it affects the political, economic and
social system will be reviewed. Additionally, suggested approaches to this conflict of interest will
be reviewed as well.
The Office of the Attorney General was created by the Judiciary Act of 1789, as a part-
time position. By 1870, after the civil war, the Congress passed the act to establish the
Department of Justice with the Attorney General as its head. The DOJ mission as it is taken from
their website states ”To enforce the law and defend the interests of the United States according to
the law; to ensure public safety against threats foreign and domestic; to provide federal leadership
in preventing and controlling crime; to seek just punishment for those guilty of unlawful
behavior; and to ensure fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans.”(DOJ,
2018). There is no doubt that changes implemented by the Justice Department under President
Trump are having the overall effect of reducing the enforcement of civil rights laws.
On June 16, 2017, Elizabeth Hill, press secretary for the Department of Education told
ProPublica that the new “enforcement instructions seek to clear out the backlog while giving
every complaint the individualized and thorough consideration it deserves.” (Huseman and
Waldman 2017). The DOJ under Attorney General Jeff Sessions is now taking more of a light
Jean Adeline Bernadette
106850000000004004
A comma is generally not needed in an in-text citation.
Jean Adeline Bernadette
106850000000004004
All of this should be one Introduction paragraph.
Jean Adeline Bernadette
106850000000004004
A running head is not used in the MLA format.
The United States Justice Department has greatly reduced enforcement of civil rights 3
approach towards enforcement of civil rights whi.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
3. DEFINITION:
ANY FORM OF PHYSICAL, SEXUAL OR MENTAL AND EMOTIONAL
ABUSE WHICH MIGHT AMOUNT TO CRIMINAL CONDUCT AND
WHICH TAKES PLACE WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF A
RELATIONSHIP
THE RELATIONSHIP WILL BE BETWEEN PARTNERS (MARRIED,
COHABITING, CIVIL PARTNERSHIP OR OTHERWISE) OR EX-
PARTNERS & INCLUDES SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS
THE ABUSE CAN BE COMMITTED IN THE HOME OR ELSEWHERE
THE ABUSE CAN INCLUDE FEMALE ABUSE OF A MALE
‘DOMESTIC’ ABUSE
4. SET OF PRINCIPLES USED BY POLICE IN RESPONDING
TO DOMESTIC ABUSE ALLEGATIONS:
DETENTION
PRESUMPTION IN FAVOUR OF PROSECUTION
BAIL USUALLY OPPOSED AT COURT (ALTERNATIVELY
SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF BAIL)
COUNTER-COMPLAINT MAY NOT BE FULLY
INVESTIGATED
JOINT PROTOCOL BETWEEN POLICE
SCOTLAND & COPFS
5.
6. 1. NEW ‘DOMESTIC ABUSE’ AGGRAVATION –
INTENDING TO CAUSE PHYSICAL /
PSYCHOLOGICAL HARM
2. NEW OFFENCE - REVENGE PORN
THE ABUSIVE BEHAVIOUR & SEXUAL
HARM (SCOTLAND) ACT 2016
7. WIDER POWERS OF ARREST
GOODBYE DETENTION
HELLO ‘INVESTIGATIVE LIBERATION’
BAIL UNDERTAKINGS & SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF BAIL
REVIEW OF BAIL CONDITIONS
THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE (SCOTLAND) ACT
2016
8.
9. ENGAGING IN A COURSE OF BEHAVIOUR THAT IS
ABUSIVE OF PARTNER OR EX PARTNER, PHYSICALLY OR
PSYCHOLOGICALLY
CONTINUING OFFENCE
OBJECTIVE TEST
INTENTIONALLY OR RECKLESSLY
DIRECTED AT PARTNER, CHILD OR ANOTHER
DOMESTIC ABUSE (SCOTLAND) BILL
11. ‘THE REPORT OF THE PRE-RECORDED FURTHER
EVIDENCE WORK-STREAM’
PRE-TRIAL EVIDENCE
RECORDED ON CAMERA
SPECIALLY TRAINED INTERVIEWERS
NOT PRESENT FOR TRIAL
SCOTTISH COURTS & TRIBUNAL
SERVICE
EVIDENCE & PROCEDURE REVIEW
12. GET ADVICE….
…...BEFORE THE POLICE INTERVIEW
THIS IS SERIOUS!
ALTERNATIVE ACCOMMODATION MAY BE REQUIRED
CHECK YOUR FILE
WHAT ADVICE SHOULD YOU GIVE YOUR
CLIENT?