Faculty Senate Committee Approved 2018.03.09 Faculty Senate (full) Approved 2018.03.28 Leadership Approved 2018.04.02 Alternate Discussion Rubric – 10 points Criteria Ratings Pts Content 4 pts Distinguished Demonstrates mastery of subject matter related to learning outcome(s). 3.4 pts Proficient Demonstrates proficient subject matter knowledge related to learning outcome(s). 3 pts Basic Demonstrates basic subject matter knowledge related to learning outcome(s). 2.43 pts Below Expectations Demonstrates limited subject matter knowledge related to learning outcome(s). 0 pts Non -Performance Does not demonstrate subject matter knowledge related to learning outcome(s). __/4 Engagement 3 pts Distinguished Contributes to the discussion through meaningful interactions and ongoing engagement. 2.6 pts Proficient Contributes to the discussion through appropriate interactions and engagement. 2.25 pts Basic Contributes to the discussion with some interaction and/or engagement. 1.9 pts Below Expectations Does not sufficiently contribute to the discussion with appropriate interaction and/or engagement. 0 pts Non-Performance Does not engage in discussion. __/3 Critical Thinking 2 pts Distinguished Demonstrates advanced critical thinking skills. 1.75 pts Proficient Demonstrates strong critical thinking skills. 1.5 pts Basic Demonstrates some critical thinking skills. 1.25 pts Below Expectations Demonstrates limited critical thinking skills. 0 pts Non -Performance Does not demonstrate critical thinking skills. __/2 Communication 1 pts Distinguished Communication is clear, organized, academically honest, and well-presented. 0.87 pts Proficient Communication is clear, fairly organized, academically honest, and presented with few errors. 0.75 pts Basic Communication may be slightly unclear or disorganized. Communication may contain errors, but is academically honest. 0.63 pts Below Expectations Communication may be unclear, disorganized, or contain many errors but is academically honest. 0 pts Non-Performance Communication is unclear and contains many errors or may be academically dishonest. __/1 ...

1. Faculty Senate Committee Approved 2018.03.09
Faculty Senate (full) Approved 2018.03.28
Leadership Approved 2018.04.02
Alternate Discussion Rubric – 10 points
Criteria Ratings Pts
Content 4 pts Distinguished
Demonstrates
mastery of subject
matter related to
learning outcome(s).
3.4 pts Proficient
Demonstrates
proficient subject
matter knowledge
related to learning
outcome(s).
3 pts Basic
Demonstrates basic
subject matter
knowledge related to
learning outcome(s).
2.43 pts Below
Expectations
Demonstrates limited
subject matter
knowledge related to

2. learning outcome(s).
0 pts Non -Performance
Does not demonstrate
subject matter
knowledge related to
learning outcome(s).
__/4
Engagement 3 pts Distinguished
Contributes to the
discussion through
meaningful
interactions and
ongoing engagement.
2.6 pts Proficient
Contributes to the
discussion through
appropriate
interactions and
engagement.
2.25 pts Basic
Contributes to the
discussion with some
interaction and/or
engagement.
1.9 pts Below
Expectations
Does not sufficiently
contribute to the
discussion with
appropriate

3. interaction and/or
engagement.
0 pts Non-Performance
Does not engage in
discussion.
__/3
Critical Thinking 2 pts Distinguished
Demonstrates
advanced critical
thinking skills.
1.75 pts Proficient
Demonstrates
strong critical
thinking skills.
1.5 pts Basic
Demonstrates some
critical thinking skills.
1.25 pts Below
Expectations
Demonstrates limited
critical thinking skills.
0 pts Non -Performance
Does not demonstrate
critical thinking skills.
__/2
Communication 1 pts Distinguished
Communication is

4. clear, organized,
academically honest,
and well-presented.
0.87 pts Proficient
Communication is
clear, fairly
organized,
academically
honest, and
presented with few
errors.
0.75 pts Basic
Communication may
be slightly unclear or
disorganized.
Communication may
contain errors, but is
academically honest.
0.63 pts Below
Expectations
Communication may
be unclear,
disorganized, or
contain many errors
but is academically
honest.
0 pts Non-Performance
Communication is unclear
and contains many errors
or may be academically
dishonest.

5. __/1