1) Digitalization and decentralization have been accelerating the modularization of both industry structures and regulatory frameworks in the energy sector for 25 years. This has created opportunities for more granular and specialized generation, consumption, and regulation.
2) Emerging technologies are driving generation and storage down to the individual consumer level and enabling more dynamic distribution grids and transaction platforms. This could lead to new forms of self-regulation or regulation at the distribution level.
3) If regulators cannot adapt quickly to facilitate these innovation waves, the energy sector risks fragmenting into alternative regulatory models like "innovation zoos" that constrain disruption, or a landscape dominated by specialized startups and communities operating outside existing rules.
Power to the people: shifting control over electricity to citizens and consumersLeonardo ENERGY
Efficient electricity prices are only the first step to unleashing the potential for consumers to help drive the energy transition. In this webinar, David Robinson from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies will present on how consumers can help decarbonize the electricity system and how to engage the demand side through a combination of price and non-price incentives.
This presentation by Saskia LAVRIJSSEN, Professor of Economic Regulation and Governance of Network Industries at Tilberg University (Netherlands) and the Centre on Regulation in Europe was made during the discussion “Radical innovation in the electricity sector” held at the 63rd meeting of the OECD Working Party No. 2 on Competition and Regulation on 19 June 2017. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/1ZW.
Presentation on the Future City Programme and building IoT solutions in Milton Keynes. Presented by Sarah Gonsalves, Head of Policy at Milton Keynes Council, at Local Digital Futures: The Internet of Things & Local Public Services on 8 June 2015 in London.
SECO looks at how to manage the energy demands of the many elements when you have many sources, including the grid, but also local wind turbines, solar panels, geo-thermal as well as a local generator and possible energy storage. SECO optimises this many-to-many problem to ensure demand is met and that the cost of energy is minimised.
This report looks at how policymakers and regulators from across Europe can and are encouraging innovative digital business models in the solar PV ecosystem. It aims to support European policy makers identify existing best practices for the uptake of digital solar services in Europe.
Energy as a Service: Blockchain & the Emerging Energy Cloud 5/23/19Mark Goldstein
I presented “Energy as a Service: Blockchain & The Emerging Energy Cloud” at ASU Law’s Governance of Emerging Technologies & Science (GETS) Conference (https://events.asucollegeoflaw.com/gets/) on May 23, 2019 in Phoenix, AZ. It details the transition from traditional one-way power grids to two-way grids to an energy cloud with emerging peer-to-peer and transitive energy markets enabled by blockchain. A newly decentralized power ecosystem with low friction brokering and transactions, accompanied by regulatory reform, will be foundational for the fourth industrial revolution and offer new solutions to industry and sustainability issues.
Case Study: Blockchain as the Foundation of Alectra's Grid Exchange Transacti...Jill Kirkpatrick
Alectra Utilities is leveraging blockchain technologies to develop GridExchange, a platform for transactive energy that allows its users to create new energy markets, as well as bidding into existing ones.
Behavior changes are set based on homeowner preferences for use of their distributed energy resources. The platform also creates statistics on customer energy usage and validates participation in these energy markets, confirming settlement when compensation for energy services has been paid.
As a result, users are empowered with greater choices, control and autonomy to buy, consume, and sell energy, and the utility improves reliability and forecasting by gaining visibility of energy usage patterns and changing behaviors.
Introducing the Global Observatory on Peer-to-Peer, Community Self-Consumpti...Leonardo ENERGY
Launched in September 2019, the Global Observatory is a three-year collaborative research project led by University College London (UCL) under the User-Centred Energy Systems Technical Collaboration Programme by the International Energy Agency (IEA). It represents a forum for international collaboration to understand the policy, regulatory, social and technological conditions necessary to support the wider deployment of peer-to-peer, community self-consumption and transactive energy models. It includes 130 participants from 10+ countries, representing a range of sectors (academia, industry, non-profits) and currently working on the researching and implementation of these new business models. To learn more, please visit: https://userstcp.org/annex/peer-to-peer-energy-trading/.
Many new business models and types of entrepreneurs are emerging to accelerate the energy transition. We will share first findings on how these new business models look like and the new type of entrepreneurs and entrepreneurial capabilities needed to operate successfully in the complex, uncertain energy transition, and of course reflect briefly on what this means for policy.
CoordiNet- Large scale demonstrations for TSO-DSO CooperatioLeonardo ENERGY
Webinar recording at https://youtu.be/xgfUd6acBfk
The CoordiNet project aims at demonstrating how Distribution System Operators (DSO) and Transmission System Operators (TSO) shall act in a coordinated manner to procure and activate grid services in the most reliable and efficient way through the implementation of three large-scale demonstrations.
Overview of the FlexPlan project. Focus on EU regulatory analysis and TSO-DSO...Leonardo ENERGY
Webinar recording at https://youtu.be/4s2GGlu-ylc
The FlexPlan project (https://flexplan-project.eu/) aims at establishing a new grid planning methodology making use of storage and flexible loads as an alternative to the build-up of new grid elements. After introducing the project, the webinar will focus on pan-European grid planning regulation and present practices of TSOs and DSOs.
Electric Distribution Grids in a 21st Century Energy SystemLorenzo Kristov
Architecture of distribution system operators (DSOs) and transmission-distribution coordination in a decentralized, layered electricity network based on renewable energy. Presentation for Stanford University Bits & Watts, June 2017.
Power to the people: shifting control over electricity to citizens and consumersLeonardo ENERGY
Efficient electricity prices are only the first step to unleashing the potential for consumers to help drive the energy transition. In this webinar, David Robinson from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies will present on how consumers can help decarbonize the electricity system and how to engage the demand side through a combination of price and non-price incentives.
This presentation by Saskia LAVRIJSSEN, Professor of Economic Regulation and Governance of Network Industries at Tilberg University (Netherlands) and the Centre on Regulation in Europe was made during the discussion “Radical innovation in the electricity sector” held at the 63rd meeting of the OECD Working Party No. 2 on Competition and Regulation on 19 June 2017. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/1ZW.
Presentation on the Future City Programme and building IoT solutions in Milton Keynes. Presented by Sarah Gonsalves, Head of Policy at Milton Keynes Council, at Local Digital Futures: The Internet of Things & Local Public Services on 8 June 2015 in London.
SECO looks at how to manage the energy demands of the many elements when you have many sources, including the grid, but also local wind turbines, solar panels, geo-thermal as well as a local generator and possible energy storage. SECO optimises this many-to-many problem to ensure demand is met and that the cost of energy is minimised.
This report looks at how policymakers and regulators from across Europe can and are encouraging innovative digital business models in the solar PV ecosystem. It aims to support European policy makers identify existing best practices for the uptake of digital solar services in Europe.
Energy as a Service: Blockchain & the Emerging Energy Cloud 5/23/19Mark Goldstein
I presented “Energy as a Service: Blockchain & The Emerging Energy Cloud” at ASU Law’s Governance of Emerging Technologies & Science (GETS) Conference (https://events.asucollegeoflaw.com/gets/) on May 23, 2019 in Phoenix, AZ. It details the transition from traditional one-way power grids to two-way grids to an energy cloud with emerging peer-to-peer and transitive energy markets enabled by blockchain. A newly decentralized power ecosystem with low friction brokering and transactions, accompanied by regulatory reform, will be foundational for the fourth industrial revolution and offer new solutions to industry and sustainability issues.
Case Study: Blockchain as the Foundation of Alectra's Grid Exchange Transacti...Jill Kirkpatrick
Alectra Utilities is leveraging blockchain technologies to develop GridExchange, a platform for transactive energy that allows its users to create new energy markets, as well as bidding into existing ones.
Behavior changes are set based on homeowner preferences for use of their distributed energy resources. The platform also creates statistics on customer energy usage and validates participation in these energy markets, confirming settlement when compensation for energy services has been paid.
As a result, users are empowered with greater choices, control and autonomy to buy, consume, and sell energy, and the utility improves reliability and forecasting by gaining visibility of energy usage patterns and changing behaviors.
Introducing the Global Observatory on Peer-to-Peer, Community Self-Consumpti...Leonardo ENERGY
Launched in September 2019, the Global Observatory is a three-year collaborative research project led by University College London (UCL) under the User-Centred Energy Systems Technical Collaboration Programme by the International Energy Agency (IEA). It represents a forum for international collaboration to understand the policy, regulatory, social and technological conditions necessary to support the wider deployment of peer-to-peer, community self-consumption and transactive energy models. It includes 130 participants from 10+ countries, representing a range of sectors (academia, industry, non-profits) and currently working on the researching and implementation of these new business models. To learn more, please visit: https://userstcp.org/annex/peer-to-peer-energy-trading/.
Many new business models and types of entrepreneurs are emerging to accelerate the energy transition. We will share first findings on how these new business models look like and the new type of entrepreneurs and entrepreneurial capabilities needed to operate successfully in the complex, uncertain energy transition, and of course reflect briefly on what this means for policy.
CoordiNet- Large scale demonstrations for TSO-DSO CooperatioLeonardo ENERGY
Webinar recording at https://youtu.be/xgfUd6acBfk
The CoordiNet project aims at demonstrating how Distribution System Operators (DSO) and Transmission System Operators (TSO) shall act in a coordinated manner to procure and activate grid services in the most reliable and efficient way through the implementation of three large-scale demonstrations.
Overview of the FlexPlan project. Focus on EU regulatory analysis and TSO-DSO...Leonardo ENERGY
Webinar recording at https://youtu.be/4s2GGlu-ylc
The FlexPlan project (https://flexplan-project.eu/) aims at establishing a new grid planning methodology making use of storage and flexible loads as an alternative to the build-up of new grid elements. After introducing the project, the webinar will focus on pan-European grid planning regulation and present practices of TSOs and DSOs.
Electric Distribution Grids in a 21st Century Energy SystemLorenzo Kristov
Architecture of distribution system operators (DSOs) and transmission-distribution coordination in a decentralized, layered electricity network based on renewable energy. Presentation for Stanford University Bits & Watts, June 2017.
Webinar : What's the impact of regulation on energy communities? Cases from B...Cluster TWEED
2nd training session of 6 online training sessions for energy communities: 'What's the impact of regulation on energy communities? Cases from Belgium, France & Italy'.
This 6 pack series is organised by TWEED and Flux50, energy clusters in Belgium.
Jean-Michel Glachant launches the Future Power Grid Managers Programme. Opening Seminar: setting the scene & projects launching, 3 October 2013, Florence
Apresentação ministrada pelo Sr. Mike Lees, Diretor Técnico da EA Technology, exibida durante a Semana Brasil-Reino Unido de Baixo Carbono, realizada no Rio de Janeiro entre os dias 22 e 23 de março de 2016.
Flexibility needs at system level and how RD&I projects are leveraging these ...Leonardo ENERGY
Recording at https://youtu.be/cd5bRnSM0zI
The presentation provides an introduction to flexibility solutions, which can be used to increase efficiency in power systems. The solutions considered for the webinar are network level solutions. This introduction is followed by the presentation of FlexPlan and CoordiNet as examples of RD&I projects where flexibility solutions are being developed to change the power system landscape.
"Next Gen Grid Tech Commercialization" for Duke University Energy Initiative ...Josh Gould
Guest lecture on "Next Gen Grid Tech Commercialization" for Duke University Energy Initiative graduate level course entitled: “Emerging Energy Technologies – From Lab to Market.” (790-01)
Show and Tell - Data and Digitalisation, Digital Twins.pdfSIFOfgem
This is the third in a series of 'Show and Tell' webinars from the Ofgem Strategic Innovation Fund Discovery phase, covering the Digital Twin projects.
As the move towards a net zero energy system accelerates, network customers and consumers will require simplified and accessible digital products, processes and services that can improve their user experience. Data and digital initiatives are already beginning to show the potential to improve the efficiency of energy networks whilst making it easier for third parties to interact with and innovate for the energy system. Digitalisation of energy network activities will contribute to better coordination, planning and network optimisation.
You will hear from SIF projects which are investigating new digital products and services such as digital twins.
The Strategic Innovation Fund (SIF) is an Ofgem programme managed in partnership with Innovate UK, part of UKRI. The SIF aims to fund network innovation that will contribute to achieving Net Zero rapidly and at lowest cost to consumers, and help transform the UK into the ‘Silicon Valley’ of energy, making it the best place for high-potential businesses to grow and scale in the energy market.
For more information on the SIF visit: www.ofgem.gov.uk/sif
Or sign-up for our newsletter here: https://ukri.innovateuk.org/ofgem-sif-subscription-sign-up
This session helps you understand the direction the market is taking and how you should plan your future battery policy.
Batteries are the hot topic of the moment, but so far few are being installed and commissioned at scale across the sector. This is not only a technology issue but a finance problem as at present it is often difficult to make the financial case. This session will not only focus on how battery technology is developing but also on how changes in the electricity codes could increase the income generated by batteries.
Batteries installed in medium to large sites across the country could be used to balance the local and national grid. The use of batteries to reduce demand at peak has a value that through the balancing mechanism unit (BMU) can be paid to those operating batteries. This new income stream will change the way you use, own and contract batteries.
Similar to Exploring New Regulatory Worlds in Era of Digitalization & Decentralization (20)
Presentation @ Turin School of Regulation, Italy
5 September 2019
by Jean-Michel Glachant
Loyola de Palacio Chair Prof.
& Director Florence School of Regulation
European University Institute (Florence, Italy)
0x01 - Newton's Third Law: Static vs. Dynamic AbusersOWASP Beja
f you offer a service on the web, odds are that someone will abuse it. Be it an API, a SaaS, a PaaS, or even a static website, someone somewhere will try to figure out a way to use it to their own needs. In this talk we'll compare measures that are effective against static attackers and how to battle a dynamic attacker who adapts to your counter-measures.
About the Speaker
===============
Diogo Sousa, Engineering Manager @ Canonical
An opinionated individual with an interest in cryptography and its intersection with secure software development.
This presentation by Morris Kleiner (University of Minnesota), was made during the discussion “Competition and Regulation in Professions and Occupations” held at the Working Party No. 2 on Competition and Regulation on 10 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/crps.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation, created by Syed Faiz ul Hassan, explores the profound influence of media on public perception and behavior. It delves into the evolution of media from oral traditions to modern digital and social media platforms. Key topics include the role of media in information propagation, socialization, crisis awareness, globalization, and education. The presentation also examines media influence through agenda setting, propaganda, and manipulative techniques used by advertisers and marketers. Furthermore, it highlights the impact of surveillance enabled by media technologies on personal behavior and preferences. Through this comprehensive overview, the presentation aims to shed light on how media shapes collective consciousness and public opinion.
Have you ever wondered how search works while visiting an e-commerce site, internal website, or searching through other types of online resources? Look no further than this informative session on the ways that taxonomies help end-users navigate the internet! Hear from taxonomists and other information professionals who have first-hand experience creating and working with taxonomies that aid in navigation, search, and discovery across a range of disciplines.
Sharpen existing tools or get a new toolbox? Contemporary cluster initiatives...Orkestra
UIIN Conference, Madrid, 27-29 May 2024
James Wilson, Orkestra and Deusto Business School
Emily Wise, Lund University
Madeline Smith, The Glasgow School of Art
Acorn Recovery: Restore IT infra within minutesIP ServerOne
Introducing Acorn Recovery as a Service, a simple, fast, and secure managed disaster recovery (DRaaS) by IP ServerOne. A DR solution that helps restore your IT infra within minutes.
Exploring New Regulatory Worlds in Era of Digitalization & Decentralization
1. Exploring New Regulatory Worlds in EraExploring New Regulatory Worlds in Era
of Digitalizationof Digitalization
& Decentralization (V2)& Decentralization (V2)
KARPSAC 10 December 2017KARPSAC 10 December 2017
Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaRiyadh, Saudi Arabia
Jean-Michel GlachantJean-Michel Glachant
Loyola de Palacio Chair
Director Florence School of Regulation
European University Institute (Florence, Italy)
2. 3 step story: Step 1
Digitalization & Decentralization did start 25 years ago with: Half-hourly meters, CCGTs,
Third-Party Access, & Wholesale PXs. Both are now furiously accelerating.
•XXth Century Double Unbundling: Unbundling of industry structures & unbundling of rules
production did create a “modular world”
1- Unbundling of industry between “Grids”, “System”, “Market”, & “Markets Players”
(-NB: US vs US vs EU- ).
Power Industry becomes “modular” (car industry; computer industry)
2- Unbundling of regulation with “Indep. Regulators” (Grids issues), & “Self-Regulation” (for
System Operation & Market Design)
-NB: US vs US vs EU-
Regulation too becomes “modular” (ideal-type is computer “Plug & Play”; not for cars)
3- This new world favoured by both decentralization (new Technology: CCGT; up to 5 times
smaller) & digitalization (hourly meters; ICT: for grids, for new Market algorithms &
settlement process)
2
3. I now assume that Andrea & Fereidoon
will develop more “New Market Design”
& “New Business Models”
Therefore I will look more towards
“New Regulatory Models”
4. 3 step story: 2nd
Step
• XXI Century Waves of innovations: all assets become “modular & digitalized”; consumers self-
transform into playing users; distribution grids become interactive
1- “Efficient” scale for generation down to size of individual consumers (kW PV for households; MW
Wind for B2B). Cost of PV at $2000/3000 kW. Cost of battery storage already at $200 kWh for
1MW size.
2- Digitalization down to single unit of generation and of consumption. Digitalization extended to all
types of grids and devices.
3- Distribution grids to become interactive (but centralized) systems or interactive (common rules)
platforms
4- Digitalization to permit individual units of generation and of consumption to be matched,
aggregated, disaggregated, and settled on open or private platforms (think Blockchains; already
used in Germany for Renewables Community Services)
Users can create “network increasing value” by using more & more dynamic services (think sharing
1MW storage with astute algrorithm)
4
5. 2nd
step leading to “Regulation Innovation”
Authorities may create new Level of regulation (going beyond transmission
grids & wholesale markets) surfing on innovation waves; à la New York
“Platform Debate” – European Commission “Demand Empowerment”)
because Costs & Benefits of services & infrastructures are become dynamic
> Costs have high transaction costs component (access to information & to
credible commitments)
~ Designing, adapting rules is key to strong lowering of costs
> Benefits have high “users play” component (positive network externality)
~ Inducing, following, facilitating play by users is key to evolution of
benefits
5
6. Demanding transformation for regulators
• To organize with self-regulation in Forum </> Platforms of regulation for
innovations
Regulators can act by creating “Open Regulation Forum” which can become
real “Reflexive Governance Platforms”.
It requires:
*Regulators with high skills
~kind of managers in “innovation wave facilitation”
**Regulators with legitimacy to do so
~such regulation is loosely defined by law, difficult to review by courts
• >> Low likelihood?
7. A blocking factor: De-socializing?
•Consumers able exiting regulation: Empowerment by technology innovations
(as PV & batteries) to exit grid
regulation----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
•With PV: consumers can escape grid as monopoly access to energy generation =
Empowerment by technology innovation; ~$2500 kW of PV for non-residential
consumers or “blocks” of consumers
•With battery: consumers can escape grid as monopoly access to system balancing
flexibility = Empowerment by technology innovations; ~$200 kWh of storage from
1MW
•Consumers can compare decentralized technology innovations to system
connection costs: key role given to consumer tariffs formula
7
8. FLORENCE SCHOOL “DISTRI.BREXIT” RESEARCH
FRAME
Schittekatte tests 3 network tariff structures to recover costs:
1/ Volumetric network charges with net-metering: (Elec. withdrawn) – (Elec. Injected) #
Grid offers free of charge the balancing of PV generation
2/ Volumetric network charges without net-metering: (Elec. withdrawn) + (Elec.
Injected) # Grid is paid for balancing PV generation > Role for battery
3/ Capacity-based network charges: {+ or –} capacity at peak # Role for battery
Schittekatte benchmarks using 2 metrics:
a.) Weighted average annual system cost ~ proxy for efficiency
b.) Increase of individual contributions paid by grid users ~ proxy for equity
And 2 matrices with each 4 states of the world:
1/ Technology matrix: cost level of solar PV & cost level of batteries
2/ System context matrix: wholesale price level & network cost level
8
9. 9
TECHNOLOGY MATRIX: RESULTS WITH 50 % “POTENTIAL” PROSUMERS
High technology costs Low technology costs
Investment cost solar PV 4400 €/kWpeak (LCOE: 0.20 €/kWh) 2200 €/kWpeak (LCOE: 0.10 €/kWh)
Investment cost batteries 500 €/kWh (C-rate of 1) 250 €/kWh (C-rate of 1)
Proportion default network charges in consumer bill 40 % (770 €/year)
Proportion default commodity costs in consumer bill 60% (1155 €/year)
Default electricity cost consumer 1925 €/year
“The Past” “Today”
“The Future”“But no sun…”
10. 10
SYSTEM MATRIX: RESULTS WITH 50 % OF
PROSUMERS
High wholesale electricity price Low wholesale electricity price
Wholesale electricity cost 0.20 €/kWh 0.10 €/kWh
High sunk cost Low sunk cost High sunk cost Low sunk cost
Proportion default network charges in consumer bill 60 % (2310 €) 20 % (385 €) 60 % (1155 €) 20 % (195 €)
Proportion default commodity costs in consumer bill 40 % (1540 €) 80 % (1540 €) 40 % (770 €) 80 % (770 €)
Default electricity cost consumer 3850 €/year 1925 €/year 1925 €/year 965 €/year
Investment cost solar PV 3300 €/kWpeak (LCOE: 0.15 €/kWh)
Investment cost batteries 375 €/kWh (C-rate of 1)
Decentralisation Paradise:
no incentive to “push back”
“EU Today?”
“EU islands?”
“EU Yesterday?”
11. 11
MIT Study did show
last year that current
wave of innovations
calls for a carefully
“small spot” (time &
location) recalibration
of all regulation for
distribution networks
BUT Today
Distribution grids are
the last “miles” of
“universal service”,
“postal stamp”,
“social tariff”, etc.
Blockade? New York?
12. 12
Table 1: Summary of market and grid dimensions of inter-TSO and DSO-TSO cooperation
Green System state Amber system state Red system state
Marketcooperation
Inter-TSO
Day-ahead market operation with capacity
allocation
• NEMOs with market coupling function
• Competition rules for Power exchanges (PX)
Flexibility market operation with forward capacity allocation
• TSO-BSP model => Allocation of forward capacity rights to
BSP
• TSO-TSO model => Multilateral inter-TSO Common Merit
Order
No market action
DSO-TSO
Day-ahead market operation with capacity
allocation
• Requires definition of borders where capacity
could be allocated
• Operation of PX/NEMO could be extended to
DSO level
Flexibility market operation with forward capacity allocation
• TSO-FSP model =>
- Current model, DSO validates, weak form of cooperation
- Depending on where structural congestions are, FCA could
be required in the future.
• TSO-DSO model => Joint procurement flexibility services
- Pilots projects looking into it
- Also requires implicit allocation of forward capacity, were
there are structural congestions
No Market action
Florence School research (Hamdush & Meeus)
Options for DSOs-TSO new System cooperation
13. 13
Gridcooperation
Inter-TSO
Day-ahead capacity calculation
• Common regional calculation methodology
• Coordinated capacity calculator (CCC)
Forward capacity calculation
• TSO-BSP model => Calculate the capacity to be explicitly
allocated to BSPs
• TSO-TSO model => Calculation of capacity to be implicitly
allocated
• Both models =>
- Validated FCA sent to Coordinated capacity calculator
(CCC)
- Common regional calculation methodology
Firmness of allocated border capacity
• High compensation, if not force
majeure
• Minimum compensation, if force
majeure
DSO-TSO
Day-ahead border capacity calculation
• Cooperation for border capacity calculation
- Requires defining borders where structural
congestion is located
• Joint or hierarchical capacity calculation are
options
Forward capacity calculation
• SCA, reducing grid reinforcement cost & reserves (practiced)
• FSP selling its services to TSO could be required to reserve
and nominate border capacity; either on the D-T or UD-D
border or both borders.
Firmness of allocated border capacity
• Compensation could be foreseen in
case firmness of allocated capacity is
not maintained.
• This requires capacity allocation in
defined borders (not the case today)
Florence School research (Hamdush & Meeus)
Options for DSOs-TSO new System cooperation
(End)
14. 3 step story: 3d Step
If public authorities cannot tackle the waves of innovation with a new and open
regulatory platform. Evolution of regulation can take other forms.
•Five “worlds of regulation”: alternative Governance(s) of “innovation waves in a
modular industry”
(New Assets Modularity)
+ (new Entrepreneurs)
+ (new Users)
> to spread into 5 alternative “Regulatory Worlds”?
1-Forums (already seen)
Four Alternatives:
~2-Innovation Zoos ~3-Communities
~4-Garage Cow-Boys ~5-Big e-Sisters
14
15. Alternative world (1)
~- Innovation Zoo (Sandboxes for Innovation)
Old infrastructures & companies stay in place. No big entry by new comers.
Old infrastructures go digital step by step. In a frame set by regulators.
Ad Hoc “extra candies” for a few R&D experiments & pilots
+ “Menu of incentive contracts” for deployment.
If strong involvement of users is needed >> Go to Community?
If flow of radical innovation creation unstoppable>> Go to Garage Cow-boys?
If strong innovation management &financing involved>> Go to Big e-Sisters?
15
16. Alternative world (2)
~- Community (Do it in your own club)
Users create new governance by combining service & infrastructure usages
innovation with their own demand adaptation.
Issue with scalability (deployment beyond 1 community)
Issue with coordination (local niches)
Issue with Grand’Pa Public Service consumers (demand is embedded into
service production & infrastructure usage. “Pure consumers” have no right in
Community)
Issue with dynamic innovation (rights of users exiting one community for
different one)
16
17. Alternative world (3)
~- Garage Cow-boy (I am a handsome lonesome cowboy)
Old infrastructures & old companies are neutralized by aggressively smart
regulation as “open platforms” (New York dream).
Flow of radical innovation creation can only come from individual “strongly
inventive” pioneers -triggering adoption by users, then increasing value,
etc.
Issue with scalability (deployment beyond 1 garage)
Issue with coordination (between local garages)
Issue with Grand’Pa Public Service consumers (value of innovation is
embedded into users adoption of innovation. “Pure consumers” have no right
there)
Issue with privacy & security: How users data & privacy is protected? How
integrity is maintained & pirates are barred of hacking?17
18. Regulation vanishes
• Vanishing: authorities do not transform their own job into managing
“Reflexive Governance Platforms”; then
*Innovative industry can go to fully self-regulating (private rules, private
standards, private contracting, private punishments, etc.)
up to full vertical reintegration by creation of new & private digital infrastructures
Old Power industry can be taken-over by digital platforms & Internet G.A.F.A
**Passive Consumers & Grand’Pa Public Service disappear from interplay
with industry.
***Only active users (with generation & storage assets) still strategically
interact, then are taken into account.
Users strongly motivated by niches of “value creation”, can create own “Users
Communities” bargaining with industry and/or creating “Community club niches” -
plugged as add-ons to general industry modularity
18
19. Alternative world (4)
~- Big e-Sisters: big self-regulation in private ordering set by companies
producing, managing & financing flow of radical innovation as long as they control
creation of new digital infrastructures & platforms, and the interactions with
production of new services
Big e-Sisters can deliver:
~scalability (deployment)
~coordination (infrastructure / services)
~hosting of “Pure consumers” after enough “Active enough Users” have created
enough value (to their companies’ standards)
~Up: to Universal Service, Postal Stamp, No Charge
Issue with privacy: individual “big data” is their gold mine (keeping “independent
service providers” prisoners of strategic moves & day-to-day data flows)
Issue with market power: Big e-sisters, in B2B, strategically control access to
services; in B2C they take enormous share of value created (today already
$1000Bn treasery in …cash)
20. How to conclude such amount of novelties?
#Is GrandPa really dying? And when? # To be
seen in 2022?
20
21. www.florence-school.eu 21
Thank you for your attention
Email contact: jean-michel.glachant@eui.eu
Follow me on Twitter: @JMGlachant > 35 000+ tweets
My web site: http://www.florence-school.eu